REGIONAL TRANSMISSION Broward County, Florida SYSTEM MASTER PLAN - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
regional transmission
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

REGIONAL TRANSMISSION Broward County, Florida SYSTEM MASTER PLAN - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jul 10, 2023 188 likes •370 views

REGIONAL TRANSMISSION Broward County, Florida SYSTEM MASTER PLAN Solicitation No. PNC2116651P1 Empower WWS with an Adaptive, Transparent and Defendable Regional Transmission System Master Plan ADAPTIVE MASTER PLAN & INNOVATIVE IDEAS &

slide-1
SLIDE 1

REGIONAL TRANSMISSION

Broward County, Florida

Solicitation No. PNC2116651P1

SYSTEM MASTER PLAN

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Empower WWS with an Adaptive, Transparent and Defendable

Regional Transmission System Master Plan

ADAPTIVE MASTER PLAN & DYNAMIC CIP INNOVATIVE IDEAS & NEW TECHNOLOGIES REDUNDANCY OF STAFF

  • Adapt to ever changing conditions
  • WWS can continue the CIP

planning cycle on their own after project completion

  • Understanding of why a project is

needed and the trigger for it

  • Maximize reduction of risk while

minimizing investments

  • County-owned support decision

tools

  • Monetize consequence of failure
  • Condition assessments tool

selector

  • Adaptable CIP management

platform

  • 80+ professionals exclusively

specialized in planning and asset management

  • Local team of Condition

assessment and master planning specialist, backed by B&V global resources

  • Training of WWS staff

$

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Scope of Work & Approach

Ricardo Vieira

Project Manager

Amanda Schwerman

Master Plan Lead

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Pioneers of Dynamic & Adaptive Planning; Enabling Utilities to Adapt to Changing Conditions

4

Static Adaptive

slide-5
SLIDE 5

RISK BASED

PRIORITIZATION

Pump Station Pipeline Emergency Plan

Based on Triggers

$20 M $18 M $6 M

DATA HUB

Key Performance

MODELING

Indicators Hydraulic, Transient / Surge

CAPITAL PLANNING

Capital, O&M, Inspections

  • Capital Prioritization

$4 M

CIP Improvements are

Cash Flow (2015 dollars) $16 M $14 M $12 M $10 M $8 M

  • Stakeholders

Important Triggers that Drive CIP

RawWaterIntake Pumping Treatment ControlValves WaterMain Storage

  • Renewal & Replacement
  • Regional Transmission System
  • Monetize Risk

(cost of failure vs improvement)

  • Business Cases (Financials)

Levering Technology and Innovation

  • GIS & SCADA
  • AM Programs (Maximo)
  • Sensors (Pressure/Flow)
  • Condition Assessments
  • Capacity & Growth
  • Operational Optimization
  • Energy & Resiliency
  • Identify & Reduce High Pressures

$2 M $0 M

2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025 2027 2029 2031 2033 2035 2037 2039

Dynamic Master Planning allows the County to invest in projects only when needed.

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Master Planning for Risk Reduction

Capacity and Redundancy Evaluations Condition and Reliability Evaluations

Comprehensive Capital Improvement Plan

Optimized CIP CIP Prioritization Identify Projects based

  • n Capacity

Analysis

WWS Planning & Operations Input

Transient Modeling Calibration System Evaluation Build Hydraulic Model Pipe Data Risk Prioritization WWS training Risk Prioritization Field Assessments Developing Emergency Plan Identify Projects based

  • n Risk

(Monetizing Risk) CIP Spending Analysis (iCIP) Tool Selection & Inspection Plan Pump Station Data

slide-7
SLIDE 7

New Ideas & Technologies

Ricardo Vieira

Project Manager

Amanda Schwerman

Master Plan Lead

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Innovyze’s InfoMaster Tool

  • ArcGIS based tool
  • Consolidates

data into a single platform

  • Streamlines

risk-based prioritization for rehab planning

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Physical

Traditional Risk Planning

Likelihood

  • f Failure

Economic Characteristics Failure History

Likelihood of Failure (LoF) Consequence of Failure (CoF)

Economic-Based Replacement Strategy No Proactive Replacement Condition Monitoring- Based Strategy Predictive Monitoring Strategy Replace/ Re-design Strategy

5 10 15 20 25 4 8 12 16 20 3 6 9 12 15 2 4 6 8 10 1 2 3 4 5

Provides management strategies based on system risk

External Impacts Consequence

  • f Failure

Environmental Social

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Follow WaterRF 4451 to monetize consequence of failure

Likelihood

  • f Failure

Environmental Economic Failure History External Impacts

Likelihood of Failure (LoF)

739,398 $ 4,963,776 $ 15,334,741 $ 5,489,925 $

  • $

6,268,252 $ 49,423,588 $ 64,093,928 $ 35,576,623 $ 667,370 $ 16,430,675 $ 199,127,037 $ 276,683,409 $ 188,702,793 $ 6,768,894 $ 42,970,404 $ 261,686,497 $ 255,773,656 $ 346,974,606 $ 21,984,289 $ 1,647,806 $ 8,402,144 $ 15,177,510 $ 49,885,355 $ 9,811,598 $

Economic-Based Replacement Strategy No Proactive Replacement Condition Monitoring- Based Strategy Predictive Monitoring Strategy Replace/ Re-design Strategy

Physical Characteristics Consequence

  • f Failure

Social

Consequence of Failure (CoF) Maximize Risk Reduction while Minimizing Investments

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Inspection Protocol Report

Pipeline Condition Assessment

A value added Service of Select any of the following information for the pipe to be inspected

Severe Major Moderate Minor Negligible Gravity Pressurized Pumped Gas Sludge Wastewater Water ABS ACP CIP CMP CSP CU DIP ERCP FRPP GS HDPE NCS PE … Cement Mortar Medium-Thick Coatings Thin-filmed coating Isolation/Dewater/ cleaning Live 1” to 7” 8” to 35” 36” to 60” >60”

Technology Selection Support Tool

RUN REPORT RESET QUIT Major Pressurized Wastewater DIP 8” to 35” Cement Mortar Live X

Risk Rating Flow Fluid Material Coating / Lining Controls Diameter

Remote Field Electromagnetic External Ultrasonic Thickness External Guided Wave Inline Leak and Gas Pocket Detection

Time Savings, Efficiencies and Consistency

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Integrated Capital Improvement Tool (iCIP) is a Powerful Decision Support Tool

Mallard Connector Main Transmission Main Line Item Size Quantity Unit Cost Construction Cost 36" DIP (34000 lf) Pipe 1 36 ##### lf $244.27 /lf $8,305,300 N/A Pipe 2 0 lf $0.00 /lf $0 N/A Pipe 3 0 lf $0.00 /lf $0 36" BOL Connection BOL Connection 36 3 ea $33,980.00 /ea $101,900 36" EOL Connection EOL Connection 36 1 ea $33,980.00 /ea $34,000 36" Line Valves (17) Line Valve 36 17 ea $33,980.00 /ea $577,700 Blowoff Valves (7) Blowoff Valve 7 ea $6,000.00 /ea $42,000 N/A Fire Hydrant 0 ea $2,600.00 /ea $0 Cathodic Protection (34000 lf) Cathodic Protection ##### lf $5.00 /lf $170,000 N/A Major Roadway Crossing 0 lf $5,000.00 /lf $0 Secondary Road Crossing (750 lf) Secondary Road Crossing 750 lf $800.00 /lf $600,000 N/A Railroad Crossing 0 lf $5,000.00 /lf $0 N/A Stream Crossing 0 ea $20,000.00 /ea $0 Pavement Removal and Replacement (28000 SYD) Pavement Removal and Replacement ##### SYD $65.00 /SYD $1,820,000 Erosion Control (34000 lf) Erosion Control ##### lf $3.00 /lf $102,000 Restoration (34000 lf) Restoration ##### lf $2.50 /lf $85,000 Traffic Control (340 days) Traffic Control 340 days $1,500.00 /day $510,000 N/A Additional Construction Cost 1 N/A N/A N/A /N/A $0 N/A Additional Construction Cost 2 N/A N/A N/A /N/A $0 N/A Additional Construction Cost 3 N/A N/A N/A /N/A $0 N/A Additional Construction Cost 4 N/A N/A N/A /N/A $0 N/A Additional Construction Cost 5 N/A N/A N/A /N/A $0 N/A Additional Construction Cost 6 N/A N/A N/A /N/A $0 N/A Additional Construction Cost 7 N/A N/A N/A /N/A $0 N/A Additional Construction Cost 8 N/A N/A N/A /N/A $0 N/A Additional Construction Cost 9 N/A N/A N/A /N/A $0 N/A Additional Construction Cost 10 N/A N/A N/A /N/A $0 N/A Additional Construction Cost 11 N/A N/A N/A /N/A $0 Subtotal $12,347,900 Surveys, Record Documents, GPS Information $61,700 General Requirements (10%) $1,234,800 Contractor Fee (5%) $617,400 Mobilization (3%) $370,400 Contingencies (10%) $1,234,800 Total Construction Cost $15,867,000

We will provide Broward County with a dynamic CIP management platform

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Maximize Risk Reduction While Minimizing Investments

50 100 150 200 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031

Project Capital Cost (Nominal $Millions) Relative Asset Portofolio Risk

Criticality Safety Regulatory Financial Target Score Cumulative Capital Spend

  • Higher Level of Spending Reduces Significant Level of Portfolio Risk
  • Capital is Being Spent on the Most Important Projects

Investment Drives Risk Reduction

13

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Broward County Risk Assessment Dashboard

Monagement Group e A B

e c

rheld Beach

L~uderd~

e·by

· ! he ·Se~

nd Park Lauderdale

I> Bing

R1:.J;. Heat Map

Pipe Size (in) 6 54

0-0

Pipe ID Material Year Pipe Size (in)

Number of Sites Filtered

B ~

e:

WARD ~

Re.set

COUNTY

92

FLOR I DA

Management Group

Material

l ength of Pipe by Management Group (ft)

VCP •

A C

PVC • C S.JK RCP

)()()( I

B

DIP I RPM I Y

ear

1963 2010

0-0

Cross/ Ad1acen1

PACP Score

Liker.hood of

Consequence of RiskScore failure Score failure Score

...

SV0368 RCP 1%3 42 Cross

200 26

4.7 12.1

s

  • SV1173

RCP 1963

36 Cross

2.33 2.6 4.7 12.4 LS0063 RPM 1976 27 Cross

38 46

17 7 ~ SV0367·M RCP 1963

42 Ad1~t

2.3 4.6

106 ~4

LS0078 RPM 1983 30 Cross

34 45

15.5

{!

~

l.50004

xxx

1999

42 Adjaci.nt

21 4.5

9S

.,

  • SV1172

RCP 1963 36 C1oss 2.33

23 4.5 10.7

2

.~3

SV1342 RCP 2003 36 Adjaci.nt 2.45

25

4.S 11.2 SV0004-M RCP 1963

54 C1oss

2.03 26 4.5 11.6

.,

  • 1.
v

c SD0316 DIP 1990 30 CIOss 34 44 15.0

~

SV0435 RCP 1963 39 Cross 2.50 2.5

4.4

11.2 g-2

6

~

SV134S RCP 2003 30 Adjacent 2.60 24

44

10.S

u

LS0019 PVC 2008 42 Cross 0.00 1.3

4.4

58

v

SV0003·M RCP 1963

54 CIOSS

2.00

24

A.J 10.2

Rf"P

1a;.1

~

rmtt.c

, 7,

4l

<1.;

J 4

~

BLACK &VEATCH

2

s

~"'

''

Likelihood of failure Total Score

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Assuring Continued Delivery

Rafael Frias

Regional Manager

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

F O U N D E D I N

12,000+ 1915

G L O B A L WO R K F O RC E

80+ 325+

F L O R I DA P RO F E S S I O NA L S

110+

O F F I C E S O N

SIX

C O N T I N E N T S P L A N N I N G A N D A S S E T M A NA G E M E N T P RO F E S S I O NA L S C O N T I N U O U S

F L O R I D A

P R E S E N C E S I N C E

1957

Tampa Fort Myers Jacksonville

60+

Orlando

SEVEN

F L O R I DA F L O R I DA C L I E N T S O F F I C E S

Lake Worth Coral Springs Coral Gables

Our team is committed to Broward County

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Questions?

Broward County, Florida

Solicitation No. PNC2116651P1