Reforming the Eurozone - Analysing Member-State Preferences Thomas - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

reforming the eurozone analysing member state preferences
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Reforming the Eurozone - Analysing Member-State Preferences Thomas - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Reforming the Eurozone - Analysing Member-State Preferences Thomas Lehner 1 1 SCEUS (University of Salzburg) Ottawa 26.11.2018 1/17 Reforming the Eurozone - Analysing Member-State Preferences Thomas Lehner Presentation outline About the


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1/17

Reforming the Eurozone - Analysing Member-State Preferences

Thomas Lehner1

1SCEUS (University of Salzburg)

Ottawa 26.11.2018

Thomas Lehner Reforming the Eurozone - Analysing Member-State Preferences

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2/17

Presentation outline

◮ About the project

◮ Data collected by the project ◮ Analysing Member-State Preferences

Thomas Lehner Reforming the Eurozone - Analysing Member-State Preferences

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3/17

About the Project

EMU Choices (.eu)

◮ June 2015 - June 2019

◮ Nine teams (Salzburg, Grenoble, Dublin, East Anglia, CEU, Stockholm, LUISS, ETH and Konstanz)

Research Questions

◮ Which member states pushed for monetary, economic and fiscal

integration, and why? ◮ What kind of economic and political integration model was advocated, and by which member state? ◮ How and to what extent did political economy interests drive member states’ preferences? ◮ Did international pressure and constitutional constraints influence governments’ preference formation?

Thomas Lehner Reforming the Eurozone - Analysing Member-State Preferences

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4/17

Research structure

5 research clusters

◮ Cluster 1: Case Studies

◮ Cluster 2: Quantitative Studies ◮ Cluster 3: Feasibility and dissemination ◮ Cluster 4: Theory ◮ Cluster 5: Legal

Thomas Lehner Reforming the Eurozone - Analysing Member-State Preferences

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5/17

Data

3 data frames

◮ EMU Historical

◮ EMU Formation ◮ EMU Position

Thomas Lehner Reforming the Eurozone - Analysing Member-State Preferences

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6/17

EMU Position

5-Step Data Collection Process

◮ policy proposals officially negotiated during the Eurozone crisis

◮ contested policy issues within these proposals. ◮ coding of preferences of all 28 EU member states and six EU institutions ◮ validation interviews ◮ aggregation

Thomas Lehner Reforming the Eurozone - Analysing Member-State Preferences

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7/17

EMU Position

10 Policy proposals

◮ Assistance to Greece, EFSF, ESM

◮ SixPack, Two-Pack, Fiscal Compact ◮ FTT, Eurobonds, 5-Presidents Reports ◮ Banking Union

Thomas Lehner Reforming the Eurozone - Analysing Member-State Preferences

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8/17

EMU Position

47 most contested issues

◮ they cover policy conflicts related to one of the ten selected reform

proposals ◮ identifiable in the available primary and secondary sources ◮ validated by experts

Thomas Lehner Reforming the Eurozone - Analysing Member-State Preferences

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9/17

Coding of preferences

Wasserfallen, Fabio, et al. ”Analysing European Union Decision-Making during the Eurozone Crisis with New Data.” European Union Politics 20.1 (2018). Thomas Lehner Reforming the Eurozone - Analysing Member-State Preferences

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10/17

How to use this data?

◮ What explains these positions?

◮ Which country was most successful? ◮ Explaining decision-making during the Eurozone ◮ Underlying dimensionality of political conflict

Thomas Lehner Reforming the Eurozone - Analysing Member-State Preferences

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11/17

What is structuring political conflict over EMU reform?

Possible underlying dimension

◮ More vs. Less integration

◮ Left vs. Right ◮ Fiscal disciplin vs. fiscal redistribution ◮ Or a combination of those?

Questions

◮ One, two or multidimensional conflict?

◮ Which conflict dimension(s) explain(s) the identified underlying conflict structure? ◮ For which policies do we observe deviant conflict structures?

Thomas Lehner Reforming the Eurozone - Analysing Member-State Preferences

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12/17

Method

Assumption

◮ Member states have an ideal point

◮ Ideal point structures their preferences ◮ Can be estemated

Dimension reduction methods

◮ W-Nominate

◮ Bayesian Ordinal Item Response Theory ◮ Basic Space Scaling (Robustness Check)

Thomas Lehner Reforming the Eurozone - Analysing Member-State Preferences

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13/17

How many underlying dimensions?

Lehner/Wasserfallen. ”Political Conflict in the Reform of the Eurozone.” European Union Politics 20.1 (2018). Thomas Lehner Reforming the Eurozone - Analysing Member-State Preferences

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14/17

One-dimensional IRT

Lehner/Wasserfallen. ”Political Conflict in the Reform of the Eurozone.” European Union Politics 20.1 (2018). Thomas Lehner Reforming the Eurozone - Analysing Member-State Preferences

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15/17

Where it does not fit:

◮ Specific economic interest

◮ Forward looking proposals ◮ Legal constraints and traditions ◮ Technocratic governments

Thomas Lehner Reforming the Eurozone - Analysing Member-State Preferences

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16/17

Conclusion

◮ One dimensions structures EMU conflict

◮ Not restricted to one issue area of EMU ◮ Pivotal role of Eastern MS ◮ Important role of coalition leaders - France and Germany

Thomas Lehner Reforming the Eurozone - Analysing Member-State Preferences

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17/17

Thank you!

Thomas Lehner Reforming the Eurozone - Analysing Member-State Preferences