REDWOOD CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT Educating Every Child For Success - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

redwood city school district
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

REDWOOD CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT Educating Every Child For Success - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

REDWOOD CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT Educating Every Child For Success Preliminary Budget for 2012-13 Presented by: Jan Christensen, Superintendent Raul A. Parungao, Chief Business Official June 13, 2012 1 Outline State Budget Revenue and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

REDWOOD CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT

Educating Every Child For Success

Preliminary Budget for 2012-13 Presented by: Jan Christensen, Superintendent Raul A. Parungao, Chief Business Official June 13, 2012

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Outline

 State Budget  Revenue and Expenditure Assumptions  Preliminary Budget 2012-13  Contingencies  Multi-Year Projection  State Preschool  Challenges and Uncertainties  Significant Dates

slide-3
SLIDE 3

State Budget

 State budget gap - $15.7 billion  Governor’s proposed solutions to close the budget gap

include:

Source: Legislative Analyst Office 3

Proposed Solutions In Billions Increase State revenue by temporarily increasing income tax and sales tax via ballot initiative in November 2012 $8.84 Offset by increase Proposition 98 funding due to increase in revenue

  • 2.91

Reduce State expenditures 5.23 Other solutions 5.35 Total Proposed Solution $16.51

slide-4
SLIDE 4

State Budget

 The increase in Prop 98 funding does not provide additional

funds for school districts. Additional funds will be used to:

 Backfill one-time actions  Pay down apportionment deferral (25% of the current $10 billion)  Restore transportation funding

 Other proposal

 Weighted Student Formula (WSF)  Mandate Block Grant  Eliminate Transitional K requirements and funding  Significant cuts to preschool and child care

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

State Budget

 If Voters reject the Governor’s initiative for November, there

will be trigger cuts, such as:

 School Districts and Community Colleges - $5.5 billion  UC and CSU - $0.5 Billion

 For School Districts

 The proposal to pay down the deferral will be eliminated  Reduction in funding by $441 per student  Weighted Student Formula will not be implemented

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Base Revenue Limit per ADA for RCSD

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Historical Deficit Factor

7

Deficit Factor is the percentage by which an expected allocation of funds to a school district or county

  • ffice of education is reduced. The State may apply deficit factors to revenue limits and categorical

programs when the State appropriation is insufficient based on the funding formulas specified by law.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Assumptions for Revenue Projection

 Enrollment – 9,382 (109 students more than last year)  Average Daily Attendance (ADA) – 9,054 or 96.5% attendance

rate

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Assumptions for Revenue Projection

9

 Funded Base Revenue Limit per ADA  * If the ballot initiative fails, the Governor proposed a trigger

cut of $441 per ADA, which will bring Funded BRL to $4,544.12 ($4,985.12 minus $441)

Description 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 Base Revenue Limit (BRL)-Prior Year $6,098.55 $6,074.55 $6,211.55 Add: COLA

  • 24.00

137.00 202.00 BRL-Current Year $6,074.55 $6,211.55 $6,413.55 Less: Deficit Factor

  • 1,091.17
  • 1,227.03
  • 1,428.43

BRL Before Trigger Cuts $4,983.38 $4,984.52 $4,985.12 Less: Trigger Cuts 0.00

  • 52.67

* Funded BRL per ADA $4,983.38 $4,931.85 $4,985.12

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Assumptions for Revenue Projection

 Medical Administrative Activities (MAA) - $600K  Mandate Reimbursement - $0 (will adjust once the funds are

received)

 K-3 Class Size Reduction Funding – 70% of the funding up to

20 students per class

 Lottery - $118 per ADA  Special Education revenue - No COLA  One-time transfer of fund balance from Deferred

Maintenance Fund

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Assumptions for Revenue Projection

 Federal categorical program

 Loss of one-time Jobs Bill Fund - $1.3 million  Loss of one-time Program Improvement Fund - $0.8 million

 State categorical program

 Economic Impact Aid and After School Program-same as last year  Loss of Quality Education Investment Act (QEIA)  Tier III Categorical funding-same as last year

 Local revenues

 Redwood City Education Foundation (RCEF)  Sequoia Health Care District (SHCD)  Family Center, which includes Tri-part agreement, Grove, SFF, & DHHS  TOSA Foundation  Parent Group donations  New funding commitments will be budgeted during the year

slide-12
SLIDE 12

General Fund Revenue

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Assumptions for Expenditure Projection

13

 Classroom staffing are projected using class sizes of:

 30:1 for Grades K-3  31:1 for Grades 4-8  170 student contacts for McKinley and Kennedy Middle School

 2 classes of Transitional K  New Positions

 1.0 FTE Student Attendance Coordinator funded by increased ADA  3.0 FTE Technology Resource Teacher funded by Title II and EIA  1.0 FTE Special Education Administrator funded by General Fund  Upgrade Technology Engineer Analyst position to Systems Manager

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Assumptions for Expenditure Projection

14

 Work year

 Teachers – 186 days (178 instruction, 8 Professional Development)  Classified Support and Management work year are based on full

calendar

 Status of Collective Bargaining

 RCTA – settled for 2012-13 with contingency language that is tied to

funding level

 CSEA – currently in negotiation and the District proposed similar

concession like RCTA

 The management calendar will be adjusted accordingly, but will be

credited by the previous work year reduction

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Assumptions for Expenditure Projection

 Employee benefits

 Statutory benefits – 0.6% decrease  Health and Welfare – projected at 8.4% increase

 Utilities – same as last year  Supplies and other operating expenses are about the same

 Cost of contract for Attention2Attendance  Cost of contract for Infinity Communications (E-Rate consultant)

 Estimated net cost of short-term borrowing -$120K  Special education budget deficit - $8.6 million

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

General Fund Expenditures

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Preliminary Budget 2012/13 (in thousands)

Audited Actual 2010/11 Estimated Actual 2011/12 Preliminary Budget 2012/13 Revenues $78,800 $80,810 $77,809 Less: Expenditures 76,669 82,675 80,445 Surplus/(Deficit) $2,131 ($1,865) ($2,636) Add: Beginning Fund Balance 6,550 8,681 6,816 Ending Fund Balance $8,681 $6,816 $4,180 Less: Designations 2,184 1,309 353 Reserve ($) $6,497 $5,507 $3,827 Reserve (%) 8.47% 6.66% 4.76%

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Preliminary Budget 2012/13 (in thousands)

Unrestricted General Fund Special Education Categorical Programs Tier III Categorical Total General Fund Revenues $51,062 $7,806 $10,096 $7,426 $76,390 Less: Expenditures 50,393 16,397 10,930 2,725 80,445 Surplus/(Deficit) $669 ($8,591) ($834) $4,701 ($4,055) Add: Transfer from Fund 14* 1,419 1,419 Add: Flexibility Transfer 4,701 (4,701) Add: Contributions (8,693) 8,591 102 Net Increase/(Decrease) in Fund Balance ($1,904) ($732) ($2,636) Add: Beginning Fund Balance 5,972 844 6,816 Ending Fund Balance $4,068 $0 $112 $0 $4,180 Less: Designations 241 112 353 Reserve ($) $3,827 $0 $0 $0 $3,827 Reserve (%) 4.76% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 4.76%

18 * One-time transfer from Deferred Maintenance Fund

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Contingencies

 Possible trigger cuts, if ballot initiative for November fails

 The Governor proposed reduction in funding of $441 per student or

about $3.9 million for RCSD

 As a result, the work year for all employees will be reduced (up to 13

days), with corresponding reduction in pay. Expenditures will be reduced by about the $3.9 million

 Pay down of deferral will be eliminated – this would require

larger short-term borrowing

 Weighted Student Formula will not be implemented

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Assumptions for Multi-Year Projection

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 COLA 2.24% 3.24% 2.50% 2.70% Deficit Factor

  • 20.602%
  • 22.272%
  • 22.272% -22.272%

Funded BRL $4,932 $4,985 $5,110 $5,248 Enrollment 9,273 9,382 9,442 9,409 Enrollment Growth (%) 1.69% 1.18% 0.64%

  • 0.35%

ADA 8,902 9,054 9,159 9,174 Attendance Rate 96.0% 96.5% 97.0% 97.5%

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Assumptions for Multi Year Projection

 Contingency language with RCTA will expire at 6/30/2013  Will resume negotiation by January 2013  Step and Column Adjustments is estimated at 1.5%  Health Benefits are projected to increase by 10% each year  Utility costs are projected to increase by 10% each year  Budget cuts needed to maintain minimum reserve

 2013/14 - $2 million ongoing  2014/15 – additional $1 million

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Multi-Year Projection (in thousands)

Estimated Actual 2011/12 Preliminary Budget 2012/13 Projected Budget 2013/14 Projected Budget 2014/15 Revenues $80,810 $76,390 $77,463 $79,412 Add: One-time Transfer In 1,419 Total Revenue $80,810 $77,809 $77,463 $79,412 Expenditures 82,675 80,445 80,485 82,093 Budget Cuts- Ongoing (2,000) (2,000) Budget Cuts-Ongoing (1,000) Total Expenditures $82,675 $80,445 $78,485 $79,093 Surplus/(Deficit) ($1,865) ($2,636) ($1,022) 319 Add: Beginning Fund Balance 8,681 6,816 4,180 3,158 Ending Fund Balance $6,816 $4,180 $3,158 $3,477 Less: Designations 1,309 353 121 121 Reserve ($) $5,507 $3,827 $3,037 $3,356 Reserve (%) 6.66% 4.76% 3.87% 4.24%

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

District’s Reserve

A 1% reserve is equivalent to about $800K

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Challenges and Uncertainties

 Result of the ballot initiative for November 2012  Impact of the trigger cuts in the projected years  Cash Flow  Reserve level is at a tipping point – no room for any

unplanned expenditures

 Increasing cost of health benefits and other operating costs  No salary increases in the last 4 years and possibly in the next

3 years

 Sacrifices from all employees  Employees moving to other districts or private sectors

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

State Preschool

 Current enrollment – 688 students  8 Locations

 Fair Oaks – 3 rooms  Garfield – 3 rooms  John Gill – 1 room  Hawes – 1 room  Hoover – 3 rooms  Roosevelt – 4 rooms  Selby Lane – 2 rooms  Taft – 1 room

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

State Preschool

 Staffing

 18 teachers  34 Instruction Aides  1 Administrator  4 Clerical Staff

 May Revision

 Funding reduction - $435,000 (subject to change in the final budget)  Represents 15.3% reduction in funding  Loss of student spaces  Reimbursement rate remains

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

State Preschool

 Proposed Solution – least impact to students, parents, and

staff

 Reduce 1 part-day classroom at Fair Oaks  Reduce 1 full day classroom at Roosevelt  Convert 1 full day classroom at Garfield to part-day classroom  Move Hawes classroom to Taft  Reduce clerical staff by 1.0 FTE

 Other proposed solutions

 Increase the fee for full-day preschool program from $675 per month

to $830 per month to comply with State requirements

 Transfer the responsibility of food program to Child Nutrition Dept.  Open 1 classroom at Roosevelt as a fee base child care facility

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

State Preschool

28 Rooms Students Teachers Aide Rooms Students Teachers Aide Rooms Students Teachers Aide Fair Oaks (Part Day) 3 128 3.00 5.00 2 96 2.00 4.00 (1) (32) (1.00) (1.00) Garfield (Part Day) 1 48 1.00 2.00 2 96 2.00 4.00 1 48 1.00 2.00 Garfield (Full Day) 2 48 2.00 4.00 1 24 1.00 2.00 (1) (24) (1.00) (2.00) Roosevelt (Part Day) 2 96 2.00 4.00 2 96 2.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 Roosevelt (Full Day) 2 48 2.00 4.00 1 24 1.00 2.00 (1) (24) (1.00) (2.00) Taft (Part Day) 1 32 1.00 1.00 2 80 2.00 3.00 1 48 1.00 2.00 Hoover (Part Day) 2 96 2.00 4.00 2 96 2.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 Hoover (Full Day) 1 24 1.00 2.00 1 24 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 Selby Lane (Part Day) 1 48 1.00 2.00 1 48 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 Selby Lane (Full Day) 1 24 1.00 2.00 1 24 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 Hawes (Part Day) 1 48 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 (1) (48) (1.00) (2.00) John Gill (Part Day) 1 48 1.00 2.00 1 48 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 Total 18 688 18.00 34.00 16 656 16.00 31.00 (2) (32) (2.00) (3.00) Summary Rooms Students Teachers Aide Rooms Students Teachers Aide Rooms Students Teachers Aide Part Day 12 544 12.00 22.00 12 560 12.00 23.00 16 0.00 1.00 Full Day 6 144 6.00 12.00 4 96 4.00 8.00 (2) (48) (2.00) (4.00) Total 18 688 18.00 34.00 16 656 16.00 31.00 (2) (32) (2.00) (3.00) 2011-12 Proposed 2012-13 Proposed Changes 2011-12 Proposed 2012-13 Proposed Changes

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Significant Dates

 Preliminary Budget – June 13, 2012  Budget adoption June 27, 2012

 Regardless of whether the State pass their budget or not,  Education Code 42127(a) requires that the board adopt the district

budget on or before June 30

 Budget enactment – June 15?  45-days revision from budget enactment  First interim report – mid-December  Second Interim report – mid-March

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Comments, Questions, & Answers

30