Recent Advances in Associate Professor Director, Mechanical Lots - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

recent advances in
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Recent Advances in Associate Professor Director, Mechanical Lots - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

6/20/2016 Heart Failure in 2016 Only CVD with stagnant/ increasing incidence, prevalence, morbidity (hospitalizations), mortality 20+ mil patients worldwide (6 mil in US) One and 5 years survival: 90% and 50% One year


slide-1
SLIDE 1

6/20/2016 1 Liviu Klein MD, MS

Associate Professor Director, Mechanical Circulatory Support and Heart Failure Device Programs Liviu.Klein@ucsf.edu

Recent Advances in Heart Failure

  • Only CVD with stagnant/ increasing incidence,

prevalence, morbidity (hospitalizations), mortality

  • 20+ mil patients worldwide (6 mil in US)

– One and 5 years survival: 90% and 50% – One year hospitalization rate 20-25%

  • HF reduced EF (HFrEF) – EF < 40%

– Lots of medications, devices

  • HF preserved EF (HFpEF) – EF > 50%

– No medications, devices

  • HF borderline or improved EF – EF 40-50%
  • Remote management needed to decrease costs and

serve an increasing number of patients

Heart Failure in 2016 Current Management of HFrEF

Diuretics Treat Clinical Congestion: Slow Disease Progression: Treat Residual Symptoms: ACE-I/ ARB BB MRB CRT Sudden Death: ICD BB MRB Digoxin, ARB, Hy-ISDN CRT Advanced Disease: Heart transplant LVAD

ACE-I: angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB: angiotensin 2 receptor blockers; BB: beta-blockers; MRB: mineralocorticoid receptor blockers; Hy-ISDN: hydralazine/ isosorbide dinitrate; ICD: implantable cardioverter defibrillator; CRT: cardiac resynchronization therapy; LVAD: left ventricular assist devices

Drugs Associated with Improved Survival in HFrEF

Beta blocker Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRB) ACE inhibitor Angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB)

Drugs that inhibit the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) have modest effects on survival 10% 20% 30% 40% 0% % Decrease in mortality

slide-2
SLIDE 2

6/20/2016 2

Mechanisms of Progression in Heart Failure

Von Lueder TG et al. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015; 12: 730-740.

Myocardial or vascular stress or injury Evolution and progression

  • f heart failure

Increased activity or response to maladaptive mechanisms Decreased activity or response to adaptive mechanisms

New Drugs: Mechanisms of Action

Von Lueder TG et al. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015; 12: 730-740.

Neurohormonal activation Vascular tone Cardiac fibrosis, hypertrophy Sodium retention

Mechanisms of Progression in Heart Failure

Von Lueder TG et al. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015; 12: 730-740.

Myocardial or vascular stress or injury Evolution and progression

  • f heart failure

Increased activity or response to maladaptive mechanisms Decreased activity or response to adaptive mechanisms

Angiotensin receptor blocker Neprilysin Inhibitor

PARADIGM-HF Trial

McMurray JJ et al. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371: 993-1004.

Prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and morbidity in Heart Failure trial

SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED TO REPLACE CURRENT USE OF ACE INHIBITORS AND ANGIOTENSIN RECEPTOR BLOCKERS AS THE CORNERSTONE OF THE TREATMENT OF HEART FAILURE

LCZ696 400 mg daily Enalapril 20 mg daily

slide-3
SLIDE 3

6/20/2016 3

PARADIGM-HF Trial Inclusion

McMurray JJ et al. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371: 993-1004.

  • NYHA class II-IV heart failure
  • LV ejection fraction ≤ 40%
  • BNP ≥ 150 (or NT-proBNP ≥ 600)
  • Any use of ACE inhibitor or ARB, but able to

tolerate stable dose equivalent to at least enalapril 10 mg daily for at least 4 weeks

  • Guideline-recommended use of beta-blockers and

mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists

  • SBP ≥ 95 mm Hg, eGFR ≥ 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 and

serum K ≤ 5.4 mEq/L at randomization

PARADIGM-HF Trial Design

McMurray JJ et al. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371: 993-1004.

2 weeks 1-2 weeks 2-4 weeks

Single-blind run-in period Double-blind period

(1:1 randomization)

Enalapril 10 mg BID 100 mg BID 100 mg BID 200 mg BID

Enalapril 10 mg BID LCZ696 200 mg BID Randomization

LCZ696 LCZ696 LCZ696

4187 pts. (375 mg daily) 4212 pts. (18.9 mg daily)

PARADIGM-HF Endpoints

McMurray JJ et al. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371: 993-1004.

  • CVD death or first HF hospitalization
  • Trial powered for 15% CVD mortality reduction
  • All-cause mortality
  • Change from baseline to 8 months in the

Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)

  • Time to new onset of atrial fibrillation
  • Time to first occurrence of a decline in renal

function

PARADIGM-HF Baseline Char.

McMurray JJ et al. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371: 993-1004.

LCZ696 (n=4187) Enalapril (n=4212) Age (years) 63.8 ± 11.5 63.8 ± 11.3 Women (%) 21.0% 22.6% Ischemic cardiomyopathy (%) 59.9% 60.1% LV ejection fraction (%) 29.6 ± 6.1 29.4 ± 6.3 NYHA functional class II / III (%) 71.6%/ 23.1% 69.4%/ 24.9% Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 122 ± 15 121 ± 15 Heart rate (beats/min) 72 ± 12 73 ± 12 N-terminal pro-BNP (pg/ml) 1631 (885-3154) 1594 (886-3305) B-type natriuretic peptide (pg/ml) 255 (155-474) 251 (153-465) History of diabetes 35% 35% Beta-adrenergic blockers 93.1% 92.9% Mineralocorticoid antagonists 54.2% 57.0% ICD and/or CRT 21.9% 21.4%

slide-4
SLIDE 4

6/20/2016 4

PARADIGM-HF Results: CV Death or 1st HF Hospitalization

McMurray JJ et al. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371: 993-1004. McMurray JJ et al. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371: 993-1004.

LCZ696 (n=4187) Enalapril (n=4212) HR (95% CI) P- value CV Death or 1st HF Hospitalization 9.7 11.8 0.80 (0.73-0.87) < 0.01 CV Death 5.9 7.3 0.80 (0.71-0.89) < 0.01 1st HF Hospitalization 5.7 6.9 0.79 (0.71-0.89) < 0.01

PARADIGM-HF Results: CV Death or 1st HF Hospitalization PARADIGM-HF Results: Sudden Cardiac Death

Desai AS et al. Eur Heart J. 2015; 36: 1990-1997.

PARADIGM-HF Results: Heart Failure Death

Desai AS et al. Eur Heart J. 2015; 36: 1990-1997.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

6/20/2016 5

McMurray JJ et al. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371: 993-1004.

PARADIGM-HF Results: Adverse Events

LCZ696 (n=4187) Enalapril (n=4212) p-value Prospectively identified adverse events Symptomatic hypotension 588 388 < 0.001 Serum potassium > 6.0 mmol/l 181 236 0.007 Serum creatinine ≥ 2.5 mg/dl 139 188 0.007 Cough 474 601 < 0.001 Discontinuation for adverse event 449 516 0.02 Discontinuation for hypotension 36 29 NS Discontinuation for hyperkalemia 11 15 NS Discontinuation for renal impairment 29 59 0.001 Angioedema (adjudicated) Medications, no hospitalization 16 9 NS Hospitalized; no airway compromise 3 1 NS

PARADIGM-HF Summary:

McMurray JJ et al. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371: 993-1004.

In HFrEF, compared to high doses of enalapril:

LCZ696 was more effective than enalapril in . . .

  • Reducing the risk of CV death, sudden death and HF death

by incremental 20%

  • Reducing the risk of HF hospitalization by incremental 21%
  • Reducing all-cause death by incremental 16%
  • Incrementally improving symptoms and physical limitations

LCZ696 was better tolerated than enalapril . . .

  • Less likely to cause cough, hyper K or renal impairment
  • Less likely to be discontinued due to an adverse event
  • Not more likely to cause serious angioedema
  • More hypotension, but no increase in drug discontinuation

ARNI Doubles Survival in HFrEF Compared to ACE-I/ ARBs

10% 20% 30% 40%

ACE Inhibitors (ACE-I) Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB)

0% % Decrease in Mortality

18% 20%

Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor (ARNI)

15%

  • Stop ACE-I for 48 hrs. prior
  • Make sure patient is not “dry” (adjust diuretics)
  • Start with low dose (24/26 mg BID) and increase

dose slowly (every 7-10 days) as tolerated if patients’ baseline BP < 120 mmHg

  • If BP > 120 mmHg, one can start at higher dose (49/

51 mg BID) and titrate up faster

  • For patients that cannot achieve target dose (98/102

mg BID), check NT-pro BNP and echocardiogram (LV size, LVEF) after 3 months on therapy to assess benefit

Caveats of Using ARNI

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6/20/2016 6

Future Management of HFrEF

Diuretics Treat Congestion: Slow Disease Progression: Treat Residual Symptoms: ARNI BB MRB CRT Sudden Death: ICD ARNI BB MRB Digoxin, ARB, Hy-ISDN CRT Advanced Disease: Heart transplant LVAD

ACE-I: angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB: angiotensin 2 receptor blockers; ARNI: angiotensin receptor blocker and neprilysin inhibitor; BB: beta-blockers; MRB: mineralocorticoid receptor blockers; Hy-ISDN: hydralazine/ isosorbide dinitrate; ICD: implantable cardioverter defibrillator; CRT: cardiac resynchronization therapy; LVAD: left ventricular assist devices

ARNI in HFpEF: PARAMOUNT and PARAGON

Solomon SD et al. Lancet. 2012; 380: 1387-1395.

Stay tuned: fall 2019

  • Only CVD with stagnant/ increasing incidence,

prevalence, morbidity (hospitalizations), mortality

  • 20+ mil patients worldwide (6 mil in US)

– One and 5 years survival: 90% and 50% – One year hospitalization rate 20-25%

  • HF reduced EF (HFrEF) – EF < 40%

– Lots of medications, devices

  • HF preserved EF (HFpEF) – EF > 50%

– No medications, devices

  • HF borderline or improved EF – EF 40-50%
  • Remote management needed to decrease costs and

serve an increasing number of patients

Heart Failure in 2016 Heart Failure Hospitalizations: 1 Million and Counting….

Go AS et al. Circulation. 2014; 129: e28-e292.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

6/20/2016 7

Dharmarajan K et al. JAMA. 2013; 309: 355-363.

Timing of Heart Failure Re- Hospitalizations: Heart Failure Hospitalizations: All Roads Lead to Rome

Dharmarajan K et al. JAMA. 2013; 309: 355-363.

High Mortality Post Discharge for Heart Failure Hospitalization

Solomon SD et al. Circulation. 2007; 116: 1482-1487.

Heart Failure Signs/ Symptoms in Hospitalized Patients

Admission Discharge

Symptoms (%)

Dyspnea on exertion 79 58 Dyspnea at rest 42 5 Orthopnea 50 12 PND 33 4 Fatigue 53 57

Signs (%)

JVP > 8 cm 33 6 Rales 57 13 S3 gallop 20 6 Edema > 2+ 50 13

Gattis WA et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43: 1534-1540.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

6/20/2016 8

Poor Ability to Predict Elevated Intracardiac Filling Pressures

  • Sens. Spec. PPV

NPV Dyspnea on exertion 66 52 45 27 Orthopnea 66 47 61 37 Edema 46 73 79 46 JVD 70 79 85 62 S3 73 42 66 44 CXR Cardiomegaly 97 10 61

  • Redistribution

60 68 75 52 Interstitial edema 60 73 78 53 Pleural effusion 43 79 76 47

Adapted from Chakko S. et al. Am J Med. 1991; 90: 353-358. Adapted from Butman SM. Et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993; 22: 968-975.

Congestion Does not Translate in EARLY Signs/Symptoms

Abnormal LV function (Sys and/or Dia)

Neurohormonal activation => ↑ Blood volume ↑ LV diastolic pressure Hemodynamic congestion (Increased PWP)

Alveolar edema ↑ PA Pressure

↑ RV + RA Pressure Systemic congestion (Leg edema; JVD; Hepatomegaly)

S Y M P T O M S

The Congestion Iceberg in Heart Failure

Redistribution in pulmonary vascular bed + interstitial edema

↑ Hydrostatic pressure ↑ Oncotic pressure ↑ Permeability Lymphatic drainage capacity Alveolar-capillary membrane integrity Abnormal lung mechanics Respiratory muscle dysfunction Other factors

Dyspnea

Congestion Precedes Most Heart Failure Hospitalizations

Zile MR et al. Circulation. 2008; 118: 1433-1441.

Congestion Precedes Most Heart Failure Hospitalizations

Zile MR et al. Circulation. 2008; 118: 1433-1441.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

6/20/2016 9

CardioMEMS HF System

PA Sensor and Delivery System

120 cm 4.5 cm

Patient Electronics System PA Pressure Database

Physician Access Via Secure Website

Heart Failure Pressure Sensor

Abraham WT et al. Lancet. 2011; 377: 658-666.

CHAMPION Trial: Baseline Char.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

6/20/2016 10

Abraham WT et al. Lancet. 2011; 377: 658-666.

CHAMPION Trial: Results

Abraham WT et al. Lancet. 2016; 387: 453-461.

CHAMPION Trial – Long Term Results Success of a CHAMPION: Treatment Algorithm

Costanzo MR et al. J Am Coll Cardiol HF. 2016; 4: 333-344. Costanzo MR et al. J Am Coll Cardiol HF. 2016; 4: 333-344.

CHAMPION Trial: Medications Changes

slide-11
SLIDE 11

6/20/2016 11

Costanzo MR et al. J Am Coll Cardiol HF. 2016; 4: 333-344.

CHAMPION Trial: Diuretic Changes by PA Pressures

Costanzo MR et al. J Am Coll Cardiol HF. 2016; 4: 333-344.

CHAMPION Trial: Vasodilator Changes by PA Pressures

  • Congestion is the lead cause of HF hospitalizations
  • Congestion contributes to progression of HF
  • Patients leave hospital with congestion, resulting in

high rehospitalization rate

  • Congestion is often subclinical and difficult to assess

when present

  • Significant dissociation between hemodynamic and

clinical congestion, even when hemodynamics are very abnormal

  • Need for better monitoring of degree and changes in

congestion (more accurate and sensitive)

Congestion in Heart Failure Hemodynamic vs. Clinical Congestion in Heart Failure

Heart Rate Variability Resting heart rate Activity level Respiration rate Intrathoracic fluid

slide-12
SLIDE 12

6/20/2016 12

Conclusions

  • Monitoring PAP/ PWP can provide early

warning of condition worsening/ decompensation much better than body weight and before symptoms

  • Most changes occur over a few days - weeks
  • Having a treatment algorithm based on

PAP/PWP values is key to successful treatment and preventing heart failure readmissions

  • Always treat to max: drive pressures down to

patient’s normal

Future Management of HFrEF

Diuretics Treat Congestion: Slow Disease Progression: Treat Residual Symptoms: ARNI BB MRB CRT Sudden Death: ICD ARNI BB MRB Digoxin, ARB, Hy-ISDN CRT Advanced Disease: Heart transplant LVAD

ACE-I: angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB: angiotensin 2 receptor blockers; ARNI: angiotensin receptor blocker and neprilysin inhibitor; BB: beta-blockers; MRB: mineralocorticoid receptor blockers; Hy-ISDN: hydralazine/ isosorbide dinitrate; ICD: implantable cardioverter defibrillator; CRT: cardiac resynchronization therapy; LVAD: left ventricular assist devices

Hemodynamic Implantable/ wearable hemodynamic monitors

Liviu Klein MD, MS

Associate Professor Director, Mechanical Circulatory Support and Heart Failure Device Programs Liviu.Klein@ucsf.edu 312-203-5354