Reaction dynamics of slow collisions in light neutron excess systems - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

reaction dynamics of slow collisions in light neutron
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Reaction dynamics of slow collisions in light neutron excess systems - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Reaction dynamics of slow collisions in light neutron excess systems Unified studies from bounds to continuum in Be isotopes I. Introduction II. Framework III.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Reaction dynamics of slow collisions in light neutron excess systems 伊藤 誠

関西大学 システム理工学部 物理応用物理学科

  • I. Introduction
  • II. Framework
  • III. Varieties of structures in 12Be and Be isotopes

-Unified studies from bounds to continuum in Be isotopes

V. Summary and feature plan

  • IV. Enhancements induced by large amplitude motions
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Molecular structures will appear close to the respective cluster threshold. α‐Particle ⇒ Stable Systematic Appearance

  • f 

cluster structures

3H+p ~ 20 MeV

Cluster structures in 4N nuclei

IKEDA Diagram

Ikeda’s Threshold rules

Be isotopes Molecular Orbital : Itagaki et al., Abe et al,….

―  +

PRC61,62 (2000)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Studies on Exotic Nuclear Systems in (Ex ,N, Z,J) Space

( N,Z ) : Two Dimensions

  • Ex. energy

Structural Change Low‐lying Molecular Orbital : 

―、+‥

Unbound Nuclear Systems Slow RI beam Decays in Continuum Is Threshold Rule valid ?? N

Systematics of 8~

16Be

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Interests from the viewpoints of large amplitude collective motions Breakup Scattering

Reactions are extreme limits of large amplitude collective motions !

How to characterize … Binary states Combined states Reaction path in adiabatic energy surfaces (AESs) Subjects

  • 1. Pursuit of structural changes over a wide region in AESs
  • 2. Investigation of reaction path in AESs and enhancements in

connection to AESs structures

Today’s report

  • 1. Global features of structures in 12Be and Be isotopes
  • 2. Non‐adiabatic phenomena in large amplitude reactions
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Extension of microscopic cluster model (Test calculation for 10Be)

Unified model between M.O. and He clusters :PLB588 (04)

+ +

...

C1 C2 C3



0Pi (i=x,y,z) Coupled channels with Atomic orbitals

  • Mol. Orb.

6He

Decay widh PTP113 (05) +6He Cross sections PLB636 (06)

10Be=++N+N

ーi W(R)

S, Ci

: Variational PRM.

S

5He 5He

Combine Absorbing B.C. Scattering B.C.

  • Tr. densites

10Be

→ +6He Breakup

< | | >

slide-6
SLIDE 6

4 8 12 −8 −4 4 8 Energy ( MeV ) α − α α − α α − α α − α Distance ( fm )

Femto Molecules :12Be=++4N

7He 5He 6He 8He 6He

Ionic Ionic Atomic 01

+

02

+

Neutrons’ ex. (‐)2(‐)2 (‐)2 (+)2

(0pR )(0pL) (+)2

05

+

03

+

04

+

06

+

+8He ⇒ 6He+6He Covalent

6He + 6He

+ 8He Clusters’ Relative ex. Various structures are generated by excitation

  • f ‐

and neutron degree

  • f freedom.
slide-7
SLIDE 7

−8 −4 4 8

Energy ( MeV )

2 1 − Re Sel −8 −4 4 8

Energy ( MeV )

2 1 − Re Sel −8 −4 4 8

Energy ( MeV )

2 1 − Re Sel −8 −4 4 8

Energy ( MeV )

2 1 − Re Sel −8 −4 4 8

Energy ( MeV )

2 1 − Re Sel

Be isotopes from bounds to continuums : J = 0+

8Be 10Be 12Be 14Be 16Be

Deformed states (Clusters) Compact states (Shell model) Excitation of ‐rel. motion

xHe yHe

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Global behaviors of Level Crossings in Be isotopes

Core‐Core distance Large Small

A + B C + D E + F* E + F

Energy Compact ( Normal ) Clusters ( Intruder ) Internal States Asymptotic States Level Crossing

slide-9
SLIDE 9

2 4 6 8 10 12 −10 10 20 α − α Distance ( fm ) Excitation Energy ( MeV ) 4He + 6He 2 4 6 8 10 12 −10 10 20 6He + 8He Excitation Energy ( MeV ) α − α Distance ( fm )

 + 6Heg.s.

8Heg.s.

+ 6Heg.s.

10Be 14Be

Level Crossings in 12,14Be=++XN (X=2,6) (0p)2 (sd)2 (0p)4(sd)2 (0p)2(sd)4

Level Crossing Level Crossing

slide-10
SLIDE 10

4 8 12 −10 10 20 α − α Distance ( fm ) Excitation Energy ( MeV ) Adiabatic energy surfaces (JP = 0+ ) 4He + 6Heg.s. ( π ( π ( π ( π1/2

1/2 1/2 1/2 − − − − )

) ) )2

2 2 2

( π ( π ( π ( π3/2

3/2 3/2 3/2 − − − − )

) ) )2

2 2 2

( σ ( σ ( σ ( σ1/2

1/2 1/2 1/2 + + + + )

) ) )2

2 2 2

Weak Coupling

4 8 12 −10 10 20 α − α Distance ( fm ) Excitation Energy ( MeV ) Adiabatic energy surfaces (JP = 0+ ) 4He + 6Heg.s. ( π ( π ( π ( π1/2

1/2 1/2 1/2 − − − − )

) ) )2

2 2 2

( π ( π ( π ( π3/2

3/2 3/2 3/2 − − − − )

) ) )2

2 2 2

( σ ( σ ( σ ( σ1/2

1/2 1/2 1/2 + + + + )

) ) )2

2 2 2

α α α α + 6He(21

+)

Adiabatic surfaces (J= 0+) Energy spectra ( J= 0+ )

ーi W(R)

+6He(21

+)

10Be (0+) case : M.I., PLB636, 236 (2006)

Cluster

slide-11
SLIDE 11

S‐matrices to continuums

4 8 12 16 0.001 0.002 Decay energy ( MeV ) Psude states <− ground state | Sf<−i |2 1st Peak ( Single ) 2nd Peak ( Coherent ) 4He + 6He(21

+) Cluster

(π1/2

−)2

4 8 12 16 0.25 0.5 Decay energy ( MeV ) Pole contribution in decays to 4He+6He(21

+)

| Sf<−i |2 4He + 6He(21

+) Cluster

(π1/2

−)2

Smat.( Poles ← G.S.) Smat.( Conti.←G.S. )

Nuclea breakup : 10Be +12C ⇒ 10Be(0+ conti.) + 12C (CDCC cal.)

S‐matrices to Poles

03

+

04

+

04

+

03

+

slide-12
SLIDE 12

4 8 12 −10 10 20 α − α Distance ( fm ) Excitation Energy ( MeV ) Adiabatic energy surfaces (JP = 0+ ) 4He + 6Heg.s. ( π ( π ( π ( π3/2

3/2 3/2 3/2 − − − − )

) ) )2

2 2 2

4He + 6He(21

+)

4 8 12 −10 10 20 α − α Distance ( fm ) Excitation Energy ( MeV ) Adiabatic energy surfaces (JP = 0+ ) 4He + 6Heg.s. α α α α + 6He(21

+)

4He + 6He(21

+)

Non‐adiabatic path is main process.

4 8 12 −10 10 20 α − α Distance ( fm ) Excitation Energy ( MeV ) Adiabatic energy surfaces (JP = 0+ ) 4He + 6Heg.s. ( π ( π ( π ( π1/2

1/2 1/2 1/2 − − − − )

) ) )2

2 2 2

( π ( π ( π ( π3/2

3/2 3/2 3/2 − − − − )

) ) )2

2 2 2

( σ ( σ ( σ ( σ1/2

1/2 1/2 1/2 + + + + )

) ) )2

2 2 2

Weak Coupling

Reaction path in 10Be → xHe + yHe Breakup reaction (Positive Parity)

×

01

+

03

+

01

+

→ 03

+

is the dominant transition.

10Be(0+) → [ 

+ 6He(21

+) ] 0+

Reaction Path in Breakup

slide-13
SLIDE 13

4 8 12 10 20 α − α Distance ( fm ) Excitation Energy ( MeV ) Adiabatic energy surfaces (JP = 1− ) ( π ( π ( π ( π3/2

3/2 3/2 3/2 − − − − σ

σ σ σ1/2

1/2 1/2 1/2 + + + + )

) ) ) [ α [ α [ α [ α + 6Heg.s. ] [ α [ α [ α [ α + 6He(21

+) ]

α α α α + 6Heg.s.

+6He(01

+) → +6He(21 +) 4 8 12 10 20 α − α Distance ( fm ) Excitation Energy ( MeV ) Adiabatic energy surfaces (JP = 1− ) 4He + 6Heg.s.

 +6Heg.s.  + 6Heg.s. ⇒ +6He(21

+) scattering (Negative Parity)

Avoided crossing at the surface Landau‐Zener type enhancement

slide-14
SLIDE 14

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 −10 10 Distance ( fm )

Energy ( MeV )

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 −10 10 Distance ( fm )

Energy ( MeV )

Level Crossing in 12Be (1)

(‐)2 (+)2 (‐)2 (‐)2  + 8Heg.s.  + 8Heg.s. (‐)2 (+)2 (‐)2 (‐)2

+

(‐)2 (+)2  + 8Heg.s.

+

S=1 corr.

Un correlated AESs Correlated AESs

Two AESs are almost degenerated due to correlations ⇒ Crossing occurs at inner region !

slide-15
SLIDE 15

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 −10 10 Distance ( fm )

Energy ( MeV )

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 −10 10 Distance ( fm )

Energy ( MeV )

Level Crossing in 12Be (2) Correlated AESs AESs with full coupling

Coupling with all configurations Lowest minimum smoothly connected to +8He g.s. ⇒ Formation of adiabatic conjunction Conjunction G.S.⇔ +8He  + 8Heg.s. G.S.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

−8 −4 4 8

Energy ( MeV )

6He + 6He 5He + 7He 4He + 8He

  • a. u.

Monopole transition of 12Be

   

1 1 2 0

) , (

A i i f

r IS E M

2

) , ( IS E M

Adiabatic conjunction enhances the monopole transition !

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 −8 −4 4 8 Distance ( fm )

Energy ( MeV ) (‐)2 (+)2

8He

01

+

03

+

01

+ → 03 +

is enhanced.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Contents of present report Results

  • 1. Unified studies form bounds to continuums in Be isotopes

Feature studies

Extension to SD shell ⇒ O=+12C+XN、Ne=+16O+XN Generalities and Specialities : hybrid structures of clusters + excess neutrons in O and Ne

2. Reactions with large amplitudes in connection to adiabatic energy surfaces

  • 1. There appears a wide variety of structures in excited states (Cluster + excess

N)

  • 2. Enhancements occur depending on the structures of AESs.

10Be : Non‐adiabatic path is dominant in monopole breakup and slow scattering. 12Be : Adiabatic path is dominant in monopole b.u. (Formation of conjunction)

Recently, we have just succeeded in extending the model to general two centers.

slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Systematics based on the Cluster Picture

10Be 14Be

  

R:(0P3/2 )2

L:(0P3/2 )-4 R:(0P3/2)-2 L:(0P3/2)4

8Be 16Be

  

R:(0P3/2 )-4

L:(0P3/2 )-4 R:(0P3/2)4 L:(0P3/2)4 Similar Similar

Special feature in 12Be

12Be=6He+6He, +8He

is a self conjugate when atomic p‐h are exchanged. ⇒ This is a special nucleus in even Be isotopes We are now analyzing wave functions.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

4 8 12 −10 10 20 α − α Distance ( fm ) Excitation Energy ( MeV ) Adiabatic energy surfaces (JP = 0+ ) 4He + 6Heg.s. ( π ( π ( π ( π1/2

1/2 1/2 1/2 − − − − )

) ) )2

2 2 2

( π ( π ( π ( π3/2

3/2 3/2 3/2 − − − − )

) ) )2

2 2 2

( σ ( σ ( σ ( σ1/2

1/2 1/2 1/2 + + + + )

) ) )2

2 2 2

Weak Coupling

4 8 12 −10 10 20 α − α Distance ( fm ) Excitation Energy ( MeV ) Adiabatic energy surfaces (JP = 0+ ) 4He + 6Heg.s. ( π ( π ( π ( π1/2

1/2 1/2 1/2 − − − − )

) ) )2

2 2 2

( π ( π ( π ( π3/2

3/2 3/2 3/2 − − − − )

) ) )2

2 2 2

( σ ( σ ( σ ( σ1/2

1/2 1/2 1/2 + + + + )

) ) )2

2 2 2

α α α α + 6He(21

+)

Adiabatic surfaces (J = 0+) Energy spectra ( J = 0+ )

ーi W(R)

+6He(21

+)

GTCM + Absorbing Boundary Condition : PLB (2006)