Re vie w Pr oc e ss Oc to b e r 22, 2018 Re vie w Pr oc e ss for - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Re vie w Pr

• c e ss

Oc to b e r 22, 2018

Re vie w Pr

• c e ss for

Conne c t Or e gon VI

Received, eligibility determined Regional Solutions Team Modal Committees Final Review Committee Oregon Transportation Commission Area Commissions on Transportation Modal Staff Review

November 2015 – January 2016 February March May June July - August Timeline

What’s r e quir e d pe r statute

• Sta tute re q uire s so lic iting re c o mme nda tio ns fro m

c e rta in c o mmitte e s prio r to g o ing to OT C

–

Sta te Avia tio n Bo a rd

–

F re ig ht Adviso ry Co mmitte e

–

Ra il Adviso ry Co mmitte e

–

Bic yc le a nd Pe de stria n Co mmitte e

–

Applic a b le Are a Co mmissio n o n T ra nspo rta tio n

–

Re g io na l So lutio ns T e a ms

• Do e s no t spe c ify the fo llo wing

–

T ime line s fo r e a c h re vie w

–

Se q ue nc e o f the re vie ws

4

Pote ntia l c ha ng e w/ in the sta tute ’s pa ra me te rs

• Mo re c o nc urre nt re vie ws to stre a mline the

pro c e ss

–

T ime sa ving s o f a ppro xima te ly 1-2 mo nths

• Diffe re nt re vie w pro c e ss fo r Pa rt 2 pro je c ts

–

Will wa nt re vie we rs to ta ke lo o k a t the pro je c ts fro m a mo re ma c ro sc o pic sta ndpo int

–

F e we r, b ut mo re c o mple x pro je c ts

–

Po te ntia l fo r utilizing c o mmitte e s in a diffe re nt fa shio n

5

Conc urre nt a pproa c h – minima l c ha ng e s

Dra ft re vie w proc e ss a pproa c h

Received, eligibility determined RSTs Modal Committees Final Review Committee Oregon Transportation Commission ACTs Modal Staff Review

6

Pa rt 2 spe c ific proc e ss

Dra ft re vie w proc e ss a pproa c h

Received, eligibility determined Modal Committees Final Review Committee (include reps from RSTs & ACTs) Oregon Transportation Commission Modal Staff Review

Technical Review Strategic Review

7

Pa rt 2 spe c ific proc e ss hig hlig hts

• T

e c hnic a l re vie w

–

Mo da l sta ff a nd mo da l c o mmitte e s fo c us o n func tio n o f la rg e r sc a le pro je c ts

–

E xa mining mo re o f the nuts a nd b o lts o f fe a sib ility

• Stra te g ic re vie w

–

Go a l o f this g ro up is to lo o k a t the se pro je c ts with a b ro a de r vie w, whic h a re in the b e st inte re st o f the sta te a s a who le in c o njunc tio n with o the r g o a ls a nd stra te g ie s

–

A F ina l Re vie w Co mmitte e with minimum a llo c a tio ns o f me mb e rs fro m RST s a nd ACT s

• RST

a nd ACT re ps pro vide the ir pe rspe c tive s, b ut in the c o nte xt

• f a g ro up ma king a sta te wide de c isio n

8

Aspira tiona l c ha ng e s to proc e ss

• Ac kno wle dg ing tha t so me de sire d c ha ng e s ma y re q uire

le g isla tive a c tio n

• Wha t do e s a mo re stre a mline d, ye t suffic ie ntly tho ro ug h pro c e ss

lo o k like ?

• Po te ntia l fo r:

– Additio n o r sub tra c tio n o f c o mmitte e s within the re vie w

pipe line

– Cha ng ing the fo c us a re a o f a g ive n re vie w g ro up – Simila r o r muc h diffe re nt pro c e ss fo r Pa rt 2 pro je c ts a s

c o mpa re d to Pa rt 1 pro je c ts