RBC Capital Markets London Gold Conference
November 2013
RBC Capital Markets London Gold Conference November 2013 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
RBC Capital Markets London Gold Conference November 2013 Cautionary statements All monetary amounts in U.S. dollars unless otherwise stated Total cash costs shown net of by-product sales unless otherwise stated CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING
November 2013
2
All monetary amounts in U.S. dollars unless otherwise stated Total cash costs shown net of by-product sales unless otherwise stated CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain information contained in this presentation, including any information relating to New Gold’s future financial or operating performance as well as information respecting Rainy River and its assets may be deemed “forward looking”. All statements in this presentation, other than statements of historicalfact, that address events or developments that New Gold expects to occur are “forward-looking statements”. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, but not alw ays, identified by the use of for ward-looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “projects”, “potential”, “believes” or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “ w ill be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved” or the negative connotation. For ward-looking statements in this presentation include, among others, statements with respect to: guidance for production, cash costs and all-in sustaining costs (and its components); the potential difference between gold price and cash and all-in sustaining costs, including relative to other companies; potential modifications to operations (and the cost of any such modifications) and potential opportunities to increase throughput at New Afton exploration potential and the results of future exploration activities; expected future mining activities; the expected or potential annual production, expected cash costs and expected development cost of New Gold’s projects; the estimation of mineral reserves and resources and the realization of such estimates; the expected life of New Gold’s mines and projects; the timing of completion of feasibility studies or updates, reserve updates and other technical w orkor reports; the adequacy of capitalresources; and expected capitalexpenditures and exploration expenditures. All forward-looking statements in this presentation are based on the opinions and estimates of management as of the date such statements are made and are subject to important risk factors and uncertainties, many of which are beyond New Gold’s ability to control or predict. Material assumptions regarding our forward looking statements are discussed in this presentation, the annual MD&A, the AIF and our Technical Reports. Forw ard-looking statements are necessarily based on estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to known and unknow n risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, without limitation: significant capital requirements; price volatility in the spot and forward markets for commodities; fluctuations in the international currency markets and in the rates of exchange of the currencies of Canada, the United States, Australia, Mexico and Chile; discrepancies bet ween actual and estimated production, between actual and estimated reserves and resources and between actual and estimated metallurgical recoveries; changes in national and local government legislation in Canada, the United States, Australia, Mexico and Chile or any other country in w hich New Gold currently or may in the future carry on business; taxation; controls, regulations and political or economic developments in the countries in w hich New Gold does or may carry on business; the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development, including the risks of obtaining and maintaining the validity and enforceability of the necessary licenses and permits and complying w ith the permitting requirements of each jurisdiction in which New Gold operates, including, but not limited to: in Canada, obtaining the necessary permits for Blackwater and the Rainy River Gold Project; in Mexico, w here Cerro San Pedro has a history of ongoing legal challenges related to our environmental authorization (EIS); and in Chile, w here the courts had temporarily suspended the approval of the environmental permit for El Morro; the lack of certainty w ith respect to foreign legal systems, which may not be immune from the influence of political pressure, corruption or other factors that are inconsistent with the rule of law; the uncertainties inherent to current and future legal challenges New Gold is or may become a party to; diminishing quantities or grades of reserves and resources; competition; loss of key employees; additional funding requirements; rising costs of labour, supplies, fuel and equipment; actual results of current exploration or reclamation activities; uncertainties inherent to mining economic studies including the PEA for Blackwater and the Feasibility Study for the Rainy River Gold Project; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; accidents; labour disputes; defective title to mineral claims or property or contests over claims to mineral properties; uncertaintiesw ith respect to the successful integration of the business of Rainy River w ithin the business of New Gold; unexpected delays and costs inherent to consulting and accommodating rights of First Nations; and uncertaintiesw ith respect to obtaining all necessary surface rights for the Rainy River Project. In addition, there are risks and hazards associated w ith the business of mineral exploration, development and mining, including environmental events and hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected formations, pressures, cave-ins, flooding and gold bullion losses (and the risk of inadequate insurance or inability to obtain insurance to cover these risks) as well as “Risk Factors” included in New Gold’s (and, in respect to information related to the Rainy River Gold Project, in Rainy River’s) disclosure documents filed on and available at www.sedar.com. Forw ard-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results and future events could materially differ from those anticipated in such statements. All of the forward-looking statements contained in this presentation are qualified by these cautionary statements. New Gold expressly disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, events or otherw ise, except in accordance with applicable securities law s. All endnotes can be found at the conclusion of the presentation and should be review ed.
Portfolio
in top-rated jurisdictions Invested and experienced team Among lowest-cost producers with solid track record Peer-leading growth pipeline A history
creation
3
Blackwater New Afton Rainy River Mesquite Cerro San Pedro El Morro Peak Mines
Mine Life: 15+ years Mine Life: 14 years Mine Life: 15+ years Mine Life: 10+ years Mine Life: 4+ years Mine Life: 17 years Mine Life: 8 years
#2
CA NA DA
#6
UNITED STATES
#5
MEXICO
#3
CHILE
#1
AUSTRALIA
OPERATING DEVELOPMENT
4
Mining investment – country rankings(1)
(1) Rankings based on 25 countries evaluated in 2013 Behre Dolbear Report – 2013 Ranking of Countries for Mining Investm ent: “Where Not to Invest”.
Growing gold resource base in Canada
18.0 Canada 5.7 USA 2.9 Chile 1.7 Mexico 0.9 Australia GOLD RESERVES (Moz)(4) 7.8 11.8 23.1 29.2 GOLD M&I RESOURCES (Moz)(1)(2)(4) GOLD M&I RESOURCES (Moz)(1)(4)
+44% per share +20% per share
since 2009
New Gold New Gold & Rainy River(3) New Gold New Gold & Rainy River(3)
5
(1) Measured and Indicated Resources inclusive of Reserves.
6
Randall Oliphant Executive Chairman Robert Gallagher President & CEO Brian Penny Executive VP & CFO Ernie Mast VP Operations EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM BOARD OF DIRECTORS David Emerson Former Canadian Cabinet Minister James Estey Former Chairman, UBS Securities Canada Robert Gallagher President & CEO Vahan Kololian Founder, Terra Nova Partners Martyn Konig Former Executive Chairman, European Goldfields Pierre Lassonde Chairman, Franco-Nevada Randall Oliphant Executive Chairman Raymond Threlkeld Mining Consultant
Significantly invested team
sustaining costs(1) results in incremental margin(2)
in cash costs(3) from 2009 to 2013E
2013 GUIDANCE – ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS ($/OZ)(1)
New Gold Mid-Tier Average(4) Senior Average(5)
~$900 ~$1,050 ~$1,100
7
Lower costs driving margin expansion
8
Gold production(1)
Silver production
2013 Total cash costs(2)
2013 All-in sustaining costs(2)(3)
Assum ptions for the fourth quarter of 2013: Gold - $1,300 per ounce; Copper - $3.25 per pound; Silver - $20.00 per ounce; AUD/USD and CDN/USD parity.
Copper production
2013 outlook
New Afton hitting its stride
increase to 12,000 tonnes per day three months ahead of schedule
throughput increases in 2014 and beyond
0.67 0.78 0.82 0.79% 0.96% 0.98% Q1 2013 Q2 2013 Q3 2013 Q1 2013 Q2 2013 Q3 2013
GOLD COPPER
GRADE (g/t) GRADE (%)
83% 87% 87% 81% 88% 88% Q1 2013 Q2 2013 Q3 2013 Q1 2013 Q2 2013 Q3 2013
RECOVERY (%) RECOVERY (%)
15 22 25 12 19 21 Q1 2013 Q2 2013 Q3 2013 Q1 2013 Q2 2013 Q3 2013
PRODUCTION (Koz) PRODUCTION (Mlbs) 9
Evaluating further throughput expansion potential to ~14,000 tonnes per day
10
DRAWBELLS
three years, of broken reserves accessible
CONVEYOR
14,000 tonnes per day conveyed
CRUSHER
August 2013
Evaluating further throughput expansion potential to ~14,000 tonnes per day
11
to 15,500 tonnes per day over five day period
however a commensurate decrease in recovery was seen
alternatives to process at higher rate and bring recoveries into the high 80’s/low 90’s
grinding
front end of the flotation circuit
Looking Northwest C Zone B Zone Reserve
East Cave Extension and Hanging Wall Lens
New Afton C-Zone exploration program
12
C-ZONE RESOURCE SUMMARY(1)
medium-term resource growth
lateral extension of B-Zone currently being mined
through 2012 exploration efforts
extension of ore body
incorporated into year-end mineral reserve and resource update
Measured and Indicated Inferred
GOLD 0.3 Moz at 0.77 g/t 0.4 Moz at 0.62 g/t COPPER 211 Mlbs at 0.77% 301 Mlbs at 0.68%
Industry leading organic growth profile
production by ~1.75 times over current
increased shares outstanding by 25% for potential +150% increase in production
average cash costs at each project
Four current
Three organic projects +800 Koz(1) Blackwater(2) Rainy River
2013 Gold Production Annual Production Potential of Growth Assets
El Morro
13
Three world-class projects
Rainy River Blackwater El Morro (30%) Significant Gold M&I Resource Base(1)(2) 6.2 Moz 8.6 Moz 2.9 Moz Exploration Potential Intrepid Zone/Multiple Regional T argets Capoose/Multiple Regional T argets El Morro Zone/ Block Cave Potential Jurisdiction Ontario, Canada British Columbia, Canada Chile Robust Production/ Low Cash Costs(3) ~225 Koz at below average cash costs ~500 Koz at below average cash costs ~90 Koz Au/85 Mlbs Cu at ~($700) cash costs(4)
RAINY RIVER BLACKWATER EL MORRO
14
Control of two underexplored districts
including recently discovered Intrepid Zone
15
RAINY RIVER
Rainy River
Existing resource Exploration targets
Intrepid Intrepid Extension Son of Intrepid Western Zone Off Lake
Control of two underexplored districts
package
Capoose ~25 km from main Blackwater resource
16
BLACKWATER
Blackwater
Capoose
Auro Van Tine Fawnie
10km
Existing resource Exploration targets
(40%) (29%) (14%) 45% 230%
Increasing Net Asset Value drives share price growth
March 2009
Net Asset Value (1)
November 2013
Mesquite, Cerro San Pedro, Peak Mines
~$875 $1,027
New Afton
~$120 $1,542
El Morro(2)
~$40 $400
Blackwater(3)
$– $720
Rainy River(4)
$– $485
17
S&P/TSX Global Gold Index(6) FTSE Gold Mines Index(7) HUI Index(8) Gold Price New Gold
PRICE PERFORMANCE SINCE BUSINESS COMBINATION WITH WESTERN GOLDFIELDS IN MARCH 2009(5)
Near-term catalysts
2013 guidance – increased resources, production growth and lower costs Blackwater resource update New Afton C-Zone exploration update Completion of Rainy River acquisition New Afton mill to reach 12,000 tonnes per day Resolution of El Morro temporary permit suspension Completion of Blackwater Feasibility Study Rainy River Feasibility Study Update Blackwater/Rainy River/New Afton exploration/resource updates New Afton throughput expansion update
18
Portfolio
in top-rated jurisdictions Invested and experienced team Among lowest-cost producers with solid track record Peer-leading growth pipeline Track record
creation
20
Appendices Page 1. Financial information 21 2. Consolidated operating performance/Q3’13 summary 27 3. New Afton 32 4. Rainy River 38 5. Blackwater 39 6. El Morro 41 7. Reserves and resource notes 47 8. Commodity price/foreign exchange assumptions 54
21
ber 30, 2013.
illion of total $150 m illion currently used for Letters of Credit.
m ary of debt for detailed breakdown of com ponents of debt.
during 2012 ($300 million at 7.00%, $500 million at 6.25%)
503 million
gold hedges on May 15, 2013
Appendix 1 Cash and Equivalents(1) Undrawn Credit Facility(2)
22
Undrawn Credit Facility Senior Unsecured Notes (April 2012) Senior Unsecured Notes (November 2012) El Morro Funding Loan Face Value $150 million(1) $300 million $500 million $76 million Maturity 1 year with annual extensions permitted April 15, 2020 November 15, 2022 n/a Interest Rate See ‘Key features’ 7.00% 6.25% 4.58% Payable Revolving credit Semi-annually Semi-annually Upon start of production Conversion price n/a n/a n/a n/a Current trading value n/a ~103 ~99 n/a Key features
covenants Interest Rate
LIBOR based on ratios
1.06%
2016 at 103.5% down to 100% of face after 2018
leverage ratio below 2:1
November 15, 2017 at par plus half coupon, declining ratably to par
leverage ratio below 2:1
repay Goldcorp
30% share of cash flow once El Morro starts production
illion currently allocated for Letters of Credit.
Appendix 1
23
future production
New Afton $110mm Peak Mines $60mm Cerro San Pedro $40mm Mesquite $20mm Blackwater $60mm New Afton $302mm Peak Mines $47mm Cerro San Pedro $11mm Mesquite $11mm Blackwater $128mm
TOTAL 2012 ACTUAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES: $499 MILLION TOTAL 2013 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE ESTIMATE: $315 MILLION
Appendix 1
Rainy River $25mm
24
Direct investment for future production
capital and direct investments for future production growth and mine life extension
New Afton - $110 million Blackwater - $60 million Peak Mines - $60 million
Annual sustaining capital 82% 18% 100% 50% 50%
related technical services
commensurate decrease in capital
camp facilities/operation
Appendix 1
25
Cerro San Pedro - $40 million Rainy River - $25 million
75% 25% 100%
phase 5 development
Direct investment for future production Annual sustaining capital
Appendix 1
Mesquite - $20 million
60% 40%
tire shops
26
New Afton 40,000 metres Peak Mines 33,000 metres Blackwater 40,000 metres
Capitalized: $15 million Expensed: $15 million Expensed: $10 million Capitalized: $5 million Expensed: $5 million
Appendix 1
27
throughput three months ahead of schedule
Lowest cost quarter in company’s history Appendix 2
aining 2.5% acquired in Q4.
28
New Afton 25 ($1,310) ($365) 62 ($1,104) ($191) Cerro San Pedro 24 $723 $771 81 $605 $674 Mesquite 21 $1,017 $1,098 72 $936 $1,162 Peak Mines 24 $856 $1,332 77 $874 $1,405 94 $280 $779 291 $399 $905
2013 THIRD QUARTER
Gold sales (000s ounces) Cash costs(1) ($/oz) All-in Sustaining costs(2) ($/oz)
2013 YEAR-TO-DATE
Gold sales (000s ounces) Cash costs(1) ($/oz) All-in Sustaining costs(2) ($/oz)
New Afton co-product cash costs(1) Gold ($/oz) $454 $526 Copper ($/lb) $1.05 $1.24
2013 THIRD QUARTER 2013 YEAR-TO-DATE
Appendix 2
29
2012 THIRD QUARTER 2013 THIRD QUARTER
Revenue ($ million) $196 $196 Earnings from mine operations ($ million) $51 $77 Net earnings ($ million) $12 $18 Net earnings per share ($/share) $0.02 $0.04 Adjusted net earnings(1) ($ million) $20 $43 Adjusted net earnings per share(1) ($/share) $0.04 $0.09 Adjusted net cash generated from operations(2) ($ million) $54 $47
Appendix 2
30
ated capital expenditures excluding expenditures related to growth-related initiatives.
Appendix 2
Total cash costs(1) ~$375/oz General and administrative ~$70/oz Exploration expense ~$80/oz Sustaining capital(2) ~$375/oz
$465 $418 $446 $421 $375 $478 $557 $643 $738 $782 $200 $400 $600 $800 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013E
31
es no change to industry average cash costs for rem ainder of 2013.
Total Cash Costs (US$/oz)(2)
New Gold offers shareholders potential for over $400 per ounce(1) of incremental margin Appendix 2
(4)
32
65 drawbells in production In West Cave East Cave production began June 2013 Accelerated East Cave development completed June 2013
Copper resource grades Planned Drawbells in 2013 Planned Future Drawbells
Appendix 3
33
To Tailings Surface Stockpile Final Concentrate Potential New Facilities
Appendix 3
34
Reserves Replacement
laterally to east
hanging wall to Main Zone
East Cave Extension Hanging Wall Lens Holes Metres Holes Metres 2013 program 34 8,253 24 9,522 2012 program 8 3,177
42 11,430 24 9,522
Appendix 3
35
HIGHLIGHTS FROM EAST CAVE DRILL PROGRAM
Drill Hole From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Gold (g/t) Copper (%)
AF13-198 19 58 39 0.17 0.38 AF13-207 41 110 69 0.50 0.69 AF13-210 44 180 136 0.25 0.66 AF13-212 46 190 144 0.18 0.75 AF13-215 236 406 170 0.67 1.47 AF13-227 216 322 106 0.21 0.59
Drill Hole From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Gold (g/t) Copper (%)
EA13-040 138 224 86 0.33 0.78 EA13-041 226 256 30 1.69 1.22 EA13-049 256 278 22 1.68 1.08 EA13-055 294 336 42 0.49 0.62 EA13-062 252 352 100 0.80 0.43 EA13-068 366 418 52 2.04 1.43 EA13-079B 294 462 168 1.21 0.70 EA13-084 3 70 67 0.54 0.15
HIGHLIGHTS FROM HANGING WALL LENS DRILL PROGRAM
Appendix 3
36
Resource Expansion
future engineering design studies
Holes Metres 2013 program 41 26,800 2012 program 26 13,900 Total to date 67 40,700
C-ZONE RESOURCE SUMMARY(1)
Measured and Indicated Inferred GOLD 0.3 Moz at 0.77 g/t 0.4 Moz at 0.62 g/t COPPER 211 Mlbs at 0.77% 301 Mlbs at 0.68%
Note: Includes all 2012 drilling plus five holes completed in early 2013
Appendix 3
ation related to resource estim ates.
37
2013 C-ZONE DRILLING HIGHLIGHTS
Drill Hole From (m) To (m) Interval (m) Gold (g/t) Copper (%)
EA13-031 644 708 64 0.86 1.33 EA13-032 478 622 144 0.92 1.10 EA13-034 744 810 66 0.90 0.93 EA13-036 592 678 86 1.51 1.66 EA13-037 566 652 86 0.66 1.38 EA13-045 526 588 62 0.85 1.13 EA13-046 722 792 70 1.13 1.06 EA13-054 504 628 124 1.08 1.52 EA13-056 740 820 80 0.70 0.48 EA13-076 372 416 44 0.54 0.96 EA13-088 514 596 82 1.95 2.57
has tripled the amount
defining the C-Zone resource
extended limits and improved classification confidence in C-Zone resource Appendix 3
38
Kenora Fort Frances Thunder Bay
Rainy River Gold Project
HWY 600 Site Topography
Appendix 4
39
infrastructure
development
project wide
~500,000 ounces
Study by late 2013
1,000 km2
ation related to resource estim ates.
gold resources – stockpile material of 0.9 million ounces
Measured and Indicated Gold Resources(1) – Direct Processing Material
Appendix 5
40
processing plant
Appendix 5
ber 2012 Prelim inary Econom ic Assessm ent.
funded by Goldcorp
deposit
underexplored
copper to reserves(1)
source to northern Chilean development projects
41
ine co-product costs estim ated at $550/oz gold and $1.45/lb copper at com m
ptions of $1,200/oz gold and $2.75/lb copper.
Location Chile Mine type Open Pit Reserves(1) – Gold/Copper (Moz/Mlbs) 2.9/2,097 Resources(1) – Gold/Copper (Moz/Mlbs) 2.9/2,097 Estimate mine life 17 years LOM production/yr (Au Koz/Cu Mlbs) 90/85 LOM cash costs/oz by-product(2) ($700)
Appendix 6
42
– Receive cash flow from start of production – Interest rate fixed at 4.58%
– Co-product gold ~$550 per ounce – Co-product copper ~$1.45 per pound
Appendix 6
43
2012 open pit Proven and Probable reserves and Measured and Indicated resources Underground Inferred resource with block cave potential
500 metres
Appendix 6
44
ates based on Decem ber 2011 Feasibility Study.
Appendix 6
Funded by $1.2 billion interest at 4.58% ~ $2.7 billion 70% 20% 80%
30% 70% 30%
Total Capital 100% ~ $3.9 billion 100% Average annual cash flow
Carried funding repayment
45
panies.
El Morro
Producing Development
Chapada Cadia-Ridgew ay Alumbrera New Afton New Prosperity Cobre Panama
Cerro Casale El Morro Agua Rica
(2)
New Afton
Appendix 6
0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.20% 0.40% 0.60% 0.80% 1.00% 1.20% Au Grade (g/t) Cu Grade (%)
46
ation taken from Goldcorp’s Decem ber 31, 2012 year-end resource statem ents.
m
EL MORRO WITHIN GOLDCORP PORTFOLIO
Asset Gold Reserves (Moz) Asset Gold Equivalent(2) (Moz) Penasquito 15.7 Penasquito 43.9 Pueblo Viejo 10.0 El Morro 17.4 Los Filos 7.4 Pueblo Viejo 11.7 El Morro 6.7 Los Filos 8.4 Cerro Negro 5.7 Cerro Negro 6.7
Appendix 6
47
ation regarding reserve and resource estim ates; refer to: New Gold’s “Annual Inform ation Form for the Financial Year Ended Decem ber 31, 2012” dated March 27, 2013; news release dated April 4, 2013 “New Gold Announces Increased Gold Resources at Blackwater Project”; news release dated May 1, 2013 “New Gold Announces 2013 First Quarter Results – Increases Gold and Copper Resources at New Afton C-Zone by Over 300 Percent”; and news release dated July 31, 2013 “New Gold Second Quarter Delivers Increased Production at Lower Costs - Second Half of 2013 Rem ains on Track to Provide Strong Finish to the Year”.
Mineral Reserves and Resources Summary Year End 2012(1)(2) Year End 2011(3) Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Proven and Probable Reserves 11,783 41,571 3,282 7,863 34,347 2,888 Measured and Indicated Resources (inclusive of Reserves) 29,242 159,585 4,223 18,797 115,268 3,946 Inferred Resources 6,822 88,359 1,187 6,323 76,856 2,202 M&I Resources (inclusive of Reserves) Mesquite 5,684
1,703 57,980
55,860
880 1,350 146 948 1,570 167 New Afton 2,224 7,292 1,980 1,742 5,470 1,586 Blackwater 9,497 70,128
25,774
196 9,497
26,594
6,167 13,338
n/a n/a El Morro 2,891
2,954
Total M&I 29,242 159,585 4,223 18,797 115,268 3,946
Appendix 7
48
Mineral Reserves statement as at December 31, 2012(1) Metal grade Contained metal Tonnes 000s Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Mesquite Proven 13,140 0.68
114,409 0.56
127,549 0.57
Proven 21,100 0.52 17.1
11,600
26,400 0.48 17.4
14,800
47,500 0.50 17.3
26,400
Proven 2,109 5.89 7.5 1.08 399 510 50 Probable 2,118 3.82 6.8 1.18 260 466 55 Peak P&P 4,227 4.85 7.2 1.13 659 976 105 New Afton Proven
52,500 0.65 2.3 0.93 1,100 3,880 1,080 New Afton P&P 52,500 0.65 2.3 0.93 1,100 3,880 1,080 Rainy River Proven 27,700 1.14 1.94
1,728
88,600 1.06 3.01
8,587
116,300 1.08 2.76
10,315
100% Basis 30% Basis
Proven 307,949 0.57
1,705
Probable 335,152 0.37
1,186
El Morro P&P 643,101 0.47
2,891
Total Proven 3,759 13,838 1,185 Total Probable 8,025 27,733 2,097 Total P&P 11,783 41,571 3,282
Appendix 7
49
Measured and Indicated mineral Resource statement (inclusive of Reserves) as at December 31, 2012(1) Metal grade Contained metal Tonnes 000s Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Mesquite Measured - oxide 19,100 0.51
274,100 0.38
293,200 0.39
4,900 0.88
96,000 0.61
100,900 0.62
394,100 0.45
Measured - oxide 27,100 0.34 15.0
13,100
49,000 0.24 13.0
20,480
76,100 0.28 13.7
33,580
15,200 0.47 11.9
5,800
60,400 0.41 9.6
18,600
75,600 0.42 10.1
24,400
151,700 0.35 11.9
57,980
Measured 2,700 5.74 7.5 1.05 494 647 62 Indicated 3,200 3.75 6.8 1.19 386 703 84 Peak M&I 5,900 4.66 7.1 1.13 880 1,350 146 New Afton A&B Zones Measured 33,500 0.86 2.9 1.18 929 3,160 873 Indicated 45,900 0.67 2.4 0.89 984 3,530 896 A&B Zone M&I 79,400 0.75 2.6 1.01 1,913 6,690 1,769 C-Zone Measured 1,282 0.75 1.4 0.79 31 56 22 Indicated 11,205 0.78 1.5 0.77 280 548 189 C-Zone M&I 12,486 0.77 1.5 0.77 311 602 211 Total New Afton M&I 91,886 0.75 2.6 1.00 2,224 7,292 1,980
Appendix 7
50
Measured and Indicated mineral Resource statement (inclusive of Reserves) as at December 31, 2012(1) Metal grade Contained metal Tonnes 000s Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Blackwater Direct processing material Measured 116,955 1.04 5.6
21,057
189,044 0.78 6.0
36,467
305,999 0.88 5.8
57,524
Measured 26,521 0.30 4.1
3,496
64,382 0.30 4.4
9,108
90,903 0.30 4.3
12,604
396,902 0.74 5.5
70,128
Indicated 14,200 0.43 20.8
9,497
Measured 27,638 1.33 1.90
1,689
130,885 1.18 2.8
11,649
158,523 1.21 2.62
13,338
100% Basis 30% Basis Measured 307,949 0.57
1,705
Indicated 335,152 0.37
1,186
El Morro M&I 643,101 0.47
2,891
Total Measured 9,477 49,005 2,092 Total Indicated 19,766 110,582 2,131 Total M&I 29,242 159,585 4,223
Appendix 7
51
Inferred Resource statement as at December 31, 2012(1) Metal grade Contained metal Tonnes 000s Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Mesquite Oxide 35,200 0.33
15,700 0.55
50,900 0.40
Oxides 53,400 0.17 9.0
15,400
50,500 0.34 8.5
13,800
103,900 0.25 8.8
29,200
1,700 2.64 4.8 1.13 144 261 42 New Afton A&B-Zone 14,900 0.45 2.0 0.65 216 940 212 C-Zone 20,221 0.62 1.4 0.68 401 923 301 New Afton Inferred 35,121 0.56 1.5 0.68 617 1,863 513 Blackwater Direct processing 13,815 0.76 4.1
1,821
3,785 0.31 3.6
438
17,600 0.66 4.0
2,263
64,070 0.29 23.2
47,789
93,804 0.76 2.32
6,983
30% Basis El Morro 137,555 0.99
1,310
Total Inferred 6,822 88,359 1,187
Appendix 7
52
Mineral reserves are contained w ithin Measured and Indicated mineral resources. Measured and Indicated mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability as defined by a technical Feasibility Study. New Gold reports its Measured and Indicated mineral resources inclusive of its mineral reserves. Inferred mineral resources are not know n w ith the same degree of certainty as Measured and Indicated resources, do not have demonstrated economic viability, and are exclusive of mineral reserves. Mineral reserves have been estimated and reported in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (‘CIM’) definition standards and guidelines and Canadian National Instrument 43-101 (‘NI 43-101’). 1) Mineral Reserves for the company’s mineral properties have been calculated based on the follow ing metal prices and low er cut-off criteria: Mineral Property Gold (US$/oz) Silver (US$/oz) Copper (US$/lb) Lower Cut-off Mesquite $1,300
0.41 g/t Au – Non-oxide reserves Cerro San Pedro $1,300 $24.00
Peak Mines $1,300 $24.00 $3.00 A$120 – 253/t NSR New Afton $1,300
US$24/t NSR El Morro $1,350
0.20% CuEq Rainy River $1,250 $25.00
3.5 g/t AuEq - Underground
Appendix 7
53
2) Mineral Resources for the company’s mineral properties have been calculated based on the follow ing metal prices and low er cut-off criteria: Mineral resources have been estimated and reported in accordance with CIM definition standards and guidelines and Canadian NI 43-101. Mineral Property Gold (US$/oz) Silver (US$/oz) Copper (US$/lb) Lower Cut-off Mesquite $1,400
0.24 g/t Au – Non-oxide resources Cerro San Pedro $1,400 $28.00
0.4g/t AuEq – Open pit sulphide resources Peak Mines $1,400 $28.00 $3.25 A$97 - 137/t NSR New Afton $1,400 $28.00 $3.25 0.40% CuEq – All resources El Morro $1,500
0.15% Cu – Open pit resources 0.20% Cu – Underground resources Blackw ater $1,400 $28.00
Capoose $1,400
Rainy River $1,100 $22.50
2.5 g/t AuEq – Underground
3) Mineral resources are classif ied as Measured, Indicated and Inf erred resources and are reported based on technical and economic parameters consistent with the methods most suitable f or their potential commercial
Additional details regarding mineral resource estimation, classif ication and reporting parameters f or each of New Gold’s mineral properties are prov ided in the respectiv e NI 43-101 Technical Reports which are av ailable
4) Blackwater April 4, 2013 update:
88.0% gold and 64.0% silv er f or oxide mineralization, 85.0% gold and 58.0% silv er f or transitional oxide/sulf ide mineralization and 85.0% gold and 44.0% silv er f or sulf ide mineralization. The 2012 y ear-end mineral resource estimate utilizes av erage metallurgical recov eries of 86% gold and 44.9% silv er f or all material ty pes.
AuEq and a 0.40 AuEq cut-of f that is suitable f or stockpiling and f uture processing based on av erage metallurgical recov eries as described in Note 1 abov e. 5) Qualif ied Person: The preparation of New Gold’s mineral reserv e and resource statements has been done by or under the superv ision of Qualif ied Persons as def ined under Canadian NI 43-101 and they were rev iewed and approv ed by Mark Petersen, a Qualif ied Person under NI 43-101 and an of f icer of New Gold. 6) For additional inf ormation regarding reserv e and resource estimates, ref er to: New Gold’s “Annual Inf ormation Form f or the Financial Year Ended December 31, 2012” dated March 27, 2013; news release dated April 4, 2013 “New Gold Announces Increased Gold Resources at Blackwater Project”; news release dated May 1, 2013 “New Gold Announces 2013 First Quarter Results – Increases Gold and Copper Resources at New Af ton C-Zone by Ov er 300 Percent”; and news release dated July 31, 2013 “New Gold Second Quarter Deliv ers Increased Production at Lower Costs - Second Half of 2013 Remains on Track to Prov ide Strong Finish to the Year”.
Appendix 7
54
Guidance assumptions(1) Spot:
2013 Gold price ($/oz) ~1,300 Silver price ($/oz) ~20.00 Copper price ($/oz) ~3.25 USD/AUD 1.00 USD/CAD 1.00 USD/MXN 13.00 Spot Gold price ($/oz) 1,320 Silver price ($/oz) 21.60 Copper price ($/oz) 3.20 USD/AUD 0.95 USD/CAD 0.96 USD/MXN 13.15
ber 30, 2013 and assum ptions for the fourth quarter of 2013: Gold - $1,300 per ounce; Copper - $3.25 per pound; Silver - $20.00 per ounce; AUD/USD and CDN/USD parity.
Appendix 8
Page 4 1. Rankings based on 25 countries evaluated in 2013 Behre Dolbear Report – 2013 Ranking of Countries for Mining Investment: “Where Not to Invest”. Page 5 1. Measured and Indicated Resources inclusive of Reserves. 2. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of Measured, Indicated and Inferred Resources” and “Technical Information”. 3. New Gold completed the acquisition of 100% of Rainy River on October 15, 2013. 4. Refer to Appendix 7 for detailed breakdow n of reserves and resources and information related to reserve and resource estimate s. Page 7 1. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. 2. Based on comparison w ith costs published by issuers listed in notes 4 and 5. The manner in w hich costs are determined may va ry from one issuer to another. 3. Refer to Endnote on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. 4. Mid-tier average includes: Alamos, Eldorado, Agnico Eagle, Aurico and IAMGOLD. 5. Senior average includes: Barrick, Goldcorp, Kinross and New mont. Page 8 1. Gold sales expected to be in the same general range as production. 2. Refer to Endnote on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. Guidance for total cash costs and all-in sustaining costs incorporates realized prices and foreign exchange rates to September 30, 2013 and assumes commodity price assumptions of: Gold - $1,300/oz; Copper - $3.25/lb; Silver - $20.00/oz for the balance of 2013. 3. Refer to Endnote on all-in sustaining costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. Page 12 1. Refer to Appendix 7 for detailed disclosure on Reserve and Resource calculations and information related to reserve and resource estimates. Page 13 1. Based on ~225Koz from Rainy River, ~500Koz from Blackw ater and ~90Koz from El Morro. Refer to slide 14 for more information. 2. Blackw ater’s potential is not supported by a feasibility study. See Endnote “Blackw ater PEA – Additional Cautionary Note”.
55
Page 14 1. Refer to Appendix 7 for detailed disclosure on Reserve and Resource calculations. 2. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of Measured, Indicated and InferredResources” and “Technical Information”. Measured and Indicated Resources are inclusive of Reserves. At Blackw ater, the 8.6 million ounces of Resources referred to ab
to be stockpiled w hich has been classified as Measured and Indicated Resource. 3. Refer to Endnote on total cash costs under the heading “Non-GAAP Measures”. Cash costs have been compared to industry data per GFMS reports w hich calculated an average, net of by-product credits, cash cost of $738 per ounce for the YE’2012. 4. Blackw ater production and cash costs based on September 2012 PEA; Rainy River production and cash costs based on April 2013 F easibility Study; and El Morro production and cash costs based on updated December 2011 Feasibility Study. Blackw ater’s potential is not supported by a feasibility study. See Endnote “Blackw ater PEA – Additional Cautionary Note”. Page 17 Source: Broker Reports, Company Estimates and Announcements, Bloomberg; all amounts in USD. 1. New Gold’s average analyst consensus NAV. 2. New Gold’s average analyst consensus NAV for El Morro; includes $50 million cash payment received from Goldcorp as part of transaction consideration. 3. New Gold acquired Richfield and Silver Quest on June 1, 2011 and December 23, 2011, respectively. 4. New Gold completed the acquisition of 100% of Rainy River on October 15, 2013. 5. New Gold share price appreciation calculated using a base price of US$1.79 from the March 3, 2009 close. 6. S&P/TSX Global Gold Index includes 54 gold companies in various stages of development/production. 7. FTSE Gold Mines Index includes 26 gold producing companies. 8. HUI Index includes 15 of the major global gold producers.
56
57
CA UTIONA RY NOTE TO U.S. REA DERS CONCERNING ESTIMA TES OF MEA SURED, INDICA TED A ND INFERRED RESOURCES Inf ormation concerning the properties and operations of New Gold has been prepared in accordance with Canadian standards under applicable Canadian securities laws, and may not be comparable to similar inf ormation f or United States companies. The terms “Mineral Resource”, “Measured Mineral Resource”, “Indicated Mineral Resource” and “Inf erred Mineral Resource” used in this presentation are Canadian mining terms as def ined in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) under guidelines set out in the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) Standards
“Inf erred Mineral Resource” are recognized and required by Canadian securities regulations, they are not def ined terms under standards of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Under United States standards, mineralization may not be classif ied as a “Reserv e” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the Reserv e calculation is made. As such, certain inf ormation contained in this presentation concerning descriptions of mineralization and resources under Canadian standards is not comparable to similar inf ormation made public by United States companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. An “Inf erred Mineral Resource” has a great amount of uncertainty as to its existence and as to its economic and legal f easibility . It cannot be as sumed that all or any part of an “Inf erred Mineral Resource” will ev er be upgraded to a higher category . Under Canadian rules, estimates of Inf erred Mineral Resources may not f orm the basis of f easibility or pre-f easibility studies. Readers are cautioned not to assume that all
economically or legally mineable. In addition, the def initions of “Prov en Mineral Reserv es” and “Probable Mineral Reserv es” under CIM standards dif f er in certain respects f rom the standards of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. TECHNICA L INFORMA TION The scientif ic and technical inf ormation in this presentation has been rev iewed and approv ed by Mark Petersen, a Qualif ied Person under National Instrument 43
Mineral Reserv es and Mineral Resources The estimates of Mineral Reserv es and Mineral Resources discussed in this presentation may be materially af f ected by env ironmenta l, permitting, legal, title, taxation, sociopolitical, marketing and other relev ant issues. In addition to our February 5, 2013, April 4, 2013 and July 31, 2013 presentations, f urther details regarding Mineral Reserv e and Resource estimates, including classif ications, key assumptions and parameters used in such estimates and other related inf ormation f or each of New Gold's mineral properties are prov ided in the respectiv e NI 43-101 Technical Reports, which are av ailable at www.sedar.com. Blackwater PEA – Additional Cautionary Note This note regarding the preliminary economic assessment (“PEA”) is in addition to cautionary language already included in this presentation as required under NI 43-101. The Blackwater PEA is preliminary in nature and includes Inf erred Mineral Resources that are considered too speculativ e geologically to hav e the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them t o be categorized as mineral reserv es, and there is no certainty that the PEA based on these mineral resources will be realized. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserv es do not hav e demonstrated economic v iability . This presentation includes inf ormation on New Gold’s PEA with respect to the Blackwater Project, which was outlined in the PEA Technical Report f iled on October 10, 2012. As disclosed in the presentation, New Gold has, since the date of the PEA, completed sev eral non-material updates of the mineral resource estimate f or the Blackwater Project. Although the PEA represents usef ul, accurate and reliable inf ormation based on the inf ormation av ailable at the time of its publication, and prov ides an important indicator as to the economic potential of the Blackwater Project, the PEA is based on mineral resources estimates with an ef f ective date of July 27, 2012, which do not ref lect drilling conducted since their ef f ective date, and the PEA does not ref lect the latest mineral resource estimate discussed in subsequent presentation. Certain assumptions used in the PEA, some of which relate to the July 27, 2012 mineral resource estimate, may hav e changed f rom those used f or the new resource estimate, causing a v ariation of parameters. Moreov er, the updated mineral resource estimate may impact how New Gold intends to dev elop the deposit, including pit outlines, production rates and mine lif e.
58
NON-GA A P MEA SURES TOTA L CA SH COSTS “Total cash costs” per ounce f igures are non-GAAP measures which are calculated in accordance with a standard dev eloped by The Gold Institute, which was a worldwide association of suppliers of gold and gold products and included leading North American gold producers. The Gold Institute ceased operations in 2002, but the s tandard is widely accepted as the standard of reporting cash costs of production in North America. Adoption of the standard is v oluntary and the cost measures presented may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. New Gold reports total cash costs on a sales basis. Total cash costs include mine site operating costs such as mining, processing, administration, roy alties and production taxes, but are exclusiv e of amortization, reclamation, capital and exploration costs. Total cash costs are reduced by any by -product rev enue and is then div ided by ounces sold to arriv e at the total by -product cash cost of sales. The measure, along with sales, is considered to be a key indicator of a company ’s ability to generate operating earnings and cash f low f rom its mining operations. This data is f urnished to prov ide additional inf ormation and is a non-IFRS measure. Total cash costs presented do not hav e a standardized meaning under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other mining companies. It should not be considered in isolation as a substitute f or measures of perf ormance prepared in accordance with IFRS and is not necessarily indicativ e of operating costs presented under IFRS. Further details regarding this measure and a reconciliation to the nearest IFRS measure is prov ided in the MD&A accompany ing the quarterly f inancial statements. A LL-IN SUSTA INING COSTS Consistent with the guidance announced earlier in 2013 f rom the World Gold Council, an association of v arious gold mining com panies f rom around the world of which New Gold is a member, New Gold def ines “all-in sustaining costs” as the sum of total cash costs, sustaining capital expenditures, corporate general & administrativ e costs, capitalized and expensed exploration that is sustaining in nature and env ironmental reclamation costs. New Gold believ es this non-GAAP measure prov ides f urther transparency into costs associated with producing gold and will assist analy sts, inv estors and other stakeholders of the company in assessing its operating perf ormance, its ability to generate f ree cash f low f rom current operations and its ov erall v alue. All-in sustaining costs constitute a non-GAAP measure and are intended to prov ide additional inf ormation only and do not hav e any standardized meaning under IFRS. They should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute f or measures of perf ormance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Other companies may calculate these measures dif f erently . Further details regarding this measure and a reconciliation to the nearest IFRS measure is prov ided in the MD&A accompany ing the quarterly f inancial statements. A DJUSTED NET EA RNINGS “Adjusted net earnings” and “adjusted net earnings per share” are non-GAAP f inancial measures. Net earnings hav e been adjusted and tax af f ected for the group of costs in “Other gains and losses” on the condensed consolidated income statement. The adjusted entries are also impacted f or tax to the extent that the underly ing entries are impacted f or tax in the unadjusted net earnings f rom continuing
perf ormance measures that are usef ul f or ev aluating the operating perf ormance of our business and a rev iew of the non-GAAP measures used by mining industry analy sts and other mining companies. Adjusted net earnings and adjusted net earnings per share are intended to prov ide additional inf ormation only and do not hav e any standardized meaning under IFRS. They should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute f or measures of perf ormance prepared in accordance with IFRS. The measures are not necessarily indicativ e of operating prof it or cash f low f rom operations as determined under IFRS. Other companies may calculate these measures dif f erently. Further details regarding this measure and a reconciliation to the nearest IFRS measure is prov ided in the MD&A accompany ing the quarterly f inancial statements. A DJUSTED NET CA SH GENERA TED FROM OPERA TIONS “Adjusted net cash generated f rom operations” is a non-GAAP f inancial measure. Net cash generated f rom operations has been adjusted f or one-time expenses related to the company ’s acquisition of Rainy Riv er in the third quarter and a one-time charge incurred in the second quarter related to the settlement of the company ’s legacy gold hedge position. The company believ es the presentation of adjusted net cash generated f rom operations enables inv estors and analy sts to better understand the underly ing operating perf ormance of our core mining business. Adjusted net cash generated f rom
perf ormance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Further details regarding this measure and a reconciliation to the nearest IFRS measure is prov ided in the MD&A accompany ing the quarterly f inancial statements.
59
Investor Relations Hannes Portmann Vice President, Corporate Development 416-324-6014 hannes.portmann@newgold.com