Rails-with-T rails: Lessons Learned Best Practices for Developing, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

rails with t rails lessons learned
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Rails-with-T rails: Lessons Learned Best Practices for Developing, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Rails-with-T rails: Lessons Learned Best Practices for Developing, Designing, and Maintaining Rails-with-Trails Blackstone River Bikeway, Lincoln/Cumberland, RI Source: Rails-to-Trails Conservancy 4/30/2019 The National Transportation Systems


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Rails-with-T rails: Lessons Learned

Best Practices for Developing, Designing, and Maintaining Rails-with-Trails

The National Transportation Systems Center Advancing transportation innovation for the public good

U.S. Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary of Transportation John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center

4/30/2019

Blackstone River Bikeway, Lincoln/Cumberland, RI Source: Rails-to-Trails Conservancy

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Outline

 Introduction  Policies and Perspectives  Development Process  Liability and Risk Management  Design  Construction, Operations, and Maintenance  For More Information

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

A shared-use path or trail open and developed for public use that is located on or directly adjacent to an active railroad or rail transit corridor.

East Boston Greenway, Boston, MA Source: US DOT Volpe Center

Rails-with-Trails:

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

343 rails-with-trails in 47 States comprising 917 miles

How many? Where are they?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Benefits and Challenges

Benefits:

  • Active Transportation
  • Health and Wellness
  • Access
  • Economic Development
  • Environmental Protection

Challenges:

  • Property acquisition
  • Concerns about safety

and liability

  • Concerns about trespassing

San Clemente Beach Trail, San Clemente, CA Source: Rails-to-Trails Conservancy

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Policies and Perspectives: Railroads

  • Half of Class I railroads have

written policies against locating trails within railroad ROW; few Class II and III railroads do.

  • Concerns:
  • Trespassing
  • Work Hazards
  • Quiet Zones
  • Liability
  • Impacts to Future Rail

Operations

Minneapolis Southwest Corridor, Minneapolis, MN Source: Southwest Journal

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Policies and Perspectives: Public Transportation Agencies

  • Few public transit agencies

have written RWT policies, but more are developing them.

  • Some see RWTs as
  • pportunities for

increasing ridership.

  • Concerns:
  • Grade Crossings
  • Fencing
  • Signage

Neponset River Greenway, Boston, MA Source: Bay Colony Rail Trail

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Policies and Perspectives: State DOTs

Sierra Bike Trail, Palmdale/Lancaster, CA Source: TrailLink User vikemaze

  • 15 State DOTs have policies,

design guidelines, or other information about RWTs.

  • Some State DOTs actively

promote RWTs; others recommend avoiding them.

  • Guidelines provide

minimum design standards, but most are meant to be flexible/adaptable.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Policies and Perspectives: Trail Builders

  • See RWTs as ways to fill

gaps in off-road nonmotorized trail networks.

  • Successful RWT developers

work closely with stakeholders to address concerns.

Great River Trail, Rock Island, IL Source: American Trails

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Best Practices: Development Process

 Locate RWTs outside of the railroad ROW, if possible.  Determine feasibility.  Conduct an environmental analysis prior to land acquisition and design.  Involve stakeholders early in the process.  Engage railroads early and often.

Downtown Lakewalk, Duluth, MN Source: American Trails

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Best Practices: Liability and Risk Management

 Conduct initial legal research early in the process.  Gather information about trespassing in the corridor.  Follow design recommendations in the forthcoming U.S. DOT report, AASHTO Guide, and MUTCD.  Consider using indemnification agreements and/or insurance to address liability.

Frisco Trail, Fayetteville, AR Source: Rails-to-Trails Conservancy

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Best Practices: Design

Regulatory and Railroad Requirements:  Adhere to all relevant Federal, State, and local regulatory requirements, as well as the requirements of the adjacent railroad.

Example: 2007 Union Pacific

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Best Practices: Design

Setback:  Set back RWTs as far as possible from railroad tracks. Consider:  Train speed, frequency, and type  Rail maintenance and

  • perations

 Track curvature  Environmental and physical constraints  Separation type  Trespassing and vandalism

Winona Interurban Trail, Winona, IN Source: Rails-to-Trails Conservancy

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Best Practices: Design

Separation:  Separation between the RWT and railroad tracks can be fencing, ditches, berms, and/or vegetation.  When fencing is needed, consider the following when selecting a fence type and height:  Setback distance  Location of grade crossings  Type, speed, and frequency

  • f trains

Whittier Greenway Trail, Whittier, CA Source: City of Whittier

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Best Practices: Design

Crossings:  Propose new at-grade crossings

  • nly where there are no other

reasonable alternatives.  Use existing road-track crossings where possible.  Include safety measures such as crossbucks, flashing lights, bells, crossing arms, and signage.  Bridges/trestles and tunnels are expensive and railroads often do not allow them.

Martin Luther King Promenade, San Diego, CA Source: American Trails

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Best Practices: Design

Accommodating Future Tracks and Sidings:  RWTs should be designed and located so as not to preclude potential future rail expansion, if anticipated.  Where corridor width, topography, and other factors allow, RWTs should be located

  • n the opposite side of the

proposed track or siding expansion.

North Cedar Lake Regional Trail, Minneapolis, MN Source: Simon Blenski, Minneapolis Public Works

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Best Practices: Design

Access to Stations:  RWTs should promote access to rail and transit stations, taking into account both accessibility and safety.  Bicycle parking should be installed near the stations in coordination with the rail or public transportation agency.

Lance Armstrong Bikeway, Austin, TX Source: Rails-to-Trails Conservancy

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Best Practices: Design

Drainage:  Consider the impact the rail-with-trail may have on the adjacent rail line’s drainage system.  In certain cases, a new drainage system might need to be installed to serve both the railroad and trail.

California Railroad Museum, Sacramento, CA Source: California Parks

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Best Practices: Construction, Operations, and Maintenance

 Coordinate with the railroad(s) prior to and during construction.  Satisfy the adjacent railroad’s requirements for safety and impacts on operations.  Have a comprehensive

  • perations and management

plan.  Conduct trail user safety and trespassing education if necessary.  Plan activities to address trespassing and vandalism.

A-Train Rail Trail, Lewisville, KY Source: Lewisville Leader

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

For More Information

The U.S. DOT Rails-with- Trails: Lessons Learned report will be released in summer 2019. Questions? Contact us at railswithtrails@dot.gov.

Thank you!

Expo Line Trail, Los Angeles, CA Source: Curbed LA