Queensland Fisheries Queensland Department of Agriculture and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

queensland
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Queensland Fisheries Queensland Department of Agriculture and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Identification and implementation of aquaculture development areas in Queensland Fisheries Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries QCA Final Report on Aquaculture Regulation in Queensland Queensland Government endorsed key


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Identification and implementation of aquaculture development areas in Queensland

Fisheries Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Queensland Government endorsed key recommendations to facilitate expansion of aquaculture in Queensland while addressing environmental concerns:

  • creation of terrestrial ADAs (450 hectares suitable for

aquaculture operations)

  • develop assessment codes (regulatory conditions for

aquaculture in each ADA)

  • provide certainty about the future price and availability of

environmental offsets

  • investigate the potential for marine aquaculture development

areas

QCA Final Report on Aquaculture Regulation in Queensland

slide-3
SLIDE 3

QCA Final Report on Aquaculture Regulation in Queensland

The Department of Agriculture and Fisheries is leading the delivery of the QCA recommendations with input from other government agencies and the aquaculture industry. The Aquaculture Advisory Committee (AAC) oversees the implementation of the recommendations endorsed by the Queensland Government. AAC Members include:

  • Australian Barramundi Farmers Association
  • Australian Prawn Farmers Association
  • Department of Agriculture and Fisheries
  • Department of Environment and Heritage Protection
  • Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning
  • Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation
  • Department of State Development
  • Department of Natural Resources and Mines
  • Queensland Treasury
  • Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO)
  • James Cook University.
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Identification of Aquaculture Development Areas (ADAs)

Target: 450ha of coastal land suitable for culturing high value marine species requiring access to seawater

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Methodology for identifying suitable locations for coastal land-based aquaculture

The planning process for ADA selection:

Phase 1 – Methodology and selection criteria Phase 2 – GIS modelling Phase 3 – Consultation and validation of GIS model Phase 4 – Technical investigations on potential ADAs Phase 5 – Recognition of ADAs Phase 6 – Release and promotion of ADAs

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Methodology for identifying suitable locations for coastal land-based aquaculture

Phase 1 – Selection criteria for identifying investigation areas

Identify opportunities and constraints

  • Physical (elevation, slope, access to water)
  • Planning (zoning, tenure)
  • Socioeconomic (landuse conflicts, native title)
  • Infrastructure (transport, labour, power)
  • Environmental (protected and environmentally significant areas)
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Methodology for identifying suitable locations for coastal land-based aquaculture

Phase 2 – Desktop GIS Modelling

  • spatial data layers (opportunities/constraints) applied to area of interest
  • areas with best combination of desirable physical characteristics and

minimal constraints are of most interest

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Proserpine - Whitsunday

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Area of Interest

Land up to 5km from coast/estuarine water supply

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Merge Slope Elevation

Distance to water

> HAT Tenure/Zoning Water quality

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Scoring

  • Zero (0) not considered
  • > 0 possible
  • highest scores most desirable
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Constraints

  • MSES
  • MSES drainage lines
  • Regulated vegetation (clearing)
  • Agricultural Land Class A/B
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Areas with least constraints

slide-14
SLIDE 14

? ? ? ? ? ? ? Where are the best areas?

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Halifax Bay Townsville

Areas with least constraints

slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Expansion opportunities for existing aquaculture operations

slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Next Steps

Refine clusters and expansion areas

  • Information layers
  • Targeted consultation (Govt agencies, LGAs and

industry)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Information Layers

  • Commonwealth constraints
  • Groundwater vulnerability
  • Access to water source/discharge area
  • Current land use
  • Prior land use/contaminated land
  • Potential land use conflicts
  • Key resource areas (KRAs)
  • Buffers (e.g. WPA trigger areas)
  • Separation distances
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Information Layers

  • Acid sulphate soils
  • Soil clay content (e.g. > 20% clay)
  • Hazard areas (e.g. Q50/Q100 flood level)
  • Floodplain assessment
  • Distance to power, transport, services, etc.
  • Native title/cultural heritage
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Information Layers – discharge issues

  • GBRMPA catchments (nutrient load limits)
  • Assimilative capacity of receiving waters
  • Environmental values/water quality
  • bjectives/management intent of receiving waters
  • Discharge limits/offsets

Which receiving waters are more/less constrained due to discharge considerations?

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Information sought from industry and local councils

  • Expansions Areas – which ones are suitable and which ones are not.
  • Greenfield sites – which ones are of interest and which ones are not.
  • Areas that have not been identified that should be investigated.
  • Seawater access. Intake/discharge points are appropriate.
  • GIS methodology/scoring is appropriate
  • additional data layers that need to be considered
  • local issues that need to be considered
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Implementation

  • Two planning options are being investigated to

implement ADAs – ADAs declared as State Development Areas – Recognition of ADAs under the State Planning Policy

  • Preferred approaches to include water quality discharge

requirements into assessment codes for each ADA are being explored – Model operating conditions – ERA standards

slide-31
SLIDE 31