Q1 Q1 2 2019 Con Conference Cal Call April 30, 2019 S U S T A - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

q1 q1 2 2019 con conference cal call
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Q1 Q1 2 2019 Con Conference Cal Call April 30, 2019 S U S T A - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Q1 Q1 2 2019 Con Conference Cal Call April 30, 2019 S U S T A I N A B L E B U S I N E S S M O D E L 2 Fo Focus cused Ex Execu cution n on n 2019 Objectives Deli Deliver t the sy e synergies es id iden entified in in our N


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Q1 Q1 2 2019 Con Conference Cal Call

April 30, 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Fo Focus cused Ex Execu cution n on n 2019 Objectives

S U S T A I N A B L E B U S I N E S S M O D E L

  • Deli

Deliver t the sy e synergies es id iden entified in in our N Newfiel eld a acquisition

  • Target: $125 million in annualized G&A savings

– Annualized G&A reductions now estimated at $150 million

  • Target: reduce STACK well cost by $1 million

– Achieved $1 million/well reduction; driving strong returns – Significant reduction in D&C cycle times – Additional cost reductions identified

  • Gener

erate e free c cash sh flow

  • wŦ and r

return urn c capital t to s shareho holders rs

  • 2019 capital guidance unchanged; higher oil prices YTD increase estimates for free cash flowŦ
  • $1.25B share buyback program underway

– YTD purchases; ~91 million shares* at an average price of $7.19 per share

  • 25% increase to dividend in Q1 2019
  • 15% Y

YOY p prof

  • for
  • rma liqui

uids gr growth f h from

  • m the

he Permian, n, A Ana nadarko a and nd Mont

  • ntne

ney

  • On track to meet full year guidance
  • Deli

Deliver E Encana’s 6 6th

th consec

secutive “ e “safest st y year e ever”

*Total repurchased as of April 29, 2019 Ŧ Non-GAAP measures defined in advisories. For additional information regarding non-GAAP measures see the Company’s website.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Strong

  • ng F

Financ ncial a and O Operationa

  • nal Perfor

formanc nce

S I G N I F I C A N T M O M E N T U M

Results lts a and Guida dance

Q1 201 1 2019 Reporta table Q1 201 1 2019 Proforma a (1)

1)

Expec ected ed Q2 – Q4 Q4 Ru Run Ra Rate Full Year Reportable Full Year Proforma CAPITAL INVESTMENT ($ MILLION) 736 736 913 913 500 500 – 800 800 2,500 – 2,700 2,700 – 2,900 TOTAL LIQUIDS (MBBLS/d) 231 231 293 293 300 300 - 320 320 290 – 310 300 – 320 NATURAL GAS (MMCF/d) 1, 1,42 421 1, 1,64 644 1,600 – 1, 1,70 700 1,500 – 1,600 1,550 – 1,650 TOTAL PRODUCTION (MBOE/d) 468 468 567 567 585 585 – 600 600 540 – 580 560 – 600 TOTAL COSTS PER BOE (2)

UPSTREAM OPERATING AND T&P, PRODUCTION AND MINERAL TAXES PLUS ADMINISTRATIVE

13. 13.44 n/ n/a <13.00 12.75 – 13.25 12.75 – 13.25

(1) Q1 2019 proforma includes Encana and Newfield upstream capital and operations prior to the acquisition close February 13, 2019. (2) Excludes the impact of long-term incentive costs and restructuring costs. BOW office lease costs are included in Administrative. (3) Includes financial basis hedges. Ŧ Non-GAAP measures defined in advisories. For additional information regarding non-GAAP measures see the Company’s website.

  • Capi

pital in investm tment a t and pr d produ ducti tion o

  • n tr

track

  • Front-half weighted capital program
  • Q1 non

non-GAAP cas cash flow

  • wŦ, exclu

ludin ing a acquis isit itio ion & & restructu turing c costs ts, to tota taled $ $566 MM MM ($0.46/sh sh)

  • Acquisition and restructuring costs of $144 MM reduce

quarterly non-GAAP cash flowŦ to $422 MM ($0.35/sh)

  • Improved G

G&A out

  • utlook
  • ok
  • Quarterly run rate of ~$75 MM
  • Market d

t diversif ific icatio tion s strate tegy a added ~ d ~$1.60/BOE t to non non-GAAP AP c cash f flo low marg rginŦ

  • Permian oil realized price3 ~98% of WTI
  • Canadian gas realized price3 ~90% of NYMEX
slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Execution R

  • n Rapidly I

y Improving ng A Anadarko R

  • Retur

urns ns

T H E E N C A N A A D V A N T A G E

Increased pad dimension accommodates drive- through access to reduce wait times and improve safety PropX sand system reduces costs, ensures supply Utilizing dual-lay flat to increase fluid to and from location Self-sourced sand and chemicals improve reliability and lower costs

Performance-driven project management at the wellsite Multiple records set during completions

  • Single day record of 115,000 bbls

pumped by one frac crew

  • Exceeded 18 hours a day pump time,

consistent with Encana Permian

Significant efficiency improvements

  • Nearly doubled stages pumped per day
  • 41% decrease in non-productive time
slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Anad nadarko

S E T T I N G N E W M I L E S T O N E S

  • Achieve

ved target eted ed $1 MM/ M/wel ell cos

  • st reduction

ion in Q Q1

  • Achieved primarily from completions

– Improved cycle time through higher pump rates

  • Supply chain management

– Self-sourcing sand and chemicals – Unbundled services – Levered multi-basin exposure to renegotiate contracts

  • First c

cube be developm

  • pment s

spud i d in A Apr pril

  • Multiple cube results expected in 2H 2019
  • Further c

r cost st redu ductions i s ide dentified

  • Additional drilling and completion efficiencies
  • Executing cube development at scale

Pa Pad Si Size Frac ac time e Q4 201 4 2018 Frac t ac time Q1 201 1 2019 % % Improvem ement ent 3-Well Pad 32 days 18 days 44% 2-Well Pad 25 days 13 days 48%

D&C Cost* Reductions YTD 2019 ($MM/well)

*Normalized to 10,000’ lateral length

Cycle Time Improvements by Pad Size

$7.90 $6.90 $0.40 $0.25 $0.20 $0.15

$5.0 $5.5 $6.0 $6.5 $7.0 $7.5 $8.0 $8.5

2018 Reduced Sand Cost Improved Completion Efficiencies Renegotiated Contracts Unbundled Services Realized Well Cost Future Well Costs

D&C Cost (MM$)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

50 100 150 200 30 60 90 120 150

Cumulative Production (MBOE) Days

Type Curve Q1 Average

Q1 2019 STACK Operated Well Performance*

Anad nadarko

R E P E A T A B L E W E L L P E R F O R M A N C E

  • 31 net

net S STACK w wel ells o

  • n-str

stream am i in Q Q1(1

(1)

  • Wells continue to meet or exceed 1.3 MMBOE type curve
  • Includes 49 gross operated STACK wells at 63% liquids
  • Q1 p

prof

  • for
  • rma p

produ

  • duction o
  • f 145 MBOE/d
  • Consi

sist stent w well r results a ts and l lowe wer c cost sts s driving g str strong r retu turns

  • Anadarko returns competitive with Permian and Montney

1.3 MMBOE type curve

* Normalized to 10,000’ lateral length, includes 49 gross wells (1) On stream wells are proforma

Recent STACK Pad Completion

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Permi mian

  • 33 n

net w wells lls o

  • n-str

stream am i in Q Q1

  • Consistent well performance across all counties
  • Q1 p

production of

  • f 91 M

MBO BOE/d

  • 3.2 MBOE/d shut-in due to third party midstream outages

– 1.9 Mbbls/d of NGLs and 8 MMcf/d of natural gas

  • ~98 M

MBOE/d i d in Apr pril

  • On track to meet full year 2019 expectations
  • Leading Permian

an B Basi sin o

  • perato

tor

  • Best in class cycle time performance
  • Growing production above ~100 MBOE/d with just 4 rigs

* Source: Drilling Info, Inc. Includes all Midland Basin wells on-stream January 1, 2018 to March 2019. Peers include CPE, CVX, CXO, Endeavor, FANG, LPI, OXY, PE, PXD, QEP, SM, and XOM ** Normalized to 8,500’ lateral length, includes 33 gross wells

L E A D I N G I N D U S T R Y

Industry Leading Cycle Time* Q1 2019 Well Performance**

50 100 150 200 30 60 90 120 150

Cumulative Production (MBOE) Days

Type Curve Q1 Average

Days (Spud – First Production)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Mo Mont ntney

  • 15 n

net w wells lls o

  • n-str

stream am i in Q Q1

  • On track for 70 – 80 net wells in 2019
  • Q1 p

production of

  • f 207 MBO

BOE/d

  • 4.3 MBOE/d shut-in due to midstream curtailments

– 1.1 Mbbls/d of liquids and 19 MMcf/d of gas

  • Q1 p

progr gram am e exceeding t g type c curve e expecta tati tions

  • Tighter clusters
  • Optimized well spacing
  • Increased frac intensity
  • Cont

ntinu nued c cycle t e time i improvement nt

  • Average well on-stream in under 80 days
  • Scheduling optimization and concurrent operations
  • Low w

w well c cost sts o

  • f ~$4.3 M

MM and a attr tracti tive r royal alty ty regime drive c competitive r retur urns ns

* Normalized to 7,900’ lateral length, includes 22 gross wells

C O M P E T I T I V E R E T U R N S

Q1 2019 Well Performance*

30 60 90 120 150 180 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 Q4 2018 Q1 2019 Days (Spud – First Production)

Continued Cycle Time Improvement

20 40 60 80 30 60 90 120 150

Cumulative Condensate Production (MBbls) Days

Type Curve Q1 Average

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Our ur 2 2019 Fo Focus cus

A P R E M I E R E & P

  • Furthe

her r reduc uctions ns i in A Ana nadarko w well c costs

  • Demons

nstrate r repeatable cube d development ent results i ts in A Anad adarko

  • Co

Complete s share bu buyback pr k program

  • Maintain

in capit ital d l discip iplin line

  • Deliver on production and capital outlooks
  • Combined 15% annualized liquids production growth in

Permian, Anadarko, and Montney

  • Gener

enerate f free ee cash flow

  • wŦ (2nd year i

in a a row) w)

  • As cash flowŦ grows, build cash on balance sheet
  • Rapi

pid i d integration

  • n o
  • f Newfield E

d Expl ploration

  • n
  • Achie

ieve ved t targeted w well c l cost r reductio ion o

  • f $1MM

in An Anadarko

  • Inc

ncrea eased p projected G G&A s saving ngs t to >$150 M MM

  • Retur

urni ning ng c capital to s shareho holders

  • Executed buyback of ~91 million shares* at an average

price of $7.19 per share

  • Increased dividend by 25%**
  • Spud

ud f first c cube development nt i in A Ana nadarko YTD A Accom ccomplis ishmen ents Upcom coming M Miles ileston

  • nes

es

Ŧ Non-GAAP measures defined in advisories. For additional information regarding non-GAAP measures see the Company’s website. * Total repurchased as of April 29, 2019. ** Declaration and payment of future dividends is subject to Board approval.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

A Prem emier er E E&P Fina nancial S Streng ength

Investment grade profile

Re Retu turn o

  • f Cap

apital

$1.25 billion share buyback and 25% increase in annual dividend*

Susta stainab able F Free Cash sh F Flow

Unique position as generator of sustainable free cash flowŦ in industry

Capit ital D l Discip iplin line

Generating free cash flowŦ & growth with significantly less capital

Fo Focus o

  • n High-Retur

urns

Multi-year track record of improving economics via operational & financial execution

Multi ti-Basi asin P Portf tfolio w with th S Scal ale

300 - 320 Mbbls/d** proforma liquids with ~75% from Permian, Anadarko and Montney

A A Prem emier E&P &P

T O D A Y ’ S E N C A N A C O R P O R AT I O N

Ŧ Non-GAAP measures defined in advisories. For additional information regarding non-GAAP measures see the Company’s website *$1.25 billion share buyback for up to 149.4 million shares, 10% of Encana’s float as at February 27, 2019. Declaration and payment of future dividends is subject to Board approval. ** Full year proforma volumes includes legacy Newfield activity from January 1 to February 13, 2019.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

APPEND ENDIX

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Strong Q Q1 Fi Financ nancial Re Resul ults

F O C U S E D O N E X E C U T I O N

  • Strong

ng e execut ution

  • n o
  • n retur

urn o n of capital(1

(1) to

  • shareh

eholder ers

  • Buyback now 61% complete

– Q1 share buyback of 55.9 MM shares with an additional repurchase of 35.1 MM shares to April 29, total of ~61% of buyback complete at $7.19 per share

  • Dividend increased 25% effective in Q1 2019
  • Int

ntegration a n and nd r re-or

  • rganization q

n quickly e y execut uted

  • Q1 results include restructuring and acquisition costs

totaling $144 MM

  • Strong u

underly lyin ing f financia ial r l result lts

  • Q1 non-GAAP cash flowŦ, excluding acquisition &

restructuring costs, totaled $566 MM ($0.46/sh)

– Acquisition and restructuring reduce quarterly non-GAAP cash flowŦ to $422 MM ($0.35/sh)

Q1 2019 1 2019

$ M Millio llions ns $ Per S r Share re

NET EARNINGS (245) $(0.20) NON-GAAP OPERATING EARNINGSŦ 165 $0.14 CASH FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES 529 n/a NON-GAAP CASH FLOWŦ 422 $0.35 CAPITAL INVESTMENT 736 n/a SHARE BUYBACK ($MILLIONS / MILLIONS OF SHARES) $400 / 55.9 WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES – DILUTED (MILLIONS) 1,221 SHARES O/S AT MARCH 31, 2019 (MILLIONS) 1,440

(1) $1.25 billion share buyback for up to 149.4 million shares, 10% of Encana’s float as at February 27, 2019. Declaration and payment of future dividends is subject to Board approval. Ŧ Non-GAAP measures defined in advisories. For additional information regarding non-GAAP measures please see the Company’s website.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Discipl iplin ined d Appr proach ch

Prior

  • rity #

y #3 - Susta tain in B Busin iness Maintain cash flowŦ and liquids production in core areas Prior

  • rity #

y #2 – Divid idends ds* Sustain current dividend Prior

  • rity #

y #1 - Fin inancial S Str trength th Manage leverage at mid-cycle prices to ~1.5x net debt to adjusted EBITDAŦ Maintain strong liquidity Investment grade credit ratings

* Declaration and payment of future dividends subject to board approval Ŧ Non-GAAP measures defined in advisories. For additional information regarding non-GAAP measures see the Company’s website

Prior

  • rity #

y #5 –Ex Excess Fr Free C Cas ash Fl FlowŦ Prior

  • rity #

y #4 – Div ivide dend G Growth th Dividend increase as sustainable free cash flowŦ grows

C A P I T A L D I S C I P L I N E

Growth investment that generates strong full-cycle returns and expands free cash flowŦ Opportunistic share buybacks Deleverage balance sheet Reduce debt

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Liquids-Fo Focus used, Mul Multi-Basin Portfo folio Strengt ength

M U L T I - B A S I N P O R T F O L I O W I T H S C A L E

ASSE SSET NET ET A ACR CRES ES 2018 PR 2018 PRODUCTION LIQUIDS % %

CO CORE RE

PERMIAN 115,000 92 MBOE/d 85% ANADARKO 361,000 135 MBOE/d 60% MONTNEY 793,000 191 MBOE/d 22%

OTH THER

EAGLE FORD 42,000 45 MBOE/d 81% WILLISTON 80,000 21 MBOE/d 84% UINTA 222,000 20 MBOE/d 87% DUVERNAY 264,000 18 MBOE/d 44%

2.0 B BBOE o

  • f P

Profo forma Proved Reserves*

  • Cor
  • re pos

positions i in t three of

  • f the t

top

  • p pl

plays i in N Nort

  • rth

America ca

  • 2.0 B

BBOE o

  • f profor
  • forma hig

igh q quali lity p prove ved r reserve ves*

  • 2018 YE Reserve Life Index (RLI) of ~10 years
  • >80% increase to RLI since 2015
  • 55% liquids

* All reserves are stated on an SEC (U.S. protocol) basis. 2.1 BBOE of proforma NI 51-101 (Canadian protocol) proved reserves.

Permian Anadarko Montney Other

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Deep eep Inventory of f High Retu eturn Growth Asset Assets

>75% of 2019F** capital directed to core growth assets 20% less capital (2019F** vs 2018*) expected to generate growth and free cash flowŦ

H I G H R E T U R N S Permian Montney Anadarko Other

201 2019F** C Capital $2. $2.7-2. 2.9B 9B

100 200 300 2016 2017 2018 2019F* Liquids Production (Mbbls/d) Permian Montney Anadarko

Conti tinued L Liquids G s Growth wth*

* Full year proforma basis above includes legacy Newfield activity. ** Full year proforma basis above includes legacy Newfield activity from January 1 to February 13, 2019. On a reportable basis, amounts for volumes, capital and expenses exclude amounts for this period. Ŧ Non-GAAP measures defined in advisories. For additional information regarding non-GAAP measures see the Company’s website.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Creating ng Val alue ue Thr hroug ugh Scal cale & Inno nnovation

M U L T I - B A S I N P O R T F O L I O W I T H S C A L E

  • Proven

en e exper ertise i in cube d e devel velopment

  • Concurrent, multi-stack development maximizes resource value and lowers well

costs

  • Higher utilization of services & infrastructure
  • Reduced D&C cycle times
  • Supply

pply c chain m management lo t lowers c costs ts, pr provide des f fle lexibility and nd e ens nsur ures a access t to

  • qua

uality s services

  • Fully offsets cost inflation with sourcing and efficiency improvements
  • Unbundling of services drives efficiencies with vendors
  • Self-sourcing commodities (local sand, water, OCTG)
  • Centraliz

lized w d water i infrastr tructu ture s solutio ions

  • D&C cost savings up to $300k/well
  • LOE savings up to ~$0.80/BOE
  • Innova

vative m ve midstrea eam a and t transport a arrangem emen ents

  • Scale enables flexible low-cost transportation and processing agreements
  • Improves realized pricing, revenues and returns
  • Market diversification creates value and manages risk

25% 25%

* Weighted average D&C cost from Duvernay, Eagle Ford, Montney, and Permian

Aver erage D e D&C c cost* t* reduct ction

  • n s

since 2015 2015

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Financi cial l Flexibi xibilit lity

F I N A N C I A L S T R E N G T H

  • Commitm

itment t to main inta tain inin ing a a strong b bala lance s sheet

  • Reduced long-term debt by nearly $3 billion from 2013 to 2018
  • Reduced long-term commitments by ~$4.3 billion from 2013 to 2018
  • Continue to manage to mid-cycle leverage target of 1.5x
  • Substa

tantia ial l l liquidit idity

  • $4.0 billion fully committed, unsecured, revolving credit facilities
  • Well dispersed long-term debt maturity profile
  • Capi

pital s str tructu ture im impr proves f free c cash flow

  • wŦ generatio

tion

  • Lowered annual interest expense on debt by $193 million from 2013 to 2018
  • Decreased cost-of-capital through scale
  • Mu

Multi lti-ba basin in m model f l favored b d by credit a it agencie ies

  • Commodity and geographic diversity reduces risk
  • Fitch and S&P recently upgraded to BBB from BBB-, Moody’s rated Ba1

7.1 4.2 2013 2018

Long-Term Debt ($B)

9.8 5.5 2013 2018

Long-Term Commitments ($B)

Ŧ Non-GAAP measures defined in advisories. For additional information regarding non-GAAP measures see the Company’s website

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

$0.0 $0.5 $1.0 $1.5 $2.0 2018 2019F Distributions to Shareholders ($B) Dividends Buyback

Re Retur urni ning Cap apital to Shar hareholders

R E T U R N O F C A P I T A L

  • Sold ~

ld ~$13 billi billion o

  • f assets s

sin ince 2013 2013

  • >80% of production and proved reserves

sold were natural gas

  • Reshape

ped po portf tfolio to to liqu liquids ds w whil ile retur urning ng cash t h to sharehol

  • lders
  • Expande

ded liqu d liquidity a and d lo lowered d leverage t to main inta tain in f flexibilit ibility t to fund d in investo tor in initi itiatives

  • Ong

ngoi

  • ing

ng c com

  • mmitment t

to

  • return

n cash t to s

  • sha

harehol

  • lders
  • $1.25 billion buyback underway*
  • 25% increase in dividend as of Q1 2019*

*$1.25 billion share buyback for up to 149.4 million shares, 10% of Encana’s float at February 27, 2019. Declaration and payment of future dividends is subject to Board approval. Q2 to date share buyback as at April 29, 2019.

  • 50

100 150

Repurchased Total Authorized

Millions of Shares Q1 Q2* Total Authorized

2018 18 – 2019F F Planne ned Retur urns ns* 2019 19 Buyback*

Average price US$7.19/share

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

2019 2019 Program

P E R M I A N

  • 75% activity focused on Midland, Martin and Upton counties
  • Continuing to innovate completion design and cube

development

* Includes plant and field condensate

FY 2019 19 PLAN

ACREAGE (net acres) / AVERAGE WORKING INTEREST % 115,000 / 92% 2019 AVERAGE WORKING INTEREST (%) 96% AVERAGE ROYALTY RATE (%) 25% CAPITAL (net) ($MM) $925 – $975 NET WELLS DRILLED 105 – 120 NET WELLS ON STREAM 105 – 120 D&C COST ($MM/well) $6.1 AVERAGE LATERAL LENGTH (ft) 8,500

TO TOTAL TAL P PRODUCTI TION S SPLIT

OIL/CONDENSATE* % 65% NGLs (C2 – C4) % 20% NATURAL GAS % 15%

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Core Growth Asset sset

  • Cube d

devel elopment nt y yields f free c cash h flow

  • wŦ an

and grow

  • wth
  • ~Tripled liquids production since acquisition (Q4 2014)
  • >500 net wells drilled
  • Basin inno

nnovator w with p h peer l leading ng p performanc nce

  • 20% reduction in D&C cost* since entering the basin in 2014

– Targeting $6.1 MM/well D&C cost in 2019

  • Spearheaded cube development
  • Pacesetting drilling times across the play
  • Leader in efficient water management
  • 201

2019F

  • $925 - 975 MM capital program
  • Load-levelled program with 4 drilling rigs
  • Continuing to innovate completion designs and cube development

* Normalized to 2019 program average lateral length of 8,500 ft ** Permian average daily production in Q4 2014. Ŧ Non-GAAP measures defined in advisories. For additional information regarding non-GAAP measures see the Company’s website

4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 2015 2019F D&C Cost* ($MM)

Driving Efficiency

P E R M I A N

**

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Midst strea eam m And M Market eting O ng Over erview

P E R M I A N

  • Majority

ty of oil produc ucti tion n gathe hered via pipeline ne with access to mult ltip iple le physic ical l marke kets

  • Firm gas gathering and

d NG NGL pr processing with access ss to Wah Waha and nd M Mont t Belv lvie ieu market ets

  • Wah

Waha basis $0.2 .25 fluctua tuation n equals less than n $3 $3 MM cash flow in Q2 2 - Q4 4 20 2019 after hed edge

  • Secur

ured market t access to Gulf Coast t refini ning/ ng/export markets ts

Permian an

Col Colorado

  • City

ty Midla dland Crane

Pipel elines es connect t to Cus ushing a and d Gulf C Coast

Proximity ty to market t and envir ironment o

  • f responsive

infrastructure d developm pment

Permi rmian (1

(1)

201 2019

WTI/MIDLAND DIFFERENTIAL HEDGES SWAP PRICE (US$/bbl) 18 Mbbls/d $(1.43)/bbl FIRM OIL MARKET ACCESS 45 Mbbls/d WAHA BASIS HEDGES SWAP PRICE (US$/Mcf) 55 MMcf/d $(0.54)/Mcf

(1) Q2 - Q4 2019 risk management positions as at March 31, 2019. Hedged volumes are converted to Mcf at a 1:1 ratio from MMBtu.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

2019 2019 Program

A N A D A R K O

  • >90% program focused in Kingfisher, Blaine and Canadian

Counties

  • Cube development expected to unlock significant synergies via

reduced well costs and improved capital efficiency

  • $1 MM per well savings achieved, further savings identified
  • Supply chain management and self-sourcing of services expected

to unlock additional returns

* Includes plant and field condensate ** Full year proforma basis above includes legacy Newfield activity from January 1 to February 13, 2019. On a reportable basis, amounts for volumes, capital (~$140MM) and expenses exclude amounts for this period.

FY 2019 19 PLAN**

ACREAGE (net acres) / AVERAGE WORKING INTEREST % 361,000 / ~57% 2019 AVERAGE WORKING INTEREST (%) 70% AVERAGE ROYALTY RATE (%) 17 – 20% CAPITAL (net) ($MM) $800 - $850 NET WELLS DRILLED 65 – 75 NET WELLS ON STREAM 95 – 105 2018 AVERAGE D&C COST ($MM/well) $7.9 TARGETED D&C COST ($MM/well) $6.9 LATERAL LENGTH (ft) 10,000

TO TOTAL TAL P PRODUCTI TION S SPLIT

OIL/CONDENSATE* % 38% NGLs (C2 – C4) % 25% NATURAL GAS % 37%

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Core Growth Asset sset

  • Liqu

quids ds g growth and f d free c cash flow

  • wŦ genera

rator

  • 134,800 BOE/d, 60% liquids in 2018
  • ~100% of core lands held by production
  • Targeti

ting $ g $1 M MM well c cost r st reducti tion

  • Cube development drilling to commence in early Q2
  • ~$6.9 MM/well D&C cost* in 2H 2019: further well cost savings

identified

  • 201

2019F**

  • $800 - 850 MM capital program
  • Pivot to load-levelled program with 4 drilling rigs
  • Capital focused on STACK

* Normalized to 10,000 ft lateral length ** Full year combined basis above includes legacy Newfield activity from January 1 to February 13, 2019. On a reportable basis, amounts for volumes, capital (~$140MM) and expenses exclude amounts for this period. Ŧ Non-GAAP measures defined in advisories. For additional information regarding non-GAAP measures see the Company’s website.

A N A D A R K O

D&C Cost* ($MM/well) Growing Production**

$7.90 $6.90 $0.40 $0.25 $0.20 $0.15

$5.0 $5.5 $6.0 $6.5 $7.0 $7.5 $8.0 $8.5

2018 Reduced Sand Cost Improved Completion Efficiencies Renegotiated Contracts Unbundled Services Realized Well Cost Future Well Costs

D&C Cost (MM$)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Midst strea eam m And M Market eting O ng Over erview

A N A D A R K O

  • Majority

ty of oil produc ucti tion n gathe hered via pipeline ne with th direct t access to Cushing ng markets ts

  • Se

Segre regated WTI oil stre ream m prov

  • vides premi

mium m pricing at t Cus ushing ng

  • Firm NGL processing

ng with th access to Mont nt Belv lvie ieu

  • Firm gas trans

nsport t with th access to Perryville/Gul ulf Coast t market t

Cushin ing

Natural Gas Pipeline Crude Oil Pipeline To Perryville

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

2019 2019 Program

M O N T N E Y

  • Investment aligned with local market conditions
  • ~Balanced activity between Cutbank Ridge Partnership (60%

partnership interest) and Pipestone (100% working interest)

  • ~C$100 MM of remaining third party capital to be fully

consumed within Cutbank Ridge Partnership

FY 2019 19 PLAN

ACREAGE (net acres) / AVERAGE WORKING INTEREST % 793,000 / 64%

  • PIPESTONE ACREAGE / WI %

89,000 / 100% 2019 AVERAGE WORKING INTEREST (%) 72% AVERAGE ROYALTY RATE (%) 5 – 10% CAPITAL (net) ($MM) $350 – $400 NET WELLS DRILLED 60 – 70 NET WELLS ON STREAM 70 – 80 D&C COST ($MM/well) $4.3 AVERAGE LATERAL LENGTH (ft) 7,900

TO TOTAL TAL P PRODUCTI TION S SPLIT

OIL/CONDENSATE* % 18% NGLs (C2 – C4) % 7% NATURAL GAS % 75%

* Includes plant and field condensate

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Core Growth Asset sset

  • Self

lf-fund funded m multi-year l liquids g s growt wth

  • More than tripled liquids production since 2015
  • >275 net wells drilled since 2015
  • Basi

sin-lead ading c cost a st and p producti tivity ty p performance

  • >30% reduction in D&C cost* since 2015

– Targeting $4.3 MM/well D&C cost in 2019

  • 201

2019F

  • $350 - 400 MM capital program
  • Load-levelled program with 4 drilling rigs
  • Investment aligned with local market conditions

* Normalized to lateral length of 7,900 ft ** Excludes divested volumes in 2015 and 2016

  • 10

20 30 40 50 60 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019F Liquids (Mbbls/d)

Growing Liquids**

2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 2015 2019F D&C Cost* ($MM)

Driving Efficiency

M O N T N E Y

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Midst strea eam m And M Market eting O ng Over erview

M O N T N E Y

To US Northwest To Dawn To Chicago Condensate Imports 100% 00% f firm capac acit ity o

  • n

Nova va G Gas Transm smissi ssion Syste tem (NGTL) L) Conde densa sate so sold i d into premi mium m local m al marke ket Natural Gas Pipeline Condensate Pipeline

We Western Can anad ada (1) 2019 19 – 2020 20

AECO BASIS HEDGES SWAP PRICE US$/Mcf*

455 MMcf/d $(0.88)/Mcf

TRANSPORT TO DAWN

316 MMcf/d

TRANSPORT TO SUMAS / MALIN

130 MMcf/d

TRANSPORT TO CHICAGO

100 MMcf/d

(1 ) Q2-Q4 2019 and full year 2020 risk management positions as at March 31, 2019 * Price stated is the differential versus NYMEX pricing. Hedged and transport volumes are converted to Mcf at a 1:1 ratio from MMBtu.

  • Combination of

f fi firm exp xport cap apacity an and bas asis hedges to man anage AEC ECO gas as price* risk

  • Realized price including hedge expected to be ~$0.50 below NYMEX in

2019

  • AECO US$0.25 fluctuation equals less than US $15MM cash flow in 2019

Q2-Q4 after hedge

  • 100% fi

firm cap apacity secured on NGTL fo for exp xpected produc ucti tion n growth h – limite ted curta tailment nt risk

  • Con
  • ndensate sold into local ma

market at ~WTI pri rices

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28 25 50 75 100 125 2018 2019F MBOE/d

Optimizing Free Cash FlowŦ

Duvernay Uinta Williston Eagle Ford

Oth Other Asset Assets

O P T I M I Z I N G F R E E C A S H F L O W

FY 2 2019 PLAN* EA EAGLE F E FORD WILLI LLISTON DUVE UVERNAY UINTA TA

ACREAGE (net acres) / AVERAGE WORKING INTEREST (%) 42,000 / 96% 80,000 / 59% 264,000 / 51% 222,000 / 80% 2019 AVG WORKING INTEREST (%) 86% 70% 51% 70% AVERAGE ROYALTY RATE (%) 20 – 25% 17 – 20% 5 – 10% 17 – 20% CAPITAL (net) ($MM) $250 – 280 $110 – 130 $100 – 120 $50 – 70

TO TOTAL TAL P PRODUCTI TION S SPLIT* T*

OIL/CONDENSATE** % 66% 70% 36% 83% NGLs (C2 – C4) % 15% 13% 6% 3% NATURAL GAS % 19% 17% 58% 14%

  • 80% of capital weighted to 1H 2019
  • Maximizes rig and frac spread utilization
  • Focused D&C capital with minimal infrastructure

and non-well capital requirements

  • Wells drilled generate similar returns as Core 3

Ŧ Non-GAAP measures defined in advisories. For additional information regarding non-GAAP measures see the Company’s website * Full year proforma basis above includes legacy Newfield activity from January 1 to February 13, 2019. ** Includes plant and field condensate

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Type Curve rves

C O R E G R O W T H A S S E T S Play ay IP30 (BOE/d /d) IP180 (BOE/d /d) EUR/We Well (Mbbls) EUR/ R/Well ( (MBOE) GOR OR ( (scf cf/bbl)

Permian Basin1

Midland/Upton 985 700 610 1,020 2,800 Martin 950 650 675 1,000 2,000 Howard 825 600 550 875 2,450 Glasscock 800 550 530 765 1,960

Anadarko2

STACK 1,300 850 860 1,300 5,800

Montney3

CGR ( (bbls/MMc MMcf) Pipestone 800 1,000 525 950 150 - 300 Tower Very Rich Gas Condensate 1,400 1,000 300 750 100 - 200 Tower Gas Condensate 1,400 1,300 300 1,800 20 - 50 Dawson South 1.850 1,800 400 2,100 30 - 50

(1)Type curves are stated on a three stream basis with an average lateral length of 7,500’. (2) Type curves are stated on a three stream basis with an average lateral length of 10,000’. (3) Type curves are stated on a shrunk condensate and a raw gas basis with lateral lengths of 8,200 - 9,800’.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Cost Effec ective W e Water er M Managem gement ent

L E V E R A G I N G S C A L E Permia ian – Martin in C County Water H Hub

  • Ar

Area s spe pecific solu luti tions

  • Permian

– Combination Encana-owned low-cost water hubs and third party providers – Recycled >50% of produced water in 2018

  • Anadarko

– 30,000 barrel per day Barton water recycling and treatment facility – >75 miles of permanent pipe and >13 MMbbls of water storage

  • Montney

– Non-potable water sourced from deep formations recycled through two centralized facilities

  • Improves capita

pital e l efficie iency a and de-ris isks s supply ly

  • Redu

ducing a all ll-in w water ha hand ndling & & sour

  • urcing c

cos

  • sts
  • D&C cost savings up to $300k/well
  • LOE savings up to ~$0.80/BOE

Anadark rko - Barto ton Water T Treatm tment F t Facility ty Montney y – Stor

  • rage Re

Reservoi

  • ir
slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Reconcilia iliatio tion o

  • f Full Y

l Year G Guida dance t to Report rtable ble

2 0 1 9 G U I D A N C E

Reportable: ECA plus Newfield post close February 13, 2019 Impact of Newfield Jan 1 – Feb 13, 2019: Newfield activity January 1, 2019 – February 13, 2019 Full year proforma: Results of ECA + Newfield combined for all of 2019

2019 G Guidan ance ce: R : Reportab able V Versus F Full Y Year ar

2019 Reportable Guidance Impact of Newfield Jan 1 - Feb 13, 2019 Full Y ll Year Proforma CAPITAL INVESTMENT ($ BILLION) 2.5 – 2.7 0.2 2.7 – 2.9 .9 TOTAL LIQUIDS (MBBLS/d) 290 – 310 15 300 300 – 320 320 NATURAL GAS (MMCF/d) 1,500 – 1,600 55 1,550 – 1, 1,65 650 TOTAL PRODUCTION (MBOE/d) 540 – 580 24 560 560 – 600 600 TOTAL COSTS PER BOE*

UPSTREAM OPERATING AND T&P, PRODUCTION AND MINERAL TAXES PLUS ADMINISTRATIVE

12.75 – 13.25

  • 12.75 – 13.

13.25

* Excludes the impact of long-term incentive costs and restructuring costs. Bow office building lease costs are included in these combined costs.

  • Per unit costs expected to fall through the year
  • Excludes Q1 acquisition and restructuring costs

incurred in 2019 at $144 million

  • 2.00

4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 2018PF 2019F

$/BOE

G&A Excl. LTI and Restr. Costs PMOT Upstream T&P Upstream Opex

  • Excl. LTI
slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

Max Maximizing ng Mar Margin

C O S T C O N T R O L O F C O R P O R AT E I T E M S E N H A N C E S P E R U N I T M A R G I N

  • G&A >3

>30% lower on a per er BO BOE1

1 basis

is

  • On track for $150 million in annualized G&A savings, increased by

$25 million versus original estimate

  • Lower quar

arterly G&A &A run rat ate fo for remainder of f year: ~$75 MM down

  • wn from
  • m prior
  • r estimate of ~$90 MM
  • Run-rate G&A costs include approximately $25 MM per quarter for

the BOW lease costs, previously classified in interest expense and corporate segment operating costs

  • About 50% of BOW related costs included in G&A are recovered

through sub-lease revenues

  • Excluding the impact of the Bow office cost reclassification, quarterly

run-rate G&A costs are down from $65 MM previous estimate to ~$50 MM

  • Market

t optimizati tion n segm gment nt loss of ~$40 MM per quarte ter

  • Interes

est expen ense e on debt of ~$100 100 MM per quarter er

(1) G&A per BOE includes the impact of Bow office related costs and excludes LTI’s (2) Full year proforma basis above includes legacy Newfield activity in 2018 and 2019; 2019F excludes $113 MM of restructuring costs in Q1 2019

  • 0.50

1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 150 300 450 600 2018 2019F $/BOE $MM Bow Related Costs G&A Excl. LTI G&A per BOE

Lower Total G&A2

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

Product Val alue ue Chai Chain n Ex Excl cluding ng He Hedge

P R O J E C T E D C O M P O S I T I O N O F T O TA L P R O D U C T I O N

(1) 2019F based on company guidance as at February 28, 2019, excluding impact of hedges; production ranges are not additive; (2) US Oil production range includes estimated volumes for China (3) Includes plant condensate

Canada US US

2019F (1) (Mbbls/d) 2019F Pricing (% WTI) 2019F(1) (Mbbls/d) 2019F Pricing (% WTI)

Oil (2) 0 – 1 70% 175 – 180 98% Condensate (3) 40 – 43 89% 9 – 11 80% Butane 6 – 8 19% 12 – 13 50% Propane 7 – 9 24% 23 – 26 40% Ethane 0 – 1 18% 29 – 31 12% Canada US US

2019F(1) (MMcf/d) 2019F Pricing (% NYMEX) 2019F(1) (MMcf/d) 2019F Pricing (% NYMEX)

Natural Gas 950 – 1,050 73% 550 – 650 75%

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

He Hedging ng Sum ummar ary

M I D S T R E A M A N D M A R K E T I N G

(1) Rest of year sensitivity based on mid-point of guidance volumes (2) Risk management positions as at March 31, 2019 (3) Hedged volumes are converted to Mcf at a 1:1 ratio from MMBtu Ŧ Non-GAAP measures defined in advisories. For additional information regarding non-GAAP measures see the Company’s website.

  • WTI O

I Oil il

  • ~$250 MM per $5.00/bbl increase in NYMEX WTI to 2019

Q2-Q4 cash flowŦ after hedge (1)

  • Majority of oil hedges through option based structures

allows for upside capture to ~$70.00/bbl

  • NYM

YMEX G X Gas

  • ~$55 MM per $0.25/Mcf change in NYMEX gas to 2019

Q2-Q4 cash flow after hedge

  • Foreign E

Exchan ange ge

  • ~$15 MM per $0.05 change in F/X to 2019 Q2-Q4 cash

flow after hedge

BENCHM HMARK RK H HEDGE GES 2019 2019(2)

2)

Oil a and C Condensate WTI FIXED PRICE SWAP SWAP PRICE (US$/bbl) 35 Mbbls/d $60.31/bbl WTI 3-WAY OPTION SHORT PUT (US$/bbl) LONG PUT (US$/bbl) SHORT CALL (US$/bbl) 61 Mbbls/d $48.15/bbl $58.96/bbl $68.74/bbl WTI COSTLESS COLLAR LONG PUT (US$/bbl) SHORT CALL (US$/bbl) 10 Mbbls/d $55.00 $64.37 Natural al G Gas as NYMEX FIXED PRICE SWAP (3) SWAP PRICE US$/Mcf (3) 892 MMcf/d $2.75/Mcf NYMEX COSTLESS COLLAR LONG PUT (US$/Mcf) SHORT CALL (US$/Mcf) 66 MMcf/d $2.91/Mcf $3.06/Mcf Forei eign gn E Excha hange nge Notional US$ Currency Swaps Average Exchange Rate US$ to C$1 US$750 MM US$0.7516

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Di Disci ciplined Fi Financi nancial Mana Management

D E B T P O R T F O L I O A S AT M A R C H 3 1 , 2 0 1 9

  • Total d

debt r reduced b by ~$3 $3 billion s since Y Y/E 2013 t 13 to Y Y/E 2018 18

  • Signif

ificant f financial f l flexibilit ility

  • Well-di

dispe persed d maturit ity p profile le

  • Multi

ti-basin m model el favor vored ed b by c cred edit agen encie ies

  • $4.0B f

fully c commit itted, u unsecured, r revolv lvin ing c credit it f facili ilitie ies

250 500 750 1,000 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041

(US$ MM)

Fixed Debt Maturity Schedule

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

FUTURE E ORIEN ENTED ED INFORMA MATION

  • meeting or exceeding Encana’s corporate guidance
  • anticipated capital program, including focus of development and allocation thereof, number of wells on

stream, level of capital productivity, expected return and source of funding

  • anticipated production, including growth from core assets, cash flow, free cash flow, capital coverage, payout,

profit, net present value, rates of return, recovery, return on capital employed, production and execution efficiency, operating, income and cash flow margin, and margin expansion, including expected timeframes

  • well performance, completions intensity, location, running room and scale of assets, including its

competitiveness and pace of growth against peers

  • number of potential drilling locations, well spacing, number of wells per pad, decline rate, rig count, rig

release metrics, focus and timing of drilling, anticipated vertical and horizontal drilling, cycle times, commodity composition, gas-oil ratios and operating performance compared to type curves

  • pacesetting metrics being indicative of future well performance and costs, and sustainability thereof
  • timing, success and benefits from innovation, cube development approach, advanced completions design,

scale of development, high-intensity completions and precision targeting, and transferability of ideas

  • anticipated efficiencies and synergies, including drilling and completion cycle times, operating, corporate,

transportation and processing, staffing, services and materials secured and supply chain management

  • leading positions and quality of plays in North America
  • anticipated reserves and resources, including product types and stacked resource potential
  • expected transportation and processing capacity, commitments, curtailments and restrictions, including

flexibility of commercial arrangements and costs and timing of certain infrastructure being operational

  • anticipated return of capital model and priorities therein, management of balance sheet and credit rating,

access to liquidity, available cash, and return of capital including anticipated dividends and size and timing of share buyback

  • expected net debt, net debt to adjusted EBITDA, target leverage, financial capacity and other debt metrics
  • ptions to maximize shareholder returns and timing thereof
  • commodity price outlook
  • utcomes of risk management program, including exposure to commodity prices and foreign exchange,

amount of hedged production, market access, market diversification strategy and physical sales locations

  • environmental, health and safety performance

FLS involve assumptions, risks and uncertainties that may cause such statements not to occur or results to differ materially. These assumptions include: future commodity prices and differentials; foreign exchange rates; assumptions contained in corporate guidance and as specified herein; data contained in key modeling statistics; availability of attractive hedges and enforceability of risk management program; results from innovations; expectation that counterparties will fulfill their obligations; access to transportation and processing facilities; assumed tax, royalty and regulatory regimes; and expectations and projections made in light of Encana's historical experience and its perception of historical trends. Risks and uncertainties include: integration of Encana and Newfield and the ability to recognize the anticipated benefits; ability to generate sufficient cash flow to meet obligations; commodity price volatility; ability to secure adequate transportation and potential pipeline curtailments; variability and discretion to declare and pay dividends, if any; amount and timing of share repurchases; timing and costs of well, facilities and pipeline construction; business interruption, property and casualty losses or unexpected technical difficulties; counterparty and credit risk; changes in credit rating and its impact on access to liquidity; currency and interest rates; risks inherent in corporate guidance; failure to achieve cost and efficiency initiatives; risks in marketing operations; risks associated with technology; changes in or interpretation of laws or regulations; risks associated with existing and potential lawsuits and regulatory actions; impact of disputes arising with partners, including suspension of certain obligations and inability to dispose of assets or interests in certain arrangements; ability to acquire or find additional reserves; imprecision of reserves estimates and estimates of recoverable quantities and future net revenue; risks associated with past and future acquisitions or divestitures of certain assets or other transactions or receipt of amounts contemplated under the transaction agreements (such transactions may include third-party capital investments, farm-outs or partnerships, which Encana may refer to from time to time as “partnerships” or “joint ventures” and the funds received in respect thereof which Encana may refer to from time to time as “proceeds”, “deferred purchase price” and/or “carry capital”, regardless of the legal form) as a result of various conditions not being met; and other risks and uncertainties, as described in Encana’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and as described from time to time in Encana’s other periodic filings as filed on SEDAR and EDGAR. Although Encana believes such FLS are reasonable, there can be no assurance they will prove to be correct. The above assumptions, risks and uncertainties are not exhaustive. FLS are made as of the date hereof and, except as required by law, Encana undertakes no obligation to update or revise any FLS. Certain future oriented financial information or financial outlook information is included in this presentation to communicate current expectations as to Encana’s performance. Readers are cautioned that it may not be appropriate for other purposes. Rates of return for a particular asset or well are on a before-tax basis and are based on specified commodity prices with local pricing

  • ffsets, capital costs associated with drilling, completing and equipping a well, field operating expenses and certain type curve assumptions. Pacesetter well costs for a particular asset are a composite of the best drilling performance

and best completions performance wells in the current quarter in such asset and are presented for comparison purposes. Drilling and completions costs have been normalized as specified in this presentation based on certain lateral lengths for a particular asset. For convenience, references in this presentation to “Encana”, the “Company”, “we”, “us” and “our” may, where applicable, refer only to or include any relevant direct and indirect subsidiary corporations and partnerships (“Subsidiaries”) of Encana Corporation, and the assets, activities and initiatives of such Subsidiaries. This presentation contains forward-looking statements or information (collectively, “FLS”) within the meaning of applicable securities legislation, including Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. FLS include:

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

ADVISORY Y REGARDING G OIL & GAS INFORMATION

All reserves estimates in this presentation are effective as of December 31, 2018, prepared by qualified reserves evaluators in accordance with procedures and standards contained in the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation ("COGE") Handbook, National Instrument 51-101 (NI 51-101) and SEC regulations, as applicable. On August 14, 2017, Encana was granted an exemption by the Canadian Securities Administrators from the requirements under NI 51-101 that each qualified reserves evaluator or qualified reserves auditor appointed under section 3.2 of NI 51-101 and who execute the report under Item 2 of Section 2 of NI 51-101 be independent of Encana. Detailed Canadian and U.S. protocol disclosure will be contained in the Form 51-101F1 and Annual Report on Form 10-K, respectively. Information on the forecast prices and costs used in preparing the Canadian protocol estimates are contained in the Form 51-101F1. For additional information relating to risks associated with the estimates of reserves, see "Item 1A. Risk Factors" of the Annual Report on Form 10-K. Reserves are the estimated remaining quantities of oil and natural gas and related substances anticipated to be recoverable from known accumulations, from a given date forward, based on: analysis of drilling, geological, geophysical and engineering data, the use of established technology, and specified economic conditions, which are generally accepted as being reasonable. Proved reserves are those reserves which can be estimated with a high degree of certainty to be recoverable. It is likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the estimated proved reserves. Encana uses the terms play and resource play. Play encompasses resource plays, geological formations and conventional plays. Resource play describes an accumulation of hydrocarbons known to exist over a large areal expanse and/or thick vertical section, which when compared to a conventional play, typically has a lower geological and/or commercial development risk and lower average decline rate. As used by Encana, estimated ultimate recovery (“EUR”) has the meaning set out jointly by the Society of Petroleum Engineers and World Petroleum Congress in the year 2000, being those quantities of petroleum which are estimated, on a given date, to be potentially recoverable from an accumulation, plus those quantities already produced therefrom. Encana has provided information with respect to its assets which are “analogous information” as defined in NI 51-101, including estimates of EUR and production type

  • curves. This analogous information is presented on a basin, sub-basin or area basis utilizing data derived from Encana's internal sources, as well as from a variety of publicly available information sources which are predominantly

independent in nature. Production type curves are based on a methodology of analog, empirical and theoretical assessments and workflow with consideration of the specific asset, and as depicted in this presentation, is representative

  • f Encana’s current program, including relative to current performance, but are not necessarily indicative of ultimate recovery. Some of this data may not have been prepared by qualified reserves evaluators, may have been prepared

based on internal estimates, and the preparation of any estimates may not be in strict accordance with COGEH. Estimates by engineering and geo-technical practitioners may vary and the differences may be significant. Encana believes that the provision of this analogous information is relevant to Encana's oil and gas activities, given its acreage position and operations (either ongoing or planned) in the areas in question, and such information has been updated as of the date hereof unless otherwise specified. Due to the early life nature of the various emerging plays discussed in this presentation, EUR is the most relevant specific assignable category of estimated resources. There is no certainty that any portion of the resources will be discovered. There is no certainty that it will be commercially viable to produce any portion of the estimated EUR. Estimates of Encana potential gross inventory locations, including premium return well inventory, include proved undeveloped reserves, probable undeveloped reserves, un-risked 2C contingent resources and unbooked inventory locations. As of December 31, 2018, on a proforma basis, 2,012 proved undeveloped locations, 3,844 probable undeveloped locations and 3,265 un-risked 2C contingent resource locations (in the development pending, development on-hold or development unclarified project maturity sub-classes) have been categorized as either reserves or contingent resources. Unbooked locations have not been classified as either reserves or resources and are internal estimates that have been identified by management as an estimation of Encana's multi-year potential drilling activities based on evaluation of applicable geologic, seismic, engineering, production, resource and acreage information. There is no certainty that Encana will drill all unbooked locations and if drilled there is no certainty that such locations will result in additional oil and gas reserves, resources or production. The locations on which Encana will actually drill wells, including the number and timing thereof is ultimately dependent upon the availability of capital, regulatory and partner approvals, seasonal restrictions, equipment and personnel, oil and natural gas prices, costs, actual drilling results, additional reservoir information that is obtained, production rate recovery, transportation constraints and other factors. While certain of the unbooked locations may have been de-risked by drilling existing wells in relative close proximity to such locations, many of other unbooked locations are farther away from existing wells where management has less information about the characteristics of the reservoir and therefore there is more uncertainty whether wells will be drilled in such locations and if drilled there is more uncertainty that such wells will result in additional proved or probable reserves, resources or production. 30-day IP and other short-term rates are not necessarily indicative of long-term performance or of ultimate recovery. The conversion of natural gas volumes to barrels of oil equivalent (“BOE”) is on the basis of six thousand cubic feet to

  • ne barrel. BOE is based on a generic energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent economic value equivalency at the wellhead. Readers are cautioned that BOE may be

misleading, particularly if used in isolation.

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

NO NON-GAA GAAP MEASU ASURES

Certain measures in this presentation do not have any standardized meaning as prescribed by U.S. GAAP and, therefore, are considered non-GAAP measures. These measures may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. These measures have been provided for meaningful comparisons between current results and other periods and should not be viewed as a substitute for measures reported under U.S. GAAP. For additional information regarding non-GAAP measures, including reconciliations, see the Company’s website and Encana’s most recent Annual Report as filed on SEDAR and EDGAR. Non-GAAP measures include:

  • Non-GAAP

AAP Cas ash Flow, w, Non-GAAP AAP Cas ash Fl Flow Pe Per Shar are (C (CFPS), Non-GAA AAP Free ee Cas ash Flow an and Non-GAAP AAP Cas ash Fl Flow Margin – Non-GAAP Cash Flow (or Cash Flow) is defined as cash from (used in) operating activities excluding net change in other assets and liabilities, net change in non-cash working capital and current tax on sale of assets. Non-GAAP CFPS is Non-GAAP Cash Flow divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Non-GAAP Free Cash Flow (or Free Cash Flow) is Non-GAAP Cash Flow in excess of capital expenditures, excluding net acquisitions and divestitures. Non-GAAP Cash Flow Margin is Non-GAAP Cash Flow per BOE of production. Management believes these measures are useful to the company and its investors as a measure of operating and financial performance across periods and against other companies in the industry, and are an indication of the company’s ability to generate cash to finance capital programs, to service debt and to meet other financial

  • bligations. These measures may be used, along with other measures, in the calculation of

certain performance targets for the company’s management and employees.

  • Tota

tal Costs ts per per BOE OE is defined as the summation of production, mineral and other taxes, upstream transportation and processing expense, upstream

  • perating

expense and administrative expense, excluding the impact of long-term incentive and restructuring costs, per BOE of production. Management believes this measure is useful to the company and its investors as a measure of operational efficiency across periods.

  • Non-GAAP

AAP Opera ratin ing Earn rnin ings (L (Loss) – is defined as Net Earnings (Loss) excluding non- recurring or non-cash items that management believes reduces the comparability of the company’s financial performance between periods. These items may include, but are not limited to, unrealized gains/losses on risk management, impairments, restructuring charges, non-operating foreign exchange gains/losses, gains/losses on divestitures and gains on debt

  • retirement. Income taxes may include valuation allowances and the provision related to the

pre-tax items listed, as well as income taxes related to divestitures and U.S. tax reform, and adjustments to normalize the effect of income taxes calculated using the estimated annual effective income tax rate.

  • Ne

Net Deb ebt, Adju just sted EBITDA DA an and Net Debt ebt to to Adjusted ed EBITDA DA – Net Debt is defined as long- term debt, including the current portion, less cash and cash equivalents. Management uses this measure as a substitute for total long-term debt in certain internal debt metrics as a measure of the company’s ability to service debt obligations and as an indicator of the company’s overall financial strength. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as trailing 12-month net earnings (loss) before income taxes, DD&A, impairments, accretion of asset retirement

  • bligation,

interest, unrealized gains/losses

  • n

risk management, foreign exchange gains/losses, gains/losses on divestitures and other gains/losses. Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA is monitored by management as an indicator of the company’s overall financial strength.

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Contact I Invest vestor R Relations: s: 403.645.3550 | | 2 281.210.5110 | | i investor.relations@encana.com