PYP Requirements Slides Prepared by: Dr. Quail Middlebrooks: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

pyp requirements slides
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

PYP Requirements Slides Prepared by: Dr. Quail Middlebrooks: - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

North Atlanta Cluster PYP Requirements Slides Prepared by: Dr. Quail Middlebrooks: Coordinator, Gifted and Talented Kasele Mshinda: Coordinator, 6-12 Mathematics John Denine: Coordinator, College and Career Readiness Charter System


slide-1
SLIDE 1

North Atlanta Cluster PYP Requirements Slides

Prepared by:

  • Dr. Quail Middlebrooks: Coordinator, Gifted and Talented

Kasele Mshinda: Coordinator, 6-12 Mathematics John Denine: Coordinator, College and Career Readiness

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Charter System Implementation

2

Domain

Autonomy Now (now-2017) Future Autonomy (2017-2018…Pending Budget) Future Autonomy (2018+)

Personnel

 Flexibility to convert positions to dollars or other positions  Change the number and type of staff  Hire candidates of choice and redefine/expand roles  Interview and make final selections for hire  Modify staffing models to adjust class size  Pay for additional work days for staff (i.e. stipends)  Waivers from traditional teacher certification requirements  Modifications to the teacher contract based on schools needs (eg. teacher workday or work year)

Finance & Resource Allocations

 Move general fund budget allocations to where resources are needed  Cluster and signature funding allocations to support priorities and needs  Transition funding flexibility (turnaround schools only)  Funding consolidation for all budgets  Changes to the budget funding model  Consolidation of general and federal funding (pilot schools

  • nly)

 Additional updates and changes to the funding models

Curriculum

 Make adjustments to school resources based on signature program and cluster plan  EIP/REP model flexibility  Gifted Delivery Model flexibility  Media specialist scheduling  Choice of student interventions  Ability to add and design courses to meet student needs (SBS)  Ability to apply for flexibility and autonomy outside of the district’s standards of service (SBS)  Choice of extended learning time model (turnaround schools

  • nly)

School Improvement and Operations

 Develop and approve innovations aligned with the school strategic improvement plan  School calendar changes to meet school needs  Can apply for flexibility and autonomy to support school

  • perational needs (i.e. space usage) (SBS)

 Managing the school day calendar and all

  • ther school
  • peration needs
slide-3
SLIDE 3

APS Signature Programs

Jackson Mays North Atlanta Therrell Douglass South Atlanta Washington BEST/CSK Carver Grady

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Four IB Clusters:

  • Jackson
  • Mays
  • North Atlanta
  • Therrell
slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6

APS FY17 IB Signature Program Budget

  • $3,641,673.00
  • Allocated for:
  • 35 current and prospective IB programs
  • At 31 schools
  • Across 4 clusters
  • $2,229,790.00 for 26.5 IB Coordinators (salary + benefits)
  • $673,144.00 for 8 World Language Teachers at Authorized IB schools
  • $645,042.00 for dues, fees, and local IB workshop registration
  • $93,697.00 for IB school staff to travel to IB workshops
slide-7
SLIDE 7

North Atlanta Cluster Plan

Mission

The NAHS Cluster will implement IB with depth and fidelity for all students in order to develop inquiring, knowledgeable and caring young people who will graduate ready for college and career.

Vision

A high performing cluster where students, educators and families work together to create a better and more peaceful world through intercultural understanding and respect.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The IB Mission Statement

(Color and boldface added for emphasis)

The International Baccalaureate Organization aims to develop inquiring, knowledgeable and caring young people who help to create a better and more peaceful world through intercultural understanding and respect. To this end the IBO works with schools, governments and international

  • rganizations to develop challenging programmes of international

education and rigorous assessment. These programmes encourage students across the world to become active, compassionate and lifelong learners who understand that other people, with their differences, can also be right.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

The IB Learner Profile

  • Inquirers
  • Knowledgeable
  • Thinkers
  • Communicators
  • Principled
  • Open-Minded
  • Caring
  • Risk-Takers
  • Balanced
  • Reflective

“The IB Mission Statement in Action”

IB Students Are:

Rigor? Whole Child? Social Emotional Learning? 21st Century Skills?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Primary Years Programme

  • Grades PK-5
  • A whole-school program
  • A curriculum framework—PYP units

drive program

  • Transdisciplinary teaching and learning
  • Inquiry-based: academic challenge

and higher-order thinking skills

  • Second language development (age 7+)
  • Focus on holistic learning, intercultural

awareness, communication

slide-11
SLIDE 11

PYP Transdisciplinary Themes Concept-Based Units, 6-8 Weeks Long Teach 4 Units in Pre-K and K 38 Units = “Programme of Inquiry” Teach 6 Units in Grades 1-5 ELA, Math, Social Studies & Science

slide-12
SLIDE 12

What Does “Transdisciplinary” Mean?

PYP MYP CP/DP

Transdisciplinary Interdisciplinary Disciplinary

  • Interdisciplinary: “Transferring the methods, models, processes,
  • r forms of logic from one learning area and applying these

within another.”

  • Transdisciplinary: “Focus on issues across learning areas,

between them and beyond them, for the emergence of new and broader perspectives and for deeper understanding of the interrelatedness of complex issues.”

—The Primary Years Programme as a model of transdisciplinary learning (2010)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

A Community of Learners

Quotes from The Primary Years Programme as a model of transdisciplinary learning (2010)

(Color and boldface added for emphasis)

“coherence of learning” (p.15) “learning in a highly integrative manner” (p.15) “relevant to the real world” (p.5) “transdisciplinarity forces a paradigm shift” (p.5) “the PYP is not business as usual” (p.5) “inclusivity” (p.15) “mixed ability grouping” (p.16) “within class flexible grouping” (p.18) “grouping and regrouping” (p.16) “differentiation through grouping” (p.16) “learning to accommodate the range of abilities and perspectives” (p.16) “one student’s learning is not at the expense of another” (p.16) “learning as a member

  • f a group”

(p.16) “learning is a social act” (p.16) “a value embedded in the principles and practices of the PYP” (p.16)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

“a value embedded in the principles and practices of the PYP”

(Color and boldface added for emphasis)

“The community that the PYP promotes is defined by the IB mission statement, the IB learner profile, the PYP curriculum model with its transdisciplinary dimensions, and the PYP implementation standards and practices.” “That community is supportive, not competitive; reflects a broad spectrum of society, not an elite cohort; is integrated, not stratified; and is committed to lifelong learning, not learning to address solely summative assessment outcomes.”

—The Primary Years Programme as a model of transdisciplinary learning (2010)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

A Transdisciplinary Community of Learners

(Color and boldface added for emphasis)

“Please note that mathematics, language of instruction, social studies and science need to be the responsibility of the classroom teacher: the teacher with whom the students spend most of their

  • time. Single-subject teaching of these areas is not consistent with

the PYP model of transdisciplinary learning—learning that transcends the confines of the subject areas, but is supported by them.” —Making the PYP happen: A curriculum framework for international primary education (2009)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

PYP Development Over Time

  • 1997

Launch of PYP focused on Transdisciplinary teaching and learning

  • 2001

1000 IB World Schools

  • 2006

PYP Committee requires core classes to be taught by the classroom teacher

  • 2006

Launch of IB Learner Profile

  • 2006

Garden Hills, Smith become authorized IB World Schools

  • 2007

2000 IB World Schools

  • 2007

Rivers, Brandon, Jackson become authorized IB World Schools

  • 2010

3000 IB World Schools

  • 2010

Bolton, Deerwood become authorized IB World Schools

  • 2011

Beecher Hills becomes authorized IB World School

  • 2012

IBO changes Programme Evaluation documents and procedures

  • 2015

4000 IB World Schools

“[I]t was decided by the PYP committee in February 2006 that mathematics, the language of instruction, social studies and science need to be the responsibility

  • f the classroom teacher—the teacher with whom the

students spend most of their time.”

—Developing a transdisciplinary programme of inquiry (2008)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

IB Programme Evaluation

  • Occurs 4 years after a PYP is initially authorized
  • Continues to occur every 5 years for the life of the programme
  • IB schools are evaluated against the IB implementation rubric called

Programme standards and practices

  • 73 IB non-negotiable standards and practices are assessed at every evaluation

visit

  • “Commendations”
  • “Recommendations”
  • “Matters to be addressed”
  • Failure to correct matters to be addressed may result in the loss of IB

authorization

  • Four APS PYP Programme Evaluation visits since 2015: Sarah Smith, Warren T.

Jackson, Morris Brandon, E. Rivers

slide-18
SLIDE 18

PYP Programme Evaluation Since 2015

Matter to be Addressed # APS Schools Receiving Matters to be Addressed

Pullout Gifted (Resource Model)

4 out of 4

Pullout Accelerated Math (Resource Model)

4 out of 4

slide-19
SLIDE 19

IB Programme Evaluation

  • IB schools receiving matters to be addressed are required to submit a response detailing

plans to correct discrepancies and to upload requested documentation

  • Schools usually have up to one year to respond to IB Americas:
  • Sarah Smith submitted their response on 12/1/2015
  • W. T. Jackson’s submitted their response on 6/1/2016
  • Morris Brandon’s response is due on 12/1/2016
  • E. Rivers’ response is due on 12/1/2016
  • After receiving school responses IB Americas takes one of two actions:
  • Accepts the response and checks for implementation at the next Programme Evaluation visit (usually in 4 years)
  • Deems the response to be inadequate and schedules another school visit to check progress (usually within 6

months)

  • Several matters to be addressed require a district-level response to be submitted along

with school-level plans

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Apply for Candidacy Consultant Visit Apply for Authorization Verification Visit Program Evaluation Visit

North Atlanta Cluster IB Program Phasing

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Accelerated Math

slide-22
SLIDE 22

IB Evaluation Results (Accelerated Math)

School IB Finding Matter to be Addressed Evidence to be Submitted to IB APS PYP School #1 “To accommodate students’ different learning needs they have developed a pull out system for mathematics […]. For many students this instruction is provided by a different teacher.” “All classroom teachers […] take responsibility at least for the language of instruction, mathematics, social studies, and science, to support the PYP model of transdisciplinary teaching and learning.” “Statement from the school indicating how it will modify its practices to be in alignment with IB policy.” “Teacher timetables showing fulfillment of the requirement.” APS PYP School #2 “Students in grades 4 and 5 are divided according to math ability levels and travel to different teachers for math instruction.” “All classroom teachers […] take responsibility at least for the language of instruction, mathematics, social studies, and science, to support the PYP model of transdisciplinary teaching and learning.” Note: This is the exact same language as APS PYP School #1 “Teacher job descriptions […] for mainstream classroom teachers, the description should include specifically the teaching of the language of instruction, mathematics, social studies and science.”

slide-23
SLIDE 23

IB Evaluation Results (Accelerated Math)

School IB Finding Matter to be Addressed Evidence to be Submitted to IB APS PYP School #3 “The school is ability grouping for math instruction for grades 2-5. Students are grouped across the grade and may rotate to a different teacher for this subject area.” The school “demonstrates commitment to transdisciplinary learning.” “The school must provide an action plan that shows how it will restructure math instruction so that it can be incorporated in a transdisciplinary manner.” APS PYP School #4 “From grade 3 to grade 5, classes are departmentalized.” Note: This finding is very

  • broad. Accelerated Math

pullouts are an example of this prohibited practice. “All classroom teachers […] take responsibility at least for the language of instruction, mathematics, social studies, and science, to support the PYP model of transdisciplinary teaching and learning.” Note: This is the exact same language as APS PYP Schools #1 and 2. “A statement from the school indicating that the practice of departmentalized instruction will cease.”

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Excerpts

  • “Students who are capable of

moving more quickly deserve thoughtful attention, both to ensure that they are challenged and that they are mastering the full range of mathematical content and skills” (p.81).

  • “Care must be taken to ensure

that […] the continuity of the mathematics learning progression is not disrupted” (p.81).

slide-25
SLIDE 25

More Excerpts

  • “Decisions to accelerate students into […] high school mathematics

before ninth grade should not be rushed. Placing students into tracks too early should be avoided at all costs. It is not recommended to compact the standards before grade seven” (p.82).

  • “Decisions to accelerate students into high school mathematics

before ninth grade should be based on solid evidence of student

  • learning. Research has shown discrepancies in the placement of

students into ‘advanced’ classes by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic background” (p.82).

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Multiple Access Points Start Accel Math in GR9, reach AP Calculus AB by GR12 Very different paths to the same destination Only one path leads to AP Calculus BC Zero NAHS students are enrolled in AP Calc BC 20 NAHS students enrolled in AP Calc AB

slide-27
SLIDE 27

IB Diploma Programme (IBDP) Math Options

  • IBDP courses may only be taken in 11th and 12th grades
  • All IBDP students are required to take IBDP Math
  • North Atlanta High School offers two IB math courses:
  • IB Math Studies—one year long, usually taken by seniors
  • IB Mathematics—two years long, taken in junior and senior years
  • Strong IBDP math students may take AP Calculus and/or AP

Statistics in addition to IBDP math

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Very different paths to the same destination IBDP Math courses may be taken in GR11 and GR12 Regular path Math students reach IB Math Studies by GR12 Start Accel Math in GR9, reach IB Math YR 2 by GR12 AP Calc/Stats may be taken concurrently with IB Math

slide-29
SLIDE 29

2015-2016 North Atlanta Cluster Accelerated Math Enrollments

North Atlanta Bolton Academy Elementary School 25 26 51 581 8.8% North Atlanta

  • E. Rivers Elementary School

55 43 98 775 12.6% North Atlanta Garden Hills Elementary School 18 14 32 484 6.6% North Atlanta Morris Brandon Elementary School 67 77 144 1059 13.6% North Atlanta Sarah Rawson Smith Elementary School 53 62 115 1094 10.5% North Atlanta Warren T. Jackson Elementary School 31 30 61 826 7.4% 501 4819 10.4% 4 5 Grand Total Accel Math Total Enrollment % Enrolled in Accel Math Cluster School Accelerated Math Students Totals by Grade Level 1 2 3

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Gifted and Talented

slide-31
SLIDE 31

IB Evaluation Results (Gifted)

School IB Finding Matter to be Addressed Evidence to be Submitted to IB APS PYP School #1 “To meet their GATE requirements, identified students are withdrawn

  • ne day per week for an

independent enriched programme.” “All classroom teachers […] take responsibility at least for the language of instruction, mathematics, social studies, and science, to support the PYP model of transdisciplinary teaching and learning.” “Statement from the school indicating how it will modify its practices to be in alignment with IB policy.” “Teacher timetables showing fulfillment of the requirement.” APS PYP School #2 “The school has a one full day per week pull out program for gifted and talented students. Gifted and talented teachers follow a prescriptive curriculum provided by the district.” “The PYP is implemented in an inclusive manner, so that all students in the grade/year levels in the school […] are engaged with the PYP to the maximum extent possible.” “Statement of the school governing body and leadership that includes actions taken to integrate the gifted and talented students into the PYP as it is delivered in the regular classroom.”

slide-32
SLIDE 32

IB Evaluation Results (Gifted)

School IB Finding Matter to be Addressed Evidence to be Submitted to IB APS PYP School #3 “Gifted students are pulled from their homeroom class for a significant amount of time each week. […] Gifted and talented instructors feel compelled to abide by district requirements which differs [sic] from essential elements

  • f the PYP.”

“The PYP is implemented in an inclusive manner, so that all students in the grade/year levels in the school […] are engaged with the PYP to the maximum extent possible.” Note: This is the exact same language as APS PYP School #2 “Statement from the school governing body and leadership that includes actions taken to teach PYP in an inclusive manner so that all students […] are engaged with PYP to the fullest extent possible.” APS PYP School #4 “Single-subject teachers and teachers of the gifted and talented are not using the [curriculum] framework.” The school “demonstrates its commitment to the Primary Years Programme as the framework for all planning, teaching and learning across the curriculum, in particular, by using the planner and the programme of inquiry.” “An outline of how the programme for students identified as gifted/talented is implemented at the school.”

slide-33
SLIDE 33

GaDOE Approved Gifted Delivery Models

  • Resource Class:
  • Teacher is gifted endorsed
  • Students are pulled for whole day interdisciplinary instruction
  • Curriculum is focused on interdisciplinary enrichment activities
  • Advanced Content:
  • Teacher of record is gifted endorsed
  • Students are homogenously grouped by achievement
  • Cluster Grouping:
  • Regular classroom teacher is gifted endorsed
  • Gifted instruction and services are delivered through the general content (differentiation)
  • Up to 49% of the class may be identified as Gifted
  • Collaborative Services:
  • Classroom teacher is not gifted endorsed
  • Gifted content is delivered through the general content (differentiation) in collaboration with a

Gifted-endorsed teacher

  • No more than 8 students per homeroom may be identified as Gifted
slide-34
SLIDE 34

2015-2016 North Atlanta Cluster Gifted Enrollments

North Atlanta Bolton Academy Elementary School 5 7 17 13 14 56 581 9.6% North Atlanta

  • E. Rivers Elementary School

9 23 15 22 35 104 775 13.4% North Atlanta Garden Hills Elementary School 1 10 10 15 36 484 7.4% North Atlanta Morris Brandon Elementary School 19 76 75 87 89 346 1059 32.7% North Atlanta Sarah Rawson Smith Elementary School 13 30 52 49 66 210 1094 19.2% North Atlanta Warren T. Jackson Elementary School 13 27 48 59 55 202 826 24.5% 1177 4819 24.4% Total Enrollment % Gifted Identified Totals Grand Total Gifted Cluster 4 5 School Gifted Identified Students by Grade Level 1 2 3

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Where Are We Going?

  • Shift from Resource to the Cluster Gifted delivery model

(phased approach)

  • Some classroom teachers will need to become Gifted endorsed

at each grade level

  • APS will offer a free Gifted endorsement class each year
  • Teachers receive provisional certification when they enter a

cohort

  • APS will continue to fund Gifted teachers based on a specific

formula

  • Some will serve as classroom teachers
  • One will be assigned as the Gifted Lead Teacher
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Gifted Lead Teacher

  • Coordinates Gifted instruction school-wide
  • Ensures quality and continuity of Gifted and Talented services
  • Meets weekly with each PYP grade-level team
  • Designs Gifted differentiated content as part of IB units
  • Team teaches some Gifted content with classroom teachers
  • Facilitates Gifted student participation in district and state

competitions and exposure opportunities

  • Manages Gifted testing and identification processes
  • Coordinates scheduling of Gifted students
  • Serves as the APS Gifted Office point of contact
slide-37
SLIDE 37

What are the benefits of this change?

  • Gifted Students continue to be served in compliance with

Federal law and GaDOE policy

  • Students will be served by 2 Gifted teachers, their classroom

teacher and the Gifted Lead Teacher

  • Gifted instruction is embedded daily, all day long, in all core

subjects

  • Gifted instruction becomes a part of daily life in an IB classroom
  • Schools earn up to 50% more Gifted funding, potentially

lowering class sizes

  • PYP Transdisciplinary teaching and learning requirements are

met

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Sample Gifted FTE Calculation

  • Resource (pullout) model example
  • Largest class (89 students) is scheduled to receive Gifted services on the FTE count day
  • Resource model counts 5 FTE segments per student: 89 x 5 = 445 segments earned
  • Smaller enrolled grades receive Gifted services on other days of the week and do not count

for FTE purposes

  • Cluster model example
  • All students (346) are scheduled to receive Gifted services on the FTE count day
  • Cluster model counts 2 FTE segments per student: 346 x 2 = 692 segments earned
  • The cluster model earns this school 54.8% more FTE over the resource model and can lead to

increased Gifted teacher allocations

North Atlanta APS PYP School 19 76 75 87 89 346 1059 32.7% Total Enrollment % Gifted Identified Totals Grand Total Gifted Cluster 4 5 School Gifted Identified Students by Grade Level 1 2 3

slide-39
SLIDE 39
slide-40
SLIDE 40

Backup Slides

slide-41
SLIDE 41

APS 2014-2015 CCRPI Scores

62.8 77.8 22.5 32.3 33.0 36.3 5.8 6.8

Non-IB Schools (n=90) IB Schools (n=13) CCRPI Points Earned Average CCRPI Score Average Achievement Points Average Progress Points Average Achievement Gap Points Georgia Avg. CCRPI = 75.5

slide-42
SLIDE 42

APS CCRPI Scores 2012-2015

50 55 60 65 70 75 80 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015

APS Average CCRPI Over Time

Non-IB Schools IB Schools

slide-43
SLIDE 43

APS CCRPI Scores 2012-2015

50 55 60 65 70 75 80 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015

APS CCRPI Compared to Georgia

APS Non-IB Schools APS IB Schools Georgia

slide-44
SLIDE 44

APS AP and IB Over Time

AP IBDP

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

AP Students AP Exams (9th-12th) 3+ Scores

200 400 600 800 1000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

IBDP Students IBDP Exams (12th) 4+ Scores

slide-45
SLIDE 45

APS AP and IBDP Exam Scores

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 AP 3+ Percentage (5 Point Scale) IBDP 4+ Percentage (7 Point Scale)

slide-46
SLIDE 46

IB IB

Student-centered Inquiry-based learning Project-based learning Concept-based units Community service Social & emotional learning Real world content Rigorous coursework Business & community engagement Career awareness & exposure Strong Science & Math offerings Strong Arts offerings Career, technology, & life skills Interdisciplinary teaching Student reflection Character education 21st century skills Teacher training IB authorization process IB program evaluation process Core disciplines focus Multilingualism IB Learner Profile International Mindedness Approaches to Learning Action Global contexts STEM certification process STEM Frameworks Science & Math focus Teacher certification Student internships Technology integration STEM-related competitions

STEAM