PW Parkway Elementary School Boundary Planning Committee - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
pw parkway elementary school boundary planning committee
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

PW Parkway Elementary School Boundary Planning Committee - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nov 05, 2022 723 likes •1.08k views

PW Parkway Elementary School Boundary Planning Committee Recommendations Prince William County School Board Meeting January 2, 2019 Denise Huebner, Associate Superintendent for Eastern Elementary Schools Dr. Matthew R. Cartlidge, Supervisor

slide-1
SLIDE 1

PW Parkway Elementary School Boundary Planning Committee Recommendations

Prince William County School Board Meeting

January 2, 2019

Denise Huebner, Associate Superintendent for Eastern Elementary Schools

  • Dr. Matthew R. Cartlidge, Supervisor of Planning,

Office of Facilities Services

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Presentation Outline

  • A. Current School Capacity & Boundaries
  • B. Capital Improvements Scheduled
  • C. Boundary Planning Process
  • D. Proposed Boundary Plans

a. Plan 2a b. Plan 3 c. Plan 3a

1/2/2019 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Current School Boundaries & Capacities (2018-19)

1/2/2019 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

1/2/2019 4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Elementary Enrollment Projections

(Current Boundaries)

1/2/2019 5

2019 Program Capacity

Portable Classrooms

Total Students

  • Pct. of

Capacity Total Students

  • Pct. of

Capacity Total Students

  • Pct. Of

Capacity Total Students

  • Pct. of

Capacity Total Students

  • Pct. Of

Capacity

  • Pct. LEP
  • Pct. Econ.

Disadvantaged Pct. Minority

Antietam ES

914 1 632 69.2% 644 70.5% 646 70.6% 647 70.8% 656 71.7% 13.8% 31.7% 62.4%

Belmont ES

547 454 83.0% 475 86.8% 491 89.7% 508 92.8% 514 94.0% 42.9% 73.1% 87.5%

Feathers tone ES

418 3 493 118.0% 508 121.5% 510 122.0% 511 122.3% 518 123.9% 55.3% 81.1% 93.8%

Kerrydale ES

355 6 448 126.2% 427 120.3% 428 120.7% 431 121.5% 437 123.1% 44.5% 72.7% 90.0%

Kilby ES

684 768 112.3% 742 108.5% 744 108.8% 772 112.9% 793 115.9% 51.5% 75.2% 91.6%

Lake Ridge ES

862 5 579 67.2% 578 67.0% 578 67.1% 583 67.6% 590 68.5% 18.2% 38.6% 67.6%

Marums co Hills ES

580 5 661 114.0% 658 113.4% 666 114.8% 730 125.8% 754 130.0% 52.4% 78.8% 93.6%

Minnieville ES

623 1 550 88.3% 518 83.1% 520 83.4% 527 84.6% 534 85.6% 41.8% 70.4% 92.3%

Occoquan ES

498 7 649 130.4% 645 129.6% 649 130.3% 669 134.3% 679 136.3% 37.5% 60.8% 83.3%

Old Bridge ES

532 1 745 140.1% 730 137.2% 732 137.6% 743 139.7% 753 141.6% 24.0% 34.6% 62.4%

Penn ES

661 5 874 132.2% 881 133.3% 901 136.3% 925 140.0% 942 142.5% 19.1% 34.3% 74.3%

Potomac View ES

529 10 633 119.6% 658 124.4% 667 126.0% 689 130.3% 698 132.0% 52.9% 81.2% 92.2%

Rockledge ES

522 5 622 119.2% 647 124.0% 653 125.2% 690 132.1% 707 135.5% 24.3% 45.4% 71.4%

Springwoods ES

920 7 653 71.0% 650 70.6% 651 70.8% 654 71.1% 662 72.0% 15.6% 28.0% 62.1%

Vaughan ES

586 3 594 101.3% 583 99.5% 584 99.6% 586 100.0% 594 101.3% 45.6% 75.9% 90.3%

Wes tridge ES

709 2 685 96.6% 710 100.1% 712 100.4% 714 100.7% 723 102.0% 10.4% 21.5% 58.8%

Total

9,940 61 10,042 101.0% 10,054 101.1% 10,132 101.9% 10,380 104.4% 10,553 106.2% 33.4% 54.9% 78.8%

Notes: Capacity includes classroom additions opening in 2019-20.

School Name Facility Data 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2023-24 2025-26 Demographics

slide-6
SLIDE 6

School Capacity Utilization Prior to Additions and Boundary Adjustment

1/2/2019 6

65% 85% 105% 125% 145% 165%

Utilization of Affected Schools without Additions

2019-20 Utilization 2023-24 Utilization

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Past & Current Capital Improvements Eastern Prince William County

Past Current

1/2/2019 7

Year School Cost Additional Seats Year School Cost Additional Seats 2016 Wilson ES 28,534,000 $ 997 Antietam ES Addition 10,384,000 $ 345 Kilby ES Replacement 31,476,000 $ 313 Lake Ridge ES Addition 10,884,000 $ 327 Covington-Harper ES 29,374,000 $ 750 Springwoods ES Addition 11,884,000 $ 327 Belmont ES Addition 8,667,000 $ 187 Minnieville ES Addition 12,043,000 $ 176 Henderson Addition 9,318,000 $ 253 Leesylvania ES Addition 6,900,000 $ 108 Neabsco ES Addition 7,904,000 $ 149 PW Parkway ES 32,685,000 $ 749 115,273,000 $ 2,649 84,780,000 $ 2,032 2017 Total 2019 Total

slide-8
SLIDE 8

1/2/2019 8

2019 Capital Improvements

Eastern Prince William County

slide-9
SLIDE 9

1/2/2019 9

“PW Parkway” Elementary

slide-10
SLIDE 10

School Capacity Utilization After Additions and No Boundary Adjustment

1/2/2019 10

65% 85% 105% 125% 145% 165%

Utilization of Affected Schools with Additions

2019-20 Utilization 2023-24 Utilization

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Boundary Planning Process

Governed by:

  • School Board Policy 264
  • Regulation 264-2

1/2/2019 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

School Board Policy 264

  • Provides for the creation of the Boundary Planning Committee to:
  • Obtain public input in the boundary planning process
  • Develop elementary school boundary plan proposals
  • Receive public input during the Community Meetings to make modifications to its

boundary plans (as necessary)

  • Prepare a Final Report that includes recommendations for the School Board’s

consideration

  • “School boundaries for each school are established by the School Board based on

the need to provide for instructional effectiveness and the health, safety, and general welfare of all students.”

1/2/2019 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Regulation 264-2

  • Each boundary plan will attempt to:
  • Balance enrollments at the affected schools within ±15% of the total capacity utilization over

the next 3 years

  • Minimize the number of times a specific geographic area is reassigned schools within the past

several years at a specific school level (e.g., elementary, middle, & high)

  • Facilitate the efficient transport of students
  • Avoid splitting small neighborhoods
  • Improve geographic progression of communities
  • Consider the demographic balance

1/2/2019 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Demographic Balance

  • Boundary Planning Committee considers three demographic variables
  • LEP (Limited English Proficiency)
  • Economically Disadvantaged
  • Minority
  • Awareness of these data provides for the drawing of boundaries that

embraces diversity among schools in the Division

1/2/2019 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Boundary Committee Responsibilities

  • Review the initial plan developed by the Office of Facilities Services
  • Analyze student enrollment, school capacity, housing, and demographic data
  • Collaborate and develop new boundary plans
  • Hold two Community Meetings with intent to gain “input” from community

members

  • Modify boundary proposals (as necessary)
  • Prepare a Final Report to the School Board with boundary recommendation(s) for

consideration

1/2/2019 15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Plan 2a Proposed Boundaries

1/2/2019 16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

1/2/2019 17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Plan 2a

Capacity Utilization

1/2/2019 18

2019 Program Capacity

Portable Classrooms

Total Students

  • Pct. of

Capacity Total Students

  • Pct. of

Capacity Total Students

  • Pct. of

Capacity Total Students

  • Pct. of

Capacity Total Students

  • Pct. Of

Capacity

  • Pct. LEP
  • Pct. Econ.

Disadvantaged Pct. Minority

PW Parkway ES

749 665 88.8% 638 85.2% 644 86.0% 665 88.8% 680 90.8% 41.2% 65.1% 82.6%

Antietam ES

914 774 84.7% 804 88.0% 806 88.1% 830 90.8% 843 92.3% 17.6% 34.4% 66.4%

Belmont ES

547 540 98.8% 553 101.0% 568 103.8% 585 106.9% 592 108.2% 42.4% 71.0% 87.5%

Feathers tone ES

418 430 102.8% 445 106.3% 446 106.8% 448 107.1% 453 108.4% 54.7% 80.3% 93.8%

Kerrydale ES

355 350 98.6% 336 94.6% 337 94.8% 339 95.5% 343 96.8% 42.7% 71.5% 88.5%

Kilby ES

684 630 92.1% 610 89.2% 613 89.6% 641 93.7% 659 96.4% 51.9% 76.2% 92.0%

Lake Ridge ES

862 697 80.8% 704 81.7% 705 81.8% 710 82.4% 719 83.4% 16.9% 37.6% 66.3%

Marums co Hills ES

580 578 99.7% 578 99.6% 586 101.0% 649 111.9% 673 115.9% 50.9% 77.5% 93.7%

Minnieville ES

623 635 102.0% 599 96.1% 601 96.5% 609 97.7% 616 98.9% 43.4% 71.5% 93.5%

Occoquan ES

498 528 106.1% 525 105.4% 528 106.1% 542 108.9% 550 110.5% 41.9% 65.8% 87.1%

Old Bridge ES

532 461 86.7% 467 87.7% 468 87.9% 472 88.7% 478 89.8% 14.4% 23.1% 54.1%

Penn ES

661 656 99.2% 643 97.2% 650 98.4% 665 100.7% 678 102.6% 20.6% 41.6% 77.4%

Potomac View ES

529 497 94.0% 518 97.9% 526 99.4% 547 103.5% 554 104.8% 56.0% 83.9% 91.1%

Rockledge ES

522 482 92.3% 475 91.0% 475 91.1% 483 92.5% 489 93.7% 23.3% 47.0% 69.2%

Springwoods ES

920 889 96.6% 901 97.9% 903 98.1% 906 98.4% 917 99.7% 16.2% 29.4% 66.1%

Vaughan ES

586 570 97.3% 571 97.4% 572 97.6% 576 98.2% 583 99.5% 52.0% 79.7% 94.5%

Wes tridge ES

709 659 93.0% 690 97.4% 704 99.3% 715 100.8% 724 102.1% 9.1% 14.4% 54.0%

Affected Schools Total

10,689 10,042 93.9% 10,054 94.1% 10,132 94.8% 10,380 97.1% 10,553 98.7% 33.4% 54.9% 78.8%

Notes: *Totals may not reflect sum of integers because of use of fractions in forecasted student enrollment.

School Name Facility Data 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2023-24 2025-26 Demographics

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Plan 3 Proposed Boundaries

1/2/2019 19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

1/2/2019 20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Plan 3

Capacity Utilization

1/2/2019 21

2019 Program Capacity

Portable Classrooms

Total Students

  • Pct. of

Capacity Total Students

  • Pct. of

Capacity Total Students

  • Pct. of

Capacity Total Students

  • Pct. of

Capacity Total Students

  • Pct. Of

Capacity

  • Pct. LEP
  • Pct. Econ.

Disadvantaged Pct. Minority

PW Parkway ES

749 690 92.2% 668 89.2% 675 90.1% 696 92.9% 712 95.0% 40.6% 65.3% 83.7%

Antietam ES

914 807 88.3% 843 92.2% 844 92.4% 869 95.0% 883 96.6% 17.3% 34.4% 65.9%

Belmont ES

547 540 98.8% 553 101.0% 568 103.8% 585 106.9% 592 108.2% 42.4% 71.0% 87.5%

Feathers tone ES

418 430 102.8% 445 106.3% 446 106.8% 448 107.1% 453 108.4% 54.7% 80.3% 93.8%

Kerrydale ES

355 350 98.6% 336 94.6% 337 94.8% 339 95.5% 343 96.8% 42.7% 71.5% 88.5%

Kilby ES

684 630 92.1% 610 89.2% 613 89.6% 641 93.7% 659 96.4% 51.9% 76.2% 92.0%

Lake Ridge ES

862 703 81.6% 705 81.8% 706 81.9% 711 82.5% 720 83.6% 16.8% 36.3% 65.9%

Marums co Hills ES

580 578 99.7% 578 99.6% 586 101.0% 649 111.9% 673 115.9% 50.9% 77.5% 93.7%

Minnieville ES

623 550 88.3% 518 83.1% 520 83.4% 527 84.6% 534 85.6% 41.8% 70.4% 92.3%

Occoquan ES

498 528 106.1% 525 105.4% 528 106.1% 542 108.9% 550 110.5% 41.9% 65.8% 87.1%

Old Bridge ES

532 481 90.5% 478 89.8% 479 90.0% 482 90.7% 489 91.8% 20.9% 31.2% 59.8%

Penn ES

661 634 95.9% 650 98.3% 670 101.4% 692 104.7% 705 106.6% 14.4% 27.5% 71.0%

Potomac View ES

529 497 94.0% 518 97.9% 526 99.4% 547 103.5% 554 104.8% 56.0% 83.9% 91.1%

Rockledge ES

522 482 92.3% 475 91.0% 475 91.1% 483 92.5% 489 93.7% 23.3% 47.0% 69.2%

Springwoods ES

920 889 96.6% 901 97.9% 903 98.1% 906 98.4% 917 99.7% 16.2% 29.4% 66.1%

Vaughan ES

586 570 97.3% 571 97.4% 572 97.6% 576 98.2% 583 99.5% 52.0% 79.7% 94.5%

Wes tridge ES

709 681 96.0% 683 96.3% 685 96.5% 688 97.0% 697 98.3% 15.3% 28.5% 60.5%

Affected Schools Total

10,689 10,042 93.9% 10,054 94.1% 10,132 94.8% 10,380 97.1% 10,553 98.7% 33.4% 54.9% 78.8%

Notes: *Totals may not reflect sum of integers because of use of fractions in forecasted student enrollment.

School Name Facility Data 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2023-24 2025-26 Demographics

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Plan 3a Proposed Boundaries

1/2/2019 22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

1/2/2019 23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Plan 3a

Capacity Utilization

1/2/2019 24

2019 Program Capacity

Portable Classrooms

Total Students

  • Pct. of

Capacity Total Students

  • Pct. of

Capacity Total Students

  • Pct. of

Capacity Total Students

  • Pct. of

Capacity Total Students

  • Pct. Of

Capacity

  • Pct. LEP
  • Pct. Econ.

Disadvantaged Pct. Minority

PW Parkway ES

749 690 92.2% 668 89.2% 675 90.1% 696 92.9% 712 95.0% 40.6% 65.3% 83.7%

Antietam ES

914 807 88.3% 843 92.2% 844 92.4% 869 95.0% 883 96.6% 17.3% 34.4% 65.9%

Belmont ES

547 540 98.8% 553 101.0% 568 103.8% 585 106.9% 592 108.2% 42.4% 71.0% 87.5%

Feathers tone ES

418 430 102.8% 445 106.3% 446 106.8% 448 107.1% 453 108.4% 54.7% 80.3% 93.8%

Kerrydale ES

355 350 98.6% 336 94.6% 337 94.8% 339 95.5% 343 96.8% 42.7% 71.5% 88.5%

Kilby ES

684 630 92.1% 610 89.2% 613 89.6% 641 93.7% 659 96.4% 51.9% 76.2% 92.0%

Lake Ridge ES

862 723 83.9% 725 84.1% 726 84.2% 731 84.8% 740 85.9% 16.5% 35.6% 65.0%

Marums co Hills ES

580 578 99.7% 578 99.6% 586 101.0% 649 111.9% 673 115.9% 50.9% 77.5% 93.7%

Minnieville ES

623 550 88.3% 518 83.1% 520 83.4% 527 84.6% 534 85.6% 41.8% 70.4% 92.3%

Occoquan ES

498 528 106.1% 525 105.4% 528 106.1% 542 108.9% 550 110.5% 41.9% 65.8% 87.1%

Old Bridge ES

532 481 90.5% 478 89.8% 479 90.0% 482 90.7% 489 91.8% 20.9% 31.2% 59.8%

Penn ES

661 656 99.2% 643 97.2% 650 98.4% 665 100.7% 678 102.6% 20.6% 41.6% 77.4%

Potomac View ES

529 497 94.0% 518 97.9% 526 99.4% 547 103.5% 554 104.8% 56.0% 83.9% 91.1%

Rockledge ES

522 482 92.3% 475 91.0% 475 91.1% 483 92.5% 489 93.7% 23.3% 47.0% 69.2%

Springwoods ES

920 869 94.4% 881 95.7% 883 96.0% 886 96.3% 897 97.5% 16.5% 29.8% 66.9%

Vaughan ES

586 570 97.3% 571 97.4% 572 97.6% 576 98.2% 583 99.5% 52.0% 79.7% 94.5%

Wes tridge ES

709 659 93.0% 690 97.4% 704 99.3% 715 100.8% 724 102.1% 9.1% 14.4% 54.0%

Affected Schools Total

10,689 10,042 93.9% 10,054 94.1% 10,132 94.8% 10,380 97.1% 10,553 98.7% 33.4% 54.9% 78.8%

Notes: *Totals may not reflect sum of integers because of use of fractions in forecasted student enrollment.

School Name Facility Data 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2023-24 2025-26 Demographics

slide-25
SLIDE 25

2021-22 Utilization Comparison

1/2/2019 25

75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100% 105% 110% 115% Plan 2a Plan 3 Plan 3a

94.8% Total Utilization

slide-26
SLIDE 26

2021-22 Utilization Difference Between Plan 2a and 3

1/2/2019 26

75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100% 105% 110% 115% "PW Parkway" ES Antietam ES Lake Ridge ES Minnieville ES Old Bridge ES Penn ES Westridge ES Plan 2a Plan 3

94.8% Total Utilization

slide-27
SLIDE 27

2021-22 Utilization Difference Between Plan 2a and 3a

1/2/2019 27

75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100% 105% 110% 115% "PW Parkway" ES Antietam ES Lake Ridge ES Minnieville ES Old Bridge ES Springwoods ES Plan 2a Plan 3a

94.8% Total Utilization

slide-28
SLIDE 28

2021-22 Utilization Difference Between Plan 3 and 3a

1/2/2019 28

75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100% 105% 110% 115% Lake Ridge ES Penn ES Springwoods ES Westridge ES Plan 3 Plan 3a

94.8% Total Utilization

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Demographic Changes

1/2/2019 29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Limited English Proficiency

Comparison Among Plans

1/2/2019 30

95.5% Total Utilization

5% 15% 25% 35% 45% 55% Current LEP Plan 2a LEP Plan 3 LEP Plan 3a LEP

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Economically Disadvantaged

Comparison Among Plans

1/2/2019 31

10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Current Econ. Dis. Plan 2a Econ. Dis. Plan 3 Econ. Dis. Plan 3a Econ. Dis.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Minority

Comparison Among Plans

1/2/2019 32

95.5% Total Utilization

40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Current Min. Plan 2a Min. Plan 3 Min. Plan 3a Min.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Boundary Committee Recommendations

  • Approving one of the presented boundary plan proposals.
  • Plan 2a (Supporting = 10; Not Supporting = 0; Abstention = 0)
  • Plan 3 (Supporting = 10; Not Supporting = 0; Abstention = 0)
  • Plan 3a (Supporting = 9; Not Supporting = 1; Abstention = 0)
  • Preference (Plan 3 = 5; Plan 2a = 4; Abstention = 1)
  • Permitting rising 5th graders at the affected schools to remain at their presently

assigned school for the 2019-20 school year with the caveat that they provide their

  • wn transportation.

1/2/2019 33

That the School Board receives the Boundary Committee’s report and consider:

slide-34
SLIDE 34

PW Parkway Elementary School Boundary Planning Committee Recommendations

Prince William County School Board Meeting

January 2, 2019

  • Mr. Denise Huebner, Associate Superintendent

for Eastern Elementary Schools

  • Dr. Matthew R. Cartlidge, Supervisor of Planning,

Office of Facilities Services