Proposed construction of five mini cellular sites in Ludwigsdorf
Public Meeting: Wednesday, 19 September 2012 , 18h00 Eastside Baptist Church c/o Hebenstreit and Dr Kwame Nkrumah
Public Meeting: Wednesday, 19 September 2012 , 18h00 Eastside - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Proposed construction of five mini cellular sites in Ludwigsdorf Public Meeting: Wednesday, 19 September 2012 , 18h00 Eastside Baptist Church c/o Hebenstreit and Dr Kwame Nkrumah Agenda Introduction and welcoming The EIA Process
Public Meeting: Wednesday, 19 September 2012 , 18h00 Eastside Baptist Church c/o Hebenstreit and Dr Kwame Nkrumah
Introduction and welcoming The EIA Process Description of the proposed project (MTC) Issues Identification Electromagnetic Radiation specialist findings (EMSS) Discussion Concluding Remarks
Name Organization Role
Harold Cloete MTC GM Network Hannes Van der Merwe MTC Manager Radio Hans Schmidt-Dumont MTC Project Coordinator Norman Van Zyl Enviro Dynamics Senior Environmental Assessment Practitioner (EAP) Eloise Carstens Enviro Dynamics Environmental Assessment Practitioner (EAP) Gerhard Mohrman SATCOM Radiation Assessment Study Frans Meyer EMSS Group Radiation Assessment Study
MTC wishes to construct five new mini-towers in the
Environmental Management Act, 2007 (7 of 2007)
The Regulations now promulgated - use as framework
for this project
Listed activity – EIA process needs to be followed
Enviro Dynamics appointed to assess the potential
What exactly is an EIA?
Legal process Independent person appointed Give best available estimate of the possible impacts and
effects that could result from the proposed project
Give consideration to the social and ecological
environment – information from public
We don’t make the decisions – we provide information
to the decision makers to make the decisions
So where are we in the EIA process?
Obtaining and sharing of information
Report writing Submission of report to Directorate of Environmental Affairs for clearance
Public Input Specialist Input Public Input Local Authorities Input
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3
Share information
on the project it’s radiation contribution potential
Allow public understanding and input
Forum for the public concerns to be defined and noted Forum to assess the need and desirability
Boundaries
Not a forum for debate Not a forum for justification
Potential issues we’ve identified so far in Phase 1:
Potential health and safety impact – particularly with
regard to radiation
Potential increased incidences of lightning strikes Potential nuisances during construction ………..?
Purpose of public participation process is to determine
Public input very important during the EIA process
Ensures that public is informed of the proposed project and
provides you with an opportunity to comment and raise your concerns
Next steps
Public Comments Period closes on the 26th of September 2012 THEN: we’ll analyze information gathered, assess the
potential impacts
the project and make
recommendations
Draft report will be circulated again for public review (for 2
weeks) before submitting it to the DEA.
Contact: Eloise Carstens Tel: 061-223 336 Fax: 061-307 437 Email: eloise@envirod.com