The Museum Outside In Silvia Filippini Fantoni, Indianapolis Museum - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the museum outside in
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Museum Outside In Silvia Filippini Fantoni, Indianapolis Museum - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Museum Outside In Silvia Filippini Fantoni, Indianapolis Museum of Art The Collection User-centred Approach Visitor-Centered Approach Visitor-Centricity at the IMA Implementation of a new exhibition development model


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Museum “Outside In”

Silvia Filippini Fantoni, Indianapolis Museum of Art

slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3

The Collection

slide-4
SLIDE 4

User-centred Approach

Visitor-Centered Approach

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Implementation of a

new exhibition development model

  • Creation of an

audience research and evaluation team

  • Development of

participatory projects

Visitor-Centricity at the IMA

slide-6
SLIDE 6

New Exhibition Development Process

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Principles

  • Make the exhibition development process more

collaborative from the start by including representatives from various departments, who contribute different perspectives.

  • Include representatives of Evaluation and Interpretation

who are charged with prioritizing the needs and interests of visitors and who ensure that learning theories are applied to the process.

  • Identify early in the process the exhibition’s main thesis

(big idea) and learning outcomes and use these as a reference to develop interpretive material, gallery design and layout, criteria to evaluate success.

  • Incorporate testing and evaluation at the various steps of

the exhibition development process, to guarantee that visitor feedback is taken into account.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Objectives

  • Make exhibitions more accessible to visitors,

particularly those that have little or no previous knowledge of art or art history.

  • Increase visitors’ engagement with artworks and

the institution, as well as their understanding of art.

  • Increase visitors’ satisfaction with their

experiences.

  • Attract new audiences and increase repeat

visitation.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Exhibition Proposal Process

Preliminary Proposal*. Curatorial meeting discussion. Proposal is presented by curator. Exhibition Committee vet and approve.** Front-end evaluation: Test visitors’ interest in topic/concept (if appropriate) Approval by Exhibition Committee and scheduling.

Staff from various depts. Senior management or exhibition committee Core team Curatorial staff

Core team is established

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Big idea Document ** Exhibition Committee vet and approve Exhibition Layout Formative evaluation with visitors* Evaluation Plan Graphic Design (cont.) Content develop- ment

Interpretation Plan***

Checklist finalized

Exhibition Development Process

Department staff Core team Senior management or exhibition committee

Activity develop- ment

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • The landscapes and rich

cultural traditions of the Southwest fueled the imaginations of early 20th century artists like Georgia O’Keeffe. The evocative still life paintings produced by these artists provide a fascinating example of art’s capacity to document the essence of a place.

Big Idea

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • The Southwest art scene: Visitors will learn about the

early 20th century phenomenon of artists visiting the Southwest

  • Southwestern culture: Visitors will learn more about

the context and culture of the Southwest

  • Artistic approach/style: Visitors will explore the varied

approaches to still-life painting employed by Georgia O’Keeffe and her contemporaries

  • About O’Keeffe: Visitors will explore Georgia O’Keeffe’s

life, career, and fascination with the Southwest

  • Defining still life: Visitors will expand their

understanding of what a still-life is and what it can convey.

Learning Outcomes

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Interpretive Plan

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Text Content Development Process

Interpretation Plan & Layout

Revision by Editor Production by Design Revision by Interpretation First draft by Curator

* This includes labels, wall-graphics, didactics, other text-based interpretation.

Installation Proof review by Editor Test sample labels with visitors (if appropriate)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Audiovisual Content Development

Interpretation Plan

Interviews

  • r filming

Editing by Media Producer Revision by Curator Interview questions by Interpretation Revision by Curator Upload content into technology tool Installation Test with visitors (if appropriate)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Participatory & Hands on Experiences

Interpretation Plan

Approval by Core team and Conservation Concept Proposal by Interpretation Development or Fabrication Installation Test prototype with visitors Test with visitors (if necessary) Specification & Design Review by core team

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Benefits

  • Increased visitor satisfaction
  • New ways of measuring

success

  • Key messages are

communicated more effectively

  • Better integration and

usage of interpretative and participatory experiences

Challenges

  • Resistance mostly from

curatorial staff

– Fear that exhibition is dumbed down – Fear that interpretation tools might distract the visitor from experiencing art

  • Resistance from other
  • rganizations (canned

shows) that are not willing to modify their show

  • More time-consuming
  • More contentious
slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Audience Research & Evaluation

slide-21
SLIDE 21

n=576

21% 21% 27% 31%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

Art Deco Automobiles Duesenbergs Automobile Masterpieces Concept Cars

Front-End: Automobile Design

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Formative: Robert Indiana

Visitors’ interests:

  • Artist’s life (30/40)
  • Inspiration (30/40)
  • Process/technique

(26/40)

  • Artist’s or other’s

explanation about the meaning behind the work (7/40)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Formative: Star Studio Focus Group

slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28

www.imamuseum.org/autoportrait

Remedial: Prototype Testing

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Summative: Exhibition Evaluations

  • Assess if learning
  • utcomes have been met
  • Assess if expectations

regarding level of satisfaction, and use of interpretive tools have been met

  • Identify problems that

might be addressed in future exhibitions

  • Audience demographics

& psychographics

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Snapshot Exhibition Observation

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Elements Used

  • Gallery 2 had the highest percentage of observed element usage in the exhibition
  • The biggest drop in the percentage of elements used is after gallery 5, this is

particularly true for extended labels and artworks

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 % Usage of Exhibition Elements Gallery # Extended Labels Simple Labels Artworks

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Creating Participatory Experiences

slide-33
SLIDE 33
  • Engage visitors in

innovative ways

  • Develop new

audiences

  • Reinforce the

perception of a museum as a more inclusive

  • rganization

Participatory Experiences: Why?

slide-34
SLIDE 34

MY SNAPSHOT

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Browse by popular tags Search for topic, photographer, title View entries by:

  • Most popular
  • Most recent
  • Most viewed
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Comment using Facebook account Embed, Share, Flag Vote View related photos

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Onsite Component

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Key Numbers

  • 2,681 photos submitted
  • 552 photographers
  • 33,000 visit to the website
  • 11.3% of photos with

comments

  • Most Popular: 2,897 votes
slide-39
SLIDE 39

Inspired by Matisse

slide-40
SLIDE 40
slide-41
SLIDE 41
slide-42
SLIDE 42
slide-43
SLIDE 43

IMA: https://www.imamuseum.org/inspiredbymatisse/

slide-44
SLIDE 44
slide-45
SLIDE 45
slide-46
SLIDE 46
  • 3,922 drawings

submitted

  • 30,709, visits
  • Most popular: 1,457

votes

  • 3% of drawings with

comments

Key Numbers

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Create Your Autoportrait

slide-48
SLIDE 48
slide-49
SLIDE 49
slide-50
SLIDE 50
slide-51
SLIDE 51
slide-52
SLIDE 52
slide-53
SLIDE 53

http://www.imamuseum.org/autoportrait

slide-54
SLIDE 54
slide-55
SLIDE 55
  • # of autoportraits made:

3,706

  • Survey:

– 40% of exhibition visitors have created an autoportrait

  • 4,132 visits online by 1,248

visitors

Key Numbers

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Pointillize Yourself

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Questions?

sfantoni@imamuseum.org