Public Involvement Survey Results CTP Survey Results: Overview - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
public involvement survey results ctp survey results
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Public Involvement Survey Results CTP Survey Results: Overview - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dec 05, 2023 388 likes •731 views

Franklin County Comprehensive Transportation Plan Public Involvement Survey Results CTP Survey Results: Overview Survey released in Fall 2007 Local businesses / government offices Newspaper Direct mail Online Responses

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Public Involvement Survey Results

Franklin County Comprehensive Transportation Plan

slide-2
SLIDE 2

CTP Survey Results: Overview

Survey released in Fall 2007

Local businesses / government offices Newspaper Direct mail Online

Responses

  • 582 total responses
  • 206 from Direct Mail surveys (35% )
  • 376 from General Public surveys (65% )
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Q1: Transportation Goals

Transportation Goals

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Mode Choices Public Transit Options Faster Travel Times Community/Rural Preservation Environmental Protection Economic Growth Service of Special Needs

Level of Importance

Mailed Rating Average Full Rating Average

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Q1: Transportation Goals

Transportation Goals

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Mode Choices Public Transit Options Faster Travel Times Community/Rural Preservation Environmental Protection Economic Growth Service of Special Needs

Level of Importance

Mailed Rating Average Full Rating Average

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Q2: Capacity Improvement Strategies

Capacity Improvement Strategies

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 More travel lanes Limit development Access Control Intersection Improvements

Level of Importance

Mailed Rating Average Full Rating Average

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Q3: Specific Crash Problems?

Crash Problems?

0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% Yes No

Mailed Response Percent Full Response Percent

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Q3: Specific Crash Problems?

More than 20 responses

US 401 401 & Tarboro Rd Downtown Bunn US 1 & Holden Bickett Blvd

More than 10 responses

US 1 & Burt Winston NC 56 – various Ronald Tharrington & 56 US 1 - various

More than 5 responses

96 & 1A in Youngsville 96 & 401 US 1 in Youngsville 98 & 96 Darius Pearce Rd Mays Crossroads Mt Olivet & 56

  • E. River Rd & 56
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Q4: Too Much Congestion?

Too much congestion?

0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% Yes No Mailed Response Percent Full Response Percent

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Q5: Is Truck Traffic a Problem?

Is Truck Traffic a Problem?

0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00%

Yes No Mailed Response Percent Full Response Percent

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Q6: Improved Access Needed

Where would you like improved access to?

0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% D u r h a m H e n d e r s

  • n

R a l e i g h R

  • c

k y M

  • u

n t W a k e F

  • r

e s t W a r r e n t

  • n

I

  • 8

5 U S 1 U S 4 1 U S 6 4 V i r g i n i a O t h e r N

  • n

e Mailed Response Percent Full Response Percent

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Q7: Prioritize Roads for Improvement (1 = most important)

Road Priorities (All Surveys)

50 100 150 200 250 300

Priority Number # Responses

US 401 to Louisburg 280 46 24 34 19 19 NC 39 18 73 56 65 71 74 NC 96 including Youngsville Bypass 39 61 91 84 57 17 NC 56 including Franklinton Bypass 20 77 78 73 73 30 Cedar Creek Road 16 28 42 40 76 138 US 1 70 89 70 41 32 52 1 2 3 4 5 6

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Q7: Prioritize Roads for Improvement (1 = most important)

Road Priorities (Mailed Surveys)

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Priority Number # Responses

US 401 to Louisburg 90 13 7 6 2 3 NC 39 5 25 11 16 19 13 NC 96 including Youngsville Bypass 9 17 29 21 8 1 NC 56 including Franklinton Bypass 5 12 21 18 20 6 Cedar Creek Road 2 7 7 8 18 38 US 1 23 24 13 10 7 12 1 2 3 4 5 6

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Q8: Multi-modal Options

Sidewalks (all)

33% 67% Yes No

Off-road Trails/Greenways (all)

29% 71% Yes No

On-road Bike Facilities (all)

20% 80% Yes No

Bus Service to Henderson (all)

13% 87% Yes No

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Q8: Multi-modal Options

Bus Service to Durham (all)

18% 82% Yes No

Commuter Rail (all)

44% 56% Yes No

Park-n-Ride (all)

33% 67% Yes No
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Q9: Multi-modal Locations Desired

Sidewalks

In Towns Bickett Blvd US 401, NC 98 & NC 96

Off-Road Trails

Rail-Trails Between Towns (Bunn, Franklinton, Youngsville, Louisburg,

Wake Forest, Wakefield)

Park & Ride Lots

To RTP To Raleigh Louisburg to Raleigh Along US 1 & US 401

On-Road Bike Facilities

Along major thoroughfares Connecting Towns

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Q10: Key Transportation Issues

Traffic congestion High volumes Safety / speed issues Lack of pedestrian / multi-modal options Too many/ not enough signals Lack of infrastructure to support

development

Pavement conditions Truck traffic problems

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Q11: Other Roads Needing Attention

Mays Crossroads NC 581 Local unpaved roads/ subdivision roads NC 98

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Q12: Public Policy Issues

Development/Transportation Policy (all) 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 New development should

  • nly be allowed if the

current roadway network will support these new developments without creating poor traffic conditions (e.g. congestion). Franklin County should establish a transportation plan to address the transportation needs of the county and establish a funding mechanism to address key elements of that transportation plan. Franklin County should develop land as much as possible now and depend

  • n the State and Federal

governments to meet our future transportation needs, even if it means more traffic in the short term. # Responses Agree Neutral Disagree

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Q12: Public Policy Issues

Development/Transportation Policy (mailed) 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 New development should

  • nly be allowed if the

current roadway network will support these new developments without creating poor traffic conditions (e.g. congestion). Franklin County should establish a transportation plan to address the transportation needs of the county and establish a funding mechanism to address key elements of that transportation plan. Franklin County should develop land as much as possible now and depend

  • n the State and Federal

governments to meet our future transportation needs, even if it means more traffic in the short term. # Responses Agree Neutral Disagree

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Q13: Alternative Transportation Funding Sources

Support for Alternative Funding

0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00%

L

  • c

a l s a l e s t a x L

  • c

a l p r

  • p

e r t y t a x S t a t e

  • r

F e d e r a l g a s t a x S t a t e

  • r

F e d e r a l i n c

  • m

e t a x A d d i t i

  • n

a l b

  • n

d s T

  • l

l s M a n d a t

  • r

y d e v e l

  • p

e r c

  • n

t r i b u t i

  • n

s V

  • l

u n t a r y d e v e l

  • p

e r c

  • n

t r i b u t i

  • n

s I m p a c t f e e s T r a n s f e r f e e s / T a x

  • n

r e a l t y N

  • n

e

  • f

t h e a b

  • v

e

Mailed Response Percent Full Response Percent

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Q14: Prefer Regional or Local Improvements?

Regional vs Local Improvements

0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% Regional Local No preference Mailed Response Percent Full Response Percent

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Q15 – 18: KARTS Triangle Connector

Heard of Triangle Connector? 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 40.00% 45.00% 50.00% 55.00% 60.00% 65.00% 70.00% 75.00% Yes No Mailed Response Percent Full Response Percent

Would you use Triangle Connector?

0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% Yes No Mail Response Percent Full Response Percent

How many times/ month would you ride? Average 3.5 times per month

Would expanding the route increase your usage?

0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00% Yes No Mailed Response Percent Full Response Percent

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Q19: Access Control

Support for Traffic Control Measures (all)

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 Would you support having medians with periodic turn lanes instead of continuous middle left-turn lanes on major roads? Would you support the restriction or reduction

  • f driveways on major roads?

Yes No

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Q20: Southeast High Speed Rail

Consider using SEHSR?

0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% Yes No Mailed Response Percent Full Response Percent

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Q21: Age

Age

0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00%

Under 18 18 – 24 25 – 34 35 – 44 45 – 64 65 – 74 Over 74 Mailed Response Percent Full Response Percent 2006 State Demographics

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Q22: Race

Response Demographics: Race

0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00% 100.00% White Black Native American Hispanic Asian Other

Mailed Survey Response Percent CENSUS % Full Survey Response Percent

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Q23 & 24: Household Size/Income

Household Size Average Household Size 2000 Census: 2.58

0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00% 100.00% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 or more Mailed Response % Full Response %

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Median HH Income: $38,968 Mailed Response Percent Full Response Percent

Household Income

No Answer Above Median HH Income Below Median HH Income

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Q25: Where do you live?

Response Locations

0.00% 2.00% 4.00% 6.00% 8.00% 10.00% 12.00% 14.00% 16.00% 18.00% 20.00% Bunn Centerville Franklinton Louisburg Wake Forest Youngsville Cedar Rock Township Cypress Creek Township Dunn Township Franklinton Township Gold Mine Township Harris Township Hayesville Township Louisburg Township Sandy Creek Township Youngsville Township I do NOT live in Franklin County

Town or Township Mailed Response Percent Full Response Percent

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Q26: Where did you find the survey?

How did you learn about this survey?

0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 40.00% S u r v e y w a s m a i l e d t

  • y
  • u

N e w s p a p e r P r i v a t e B u s i n e s s C i v i c G r

  • u

p G

  • v

e r n m e n t B u i l d i n g C h u r c h W e b s i t e L i n k S c h

  • l

O t h e r ( p l e a s e s p e c i f y )

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Q27: Want to be kept informed?

127 email addresses collected

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Survey Observations

A few under-represented groups in county

(age, race)

Very good participation – 582 responses 60-70% support developer contributions

to pay for infrastructure

No strong support for alternative

transportation (bike, pedestrian or transit)

Focused on major roads: 1, 98, 96 & 56

and most important by far is 401

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Survey Observations

Your observations? Comments? Questions?

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Franklin County CTP Committee

  • Patrick Young, Franklin Co Planning Director
  • Tammy Ray, Franklinton Planning Director
  • Brenda Robbins, Youngsville Manager
  • Linda Pippin, Bunn Commissioner
  • Gary Faulkner, Citizen
  • Matthew Winslow, Citizen
  • Richie Duncan, Franklin Co Economic Development Commission
  • Al Corpening, Town of Youngsville
  • Chip Russell, Town of Wake Forest Planning Director
  • Julie Bollinger, NCDOT
  • Scott Walston, NCDOT
  • Shelby Powell, Kerr-Tar RPO
  • Geraldine Dumas, Kerr-Tar RPO
  • Kenneth Withrow, Capital Area MPO

http: / / www.ncdot.org/ doh/ preconstruct/ tpb/ planning/ franklincounty.html