university of tasmania
play

University of Tasmania Travel Behaviour Survey 2017 SUMMARY OF - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

University of Tasmania Travel Behaviour Survey 2017 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Anna Lyth Corey Peterson & Kamal Singh RED Sustainability Consultants Commercial Services & Development, University of Tasmania About the University of Tasmania


  1. University of Tasmania Travel Behaviour Survey 2017 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Anna Lyth Corey Peterson & Kamal Singh RED Sustainability Consultants Commercial Services & Development, University of Tasmania

  2. About the University of Tasmania Travel Behaviour Surveys  UTAS Travel Behaviour Survey (TBS) initiated in 2012  Three datasets: 2013, 2015, 2017  What the UTAS TBS provides: tracks UTAS staff and student travel behaviour associated with  university business (work and study land based) data for all campuses in all regions in which UTAS has operations  (Tasmania and NSW) informs planning and performance indicators that underpin the  University’s sustainable transport strategies databases for further in-depth research (students/academic use) 

  3. Changing transport planning backdrop 40000 Off-campus� (online/remote) 35000 On� Campus� � � � � � 30000  Reduced proportion of student enrolments as ‘ on- enrolments� (in� some� capacity) 25000 campus’ despite a significant increase in enrolments 20000 Student� 15000 10000 5000  Increase in share of ‘on -campus ’ international 0 students (particularly Hobart and Launceston) Year� 2013 Year� 2016 Source:UTAS� student� enrolments� March,� and� UTAS�Statistical� Snapshot� data  Dispersal of students and staff across Hobart CBD facilities – to continue into future with UTAS expansion programs in Launceston, Hobart and Burnie city centres

  4. Working internally and with external partners - Improvements implemented since 2015 Tasmanian public transport service improvements:  higher frequency/through-service bus routes in Launceston and  Hobart high frequency bus services linking Launceston campuses to CBD  Infrastructure upgrades:  >250 bicycle parking, lockers/hubs, end-of-trip facilities  bus shelter installations/upgrades – Newnham, Inveresk, West Park, Sandy Bay  >25 more motorcycle/scooter parking spaces  availability of car pool parking permits and dedicated spaces  Videoconference Improvement Program (VCIP)  Decide Your Ride online videos and maps informing safest  bicycle routes Increase in parking permit costs 

  5. Method, response, confidence  2 online surveys – staff and 3000 students (similar questions) 2500 2000 1500  2671 responses overall (2017) 1000 500 0 Responses� (Yr� 2017)  90-95% confidence levels (high) Students 1976 Staff 695  Margin of error less than3%

  6. Results

  7. Journey to work and study  1 in 3 respondents reported their journeys to work or study at the University as multi-modal  Top two staff multi-modal  Top two student multi-modal journey types to university, 2017 journey types to university, 2017

  8. Students - Primary mode to study Change over time and by campus (2017) Students – All UTAS Students – by campus 2017 35.9 35.9 100% other 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 100 taxi/Uber other 90% 5.5 5.3 6.3 bicycle� (incl.� electric� bicycle) taxi/Uber 90 walk/run bicycle� (incl.� electric� bicycle) 80% 27.1 bus/train� 80 walk/run 30.2 31.0 70% motorcycle/scooter bus/train� 70 car� as� a� passenger motorcycle/scooter 60% % Share� drove� car� - multiple� occupants car� as� a� passenger 60 12.3 16.6 drove� car� - sole 24.0 drove� car� - multiple� occupants 50% Mode� 50 drove� car� - sole 0.9 0.9 7.4 0.8 40% 8.0 40 6.0 5.9 5.6 5.7 30% 30 20% 20 35.9 32.7 30.7 10% 10 0% 0 Year� 2013 Year� 2015 Year� 2017 Sandy� Bay Hobart� CBD Newnham Inveresk CC� &� RCS Sydney

  9. Primary mode change over time Students – south Students – north 0.3 0.2 0.0 1.6 0.7 0.2 100 100 0.1 other other 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 5.6 5.9 4.0 6.1 3.2 8.8 taxi/Uber taxi/Uber 90 90 bicycle� (incl.� electric� bicycle) bicycle� (incl.� electric� bicycle) walk/run walk/run 80 80 28.8 30.3 33.2 32.8 35.4 29.2 bus bus 70 70 motorcycle/scooter motorcycle/scooter car� as� a� passenger car� as� a� passenger 60 60 % 5.3 share� 9.6 drove� car� - multiple� occupants % drove� car� - multiple� occupants 0.7 share� 15.7 5.3 20.0 14.8 0.7 26.8 drove� car� - sole drove� car� - sole 50 50 Mode� 6.8 5.5 Mode� 0.0 1.0 2.1 1.1 6.2 8.1 40 40 7.4 8.1 1.0 6.2 5.6 5.5 30 30 4.9 44.9 20 20 38.6 35.4 31.0 28.4 26.3 10 10 0 0 Year� 2013 Year� 2015 Year� 2017 Year� 2013 Year� 2015 Year� 2017

  10. Primary mode change over time Students – Sandy Bay Students – Hobart CBD 0.3 1.2 0.0 0.7 0.6 0.0 100 100 other 0.1 0.2 0.0 other 0.0 0.2 0.0 4.3 5.9 4.9 6.7 9.7 8.4 taxi/Uber taxi/Uber 90 90 bicycle� (incl.� electric� bicycle) bicycle� (incl.� electric� bicycle) 24.9 walk/run walk/run 80 80 29.6 28.8 34.0 bus bus 31.4 37.0 70 motorcycle/scooter 70 motorcycle/scooter car� as� a� passenger car� as� a� passenger % 60 60 share� drove� car� - multiple� occupants drove� car� - multiple� occupants 14.3 28.2 19.2 drove� car� - sole drove� car� - sole 16.2 50 50 � % Mode� 1.7 share� 23.6 1.6 7.9 1.2 1.4 23.8 40 40 7.7 Mode� 6.7 9.8 6.4 1.2 4.9 5.2 0.0 30 4.2 30 9.1 5.3 3.7 4.8 20 20 33.4 31.4 29.4 28.2 21.3 10 10 19.4 0 0 Year� 2013 Year� 2015 Year� 2017 Year� 2013 Year� 2015 Year� 2017

  11. Primary mode change over time Students – Cradle Coast Students – Sydney 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 100% 100 0.0 0.0 0.0 other 2.7 0.0 6.9 0.0 1.6 0.0 other 10.7 6.8 taxi/Uber 14.6 12.2 taxi/Uber 90% 90 bicycle� (incl.� electric� bicycle) 13.8 bicycle� (incl.� electric� bicycle) 8.4 3.0 0.0 0.0 walk/run 80% walk/run 80 6.0 12.5 12.4 bus/train bus 0.0 70% 19.0 70 motorcycle/scooter motorcycle/scooter 14.4 8.3 42.9 4.3 car� as� a� passenger car� as� a� passenger 60% share� 8.3 60 % 1.7 drove� car� - multiple� occupants share� 3.4 drove� car� - multiple� occupants drove� car� - sole 8.6 drove� car� - sole Mode� 50% 50 Mode� 3.6 0.0 3.6 40% 40 64.9 62.1 30% 30 56.3 46.6 20% 39.3 20 no� data 10% 10 0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 Year� 2013 Year� 2015 Year� 2017 Year� 2013 Year� 2015 Year� 2017 Note: Year-to-year comparisons are to be taken with caution for these regions as sample sizes are small <100. Instead the data provides an indication of the mode share.

  12. Staff- Primary mode to work change over time and by campus (2017) Staff – All UTAS Staff – by campus 2017 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 100% 100 0.0 other 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.4 0.4 0.4 9.0 10.2 11.8 8.1 8.9 10.5 11.2 taxi/Uber 14.4 other 90% 90 0.0 bicycle� (incl.� electric� bicycle) 6.3 4.2 10.3 6.2 taxi/Uber 2.1 12.0 18.0 4.3 walk/run 80% 11.0 4.2 80 bicycle� (incl.� electric� bicycle) 6.6 3.4 2.0 0.0 bus 3.9 1.2 4.7 1.6 0.0 walk/run 5.0 1.0 13.7 4.8 70% motorcycle/scooter 70 5.7 9.0 14.4 bus/train� car� as� a� passenger 19.5 14.5 0.8 motorcycle/scooter 60% 16.0 9.0 60 12.7 % drove� car� - multiple� occupants share� 7.6 car� as� a� passenger drove� car� - sole 50% 50 drove� car� - multiple� occupants Mode� 11.9 88.2 drove� car� - sole 40% 40 64.2 30% 30 55.0 53.9 56.1 53.9 53.1 20% 39.8 20 10% 10 0% 0 Sandy� Bay Hobart� CBD Newnham Inveresk� &� LCS CC� &� RCS Year� 2013 Year� 2015 Year� 2017

  13. Primary mode change over time Staff – south Staff – north 1.5 1.1 0.0 100 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.5 100 0.3 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.9 other other 11.7 6.8 8.4 9.2 7.9 10.3 90 taxi/Uber taxi/Uber 4.4 90 1.7 1.9 7.8 7.6 bicycle� (incl.� electric� bicycle) bicycle� (incl.� electric� bicycle) 12.8 1.4 3.7 13.8 4.7 80 2.3 1.9 walk/run walk/run 80 7.3 4.7 4.0 0.7 4.1 bus 11.1 bus 5.7 1.6 1.2 70 5.0 5.1 1.3 10.2 motorcycle/scooter 70 13.1 motorcycle/scooter 6.3 car� as� a� passenger car� as� a� passenger 60 15.8 16.7 drove� car� - multiple� occupants 60 % drove� car� - multiple� occupants share� % 14.0 share� drove� car� - sole drove� car� - sole 50 50 Mode� Mode� 40 40 69.7 66.3 30 63.6 30 50.6 50.1 48.2 20 20 10 10 0 0 Year� 2013 Year� 2015 Year� 2017 Year� 2013 Year� 2015 Year� 2017

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend