public input meeting
play

Public Input Meeting September 14, 2011 Waterloo, IA Meeting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Public Input Meeting September 14, 2011 Waterloo, IA Meeting Format Introduction Background Public Input 2 Road System Studies/Initiatives 2002 ad hoc city/county/state initiative identified recommendations to increase


  1. Public Input Meeting September 14, 2011 Waterloo, IA

  2. Meeting Format • Introduction • Background • Public Input 2

  3. Road System Studies/Initiatives • 2002 ad hoc city/county/state initiative – identified recommendations to increase efficiency (adopted by legislature) • 2006 Road Use Tax Fund (RUTF) Study • 2008 TIME-21 Funding Analysis • 2011 Road Use Tax Fund Study – underway 3

  4. Actions by Individual Agencies • Counties – reduced staff by approximately 300 in last ten years • DOT – Reduced staff by 750 since 2002 – Eliminated 39 field offices/garages – Reduced number of vehicles in the fleet – Annual savings - $35 million 4

  5. 2011 RUTF Study • Per Code of Iowa, the DOT is required to review current revenue levels and projected construction and maintenance needs. • The report may include funding level recommendations. • Shall also evaluate alternative funding mechanisms. • Due every five years with first report due December 31, 2011. 5

  6. Governor’s Transportation 2020 Citizen Advisory Commission (CAC) • Designated by Governor Branstad March of 2011 • Tasks – Assist the Iowa Department of Transportation (DOT) in completing its legislatively mandated review of road needs and funding. – Seek public input conditions of Iowa’s roadway system, the importance of roads to Iowans and funding options. 6

  7. Governor’s Transportation 2020 Citizen Advisory Commission (CAC) • Nancy Richardson – Coralville Allan Thoms – Cedar Rapids  (Co-Chair) (Co-Chair) • Scott Cirksena – Clive Jeff Corkery – Peosta  • Catherine Dunn – Dubuque Geri Huser – Altoona  • Jim Kersten – Fort Dodge Lindsey Larson – Jefferson  Ann Trimble Ray – Early Rose Mitchell – West Des Moines  • Larry Winum – Glenwood  Dan Wiedemeier – Burlington • The following legislators are ex-officio members of the commission: Chair/Ranking Member of Senate Chair/Ranking Member of House Transportation Transportation Sen. Tom Rielly (D-Oskaloosa)  • Rep. David Tjepkes (R-Gowrie) Sen. Tim Kapucian (R-Keystone)  • Rep. Jim Lykam (D-Davenport) 7

  8. Iowa’s Public Roadway System Jurisdiction Length (miles) # of Bridges State 9,403 4,092 County 89,911 19,386 City 14,804 1,111 Other 623 210 Total 114,740 24,799 8

  9. Evaluation of Recent Trends • Iowa’s infrastructure rankings continue to drop 2009 Ranking 2010 Ranking Category (based on 2007 data) (based on 2008 data) Change Rural Interstate Condition* 34th 38th -4 Urban Interstate Condition* 43rd 43rd 0 Rural Arterial Condition* 43rd 46th -3 Deficient Bridges 30th 34th -4 Source: Annual Report on the Performance of State Highway Systems , Reason Foundation, David T. Hartgen, Ph.D., P.E., and Ravi K. Karanam, December 2009 and September 2010 * Based on road roughness 9

  10. 10

  11. State Road Funding State Constitution FY 2011 Funding Source Percent of Total Requires Funds be (estimated) Used for Roads? Fuel Tax $430 million 36 percent Yes Annual Registration $470 million 39 percent Yes Fee Fee for New $240 million 20 percent Yes Registration Other* $70 million 5 percent No Total $1.21 billion * Driver’s license fees, title fees, trailer registration fees, and other miscellaneous fees. 11

  12. History of RUTF Revenue $1,300 $1,200 $1,100 Millions $1,000 $900 $800 $700 $600 $500 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Actual Receipts Constant 1997 Dollars 12

  13. Challenges • “Perfect Storm” – Large and aging system – Increasing demands – Flattening revenue – Increasing construction cost inflation rate • Impact of severe weather – Immediate damage to infrastructure – Deferred maintenance due to shift in operational activities to address weather impacts. – Unquantifiable loss of useful life due to underlying damage to infrastructure 13

  14. 14

  15. 15

  16. Local Challenges • At-grade intersections on US 218 • University Avenue corridor needs between Waterloo and Cedar Falls • The six county region has 1,961 bridges and nearly 35 percent are below minimum standards • Larger and heavier ag equipment is negatively impacting infrastructure 16

  17. Evaluation of Recent Trends • Continued impacts on the system due to severe weather. • Condition of the system continues to deteriorate. • Short-term growth in revenue to TIME-21 grandfathering provisions. • Overall traffic and truck traffic has begun to grow again. • Construction costs rising (5.4 percent through the second quarter of CY 2011). • Less federal funding likely. • Higher vehicle fuel economy cutting fuel tax revenues. 17

  18. Evaluation of Critical Needs • Forecast revenues will fall short of meeting critical funding needs by $215 million per year • Impacts of critical funding shortfall – Increased numbers of bridges with weight restrictions and bridge closures – Deteriorating conditions across the system – including high-level roads critical to movement of goods and people – Increased costs to transportation providers and users – Potential economic losses to the state of Iowa 18

  19. Funding Options (existing) • Fuel tax • Annual registration fee • Fee for new registration • Driver’s license fee 19

  20. Funding Options (potential) • Sales tax on fuel • Severance tax on ethanol • Per-mile tax • Transportation Improvement District • Tolling • Development impact fees • Bonding (financing mechanism) • Public private partnerships (financing mechanism) • Container tax • Imported oil tax • Tire tax on light-duty vehicles • Alternative fuel/high fuel efficiency vehicle tax 20

  21. Now it’s your turn! • How is Iowa’s road system important to you? • What are your views regarding the condition of Iowa’s public road system? Is the condition having an impact on you today? • If you feel additional funding is needed, what mechanisms ought to be considered? • If you don’t feel additional funding is needed, what ought to be done differently? • How do you feel road funds should be utilized? (e.g. capacity projects, pavement preservation, bridge preservation, new roads, etc.) 21

  22. More Information • www.iowadot.gov/transportation2020 • Additional comments or questions can be submitted through the Transportation 2020 website – click on “Contact us” button along left side of website 22

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend