Proposal: c annabis c ultivation Proposal: onsite syste ms Se pte - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

proposal c annabis c ultivation proposal onsite syste ms
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Proposal: c annabis c ultivation Proposal: onsite syste ms Se pte - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Re g ula tio n 84 Re c la ime d Wa te r Sta ke ho lde r Me e ting Proposal: c annabis c ultivation Proposal: onsite syste ms Se pte mbe r 26, 2017 Wo rksho p wo rkb o o k is a va ila b le he re fo r do wnlo a d: http:/ / c o lo wq fo rum.o


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Re g ula tio n 84 Re c la ime d Wa te r Sta ke ho lde r Me e ting

Se pte mbe r 26, 2017

Proposal: c annabis c ultivation Proposal: onsite syste ms

T hank yo u fo r par tic ipating!

Wo rksho p wo rkb o o k is a va ila b le he re fo r do wnlo a d: http:/ / c o lo wq fo rum.o rg / wo rkg ro up-re c la ime d-wa te r.html

slide-2
SLIDE 2

We lc ome

Brandi Honeycutt Environmental Protection S pecialist Permits S ection Water Quality Control Division CDPHE Trisha Oeth Administrator Water Quality Control Commission CDPHE

slide-3
SLIDE 3

We lc ome & Ove rvie w

Lisa Beutler Executive Facilitator S tantec

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Wo rksho p Go a ls

Pro vide sta ke ho lde rs a n o ve rvie w o f the pro po se d c ha ng e s to Re g ula tio n 84 a nd re g ula to ry pro c e ss Re c e ive input fro m pa rtic ipa nts o n b e ne fits, c o nc e rns, a nd a dditio na l c o nside ra tio ns re g a rding this pro po se d use o f re c yc le d wa te r

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Welcome and Overview Opening Remarks Topics for discussion Topic 1: Cannabis cultivation 1. Background on cannabis cultivation and water use 2. Overview of regulatory proposal 3. Discussion Topic 2: Centralized and onsite treatment systems 1. Definition of centralized and onsite systems 2. Overview of regulatory proposal 3. Discussion Topic 3: To be determined by stakeholders Wrap up, closing comments, evaluation, adjourn

Wo rksho p Ag e nda I te ms

30 minutes o f

disc ussio n

90 minutes o f

disc ussio n

Page 3 in WB

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Gro und “Rule s”

Co me pre pare d fo r the sc he dule d disc ussio n. Spe ak up so that e ve ryo ne c an he ar. Only o ne pe rso n sho uld spe ak at a time . Be c o nc ise . Avo id pe rso nal attac ks. Be re spe c tful o f o the rs’ pe rspe c tive s and re spo nsib ilitie s. So rt fo r similaritie s that may e xist in spite o f diffe re nc e s. L iste n c are fully and re spo nd in a manne r that mo ve s the disc ussio n fo rward. Cle arly ide ntify re maining diffe re nc e s that are no t re so lve d. Avo id sne ak attac ks. Re spe c t the pro c e ss b y le tting o the rs kno w o f po sitio ns and ac tio ns that will b e take n re g arding the issue s b e ing disc usse d. De c isio n making me tho d: Co nse nsus (e ve ryo ne unde rstands and c an live with the de c isio n), F all b ac k me tho d: Mino rity re po rt Avo id e nd runs. Re spe c t the pro c e ss b y le tting o the rs kno w if diffe re nc e s re main that will b e purse d in o the r ve nue s (e .g . dire c tly with o the r me mb e rs in the e xe c utive and/o r le g islative b ranc he s o f state o r fe de ral g o ve rnme nt. I de ntify c o nve rsatio ns that are n’ t wo rking . Bac ktrac k fro m po o r re sults.

http://colowqforum.org/pdfs/code-of- conduct/CWQF%20Code%20of%20Conduct.pdf

Page 4 in WB

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Ope ning Re ma rks

Damian Higham S enior Planner Recycled Water Program Denver Water

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Fort Collins Denver Colorado Springs

  • Re gulation 84
  • Non- potable use s
  • 5.2 billion gallons

pe r ye ar (16,000 AF Y)

  • f potable wate r

save d

  • Non- potable
  • Se par

ate distr ibution syste ms

Water Reuse in Colorado

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Wastewater Treatment Process Preliminary Primary Secondary Tertiary/Advanced Disinfection Treatment Targets Large materials (rags, plastic bags, rocks, etc.) Medium particles & floating oils/grease Organic matter (compounds that would drop oxygen levels in receiving river) & some removal of trace chemical constituents and pathogens Some facilities go one step further to reduce pollutants of special concern (nitrogen, phosphorus, particles) & some removal of trace chemical constituents and pathogens Kill pathogens Industrial Pre-Treatment Treatment Targets Pollutants of special concern (some toxic chemicals, metals, pesticides, etc.) Recycled Water Treatment Process Advanced Disinfection Treatment Targets Pollutants of special concern (particles, pathogens) are removed by various treatment methods; some removal of trace chemical constituents, etc. is achieved Kill pathogens

Non-Potable Recycled Water Domestic Wastewater Industrial Wastewater Wastewater Effluent Treated Wastewater Conventional water treatment plant Potable Water Other water sources

Centralized Recycled Water Treatment (conceptual)

Page 12 in WB

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Colorado Water Plan

  • “The CDPHE is committed to working with stakeholders to ensure

that health and environment are protected while water reuse expands”

  • 2050 annual M&I supply-demand gap could be as high as 560,000

AFY

  • 8 Actions specific to increasing reuse in Colorado

– Increasing funding and incentives for water recycling and expanding the list of uses for which recycled water can be applied.

9/27/2017 10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Strategies to meet the supply gap

  • Agricultural water transfers
  • Growth into existing supplies
  • In-basin projects
  • New transbasin projects
  • Water storage
  • Water conservation and reuse

9/27/2017 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Strategies to meet the supply gap

  • Agricultural water transfers
  • Growth into existing supplies
  • In-basin projects
  • New transbasin projects
  • Water storage
  • Water conservation and reuse

9/27/2017 12

Politically Sensitive

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Denver Water: Proponent for New Uses under Reg 84

9/27/2017 13

Currently Allowed New Uses Being Proposed

  • Industrial reuse (evaporative,

washwater, and non-evaporative industrial processes)

  • Non-discharging construction and

road maintenance

  • Zoo operations
  • Commercial laundries
  • Automated and manual vehicle

washing

  • Landscape irrigation (restricted,

unrestricted, and resident-control)

  • Agricultural irrigation (non-food crop

irrigation and silviculture)

  • Nonresidential and residential fire

protection

  • Indoor urinal and toilet flushing
  • Irrigation of cannabis

Page 8 in WB

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Current major types of water reuse practiced in Colorado Potential paradigm for water reuse practice in Colorado

Cooling and other industrial uses Landscape irrigation (seasonal) Non-food crop irrigation (seasonal) Cooling and other industrial uses Landscape irrigation (seasonal) Other non-food crop irrigation (seasonal)

?

Toilet flushing (year round) Cannabis irrigation (year-round)

Denver Water: Proponent for New Uses under Reg 84

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Colorado Reclaimed Water

9/27/2017 15

Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Minimum Treatment Secondary Treatment with Disinfection Secondary Treatment with Filtration and Disinfection Secondary Treatment with Filtration and Disinfection

  • E. coli/100 mL

Limit 126 monthly geometric mean and 235 single sample max 126 monthly geometric mean and 235 single sample max None in 75% samples and 126 single sample max Turbidity Limit (NTU) < 3 monthly average and max 5 in <5% samples in a month < 3 monthly average and max 5 in <5% samples in a month Total Suspended Solids Limit 30 mg/L daily max Allowable Uses Industrial (evaporative, non- discharging construction and road maintenance, and non- evaporative industrial processes) Landscape irrigation (restricted) Commercial (zoo operations) Agricultural irrigation (Non- food crop irrigation and silviculture) Industrial (Category 1 uses, and washwater applications) Landscape irrigation (Category 1 uses, and unrestricted) Commercial (Category 1 uses, laundries, and automated and manual vehicle washing) Fire Protection (Nonresidential) Agricultural irrigation (Category 1 uses) Industrial (Category 2 uses) Landscape irrigation (Category 2 uses, and resident controlled) Commercial (Category 2 uses) Fire Protection (Category 2 uses and residential fire protection) Agricultural irrigation (Category 1 uses)

Page 7 in WB

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Pre mise s

Pro mo ting the use

  • f re c la ime d wa te r

while pro te c ting pub lic he a lth a nd the e nviro nme nt is the pa ra mo unt g o a l o f Re g 84. Ne wly pe rmitte d use s wo uld c re a te a dditio na l wa te r supply in a stre sse d syste m.

Po ta b le wa te r ma y no t b e ne c e ssa ry fo r c a nna b is c ultiva tio n & to ile t flushing . Ne wly pe rmitte d use s wo uld a llo w De nve r Wa te r to ta ke full a dva nta g e o f e xisting infra struc ture .

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Co nte xt o f Disc ussio n T

  • pic s

Regulation

  • Enforceable
  • Items that need to be

codified in regulation to protect public health and the environment

  • Requires a

Commission hearing to modify

  • Notional example:

Approved uses of recycled water Policy

  • Supports enforcement
  • CDPHE interpretation
  • f the regulation;

provides specific requirements

  • Can be modified by

CDPHE staff with approval by the commission; allows flexibility to incorporate new science

  • Notional example:

approved treatment processes Guidance

  • Non-enforceable
  • Best practices and

information to help utilities comply

  • Developed by CDPHE

staff

  • Notional example:

Procedures for cleaning the distribution system Not in scope

  • Items of important

consideration in implementation, but not within the scope of a potential change to

  • Reg. 84 or

supplemental guidance

  • Notional example:

Cost of dual-plumbing a facility

slide-18
SLIDE 18

T

  • pic 1: Cannabis c ultivation

Damian Higham S enior Planner Recycled Water Program Denver Water

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Why Denver Water Cares About the Cannabis Industry

  • The industry is our customer
  • Cannabis cultivation is very visible, discussed sector
  • Be proactive
  • Provide insight and leadership for other utilities
  • Cannabis cultivation facilities located near existing

recycled water distribution (“purple pipe”)

  • Winter water use

9/27/2017 19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

9/27/2017 20 Grow and sales operations in the Denver Water service area Data from March 2017

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Use of Water in Cannabis Cultivation

  • Water use is efficient

– Water use in this industry is better than many – Efficiency benchmark highly dependent on how grown

  • Grow facilities

– Indoor – Greenhouse – Field

9/27/2017 21

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • Types of irrigation

Hydroponic or soil Hand or automated Indoor or outdoor

Use of Water in Cannabis Cultivation

9/27/2017 22

Water and nutrients monitored Hydroponic system avoids waste Pretreatment and water storage (for temp. equil.)

  • Water is highly managed

Avoid touching leaves Avoid standing water (pests and humidity) Nutrient levels monitored closely Some facilities pre-treat the water

Carbon filters Reverse osmosis (RO)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Colorado Reclaimed Water

9/27/2017 23

Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Minimum Treatment Secondary Treatment with Disinfection Secondary Treatment with Filtration and Disinfection Secondary Treatment with Filtration and Disinfection

  • E. coli/100 mL

Limit 126 monthly geometric mean and 235 single sample max 126 monthly geometric mean and 235 single sample max None in 75% samples and 126 single sample max Turbidity Limit (NTU) < 3 monthly average and max 5 in <5% samples in a month < 3 monthly average and max 5 in <5% samples in a month Total Suspended Solids Limit 30 mg/L daily max Allowable Uses Industrial (evaporative, non- discharging construction and road maintenance, and non- evaporative industrial processes) Landscape irrigation (restricted) Commercial (zoo operations) Agricultural irrigation (Non- food crop irrigation and silviculture) Industrial (Category 1 uses, and washwater applications) Landscape irrigation (Category 1 uses, and unrestricted) Commercial (Category 1 uses, laundries, and automated and manual vehicle washing) Fire Protection (Nonresidential) Agricultural irrigation (Category 1 uses) Industrial (Category 2 uses) Landscape irrigation (Category 2 uses, and resident controlled) Commercial (Category 2 uses) Fire Protection (Category 2 uses and residential fire protection) Agricultural irrigation (Category 1 uses)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Colorado Reclaimed Water

9/27/2017 24

Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Minimum Treatment Secondary Treatment with Disinfection Secondary Treatment with Filtration and Disinfection Secondary Treatment with Filtration and Disinfection

  • E. coli/100 mL

Limit 126 monthly geometric mean and 235 single sample max 126 monthly geometric mean and 235 single sample max None in 75% samples and 126 single sample max Comment

Based on values in EPA recreational water quality standards, which are “designed to protect primary contact recreation, including swimming, bathing, surfing, water skiing, tubing, water play by children, and similar water contact activities where a high degree

  • f bodily contact with the water, immersion

and ingestion are likely.” (Estimated rate of GI illness = 36 NGI in 1,000 primary contact recreators) Note: In 2012 EPA guidance moved to a statistical threshold value (STV) instead of a single sample max. Risk is equivalent. Exceeds EPA recreational water quality standards Exceeds Colorado Regulation 31 primary contact recreation standards

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Colorado Reclaimed Water

9/27/2017 25

Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Minimum Treatment Secondary Treatment with Disinfection Secondary Treatment with Filtration and Disinfection Secondary Treatment with Filtration and Disinfection

  • E. coli/100 mL

Limit 126 monthly geometric mean and 235 single sample max 126 monthly geometric mean and 235 single sample max None in 75% samples and 126 single sample max

Use

  • E. coli (CFU/100 mL)

During growing activities using a direct water application method (1) < 126 (as a geometric mean) (2) < 410 (as a statistical threshold value) Special conditions (e.g. sprouts, direct contact during/after harvest, hand washing, washing food contact surfaces) None detectable; water must not be untreated

USDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) Requirements for irrigation water: EPA & CO rec. water quality stds.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Colorado Reclaimed Water

9/27/2017 26

Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Minimum Treatment Secondary Treatment with Disinfection Secondary Treatment with Filtration and Disinfection Secondary Treatment with Filtration and Disinfection

  • E. coli/100 mL

Limit 126 monthly geometric mean and 235 single sample max 126 monthly geometric mean and 235 single sample max None in 75% samples and 126 single sample max

Use

  • E. coli (CFU/100 mL)

During growing activities using a direct water application method (1) < 126 (as a geometric mean) (2) < 410 (as a statistical threshold value) Special conditions (e.g. sprouts, direct contact during/after harvest, hand washing, washing food contact surfaces) None detectable; water must not be untreated

USDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) Requirements for irrigation water: Proposal: Cat. 2 & 3 water for cannabis cultivation (meets or exceeds FSMA)

slide-27
SLIDE 27
  • 1. Cross-connection control

A. Link to Reg 11

  • 2. Backup potable supply
  • 3. Signage
  • 4. Training
  • 5. Operational monitoring and reporting

A. O&M Manual B. Qualified personnel C. Routine & incident reporting

  • 6. Disinfectant residual

Management and Site Controls (Implementation Options)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Disc ussion

  • 1. What are your general impressions of the proposal to use

highly treated recycled water for cannabis cultivation?

  • 2. What are the benefits and disadvantages of using one

category or another of reclaimed for this proposed use?

  • 3. What, if any, recommendations do you have?

Page 24 in WB

slide-29
SLIDE 29

T

  • pic 2: Ce ntr

alize d and Onsite T r e atme nt Syste ms

Dan Arnold Denver Water

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Domestic Wastewater (collected locally)

Decentralized Water Reuse Treatment Process Preliminary Primary Secondary Tertiary/Advanced Disinfection Treatment Targets Large materials (rags, plastic bags, rocks, etc.) Medium particles & floating oils/grease Organic matter (compounds that would drop oxygen levels in receiving river) & some removal of trace chemical constituents and pathogens Pollutants of special concern (particles, pathogens) are removed by various treatment methods; some removal of trace chemical constituents, etc. is achieved Kill pathogens

Non-Potable Recycled Water Note: System includes a backup connection to municipal sewer for emergency discharge Potable Water (from conventional municipal drinking water treatment plant)

Property line – treatment is physically located on property where wastewater is collected

Onsite Recycled Water Treatment (conceptual)

Page 13 in WB

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Propose d Re g ula tory De line a tion

  • Centralized systems
  • Municipally operated systems
  • Lab analysis
  • Full-time, certified operators
  • More dilution, lower max pathogen concentrations
  • Onsite systems
  • Building to district/neighborhood scale
  • Located near point of generation
  • Limited monitoring/staffing; automated operation
  • Smaller population  higher potential max pathogen

concentrations

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Propose d Re g ula tory De line a tion

  • Centralized systems
  • Proposed definition:
  • A system that is a domestic wastewater treatment works or receives for

further treatment wastewater from a domestic wastewater treatment

  • works. The system treats the wastewater for the purpose of beneficial

reuse.

  • Onsite systems
  • Proposed definition:
  • A system that collects untreated wastewater generally at a location near

the point of generation before the wastewater enters a publicly owned sewer system. The system treats the wastewater for the purpose of beneficial reuse near the location that generates the waste.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Propose d Re g ula tory De line a tion

  • Centralized systems
  • No change
  • Onsite systems
  • Proposal:
  • That Regulation 84 be modified to define onsite treatment systems.
  • That Regulation 84 specify that CDPHE must create unique treatment

requirements for onsite systems in policy. Page 26 in WB

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Disc ussion

1. What are your general impressions? 2. What is your opinion of a regulatory demarcation between centralized and onsite systems? 3. How do you feel about treatment requirements for onsite systems being specified in policy rather than regulation?

Page 27 in WB

slide-35
SLIDE 35

T

  • pic 3: T
  • be de te r

mine d by stake holde r s

L isa Be utle r, Stante c

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Wor kshop Closing

L isa Be utle r, Stante c

slide-37
SLIDE 37

T ha nk you for your time !

Ple ase re me mb e r to fill o ut and turn in yo ur wo rksho p partic ipatio n e valuatio n fo rms.

Co nta c t I nfo rma tio n:

Damian Higham

Se nio r Pla nne r 303.628.6537 da mia n.hig ha m@ de nve rwa te r.o rg

slide-38
SLIDE 38

E xtra slide s

slide-39
SLIDE 39
  • Approxima te ly 4% of the ~700,000 AF

Y re c yc le d wa te r use d in the sta te is use d for food c rop irrig a tion

  • A simila r a mount is use d for orc ha rds a nd vine ya rds
  • No e vide nc e of outbre a ks a ttributa ble to this use , or of inc re a se d c a se s of

e nte ric dise a se

QMRA: Ca lifo rnia c o nte xt

Drisc o lls.c o m (Mo st US strawb e rrie s c o me fro m Watso nville , CA and are irrig ate d with re c yc le d wate r) QMRA: Annua lize d me dia n risk o f infe c tio n ra ng e s fro m 10-8 to 10-4 ppy (de pe nding o n pa tho g e n) Co mpa re this to e stima te d dia rrhe a l dise a se inc ide nc e fo r a ll a g e s in de ve lo pe d c o untrie s: 0.2 ppy Ba se d o n this a na lysis, the NWRI I AP: 1. Did no t b e lie ve a t the time (2014) tha t CDPHE sho uld de ve lo p a n a c c e pta b le o r to le ra b le risk me tric fo r wa te r re c yc ling c rite ria 2. Co nfirme d c urre nt c rite ria do no t inc re a se pub lic he a lth risk a nd mo difying the sta nda rds will no t impro ve pub lic he a lth

Olivie ri e t a l.. Risk-Ba se d Re vie w o f Ca lifo rnia ’ s Wa te r-Re c yc ling Crite ria fo r Ag ric ultura l I rrig a tio n, J. E

  • nv. E

ng . (2014). Ma the rs, e t a l. (2002). Glo b a l b urde n o f dise a se 2000: Ve rsio n 2 Me tho ds a nd re sults, Wo rld He a lth Org a niza tio n, Ge ne va .

slide-40
SLIDE 40

CA: b a se d o n 1 in 10,000 risk o f infe c tio n fo r fo o d c ro p irrig a tio n Pe r re vie w o f Risk-Ba se d Re vie w o f Ca lifo rnia ’ s Wa te r-Re c yc ling Crite ria fo r Ag ric ultura l Irrig a tio n,

  • J. E
  • nv. E

ng . (2014). Ba se d o n a risk o f 36 NGI (illne ss) pe r 1,000 fo r re c re a tio na l full-b o d y c o nta c t

1 illness ≈ 100 infections

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Robert W. Hite Treatment Facility 130 mgd avg. (220 mgd capacity) Denver Water Recycling Plant 2-10 mgd (seasonal variability) (30 mgd capacity) = small portion of legally reusable supplies

1-10% of total flows

South Platte River