projections of mandelbrot percolations
play

Projections of Mandelbrot percolations Micha Rams 1 Kroly Simon 2 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Projections of Mandelbrot percolations Micha Rams 1 Kroly Simon 2 1 Institute of Mathematics Polish Academy of Sciences Warsaw, Poland http://www.impan.pl/~rams/ 2 Department of Stochastics Institute of Mathematics Technical University of


  1. Projections of Mandelbrot percolations Michał Rams 1 Károly Simon 2 1 Institute of Mathematics Polish Academy of Sciences Warsaw, Poland http://www.impan.pl/~rams/ 2 Department of Stochastics Institute of Mathematics Technical University of Budapest www.math.bme.hu/~simonk 12 December 2012 Hong Kong Michał Rams, Károly Simon (IMPAN, TU Budapest) Projections of Mandelbrot percolations CUHK 1 / 38

  2. Outline History 1 The projections 2 Percolation phenomenon 3 New results 4 The sum of three linear random Cantor sets 5 Michał Rams, Károly Simon (IMPAN, TU Budapest) Projections of Mandelbrot percolations CUHK 2 / 38

  3. All new results are joint with Michal Rams, Warsaw IMPAN Michal visited me last week in Budapest and while we were preparing our joint talk, he got a terrible flu which prevented him from participating in this conference. Michał Rams, Károly Simon (IMPAN, TU Budapest) Projections of Mandelbrot percolations CUHK 3 / 38

  4. Outline History 1 The projections 2 Percolation phenomenon 3 New results 4 The sum of three linear random Cantor sets 5 Michał Rams, Károly Simon (IMPAN, TU Budapest) Projections of Mandelbrot percolations CUHK 4 / 38

  5. Fractal percolation, introduced by Mandelbrot early 1970’s: We partition the unit square into M 2 congruent sub squares each of them are independently retained with probability p and discarded with probability 1 − p . In the squares retained after the previous step we repeat the same process at infinitum. Michał Rams, Károly Simon (IMPAN, TU Budapest) Projections of Mandelbrot percolations CUHK 5 / 38

  6. Fractal percolation, introduced by Mandelbrot early 1970’s: We partition the unit square into M 2 congruent sub squares each of them are independently retained with probability p and discarded with probability 1 − p . In the squares retained after the previous step we repeat the same process at infinitum. Λ 1 Michał Rams, Károly Simon (IMPAN, TU Budapest) Projections of Mandelbrot percolations CUHK 5 / 38

  7. Fractal percolation, introduced by Mandelbrot early 1970’s: We partition the unit square into M 2 congruent sub squares each of them are independently retained with probability p and discarded with probability 1 − p . In the squares retained after the previous step we repeat the same process at infinitum. Λ 2 Michał Rams, Károly Simon (IMPAN, TU Budapest) Projections of Mandelbrot percolations CUHK 5 / 38

  8. Fractal percolation, introduced by Mandelbrot early 1970’s: We partition the unit square into M 2 congruent sub squares each of them are independently retained with probability p and discarded with probability 1 − p . In the squares retained after the previous step we repeat the same process at infinitum. Λ 3 Michał Rams, Károly Simon (IMPAN, TU Budapest) Projections of Mandelbrot percolations CUHK 5 / 38

  9. Let Λ n be the union of the level n retained squares. Then the statistically self-similar set of interest is: ∞ � Λ := Λ n . n = 1 It was proved by Falconer and independently Mauldin, Willims that conditioned on non-extinction: dim H Λ = dim B Λ = log ( M 2 · p ) a.s. log M The expected number of descendants of every square is: M 2 · p . Therefore, if M 2 · p < 1 then Λ = ∅ a.s. Michał Rams, Károly Simon (IMPAN, TU Budapest) Projections of Mandelbrot percolations CUHK 6 / 38

  10. Let Λ n be the union of the level n retained squares. Then the statistically self-similar set of interest is: ∞ � Λ := Λ n . n = 1 It was proved by Falconer and independently Mauldin, Willims that conditioned on non-extinction: dim H Λ = dim B Λ = log ( M 2 · p ) a.s. log M The expected number of descendants of every square is: M 2 · p . Therefore, if M 2 · p < 1 then Λ = ∅ a.s. Michał Rams, Károly Simon (IMPAN, TU Budapest) Projections of Mandelbrot percolations CUHK 6 / 38

  11. Let Λ n be the union of the level n retained squares. Then the statistically self-similar set of interest is: ∞ � Λ := Λ n . n = 1 It was proved by Falconer and independently Mauldin, Willims that conditioned on non-extinction: dim H Λ = dim B Λ = log ( M 2 · p ) a.s. log M The expected number of descendants of every square is: M 2 · p . Therefore, if M 2 · p < 1 then Λ = ∅ a.s. Michał Rams, Károly Simon (IMPAN, TU Budapest) Projections of Mandelbrot percolations CUHK 6 / 38

  12. Let Λ n be the union of the level n retained squares. Then the statistically self-similar set of interest is: ∞ � Λ := Λ n . n = 1 It was proved by Falconer and independently Mauldin, Willims that conditioned on non-extinction: dim H Λ = dim B Λ = log ( M 2 · p ) a.s. log M The expected number of descendants of every square is: M 2 · p . Therefore, if M 2 · p < 1 then Λ = ∅ a.s. Michał Rams, Károly Simon (IMPAN, TU Budapest) Projections of Mandelbrot percolations CUHK 6 / 38

  13. So, we have almost surely: If p ≤ 1 / M 2 then Λ = ∅ . If 1 / M 2 < p < 1 / M then dim H (Λ) < 1 (but Λ � = ∅ with positive probability). If p > 1 M then either (a) Λ = ∅ or (b) dim H (Λ) > 1 . Recall: dim H Λ = dim B Λ = log ( M 2 · p ) a.s. log M Michał Rams, Károly Simon (IMPAN, TU Budapest) Projections of Mandelbrot percolations CUHK 7 / 38

  14. So, we have almost surely: If p ≤ 1 / M 2 then Λ = ∅ . If 1 / M 2 < p < 1 / M then dim H (Λ) < 1 (but Λ � = ∅ with positive probability). If p > 1 M then either (a) Λ = ∅ or (b) dim H (Λ) > 1 . Recall: dim H Λ = dim B Λ = log ( M 2 · p ) a.s. log M Michał Rams, Károly Simon (IMPAN, TU Budapest) Projections of Mandelbrot percolations CUHK 7 / 38

  15. So, we have almost surely: If p ≤ 1 / M 2 then Λ = ∅ . If 1 / M 2 < p < 1 / M then dim H (Λ) < 1 (but Λ � = ∅ with positive probability). If p > 1 M then either (a) Λ = ∅ or (b) dim H (Λ) > 1 . Recall: dim H Λ = dim B Λ = log ( M 2 · p ) a.s. log M Michał Rams, Károly Simon (IMPAN, TU Budapest) Projections of Mandelbrot percolations CUHK 7 / 38

  16. So, we have almost surely: If p ≤ 1 / M 2 then Λ = ∅ . If 1 / M 2 < p < 1 / M then dim H (Λ) < 1 (but Λ � = ∅ with positive probability). If p > 1 M then either (a) Λ = ∅ or (b) dim H (Λ) > 1 . Recall: dim H Λ = dim B Λ = log ( M 2 · p ) a.s. log M Michał Rams, Károly Simon (IMPAN, TU Budapest) Projections of Mandelbrot percolations CUHK 7 / 38

  17. So, we have almost surely: If p ≤ 1 / M 2 then Λ = ∅ . If 1 / M 2 < p < 1 / M then dim H (Λ) < 1 (but Λ � = ∅ with positive probability). If p > 1 M then either (a) Λ = ∅ or (b) dim H (Λ) > 1 . Recall: dim H Λ = dim B Λ = log ( M 2 · p ) a.s. log M Michał Rams, Károly Simon (IMPAN, TU Budapest) Projections of Mandelbrot percolations CUHK 7 / 38

  18. So, we have almost surely: If p ≤ 1 / M 2 then Λ = ∅ . If 1 / M 2 < p < 1 / M then dim H (Λ) < 1 (but Λ � = ∅ with positive probability). If p > 1 M then either (a) Λ = ∅ or (b) dim H (Λ) > 1 . Recall: dim H Λ = dim B Λ = log ( M 2 · p ) a.s. log M Michał Rams, Károly Simon (IMPAN, TU Budapest) Projections of Mandelbrot percolations CUHK 7 / 38

  19. So, we have almost surely: If p ≤ 1 / M 2 then Λ = ∅ . If 1 / M 2 < p < 1 / M then dim H (Λ) < 1 (but Λ � = ∅ with positive probability). If p > 1 M then either (a) Λ = ∅ or (b) dim H (Λ) > 1 . Recall: dim H Λ = dim B Λ = log ( M 2 · p ) a.s. log M Michał Rams, Károly Simon (IMPAN, TU Budapest) Projections of Mandelbrot percolations CUHK 7 / 38

  20. Marstrand Theorem Theorem (Marstrand) Let B ⊂ R 2 be a Borel set. If dim H ( B ) ≤ 1 then for L eb -a.e. θ , we have 1 dim H ( proj θ ( B )) = dim H ( B ) If dim H ( B ) > 1 then for L eb -a.e. θ , we have 2 L eb ( proj θ ( B )) > 0 . Michał Rams, Károly Simon (IMPAN, TU Budapest) Projections of Mandelbrot percolations CUHK 8 / 38

  21. Marstrand Theorem Theorem (Marstrand) Let B ⊂ R 2 be a Borel set. If dim H ( B ) ≤ 1 then for L eb -a.e. θ , we have 1 dim H ( proj θ ( B )) = dim H ( B ) If dim H ( B ) > 1 then for L eb -a.e. θ , we have 2 L eb ( proj θ ( B )) > 0 . Michał Rams, Károly Simon (IMPAN, TU Budapest) Projections of Mandelbrot percolations CUHK 8 / 38

  22. Marstrand Theorem Theorem (Marstrand) Let B ⊂ R 2 be a Borel set. If dim H ( B ) ≤ 1 then for L eb -a.e. θ , we have 1 dim H ( proj θ ( B )) = dim H ( B ) If dim H ( B ) > 1 then for L eb -a.e. θ , we have 2 L eb ( proj θ ( B )) > 0 . Michał Rams, Károly Simon (IMPAN, TU Budapest) Projections of Mandelbrot percolations CUHK 8 / 38

  23. Outline History 1 The projections 2 Percolation phenomenon 3 New results 4 The sum of three linear random Cantor sets 5 Michał Rams, Károly Simon (IMPAN, TU Budapest) Projections of Mandelbrot percolations CUHK 9 / 38

  24. Orthogonal projection to ℓ θ Λ p r o j θ ( Λ ) θ ℓ θ Michał Rams, Károly Simon (IMPAN, TU Budapest) Projections of Mandelbrot percolations CUHK 10 / 38

  25. Radial and co-radial projections with center t C 1 Λ t Proj t (Λ) Let CProj t (Λ) := { dist ( t , x ) : x ∈ Λ } ( CProj t (Λ) is the set of the length of dashed lines above). Michał Rams, Károly Simon (IMPAN, TU Budapest) Projections of Mandelbrot percolations CUHK 11 / 38

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend