Project WE: Wellness Enhancement Partnering and EngagementWere in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

project we wellness enhancement partnering and engagement
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Project WE: Wellness Enhancement Partnering and EngagementWere in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Project WE: Wellness Enhancement Partnering and EngagementWere in this Together Chyrell D Bellamy, PhD, MSW Associate Professor, Director of Peer Services & Research chyrell.bellamy@yale.edu November 1, 2018 #PCORI2018 Chyrell


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Project WE: Wellness Enhancement Partnering and Engagement…We’re in this Together

Chyrell D Bellamy, PhD, MSW

Associate Professor, Director of Peer Services & Research chyrell.bellamy@yale.edu November 1, 2018

#PCORI2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2 • November 1, 2018

Chyrell Bellamy

  • Has nothing to disclose.

yale program for recovery and community health

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3 • November 1, 2018

Objectives

At the conclusion of this activity, participants should be able to

  • Objective 1: Identify ways to foster relationships and engage

community in research activities

  • Objective 2: Learn ways that partnership works
  • Objective 3: Describe ways partnership enhanced research
slide-4
SLIDE 4

4 • November 1, 2018

Starting with the Why?

  • People with Serious Mental Illness are dying 25 years earlier than

the rest of society1

1 National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors Medical Directors Council, (2006). Morbidity

and Mortality in People with Serious Mental Illness

  • Can we collectively figure out a way to do something about it?
slide-5
SLIDE 5

5 • November 1, 2018

Increasing Health Care Choices and Improving Health Outcomes Among Persons with Serious Mental Illness

Overall aims of the PCORI funded study:

  • Used mixed methods to determine which patients choose to use which services and what are the short

and longer-term outcomes for patients in Wellness Center (co-located primary care) (N=786).

  • Based on participant interviews, identified barriers to and facilitators of access, service use, and

improvements in person-centered outcomes and elicited suggestions for changes and additional interventions to improve health of people with mental illness.

  • With persons in recovery developed and piloted a new peer-led community-based intervention in

enhancing access and choice, and improving person-centered health outcomes, among 37 clients who reported no improvement in their health as a result of their use of the Wellness Center during the first year of the project. Today we will discuss lessons learned from our patient engagement and participatory research.

slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7

7 • November 1, 2018

The Importance of Patient Engagement

  • Patient/client/stakeholder involvement in research dates back to the 1980s in the medical field -

maternal health, cancer, and HIV – particularly in early 90s.

  • Pervasive fears and skepticism in parts of the research community
  • “Patients should not interfere in processes which they know nothing about”1
  • Requires time, patience, and guidance, particularly at the outset2
  • Despite these challenges, the evidence from this country and around the world suggest that many

benefits await such an endeavor.

  • Evidence shows overall positive effect on services and benefits for the service users2
  • Benefits include3
  • facilitating empowerment
  • enhancing relevance
  • generating novel research

1 Caron-Flinterman, Broerse, & Bunders, 2005, p. 2576; 2 Palmer et al., 2009; 3 Beresford, 2007; Involve review

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8 • November 1, 2018

Patient Engagement in the Project

  • 3 Patients were co-researchers, hired as full or part time (with benefits)

Yale Research Assistants

  • 2 Patient stakeholders on Research Team, participated in the bi-weekly

research meetings (received stipends)

  • 6 Patients were on the Advisory Committee (met 4-6+ times per year)
  • 5 research staff (in addition to the above) also self-disclose as “patients”
  • 1 CMHC/Wellness Center Stakeholder served as a primary stakeholder on

the research team

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9 • November 1, 2018

Partnering Examples

  • Patient partners convened advisory board and provided training on

leadership and board participation.

  • Stated they were not looking for people to be tokens
  • Advisory members participated in conducting research – shadowed

qualitative interviews and assisted in analysis.

  • Patient partners were co-researchers
  • Involved throughout research
  • Co-developed an intervention based on input from patients in the study
  • Conducted meet and greet to engage participants in the intervention

component of the study

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10 • November 1, 2018

The WE Harambee Intervention

  • Based on the 8 dimensions of Wellness
slide-11
SLIDE 11

11 • November 1, 2018

Findings: Harambee Intervention

Compared to the control group, certain outcomes for participants in the Harambee intervention significantly improved:

  • 1. Decreased number of visits to the emergency department for

psychiatric/substance abuse reasons in the past 30 days

  • 2. Decreased alcohol use
  • 3. Increased overall wellness across the 8 dimensions
slide-12
SLIDE 12

12 • November 1, 2018

Findings (cont’d)

Compared to the control group, certain outcomes for participants in the Harambee intervention significantly improved:

  • How much participants felt they had input into their treatment

plan increased

  • Whether they would choose their current outpatient care if it

were free increased

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13 • November 1, 2018

Discussion: Implementation and Next Steps

  • Co-location and evidence based practices alone did not show significant

improvement in health indicators.

  • However, more time is needed to be able to assess whether changes

would occur over time.

  • A community-based peer-led holistic health intervention based on the 8

dimensions of wellness, social determinants and structural competency has promise as an augmented service for people with mental illness that may not be improving on health and social indicators.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14 • November 1, 2018

Discussion (cont’d)

  • Future research is needed to further test the target mechanisms of this

intervention and its effectiveness over time.

  • Involvement of patients as co-researchers benefited all aspects of the

research process. Patients involved in this research project were able to enhance the team’s capacity by

  • selecting relevant patient outcome measures
  • recruiting patients to projects
  • co-developing interventions
  • collecting, analyzing, disseminating and reporting on data
slide-15
SLIDE 15

15 • November 1, 2018

Learn More

  • www.pcori.org
  • info@pcori.org
  • #PCORI2018
slide-16
SLIDE 16

16 • November 1, 2018

Thank You!

Chyrell D Bellamy, PhD, MSW

Associate Professor chyrell.Bellamy@yale.edu November 1, 2018