[PPT] - Project Managers Assessment Overall performance for the Tank PowerPoint Presentation

SLIDE 1

SLIDE 2

Overall performance for the Tank Operations Contract (TOC) is favorable with a cumulative-to-date cost performance index (CPI) of 1.01 and schedule performance index (SPI) of 0.99. The FY 2018 CPI is 1.00 with the FY SPI at 0.95. U.S. Judge Thomas Rice has approved the request for a trial delay in the Hanford chemical vapors lawsuit, moving the trial date from August 29, 2018, to November 26, 2018. The delay of about three months was requested by plaintiffs and defendants in the lawsuit to give them more time to work toward a settlement. Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System General: In the first quarter of FY 2018, on October 23, 2017, the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an optimized LAWPS facility that would deviate significantly from the previous LAWPS design. As a result, progress on the previous design was slowed last period, and on November 20, 2017, a Stop Work Order was issued to the Architect Engineer (A/E) directing them to cease work on all previous design in accordance with Letter 17-TF-0096 – CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 – Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, received from U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) on November 16, 2017. WRPS worked with ORP and the A/E to stop the work in a prudent manner with significant design details being considered. This process required significant time to ensure it was communicated effectively, thus the associated costs continued until the official notice was delivered and will be discussed in the detailed variance analysis reports. During this period WRPS worked with the Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) and the A/E on optimizing the design strategy scope, schedule and estimates. This work is

n-going into January 2018 when the optimized detail plan is expected to be issued.

Design: Design changes are currently being planned and a detailed plan is expected to be issued in February 2018. Permitting: The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Package #1 of 3 was submitted to ORP for review and submission to the State of Washington, Department of Ecology (Ecolgy) in June, on schedule. Follow-on public review meetings have been conducted. Significant changes discussed above in the “General” section will impact future permitting efforts. Integrated Testing: Significant changes discussed above in the “General” section impact the overall testing strategy and changes are being planned. New testing requirements will be determined when the system specification/design is more mature. The last test for the Integrated Scale Test started, and WRPS is de-scoping the Cross Flow Filter (CFF) Foulant Testing. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) is completing the remaining carryover testing scope from FY17, which consists of writing the reports. Procurement (Long Lead Equipment): With the change in design strategy, WRPS is currently suspending design of the LLE and, as needed, will issue a formal change

f direction to the various subcontractors when the system specification/design is more mature. The Bridge Crane 90% design package was received in December.

Procurement has been cancelled and updated the POP to January to ensure no additional charges. Xomox valves are planned to be suspended then turned on later with a new release for the new design. ASME Tanks are planned to be terminated for convenience. AECOM design of the CFF and IX has stopped, the current plan is to issue a formal stop work notice and open new releases when needed. Construction: WRPS is working on drafting Request For Proposals (RFPs) for the Waste Transfer Line removal scope. The revised Site Preparation RFP will be a future effort. Key Upcoming Activities: WRPS’s main focus is working with the A/E to detail plan the design change schedule. The detail plan from the A/E will supplement the WRPS cost and schedule proposal to DOE as part of the CP-18-007 submittal in March 2018. December 2017 2

Project Manager’s Assessment

SLIDE 3

3

Project Manager’s Assessment (cont.)

SST Retrieval C-105 Retrieval Operations: Development of the engineering Retrieval Completion Report for C-105 remains on track for January 2018 completion. The C-105 in- tank Camera/CAD Modeling System video activity is on track for completion in late January 2018. The videos will be used to calculate the certified residual waste volume in C-105 and support development of the post-retrieval Tank Sampling and Analysis Plan. Hose-in-Hose Transfer Line (HIHTL) Removals: Crews continued placement of steel cover plates over installed HIHTL between the splitter box POR-497 exhauster and the mid-point to diversion box POR-412 exhauster. The majority of shield plates and hose barns have been removed from HIHTL transfer routes between the C- Farm POR138 exhauster valve box and double shell tank (DST) AN-101, and between the C-Farm POR104 exhauster valve box and DST AN-106. Removal of HIHTL shield plates and hose barns between the POR104 valve box and the AN06A valve pit were completed. The hose removals were scheduled for C- Farm POR138 valve box and DST AN-101. With the exception of maintaining the backbone for the C-Farm high resistance lead detection monitoring system, no

ther equipment has been identified as being needed for future retrieval of these tanks. Closure evaluations remain ongoing.

Excavation was completed at A/AX and HIHTL installed to approximately midpoint between the POR-497 AX spiller box and the POR-412 diversion box. Cleanout of the AX-103 pit C was completed, as well as the demobilization from the SX-102 pit A riser 5A pump removal. The contract for the construction of a new AN Farm Bottle Handling Tent was awarded. The tent is required to support large HIHTL work crews in AN-Farm beginning late spring 2018. AY-102: Engineering continued to identify pre-requisite actions and preventative maintenance (PM) to return the AY-102 annulus exhauster to service. Weekly schedule updates will include engineering actions required to return PMs to active status and, status of released PM work packages ready for work. ORP completed an internal review of the AY-102 Leak Inspection Report and initiated external release approvals. The SA II.B.5.(c) AY-102 Leak Inspection Report was transmitted to the Washington State Department of Ecology by the end of December in accordance with the PCHB No. 14-041c Settlement Agreement. The project continued to develop scope and schedules for input to the project proposal for remaining Phase 3 and Phase 4 activities. The proposal scope will include disposition of tank annulus liquid waste, tank layup, isolation of the DST-to-DST transfer line in AY-102A pit and initiation of regulatory negotiations to establish closure configuration of the tank. Actions to estimate resources required to deploy the alternative to the Annulus Pumping System Modification were on hold pending contract direction. WRPS submitted the change proposal for the Design and Fabrication of the Annulus Emergency Pumping Capability on December 19, 2017. AX Farm Equipment Removal: Demobilization was completed from cleanout of AX-103 pit C. Crews completed the AX-102 pit A riser 5B pump removal and commenced demobilization activities. Completed removal of the AX-104 pit C riser 1A sluicer and commenced demobilization activities. Crews continued cleanout activities at AX-101 pit B. A-Farm Ventilation: Crews continued preparations for placement of A-Farm exhauster pad, including completion of engineering design. The engineering design for A-Farm equipment removal and waste retrieval system installation is on-going. The fabrication of a mock-up for duct isolation of A-Farm ventilation has commenced. December 2017

SLIDE 4

4

Project Manager’s Assessment (cont.)

Tank Farm Projects SX Interim Barrier Construction: Installation of the evapotranspiration basin liner at SX Farm was completed, and the anchor trench backfill began. The subcontractor recommenced work after the holiday to install the basin drainage system. The SX Interim Barrier Phase II (North and South) scope has been released for bid by WRPS to the subcontractor community. The north and south barrier installation proposals are due from the subcontractors in mid-January 2018. Single Shell Tank Integrity Visual Inspections: Visual inspections were completed at Tanks TX-106, TX-105, TX-118, TX-109 and SX-101 were completed. For FY 2018, 6 of 12 planned visual inspections have been completed. Water Service Upgrade: Crews completed removal of the existing equipment at AP-801 service water. Installation of new equipment including flow meter, flow totalizer, reduction valving and new piping run began. The new equipment installation will increase the efficiency of waste transfers, reduce operator errors, and mitigate pressure transients. Comprehensive Vapors Action Plan Full-face air-purifying respirators: WRPS and the Hanford Atomic Metal Trades Council (HAMTC) have jointly agreed to allow use of full-face air-purifying respirators (FFAPRs) in Hanford’s SY Farm for specific work evolutions, and workers began accessing the farm wearing FFAPRs. The decision is consistent with the Memorandum

f Agreement (MOA) for use of respiratory protection between WRPS and HAMTC issued in August 2016. The use of FFAPR in SY Farm will be authorized for specific

work scope during non-waste-disturbing activities. Workers will continue to have the option to use Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus or other available supplied- air systems if they choose, so long as the equipment does not produce additional safety hazards. Air-Purifying Respirators: Consistent with the August 2016 MOA between WRPS and HAMTC, the use of supplied air has been made mandatory for work inside the tank farms until two conditions have been met:

1. Cartridge testing is completed and documented results have been satisfactorily demonstrated to provide worker protection from tank vapor emissions.
2. A third-party qualified independent entity, selected by HAMTC, reviews the testing methodology/protocols and results of the cartridge testing data and concurs

with the results. With completion of the above conditions, conducted on a farm-by-farm basis, those respiratory cartridges that were proven effective in protecting against tank vapors and gases may be available to workers for use inside the farm. Cartridge testing for FY 2018 is slated to begin in January/February of 2018. Vapor Monitoring and Detection System (VMDS): Efforts continued on the modification of the Autosampler. In support of developing test gas standards, samples were collected during a recent waste disturbing activity at AP Farm. The samples will be analyzed by both the 222-S Lab and an off-site vendor in order to confirm the sample adequately supports integrated testing. Additional samples will be collected from the same area at AP Farm to determine the inactive or dormant

conditions. Other activities include the preparation of the test plan and procurement of the equipment (probes, pumps, UV-DOAS) needed to support integrated

testing of the Autosampler. In parallel with these activities, design drawings for the test bed manifold and Hanford E-Skid were being prepared. December 2017

SLIDE 5

5

Project Manager’s Assessment (cont.)

Personal Vapor Monitor: November saw the successful completion of the integrated field test, including testing of the prototype readers and sensor chip, at the R. J. Lee facility. C2Sense and WRPS completed review and comment resolution of the technical report summarizing the test activities. A notable omission from the final report was the conversion of raw conductance data from the sensor material to ammonia concentration values. C2Sense intends to develop the algorithms necessary to perform this function during the FY 2018 field test in the tank farms. Prototype units were shipped to WRPS as a final deliverable of the existing

contract. These prototype units will be used to support the FY 2018 field test at tank farms.

Strobic Air Dilution Fan: In late November, a contract was awarded to Strobic to support factory acceptance testing (FAT), and Strobic began fabricating equipment. The FAT is currently scheduled to be performed at Strobic’s facility in March 2018. In addition, the test plan statement-of-work, which will be used to support integrated testing in late spring/early summer 2018, was approved. AW Stack Extension: he 60% design package was issued for review and comments were submitted. The majority of the comments were resolved, and the design is

n-track to be issued for review in January. A contract was awarded to Terragraphics for dispersion modeling support. The scope of the contract is to identify the

dispersion (or plume effects) from the stack’s current elevation of 27 feet to its new elevation of 60 feet. Production Operations Production Operations engineering continued to restore preventive maintenance work packages to active status for the AY-102 Annulus Exhauster. An update to the technical evaluation of the maximum airflow humidity given new initial conditions in the AY-102 primary and annulus tank spaces was initiated. This update will establish procedure-operating temperatures required to maintain percent humidity within allowed values. Crews also performed AY-102 annulus video inspections at risers 77 and 79 as part of bi-monthly 95% inspection, and completed cleanup and disposal of various low level waste from AW Farm and the 242A Evaporator. Engineering Process and Control System (P&CS) engineers:

Updated the Tank Farm Monitoring and Control System (TFMCS) to support Phase 2 Pilot Scale Testing. The software change integrated the sensors, which

remained after the down select process into the overall TFMCS graphics and login environment. These sensors and their associated alarms will continue to be monitored by Production Operations during the Phase 2 Pilot Scale test.

Completed creation of new data historian (PI) tags as part of the down-select design associated with the VMDS, and completed setting up an improved test

infrastructure for the OSISoft PI system. December 2017

SLIDE 6

6

Project Manager’s Assessment (cont.)

Additional December 2017 Items of Note

The Tank Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) Demonstration integrated project team was established as part of the One System Chief Technology Office, and the initial

requirements definition and site layouts are progressing well. The design philosophy for the TSCR is based on commercial nuclear cleanup systems deployed at Fukushima and on the similar Tank Closure Cesium Removal system (TCCR) planned for deployment at the Savanah River Site for cesium removal from Tank 10H. The TSCR will be located in the AP Tank Farm and provide the ability to process waste through a tank side ion exchange module and support the requirements for WTP-LAW Start-Up in advance of the revised ‘Optimized’ LAWPS operation.

ORP issued a letter directing WRPS to initiate a contact-handled transuranic waste (CH-TRU) Demonstration Planning effort. The request was for work to be

planned and executed in FY 2018. The scope includes supporting an acceleration of CH-TRU disposition and evaluation of options and strategy development of the project. A proposal kick-off meeting was held on December 6, 2017. The proposal is due by February 4, 2018. December 2017

SLIDE 7

7

Safety Statistics

Through December 2017, WRPS Tank Operations Contract had worked 254,812 hours (18 days) without a Lost Time Workday Injury, and 254,812 hours (18 days) since the last Recordable case. There was one Recordable/Lost Time Workday case in December.

Total Recordable FY 2018 Cumulative Summary

Integrated Safety Management System The Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 cumulative performance indicators for Recordable cases (0.31) and DART cases (0.15) surpassed the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management (DOE-EM) goals of 1.10 and 0.60, respectively. Additionally, the 12-month rolling average safety rates remained low, with a rate of 0.20 for Recordable cases and 0.08 for DART cases.

* Score Based on FY 2018 Cumulative Case Rate

* *

Days Away, Restricted Workdays or Transferred (DART) FY 2018 Cumulative Summary December 2017

SLIDE 8

8

Safety Statistics (cont.)

Total Recordable 12 Month Rolling Average Summary Days Away, Restricted Workdays or Transferred (DART) 12 Month Rolling Average Summary First Aid Case Rate - 12 Month Rolling Average Summary

One Recordable/Lost Work Day case in December:

Employee was driving and was struck by another vehicle causing injury to back.

Thirteen First Aid cases in December:

Employee’s hand was caught between a storage rack and bottle when putting SCBA bottle

into the storage rods causing contusion.

When getting into work truck employee slipped on running board causing pain to knee.
Employee hit shin on cable reel causing pain.
Employee experienced eye irritation due to smell at MO-588.
Employee was reaching for SCBA rack and felt pop in finger.
Four employees reported headache due to smell at MO-588.
Employee was struck in the head by a SCBA rack.
Employee lost balance and struck leg on light plant causing strain to leg.
While crawling underneath the trailer employee felt pain in the knees.
Employee slipped on ice that was covered in snow causing strain to hand.

December 2017

SLIDE 9

$261.6 $430.4 $471.0 $362.0 $366.6 $409.9 $523.7 $621.6 $634.9 $97.6 $60.6 $86.7 $612.0

$17.9 $28.0 $32.9 $23.5 $19.0 $21.6 $28.3 $38.0 $48.2 $54.4

$- $100.0 $200.0 $300.0 $400.0 $500.0 $600.0 $700.0 $800.0 $900.0 $1,000.0

$ Millions

FY 2009-2017 Actuals Carryover from FY 2017 LAWPS Carryover LAWPS Capital Projected FY 2018 Expense PMB Fee

Projected Expense PMB funding for FY 2018 is $612.0M. The projected funding for LAWPS in FY 2018 is $86.7M. The fee pool for FY 2018 is $54.4M. The FY 2017 Carryover is $97.6M. There is $60.6M in LAWPS Carryover, for a total of $914.2M

9

PMB Funds Analysis by Year

December 2017

SLIDE 10

10

FY 2017 Performance Based Incentive Profile

December 2017

SLIDE 11

11

Not-to-Exceed (NTE) Tracking Report

December 2017

SLIDE 12

12

NTE Tracking Report (cont.)

December 2017

SLIDE 13

13

NTE Tracking Report (cont.)

December 2017

SLIDE 14

14

NTE Tracking Report (cont.)

December 2017

SLIDE 15

15

NTE Tracking Report (cont.)

December 2017

SLIDE 16

16

Change Proposal Summary

December 2017

SLIDE 17

17

Expense SV/CV Forecast Projections

December 2017

SLIDE 18

18

Capital SV/CV Forecast Projections

December 2017

SLIDE 19

19

Small Business Reporting

Through December 2017, WRPS has awarded a total of $1,681M in subcontracts, of which $1,100M (65.5%) CTD is attributed to small businesses. The CTD awards to small businesses exceeds the 58.2% small business subcontracting goal. WRPS will continue to promote small business subcontracting by setting aside procurement actions for small businesses when appropriate, as well as by reaching out to new small businesses in furtherance of this objective. In December of 2017, WRPS did 77.91% with small business only and the total small business award was 88.25%. In order to improve our area of Disadvantaged & Veteran – Owned small business, the SBPM has been utilizing SAM.GOV and the Small Business Dynamic Search with solicitations/EOI to reach out to businesses who fall into those socio-economic categories to look at our solicitations and sending them items to bid on. In December 2017, the Small Business Program Manager attended a number of outreach events in the community to continue to search and network with the small businesses in the Tri-Cities community. The SBPM is continuing to work with the Chamber to help plan the Women in Business Conference set for January 31, 2018 as the SBPM will be speaking at the event. The next Hanford Small Business Council meetings are continuing again this month, after taking a holiday break in the month of December. The SBPM is also looking at getting more small businesses that focus on construction by hosting a “mini” Meet the Buyer in the next upcoming months. The Small Business Council is also continuing to plan Bridging Partnerships which is being held in April 2018 at the Three Rivers Convention Center in Kennewick, WA.

December 2017

SLIDE 20

20

Baseline Change Requests

December 2017

SLIDE 21

21

Risk Management Assessment

Management of TOC risks continued in December 2017. TOC key risks cross cutting the various programs and projects are identified below along with their associated ongoing/ planned handling actions, status of the handling actions, any emergent quality issues, staffing, alternative courses of action or other problems that may impact the baseline scope. During the month of November, WRPS maintained 34+ active risk registers.

December 2017

SLIDE 22

22

Risk Management Assessment (cont.)

December 2017

SLIDE 23

23

Risk Management Assessment (cont.)

December 2017

SLIDE 24

24

Risk Management Assessment (cont.)

December 2017

SLIDE 25

25

Risk Management Assessment (cont.)

December 2017

SLIDE 26

26

Risk Management Assessment (cont.)

December 2017

SLIDE 27

27

Risk Management Assessment (cont.)

December 2017

SLIDE 28

28

Government Furnished Services and Information (GFS/I)

December 2017

SLIDE 29

Tank Farm Projects December 2017

SX FARM EVAPOTRANSPIRATION BASIN

Welding seams in SX Evapotranspiration Basin Trenching for 18” drainage piping 18” drainage piping

SLIDE 30

30

Tank Farm Projects Safety

12 Month Rolling Wave

December 2017

As of December 31, 2017 Tank Farm Projects has worked 1,402,394 hours or 1,376 days without a Lost Time Workday Injury And Has worked 584 days since a Recordable case. Work Related Injuries during December Eight first aid cases

Four Headaches due to smell at M0-588
One eye irritation due to smell M0-588
One finger reaching for SCBA
One shin hit on cable reel
One knee when slipped on running board of vehicle

SLIDE 31

31

Tank Farm Projects Key Deliverables Status

December 2017

FY2018 Key Deliverables

Target Forecast 242-A Integrity Assessment- Leak Test and IQRPE Assessment Report for DOE-ORP (WAC 173-303 Recommendation) Report submitted SEP17 DEC17A Complete 90% design for AP-105 DFLAW upgrades On schedule for review mid-January DEC17 JAN18 Complete 242-A Process Condensate Station Work package planning complete; awaiting LOTO to begin field installation mid-January. DEC17 FEB18 Continuous Air Monitor Upgrades - Issue Report Incorporating comments from first WRPS review FEB18 FEB18 AP801 Water Service Upgrade - Complete field installation of new equipment Existing equipment removed; final mechanical measurements taken for fabrications FEB18 FEB18 Complete twelve SST Integrity visual inspections SX and TX Farm visual inspections completed to date. December January FEB18 FEB18 Complete field work supporting ETF Integrity Assessment Schedule field testing per facility availability MAR18 MAR18 DST Improvement Plan - Procure robotic crawlers (2) Received from Adaptive Energy December; Kurion completed fabrication; testing during February FEB18 FEB18 242-A Reboiler - complete fabrication and deliver Fabrication ongoing; IQRPE witnessed welding girth seams MAR18 APR18 Complete field work supporting 219-S Integrity Assessment Work package planning for leak testing MAY18 MAY18 Simulant Valve Testing - completion of 1,500 cycle & Leak Testing all valves McCanna valves testing complete; revise valve assembly procedure/obtain vendor approval MAY18 JUN18 Complete permanent power installation to 6241-V in support of Crossite Transfer line Reactivation Temporary power ECN completed, breakers and generator received JUN18 JUN18 Complete nine DST Annulus visual inspections Work package planning completed AW Farm; ready to commence after completion of SST videos. JUN18 JUN18 Perform NACE and/or encasement pressure checks at three pits. Testing valve on Supernate Transfer Line - SNL-5350 before Encasement pressure check round 2 JUL18 AUG18 Leak Detector Relay Replacement Installation complete Developing design media for wireless transmitter installation ECN AUG18 AUG18

SLIDE 32

32

Tank Farm Projects DNFSB/TPA/Consent Decree Milestones

December 2017

Tank Farm Projects DNFSB Recommendation 2012-2 Implementation Plan (IP) Deliverables Submittal Date (WRPS) Completion Date (ORP) Due Date Total Float (ORP)

Active Projects

Action 2-2 Install SS instrumentation for real-time monitoring of the ventilation exhaust flow from each DST. 26-Mar-18 23-Apr-18* 31-Mar-18

13

Action 2-3 Approve the safety basis amendment revising the flammable gas controls to use SS real-time flow monitoring instrumentation. 5-Sep-18 15-Oct-18* 30-Sep-18

9

Action 2-4 Implement a safety basis amendment revising the flammable gas controls to use SS real-time monitoring. 15-Oct-18 12-Nov-18* 31-Dec-18 25 Action 3-1 Provide SS annulus level detectors in each of the DST annuli where the flammable gas hazard exists 25-Jul-18 25-Jul-18* 31-Dec-17

115

Tri-Party Agreement Milestones Submittal Date (WRPS) Completion Date (ORP) Due Date Total Float (ORP)

Active Projects

M-045-91E2 Provide SST Farms Dome Deflection Survey Report Every Two Years 8/28/2017 (completed) 9/20/2017 (completed) 9/20/2017 (completed) M-045-91I SST Integrity Assessment Completion Report 31-Aug-18 21-Sep-18 30-Sep-18 18 Consent Decree Milestones Submittal Date (WRPS) Completion Date (ORP) Due Date Total Float (ORP)

Active Projects

2:08-CV-5085-RMP 242-A Spare Reboiler Fabrication Contract Award 11/14/2016 (Completed) 11/14/2016 (Completed) 11/14/2016 (Completed) 2:08-CV-5085-RMP 242-A Spare Reboiler Receipt 10-Apr-18 10-Apr-18 31-Dec-18 120 WAC Recommendations Submittal Date (WRPS) Completion Date (ORP) Due Date Total Float

Active Projects

WAC 173-303 242-A Integrity Assessment Completion Milestone 12/21/2017 (Completed) N/A 12/21/2017 (Completed) ETF Integrity Assessment - Rev. 1 Review ETF Integrity Assessment Program Plan Completion 27-Sep-18 N/A 30-Sep-18

ORP Letter (Estars 2017-1291) to Chairman Sullivan requests change of Action 3-1 milestone to 30-Sep-18. WRPS will prepare Baseline Change Request for next reporting period.

SLIDE 33

33

Tank Farm Projects FY18 PBI Milestones

December 2017

PBI Title Terminal Dates Analyst POC % of Fee Total Available Fee Fieldwork Completion 01/15/18 Change 1 wk (FES) PBI Completion 01/15/18 Total Float per Terminal Date % Probability

f completion

by 09/30/18 Complete Grab Sample #1 in support of Tank Operations Contract (TOC) mission - AP-107 large sample 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Stoner, Ryan 1.1% $75,000 23-Oct-17A 1 31-Oct-17A 228 100% Complete Grab Sample #2 in support of Tank Operations Contract (TOC) mission - AP-107 chemistry grab 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Stoner, Ryan 1.1% $75,000 13-Nov-17 A 30-Nov-17 A 208 100% Complete Grab Sample #3 in support of Tank Operations Contract (TOC) mission 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Stoner, Ryan 1.1% $75,000 29-Nov-17A 20-Dec-17A 190 100% Complete Grab Sample #4 in support of Tank Operations Contract (TOC) mission 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Stoner, Ryan 1.1% $75,000 16-Dec-17a 20-Dec-17A 178 100% Complete Grab Sample #5 in support of Tank Operations Contract (TOC) mission 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Stoner, Ryan 1.1% $75,000 23-Mar-18

5

2-Apr-18 125 80% Complete Grab Sample #6 in support of Tank Operations Contract (TOC) mission 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Stoner, Ryan 1.1% $75,000 30-Mar-18

5

9-Apr-18 120 80% Complete Grab Sample #7 in support of Tank Operations Contract (TOC) mission 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Stoner, Ryan 1.1% $75,000 11-May-18

5

21-May-18 90 80% Complete Grab Sample #8 in support of Tank Operations Contract (TOC) mission 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Stoner, Ryan 1.1% $75,000 25-Jun-18

5

3-Jul-18 60 80% Complete robot crawler demonstration through field deployment in one DST 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Castleberry, Jim 1.5% $100,000 28-Aug-18 5-Sep-18 13 80% Perform Ultrasonic testing examination of DST AY-101 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Castleberry, Jim 1.5% $100,000 02-May-18

6

10-May-18 77 80% Perform Ultrasonic testing examination of DST AZ-101 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Castleberry, Jim 1.5% $100,000 09-Jul-18 17-Jul-18 52 80% Perform Ultrasonic testing examination of DST AP-107 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Castleberry, Jim 1.5% $100,000 13-Aug-18 21-Aug-18 27 80% Complete design, fabrication, and testing of an annulus pumping system capable of deployment in anyone of the 27 double-shell tanks 30-Sep-18 Hui, Justin May, Dustin 4.5% $300,000 21-Aug-18

4

29-Aug-18 16 80% Complete HVAC Control room upgrade (Complete the removal and replacement of the 242‑A Evaporator Control Room HVAC system) 30-Sep-18 Wright, Bryan Stoner, Tyler 4.2% $275,000 13-Feb-18 21-Feb-18 122 80% Complete 242-A Evaporator Fire alarm panel upgrade 30-Sep-18 Powers, Katie Stoner, Tyler 4.2% $275,000 13-Jun-18 20-Jun-18 55 80% Complete installation of in-pit heaters in ten (10) pits 30-Sep-18 Powers, Katie Nelson, Bobby 4.4% $292,000 25-Sep-18 27-Sep-18 80% Complete AZ-102 pump replacement 30-Sep-18 Hui, Justin May, Dustin 4.4% $292,000 10-May-18* 14-May-18 139 80% Complete AW-103 pump replacement 30-Sep-18 Hui, Justin May, Dustin 4.4% $292,000 19-Sep-18* 23-Sep-18 7 80% Complete wireless instrumentation installation in nine (9) pits 30-Sep-18 Powers, Katie Larsen, Doug 4.4% $292,000 18-Sep-18 27-Sep-18 80% Complete electrical upgrades to AW-103 and AW-104 to support 242-A Evaporator campaigns and transfers from 241-AW-3 and 241-AW-4 30-Sep-18 Hui, Justin Stoner, Tyler 4.4% $292,000 06-Jun-18* 10-Jun-18 112 80% Complete electrical installation to one permanent safety shower and electrical racks to three existing showers. 30-Sep-18 Hui, Justin Jansen, Jeff 4.4% $292,000 09-May-18 2 17-May-18 73 80% Complete one (1) basin cover replacement at ETF 30-Sep-18 Wright, Bryan Stoner, Ryan 12.9% $850,000 27-Jun-18 5-Jul-18 47 80% Complete AW Farm safety significant (SS) flow upgrades 30-Sep-18 Powers, Katie Larsen, Doug 4.9% $325,000 6-Feb-18 20-Feb-18* 123 80% Complete AZ Farm safety significant (SS) flow upgrades 30-Sep-18 Powers, Katie Larsen, Doug 4.9% $325,000 19-Mar-18 26-Mar-18* 104 80% In support of completion of TPA M-045-92, Complete Evapotranspiration Basin at SX Farm 30-Sep-18 Hui, Justin Jansen, Jeff 7.6% $500,000 06-Mar-18* 13-Mar-18 111 80% In support of completion of TPA M-045-92, Complete North Barrier as designed at SX Farm 30-Sep-18 Hui, Justin Jansen, Jeff 7.6% $500,000 09-May-18* 13-May-18 140 80% In support of completion of TPA M-045-92, Complete South Barrier as designed at SX Farm 30-Sep-18 Hui, Justin Jansen, Jeff 7.6% $500,000 30-Aug-18* 3-Sep-18 27 80% $6,602,000

SLIDE 34

34

Tank Farm Projects Performance CM and FYTD

December 2017

FY End WBS BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV SPI CPI BAC FCST P EAC SVFCST VAC TCPI FCST P 5.01.01.03.07 - Tank Waste Sampling Program FY17

4
4
14
14
14
14
5.01.01.03.08 - Core & Grab Sampling incl. ORSS & Equip
18

18 19

38

52 38

14
0.73
341

376 341

35

0.94 5.01.01.03.09 - Tank Waste Sampling Program FY18 211 211 220

8

630 630 583

47

1.00 1.08 2,725 2,725 2,660

65 1.01 5.01.01.03.10 - Grab Sampling 147 361 287 214 73 210 614 565 404 49 2.92 1.09 1,680 1,680 1,886

206

0.81 5.01.01.05.11 - 242-A Integrity Assessment 12 1 45

11
44

97 146 195 49

49

1.50 0.75 103 172 224 69

53

0.89 5.01.01.05.16 - Waste Transf Sys FFU Encasemnt Testing (FY16)

5
5
89

32 89 57

2.77
89

32 89 57

5.01.01.05.20 - DST Integrity Improvement Plan

60 235 185 175 49 90 238 186 147 52 2.63 1.28 1,383 2,516 2,104 1,141 421 1.19 5.01.01.05.23 - CHEM-D-42 Leak Assessment 22 28 36 6

8

60 104 91 44 13 1.73 1.15 238 297 321 59

24

0.84 5.01.01.05.26 - Tank Integrity Chemistry & Corrosion (FY17&18) 28 28

28

82 82 3

79

1.00 23.84 357 357 4 352 268.49 5.01.01.05.27 - DST Integrity Ultrasonic Testing FY17

76

95 76

19
402

548 402

147
0.73
1,689

1,459 1,689 230 1.41 5.01.01.05.28 - SST Integrity Visual Inspection 17 67 61 50 6 167 309 456 142

147

1.85 0.68 167 362 470 195

109

3.57 5.01.01.05.29 - Waste Transf Sys FFU Encasement Testing FY17

100

167 100

67
102

197 102

95
0.52
128

202 128

73

5.91 5.01.01.05.30 - DST Enhanced Annulus Visual Inspection FY17

1
1
21

43 21

22
0.48
26

54 26

28

0.47 5.01.01.05.31 - Tank Chemistry Control FY17

51

47 51 3

202

188 202 14

1.07
406

349 406 57 1.26 5.01.01.05.33 - FFS-Simulant Valve Testing 90 26 104

64
78

304 50 201

254
151

0.16 0.25 708 676 1,142 90

345

0.79 5.01.01.05.35 - SST Integrity Assessment 87 204 48 117 157 197 263 98 66 165 1.34 2.67 991 989 809

2

180 1.02 5.01.01.05.36 - DST Structural AOR to Support Tank Lvl Increase 104 67 73

37
6

411 199 218

212
18

0.48 0.92 411 790 977 401

165

0.81 5.01.01.05.38 - Integrity Project Mgt & Oversight FY18 205 205 154

51

611 611 338

272

1.00 1.80 2,643 2,643 1,975

669 1.24 5.01.01.05.40 - DST Integrity Ultrasonic Testing FY18 12 6 6

7

37 18 21

19
3

0.48 0.86 1,401 1,391 1,389 12 1.01 5.01.01.05.41 - SST Integrity Visual Inspection FY18

398

297 398 100

590

320 590 270

1.84

1,601 1,601 1,400

202 0.94 5.01.01.05.42 - Waste Transf Sys FFU Encasemnt Testing FY18

67

62 67 5

88

73 88 15

1.21

429 429 427 2 0.96 5.01.01.05.43 - DST Enhanced Annulus Visual Inspection FY18 28 15 3

12

12 52 35 16

17

18 0.67 2.14 809 809 651

158 1.22 5.01.01.05.44 - Tank Chemistry Control FY18 72 27 13

45

14 170 85 36

85

48 0.50 2.32 2,516 2,516 2,419 97 1.02 5.01.01.05.45 - ETF Integrity Assessment 30 24 65

6
40

255 213 127

42

86 0.83 1.68 497 732 543 235 189 1.25 5.01.01.05.47 - 219-S Integrity Assessment 107 33 38

75
6

206 39 57

166
18

0.19 0.69 1,562 1,562 1,046 516 1.54 5.01.02.06.13 - Replace ETF Basin Covers

3

16 3

13
14

78 14

64
0.18

3,591 3,605 4,758 14

1,153

0.77 5.01.04.01.16 - TF Automation Upgrades (DNFSB Action 3-1)

1

34 1

33
8

104 8

96
0.07
72

245 72

173

0.46 5.01.04.01.18 - DST In-Pit Heating 49 40 158

9
118

86 188 284 102

96

2.18 0.66 1,840 2,588 2,669 816

13

1.03 5.01.04.01.20 - LOW Van Software/Hardware upgrades

6

16 6

10
14

49 14

34
0.29
39

53 39

14

5.81 5.01.04.01.22 - Replacement of AW-106 Pump and Jumpers

1
1
10
1

10 11

(10.37)
10
1

10 11

5.01.04.01.30 - Cross-Site Transfer Line Activation

47 38 50

9
13

116 67 116

50
50

0.57 0.57 376 408 530 32

122

0.83 5.01.04.01.44 - AP-801 Water Service Upgrade 212 331 200 118 130 404 414 404 10 10 1.02 1.02 739 860 946 122

86

0.82 5.01.04.01.48 - DNFSB Recommendation 2012-2 Act 2-2 thru 2-4 434 449 443 16 6 1,287 710 886

576
176

0.55 0.80 4,155 3,731 4,341 156

30

1.04 5.01.04.01.50 - 242-A Process Condensate Sampling Station

7

15 7

9
22

47 22

25
0.47
384

390 384

6

1.06 5.01.04.01.51 - Tank Farm Projects Prog Oversight - Opt P2 1,094 1,094 1,185

91

3,258 3,258 3,203

56

1.00 1.02 14,103 14,103 12,718 1,385 1.14 5.01.04.01.54 - Continuous Air Monitor Upgrades Evaluation 17 87 18 70 70 119 133 36 15 97 1.12 3.68 130 233 83 103 150 2.12 5.01.04.01.60 - SY Exhauster Upgrades

1,032
1

1,032 1

1,032
144

1,032

144
1,032
144

1,032

144
5.01.04.01.64 - DST Transfer Pump Replacements (FY17&18)

113 269 239 156 30 352 593 497 241 97 1.69 1.19 6,099 7,013 7,090 1,154 163 1.01 5.01.04.01.69 - Leak Detector Relay Replacement 101 35 24

67

11 323 144 222

179
78

0.45 0.65 1,122 1,227 1,107 105 120 1.22 5.01.04.01.77 - TF Automation Upgrades (FY17&18) 75 141 146 67

4

232 335 276 103 59 1.44 1.22 2,773 2,986 3,297 303

220

0.91 5.01.04.01.79 - AW-103 and AW-104 Electrical Upgrades 41 7 10

34
3

127 93 23

34

71 0.73 4.13 516 626 837 109

211

0.65 5.01.04.01.80 - DNFSB-2012-2 Streamlined Approach to SS Vent.

667

667 674

7

0.99 5.01.04.01.81 - AP-106 Transfer Pump Replacement

7

28 7

21

79 1,030 798 952 233 13.09 1.29 79 1,076 801 998 276 15.08 5.01.04.01.85 - 242-A Spare Reboiler

13
13
15

41 15

26
0.35
515

651 515

135

0.82 5.01.04.01.87 - DST TAPD and ISP Revision (FY17 & 18) 51

51
61
61

1 0.01 (1.17) 392 392 284

108 1.38 5.01.04.01.88 - Safety Shower Upgrades 131 21 32

110
11

319 56 90

262
33

0.18 0.63 787 759 854

27
95

0.92 5.01.04.01.89 - Critical Transfer System Components

42

626 42

584
45

492 45

448
0.09
107

640 107

533

0.43 5.01.04.01.91 - 242-A Evaporator Fire Alarm Panel Upgrades

11
11
3

24 3

21
0.12
781

781 781

1.03 5.01.04.01.92 - 242-A Control Room HVAC Upgrade 42 21 31

20
9

193 370 320 178 50 1.92 1.16 214 443 361 229 82 1.77 5.01.04.01.93 - Annulus Emergency Pumping Capability 51 77 84 26

6

125 151 185 26

35

1.21 0.81 269 303 465 34

162

0.55 5.01.04.01.94 - Fire Alarm System Upgrades - 2704HV & 222-S Lab 128 17 59

110
42

380 40 70

340
30

0.11 0.57 399 427 400 28 27 1.17 5.01.05.01.13 - Construction & Commissioning Mgmt - Opt P2 240 240 304

64

715 715 733

18

1.00 0.98 3,094 3,094 2,567

527 1.30 5.02.01.04.11 - Interim SX Barrier - Construction 209 172 1,057

37
885

628 781 1,791 153

1,010

1.24 0.44 5,526 5,889 8,042 363

2,153

0.82 5.02.01.04.12 - Interim SX Barrier - North Construction

2

8 2

6
2

14 2

12
0.15

4,459 4,459 4,438

21 1.01 5.03.02.06.08 - Project Management Upgrades support DFLAW 103 68

36

67 355 346 5

9

341 0.98 63.62 1,379 1,564 972 185 592 1.26 5.03.02.06.09 - AP-107 Tank Farm Upgrades to Support DFLAW 246 376 266 129 110 1,081 1,361 1,103 280 258 1.26 1.23 3,089 3,733 3,424 644 309 1.02 5.03.02.06.10 - AP-105 Tank Farm Upgrades to Support DFLAW

304

232 304 72 351 760 1,025 409

265

2.16 0.74 7,439 7,743 7,037 304 706 1.16 5.03.02.06.16 - Tank-Side Cesium Removal Upgrade Support

424

424 423

1 1.00 5.03.02.06.17 - Tank-Side Cesium Removal Upgrades

3,601

3,601 3,594 7 1.00 Total 3,583 6,103 7,315 2,520

1,212

13,136 16,848 17,695 3,712

847

1.28 0.95 86,449 98,790 98,527 13,481 1,403 1.03 Current Month FYTD

SLIDE 35

35

Tank Farm Projects Current Month Variances

December 2017

SCHEDULE ($2,520k) COST (-$1,212k) FY17 Carryover Schedule Recovery ($1,320k)  $304k 5.3.2.6.10 Ap-105 90% design  $175k 5.1.1.5.20 DST Integrity Improvement Plan - Robotics design receipt(Kurion)  $129k 5.3.2.6.9 AP-107 Upgrade design to Support DFLAW gravel parking lot  $107k 5.1.4.1.48 DNFSB Recommendations – SS Flow installation AW Farm  $100k 5.1.1.5.29 Waste Transfer System NACE – AP-03D  $ 76k 5.1.1.5.27 DST UT AY-101  $ 67k 5.1.1.5.36 DST Structural AOR 5.1.1.5.35 SST Integrity Assessment ($157k) Cause: Awarded the IQRPE contract for less than originally budgeted by $89.4K which has resulted in more budget earned in relation to the actual costs incurred. The additional variance is due to efficiencies by the IQRPE subcontractor due to their previous experience on the 242-A Evaporator

assessment. The subcontractor efficiencies have resulted in fewer actual costs for the work

performed. Impact: Cost Savings 5.1.1.3.10 Grab Sampling ($214k) Cause: Accelerated performance of the AP-106 grab sample as resources were available. Impact: Ahead of Schedule CTD. 5.1.4.1.18 DST In-Pit Heating (-$118k) Cause: Additional subcontract design cost to accommodate Production Operations farm requirements for power. Impact: Unrecoverable costs added to the CTD cost variance. 5.1.1.5.41 SST Integrity Visual Inspections FY18 ($398k) Cause: Early performance of the Single Shell Tank (SST) visual inspections. Due to early planning support and efficiencies in planning similar packages, the project was able to execute seven SST visual inspections ahead of schedule. Impact: Ahead of Schedule CTD. 5.1.4.1.44 AP-801 Water Service Upgrade ($130k) Cause: Labor efficiencies experienced removing the existing water service equipment in a shortened performance duration. Impact: Cost savings to offset other anticipated equipment fabrication cost increases. 5.1.4.1.60 SY Exhauster Upgrades ($1,032k) Cause: Deferred remainder of the fabrication and installation to upgrade the SY Exhaust System Impact: Resulted in current month point adjustment and recovery of schedule variance. 5.1.4.1.89 Critical Transfer System Components (-$584k) Cause: Receipt of invoicing for critical spare parts ordered as part of this account with no budget per Management decision. Impact: CTD Cost variance will exist for these additional components. 5.1.4.1.88 Safety Shower Upgrades (-$110k) Cause: Conditions identified during field walk-downs for electrical rack siting and alteration of the location of power runs to simplify installation and future maintenance activities, required design changes impacting the excavation plan and work package development. As a result, award of the construction contract was delayed. Impact: Field work installation of the self- contained safety showers has been delayed; however, this should have no effect on the overall project completion forecast for Q4 FY18. 5.2.1.4.11 Interim SX Barrier Construction (-$885k) Cause: Correction of the previous reporting period unfavorable G&A for exceeding the GPP funding (-$433k). Continued increase in subcontract costs for North, South E., and South W.

excavation. The North area is being done by hand with minimal machine excavation due to being

inside SX farm, -$287k. In addition, increased labor usage costs were required for HPTs, and IH support for work being performed inside of the farm, -$27k. Impact: The labor usage additional costs for hand excavation and cutting/capping of exposed piping are unrecoverable. 5.1.4.1.94 Fire Alarm System Upgrades 2704-HV and 222-S (-$110k) Cause: Delayed contract award to allow vendors additional time to prepare proposals. Impact: No current impacts to completion within FY2018. 5.3.2.6.9 AP-107 Tank Farm Upgrades to Support DFLAW ($110k) Cause: Reduced subcontracted costs to complete overall layout, additional speed bumps and crosswalks for AP Farm gravel parking lot to support DFLAW upgrades. Impact: Cost savings

SLIDE 36

36

Tank Farm Projects Performance Cumulative to Date

December 2017

WBS BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV SPI CPI BAC TCPI 5.01.01.03.07 - Tank Waste Sampling Program FY17 2,779 2,779 3,176

397

1.00 0.87 2,779

5.01.01.03.08 - Core & Grab Sampling incl. ORSS & Equip

1,866 1,563 1,682

303
120

0.84 0.93 1,866 0.94 5.01.01.03.09 - Tank Waste Sampling Program FY18 630 630 583

47

1.00 1.08 2,725 1.01 5.01.01.03.10 - Grab Sampling 210 614 565 404 49 2.92 1.09 1,680 0.81 5.01.01.05.11 - 242-A Integrity Assessment 1,760 1,740 1,841

20
102

0.99 0.94 1,765 0.89 5.01.01.05.16 - Waste Transf Sys FFU Encasemnt Testing (FY16) 1,128 1,128 725

403

1.00 1.56 1,128

5.01.01.05.20 - DST Integrity Improvement Plan

1,458 464 664

994
200

0.32 0.70 2,751 1.19 5.01.01.05.23 - CHEM-D-42 Leak Assessment 292 277 407

15
130

0.95 0.68 470 0.84 5.01.01.05.26 - Tank Integrity Chemistry & Corrosion (FY17&18) 304 304 91

213

1.00 3.35 578 268.49 5.01.01.05.27 - DST Integrity Ultrasonic Testing FY17 3,651 2,364 2,946

1,287
582

0.65 0.80 3,651 1.41 5.01.01.05.28 - SST Integrity Visual Inspection 1,475 1,423 2,026

53
604

0.96 0.70 1,475 3.57 5.01.01.05.29 - Waste Transf Sys FFU Encasement Testing FY17 289 263 285

26
23

0.91 0.92 289 5.91 5.01.01.05.30 - DST Enhanced Annulus Visual Inspection FY17 959 954 604

5

350 0.99 1.58 959 0.47 5.01.01.05.31 - Tank Chemistry Control FY17 2,190 1,986 2,150

204
163

0.91 0.92 2,190 1.26 5.01.01.05.33 - FFS-Simulant Valve Testing 1,096 753 1,063

343
310

0.69 0.71 1,500 0.79 5.01.01.05.35 - SST Integrity Assessment 246 315 264 69 51 1.28 1.19 1,041 1.02 5.01.01.05.36 - DST Structural AOR to Support Tank Lvl Increase 1,429 816 792

613

24 0.57 1.03 1,429 0.81 5.01.01.05.38 - Integrity Project Mgt & Oversight FY18 611 611 338

272

1.00 1.80 2,643 1.24 5.01.01.05.40 - DST Integrity Ultrasonic Testing FY18 37 18 21

19
3

0.48 0.86 1,401 1.01 5.01.01.05.41 - SST Integrity Visual Inspection FY18

590

320 590 270

1.84

1,601 0.94 5.01.01.05.42 - Waste Transf Sys FFU Encasemnt Testing FY18

88

73 88 15

1.21

429 0.96 5.01.01.05.43 - DST Enhanced Annulus Visual Inspection FY18 52 35 16

17

18 0.67 2.14 809 1.22 5.01.01.05.44 - Tank Chemistry Control FY18 170 85 36

85

48 0.50 2.32 2,516 1.02 5.01.01.05.45 - ETF Integrity Assessment 1,605 1,327 831

277

496 0.83 1.60 1,846 1.25 5.01.01.05.47 - 219-S Integrity Assessment 206 39 57

166
18

0.19 0.69 1,562 1.54 5.01.02.06.13 - Replace ETF Basin Covers 3,641 3,641 5,956

2,315

1.00 0.61 7,232 0.77 5.01.04.01.16 - TF Automation Upgrades (DNFSB Action 3-1) 8,557 8,493 10,023

65
1,531

0.99 0.85 8,557 0.46 5.01.04.01.18 - DST In-Pit Heating 3,460 2,745 4,497

714
1,752

0.79 0.61 5,213 1.03 5.01.04.01.20 - LOW Van Software/Hardware upgrades 1,327 1,303 1,693

24
390

0.98 0.77 1,327 5.81 5.01.04.01.22 - Replacement of AW-106 Pump and Jumpers 5,186 5,186 5,831

645

1.00 0.89 5,186

5.01.04.01.30 - Cross-Site Transfer Line Activation

194 113 158

81
45

0.58 0.71 454 0.83 5.01.04.01.44 - AP-801 Water Service Upgrade 864 752 683

112

69 0.87 1.10 1,199 0.82 5.01.04.01.48 - DNFSB Recommendation 2012-2 Act 2-2 thru 2-4 10,663 9,931 8,515

733

1,416 0.93 1.17 13,532 1.04 5.01.04.01.50 - 242-A Process Condensate Sampling Station 1,073 711 626

362

85 0.66 1.14 1,073 1.06 5.01.04.01.51 - Tank Farm Projects Prog Oversight - Opt P2 17,453 17,453 16,192

1,262

1.00 1.08 28,298 1.14 5.01.04.01.54 - Continuous Air Monitor Upgrades Evaluation 228 140 48

88

92 0.61 2.91 239 2.12 5.01.04.01.60 - SY Exhauster Upgrades 975 975 1,746

771

1.00 0.56 975

5.01.04.01.64 - DST Transfer Pump Replacements (FY17&18)

2,389 1,476 1,486

913
10

0.62 0.99 8,136 1.01 5.01.04.01.69 - Leak Detector Relay Replacement 662 378 756

284
378

0.57 0.50 1,461 1.22 5.01.04.01.77 - TF Automation Upgrades (FY17&18) 1,541 1,340 775

201

565 0.87 1.73 4,082 0.91 5.01.04.01.79 - AW-103 and AW-104 Electrical Upgrades 268 125 45

143

80 0.47 2.77 658 0.65 5.01.04.01.80 - DNFSB-2012-2 Streamlined Approach to SS Vent. 25 25 5

20

1.00 4.70 692 0.99 5.01.04.01.81 - AP-106 Transfer Pump Replacement 3,569 3,523 4,523

46
1,000

0.99 0.78 3,569 15.08 5.01.04.01.85 - 242-A Spare Reboiler 982 481 344

501

137 0.49 1.40 982 0.82 5.01.04.01.87 - DST TAPD and ISP Revision (FY17 & 18) 448 387 272

61

115 0.86 1.42 778 1.38 5.01.04.01.88 - Safety Shower Upgrades 1,335 1,100 1,228

235
128

0.82 0.90 1,803 0.92 5.01.04.01.89 - Critical Transfer System Components 284 221 847

63
625

0.78 0.26 284 0.43 5.01.04.01.91 - 242-A Evaporator Fire Alarm Panel Upgrades 811 33 68

778
36

0.04 0.48 811 1.03 5.01.04.01.92 - 242-A Control Room HVAC Upgrade 639 587 573

52

15 0.92 1.03 660 1.77 5.01.04.01.93 - Annulus Emergency Pumping Capability 195 187 236

8
49

0.96 0.79 339 0.55 5.01.04.01.94 - Fire Alarm System Upgrades - 2704HV & 222-S Lab 437 68 78

368
9

0.16 0.88 456 1.17 5.01.05.01.13 - Construction & Commissioning Mgmt - Opt P2 3,821 3,821 3,286

535

1.00 1.16 6,200 1.30 5.02.01.04.11 - Interim SX Barrier - Construction 1,288 1,079 1,957

210
878

0.84 0.55 6,186 0.82 5.02.01.04.12 - Interim SX Barrier - North Construction

2

14 2

12
0.15

4,459 1.01 5.03.02.06.08 - Project Management Upgrades support DFLAW 544 351 9

193

342 0.64 37.55 1,568 1.26 5.03.02.06.09 - AP-107 Tank Farm Upgrades to Support DFLAW 4,528 4,164 4,450

364
286

0.92 0.94 6,536 1.02 5.03.02.06.10 - AP-105 Tank Farm Upgrades to Support DFLAW 2,446 2,551 2,556 105

5

1.04 1.00 9,533 1.16 5.03.02.06.16 - Tank-Side Cesium Removal Upgrade Support

424

1.00 5.03.02.06.17 - Tank-Side Cesium Removal Upgrades

3,601

1.00 Total 443,602 433,834 439,147

9,769
5,313

0.98 0.99 516,915 1.03 Cumulative to Date

SLIDE 37

37

Tank Farm Projects CTD Schedule Variances

December 2017

CTD SV October 2017 (-$9,769k)

5.1.1.3.8 Core & Grab Sampling (-$303k) Cause: Delay in obtaining the AY-102 grab sample (-$147k) and a delay in the procurement of sampling equipment (-$157k).The AY-102 sample is dependent upon a determination on SCBA or APR requirements to perform the work. Also higher priority sampling in support of C-105 retrieval in September contributed to the delay. The purchase of sampling equipment in September has been delayed due to engineering evaluation of functions and requirements for the equipment, as well as, examining currently available equipment for ease in procurement. Impact: This variance does not impact any other control accounts. Sampling schedule variance will continue until higher priority sampling has been completed and a determination on SCBA or APR requirements has been made. Equipment schedule variance will continue through second quarter of FY18 due to engineering evaluation and long lead time for procurement, however the project has sufficient equipment to execute current scope of work. Corrective Action: The schedule variance for AY-102 sample will be recovered in the coming months once higher priority sampling has been completed and a determination on SCBA or APR requirements has been made (Projected March). The sampling equipment variance will be recovered once equipment has been ordered and received (Projected March). 5.1.1.5.20 DST Integrity Improvement Plan (-$994k) Cause: Delay in design, fabrication, & delivery under both the Robotic Crawler WBS 5.1.1.5.20.1 and the Flash Thermography WBS 5.1.1.5.20.2. Two contracts have been awarded under WBS 5.1.1.5.20.1 (Robotic Crawlers). One contract was placed with Kurion and the other was placed with Adaptive Energy. Each vendor will provide a different robotic crawler capable of visually examining a Double Shell Tank bottom via the air slot in the annulus. These contracts were initially delayed as the technical evaluation and proposal ranking process took longer than anticipated. The delayed placement of the Kurion contract has caused the Final Design & Fabrication activities to push out three months, from June to September. In addition, the Adaptive Energy contract was set up with "lump sum" payment terms and their crawler isn't scheduled to arrive until December 2017. This means the performance for that scope will be taken all at once, after the crawler is received. The original plan was to take performance throughout the crawler design & build process which is how the Kurion contract was setup. The contract under WBS 5.1.1.5.20.2 (Flash Thermography) was not placed. A feasibility study was done to ensure the final product could be utilized to meet the scopes intent. It was determined that the Flash Thermography technology could not properly be deployed in the field so pursuing a contract was no longer viable. With the scopes intent not able to be met and the project on hold. The Preliminary & Final Design, as well as Fabrication, Test & Delivery activities are now behind schedule. Impact: Due to the lump sum payment terms on the Adaptive Energy contract under WBS 5.1.1.5.20.1 the CTD schedule variance was expected to grow. This variance should reduce in December as the robotic crawler under that contract is scheduled to be received and the associated performance will be taken. However, due to the delayed start in placing both contracts under WBS 5.1.1.5.20.1 & WBS 5.1.1.5.20.2. The CTD schedule variance should remain until the project is completed. Flash thermography scope will no longer be performed and has been logged to go off contract. Impact: Due to the lump sum payment terms on the Adaptive Energy contract under WBS 5.1.1.5.20.1, the CTD schedule variance was expected to grow. This variance should reduce in December as the robotic crawler under that contract is scheduled to be received and the associated performance will be taken. However, due to the delayed start in placing both contracts under WBS 5.1.1.5.20.1 & WBS 5.1.1.5.20.2. The CTD schedule variance should remain until the project is completed. Corrective Action: No corrective action, however the flash thermography scope balance has been logged as part of the scopes to go off contract. Upon receipt of formal deletion modification the baseline will be updated to reflect removal. 5.1.1.5.27 DST Ultrasonic Testing FY17 (-$1,287k) Cause: Delayed start of Ultrasonic Testing (UT) at AZ-101, AY-101, and the SY Farm floor scans. The delay was originally caused by the lack of necessary support labor resources required to perform the UT Scans at AN-106. These labor resources were performing UT scans in the 242 Evaporator Room under WBS 5.1.1.5.11. After the AN-106 UT field work kicked off in December, additional delays were incurred due to poor weather conditions. The Hanford site was closed, delayed or released early a number of times in December & January. These weather related delays caused the unfavorable schedule variance to grow and subsequently delay the start of UT scans at AZ-101. UT field work at AZ-101 was again delayed due to the PUREX tunnel collapse that occurred on May 9th, 2017. Three working days were lost as crews weren’t allowed into the farm (May 9th-11th). On May 12th, the UT crew was allowed back into the farm to retrieve the two crawlers that had been left on the Double Shell Tank (DST) annulus wall since the take cover was initiated on May 9th. The extended period of time each crawler spent on the annulus wall, caused them to receive high doses of radiation. This caused some electrical components to fail and require 2 additional working days to repair (May 15th-16th). On May 18th, UT field work at AZ-101 was shut down due to the unexpected discovery of contamination in the tank annulus. This discovery resulted in a stop work at AZ- 101 as an event investigation was implemented to review what took place and develop any necessary corrective actions. Due to the delays detailed above, UT testing at AZ-101 & AY-101 are now behind schedule.AY-101 UT scans are forecast to start early November 2017. Impact: The delayed start, inclement weather, PUREX tunnel collapse, and contamination event have impacted the schedule to perform Ultrasonic Testing (UT) on six Double Shell Tanks (DST) in

FY17. The field work for AN-106 finished in March but had already slipped 47 days. The three SY floor scans finished 34 days behind schedule and the field work at AZ-101 & AY-101 is now planned for
FY18. The final report on the last UT is scheduled to finish on 5/16/1.

Corrective Action: Continue to work with the Work Area Manager and Production Controls to ensure the necessary resources are available to complete the UT field work at AZ-101(March 2018) and AY-101 (December 2017).

SLIDE 38

38

Tank Farm Projects CTD Schedule Variances

December 2017

CTD SV October 2017 (-$9,769k)

5.1.1.5.36 DST Structural AOR to Support Tank Level Rise (-$613k) Cause: 1) Delayed contract award and start, 2) resource availability issues, and 3) additional seismic modeling requirements being identified. 1) This scope is primarily based on a large contract with Pacific Northwest National Laboratories (PNNL). The placing of this contract was delayed as engineering resources weren't available to develop and review a technically accurate statement of work. This resulted in a two month delay in PNNL starting their support. 2) PNNL experienced resource availability issues related to a delay in placing their subcontract with Becht Nuclear Services to support performance of the Seismic modeling. The contract was delayed as Becht was no longer on PNNL's Evaluated Suppliers List (ESL) and needed to have their Quality Assurance (QA) program re-reviewed. WRPS also experienced delays in having the Evaluation Criteria Document reviewed. The contracted expert reviewer was out of the country and unavailable. These resource related delay's resulted in an additional two month slip. 3) Recommendations from the expert reviewer led to an additional seismic modeling approach being implemented into the overall Analysis of Record. This has delayed the completion of a final seismic modeling approach and resulted in an additional four month schedule slip Impact: Overall, the project is projecting to finish 9 months behind schedule (September 2018). Corrective Action: No corrective actions have been identified at this time. The project is planning to finish nine months behind schedule (September 2018). 5.1.4.1.18 DST In-Pit Heating (-$714k) Cause: Procurement of heaters needed for FY18 field installation have been delayed by 5 months due to the procurement resources working on higher company priority procurements. Originally the materials were planned to be delivered in August, the current delivery date is beginning of the second quarter FY18. Impact: Projects affected if DST In-Pit Heating is not completed are as follows: TF Automation Part 2 due to the need for the project to install the AN01A and AN06A temperature monitoring trees and update associated design media to account for the utilization of the upgrades trees from both projects and vapor controls by limiting the use of operators and redeploying these resources to

ther projects would not occur (projects such as DST transfers).

Corrective Action: Project has worked with procurement to insure the material request is awarded and heater delivery is scheduled the second quarter of FY2018. 5.1.4.1.48 DNFSB Recommendation 2012 2-2 thru 2-4 (-$733k) Cause: Delays in completion of AW Farm installation engineering change notice (ECN). During the review of the AW Farm ECN, an interference was observed with the planned position of the by-pass spools and contamination higher than planned was noted. The resolution of these issues delayed the completion of the design by two weeks which in turn belayed the completion of the work package planning which delayed the field work start. AW field work was originally planned to start first week of October but is now planned for December 2017. Impact: The total of float for DNSFB 2012-2 Action 2-3 decreased by 9 days making the total float 1 day. The total of float for DNSFB 2012-2 Action 2-2 decreased by 39 days making the total float -29 day. Corrective Action: Project is working mechanical installation at all tanks in parallel vs. sequential as planned. 5.1.4.1.50 242-A Process Condensate Sampling Station (-$362k) Cause: Delay in the planning and installation of Condensate Sampling Stations in the 242-A facility. This work is considered secondary to the facility completing evaporator campaigns and the subsequent outage at 242-A. The project will coordinate with the facility management to complete this install in FY18 (currently forecasted to finish in March FY18). Impact: No significant impact, this schedule variance was expected following delays at 242-A (The Evaporator 5.1.2.3.3) which has affected all downstream activities. Corrective Action: None. Project priority was determined to be secondary and is currently forecast for completion in March FY18. 5.1.4.1.64 DST Transfer Pump Replacements (-$913k) Cause: Result of WRPS reprioritization of the pump replacement projects. The AZ-102 pump replacement mobilization for pump removal is now the successor to the AW-103 pump flush field work. In November 2017, the AW-103 project realized a risk AW103-008-R, pump plugged during flushing. This realized risk prioritized and accelerated the schedule for AW-103 to mobilize and perform pump flush activities. In addition, as a result of this realignment, mobilization and field work activities associated with the AZ-102 pump replacement project have been further delayed and will not be performed until Q2 of FY 2018. Impact: Due to the acceleration of AW-103 pump replacement, AZ-102 field mobilization has been delayed until after pump flush activities have completed for AW-103. The AZ-102 project is anticipated to ramp back up with mobilization in Q2. Corrective Action: Full schedule recovery for fabrication and procurement activities are planned upon the receipt of the AZ-102 Actuator in January 2018. Full schedule recovery for the design activities is planned upon the release of the AZ-102 As-Built ECN in March 2018.

SLIDE 39

39

Tank Farm Projects CTD Schedule Variances

December 2017

CTD SV October 2017 (-$9,769k)

5.1.4.1.85 242-A Spare Re-boiler (-$501k) Cause: Delayed receipt of the spare 242-A re-boiler currently undergoing fabrication. The re-boiler was originally anticipated to be received in September FY17; however, during the design review it was determined that an additional Finite Element Analysis (FEA) was needed to address nozzle loads of the vessel. Impact: The additional analysis has delayed the receipt of the spare re-boiler until March FY18 and will incur a negative schedule variance that will persist until receipt. Corrective Action: The additional analysis is complete and has been approved to allow the vendor to proceed with fabrication. 5.1.4.1.91 242-A Evaporator Fire Alarm Panel Upgrades (-$778k) Cause: Delay of installation as a result of an issue with original engineering change notice (ECN) needed for the installation. Engineering determined the original design did not have enough information to upgrade the fire alarm system in 242-A Evaporator. A reference engineering change notice (ECN) was developed and will be released which will allow for new design to be completed. The project is awaiting contract award. The field work is scheduled to start third quarter of FY18 and complete ahead of an evaporator campaign. Impact: Currently no impact to any evaporator campaign and field work will be executed within available facility windows. Corrective Action: Project will evaluate a recovery plan with the subcontractor once the contract is awarded. 5.1.4.1.94 Fire Alarm System Upgrades – 2704-HV & 222-S (-$368k) Cause: Two month delay in award of design subcontract as result of bidders’ requests to extend proposal period to find specialized fire systems subcontractor for sub-tier. Impact: No impact to other projects or evaporator campaigns. Corrective Action: Review subcontractor proposal durations to insure completion during fiscal year. 5.3.2.6.9 AP-107 Tank Farm Upgrades to Support DFLAW (-$364k) Cause: Onsite field delays in the installation of a new gravel parking lot in the AP farm that has pushed the work completion into FY18. The overall layout including additional speed bumps and further considerations of crosswalks that increased overall duration. Project expects to complete this work by November FY18. Impact: No significant impact. Corrective Action: No corrective action required, this work is of secondary priority and will not affect any successor activities. OFFSET BY PROJECTS AHEAD OF SCHEDULE 5.1.1.3.10 Grab Sampling (FY18) ($404k) Cause: Acceleration of two grab samples AP-107 and AP-106. Impact: Ahead of schedule performance. Corrective Action: None 5.1.1.5.41 SST Integrity Visual Inspections (FY18) ($590k) Cause: Early performance of the Single Shell Tank (SST) visual inspections. Due to early planning support and efficiencies in planning similar packages, the project was able to execute scope sooner than originally anticipated. Impact: The early planning support and efficiencies have resulted in 7 of 12 videos being completed as of December FY18. Corrective Action: None

SLIDE 40

40

Tank Farm Projects Schedule Recovery

December 2017

2017 Carryover Recovery (December)  $ 304k AP-105 90% design  $ 175k Robotic crawler Designs  $ 129k AP-107 DFLAW gravel parking lot  $ 107k DNFSB – SS Flow installation AW Farm  $ 100k AP-03D NACE  $ 76k DST UT – AY-101  $ 67k DST AOR  $ 67k SST Visual Inspections FY17  $ 60k TF Automation Upgrades Part II January  $ 420k DFLAW upgrades AP-105  $ 344k DST Transfer Pumps AW-103  $ 135k DST UT AY-101  $ 174k DST In-Pit Heating  $ 135k DNFSB SS Flow installation AW Farm  $ 115k SST Integrity Visual Inspections  $ 100k TF Automation Part II February  $ 609k AP-105 Tank Farm upgrades  $ 430k DST Improvement plan completion Kurion robotic fabrication/testing  $ 400k DNFSB SS Flow installation AW Farm  $ 331k DST UT AY-101  $ 329k SX Barrier Transpiration Basin  $ 246k 242-A Process Condensate Station  $ 206k SST Visual Inspections - reports  $ 200k DST In-Pit Heating  $200k Leak Detector Relay Replacement  $ 200k TF Automation Upgrades Phase II AP Farm  $ 157k SST Integrity Visual Inspections  $ 148k Grab Sampling March  $ 438k ETF Basin Cover replacement #2  $ 628k TF Automation Upgrades installation  $ 646k SX Farm Barrier South  $ 484k AP-105 TF Upgrades  $ 190k Grab Sampling AW-106  $ 180k DNFSB SS Flow installation AY/AZ Farm  $ 150k DST UT AY-101 December Forecast Deltas  $ 355k TF Upgrades for DFLAW design  $ 331k DST UT AY-101  $ 133k DNFSB SS Flow installation AW Farm  $ 129k 242-A Process Condensate Upgrade  $ 97k SX Farm Evapotranspiration Basin

SLIDE 41

41

Tank Farm Projects Schedule Recovery

December 2017

SLIDE 42

42

Tank Farm Projects Performance - FY17 Carryover Forecast Recovery

December 2017 Previous 13,511k FY18 Acceleration ( 31k) SY Deferral ( 1,032k) December 12,479k Recovery Through December 41% Projected Recovery by April 81%

Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17 Jan-18 Feb-18 Mar-18 Apr-18 May-18 Jun-18 Jul-18 Aug-18 Sep-18 Grand Total 5.1.1.3.8 - Core & Grab Sampling incl. ORSS & Equip 1,653 18,184 18,184 156,091 147,295 341,408 5.1.1.5.11 - 242-A Integrity Assessment 6,001 40,767 12,620 9,518 68,905 5.1.1.5.16 - Waste Transf Sys FFU Encasemnt Testing (FY16) 89,031 89,031 5.1.1.5.20 - DST Integrity Improvement Plan 233,832 430,742 94,669 40,765 125,607 146,330 69,250 1,141,194 5.1.1.5.23 - CHEM-D-42 Leak Assessment 41,988 11,793 3,848 367 96 435 384 58,911 5.1.1.5.27 - DST Integrity Ultrasonic Testing FY17 133,727 191,475 76,364 135,422 331,451 150,323 204,141 251,127 167,191 32,330 15,495 1,689,045 5.1.1.5.28 - SST Integrity Visual Inspection 213 75,148 66,694 38,198 12,905 1,422 194,580 5.1.1.5.29 - Waste Transf Sys FFU Encasement Testing FY17 411 1,568 100,465 20,485 5,532 128,461 5.1.1.5.30 - DST Enhanced Annulus Visual Inspection FY17 20,554 5,203 25,757 5.1.1.5.31 - Tank Chemistry Control FY17 57,135 93,854 50,565 89,148 34,991 54,441 1,382 1,727 1,382 1,382 1,727 18,251 405,984 5.1.1.5.33 - FFS-Simulant Valve Testing 235 2,301 26,020 16,252 25,918 18,805 89,531 5.1.1.5.36 - DST Structural AOR to Support Tank Lvl Increase 4,834 4,834 67,111 66,344 87,586 60,746 55,512 53,803 400,770 5.1.1.5.45 - ETF Integrity Assessment 62,987 63,776 19,563 32,311 29,463 11,113 15,835 235,048 5.1.2.6.13 - Replace ETF Basin Covers 7,910 2,821 3,183 13,914 5.1.4.1.16 - TF Automation Upgrades (DNFSB Action 3-1) 5,979 813 715 11,381 672 553 13,496 38,664 72,275 5.1.4.1.18 - DST In-Pit Heating 48,121 99,955 26,416 102,139 395,575 73,289 10,620 13,275 10,620 10,620 13,275 12,137 816,043 5.1.4.1.20 - LOW Van Software/Hardware upgrades 7,758 703 5,661 6,934 10,605 6,879 38,541 5.1.4.1.22 - Replacement of AW-106 Pump and Jumpers 10,337 10,337 5.1.4.1.30 - Cross-Site Transfer Line Activation 10,182 3,394 18,106 31,682 5.1.4.1.44 - AP-801 Water Service Upgrade 9,686 22,993 14,070 68,589 6,116 75 121,530 5.1.4.1.48 - DNFSB Recommendation 2012-2 Act 2-2 thru 2-4 38,765 3,241 107,492 6,861 156,359 5.1.4.1.50 - 242-A Process Condensate Sampling Station 6,856 8,752 6,507 21,498 246,009 94,661 384,283 5.1.4.1.54 - Continuous Air Monitor Upgrades Evaluation 36,478 45,966 20,315 102,759 5.1.4.1.60 - SY Exhauster Upgrades

5.1.4.1.64 - DST Transfer Pump Replacements (FY17&18)

38,116 108,841 27,631 191,426 79,902 53,570 87,136 256,720 87,382 223,379 1,154,104 5.1.4.1.69 - Leak Detector Relay Replacement 48,249 49,401 1,027 6,110 104,787 5.1.4.1.77 - TF Automation Upgrades (FY17&18) 48,990 59,905 99,683 94,764 303,341 5.1.4.1.79 - AW-103 and AW-104 Electrical Upgrades 43,316 9,498 7,469 38,541 10,384 109,208 5.1.4.1.81 - AP-106 Transfer Pump Replacement 930,427 13,683 7,220 32,692 13,612 997,634 5.1.4.1.85 - 242-A Spare Reboiler 8,195 5,962 368 3,672 3,672 16,906 476,678 515,452 5.1.4.1.89 - Critical Transfer System Components 2,364 42,161 24,965 37,981 107,470 5.1.4.1.90 - 241-BY Farm Encapsulate Asbestos Insulation 2,072 2,072 5.1.4.1.91 - 242-A Evaporator Fire Alarm Panel Upgrades 1,485 1,485 16,121 23,757 34,143 13,118 628,885 62,089 781,084 5.1.4.1.92 - 242-A Control Room HVAC Upgrade 197,927 31,554 229,481 5.1.4.1.93 - Annulus Emergency Pumping Capability 12,751 3,416 18,431 34,597 5.1.4.1.94 - Fire Alarm System Upgrades - 2704HV & 222-S Lab 14,082 14,082 28,165 5.2.1.4.11 - Interim SX Barrier - Construction 261,767 4,078 5,072 92,099 363,016 5.3.2.6.10 - AP-105 Tank Farm Upgrades to Support DFLAW 73,674 230,253 303,927 5.3.2.6.8 - Project Management Upgrades support DFLAW 95,551 13,294 54,429 21,354 184,628 5.3.2.6.9 - AP-107 Tank Farm Upgrades to Support DFLAW 285,307 83,252 191,210 48,463 4,860 6,075 4,860 6,075 4,860 4,860 4,166 643,988 MONTHLY 2,344,721 1,489,931 1,319,769 1,248,126 1,886,593 846,816 933,445 1,375,883 479,854 341,821 181,958 30,388 12,479,304 CUMULATIVE 2,344,721 3,834,651 5,154,421 6,402,547 8,289,139 9,135,956 10,069,400 11,445,283 11,925,137 12,266,958 12,448,916 12,479,304

SLIDE 43

43

Tank Farm Projects FY18 Spend Plan

December 2017 December delta: (-$127k), (-1.7 %)

(-$447k) – DST Improvement Plan – Adaptive Energy robotic crawler at AVS, not accepted thru to site
(-$205k) – AP-801 Water Service Upgrade delayed installation for fabrication of new equipment
(-$140k) - Critical Spare Components

OFFSET BY:

$279k – SX Farm Evapotranspiration Basin SCBA inefficiencies and trench interferences
$168k – SST Visual Inspections accelerated (FY18)
$124k – Construction & Commissioning new hire training

FY Spend Forecast Delta (-$8,930 k), (-8.3%)

(-$13,885k) SY Exhauster Upgrades deferral (RPP-18-032)
(-$453k) DST Improvement Plan – remove Flash Thermography from EAC
$3,594k TSCR Upgrades new account (RPP-18-033)
$ 651k Simulant Valve Testing subcontract increase
$ 423k TSCR Support new account (RPP-18-033)
$ 412k SX Farm Evapotranspiration SCBA inefficiencies
$ 155k DST In-Pit Heating - trenching for power in AW Farm
$ 151k DNFSB SS Flow instrumentation – OT for AY/AZ Farm installation to meet DNFSB deliverable

PDN Delta $8,934k

(-$13,885k) SY Exhauster Upgrades deferral (RPP-18-032)
(-$453k) DST Improvement Plan – remove Flash Thermography from EAC
$3,594k TSCR Upgrades new account (RPP-18-033)
$ 651k Simulant Valve Testing subcontract increase
$ 423k TSCR Support new account (RPP-18-033)
$ 412k SX Farm Evapotranspiration Atkins ramp up and training
$ 155k DST In-Pit Heating - trenching for power in AW Farm
$ 151k DNFSB SS Flow instrumentation – OT for AY/AZ Farm installation to meet DNFSB deliverable

ACWP/ETC Oct-17 (4W) Nov-17 (5W) Dec-17 (4W) Jan-18 (4W) Feb-18 (4W) Mar-18 (5W) Apr-18 (4W) May-18 (5W) Jun-18 (4W) Jul-18 (4W) Aug-18 (5W) Sep-18 (5W) FY Spend Forecast PDN Target Delta Oct-17 3,939 7,989 10,481 10,212 8,214 8,668 7,917 10,039 11,837 10,364 12,655 8,063 110,378 Nov-17 3,939 6,442 7,442 7,050 7,807 9,799 11,526 10,295 10,662 8,678 9,467 14,325 107,431 Dec-17 3,939 6,442 7,315 4,767 8,407 10,475 10,611 12,457 9,846 8,465 9,892 5,886 98,501 107,435 8,934 Delta

1,927
1,547
127
8,930

Percentage

32.9%
19.4%
1.7%
8.3%

SLIDE 44

44

Tank Farm Projects Risks, Opportunities and Emergent Scope

December 2017

Risk

Schedule coordination of infrastructure projects with the 242-A Evaporator campaigns.
Access to AW Farm by multiple crews on SCBA.
Potential impacts from PFP work zone.
Coordination of work in AP Farm.

Emergent Work Scope Realization Date Forecast Finish Funding Source 222-S Potable Water Air Gap Nov-16 TBD

Prod. Ops.

2704HV & 222S Fire System Panel Replacement - design only Dec-16 FY18 TFP ETF Lead-lag compressor design/install - BBL (Project Manager) Mar-17 TBD

Prod. Ops.

SX Barrier Construction (Third section) Apr-17 TBD TFP Emergency Annulus Pumping Design/Fabrication (not on contract) May-17 FY18 TFP Cross Site Transfer Lines Qualification & Monitoring (not on contract) May-17 TBD TFP AP Farm Change Trailer and Parking Lot May-17 TBD TFP ETF Facility Stairs/Platforms (PM) Jun-17 FY18

Prod. Ops

RCE Equipment (e.g. Core Sample Truck disposal) (PM and crew) Jun-17 TBD

Prod. Ops.

219S Integrity Assessment - Field work Jul-17 FY18 TFP ETF 310/311 Integrity Assessment (Proposal) Jul-17 FY18 TFP Predictive Maintenance Pilot (PM) Oct-17 FY18

Prod. Ops.

AY-102 Sample to support Retrieval Closure Oct-17 FY18 Retrieval U-107 LOW Replacement (BCR) TBD TBD TFP TSCR Infrastructure Upgrades ( ORP Letter of Direction) (Proposal) TBD TBD TFP C-301 Visual Inspection and Direct Push Characterization Planning and field resources) Nov-17 FY18 Closure

Tank Farm Projects FY17 Emergent Scope Tracker

SLIDE 45

45

Tank Farm Projects Accomplishments and Look Ahead

December 2017

Accomplishments: December:

Performed AW-102 grab sample
Performed AP-106 grab sample
Performed AP-103-D NACE pit inspection
Commenced AP-801 upgrades by removing existing water flow controller equipment
Installed liner SX Farm Evapotranspiration Basin
Continued AW Farm SS flow instrumentation installation
Completed SST visual inspections in TX Farm (four) and SX Farm (three)

Look Ahead: January:

Complete AW Farm SS flow instrumentation installation
TF automation wireless equipment installation AP Farm
Safety Shower upgrades – AW Farm
Fabricate/ Factory Acceptance Testing AN and AP Farm Wireless Infrastructure Equipment
Complete two SST visual inspections (CPL)
Receive bids for SX Farm asphalt barrier
Flush AW-103 pump to verify extent of condition and laser measure for equipment to extract waste
Initiate AY/AZ Mechanical installation SS flow

February:

Install AP-801 new water flow controller equipment
Complete Ultrasonic Testing DST AY-101
Complete AP-801 mechanical/electrical installation of new water flow controller
Complete site preparation and trenching for AW-103/AW-104 electrical upgrades
SX Barrier Monitoring System installation Phase I
SX Farm Evapotranspiration Basin – Hydro-seed and Install fencing
Issue subcontract release for placement of SX asphalt barrier
Receive in-pit heaters for remaining pits installations and begin AN pit installation activities
Complete final three SST visual inspections for FY18
Complete 242-A Facility HVAC Upgrade
AW-103/AW-104 electrical upgrade site preparation & trenching
Perform CAT SS flow instrumentation installation in AW Farm
Perform AW DST Annulus visual inspection
SS Flow installation in AY/AZ Farm

March:

Perform grab sampling AW-106.
Receive Visual Robotic crawler from Kurion
Continue DST Enhanced Annulus visual inspections for FY18
Complete AY/AZ Farm SS flow instrumentation installation
Install AZ-102 pump removal equipment

SLIDE 46

46

Tank Farm Projects Approved Baseline Change Requests Log

December 2017

BCR Number BCR Title Reporting Month FY18 (MR / XFER) FY18 (NEW) FY18 Total FY17 Baseline Running Total NA FY18 Baseline - Start of Fiscal Year (As of 10/01/17) September $0 $0 $0 $91,523,246 $91,523,246 RPP-18-024 AW-103 Pump Flush & AZ-102 Removal/Installation Re-plan November $453,170 $0 $453,170 $91,976,416 $453,170 $0 $453,170 $91,976,416 RPP-18-032 Move Remaining SY Exhauster Scope to UB for Removal from Contract December

$9,661,410

$0

$9,661,410

$82,315,006 RPP-18-033 Tank-Side Cesium Removal Balance of Plant December $0 $4,024,492 $4,024,492 $86,339,498 RPP-18-034 TFP Internal Re-planning December $0 $0 $0 $86,339,498

$9,661,410

$4,024,492

$5,636,918

$86,339,498 RPP-18-052 CP-17-004 Fire Alarm Panel Replacements (222-S Design Scope Addition & NTE Increase) January $0 $1,029,890 $1,029,890 $87,369,388 RPP-18-051 CP-17-017 Annulus Emergency Pumping Capability Scope Addition & NTE Increase January $0 $1,333,950 $1,333,950 $88,703,338 RPP-18-040 U-107 Liquid Observation Well (LOW) Replacement January $552,930 $0 $552,930 $89,256,268 January 2018 $552,930 $2,363,840 $2,916,770 $89,256,268 RPP-18-035 TFP PMR Scope Adjustments February TBD TBD $89,256,268 RPP-18-XXX ETF Basin Cover Detail Planning February TBD TBD $89,256,268 RPP-18-XXX WFD Tank Farm Upgrades February TBD TBD $89,256,268 February 2018 $0 $0 $0 $89,256,268 RPP-18-XXX CP-17-018 Cross Site Transfer Lines Scope Addition & NTE Increase March $0 $0 $0 $89,256,268

$8,655,310

$6,388,332

$2,266,978

$89,256,268 November 2017 Cumulative Fiscal Year to Date October 2017 December 2017

SLIDE 47

47

Tank Farm Projects Contract Changes

December 2017

Title Project Manager Status NTE ($K) Total Impact ($K)

Contract Change

10,500 TBD FY18 10,500 TBD CP-16-017 DST Feed Delivery Upgrades in Support of DFLAW Stoner, Ryan 1/8/18: Continuing to review scope of work for FY18 execution. February BCR will be processed to align PMB with path forward for the balance of the year. NTE forecast to exceed February this has been identified on TOC critical needs list for ORP CO to provide further increase. 12/11/17: Reviewing execution of AP-105 field work and initiation of AP-107 fabrication in light of all new direction for waste feed delivery. 4,000 20,425 CP-17-011 200-E-310/311 PL Transfer Lines Wood, Rob 12/11/17: Awaiting ORP review and subsequent provision of NTE prior to processing scope addition. 11/13/17: NTE will be requested following ORP proposal review, anticipate December request. 10/19/17: IQRPE of transfer line approved on buyback list for execution. 8/24/17: Proposal submitted to ORP. 8/14/17: Final schedule and cost revisions underway for submittal. 1,651 CP-17-004 Fire Protection Upgrades Jansen, Jeff 12/11/17: January BCR will be processed to add 222-S lab design for execution, further NTE need date will be assessed following addition. 8/24/17: Request for Proposal with submittal date of 12/20/17. 8/14/17: Included in FY18 all-in assessment. 7/24/17: To be included in all-in FY18 assessment. 500 TBD CP-17-017 Annulus Emergency Pumping Capability Follett, Jordan 12/11/17: January BCR will be processed for further design and fabrication initiation, further NTE need date will be assessed following addition. 12/11/17: January BCR will be processed for further design and fabrication initiation, further NTE need date will be assessed following addition. 11/13/17: Project actively working under $500K NTE limitation. 500 TBD CP-17-018 Cross Site Transfer Lines Qualification & Monitoring System May, Dustin 1/8/18: March BCR will be processed to add permanent power to 6241V, further NTE need date will be assessed following addition. 8/24/17: Request for Proposal with submittal date of 12/20/17. 8/14/17: Included in FY18 all-in assessment. 500 TBD CP-18-006 Waste Feed Delivery Tank Farm Upgades Ryan Stoner 1/8/18: Continuing to review scope of work for FY18 execution. February BCR will be processed to align PMB with path forward for the balance of the year. Capital determinations to be processed as operating expense and WRPS Prime Contracts will e-mail CO for confirmation on this designation. 12/11/17:December BCR will be processed to add initial design and site preparation field work. 11/13/17: Proposal kick off held 11/7/17, assessing path forward with impacts of revised LAWPS path forward. 5,000 TBD

ORP Review / Approval is or will be Required Further Not To Exceed Authorization will be Required Need for Contract Direction from ORP Developing Proposal

SLIDE 48

48

Tank Farm Projects Risk Status

December 2017

SLIDE 49

Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan December 2017

NUCON Diesel Unit Fabrication

SLIDE 50

50

Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Project Key Deliverables

December 2017 FY2018 Key Deliverables Target Forecast PBI-44.0.1: Complete Installation of Stack Monitoring in AW, AX (2), AN, and 702-AZ SEP 2018 SEP 2018 PBI-44.0.2: Compete Field Installation and Functional Testing of PA System in B, BX, BY, S, SX, SY, T, TX, TY, and U farms. SEP 2018 AUG 2018 PBI-44.0.3: Complete SST Automation Upgrades at TY Farm SEP 2018 JUL 2018 PBI-44.0.4: Complete NUCON Bench Scale Test and Summary Report SEP 2018 SEP 2018 PBI-44.0.5.1: Complete Initial Factory Acceptance Testing of Strobic Unit MAR 2018 MAR 2018 PBI-44.0.5.2: Complete Second Phase of Off-site Strobic Demonstration and Prepare Results Summary SEP 2018 SEP 2018 PBI-44.0.6: Complete Field Installation and Turnover AW Stack Extension to Operation SEP 2018 SEP 2018 PBI-44.0.7: Complete Six (6) Cartridge Testing Iterations SEP 2018 JUN 2018 Issue Quantitative Risk Analyses (QRA) for six (6) tank farms SEP 2018 SEP 2018

SLIDE 51

51

Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Project Performance Current Month/Fiscal Year

December 2017

FY End WBS BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV SPI CPI BAC FCST P EAC SVFCST VAC TCPI FCST P 5.01.05.11.01 - 1-SC1 - Plan for Tank Head Space Sample

6
6

6

9

5 9 4 0.58 5.01.05.11.09 - 9-DR1 - Head Space & Stack Sampling

2
2
504

364 504 140 1.39 5.01.05.11.33 - 33-RM6 - New Vapor Detection Technology

44

3 44 40

219

92 64 311 28 (0.42) 1.44

219

92 64 311 28

5.01.05.11.48 - CVAP Management Commitment

316 316 388

72

941 941 1,095

154

1.00 0.86 4,061 4,061 4,493

432

0.92 5.01.05.11.49 - New Vapor Detection Technologies 236 328 649 92

321

1,205 904 1,867

301
962

0.75 0.48 3,640 4,067 4,688 540

508

1.16 5.01.05.11.51 - Head Space & Stack Sampling

2

2 2

0.97

214 395 392 181 2 1.01 5.01.05.11.52 - Chemical Cartridge Evaluations 169 159 173

10
14

504 402 511

102
109

0.80 0.79 3,165 3,084 3,609

444

0.89 5.01.05.11.53 - Tank Farms PA Systems for Event Notification 749 400 496

349
96

1,068 641 790

427
148

0.60 0.81 3,295 4,001 4,157 720

142

1.00 5.01.05.11.54 - Chemical Vapor Engineered Control Upgrades 139 253 163 114 89 289 515 390 226 125 1.78 1.32 883 1,045 1,032 167 18 0.83 5.01.05.11.55 - AW Strobic Air Upgrade 64 177 29 113 148 191 219 36 28 183 1.15 6.13 2,576 2,866 2,901 290

36

0.92 5.01.05.11.56 - Vapor Monitoring & Detection System Upgrades 373 256 222

117

34 2,623 1,348 1,410

1,275
62

0.51 0.96 8,353 8,588 7,891 410 872 1.14 5.01.05.11.57 - Industrial Hygiene Trailer 210 12 39

198
27

359 52 93

307
42

0.14 0.55 1,871 2,130 2,141 258

12

1.01 5.01.05.11.58 - SST Stewardship Program 229 103 116

126
13

423 154 210

269
56

0.36 0.73 2,089 2,476 2,506 387

31

1.01 5.01.05.11.59 - NUCON Vapor Abatement 215 265 173 50 92 712 365 361

347

5 0.51 1.01 2,032 2,109 2,419 77

310

0.85 5.01.05.11.60 - CVAP 222-S Laboratory Upgrades 44 43 7

1

36 546 97 16

449

81 0.18 6.20 546 706 611 162 97 1.03 Total 2,744 2,355 2,458

389
103

8,641 5,738 6,846

2,903
1,108

0.66 0.84 32,506 36,131 37,274 4,015

753

1.01 Current Month FYTD

FYTD SV Forecast $4,015K :

FY17 Carryover Recovery
PA System: AP & C farm installation and testing
VMDS: AP farm equipment turnover
Head space: BY farm jig comparison testing
C2Sense Prototype development
Enhanced auto-sampler development
SST Stewardship: TY Automation design
702AZ, AN, AW, and AX Stack Monitors OAT & Turnover (-$297k)

FYTD CV Forecast -$753K :

VMDS: AP Turnover team smaller than planned as resources are shared between

several different scopes of work and VMDS Stack Monitor OAT & Turnover moved to FY19 ($872k) Offset by:

Chemical Cartridge: National Lab increased support to aid in cartridge testing

reports and development of future sampling strategy document (-$444k)

New Vapor Technologies: Increased vendor support to complete development of

enhanced auto-sampler. (-$244k) and ongoing Fowler support (-$264k)

CVAP Management Commitment: Increased off-site sampling costs related to

CVAP scopes of work and increased national laboratory support in CVAP Studies and Abatement scopes (-$432k)

NUCON Vapor Abatement: Higher than planned costs for off-site testing support

(-$310k)

SLIDE 52

52

Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Current Month Predominant Cost and Schedule Variances

December 2017

Current Month Schedule (-$389K) Current Month Cost (-$103K) 5.1.5.11.53 – Tank Farms PA System for Event Notification ($349k) Cause: The current-month unfavorable schedule variance is due to delay in the expected arrival of the PA system west area materials. The Material request for the remaining speaker poles, mounts, and batteries was completed on 12/5/18 and is expected to arrive on 2/15/18. Corrective Action: No corrective action required. Current-month variance. 5.1.5.11.49 – New Vapor Detection Technologies(-$321k) Cause: The current-month unfavorable cost variance is predominantly driven by greater than anticipated duration and associated cost for technical subcontract support for vapor monitoring and detection system support at AP pilot operations and over-arching technical support during design development of placement of VMDS equipment. Technical support contracts have been extended through January of FY18. The usage variance is a result of three additional months of support than originally planned. Project team is working to complete necessary turnover and procedural update tasks. Corrective Action: No corrective action required for current-month variance. 5.1.5.11.57 – Industrial Hygiene Trailer (-$198k) Cause: The current month unfavorable schedule variance results from delays completing 90% design of the ten-wide IHT trailer. The project team has spent greater than anticipated time developing trailer sketches, layouts, and site evaluations to meet the needs of the Industrial Hygiene group. IH needs have been established and will drive finalization of sketches to provide for 90% design of trailer. Corrective Action: No corrective action required. Current-month variance. 5.1.5.11.55 – AW Strobic Air Upgrade ($149k) Cause: The current month favorable cost variance is due to requiring less project management support than

expected. Contract is currently with vendor awaiting final submittals from the vendor.

Corrective Action: No corrective action required for current-month variance. 5.1.5.11.54 – Chemical Vapor Engineered Control Upgrades ($114k) Cause: The current-month favorable schedule variance is due to the schedule recovery of completing the 242-A Stack Extension Ammonia Analyzer. The Ammonia Analyzer has been installed and software has been implemented. Corrective Action: No corrective action required. Current-month variance.

SLIDE 53

53

Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Project Performance Cumulative to Date

December 2017 WBS BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV SPI CPI BAC TCPI 5.01.05.11.01 - 1-SC1 - Plan for Tank Head Space Sample 225 222 285

3
62

0.99 0.78 225 0.58 5.01.05.11.09 - 9-DR1 - Head Space & Stack Sampling 4,110 3,607 2,443

504

1,163 0.88 1.48 4,110 1.39 5.01.05.11.33 - 33-RM6 - New Vapor Detection Technology 17,613 17,613 16,767

846

1.00 1.05 17,613

5.01.05.11.48 - CVAP Management Commitment

5,651 5,651 6,117

466

1.00 0.92 8,771 0.92 5.01.05.11.49 - New Vapor Detection Technologies 8,704 7,863 9,982

840
2,119

0.90 0.79 11,139 1.16 5.01.05.11.51 - Head Space & Stack Sampling 190 11 14

179
3

0.06 0.79 404 1.01 5.01.05.11.52 - Chemical Cartridge Evaluations 5,629 5,527 5,115

102

412 0.98 1.08 8,290 0.89 5.01.05.11.53 - Tank Farms PA Systems for Event Notification 4,413 3,266 3,174

1,147

93 0.74 1.03 6,640 1.00 5.01.05.11.54 - Chemical Vapor Engineered Control Upgrades 1,396 1,455 1,973 59

518

1.04 0.74 1,991 0.83 5.01.05.11.55 - AW Strobic Air Upgrade 587 325 92

262

234 0.55 3.55 2,972 0.92 5.01.05.11.56 - Vapor Monitoring & Detection System Upgrades 4,372 2,390 3,399

1,982
1,010

0.55 0.70 10,102 1.10 5.01.05.11.57 - Industrial Hygiene Trailer 671 106 160

565
55

0.16 0.66 2,183 1.01 5.01.05.11.58 - SST Stewardship Program 884 229 247

656
18

0.26 0.93 2,550 1.01 5.01.05.11.59 - NUCON Vapor Abatement 1,228 804 785

424

20 0.65 1.03 2,548 0.85 5.01.05.11.60 - CVAP 222-S Laboratory Upgrades 730 119 26

611

93 0.16 4.63 730 1.03 Total 83,898 76,683 77,402

7,215
719

0.91 0.99 107,763 1.00 Cumulative to Date

SLIDE 54

54

Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Cumulative to Date Predominant Cost and Schedule Variances

December 2017

CTD Schedule (-$7,215K) CTD Cost (-$719K) 5.1.5.11.53 – Tank Farms PA System for Event Notification (-$1,147k) Cause: The contract-to-date unfavorable schedule variance is predominately driven by; 1) Delayed west area PA system procurements ($830k). The Material request for the remaining speaker poles, mounts, and batteries was completed on 12/5/17 and is expected to arrive on 2/15/18. 2)Delayed west area PA system reader boards ($133k). Reader boards have been ordered and are expected to arrive after a 12 week lead time on 3/5/18. 3) The delayed start of construction for the permanent public address system around the east area tank farms ($314k). The variance is caused by upfront design delays following a late contract award as upfront scoping agreements took longer than anticipated for east area farms. An Engineering change request was required for re-work of failed PA system batteries. Vendor has had insufficient resources to provide for field work activities. Work is on-going in AP & C farm and is expected to be completed by 1/30/18. Corrective Action: The Material request for the remaining speaker poles, mounts, and batteries was completed on 12/5/18 and is expected to arrive on 2/15/18. Reader boards have been ordered and are expected to arrive after a 12 week lead time on 3/5/18. 5.1.5.11.49 – New Vapor Detection Technologies (-$2,119k) Cause: The contract to date unfavorable cost variance is predominantly driven by greater than anticipated duration and associated cost for technical subcontract support for vapor monitoring and detection system support at AP pilot operations and over-arching technical support during design development of placement of VMDS equipment. Corrective Action: The project manager will continue to monitor need for technical subcontracts and work to scale back support as farms get closer to turnover to operations. 5.1.5.11.60 – CVAP 222-S Laboratory Upgrades (-$611k) Cause: The cumulative to date schedule variance is primarily due to the delayed procurement of the GC mass spectrometer. Subcontracting issues related to the procurement of the equipment have been resolved and the procurement contract has been issued with an anticipated receipt date of February. Installation and renovation activities will follow and are expected to begin in March. Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. Installation & Renovation activities are expected to conclude in August 5.1.5.11.9 – Head Space & Stack Sampling ($1,163k) Cause: The favorable contract-to-date variance is due to usage efficiencies attributed to field labor support usage and diminished Crane & Rigging support to Head Space & Exhaust Stack Sampling in FY16. After carrying out initial samples, it was determined that 1) Less than anticipated NCO's, IHT's, HPT's, and plant engineers are required to complete samples, 2) samples can be completed with less than originally planned Crane & Rigging support because the riser caps being accessed to perform sampling can be removed manually rather than requiring Crane & Rigging support as was initially planned, and 3) exhaust stack samples are able to be completed in tandem with head space samples utilizing the same crew. Corrective Action: No corrective action required. Cost variance is favorable and project anticipates continued efficiencies carrying out future samples. Anticipated savings are reflected in the EAC.

SLIDE 55

55

Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Cumulative to Date Predominant Cost and Schedule Variances

December 2017

CTD Schedule (-$7,215K) CTD Cost (-$719K) 5.1.5.11.49 – New Vapor Detection Technologies (-$840k) Cause: The contract-to-date unfavorable variance is driven by: 1)Delays in technical subcontract support for vapor monitoring and detection system over arching technical support during design development of placement of VMDS equipment. The activity delays were a result from multiple revisions of design development due to unforeseen complications and issues regarding placement

f VMDS equipment.

2)Delays in developing the enhanced auto sampler unit. Final design and procurement of necessary materials to develop the auto sampler required UV-DOAS equipment specifications which were unavailable until early October FY18 after stack monitor designs for AN, AW, and AZ were completed. Corrective Action: 1) Final work packages are being executed and closed out to finalize VMDS pilot testing technical subcontract support. Completion of these activities is anticipated in January FY17. 2) UV-DOAS equipment specifications have been received by vendor and being incorporated into the design

f the enhanced auto sampler unit. WRPS engineering are working closely with vendor to ensure proper

design inputs and materials are ordered. Procurements will be done in parallel and several sub-components

f the enhanced auto sampler will be FAT tested on an interim basis prior to a final integrated FAT in hopes

to resolve any potential issues early on in the process. 5.1.5.11.56 – Vapor Monitoring Detection System Upgrades (-$1,010k) Cause: The cumulative to date unfavorable cost variance is a labor usage variance resulting from more than anticipated design labor support due to a change in project strategy in order to meet the project milestone to complete three farms' design packages by the end of September FY17, specifically for AW, AN, and AZ stacks. Corrective Action: There are no corrective actions planned at the current time. The unfavorable variance is not anticipated to be fully recovered for design effort. 5.1.5.11.56 – Vapor Monitoring & Detection System Upgrades (-$1,982k) Cause: The cumulative to date unfavorable variance is driven by 1)Delayed receipt of fence-line monitoring equipment. Upfront procurement process and contract award to vendor was delayed to allow further time to finalize specifications for the equipment. Progress payments are being throughout procurement process. ($524k) 2)Delays in turnover procedural development and final OAT & Test Report development for AP Farm

readiness. ($897k)

3)AW farm stack monitor work package planning & field installation delayed awaiting final equipment specifications, functional requirements, and vendor QA resolution. ($375k) Corrective Action: 1) Identify and revise necessary procedures to integrate VMDR system into farm operations. Project manager is currently coordinating this effort with procedures organization. 2) Work package closeout for Pilot Scale Testing required prior to turnover of equipment. Engineering staff has been assigned to monitor and status closeout of each ECN and work package. 3) Project representatives will be sent to vendor location to support ongoing development of their quality assurance program to meet tank farm's needs. Following QA development and sign-off procurements can proceed. 5.1.5.11.33 – 33-RM6 New Vapor Detection Technology ($846k) Cause: The cumulative to date favorable cost variance is attributed to the following: 1) result of conversion of planned field installation and testing resources from plant forces direct labor to construction forces subcontract and 2) the utilization of less than anticipated support for the amount of work accomplished in September and October 2016 as testing normalized and focus shifted to report production. The cumulative to date favorable cost variance was partially offset by greater than anticipated subcontractor usage cost from the following: 1) the construction subcontractor support due to initial training requirements and greater than anticipated material needed for installation, 2) unanticipated usage cost from the construction subcontractor and the national laboratory for additional support needed to troubleshoot, calibrate, and integrate the software of new detection technology equipment, 3) ongoing greater than anticipated national laboratory usage cost in delivery of bench scale test report. Extended duration as a result

f delays in original equipment receipt led to increased cost and prolonged installation timeline and 4) Final

construction contractor CAL settlement and invoicing. Corrective Action: No corrective action required as this is a favorable cumulative to date cost variance.

SLIDE 56

56

Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Project Schedule Recovery

December 2017

Recovery Discussion

PA System ($1,147k):
Completion of AP & C farms
Reader Board receipt and Install
West Area equipment procurements
New Vapor Technology: Enhanced Auto-sampler

development ($395k)

VMDS AP farm Testing, Readiness, and Turnover

($897k)

VMDS fence-line monitors equipment receipt

($524k)

SST Automation ($656k): TY Farm Design
Head Space Sampling ($683k): Cartridge jig

validation testing & associated procurements.

Strobic Air ($262k): Strobic test plan and Strobic Air

support.

10-wide Trailer ($565k): 10-wide trailer procurement

and site design.

CVAP 222-S Lab Upgrades ($611k): Room 4S

equipment upgrade planning, design, and equipment receipt. CM Schedule Forecast Variance

PA System AP farm Installation: ECN

revision required prior to finalizing field work (-$49k)

Head Space Sampling comparison

testing setup (-$97k)

Ammonia Analyzer Phase II completion

($80k) EOY Schedule Forecast Variance

VMDS Stack Monitors OAT & turnover

into FY19

SLIDE 57

57

Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Project Schedule Recovery

December 2017

Recovery Discussion

Recovery SV: AP farm

equipment turnover in FM June

Fence-line monitor receipt in

March

Stack Monitor installation June

through September

EOY Variance: Stack Monitors

OAT & Turnover Recovery Discussion

Receipt of equipment in

January FY18. Field work to initiate in Q2 of FY18. Recovery Discussion

December Recovery SV:

AP/C farm completion in February

Receipt of West Area

procurements in February/March

SLIDE 58

58

Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Project Spend Plan

December 2017 December Delta: -$88K, -3.4%

Auto sampler development – Subcontractor procurement commitments that were not forecasted for December (-$94k)
Tank Farms PA System – ECN revision support and east area farms ongoing testing and speaker maintenance prior to turnover (-$60k)
Head Space Sampling – BY farm comparison testing setup to be completed in January ($74k)
Ammonia Analyzer Phase II – Less than anticipated support to complete Ammonia Analyzer software upgrade ($63k)
Strobic Air Testing – Less than anticipated vendor support following delay in initial submittals ($43k)

Spend Forecast: -$232K, -0.6%

AP farm turnover – Fowler construction and Ares design support extended through January 2018 ($195k)
702AZ, AN, AW, and AX Stack Monitors OAT and turnover to be completed in FY19 (-$504k)

PDN Delta: $ 231k

AP farm turnover – Fowler construction and Ares design support extended through January 2018 ($195k)
702AZ, AN, AW, and AX Stack Monitors OAT and turnover to be completed in FY19 (-$504k)

ACWP/ETC Oct-17 (4W) Nov-17 (5W) Dec-17 (4W) Jan-18 (4W) Feb-18 (4W) Mar-18 (5W) Apr-18 (4W) May-18 (5W) Jun-18 (4W) Jul-18 (4W) Aug-18 (5W) Sep-18 (5W) FY Spend Forecast PDN Target Delta Oct-17 1,617 2,931 3,287 3,775 3,828 6,084 3,702 3,279 2,610 2,642 2,152 1,985 37,892 Nov-17 1,617 2,771 2,546 3,366 3,633 4,683 3,624 4,063 4,016 2,857 2,330 2,064 37,570 Dec-17 1,617 2,771 2,458 3,102 3,999 4,771 3,147 4,526 4,080 3,008 2,053 1,807 37,338 37,570 231 Delta

1,264
160
88
232

Percentage

43.9%
5.4%
3.4%
0.6%

SLIDE 59

59

Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Project Accomplishments & Look Ahead

December 2017 Accomplishments December:

Delivery of C2Sense prototype devices
Completed Ammonia Analyzer Phase II Tie-in
Awarded Strobic Air equipment contract
Drafted AN Farm Basis of Design
Completed farm laser scans in support of QRA’s

Look Ahead January:

AW Stack Extension final design
AN farm Basis of Design
Complete NUCON Vapor Abatement Unit Final Test Plan
Install PA system in AP farm
Evaporator QRA/Basis of Design Approval

February:

Complete draft SST Stewardship Execution Strategy Document
Award Contract - AW Stack Extension Fabrication
Draft AN farm QRA
Draft AX and AY/AZ Basis of Designs
Complete AX farm stack monitor 60% design
BY-108 Cartridge Testing
Jig validation comparison head space sampling in BY farm
PA System turnover to Operations in A-complex
PA System West Area equipment procurements
Submit Final UV-DOAS Cerex Stack Monitor Design AN & AZ farms

March:

222S 4S Renovation Draft Design
10-wide IH Trailer 90% site design
Continued PAPR cartridge testing
PA System reader-boards receipt
CVAP 222-S Lab Upgrades receipt and field work kickoff
TY Farm Automation Design
Strobic Factory Acceptance Testing
NUCON diesel unit shipment and testing setup

SLIDE 60

60

Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Project Baseline Change Log

December 2017

BCR Number BCR Title Reporting Month BCR Level FY18 Total FY18 Baseline Running Total RPP-17-134 Fiscal Year 2018 Planning September FY17 2 46,068 $ 46,068 $ RPP-18-016 Move Phase I Autosampler Scope to UB October FY18 2 (219) $ 45,849 $ RPP-18-015 NUCON Vapor Abatement Propane Test and PTR-MS Re- plan October FY18 3 352 $ 46,201 $ RPP-18-054 AW Stack Extension Field Work January FY18 3 2,152 $ 48,353 $ 48,353 $ FY18 Total

SLIDE 61

61

Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Project Contract Change Log

December 2017

Title Project Manager BCR Level Status Total Impact ($K) Contract Change 105,221 FY17/18 105,221 CP-17-009 Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Gagnon, Paul

NTE increase to $47.3M received 10/31/17.
Proposal audit complete.
ERRATA submittal imminent.

105,221

SLIDE 62

62

Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Top Risk Items

December 2017

SLIDE 63

63

Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Top Risk Items

December 2017

SLIDE 64

64

Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Top Risk Items

December 2017

SLIDE 65

65

Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Top Risk Items

December 2017

SLIDE 66

LAWPS December 2017

SLIDE 67

67

LAWPS Overview

December 2017

FY End WBS BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV SPI CPI BAC EAC VAC TCPI FCST P BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV SPI CPI BAC TCPI 5.05.01.02.01 - E - LAWPS - Concept. Design - Project Management

1,030

1,030 970

60

1.00 1.06 1,030

5.05.01.02.02 - E - LAWPS - Concept. Design - Project Support
2,809

2,809 3,213

404

1.00 0.87 2,809

5.05.01.02.03 - E - LAWPS - Concept. Design - Permitting
160

160 57

103

1.00 2.82 160

5.05.01.02.04 - E - LAWPS - Concept. Design - Safety Analysis
7
7
7
7
689

689 648

41

1.00 1.06 689

5.05.01.02.05 - E - LAWPS - Concept. Design - Technology Matur.
816

816 495

321

1.00 1.65 816

5.05.01.02.06 - E - LAWPS - Concept. Design - Design
4,236

4,236 4,296

60

1.00 0.99 4,236

5.05.03.02.01 - P - LAWPS - Design Project Management (PM)

174 174 162

11

518 518 495

22

1.00 1.05 4,108 4,057 51 1.01 4,273 4,273 4,873

600

1.00 0.88 7,863 1.01 5.05.04.02.01 - P - LAWPS - Design - Project Support (PS) 584 447 416

137

31 1,707 1,354 1,424

354
70

0.79 0.95 3,633 3,918

286

0.80 12,904 12,526 15,296

377
2,769

0.97 0.82 14,829 0.92 5.05.05.01.01 - E - LAWPS - Permitting Dev., Prep & Reviews 19 13 25

6
12

56 38 91

18
52

0.69 0.42 111 186

75

0.68 1,320 1,293 923

27

370 0.98 1.40 1,375 0.86 5.05.06.02.01 - P - LAWPS - Design Safety Analysis 24 27 51 4

24

101 104 201 3

97

1.03 0.52 244 534

290

1.27 1,786 1,471 1,757

314
285

0.82 0.84 1,928 1.37 5.05.07.01.01 - P - LAWPS - Tech Maturation Program & Misc Tests 18 18 7

12

54 54 24

30

1.00 2.21 122 83 39 1.16 1,027 1,027 693

334

1.00 1.48 1,095 1.16 5.05.07.01.02 - P - LAWPS - Tech Mature. Integrated Scale Test 505 528 367 23 161 1,603 1,566 1,270

37

297 0.98 1.23 3,152 3,587

435

0.81 26,756 26,392 25,950

364

442 0.99 1.02 28,305 0.83 5.05.07.01.03 - P - LAWPS - Tech Maturation Full Scale Test 24

24
70
70
197

196 1 0.87 96

96
223

1.14 5.05.08.02.01 - P - LAWPS - Design System Integration 898

11
898

11 3,454 1,792 1,687

1,662

104 0.52 1.06 7,169 7,333

164

1.00 20,149 18,012 18,254

2,137
242

0.89 0.99 23,865 1.04 5.05.08.02.02 - P - LAWPS - Design Reagent Systems 34

34

173 61 100

112
38

0.35 0.62 471 600

129

1.00 1,154 951 834

203

117 0.82 1.14 1,452 1.00 5.05.08.02.03 - P - LAWPS - Design Primary Pretreat System 198

11
198
11

717 473 440

244

33 0.66 1.08 2,040 2,078

38

1.00 4,982 4,667 6,219

316
1,552

0.94 0.75 6,305 1.00 5.05.08.02.04 - P - LAWPS - Design HVAC System 34

34

266 257 143

8

115 0.97 1.81 775 808

33

1.00 2,042 1,886 2,102

156
216

0.92 0.90 2,552 1.00 5.05.08.02.05 - P - LAWPS - Design Solid Waste System 6

6

9

3

9
3

(0.00) (0.00) 85 86

2

1.00 299 291 102

8

189 0.97 2.86 374 1.00 5.05.08.02.06 - P - LAWPS - Design Balance of Plant System 366

4
366

4 1,053 313 568

740
255

0.30 0.55 3,409 3,999

590

1.00 6,861 5,786 7,423

1,075
1,637

0.84 0.78 9,217 1.00 5.05.08.02.07 - P - LAWPS - Design Facilities System 279

4
279
4

781 375 1,005

407
631

0.48 0.37 2,659 4,590

1,932

1.00 7,005 5,297 8,549

1,708
3,252

0.76 0.62 8,882 1.00 5.05.08.02.08 - P - LAWPS - Design Project Management & Support 1,416 672 1,140

745
469

2,646 1,832 2,222

814
390

0.69 0.82 8,751 9,368

616

0.97 17,343 16,495 16,788

849
293

0.95 0.98 23,449 0.97 5.05.08.02.09 - P - LAWPS - Build to Print

4
4

19 28 196 9

168

1.45 0.14 968 1,734

766

1.00 2,070 1,480 1,562

590
82

0.72 0.95 3,018 1.00 5.05.11.02.01 - P - LAWPS - Long Lead Procurements Design 811 1,036 1,002 225 34 2,148 2,342 2,438 194

96

1.09 0.96 3,840 4,769

929

0.79 6,718 6,346 6,204

373

142 0.94 1.02 8,411 0.89 Total 5,389 2,914 3,174

2,474
260

15,377 11,108 12,313

4,269
1,205

0.72 0.90 41,734 47,933

6,199

0.96 126,525 117,934 127,207

8,591
9,273

0.93 0.93 152,882 0.98 Current Month FYTD Cumulative to Date

SLIDE 68

68

LAWPS Schedule and Cost Forecast

December 2017

SLIDE 69

December 2017 69

LAWPS Current Month Variances

Schedule

5.5.4.2.1 P - LAWPS - Design - Project Support (PS) -$137k Cause: On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an

ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the previous LAWPS design. Following the External Expert Review, on November 16, 2017 WRPS received

Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the previous LAWPS

design. As a result, on November 29, 2017, WRPS terminated the subcontract previously established for Seismic Testing of the LAWPS Jumper Connectors. This

scope will reside in the project's PMB until a BCR is implemented to remove the associated remaining BCWS. Until then, unfavorable schedule variances will continue to be realized. Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan in support of an optimized LAWPS design. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect. 5.5.8.2.1 P - LAWPS - Design System Integration -$898k Cause: On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an

ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the previous LAWPS design. Following the External Expert Review, on November 16, 2017 WRPS received

Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the previous LAWPS

design. As a result, on November 20, 2017, WRPS issued a Stop Work Order to the Architect Engineer (A/E), requesting that they cease further progress of the

previous design. The current delay being experienced in this account is a direct result of the stop work. Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan in support of an optimized LAWPS design. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect.

SLIDE 70

70

LAWPS Overview

December 2017

FY End WBS BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV SPI CPI BAC EAC VAC TCPI FCST P BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV SPI CPI BAC TCPI 5.05.01.02.01 - E - LAWPS - Concept. Design - Project Management

1,030

1,030 970

60

1.00 1.06 1,030

5.05.01.02.02 - E - LAWPS - Concept. Design - Project Support
2,809

2,809 3,213

404

1.00 0.87 2,809

5.05.01.02.03 - E - LAWPS - Concept. Design - Permitting
160

160 57

103

1.00 2.82 160

5.05.01.02.04 - E - LAWPS - Concept. Design - Safety Analysis
7
7
7
7
689

689 648

41

1.00 1.06 689

5.05.01.02.05 - E - LAWPS - Concept. Design - Technology Matur.
816

816 495

321

1.00 1.65 816

5.05.01.02.06 - E - LAWPS - Concept. Design - Design
4,236

4,236 4,296

60

1.00 0.99 4,236

5.05.03.02.01 - P - LAWPS - Design Project Management (PM)

174 174 162

11

518 518 495

22

1.00 1.05 4,108 4,057 51 1.01 4,273 4,273 4,873

600

1.00 0.88 7,863 1.01 5.05.04.02.01 - P - LAWPS - Design - Project Support (PS) 584 447 416

137

31 1,707 1,354 1,424

354
70

0.79 0.95 3,633 3,918

286

0.80 12,904 12,526 15,296

377
2,769

0.97 0.82 14,829 0.92 5.05.05.01.01 - E - LAWPS - Permitting Dev., Prep & Reviews 19 13 25

6
12

56 38 91

18
52

0.69 0.42 111 186

75

0.68 1,320 1,293 923

27

370 0.98 1.40 1,375 0.86 5.05.06.02.01 - P - LAWPS - Design Safety Analysis 24 27 51 4

24

101 104 201 3

97

1.03 0.52 244 534

290

1.27 1,786 1,471 1,757

314
285

0.82 0.84 1,928 1.37 5.05.07.01.01 - P - LAWPS - Tech Maturation Program & Misc Tests 18 18 7

12

54 54 24

30

1.00 2.21 122 83 39 1.16 1,027 1,027 693

334

1.00 1.48 1,095 1.16 5.05.07.01.02 - P - LAWPS - Tech Mature. Integrated Scale Test 505 528 367 23 161 1,603 1,566 1,270

37

297 0.98 1.23 3,152 3,587

435

0.81 26,756 26,392 25,950

364

442 0.99 1.02 28,305 0.83 5.05.07.01.03 - P - LAWPS - Tech Maturation Full Scale Test 24

24
70
70
197

196 1 0.87 96

96
223

1.14 5.05.08.02.01 - P - LAWPS - Design System Integration 898

11
898

11 3,454 1,792 1,687

1,662

104 0.52 1.06 7,169 7,333

164

1.00 20,149 18,012 18,254

2,137
242

0.89 0.99 23,865 1.04 5.05.08.02.02 - P - LAWPS - Design Reagent Systems 34

34

173 61 100

112
38

0.35 0.62 471 600

129

1.00 1,154 951 834

203

117 0.82 1.14 1,452 1.00 5.05.08.02.03 - P - LAWPS - Design Primary Pretreat System 198

11
198
11

717 473 440

244

33 0.66 1.08 2,040 2,078

38

1.00 4,982 4,667 6,219

316
1,552

0.94 0.75 6,305 1.00 5.05.08.02.04 - P - LAWPS - Design HVAC System 34

34

266 257 143

8

115 0.97 1.81 775 808

33

1.00 2,042 1,886 2,102

156
216

0.92 0.90 2,552 1.00 5.05.08.02.05 - P - LAWPS - Design Solid Waste System 6

6

9

3

9
3

(0.00) (0.00) 85 86

2

1.00 299 291 102

8

189 0.97 2.86 374 1.00 5.05.08.02.06 - P - LAWPS - Design Balance of Plant System 366

4
366

4 1,053 313 568

740
255

0.30 0.55 3,409 3,999

590

1.00 6,861 5,786 7,423

1,075
1,637

0.84 0.78 9,217 1.00 5.05.08.02.07 - P - LAWPS - Design Facilities System 279

4
279
4

781 375 1,005

407
631

0.48 0.37 2,659 4,590

1,932

1.00 7,005 5,297 8,549

1,708
3,252

0.76 0.62 8,882 1.00 5.05.08.02.08 - P - LAWPS - Design Project Management & Support 1,416 672 1,140

745
469

2,646 1,832 2,222

814
390

0.69 0.82 8,751 9,368

616

0.97 17,343 16,495 16,788

849
293

0.95 0.98 23,449 0.97 5.05.08.02.09 - P - LAWPS - Build to Print

4
4

19 28 196 9

168

1.45 0.14 968 1,734

766

1.00 2,070 1,480 1,562

590
82

0.72 0.95 3,018 1.00 5.05.11.02.01 - P - LAWPS - Long Lead Procurements Design 811 1,036 1,002 225 34 2,148 2,342 2,438 194

96

1.09 0.96 3,840 4,769

929

0.79 6,718 6,346 6,204

373

142 0.94 1.02 8,411 0.89 Total 5,389 2,914 3,174

2,474
260

15,377 11,108 12,313

4,269
1,205

0.72 0.90 41,734 47,933

6,199

0.96 126,525 117,934 127,207

8,591
9,273

0.93 0.93 152,882 0.98 Current Month FYTD Cumulative to Date

SLIDE 71

71

LAWPS Schedule and Cost Forecast

December 2017

SLIDE 72

December 2017 72

LAWPS Current Month Variances

Schedule

5.5.4.2.1 P - LAWPS - Design - Project Support (PS) -$137k Cause: On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an

ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the previous LAWPS design. Following the External Expert Review, on November 16, 2017 WRPS received

Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the previous LAWPS

design. As a result, on November 29, 2017, WRPS terminated the subcontract previously established for Seismic Testing of the LAWPS Jumper Connectors. This

scope will reside in the project's PMB until a BCR is implemented to remove the associated remaining BCWS. Until then, unfavorable schedule variances will continue to be realized. Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan in support of an optimized LAWPS design. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect. 5.5.8.2.1 P - LAWPS - Design System Integration -$898k Cause: On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an

ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the previous LAWPS design. Following the External Expert Review, on November 16, 2017 WRPS received

Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the previous LAWPS

design. As a result, on November 20, 2017, WRPS issued a Stop Work Order to the Architect Engineer (A/E), requesting that they cease further progress of the

previous design. The current delay being experienced in this account is a direct result of the stop work. Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan in support of an optimized LAWPS design. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect.

SLIDE 73

December 2017 73

LAWPS Current Month Variances

Schedule

5.5.8.2.3 P - LAWPS - Design Primary Pretreat System -$198k Cause: On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an

ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the previous LAWPS design. Following the External Expert Review, on November 16, 2017 WRPS received

Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the previous LAWPS

design. As a result, on November 20, 2017, WRPS issued a Stop Work Order to the Architect Engineer (A/E), requesting that they cease further progress of the

previous design. The current delay being experienced in this account is a direct result of the stop work. Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan in support of an optimized LAWPS design. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect. 5.5.8.2.6 P - LAWPS – Design Balance of Plant System -$366k Cause: On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an

ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the previous LAWPS design. Following the External Expert Review, on November 16, 2017 WRPS received

Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the previous LAWPS

design. As a result, on November 20, 2017, WRPS issued a Stop Work Order to the Architect Engineer (A/E), requesting that they cease further progress of the

previous design. The current delay being experienced in this account is a direct result of the stop work. Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan in support of an optimized LAWPS design. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect.

SLIDE 74

December 2017 74

LAWPS Current Month Variances

Schedule

5.5.8.2.7 P - LAWPS - Design Facilities System -$279k Cause: On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an

ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the previous LAWPS design. Following the External Expert Review, on November 16, 2017 WRPS received

Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the previous LAWPS

design. As a result, on November 20, 2017, WRPS issued a Stop Work Order to the Architect Engineer (A/E), requesting that they cease further progress of the

previous design. The current delay being experienced in this account is a direct result of the stop work. Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan in support of an optimized LAWPS design. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect. 5.5.8.2.8 P - LAWPS – Design Project Management & Support -$745k Cause: On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an

ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the previous LAWPS design. Following the External Expert Review, on November 16, 2017 WRPS received

Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the previous LAWPS

design. As a result, on November 20, 2017, WRPS issued a Stop Work Order to the Architect Engineer (A/E), requesting that they cease further progress of the

previous design. The current delay being experienced in this account is a direct result of the stop work. Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan in support of an optimized LAWPS design. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect.

SLIDE 75

December 2017 75

LAWPS Current Month Variances

Schedule

5.5.11.2.1 - P - LAWPS – Long Lead Procurement Design $225k Cause: The CM SV is primarily due to the following:

The CM SV is primarily due to the completion of tasks planned in earlier reporting periods, Submittal of the preliminary design review package for the ASME Tanks,

$1,036k. These tasks are as follows: Vendor Submittal of the ASME Tanks Preliminary Design Review Package, Vendor Submittal of the Seismic and Safety Integrity Level (SIL) of the Xomox valves, and completion of component fabrication for Cross Flow Filter test and the associated testing/analysis. As the BCWS for these tasks resides in previous reporting periods, the performance earned in the current period contributes to this months favorable schedule variance.

The favorable variance is significantly offset by tasks supporting the design of the Xomox valves, submittal of the general assembly drawings for the CFF valves

which was completed in fiscal October but planned in the current period, -$400k. The other task being the Vendor Submittal of the 90% Design package for Xomox valves, which has been delayed as a result of the unplanned effort for the vendor to assemble and internally review the package prior to its submission to WRPS. - $400k. Impact: There is no impact to critical downstream activities as a result of this month's favorable schedule variance. The project team is in the planning stages of an

ptimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan in support of an optimized LAWPS design.

SLIDE 76

Cost

5.5.7.1.2 - P - LAWPS – Tech Mature. Integrated Scale Test $161k Cause: The CM CV is primarily due to the following:

Completing 8M testing activities more efficiently than planned. The corresponding Project Management oversight resources were required in the current period.
In addition, analytical analysis and sampling work was performed for less than planned.

Impact: There is no impact to any other activities outside of this account. 5.5.8.2.8 P - LAWPS –Design Project Management & Support -$469k Cause: The CM CV is primarily due to the following:

The effort for the Architect Engineer (A/E) to deliver all completed and partially completed work products following the stop work order issued to the A/E on

November 20, 2017. The stop work order followed Letter 17-TF-0096 – CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 – Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, received from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) on November 16,

2017. The effort to deliver all completed and partially completed work products, is unbudgeted and therefore all associated cost contributes to the current month’s

unfavorable variance, -$661k.

This variance is somewhat offset by a favorable variance in the effort to support planning and setup associated with an optimized LAWPS design, $203k. This can be

attributed to the A/E’s ability to support this effort with limited resources. Impact: The control account is forecasted to be overspent; however, costs associated with the effort to deliver all completed or partially completed work products is to be included in Contract Change Proposal 18-007 and the budgeted value of the control account will ultimately be increased by the value negotiated for this effort.

December 2017 76

LAWPS Current Month Variances

SLIDE 77

77

LAWPS CTD Variances

December 2017

Schedule

5.5.4.2.1 P - LAWPS – Design – Project Support (PS) -$377k Cause: The CTD SV is primarily due to the following:

On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an
ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the previous LAWPS design. Following the External Expert Review, on November 16, 2017 WRPS

received Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the previous LAWPS design. As a result, on November 29, 2017, WRPS terminated the subcontract previously established for Seismic Testing of the LAWPS Jumper Connectors, -$216k. This scope will reside in the project's PMB until a BCR is implemented to remove the associated remaining BCWS. Until then, unfavorable schedule variances will continue to be realized.

In addition, the CD-3A design package review and approval activity and IQRPE planning work has also been placed on hold as part of the replan, -$161k.

Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan in support of an optimized LAWPS design. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect. Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. 5.5.6.2.1 P - LAWPS – Design Safety Analysis -$314k Cause: The CTD SV is due to Flammable Gas Hazard Analysis of LAWPS Piping and Vessels. The Procurement process experienced a delay in the award of the subcontract due to clarifying scope with the subcontractor prior to award. In addition, the initial analysis was performed with assumed gas volumes and max postulated pressures which provided overly conservative results. WRPS then calculated actual pressures and gas volumes and requested a re-run of the analysis, -$276k. Impact: There is no impact to any activities outside of this account. It is anticipated that this work will be returned to Undistributed Budget on a BCR in January 2018. Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned.

SLIDE 78

78

LAWPS CTD Variances

December 2017

Schedule

5.5.7.1.2 P - LAWPS –Tech Mature. Integrated Scale Test -$364k Cause: The CTD SV is primarily due to the following:

Commencement of the revised Gas Retention and Release Testing was initially delayed due to availability of vendor (PNNL) resources. Although testing has now

started, the vendor is experiencing longer than anticipated durations due to the late start and continuing resource limitations (-$125k).

AECOM CFF foulant testing activities have been placed on hold pending formal direction from DOE regarding the LAWPS re-scoping effort. This activity will

contribute to the negative SV in this account until this work scope is removed from the baseline (-$218k). Impact: The PNNL and AECOM testing schedules do not currently have any CTD schedule impacts as the LAWPS design is progressing with preliminary data received from test results. Corrective Action: WRPS management will meet with the A/E responsible for the Preliminary Design to assess testing impacts from the GRS/Vented IX Column and

ther design changes. Once the impacts are determined, the project team will determine whether it is necessary to accelerate / recover schedule for the testing.

SLIDE 79

79

LAWPS CTD Variances

December 2017

Schedule

5.5.8.2.1 P - LAWPS –Design System Integration -$2,137k Cause: On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an

ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the previous LAWPS design. Following the External Expert Review, on November 16, 2017 WRPS received

Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the previous LAWPS

design. As a result, on November 20, 2017, WRPS issued a Stop Work Order to the Architect Engineer (A/E), requesting that they cease further progress of the

previous design. The current delay being experienced in this account is a direct result of the stop work; however, prior to the issuance of the stop work order the following drivers had contributed to the previous cumulative schedule variance, which are described below:

Delayed Process Engineering's progress of the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), Control and Alarm Set Point List, Design Basis Document, and two over
ne evaluations. Completion of the FMEA and the Control & Alarm Set Point lists have been re-sequenced in the current schedule to allow for the completion of

supporting documents which include the early publish of revision 2 P&IDs and HAZOP completion. Additionally, delayed progress of the development of the two over

ne evaluations are a result of additional time required to resolve issues with the seismic criteria of the facility and equipment.
Update to the current execution strategy by Instrumentation and Controls Engineering re-sequences the development and completion of the input/output (I/O) Lists,

Instrument Lists, Set Point Calculations, Instrument Uncertainty Analysis, and Control Logic Narratives to occur subsequent to the final publish of the revision 2 P&IDs, which is currently scheduled for early fiscal December. While the re-sequencing contributes to the overall CTD SV, the revised logic avoids the potential for future rework caused by differences between the P&IDs and design documents.

The extended effort around the Pipe Engineering's development of the Hydraulic Transient Analysis, which is due to unforeseen additional effort related to scope

growth and coordination meetings. Preparation of the associated calculations was planned for completion in latter part of fiscal August, per the current schedule, these tasks will now complete in fiscal November. The additional effort has slowed the progress of the calculations and contributes to the CTD SV.

Delayed progress of the A/E review of the P&IDs and PFDs. This delay is a result of the A/E's upfront extended effort to perform a more rigorous than planned

review of the P&IDs, in order to optimize the approach to the upcoming Inter-Disciplinary Review (IDR) of the process calculations and P&IDs. Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan in support of an optimized LAWPS design. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect. Corrective Action: The project team is developing a revised plan in support of an optimized LAWPS design. As the delays associated with the previous LAWPS design do not impact the execution of the optimized LAWPS, the project intends to re-baseline the LAWPS schedule, which will include setting all cumulative BCWS equal to cumulative BCWP and holistically re-planning the remaining activities. The target date for implementation of the revised plan is February 16, 2018, which will allow for the plan to be finalized in January and subsequently reviewed, approved, and implemented in fiscal February via a baseline change request (BCR).

SLIDE 80

80

LAWPS CTD Variances

December 2017

Schedule

5.5.8.2.3 P - LAWPS – Design Primary Pretreatment System -$316k Cause: On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an

ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the previous LAWPS design. Following the External Expert Review, on November 16, 2017 WRPS received

Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the previous LAWPS

design. As a result, on November 20, 2017, WRPS issued a Stop Work Order to the Architect Engineer (A/E), requesting that they cease further progress of the

previous design. The current delay being experienced in this account is a direct result of the stop work. Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan in support of an optimized LAWPS design. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect. Corrective Action: The project team is developing a revised plan in support of an optimized LAWPS design. As the delays associated with the previous LAWPS design do not impact the execution of the optimized LAWPS, the project intends to re-baseline the LAWPS schedule, which will include setting all cumulative BCWS equal to cumulative BCWP and holistically re-planning the remaining activities. The target date for implementation of the revised plan is February 16, 2018, which will allow for the plan to be finalized in January and subsequently reviewed, approved, and implemented in fiscal February via a baseline change request (BCR).

SLIDE 81

81

LAWPS CTD Variances

December 2017

Schedule

5.5.8.2.6 P - LAWPS - Design Balance of Plant System -$1,075k Cause: On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an

ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the previous LAWPS design. Following the External Expert Review, on November 16, 2017 WRPS received

Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the previous LAWPS

design. As a result, on November 20, 2017, WRPS issued a Stop Work Order to the Architect Engineer (A/E), requesting that they cease further progress of the

previous design. The current delay being experienced in this account is a direct result of the stop work; however, prior to the issuance of the stop work order the following drivers had contributed to the previous cumulative schedule variance, which are described below:

In June of fiscal year 2017, an imminent change to the current design was recognized based on results of the project's integrated testing. The Integrated Project

Team made the decision that the current design related to the Gas Removal System (GRS) would be replaced with Vented Ion Exchange Columns (VIXC) and additionally incorporate other essential changes required for 90% design completion. Following this decision, the project team identified urgent tasks to be performed in support of the design changes and implemented the associated scope, schedule, and budget into the PMB via BCR RPP-17-159 - LAWPS Implementation of Stage 1 GRS to Vented IX Design. Amongst these urgent tasks was the effort to revise the Balance of Plant (BOP) 3D model, which allowed the A/E to commence work while the balance of the revised execution strategy was developed. As the execution strategy matured it was evident that revisions to the BOP 3D model would require additional effort. This revised strategy has now been fully implemented via BCR RPP-17-171 - LAWPS GRS to VIXC and Essential Changes for 90% (Phase 2) and the current schedule now reflects the appropriate durations and inputs required to complete the extended effort to revise the BOP 3D Model.

Delays to Electrical Engineering drawings as a result of the incorporation of changes from the revision 2a P&IDs. The P&IDs drive the Input/output (I/O) lists, which

are required to complete the wiring diagrams and schematics

The preparation of the Safety Integrity Level (SIL) Calculations, and Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) were re-sequenced in the current schedule to

incorporate impacts for revision 8 of specification 58553 and to include updates associated with the afore mention revised execution strategy Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan in support of an optimized LAWPS design. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect. Corrective Action: There is no corrective action as a result of the CTD SV as there is no impact to key deliverable dates. Execution of the current schedule will facilitate CD 2/3 package delivery as planned.

SLIDE 82

Schedule

5.5.8.2.7 P - LAWPS - Design Facilities System -$1,708k Cause: On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an

ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the previous LAWPS design. Following the External Expert Review, on November 16, 2017 WRPS received

Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the previous LAWPS

design. As a result, on November 20, 2017, WRPS issued a Stop Work Order to the Architect Engineer (A/E), requesting that they cease further progress of the

previous design. The current delay being experienced in this account is a direct result of the stop work; however, prior to the issuance of the stop work order the following drivers had contributed to the previous cumulative schedule variance, which are described below:

Activities supporting the Earth Retaining System (ERS) were placed on hold as intermediate design changes are vetted to avoid unnecessary rework around the
ERS. In the interim, the associated delay contributes to the CTD SV.
Structural Engineering's effort to prepare calculations for Ventilation Stack, Backup Exhauster, De-ionized Water Foundations, and Reagent Tank Access Platform

has been extended. The extended duration of these tasks is attributed to waiting for building layout to be finalized, resource availability, and necessary design inputs. The extended duration has delayed the start of downstream checking and review activities as well as related drawings, which all contribute to the CTD SV.

In June of fiscal year 2017, an imminent change to the current design was recognized based on results of the project's integrated testing. The Integrated Project

Team made the decision that the current design related to the Gas Removal System (GRS) would be replaced with Vented Ion Exchange Columns (VIXC) and additionally incorporate other essential changes required for 90% design completion. Following this decision, the project team identified urgent tasks to be performed in support of the design changes and implemented the associated scope, schedule, and budget into the PMB via BCR RPP-17-159 - LAWPS Implementation of Stage 1 GRS to Vented IX Design. Amongst these urgent tasks was the effort to prepare the Facilities Balance of Plant (BOP) and Primary Pretreatment System (PPS) 3D model, which allowed the A/E to commence work while the balance of the revised execution strategy was developed. As the execution strategy matured it was evident that the effort to revise the BOP and PPS 3D model would require additional time. This revised strategy has now been fully implemented via BCR RPP- 17-171 - LAWPS GRS to VIXC and Essential Changes for 90% (Phase 2) and the current schedule now reflects the appropriate durations and inputs required to complete the extended effort to revise the BOP and PPS 3D Model.

Changes to the execution strategy of the weather enclosure, design vault, and miscellaneous steel activities are a result of the incorporation of the A/E's structural

subcontractor scope responsible for the Soil-Structure Interaction (SSI) initial model run and corresponding data extract. The receipt of the data was worked into the current schedule, which resulted in delays to downstream activities related to Weather Enclosure Calculations, Lag Storage Calculations/Drawings, and Design Vault Calculations. Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan in support of an optimized LAWPS design. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect. Corrective Action: The project team is developing a revised plan in support of an optimized LAWPS design. As the delays associated with the previous LAWPS design do not impact the execution of the optimized LAWPS, the project intends to re-baseline the LAWPS schedule, which will include setting all cumulative BCWS equal to cumulative BCWP and holistically re-planning the remaining activities. The target date for implementation of the revised plan is February 16, 2018, which will allow for the plan to be finalized in January and subsequently reviewed, approved, and implemented in fiscal February via a baseline change request (BCR).

82

LAWPS CTD Variances

December 2017

SLIDE 83

83

LAWPS CTD Variances

December 2017

Schedule

5.5.8.2.8 P - LAWPS – Design Project Management & Support -$849k Cause: On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an

ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the previous LAWPS design. Following the External Expert Review, on November 16, 2017 WRPS received

Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the previous LAWPS

design. As a result, on November 20, 2017, WRPS issued a Stop Work Order to the Architect Engineer (A/E), requesting that they cease further progress of the

previous design. The current delay being experienced in this account is a direct result of the stop work. Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan in support of an optimized LAWPS design. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect. Corrective Action: The project team is developing a revised plan in support of an optimized LAWPS design. As the delays associated with the previous LAWPS design do not impact the execution of the optimized LAWPS, the project intends to re-baseline the LAWPS schedule, which will include setting all cumulative BCWS equal to cumulative BCWP and holistically re-planning the remaining activities. The target date for implementation of the revised plan is February 16, 2018, which will allow for the plan to be finalized in January and subsequently reviewed, approved, and implemented in fiscal February via a baseline change request (BCR). 5.5.8.2.9 P - LAWPS - Build to Print -$590k Cause: The project team is developing a revised plan in support of an optimized LAWPS design. As the delays associated with the previous LAWPS design do not impact the execution of the optimized LAWPS, the project intends to re-baseline the LAWPS schedule, which will include setting all cumulative BCWS equal to cumulative BCWP and holistically re-planning the remaining activities. The target date for implementation of the revised plan is February 16, 2018, which will allow for the plan to be finalized in January and subsequently reviewed, approved, and implemented in fiscal February via a baseline change request (BCR).

The majority of Build to Print (BTP) work scope was put on hold while the re-plan associated with the change from the Gas Removal System (GRS) to the Vented Ion

Exchange (VIXC) was planned and implemented. The current BTP plan needed to be re-worked to allow for incorporation of the associated changes and other imminent design changes. As a result, progress was limited on the activities identified as being affected by the changes. Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan in support of an optimized LAWPS design. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect. Corrective Action: The project team is developing a revised plan in support of an optimized LAWPS design. As the delays associated with the previous LAWPS design do not impact the execution of the optimized LAWPS, the project intends to re-baseline the LAWPS schedule, which will include setting all cumulative BCWS equal to cumulative BCWP and holistically re-planning the remaining activities. The target date for implementation of the revised plan is February 16, 2018, which will allow for the plan to be finalized in January and subsequently reviewed, approved, and implemented in fiscal February via a baseline change request (BCR).

SLIDE 84

Schedule

5.5.8.2.7 P - LAWPS – Long Lead Procurements Design -$373k Cause: The CTD SV is primarily due to delays associated with the vendor submittal of the 90% Xomox valve design review package, -$400k. This task has been delayed as a result of the unplanned effort for the vendor to assemble and internally review the package prior to its submission to WRPS. This represents a 3 week delay in the current schedule and as this subcontract was planned to support a milestone payment schedule, all associated BCWP will be earned upon receipt of the submittal. Impact: There is no to critical downstream activities as a result of this delay. Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned.

84

LAWPS CTD Variances

December 2017

SLIDE 85

Cost

5.5.3.2.1 P - LAWPS - Design Project Management (PM) -$600k Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to:

Labor rates. The actual average hourly rates experienced for all labor resources exceeds the hourly rate used for planning/estimating the work scope by

approximately $10/hr, -$456k.

Labor usage. The actual hours experienced to date are greater than the realized calendar hours used to plan/estimate the work. These resources have not taken

paid time off consistent with the planned allocation allowance used to calculate the annual realized hours (actual hours experienced are 1,371 hours greater than planned), -$103k. Impact: There is no impact to any other activities or accounts outside of this account. Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. 5.5.4.2.1 P - LAWPS - Design - Project Support (PS) -$2,769k Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to:

Labor usage. Additional resources have been retained to increase the quality and completeness of the preliminary design as the project progresses towards
construction. In addition, the personnel performing the work are senior level individuals and were assigned to the project based on their experience and knowledge.

These resources have not taken paid time off consistent with the planned allowance used to calculate the annual realized hours. The number of actual hours experienced is greater than the hours utilized for planning the work scope by approximately 14,874 hours, -$1,628k.

Labor rates. The actual average hourly rates experienced for all labor resources exceeds the hourly rate used for planning/estimating the work scope by

approximately $6/hr, -$631k. Impact: There is no impact to any other activities outside of this account. Corrective Action: No corrective action is planned at this time. 5.5.5.1.1 E - LAWPS –Design Safety Analysis -$314k Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to:

The Procurement process experienced a delay in the award of the subcontract due to clarifying scope with the subcontractor prior to award. In addition, the initial

analysis was performed with assumed gas volumes and max postulated pressures which provided overly conservative results. WRPS then calculated actual pressures and gas volumes and requested a re-run of the analysis, -$153k

Labor rates. The actual average hourly rates experienced for all labor resources exceeds the hourly rate used for planning/estimating the work scope by

approximately $15/hr, -$182k.

Labor usage. The CTD CV is partially offset by labor and Staff Aug resource usage to support performance of Safety Analysis activities. Initially, Staff Aug resources

were planned to perform a significant portion of the safety activities. However, it was subsequently determined that the direct safety labor resources, with historical knowledge and experience of the project, would perform these activities $83k. Impact: There is no impact to any activities outside of this account. Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned.

85

LAWPS CTD Variances

December 2017

SLIDE 86

Cost

5.5.7.1.1 P - LAWPS - Tech Maturation Program & Misc Tests $334k Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to the following:

To date, the engineering support required to oversee performance of subcontracted national laboratory support has been less than planned. The national

laboratories (SRNL and PNNL) have extensive historical knowledge and experience with the subcontracted work scope and the WRPS Technology Maturation personnel, which allows them to perform the work scope efficiently with reduced oversight, $142k.

In comparison to the original plan for the sRF-3 testing and the final subcontract award, the engineering design was further developed and refined. This resulted in

some experienced efficiencies during the testing phase, $183k. There is no change to the variance drivers from the prior reporting period. Impact: There is no impact to any other activities outside of this account. Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. The variance is favorable and does not require any corrective actions at this time. 5.5.7.1.2 P - LAWPS - Tech Mature. Integrated Scale Test $442k Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to the following:

The account is experiencing labor price/usage efficiencies. Originally, staffing levels were assumed and planned at a higher level to provide oversight and support to

the Integrated Engineering-Scale test. Project Manager and Project Controls support were planned under this account. However, this support has been provided by resources already assigned to the project under the Project Management account. Also, the actual hourly rate experienced in this account for engineering support/oversight is less than the planning rate by approximately $16/Hr, $757k

The actual cost for resin procurements was significantly less than planned. Originally, resin was planned to be procured in two batches. The quantity of required

resin required was reduced to 500 gallons based on the refined needs of the project, $490k.

National Laboratory Technology Maturation program testing and oversight has experienced a negative cost variance that was driven by revisions to the test plan.

The biggest impact was caused by a change in the design to eliminate the Hydrogen Diffusion Design Feature (HDDF) and provide a standby, on demand, vessel ventilation for flammable gas mitigation, -$878k.

Additional labor and material costs incurred at both the Full-Scale and the Integrated Test Facility during checkout and commissioning were driven by unplanned

modifications to the column designs, re-assembly, and leak-testing before the initial tests could be re-started. The costs also include tank nozzle modifications and hotel costs for the PM and Operators at the Integrated Test Facility. In addition, the cost for the 1/9 Scale Integrated test planned equipment is greater than

estimated. Procurement of unplanned equipment was required to support the test program and associated unplanned fabrication/installation labor costs have been

experienced. Impact: The cumulative CV is unrecoverable and has been factored into the EAC. Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned.

86

LAWPS CTD Variances

December 2017

SLIDE 87

Cost

5.5.8.2.3 P - LAWPS - Design Primary Pretreat System -1,552k Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to the following:

To date the modeling effort required more resources than planned. This is attributed to the extensive comment incorporation from the 30% design reviews as well as

the preparation of story boards and a model fly through, which was unplanned. The model was matured to higher level of detail than planned and prepared to be free from clashes, in support of the accelerated 60% design requirements. Additionally, options for above grade maintenance access for the lag storage tanks and pipe routing changes around the Lag Storage area were required to satisfy facility construction requirements.

Studies/Calculations variance is due to pipe stress and process engineering requiring more effort because of the inefficiencies associated with concurrent

development of P&IDs, mechanical design, and piping design. Further variance in pipe stress was caused by the effort required to develop pipe stress design basis criteria for safety related systems (including seismic requirements and PUREX nozzle qualifications including TFC-ENG-DESIGN-C-60 requirements). Additional hours were spent developing a rationale presentation to WRPS for design justification for backpressure requirements for the filtration calculations, which was not included in the original estimate. The lag storage calcs required additional effort beyond what was estimated due to specification changes that were made after completion of advanced conceptual design. Process equipment calculations for mechanical design and piping were inefficient due to multiple iterations required to complete the 30% Delta Design Review package.

The Ion Exchange (IX) and Cross-Flow Filter (CFF) packages required additional hours to advance beyond what was planned. Drawing activities were performed to

support the 30% delta review packages and the completion of the long lead procurement packages that are required to meet the September 2016 PBI milestone. Additional unplanned hours to perform these activities were incurred to ensure the milestone date would be met. In addition, a greater than planned effort was required to provide the drawings necessary to present the high level of detail that is going to be included in the 60% package (300+ mechanical drawings). Additional resources were required to ensure the 60% part A completion date was achieved and IDR comments had to be addressed as they were received rather than on complete closure of the IDR cycle. Impact: On November 16, 2017 WRPS received Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the current LAWPS design. As a result, on November 20, 2017, WRPS issued a Stop Work Order to the Architect Engineer (A/E), requesting that they cease further progress of the current design. This account will not be impacted by further charges. Corrective Action: The variance is not recoverable and is reflected in the EAC.

87

LAWPS CTD Variances

December 2017

SLIDE 88

Cost

5.5.8.2.6 P - LAWPS – Design Balance of Plant System -$1,637k Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to the following:

Electrical specification, drawing, and modeling efforts have been accelerated to support the project schedule. The effort for specification development has been

impacted by the iterative process required on the procurement and quality sections of the specifications. Additional unplanned effort to complete electrical drawings has been realized as a result of new design requirements and the need for more design drawings. Additionally, the Electrical Engineering effort for the Hazardous Area Classification required more effort than planned to address review comments and different base assumptions.

On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an
ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the current LAWPS design. As a result, progress on the current design was slowed and on November 20,

2017 a Stop Work Order was issued to the Architect Engineer directing them to cease work on all current design in accordance with Letter 17-TF-0096 – CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 – Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, received from U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) on November 16, 2017. The majority of the inefficiencies in the current period were due to the slowdown of design activity, and the A/E not being able to ramp down staff as quickly as the work slowed. This was due to both WRPS and the A/E knowing the stop work was forthcoming, but officially not received until later in the month. WRPS worked with ORP and the A/E to stop the work as quickly as possible, it was a detailed process and significant considerations needed to be worked through. This took some time to ensure it was communicated appropriately, thus the costs continued until the official notice was delivered.

The BOP Controls Specs, Control System Spec, Safety System Spec, and developing the CSI spec format and requirements have been impacted by the redefinition
f the quality requirements. This change in formatting has caused unplanned specification rework to meet the new format requirements.
Development of the SIL/FMEA calculations contributes to the unfavorable cost variance. Several activities have required effort beyond what was initially planned

because more complex analysis has been required. In addition, higher costs have been realized due to additional resource ramping up and increased effort to perform the work. The original estimate was for 6 Safety Integration Functions (SIFs), and through the development of the design, there are now 19 SIFs that are factored into the calculations requiring more time and effort to complete.

Control drawings have been revised multiple times and continue to be updated. Control cabinet and room layouts have been revised to address additional space

requirements for elevated I/O counts. Impact: No further impact is expected since the stop work order has been issued. Corrective Action: No corrective action planned. As mentioned above, a Stop Work Order was issued to the A/E on November 20, 2017, stopping all further charges to this control account. The project team is now developing a revised plan in support of the optimized LAWPS design, which is targeted for implementation by the end of fiscal January 2018.

88

LAWPS CTD Variances

December 2017

SLIDE 89

Cost

5.5.8.2.7 P - LAWPS - Design Facilities System -$3,252k Cause: The CTD CV is due to:

Weather Enclosure Structural calculations and seismic analysis (SSI) activities performed by subcontractor SGH, Vault Concrete calculations, Vault Steel

calculations, and Cell Cover calculations started late due to contract negotiations that resulted in cost and schedule impacts caused by the tightly compressed

schedule. The subcontract award to SGH was significantly higher than the A/E baseline estimate for the work scope. Additionally, vault steel, vault cover, and vault

concrete calculations all went through multiple iterations as equipment arrangements matured and ensure alignment with the concrete substructure.

Additional effort for Architectural drawings has been required due the significant coordination required with the other engineering disciplines and with SGH, as their

designs have matured and changes are needed to the architectural model and drawings.

Architectural specifications for the Weather Enclosure involved a larger number of specs than originally anticipated and the Change Facility experienced significant

changes due to requests made during the WRPS design reviews to accommodate operational and radiation protection needs.

3D modeling activities went through a number of iterations in order to synchronize the SGH model with the A/E structural vault model and the integrated A/E Smart

Plant model.

Additional effort for Structural drawings has been required due to the need to align the initial vault designs with the SGH design of the upper weather enclosure

structures and to perform the weather enclosure structure drawings. Impact: On November 16, 2017 WRPS received Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the current LAWPS design. As a result, on November 20, 2017, WRPS issued a Stop Work Order to the Architect Engineer (A/E), requesting that they cease further progress of the current design. This account will not be impacted by further charges. Corrective Action: The variance is not recoverable and is reflected in the EAC. 5.5.8.2.8 P – LAWPS – Design Project Management & Support -$293k Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to the effort for the Architect Engineer (A/E) to deliver all completed and partially completed work products following the stop work

rder issued to the A/E on November 20, 2017. The stop work order followed Letter 17-TF-0096 – CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 – Direction to Suspend

Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, received from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP)

n November 16, 2017. The effort to deliver all completed and partially completed work products, is unbudgeted and therefore all associated cost contributes to the

current month’s unfavorable variance, -$823k. This variance is somewhat offset by a favorable variance achieved in the A/E's Project Management and Support of the previous LAWPS design where their management and project support functions were able to effectively engage their teams utilizing less resources than planned, $327k. The unfavorable variance is additionally offset by the more recent effort to support planning and setup associated with an optimized LAWPS design, $203k. This can be attributed to the A/E’s ability to support this effort with limited resources. Impact: The control account is forecasted to be overspent; however, costs associated with the effort to deliver all completed or partially completed work products is to be included in Contract Change Proposal 18-007 and the budgeted value of the control account will ultimately be increased by the value negotiated for this effort. Corrective Action: As part of the Letter 17-TF-0096, WRPS was requested to provide a contract change proposal. The effort to develop contract change proposal 18- 007 is underway and is currently due by March 02, 2018. The effort associated with the delivery of all completed or partially completed work products is to be captured in this proposal and later negotiated.

89

LAWPS CTD Variances

December 2017

SLIDE 90

90

LAWPS Challenges/Issues/Opportunities

December 2017

Challenges

Integration of LAWPS with TSCR, storage pads and AP Farm Upgrades work scope and permitting.

Issues

WDOE continues to desire that the HVAC system be included in the RCRA Permit and tank vapor

abatement be deployed which could lead to significant design changes. Opportunities

Inclusion of concrete work in the CD-3A Package.

SLIDE 91

91

LAWPS Contract Changes / BCR Log

December 2017

Contract Changes / NTE Status BCR Status

Contract Changes Assigned Date Tech Lead Target Completion Estimated Impact ($M) Current Status

DOE-EM Review CP-17-033 18-Sep-17

C. Burke

TBD $0.2M

RPP-17-171 implemented the scope of the proposal into the

baseline in September 2017.

NTE increased from 200k to 270k via e-mail from Contracting

Officer dated 10/05/17. LAWPS RFP CP-18-007 11-Nov-17

C. Burke

TBD $19.0M

Actual costs and NTE value from CP-17-008 and CP-17-031

have been moved to this proposal per ORP.

RPP-18-030 implemented one month of budget to cover A/E

efforts for planning & project setup.

RPP-18-045 implemented to add another month of budget to

cover A/E efforts for planning & project setup.

RPP-18-061 to be implemented to add budget for WRPS labor

support, A/E near-term design tasks, and site civil survey.

BCR#/Description Level CAM Target Completion Estimated Impact Current Status

RPP-18-030: Optimized LAWPS Project Planning and Concept Development (Phase 1) 3 Tom Sackett October 2017 $303k BCR processed and implemented for October reporting. RPP-18-045: Optimized LAWPS Project Re-planning (Phase 2) 3 Jeff Filip Tom Sackett November 2017

$8,997k

BCR to processed and implemented for December reporting. RPP-18-061: Optimized LAWPS Project Re-planning (Phase 3) 2 Jeff Filip Tom Sackett January 2017 $7,421k BCR to be processed/approved in January and to be implemented for February reporting.

SLIDE 92

Chief Technology Office & Closure December 2017

Alternate Retrieval End Effector Fabrication Testing DFLAW Radioactive Waste Test Platform LAWPS Engineering-Scale Integrated Test Platform ILAW Glass Samples

SLIDE 93

93

Chief Technology Office & Closure Overview

December 2017

SLIDE 94

94

Chief Technology Office & Closure Schedule Recovery

December 2017

Cumulative to Date SV Forecast

SLIDE 95

95

Chief Technology Office & Closure Major Current Month Variances

December 2017

Cost

Nothing to report.

SLIDE 96

96

Chief Technology Office & Closure Major Current Month Variances

December 2017

Schedule

5.03.12.02.03 Liquid Secondary Waste Stream Tech Mat (DFLAW) -$124k

Cause: The CM SV is primarily due to the EMF Bottoms leachate testing was originally planned to perform to EPA standard 1313 (28 day duration). It was subsequently

determined that additional testing needed to be performed to EPA standard 1315 (63 day duration) to obtain adequate, meaningful data. The testing to EPA standard 1315 will require additional analysis. Additionally, agreement as to the contracting method/procurement process for Los Alamos National Lab (LANL) (EMF glass and simulant testing work scope) and Savannah River National Lab (SRNL) (EMF Concentrate IX testing) has not been reached resulting in delays to the award of these subcontracts.

Impact: No impact to critical path or other control accounts.

5.02.01.04.10 Interim Barriers (TBD FARMS) -$122k

Cause: The CM SV is due to (1) not being able to proceed with the barrier 3 (TX Tank Farm Barrier) design as planned, because WRPS is awaiting a decision from DOE &

Ecology on the size of the area of the TX Tank Farm to be covered. The baseline is for a barrier to cover 6 tanks, but discussions between DOE & Ecology could possibly increase the size to cover 18 tanks. Some of the design work is being done, but the majority of the design work cannot proceed until this information is received from DOE/Ecology, and (2) the SX Barrier Expansion design scope is being worked to a newly re-planned schedule.

Impact: (1) Work on the barrier 3 (TX Tank Farm) will be delayed until DOE & Ecology decides on the area to be covered. A decision is expected by JAN 31 18. (2) The CM

negative SV for the SX Expansion design, is not impacting future scope or scope outside of this account. The work is being executed to a newly re-planned schedule, but still expected to finish on time, in fiscal month MAY 18. 5.03.12.02.04 Solid Secondary Waste Stream Tech Mat (DFLAW) -$120k

Cause: The CM SV is primarily due to the agreement as to the contracting method/procurement process for Savannah River National Lab (SRNL) (Maturation and analysis of

Waste forms for disposal of Secondary Solid Wastes generated by DFLAW) has not been reached resulting in delays to the award of these subcontracts.

Impact: No impact to critical path or other control accounts.

SLIDE 97

97

Chief Technology Office & Closure Major Contract to Date Variances

December 2017

Cost

5.03.12.02.01 Technology Development $3,177k

Cause: The CTD CV is due to the following: 1) Labor usage efficiencies in FY 14. At the beginning of FY 14, a significant portion of scope was not authorized. As a result,

labor resources were redirected to other project accounts. In Jun 14, the afore-mentioned scope was authorized and implemented into the baseline. However, the reinstatement of staff to the project was slower than expected due to completion of reassigned work. 2) SRNL actual costs under Inter Entity Work Order (IEWO) contracts were not processed through TOC financial systems, which resulted in a favorable cost variance. 3) Labor usage efficiencies experienced in FY 15 in the LOE account for Technology Development and Program Management. 4) PNNL subcontract labor usage and price efficiencies under the Low Temperature Waste Form account were realized in FY 15. This is a result of their historic knowledge and expertise of the work scope.

Impact: No impact to the project. The SRNL IEWO contracts (IEWO = BCWS, BCWP without ACWP) will cause a final favorable CTD variance.
Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance.

5.02.04.02.03 - RCRA Closure Plan Updates $2,205k

Cause: The CTD CV is due to labor & subcontractor resource efficiencies. Internal subject matter experts were used, instead of additional subcontractor support, to develop

the TPA Closure Plans (Tier 1, 2, & 3), WIR, and DOE 435.1 Closure Plan. Realignment of internal resources supporting multiple activities within the organization resulted in labor utilization efficiencies. Also, comments received from ORP required fewer document revisions than planned. multiple activities within the organization resulted in labor utilization efficiencies. Also, comments received from ORP required fewer document revisions than planned.

Impact: Using internal subject matter expert support has resulted in an overall cost savings for the TPA Tier 1, 2, and 3 Closure Plans, WIR development, and DOE 435.1

Closure Plan development. Cost efficiencies have been accounted for in the EAC.

Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance.

5.03.06.01.04 IDF Glass Testing $1,945k

Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to the following 1) Subcontract resources provided by Pacific Northwest National Lab (PNNL) experienced usage efficiencies due to their

historical knowledge and expertise of the IDF Glass Testing Program, FYs 14 - 16, and FY 17. 2) WRPS labor resource usage in FY 14 was less than the planned baseline for oversight/management of the IDF Glass Testing Program. This efficiency is attributed to the labor resources and confidence in subcontractor's historical knowledge and expertise of the work scope, which required less oversight/management.

Impact: There is no impact to any other activities outside of this account.
Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance.

5.03.12.02.02 Technology Maturation & Analysis $1,943k

Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due the following: 1) Labor usage efficiencies have been realized in the Technology Maturation & Analysis LOE account, as there has been

less management oversight/support required than what was originally planned. This is primarily due to a senior project manager being moved to another project in mid-Fiscal Year (FY) 16, the attrition of project manager in mid-FY 17, and the attrition of a senior engineer mid-year FY 16. The responsibilities for the senior project manager and the senior engineer have been filled by existing resources. The other project manager position has been supported in the interim by another staff member also already on-

board. 2) Resource usage efficiencies related to the subcontract support for external reviews and technical support in the Technology Maturation & Analysis LOE account. To

date, there has been less subcontract support required than originally planned.

Impact: There is no impact to any other activities outside of this account.
Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance.

SLIDE 98

98

Chief Technology Office & Closure Major Contract to Date Variances

December 2017

Cost (cont.)

5.03.01.07.03 Waste Feed Delivery Technology $1,901k

Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to the following: 1) FY 17 cost efficiencies realized in the preparation for Hanford Waste End Effector (HWEE) Testing, and Under Double-

Shell Tank (DST) Non-Visual Inspection Effectiveness Testing. The definition phase of both projects was performed with significantly less resources than originally planned as the project team has been able to leverage existing data to its advantage for the Simulant and End Effector design. Additionally, PNNL and WRPS were able to effectively engage their team and contributing counterparts in preparing for both tests. 2) Subcontract technical support of emerging engineering studies, under WFD Technology

Solutions. This is a level of effort activity and required less support than planned in FY 14 and FY 15. 3) The subcontract work performed by EnergySolutions for the Small-

Scale Solids Delivery Testing, which started in FY 2014 and completed in the 4th quarter of FY 15, experienced cost efficiencies due to its labor pricing and usage being less than planned, FY 14 and FY 15. 4) Subcontract resource usage efficiencies realized in FY 16 in the WFD Technology Solutions account, which is attributed to less than planned external reviews and technical support.

Impact: There is no impact to any other activities outside of this account.
Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance.

5.03.01.07.05 WFD System Performance $1,418k

Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to labor usage and price efficiencies in subcontract resources and labor. 1) The subcontract work for the Isolok Reference Sampler

Testing, which began in FY 14 and completed in the third quarter of FY 15, experienced efficiencies due to subcontractor labor rates and actual usage being less than

riginally assumed in the baseline. Also, less subcontract oversight was required due to the experience of the subcontracted resources. 2) Fewer labor resources were used

than what was planned in support of the Feed Delivery Technical Issue Resolution in FY 2014.

Impact: There is no impact to any other activities outside of this account.
Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance.

5.03.10.03.02 Secondary Waste Form Development $1,277k

Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to resource usage and price efficiencies realized by the National Laboratories subcontracted to perform this scope. 1)The work being

performed by SRNL in support of the Waste Form Development of Fresh Properties has experienced resource usage efficiencies in the work performed to date and the project expects that this trend will continue with their remaining work. The contract was awarded to SRNL for significantly less than what was originally estimated and to date, they have been able to execute the scope within the funds awarded and they do not expect to exceed this. 2) PNNL experienced resource usage and price efficiencies in FY

14. This is attributed to the fact that PNNL has worked extensively in the past on similar work scope and was able to engage efficiently to support this effort. 3) The National

Labs (PNNL & SRNL) contracted to support Secondary Waste Form Development in FY 15 also experienced resource usage and price efficiencies, again due to the fact that the national labs have worked extensively in the past on similar work scope and were able to engage efficiently to support this effort.

Impact: No impact to the project.
Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance.

5.02.04.01.01 Closure Program Management $1,015k

Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to labor efficiencies. In prior fiscal years, this level of effort account experienced vacancies in technical personnel, both direct and staff

aug positions. The scope outside of this account was designated as high priority. Resources planned under this account were diverted to support the higher priority work scope.

Impact: No impact to the project.
Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance.

SLIDE 99

99

Chief Technology Office & Closure Major Contract to Date Variances

December 2017

Schedule

5.02.01.04.01 Vadose Zone Mgmt & Regulatory Docs -$1,118k

Cause: The CTD SV is primarily due to delays in receiving Ecology's comments on the RFI and CMS documents. The RFI and CMS documents were submitted to Ecology in

DEC 16, and comments were expected the week of FEB 15, 17. However, Ecology has not returned comments on these two documents. Ecology submitted a letter (17- NWP-058) to ORP on MAY 22, 17 requesting an extension for completing its review and final comments on WMA C documents (RCRA Closure Analysis of WMA C, PA of WMA C, Analysis of Past Tank Waste Leaks and Losses, and BRA for WMA C) by JUL 16, 17. Ecology has requested several extensions (via letter transmittals) to complete its review. The latest letter received in DEC 17 anticipates a completed review by JAN 16, 18. Until Ecology completes its review and comments of these documents, it can't start its review and comments of the RFI/CMS. Ecology will address the RFI/CMS documents after completion of WMA C document reviews.

Impact: The SV is expected to continue until comments are received from Ecology on the RFI and CMS documents. Despite the delays, WRPS will still be able to respond to

the comments and update the reports in order to meet the TPA milestone (M-045-62: Submit Phase 2 Corrective Measures Implementation Work Plan for WMA C) by its due

date. However, work on the CMIP cannot proceed as planned and was re-planned. A modification to the baseline activities was implemented under BCR RPP-17-134, which

better aligned the CMIP activities with the official proposed Milestone finish date of AUG 31, 28 (17-TF-0046).

Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned.

5.02.04.02.07 Waste Mgt Area C Performance Assessment -$894k

Cause: The CTD SV is primarily due to (1) a delay in receiving comments from Ecology on WMA C documents - Past Leaks Analysis, Baseline Risk Assessment, RCRA

Closure Analysis, and (2) a delay in initiating NRC review of the WMA C PA as planned/scheduled. This NRC review of the WMA C PA is linked to the NRC review of the WMA C WIR being done under WBS 5.2.4.2.3.2 (DOE 435.1 Closure Plans). The WIR was transmitted to DOE-HQ for review by the Office of General Council in JUL

17. The time required for review and approval by the Office of General Council at DOE-HQ to submit the WIR to NRC for review is expected to delay the start of the

concurrent NRC review of the WMA C PA and WIR until the FEB to MAR 18 timeframe.

Impact: The delay in receiving comments back from Ecology on the following WMA C documents, Past Leaks Analysis, Baseline Risk Assessment, RCRA Closure Analysis,

will delay completion of updates to these documents until sometime in FY18. The delay in the start of NRC review will push out completion of the concurrent PA review by the NRC into FY18 and will impact completion of updates to the WMA C PA in response to NRC review comments until, at the earliest time, the end of the last quarter of

FY18. The delay in the start of the NRC review of the WMA C PA will have a similar impact in the NRC review for the WMA C WIR and updates planned in response to NRC

review comments on the WIR (See 5.2.4.2.3.2 DOE 435.1 Closure Plans).

Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned.

5.02.04.02.03 RCRA Closure Plan Updates -$599k

Cause: The CTD SV has improved from NOV 17 to DEC 17; however, the CTD SV is still primarily due to delayed receipt of comments from ORP and Ecology on the TPA

Closure Plans, and from ORP and DOE-EM on the WIR evaluation.

Impact: The delay will impact the completion of final drafts of the TPA Closure Plans and DOE 435.1 documents (WIR Evaluation and Closure Plans), which have been

carried over from FY17 into FY18.

Corrective Action: A strategy is being developed to accelerate the final approval of the DOE O 435.1 documents (WIR Evaluation and Closure Plans). Discussions are on-

going with Ecology on the path forward for the TPA Closure Plans. The CAM and project leads are aware of the delays and discussing this topic weekly.

SLIDE 100

100

Chief Technology Office & Closure Major Contract to Date Variances

December 2017

Schedule (cont.)

5.03.12.02.04 Solid Secondary Waste Stream Tech Mat (DFLAW) -$526k

Cause: The CTD SV is primarily due to the Solid Secondary Waste (SSW) - phase 2 preparation and curing of the samples, and conducting the waste form tests 1 & 2, starting

later than expected. Delays are due to limitations of subcontracted resources, and additional preparation of samples and cure times.

Impact: No impact to critical path or other control accounts.
Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. The variance is expected to continue into the first quarter of FY 2018.

5.03.06.01.04 IDF Glass Testing -$416k

Cause: The CTD SV is primarily due to the Lysimeter facility upgrades. Transfer of the Field Lysimeter Test Facility (FLTF) and needed upgrades has delayed procuring

equipment, preparing test materials and preparing the Lysimeter samples for insertion into the facility. It is anticipated that these activities will not start until the second quarter of FY 18. Upon completion of the upgrades to the facility, PNNL can perform the detailed test configuration definition and pretest modeling for the Lysimeter testing.

Impact: The transfer of the Field Lysimeter Test Facility (FLTF)from CH2MHILL to WRPS, and upgrading the facility is largely driving out the preparation of the Lysimeter for

Waste Form Insertion and is expected to move out to the second quarter of FY 18. This will delay the start of testing to be done in FY 18; however, there is no current impact to critical downstream tasks as a result of this schedule variance.

Corrective Action: There is no corrective action for the CTD SV. The SV is expected to continue to the end of fiscal year 2018.

5.03.12.02.03 Liquid Secondary Waste Stream Tech Mat (DFLAW) -$335k

Cause: The CTD SV is primarily due to the EMF Bottoms leachate testing was originally planned to perform to EPA standard 1313 (28 day duration). It was subsequently

determined that additional testing needed to be performed to EPA standard 1315 (63 day duration) to obtain adequate, meaningful data. The testing to EPA standard 1315 will require additional analysis. Additionally, agreement as to the contracting method/procurement process for Los Alamos National Lab (LANL) (EMF glass and simulant testing work scope) and Savannah River National Lab (SRNL) (EMF Concentrate IX testing) has not been reached resulting in delays to the award of these subcontracts. Impact: No impact to critical path or other control accounts.

Corrective Action: There is no corrective action for the CTD SV. The SV is expected to continue until the contract is let, the second quarter of fiscal year 2018. Currently

evaluating National Labs to do the work, then contracting the lab to perform the scope as efficiently as possible. 5.02.04.02.08 Waste Mgt Area A/AX Perf Assessment -$330k

Cause: The CTD SV is primarily due to (1) activities X242-82WA1-11 and X242-82WA1-12 (Review by Ecology and update Residual Inventory & Soil Inventory Rev. 0

documents). These activities cannot proceed due to Ecology's priorities. Ecology was unable to review the data packages describing WMA A-AX Tank Residual Inventories and WMA A-AX Soil Inventory in FY17, so this scope carried over to FY18. The (FES) schedule was modified to shift the Ecology review into the early part of FY18, when Ecology’s schedule will allow for this review; (2) the STOMP transport model is not yet operating efficiently, which has caused a delay in both Y242-83A60-01 (Preliminary Analysis of Tank Residual Impacts - Develop inputs for base case) and Y242-83A52-01 (benchmarking the System Model).

Impact: The review, dispositioning and incorporation of Ecology comments into the Residual Inventory and Soil Inventory documents cannot be completed until after the

Ecology review and receipt of their comments. The FY17 scheduled activities (X242-82WA1-11 and X242-82WA1-12), resolving comments and updating the documents, is expected to be completed by FEB 18. The delays with STOMP transport model development have caused a negative SV, but should be recovered by implementing the usage of eSTOMP (a different version of STOMP that runs more efficiently).

Corrective Action: Subcontractor has the new version of STOMP (eSTOMP) loaded on their system and will begin running tests to see how much more efficiently it will

produce results. Once test is complete, then Intera and WRPS will proceed with benchmarking the System Model and performing Tank Residual Analyses.

SLIDE 101

101

Chief Technology Office FY 2018 Key Deliverables

December 2017

FY 2018 Key Deliverables Target Forecast

Complete design of a new sampling technique for the Tank Farms – PBI-42.0.5 Q3 APR 18 Complete selection of non-destructive examination (NDE) technology based on FY 2017 Effectiveness Testing and complete integration testing with a delivery system for under double shell tank developed by the Tank and Pipeline Integrity (TAPI) group – PBI-42.0.2 Q4 SEP 18 Modify and issue revision to the RPP Technology Roadmap – PBI-42.0.4 Q4 SEP 18 Complete requirement and specification definition, detailed design, and fabrication and factory acceptance testing of a mechanical waste gathering system technology and submit an effectiveness test report – PBI-42.0.9 Q4 MAY 18 Operate the current first feed AP-107 through the DFLAW Radioactive Waste Test Platform to support Waste Feed Qualifications PBI-42.0.8 Q4 DEC 18 Complete testing and laboratory studies to support disposal related waste form performance necessary for advanced glasses, secondary liquid waste streams, and secondary solid waste forms – PBI-42.0.1 Q4 SEP 18 Complete detailed test configuration definition and pretest modeling for lysimeter testing – PBI-42.0.6 Q3 APR 18 Complete waste form development and performance testing for EMF bottoms disposition onsite – PBI-42.0.3 Q4 SEP 18 Complete AP-105 Radioactive Waste Platform Operations, including grouting evaporator bottoms – PBI-42.0.7 Q3 AUG 18

SLIDE 102

102

Closure & Corrective Measures FY 2018 Key Deliverables

December 2017

FY 2018 Key Deliverables Target Forecast

In support of completion of TPA M-045-92, prepare Barrier 3 Design/Monitoring Plan – PBI-41.0.1 Q3 SEP 2018 Provide to ORP and DOE LFRG responses to DOE LFRG review comments on Rev. B of the Integrated Disposal Facility Performance Assessment (IDF PA) along with an updated PA document that incorporates the proposed revisions to address the comments – PBI-41.0.5 Q3

SEP 2018

SLIDE 103

103

Chief Technology Office & Closure Contract Changes

December 2017

Contract Changes Assigned Date Tech Lead Target Completion Estimated Impact ($M) Current Status Contract Mod 459 - NTE Increase SX Barrier Expansion Design 20-Nov-17

D. Parker

Jan-18 $100k NTE increase from $100k to $200k. Refer to Current Status for Initial NTE for proposal status (CP-17-019). BCR RPP-18-025 processed and implemented in November for additional scope.

SLIDE 104

104

Chief Technology Office & Closure BCR Status

December 2017

BCR#/Description Level Assigned Date CAM Target Completion Estimated Impact Current Status

SLIDE 105

One System December 2017

SLIDE 106

106

One System Ov Over erview view

December 2017

SLIDE 107

107

One System Sc Sche hedu dule le Rec ecover ery

December 2017

Cumulative to Date SV Forecast

SLIDE 108

Cost

5.03.01.07.01 Project Flowsheets -$247k

Cause: The CM CV is primarily due to payment for gProms licenses which occurred in December 2017. The gProms licenses were originally planned for procurement through

the subcontract process. However, due to procurement workload at Fiscal Year End (FYE) for 2017, the subcontract was not awarded. In order to obtain the license renewals before they expired, the gProms licenses were purchased though the ADP process at the end of September 2017. It was expected that the cost would be incurred during October 2017, and the associated performance was reported in October. However, FYE 2017 processes resulted in the delays in posting of P-Card cost.

Impact: There is no impact to any other baseline activities outside of this account.

108

One System Major Major Cur Curren ent t Mont Month V h Var arianc iances es

December 2017

SLIDE 109

Schedule

5.03.06.01.03 ILAW Transporters $154k

Cause: Fabrication of the ILAW Transporter trailer expected to be completed in Feb 18 was completed Dec 17, ahead of the current plan. This resulted in substantially higher

performance taken in Dec then planned.

Impact: There is no impact to any other activities outside of this account

109

One System Major Major Cur Curren ent t Mont Month V h Var arianc iances es

December 2017

SLIDE 110

Cost

5.01.05.04.04 One System Nuclear Safety & Engineering $2,994k

Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to efficiencies realized as a result of changes in the processes used for the development of Project Implementation Plans

(PIPs). Specifically, a standardized PIP process was developed and implemented for the development and completion of multiple PIPs under the Engineering Program Integration account, which eliminated a significant duplication of effort. Additional efficiencies were realized in FY 2014, when PIP templates were

development. Implementation of the standardized process and templates required less labor, staff augmentation, and subcontracted resources to perform the PIP work
scope. The implementation of a process assigning PIPs with similar objectives/scope to subcontracted resources resulted in the realization of additional labor and

subcontract efficiencies in the Nuclear Safety DSA Program Development work package. This is a level-of-effort account that has planned labor resources that are vacant,

ne Manager and one Engineer. Due to changes in the nature and volume of scope under this account, there are not any plans to retain resources for these vacancies. This

has resulted in more efficient performance of the work scope with the existing resources.

Impact: There is no impact to any other activities/accounts outside of this account.
Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance.

5.03.12.03.01 Alternative Engineering & Development $2,603k

Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to labor and subcontract efficiencies for:
The LERF/ETF Phased Engineering Study and Strategic Initiatives Analysis Plan (SIAP) is being performed by internal labor resource. This scope was originally planned to

be accomplished via subcontracted resources.

New data was obtained from the CH-TRU project, which resulted in a more efficient analysis of the RH-TRU project risks and issues.
The RH-TRU project risks and issues analysis provided sufficient technical data to eliminate the necessity of conducting the planned RH-TRU engineering study, and was

utilized to prepare a white paper in support of the SIAP.

The effort required for the development, scenario selection, and analysis/organization activities was less than planned due to the experience and historical knowledge of the

internal labor and subcontracted resources that performed the work scope.

Impact: There is no impact to any other baseline activities outside of this account.
Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance.

5.03.07.05.01 WTP Interface Management $2,451k

Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to experienced labor and subcontract efficiencies in the Secondary Solid Waste Mgmt and Interface Control Program work packages

during FY14 and FY15. Secondary Solid Waste Mgmt:

Fewer resources were required to accomplish the work scope due to the utilization of experienced personnel with extensive historical knowledge. Specifically, the

subcontracted WIR author had an excellent background in producing WIRs for other DOE sites, and was able to draft document sections in less time than estimated. At the same time produced draft WIR section, with the WRPS WIR technical lead, at a quality level that resulted in minimal comments and re-work.

The initial IDF PA subcontractor completed its independent analyses and reviews ahead of schedule, allowing for early closeout of the subcontract. A subsequent

subcontract was awarded to a less costly independent resource where support consisted of simple phone calls for expert analysis.

More efficient completion of inventory data package scope was experienced, allowing internal resources flexibility to support the WRPS IDF PA organization in its level-of-

effort activities, which are outside the scope of this WBS. Interface Control Program:

The accomplishment of work scope under this work package required fewer labor resources than planned as a result of technical lead reviews from Operations/Engineering

personnel, and minimal technical manager oversight of subcontracted resources.

110

One System Major Major Con Contr trac act to t to Da Date te V Var arianc iances es

December 2017

Cost

5.1.5.4.4 One System Nuclear Safety & Engineering $2,974k

Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to efficiencies realized as a result of changes in the processes used for the development of Project Implementation Plans

(PIPs). Specifically, a standardized PIP process was developed and implemented for the development and completion of multiple PIPs under the Engineering Program Integration account, which eliminated a significant duplication of effort. Additional efficiencies were realized in FY 2014, when PIP templates were

development. Implementation of the standardized process and templates required less labor, staff augmentation, and subcontracted resources to perform the PIP work
scope. The implementation of a process assigning PIPs with similar objectives/scope to subcontracted resources resulted in the realization of additional labor and

subcontract efficiencies in the Nuclear Safety DSA Program Development work package. This is a level-of-effort account that has planned labor resources that are vacant,

ne Manager and one Engineer. Due to changes in the nature and volume of scope under this account, there are not any plans to retain resources for these vacancies. This

has resulted in more efficient performance of the work scope with the existing resources.

Impact: There is no impact to any other activities/accounts outside of this account.
Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance.

5.3.12.3.1 Alternative Engineering & Development $2,595k

Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to labor and subcontract efficiencies for:
The LERF/ETF Phased Engineering Study and Strategic Initiatives Analysis Plan (SIAP) is being performed by internal labor resource. This scope was originally planned to

be accomplished via subcontracted resources.

New data was obtained from the CH-TRU project, which resulted in a more efficient analysis of the RH-TRU project risks and issues.
The RH-TRU project risks and issues analysis provided sufficient technical data to eliminate the necessity of conducting the planned RH-TRU engineering study, and was

utilized to prepare a white paper in support of the SIAP.

The effort required for the development, scenario selection, and analysis/organization activities was less than planned due to the experience and historical knowledge of the

internal labor and subcontracted resources that performed the work scope.

Impact: There is no impact to any other baseline activities outside of this account.
Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance.

5.3.7.5.1 WTP Interface Management $2,430k

Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to experienced labor and subcontract efficiencies in the Secondary Solid Waste Mgmt and Interface Control Program work packages

during FY14 and FY15. Secondary Solid Waste Mgmt:

Fewer resources were required to accomplish the work scope due to the utilization of experienced personnel with extensive historical knowledge. Specifically, the

subcontracted WIR author had an excellent background in producing WIRs for other DOE sites, and was able to draft document sections in less time than estimated. At the same time produced draft WIR section, with the WRPS WIR technical lead, at a quality level that resulted in minimal comments and re-work.

The initial IDF PA subcontractor completed its independent analyses and reviews ahead of schedule, allowing for early closeout of the subcontract. A subsequent

subcontract was awarded to a less costly independent resource where support consisted of simple phone calls for expert analysis.

More efficient completion of inventory data package scope was experienced, allowing internal resources flexibility to support the WRPS IDF PA organization in its level-of-

effort activities, which are outside the scope of this WBS.

SLIDE 111

111

One System Major Major Con Contr trac act to t to Da Date te V Var arianc iances es

December 2017

Cost (cont.)

5.03.07.05.01 WTP Interface Management $2,451k (cont.)

Impact: There are no impacts to any other activities or accounts outside of this account.
Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance.

5.03.07.08.01 WTP Integrated Readiness Preparation $2,334k

Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to labor efficiencies being realized in the Integrated Readiness Preparation and the Integrated Readiness Program Management work
packages. The work scope performed to date has been accomplished by fewer resources than planned due to their experience and historical knowledge of the work
scope. The CTD CV in the Integrated Readiness Preparation work package consists of historical labor under-runs in FY14-FY16 as well as additional labor under-runs in the

current fiscal year. Additionally, the CTD CV in the Integrated Readiness Program Management work package consists of historical labor under-runs in FY14-FY16, as well as additional labor under-runs in the current fiscal year.

Impact: There are no impacts to any other activities or accounts outside of this account.
Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance.

5.03.01.01.08 One System Support Program $1,975k

Cause: The CTD CV for this level-of-effort account is primarily due to:
Labor & Staff Aug: Under the One System Project Controls Management work package, a scheduler is planned to maintain the DFLAW Integration schedule. The

maintenance/update of this schedule has been performed by an existing One System Project Controls resource, and has not required retention of an additional

scheduler. Also, BTR support was planned at 0.8 FTE, with actual support experienced at 0.5 FTE. The number and size of the subcontract support realized to date is less

than planned. As a result, a decreased level of BTR support has been required. Additionally, a senior-level communication specialist was planned. An existing staff aug resource was utilized to perform the planned communication specialist work scope through Jan 17. However, this was a shared resource and the actual level of support was less than originally planned. As of Feb 17, a subcontracted resource was retained to perform the communication specialist scope. The subcontracted resource is less experienced than originally planned, and the actual effective hourly rate is less than the planned hourly rate for this position. The level of ESH&Q support planned for level of effort Integrated Permitting Strategies and ESH&Q Program Support work packages has not been experienced. The level of support provided to other organizations/projects has been higher than anticipated, which has resulted in a lower level of support to the Integrated Permitting Strategies and Program Support scope.

Subcontracts: The planned subcontract support for FY 16 and 17 was based on the actual experience for FY 15. One System was re-organized during FY 15 and

conducted independent/external assessments to determine/validate the effectiveness of the One System organizational changes. Several technical specialists were also retained via subcontract to independent technical and integration support. However, as One System has evolved and established a foundation since the FY 15 re-

rganization, it has not required the same level of independent/external subcontracted support and as that experienced in FY 15. Therefore, the actual number and value of

subcontract support is less than originally planned.

Impact: There are no impacts to any other activities or accounts outside of this account.
Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance.

SLIDE 112

Cost (cont.)

5.03.01.07.01 Project Flowsheets $1,764k

Cause: The CTD CV is due to experienced efficiencies for labor and subcontract resources.
Labor: Fewer Chemical Engineer resources have been required by utilizing personnel with extensive experience and historical knowledge with the work scope. The Project

Flowsheet Manager position was vacant for 5 months (between Jul 16 and Dec 16). The resource retained to fill this position has an effective actual hourly rate that is less than the Manager hourly rate used for planning. This is offset by the Staff Aug modeling support, which is significantly greater than planned, due to both the number of planned resources (1 planned, 2 actual) and the level of support required.

Subcontracts: Due to a realignment of work scope priorities, the planned level of subcontract support has not been required. Internal labor resources were utilized to

perform the work scope.

Impact: There is no impact to any other activities outside of this account.
Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance.

5.03.01.02.06 Mission Analysis $1,718k

Cause: The CTD CV is due to experienced efficiencies for labor, material, and staff aug resources.

Mission Analysis:

Labor: Work scope requested by the Department of Energy, Office of River Protection, did not require planned chemist support. During mid-Jul 15, the planned Mission

Analysis group manager, transitioned to an acting Level 2 manager position. A more junior resource was assigned as the Mission Analysis group manager. The actual hourly rate for the junior resource is less than the manager hourly rate utilized for planning.

Material: Due to the advanced capabilities and performance of site standard computer, the organization was able to utilize site standard computers, instead of the planned

higher cost non-standard high-end computers. Also, software maintenance agreements were not renewed due to lack of quality and service provided by the vendor. Operations & WFD Planning:

Labor: Junior Chemical Engineers were utilized to accomplish the planned work scope, with an actual hourly rate that is less than the Chemical Engineer hourly rate utilized

for planning ($72/hr actual effective rate vs $77/hour planning rate). Also, historical costs were utilized to plan this work, however the effort required was not as substantial as planned. System Plan Rev. 8:

Subcontracts: Based on previous System Plan experience .5 FTE was budgeted to help recover system plan overruns if needed. This support was not required.
Impact: There is no impact to any other activities outside of this account.
Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance.

5.03.01.01.03 WTP Support Program Development $1,352k

Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to labor usage efficiencies in OS Support Program Dev., Project Controls Prog. Mgmt., OS ESH&Q Technical support and OS Front-end

Design & Def. Program Mgmt Level of Effort work packages. In FY 2014, delays in company staffing approvals were experienced in Project Controls Prog. Mgmt $521k, OS Front-end Design & Def Program Mgmt $154k, and OS ESH&Q Technical support $470k. In addition, OS Support Program Dev. utilized less subcontract support than planned $290. In FY 2015, labor usage efficiencies were experienced in One System ESH&Q Technical Support $334k and Project Controls Program Mgmt. $287k due to delays in company staffing approvals and vacant positions not being filled. This was partially offset by inefficiencies resulting from the high labor rate for senior-level managers and the unplanned deputy in OS Support Program Dev. -$322k.

Impact: There is no impact to any other activities outside of this account.
Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance and the work scope is complete.

112

One System Major Major Con Contr trac act to t to Da Date te V Var arianc iances es

December 2017

SLIDE 113

113

One System Major Major Con Contr trac act to t to Da Date te V Var arianc iances es

December 2017

Cost (cont.)

5.03.01.02.07 Software Maintenance and Support $1,174k

Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to labor and subcontract resource efficiencies.
Labor: Junior Chemical Engineers were utilized to accomplish the planned work scope, with an actual hourly rate that is less than the Chemical Engineer hourly rate utilized

for planning ($72/hr actual effective rate vs $77/hour planning rate).

Subcontracts: Between Apr 15 and Jul 15, management assessments and dynamic model evaluations were performed. These activities were originally planned to be

performed via subcontract. However, it was determined that internal resources had the knowledge and expertise to accomplish this work scope. Significant efficiencies were realized through the use of available internal labor instead of the more costly subcontracts.

Impact: There are no impacts to any baseline activities outside of this account.
Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance and the work scope is complete.

5.3.7.1.1 WTP Operational Readiness Program Mgt $1,145k

Cause: Scope is complete on all of the work packages.

FY15 The CTD cost variance is due to re-prioritizing the WTP Design review team to support the Design review of LAW and Pretreat facilities. This resulted in fewer actual costs for the HLW Design Review and WTP LAW Commissioning Strategy Review, $661.8K. Variance is also due to completing the Design and Operability Review with fewer FTEs than planned, ~2 FTEs, for engineering support, $247.5K. The remaining variance is due to early completion of the work scope associated with CP-15-010 which resulted in fewer actuals for the work performed, $204.4K. The team that previously provided support for CP-15-010 was transferred to new subcontract outside of the WRPS

rganization therefore incurring fewer actual costs.

FY14 The FY14 CTD CV value of $640k is primarily due to the LAW Design and Operability Review. The resources were planned for full-time support for the duration of the review activities beginning in March 2014, however, the recruitment and ramp up of personnel was slower than originally planned. The project was not fully staffed until April 2014 ($120.9k). The HLW Design Review scope was completed with less labor and staff aug support than had been planned ($419.5). The reduction in labor was offset by the use of unplanned contract support to complete the scope (-$71). Additionally, the LAW Commissioning Strategy Review was completed underspent in labor ($61.4k) and subcontract support ($231.2k). Impact: No impact to any other activities outside of this account.

Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. The work scope is complete.

SLIDE 114

114

One System Major Major Con Contr trac act to t to Da Date te V Var arianc iances es

December 2017

Schedule

Nothing to report.

SLIDE 115

FY 2018 Key Deliverables

Target Forecast Process Control Plan Q4 SEP 2018 Issue Multi-year Operating Plan Revision 6 Q2 JAN 2018 Submit the TSCR Flowsheet Revision 0 Q2 FEB 2018 Submit the RPP Integrated Flowsheet Maturation Plan Revision 3 Q4 AUG 2018 Submit the River Protection Project (RPP) System Plan 8 Addendum (Strategic Plan) – PBI-39.0.1 Q4 SEP 2018 Release Near-Term Operations Tool (NTO) to operational Status – PBI-39.0.7 Q2 APR 2018

Integration of Near-Term Operations Tool (NTO) with TOPSim – PBI-39.0.8 Q4 SEP 2018 Develop the Long-Term Operations (LTO) Tool prototype – PBI-39.0.9 Q4 SEP 2018 Accept delivery of the fabricated prototype Immobilized Low Activity Waste (ILAW) Transporter System – PBI-39.0.2 Q3 JUL 2018 Complete the Draft ILAW container Packaging Specific Safety Document (PSSD) and submit to ORP for comment – PBI- 39.0.4 Q4 SEP 2018 Submit Final Phase 2 ILAW Waste Incidental to Reprocessing (WIR) Technical Basis document to ORP – PBI-39.0.3 Q2 SEP 2018 Implement Tank Waste Treatment Secondary Solid Waste Matrix Q3 JUN 2018 Submit the revised Operational Readiness Support Plan (Revision 4) to ORP – PBI-39.0.5 Q4 SEP 2018 Issue the Direct Feed Low Activity Waste (DFLAW) Integrated Operational Research (OR) Model Results Report – PBI- 39.0.6 Q4 AUG 2018 Issue the CCW Liquid Effluent Disposition Evaluation Report Q3 MAY 2018 Submit the WTP transition support strategy to ORP Q1 NOV 2017

115

One System FY FY 2018 2018 Key ey Deliv Deliver erables bles

December 2017

SLIDE 116

116

One System Con Contr trac act Chan t Change ges s

December 2017

Contract Changes Assigned Date Tech Lead Target Completion Estimated Impact ($M) Current Status Contract Mod 424 - NTE for PSSD 23-Feb-17

R. Tedeschi

Jan-18 $200k Contract Change Proposal (CP -17-006) submitted to DOE March 6, 2017. Revised ERRATA submitted to ORP November 1, 2017. ORP evaluation of proposal in progress. Contract Mod 450 - NTE for WTP Transition Support 12-Sep-17

A. Exley

Jan-18 $200k Contract Change Proposal (CP-17-023) submitted to ORP in November 2017. BCR 17-172 implemented in September 2017. Contract Mod 460 - NTE Increase for PSSD 16-Nov-17

R. Tedeschi

Nov-17 $150k Increase PSSD NTE from $200k to $350k. Refer to Current Status for Mod 424 for proposal status (CP-17- 006).

SLIDE 117

117

One System BCR BCR Sta Statu tus s

December 2017

BCR#/Description Level Assigned Date CAM Target Completion Estimated Impact Current Status

SLIDE 118

Production Operations December 2017

Loading of Waste Box for Clean Up and Disposal of Low Level Waste from the 242-A Evaporator and AW Farm Scanning of Plates 1, 2, 3, and 4 Zero Beam in Riser 89

SLIDE 119

119

Production Operations Safety Performance Summary

December 2017

As of December 31, 2017 Production Operations has worked 436,140 hours or 327 days without a Lost Time Workday Injury, and has worked 110 days since a Recordable case.

First Aid Case:

12 Month Rolling Average: 6.54

Two Cases in December

 Employee lost balance and struck leg on light plant causing strain to leg.  Employee slipped on ice that was covered in snow causing strain to hand.

Total Recordable Case:

12 Month Rolling Average: 0.48

No Cases in December

Days Away, Restricted or Transferred Case (DART):

12 Month Rolling Average: 0.24

No Cases in December

SLIDE 120

CM Schedule Variance -$554k

5.1.2.2 – Tank Waste Volume Management -$350k Cause: (1) DST Recirculation, -$154k – early performance of the AP-106 DST Recirculation by one month in November, BCWS is in the current month window. (2) Level Rise/Surveillance, -$41k – early performance of the AP-106 Level Rise/Leak Check by one month in November, BCWS is in the current month window. (3) DST to DST Transfers, -$154k – schedule delay of DST Waste Transfer DT-02 planned from Tank AN-106 to Tank AP-102 in December 2017. This transfer was originally required to support C-105 Retrieval, however, due to efficiencies achieved and early completion of C-105 Retrieval, this transfer is no longer required. The Transfer schedule has been re-sequenced and schedule recovery for DT-02 is planned in February 2018 with the completion of DST Waste Transfer from Tank AP-106 to Tank AW-106. Impact: (1) (2) No impact to critical path or other control accounts. Schedule acceleration of one month, scope originally planned to be completed in December 2017. (3) No impact to critical path or other control accounts. Schedule has been delayed by two months. Schedule recovery for DT-02 is planned in February 2018. However, due to the new execution strategy and re- sequencing of the transfer schedule, the planned completion of 11 Transfers in FY 2018 has been reduced to 10 Transfers in FY 2018 with one transfer projected to carryover into FY 2019. Corrective Action: No corrective actions required. 5.1.3.3 – 222-S Laboratory Facility Option Period 2 -$201k Cause: (1) 222-S HVAC – Vent Supply & Exhaust Fan Replacement, -$168k – schedule delayed by two months due to a change in the field execution strategy. The original plan was to enter a 222-S Laboratory Facility Outage, demo the Air Handling Units (AHUs) and the Exhaust Fans, install the new components, and perform testing and commissioning. This was found to be not feasible due to the facility requirements of continually maintaining negativity exhaust airflow. A new execution strategy is being developed with the Subcontractor and the Facility and Project Managers. (2) Room Renovation – 4N, -$86k – schedule delayed by two months due to the late award of the Construction contract. Contract was awarded in mid-November and mobilization efforts began in December. (3) Ancillary Equipment Addition Design, -$45k – schedule delayed by two months due to the late award of the Design Contract. Contract was awarded in mid-November and design efforts were initiated. Impact: (1) No impact to critical path or other control accounts. Schedule has been delayed by two months. Schedule recovery planned by fiscal-year end. (2) No impact to critical path or other control accounts. Schedule has been delayed by two months. Schedule recovery planned in July 2018. (3) No impact to critical path or other control accounts. Schedule has been delayed by one month. Schedule recovery planned in May 2018. Corrective Action: (1) A new execution strategy is being developed with the Subcontractor and the Facility and Project Managers and will be implemented into the Field Execution Schedule once it is finalized (2) (3) No corrective actions required. 5.1.2.3 – 242-A Evaporator -$100k Cause: Early performance of the 242-A Evaporator MCS Software License Agreement in November by one month, BCWS is in the current month window. Impact: No impact to critical path or other control accounts. Schedule acceleration of one month, scope originally planned to be completed in December 2017. Corrective Action: No corrective actions required.

WBS BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV SPI CPI BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV SPI CPI TCPI CP VAC CP BAC 5.01.01.01 - Base Operations Project Mgmt 756 851 754 96 97 2,199 2,231 2,099 32 132 1.01 1.06 52,894 52,926 51,457 32 1,469 1.00 1.03 0.96 1,161 60,106 5.01.01.02 - TSR Surveillance & Maintenance

153,460

153,460 153,457

3

1.00 1.00

3

153,460 5.01.01.06 - Solid Waste Management 871 871 1,044

173

2,594 2,594 2,955

361

1.00 0.88 81,484 81,484 74,456

7,028

1.00 1.09 1.02 7,190 90,263 5.01.01.11 - Base Operations East Area Farms 2,311 2,311 2,647

336

6,885 6,885 7,302

418

1.00 0.94 187,307 187,307 178,236

9,071

1.00 1.05 1.00 9,007 210,220 5.01.01.12 - Base Operations West Area Farms 906 892 1,035

14
143

2,706 2,658 3,060

48
402

0.98 0.87 71,126 71,079 66,987

48

4,092 1.00 1.06 0.93 3,365 80,217 5.01.01.13 - Base Operations Support/Special Projects 2,000 2,000 2,327

327

5,957 5,957 6,493

535

1.00 0.92 124,660 124,660 144,438

19,778

1.00 0.86 0.95

20,872

145,200 5.01.02.02 - Tank Waste Volume Management 542 192 134

350

58 1,469 1,353 873

116

480 0.92 1.55 28,390 28,221 23,725

169

4,496 0.99 1.19 1.12 4,941 32,300 5.01.02.03 - 242-A Evaporator 854 754 920

100
166

2,346 2,346 2,700

355

1.00 0.87 77,114 77,114 79,989

2,874

1.00 0.96 0.98

3,044

85,763 5.01.02.06 - Effluent Treatment Facility 1,206 1,206 1,747

541

3,544 3,544 4,972

1,428

1.00 0.71 54,179 54,179 54,680

501

1.00 0.99 0.99

694

70,201 5.01.03.01 - 222-S Laboratory Facility

13

69 13

56
442

550 442

108
0.80

233,563 233,463 227,218

100

6,245 1.00 1.03 1.39 6,272 233,563 5.01.03.03 - 222-S Laboratory Facility Option Period 2 3,691 3,490 3,595

201
105

10,849 10,441 9,701

408

740 0.96 1.08 54,934 54,247 50,761

687

3,486 0.99 1.07 0.98 2,648 90,668 5.01.03.04 - 222-SA Facility Replacement

1

5 1

3

13 16 12 3 4 1.20 1.31 1,242 1,240 1,096

2

144 1.00 1.13 0.25 139 1,242 Total 13,135 12,581 14,277

554
1,696

38,560 38,466 40,716

95
2,251

1.00 0.94 1,120,354 1,119,381 1,106,502

973

12,879 1.00 1.01 0.98 10,115 1,253,202 Current Month FYTD Cumulative to Date

120

Production Operations CM Schedule Performance Overview

December 2017

SLIDE 121

121

Production Operations CTD Schedule Performance Overview

December 2017

CTD Schedule Variance

$973k

5.1.3.3 – 222-S Laboratory Facility Option Period 2 -$687k Cause: (1) 222-S HVAC-Vent Supply & Exhaust Fan Replacement, -$444k – schedule delay associated with the Management Oversight of the project. Due to the four month delayed completion of the design, construction award was re-aligned to the new execution strategy to start in October 2017. Because the Management Oversight activity is a single activity that supports the design and construction, this activity was not re- aligned and will reflect an unfavorable schedule variance through the 2nd quarter FY 2018 as the construction activity progresses through completion. (2) 222-S Room Renovation – 4N, -$250k – schedule delayed by two months due to the late award of the Construction contract. (3) Ancillary Equipment Addition Design, -$46k – schedule delayed by two months due to the late award of the Design Contract. Contract was awarded in mid-November and design efforts were initiated. Impact: (1) No impact to critical path or other control accounts. Schedule has been delayed by two months. Schedule recovery planned by fiscal-year end. (2) No impact to critical path or other control accounts. Schedule has been delayed by two months. Schedule recovery planned in July 2018. (3) No impact to critical path or other control accounts. Schedule has been delayed by one month. Schedule recovery planned in May 2018. Corrective Action: No corrective actions required. 5.1.2.2 – Tank Waste Volume Management -$169k Cause: (1) DST to DST Transfers, -$154k – schedule delay of DST Waste Transfer DT-02 planned from Tank AN-106 to Tank AP-102 in December 2017. This transfer was originally required to support C-105 Retrieval, however, due to efficiencies achieved and early completion of C-105 Retrieval, this transfer is no longer required. The Transfer schedule has been re-sequenced and schedule recovery for DT-02 is planned in February 2018 with the completion of DST Waste Transfer from Tank AP-106 to Tank AW-106. (2) External Transfer, -$15k – schedule delay of the 219-S Transfer tied to the predecessor activity under control account 5.1.3.1.31 “222-S Laboratory 219-S P-1 Pump Replacement”. Impact: (1) No impact to critical path or other control accounts. Schedule has been delayed by two months. Schedule recovery for DT-02 is planned in February 2018. However, due to the new execution strategy and re- sequencing of the transfer schedule, the planned completion of 11 Transfers in FY 2018 has been reduced to 10 Transfers in FY 2018 with one transfer projected to carryover into FY 2019. (2) No impact to critical path or other control accounts. Schedule delays of 22 months, scope originally planned to be completed in March 2016. Schedule recovery planned in January 2018. Corrective Action: No corrective actions required. 5.1.3.1 – 222-S Laboratory Facility -$100k Cause: 219-S P-1 Pump Replacement – initial delays in planning the 219-S Pit Entry Investigative Survey Report (ISR) due to unsuccessfully receiving Joint Review Group (JRG) approvals. The ISR work package was required for completing the Radiological Work Permits (RWP) for inclusion into subsequent work packages. Additional delays realized in September 2016, as the investigative entry was placed on hold until higher priority FY 2016 PBI field work and work that was required to be completed to meet a Department of Ecology terminal date were complete. In October, during the initial entry to perform the ISR, it was identified that the P-2 pump is suspected to be leaking. In November, it was determined that the P-2 pump will be replaced at the same time as the P-1 pump. Therefore, the planning package is being re-planned as “High Risk” which includes the P-2 pump replacement. During December through February further delays were experienced due to the Facility Closure days. Additional two month delay in March due to a review meeting held on the Lockout/Tagout Authorization Form and the discovery of additional criterion required through the work control process. In August, an additional 2 month delay was realized as critical resources were reassigned to Tank Farm Projects and Retrieval to support higher priority scope. In November 2017, partial schedule recovery for the FY 2016 carryover scope 219-S P-1 Pump Replacement was realized, however, full schedule recovery was not achieved as planned due to the P-9 pump failure and troubleshooting activities that were required. The troubleshooting activities revealed the pump needed to be replaced. Planning package preparations are in the process to replace the pump with one that is currently in convenient storage and is planned to be completed in early-January 2018. Once the pump is replace, leak detection/testing activities will resume on the P-1, P-2, and P-9 pumps and turnover to Operations Impact: No impact to critical path. An additional two month schedule delay was realized in November 2017. Impacts to control account 5.1.2.2.16 “External Transfers FY16” successor activity “219-S Transfer” are being realized with the two month delay. Full schedule recovery planned in January 2018. Corrective Action: The planning package was re-planned as “High Risk” which includes the P-2 pump replacement and the detailed schedule with logic ties had been placed into the Field Execution Schedule (FES) in December 2016. In March, a revised JRG process was implemented and was submitted to the JRG for approval in June. In late-July, a follow-up JRG was held and approval to execute this scope was received. In August, due to the availability of critical resources, this scope was delayed an additional 2 months. In November 2017, with the failure of the P-9 pump, planning package preparation was initiated to include the replacement of the pump.

SLIDE 122

122

Production Operations CTD Schedule Projection

December 2017

CTD SV Primary Contributors: -$973k

FY 2016 Carryover: 219-S P-1 Pump Replacement -$100k; Schedule recovery in January 2018
FY 2016 Carryover: 219-S External Transfer -$15k; Schedule recovery in January 2018
FY 2018 222-S HVAC Upgrades -$444k; Schedule recovery in September 2018
FY 2018 222-S Room Renovation – 4N -$250k; Schedule recovery in July 2018
FY 2018 DST to DST Transfer -$154k; Schedule recovery in February 2018
FY 2018 Field Lysimeter Test Facility, -$48k, Schedule recovery in April 2018
FY 2018 222-S Ancillary Equipment Addition Design -$46k; Schedule recovery in May 2018

SLIDE 123

123

Production Operations CM Cost Performance Overview

December 2017

CM Cost Variance -$1,696k

5.1.2.6 – Effluent Treatment Facility -$541k Cause: Labor usage inefficiencies (-$328k) and material usage inefficiencies (-$128k), due to an increase in labor/overtime and material procurements associated with troubleshooting plant issues, facility repairs, and increasing corrective maintenance required to support re-start of Operations and LERF Campaigns. Impact: No impact to other control accounts. Unfavorable impact to the EAC was realized. Corrective Action: No corrective actions required. 5.1.1.11 – Base Operations East Area Farms -$336k Cause: Labor usage inefficiencies due to an increase in labor/overtime to support maintenance activities during the month (e.g. alarm reduction initiative, encasement leak detector/flammable gas, AP-103 sludge level measurement, Chemical Vapors Action Plan, AY farm outage, AY-101 annulus exhauster, and troubleshooting and repair of the heater controls at the 702-AZ exhauster). Impact: No impact to other control accounts. Unfavorable impact to the EAC was realized. Corrective Action: No corrective actions required. 5.1.1.13 – Base Operations Support/Special Projects -$327k Cause: Labor usage inefficiencies due to supporting the Mask Issue/Cleaning Station and additional Enhanced IH Monitoring supporting the HAMTC Stop Work and Court Order Injunction within the DST Farms in FY 2016. Impact: No impact to other control accounts. Unfavorable impact to the EAC was realized. Corrective Action: A REA was submitted in September 2017 to ORP, addressing the HAMTC Stop Work and Court Order impacts. (CP-16-023) 5.1.1.6 – Solid Waste Management -$173k Cause: Subcontractor variance during the month with the increased amount of shipments being sent to off-site treatment and disposal facilities. Levels of waste is dependent upon waste received from Operations, Projects, and Retrieval activities that are shipped to off-site treatment and disposal facilities. This will cause fluctuations from month-to-month on actual shipment, but will be within reporting levels at the end of the fiscal year. Impact: No impact to other control accounts. Unfavorable impact to the EAC was realized. Corrective Action: No corrective actions required. 5.1.2.3 – 242-A Evaporator -$166k Cause: Labor usage inefficiencies due to an increase in labor/overtime to support maintenance activities during the month to prepare for start-up of the 242-A Evaporator Campaign EC-08. Impact: No impact to other control accounts. Unfavorable impact to the EAC was realized. Corrective Action: No corrective actions required. 5.1.1.12 – Base Operations West Area Farms -$143k Cause: Labor usage inefficiencies due to an increase in labor/overtime to support maintenance activities during the month (e.g. SY farm enclosures clean and inspect, west area relamping, and T-107 ENRAF calibrations). Impact: No impact to other control accounts. Unfavorable impact to the EAC was realized. Corrective Action: No corrective actions required. 5.1.3.3 – 222-S Laboratory Facility Option Period 2 -$105k Cause: Subcontractor variance as the result of a correction of error in December for the missed re-accrual in November for the 222-S Secondary Transformer Replacement subcontractor final invoice. Impact: No impact to other control accounts. Unfavorable impact to the CM EAC was realized. Corrective Action: No corrective actions required.

SLIDE 124

124

Production Operations CTD Cost Performance Overview

December 2017

CTD Cost Variance $12,879k

5.1.1.11 – Base Operations East Area Farms $9,071k (LOE Control Accounts) 5.1.3.1 – 222-S Laboratory Facility $6,245k (LOE Control Accounts) 5.1.1.12 – Base Operations West Area Farms $4,092k (LOE Control Accounts) 5.1.3.3 – 222-S Laboratory Facility Option Period 2 $3,486k (LOE Control Accounts) Cause: (1) FY 2014 $6,839k, Labor usage efficiencies in the various LOE control account impacted by Continuing Resolution and unfilled vacant positions (2) FY 2015 $1,507k, Year-End Labor and Overhead Allocations pass back. (3) FY 2016 $571k, Year-End Labor and Overhead Allocations pass back and efficiencies experienced in prior years were minimal in FY 2016 and did not continue. (4) FY 2017 $5,035k, primarily due to Labor usage efficiencies realized due to Facility Closure days “R” time in December (3-days), January (10-days), and February (5-days) for a total of 18 days, with the additional 2 days of “R” Time in May associated with the PUREX incident, vacancies and an increase in taking vacation during July. Additionally, labor rate variances are being realized within multiple disciplines within the LOE control accounts. This was partially off-set by an unfavorable fiscal year-end variance distribution of -$796k in September 2017. (5) FY 2018 -$187k, due to an increase in labor and overtime to support field activities in October -$274k and December -$640k with offsetting efficiencies in November within the 222-S Laboratory $727k. Impact: (1 – 3) No impact to other control accounts. The EACs were favorably impacted by Continuing Resolutions and vacancies in prior years. (4) No impact to other control accounts. The EAC was favorably impacted by the 20 days of “R” time realized and is not anticipated to continue. (5) No impact to other control accounts. The EAC was unfavorably impacted in October and December and favorably impacted in November. Monthly fluctuations will occur within these LOE accounts. Corrective Action: (1 – 3) Several vacant positions were filled in FY 2015 and FY 2016. The FY 2017 Budget was modified to reflect the anticipated support required for the year. (4) No corrective action required. The G&A under allocation due to the 18 days of “R” time was implemented in April via BCR RPP-17-102. (5) No corrective action required. The majority of this scope is LOE and will realize monthly fluctuations. 5.1.1.6 – Solid Waste Management $7,028k (LOE Control Accounts) Cause: (1) FY 2014 thru FY 2016, $6,246k – Prior year efficiencies due to this account being dependent upon the levels of waste generated and received from Operations, Projects, and Retrieval field activities. When waste is received by the treatment facilities, they have up-to 12 months to process, which causes monthly fluctuations in invoices received. Additionally, the full implementation of the Reusable Contaminated Equipment (RCE) Program was impacted due to CR in FY 2014. Further impacted in FY 2015 with the vacant planner, and re-assignment of 2 HPTs and 3 NCOs to support the Farm during the first half of the

year. The BAC was modified for FY 2017 to reflect the planned field execution strategy.

(2) FY 2017, $1,143k – Labor, Material, and Subcontractor usage efficiencies due to this account being dependent upon the levels of waste generated and received from Operations, Projects, and Retrieval field

activities. Field work in the first four months of FY 2017 has been impacted by Continuing Resolution and Facility Closure days “R” time in December (3-days), January (10-days), and February (5-days) for a

total of 18 days, with the additional 2 days of “R” Time in May associated with the PUREX incident. (3) FY 2018, -$361k – Labor usage inefficiencies in October -$80k to support RCE field activities and an increase in shipments to offsite treatment and disposal facilities in November -$108k and December -$172k. Impact: (1) No impact to other control accounts. The EAC was favorably impacted in prior years and has been updated to reflect the expected waste shipments from the field, treatment and disposal schedules from the treatment facilities, and staffing needs for FY 2017. (2) No impact to other control accounts. The EAC was favorably impacted by the 20 days of “R” time realized and is not anticipated to continue. (3) No impact to other control accounts. The EAC was unfavorably impacted in the 1st Quarter of FY 2018 and is not anticipated to continue. Corrective Action: (1) No corrective action required. The FY 2016 Budget was modified to reflect the reduced RCE Program and planned waste shipments from the field and treatment and disposal costs. The FY 2017 BAC was also modified to reflect the planned field execution strategy. This will mitigate further growth to the CTD variance. (2) No corrective action required. The G&A under allocation due to the 18 days of “R” time was implemented in April via BCR RPP-17-102. (3) No corrective action required. This LOE control account will realize monthly fluctuations.

SLIDE 125

CTD Cost Variance $12,879k (cont’d)

5.1.1.13 – Base Operations Support/Special Projects -$19,778k (LOE Control Accounts) Cause: (1) Production Operations Support Services, -$14,246k – labor and subcontractor usage inefficiencies due to:

a. TF-AOP-015 Response to Reported Odors or Unexpected Changes to Vapor Conditions in FY 2014. As a result, this control account has realized an increase in respiratory equipment procurements;

consumables; deployment of heat stress modules, Hanford Fire Department SCBA support, Crane and Rigging readiness-to-serve, NCO and IHT resources to man the Mask Issue Stations, and MSA Teamster support for transportation of the SCBA bottle to and from the Hanford Fire Department.

b. The HAMTC Stop Work and Court Order Injunction within the DST Farms in FY 2016, requiring additional staff for the use of SCBA when performing min-safe activities and an increase in SCBA bottle cleaning,

building SCBA bottle boxes and drying racks, and procurement of 100-30 minute SCBA bottles and 900 SCOTT AV3000 SCBA Masks. (2) Production Operations Central Shift Office, -$5,744k – labor usage inefficiencies due to:

a. Increased costs associated with round-the-clock valve pit temperature monitoring effective October 1, 2014 through March 31, 2015 set forth in procedure TO-040-790 Revision 8, Tank Farm Plant Operating

Procedure & Operations and training during Red Arrow in FY 2015 Q1.

b. Labor usage inefficiencies, NCOs within the Shift Operations Office due to delays associated with equipment failures and ability to perform Evaporator Campaigns and associated transfers. When NCOs are not

assigned to support discrete scope, they are assigned to support the manning and training for the Shift Relief Team and obtain their multi-certification requirements. Additionally, 12 NCOs were brought on board in January 2016 and charged their first three weeks of training to this account prior to being reassigned to the Farm Teams in February 2016. In addition, two IHTs are required per shift to support enhanced IH Monitoring as a result of the HAMTC Stop Work Order within the DST Farms.

c. HAMTC Stop Work Impacts within the DST Farms due to additional staff required for the use of SCBA when performing min-safe activities.

(3) HAMTC Standing Stop Work Impacts, -$417k – labor usage inefficiencies due to the HAMTC Stop Work Order and Court Order Injunctions impacting waste disturbing activities. Impact: No impact to other control accounts. The EAC has been unfavorably impacted with the increase in costs and has been updated to reflect the anticipated costs through FY 2018. Corrective Action: (1) a. Total FY 2015 Vapor cost impacts are unrecoverable as they were not adequately accounted for in Contract Modification 373 which definitized Vapor Impacts for FY 2015, as the FY 2015 Request for Equitable Adjustment (REA) negotiated FY 2015 Q3/Q4 costs using the Chemical Vapors impacts for FY 2015 Q1/Q2 proposal (CP-15-032) as a basis; vapor impacts were underrepresented during FY 2015 Q1/Q2 for this

account. FY 2016 cost impacts due to vapor issues addressed via Baseline Change Request RPP-16-179 which implemented Contract Modification 386 for FY 2016 Chemical Vapor Impacts.
b. A REA was submitted in September 2017 to ORP, addressing the HAMTC Stop Work and Court Order impacts. (CP-16-023)

(2) a. The FY 2016 and FY 2017 Budgets were modified to include the costs for the round-the-clock valve pit temperature monitoring from October – March.

b. No corrective action required. When discrete scope is performed, this account will realize a reduced utilization and will fluctuate monthly mitigating the cost variance.
c. A REA was submitted in September 2017 to ORP, addressing the HAMTC Stop Work and Court Order impacts. (CP-16-023)

(3) A REA was submitted in September 2017 to ORP, addressing the HAMTC Stop Work and Court Order impacts. (CP-16-023) This work package has been closed, no further actuals will be realized. 5.1.2.3 – 242-A Evaporator -$2,874k Cause: (1) FY 2014 -$2,105k – Labor and non-labor usage inefficiencies required to support emergent facility maintenance and enhancements. (2) FY 2015 $259k – Year-End Overhead Allocations pass back of $219k. (3) FY 2016 -$1,936k – Labor and non-labor usage inefficiencies required to support emergent facility maintenance and enhancements. (4) FY 2017 $1,262k – Labor usage efficiencies realized due to resources reassigned to Tank Farm Projects to support the 242-A Evaporator Integrity Assessment and Facility Closure days “R” time in December (3- days), January (10-days), and February (5-days) for a total of 18 days and with the additional 2 days of “R” Time in May associated with the PUREX incident. (5) FY 2018 -$355k – Labor usage inefficiencies due to an increase in labor/overtime to support completion of the Electrical Outage and maintenance activities prior to extreme winter conditions and prepare for start-up of the 242-A Evaporator Campaign EC-08. Impact: (1 – 3) No impact to other control accounts. The EAC was unfavorable impacted in prior years but did not continue in FY 2017. (4) No impact to other control accounts. The EAC was favorably impacted by the 20 days of “R” time realized and is not anticipated to continue. (5) No impact to other control accounts. The EAC was unfavorably impacted in the 1st Quarter FY 2018 and is not planned to continue. Corrective Action: (1 – 3) No corrective action required. The unfavorable cost variance is unrecoverable. (4) No corrective action required. The G&A under allocation due to the 18 days of “R” time was implemented in April via BCR RPP-17-102. (5) No corrective action required. This is primarily an LOE control account and will realize monthly fluctuations.

125

Production Operations CTD Cost Performance Overview

December 2017

SLIDE 126

126

Production Operations FY 2018 Spend Forecast

December 2017

CM Delta: -6.2%, actuals came in higher than anticipated for the current month. Labor -$557k, Material -$67k; Subcontracts -$89k; OCC $16k; and Overhead Allocations -$142k. Increase in labor/overtime and procurements to support completion of field activities. FY Spend Forecast Delta: -$2,421k, increase in spend forecast PDN Target Delta: -$2,425k, over Target

ACWP/ETC Oct-16 (3W) Nov-16 (4W) Dec-16 (5W) Jan-17 (4W) Feb-17 (4W) Mar-17 (5W) Apr-17 (4W) May-17 (4W) Jun-17 (5W) Jul-17 (4W) Aug-17 (4W) Sep-17 (6W) FY Spend Forecast PDN Target Delta Oct-17 10,650 16,176 13,525 11,401 14,415 16,668 15,041 18,235 13,336 13,368 16,259 15,305 174,377 Nov-17 10,650 15,789 13,439 11,780 14,227 17,322 15,000 18,142 13,319 13,449 16,261 15,266 174,643 Dec-17 10,650 15,789 14,277 11,757 14,661 17,142 14,858 18,147 13,993 13,652 16,619 15,520 177,064 174,639

2,425

Delta

103

386

839
2,421

Percentage

1.0%

2.4%

6.2%
1.4%

500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 Oct (4W) Nov (4W) Dec (4W) Jan (5W) Feb (4W) Mar (5W) Apr (4W) May (4W) Jun (4W) Jul (5W) Aug (4W) Sep (5W) Thousands

Materials, Sub-Contracts, ODC - Dollars by Month

ACWP ETC 934 858 944 919 918 934 935 932 953 912 899 895

200

400 600 800 1,000 1,200 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep

FTEs by Month

ACWP ETC

FY FTE Average = 918

PRODUCTION OPERATIONS FY 2018 WBS Level 4 OCT NOV DEC JAN ETC FEB ETC MAR ETC APR ETC MAY ETC JUN ETC JUL ETC AUG ETC SEP ETC Total 5.01.01.01 - Base Operations Project Mgmt 485,922 859,199 754,053 661,429 833,066 950,050 803,639 979,346 767,375 714,049 912,563 865,898 9,586,589 5.01.01.06 - Solid Waste Management 728,634 1,182,290 1,044,095 733,304 902,115 1,019,426 895,307 1,081,075 891,605 891,151 1,168,440 1,034,449 11,571,892 5.01.01.11 - Base Operations East Area Farms 1,833,656 2,821,724 2,646,974 1,950,903 2,487,883 2,897,046 2,405,675 2,955,180 2,303,888 2,249,976 2,938,024 2,788,140 30,279,070 5.01.01.12 - Base Operations West Area Farms 794,957 1,229,306 1,035,352 910,017 1,063,954 1,237,422 1,040,171 1,257,494 980,871 968,343 1,240,631 1,166,611 12,925,127 5.01.01.13 - Base Operations Support/Special Projects 1,759,059 2,406,725 2,326,747 1,925,854 2,108,392 2,524,416 2,437,203 3,328,018 1,935,745 2,120,642 2,819,893 2,433,059 28,125,754 5.01.02.02 - Tank Waste Volume Management 272,781 466,181 134,029 154,342 392,486 547,450 221,131 433,271 643,433 396,958 204,589 535,384 4,402,036 5.01.02.03 - 242-A Evaporator 694,927 1,085,124 920,207 758,803 943,478 1,146,167 972,777 1,153,420 1,085,147 763,063 1,006,688 988,968 11,518,768 5.01.02.06 - Effluent Treatment Facility 1,342,208 1,882,796 1,746,915 1,331,681 1,659,351 2,057,451 1,846,997 2,175,107 1,604,454 1,617,837 2,038,474 1,884,415 21,187,688 5.01.03.01 - 222-S Laboratory Facility 228,495 252,019 69,286 71,912

621,713

5.01.03.03 - 222-S Laboratory Facility Option Period 2 2,506,112 3,599,708 3,594,808 3,253,517 4,267,791 4,762,433 4,234,761 4,784,431 3,780,637 3,929,554 4,289,299 3,823,340 46,826,392 5.01.03.04 - 222-SA Facility Replacement 3,030 4,233 4,656 5,256 2,013

19,188

FY Spend Forecast 10,649,781 15,789,305 14,277,123 11,757,018 14,660,531 17,141,861 14,857,661 18,147,343 13,993,155 13,651,574 16,618,601 15,520,264 177,064,215

FY2018 Monthly Spend Forecast

SLIDE 127

127

Production Operations Key Deliverables

December 2017

FY 2018 Key Deliverables Baseline Forecast Improved Tank Farm Infrastructure

PBI-38.0.2.1 – Procure and Install the Analytical Instrument Thermal Desorption Unit (TDU) SEP 2018 AUG 2018 PBI-38.0.2.2 – Procure and Install the Analytical Instrument Gamma Energy Analyzer (GEA) SEP 2018 JUL 2018 PBI-38.0.2.3 – Procure and Install the Analytical Instrument Gas Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer (GC/MS) SEP 2018 MAY 2018 PBI-38.0.3.1 – Complete the 222-S Laboratory Facility Upgrade – HVAC SEP 2018 SEP 2018 PBI-38.0.3.2 – Complete the 222-S Laboratory Facility Upgrade – Site Preparation and Slab Foundation for the Non-Rad Laboratory SEP 2018 AUG 2018 PBI-38.0.3.3 – Complete the 222-S Laboratory Facility Upgrade – Room 4N SEP 2018 JUL 2018 PBI-38.0.7.1 – Complete the 222-S Laboratory Facility Upgrade Design for Ancillary Facility Addition SEP 2018 MAY 2018 PBI-38.0.7.2 – Complete the 222-S Laboratory Facility Upgrade Design for Ancillary Equipment Room Remodel SEP 2018 SEP 2018

Manage DST Space

PBI 37.0.1.1 – 242-A Evaporator Campaign 130,000 WVR (EC-08) SEP 2018 APR 2018 PBI 37.0.1.2 – 242-A Evaporator Campaign 130,000 WVR (EC-09) SEP 2018 JUL 2018 PBI 37.0.3.1 – Reduce LERF Inventory by 1,000,000 Gallons SEP 2018 FEB 2018 PBI 37.0.3.2 – Reduce LERF Inventory by 1,000,000 Gallons SEP 2018 APR 2018 PBI 37.0.3.3 – Reduce LERF Inventory by 1,000,000 Gallons SEP 2018 JUN 2018 PBI 37.0.3.4 – Reduce LERF Inventory by 1,000,000 Gallons SEP 2018 AUG 2018 Perform Eleven (11) DST to DST Transfers SEP 2018 OCT 2018 Perform Four (4) DST Recirculation MAY 2018 JUL 2018 Perform the AP Farm In-Process Leak Check/Level Rise of Tank AP-106 DEC 2017 NOV 2017

Maintenance

PBI 40.0.3 – Reusable Contaminated Equipment (RCE) – Disposition of Ten (10) items SEP 2018 AUG 2018

Note: Narrative in Blue denotes change from Prior Month.

SLIDE 128

128

Production Operations Accomplishments

December 2017

Accomplishments:

Production Operations completed 552 preventive maintenance and 182 corrective maintenance activities, held 18 Emergency Preparedness Operations Drills, and

performed 1,300 hours of housekeeping around the Tank Farms.

The Waste Operations group shipped 16 containers of mixed waste and 16 containers of low level waste to PermaFix Northwest; 10 containers of low level waste

and 3 containers of mixed waste to the Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility (ERDF), 3 containers of samples to off-site laboratories, 4 containers of recyclable material to the Centralized Consolidation/Recycling and 31 containers of hazardous waste to Stericycle, for a total of 83 containers to be recycled, samples, treated, and/or disposed.

The 222-S Laboratories brokered 892 samples to off-site commercial laboratories.

Look Ahead:

Complete the installation of the 222-S Restroom Shower Trailer. January
Complete the testing and turnover of the 219-S P-1 Pump Replacement at the 222-S Laboratory to Operations. (FY 2016 Carryover) January
Complete the External Transfer from the 219-S to the SY-102 DST. (FY 2016 Carryover) January
Receive the Inductively Coupled Plasma/Mass Spectrometer (ICP/MS) analytical equipment on Site. January
DST to DST Waste Transfer from Tank AP-106 to Tank AW-106. February
Complete the 1st LERF Campaign of FY 2018 reducing the LERF Inventory by 1,000,000 Gallons in support of PBI-37.0.3.1. February
Receive the Gas Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer (GC/MS) analytical equipment on Site supporting PBI-38.0.2.3. February
Receive the Fourier Transform IR/Thermo Gravity Analyzer (FTIR/TGA) analytical equipment on Site. February

SLIDE 129

December 2017 129

Production Operations Proposed Baseline Change Requests

BCR # WBS L5 FY18 PMB $ Impact ($k) Type Month BCR RPP-18-036 222-S Ancillary Equipment Facility Remodel – Conversion PP to WP (MR) 5.1.3.3.33 $642k Level 3 IMPLEMENTED BCR RPP-18-037 Redeploy C-105 NCOs and OEs (MR)  ST Team; Balance of Plant; ETF 5.1.1.12.2 5.1.1.13.13 5.1.2.6.8 $112.6k $143.7k $667.5k $923.8k Level 3 IMPLEMENTED BCR RPP-18-038 222-S Purge and Trap Replacement (MR) 5.1.3.3.16 $74k Level 3 IMPLEMENTED BCR RPP-18-043 ETF HVAC Chiller Procurement Scope Removal (MR) 5.1.2.6.8

$387k

Level 3 IMPLEMENTED BCR RPP-18-044 Administrative Changes for – December FY18  CAM Changes: Chapman Various $0k Admin IMPLEMENTED BCR RPP-18-TBD Waste Operations Scope Swap (60’ Trailer for Semi) (MR) 5.1.1.6.2.5 $0k Level 3 February BCR RPP-18-TBD ETF Air Compressor Installation (New Scope) – NTE Required  NTE Requested on 10/19/17 5.1.2.6.15 $700k TBD TBD BCR RPP-18-TBD ETF Air Relief Valves and SALDS Caissons (New Scope) – NTE Required  NTE for $150k to support Design was requested on 10/19/17 5.1.2.6.X $150k TBD TBD BCR RPP-18-TBD ETF HVAC Chiller Upgrade (New Scope) – NTE Required  NTE for $200k to support Design was requested on 10/19/17 5.1.2.6.X $200k TBD TBD BCR RPP-18-TBD ETF Reverse Osmosis Valve Replacements (New Scope) – NTE Required  NTE for $150k to support Design was requested on 10/19/17 5.1.2.6.X $150k TBD TBD BCR RPP-18-TBD ETF Dilute Caustic Tank Replacement (New Scope) – NTE Required  NTE for $210k to support Design was requested on 10/19/17 5.1.2.6.X $210k TBD TBD BCR RPP-18-TBD ETF Major Component Life Extension Replacement Evaluation (New Scope) – NTE Required  NTE for $200k to support Evaluation was requested on 10/19/17 5.1.2.6.X $200k TBD TBD

SLIDE 130

Improving Stable Worsening

130

Production Operations Key Realized Risks

December 2017

ID Title Description Org. Responsible Ownership Handling Actions Current Risk Level & Trend Current Status Status (since last update)

242AE- 0001-R 242-A Aging Facility and Equipment Requires Unplanned Repair

r Unanticipated

Upgrades The 242-A Evaporator is an aging facility. Various upgrades have been carried out to the facility, ancillary systems, buildings, and its associated equipment; needed to support DST waste volume reduction goals and sampling and analysis to support the regulatory process. A Risk exists that has been realized and is on-going, that due to the aging of the 242-A Facility and associated Equipment, replacements and upgrades may need to be performed

utside the planned scopes of work, impacting the

schedule and increasing costs. WRPS/ ORP

K. Smith
1. Maintain rigorous Preventative

Maintenance on facility and

equipment. (ongoing)
2. Ensure that sufficient spares are

retained on site. (ongoing)

3. Identify the most significant risk

equipment (ongoing)

4. BCRs to replace equipment.

(ongoing) Medium 3/23/17 - Air conditioner will be replaced. Examples include: RC-1, RC-2, RC-3; Rad Monitoring System; Vessel Ventilation Rad Monitoring, Ammonia Monitoring; Control Valve Upgrade; Underground Ventilation Ductwork; Lead Glass Shielding; Control room air conditioning, and fire alarm control

panel. (mainly schedule impact)

7/18/17 – Ownership changed to joint

wned after meeting with ORP (21 risks

changed to joint and 2 risks changed to ORP

wned).

11/1/17 – Replacement of control room air conditioning units are approximately 50%

complete. Replacement of RC1, RC2 and RC3

Radiation monitors is complete and efforts to plan installation of the RC1, RC2 and RC3 sample sink is initiated. Planning to complete phase II of the vessel vent IH stack monitoring system is initiated. Planning to complete replacement of the vessel vent Radiation monitoring system is initiated. Stable 242AE- 0012-R MCS Computer System Partial Failure Project B-534 purchased the monitoring and control system (MCS) in 1988, and installed it in the early 1990s, during the five-year environmental shutdown. The MCS is a distributed control system used to monitor and control equipment in the 242-A Evaporator along with related portions of the DST farm facilities, including LERF. Two partial upgrades of the MCS were performed before 1999, but the bulk of the multiplexer (MUX) input and output hardware remained unchanged from 1988. WRPS/ ORP

K. Smith
1. Continue to maintain suppliers

list

2. Upgrade MSC

High 3/23/17 - Minimal increase due to AC system failure. 10/10/17- A partial failure occurred resulting in a 1.5 day delay. This was a minor

ccurrence but the root cause remains

unknown. Stable WASTE- 0009-R Not Having the Ability to Pump Annulus per Pumping Guide Regulations Pumping the annulus per regulations of ecology, the pumping guide says you can complete annulus pumping in 10 days. Right now engineering has realistically proposed pumping the annulus to take 27 days. Plans start to finish would be over a year. The approximate estimate is $5 million ORP

G. Trenchard
1. Spare parts
2. Lessons learned from AY-102

(ongoing)

3. Execute BCR to begin design

(complete) High 08/14/17 – A register has been built for the Annulus Pump Proof of Concept Project. Stable ETFOP- 0030-R Thin Film Dryer System Failure (Joint owned) Current spares for the rotor and the vessel are being

maintained. A risk exists that the rotor and/or vessel fail

causing replacement to occur. WRPS/ ORP

R. Valle
1. Maintain Spares
2. Weekly PMs on the rotor

High Stable

SLIDE 131

131

Production Operations NTE Tracking Report and Contract Change Proposal Log

December 2017

SLIDE 132

132

Production Operations Proposed Issues/Challenges/Opportunities

December 2017

Note: Narrative in Blue denotes change from Prior Month.

ISSUES:

Vapors Lawsuit/HAMTC Memorandum of Agreement (MOA)

Increased costs and schedule impacts.
FY 2016 Scope Deferrals have been identified. BCR RPP-16-192 “FY 2016 & FY 2017 Q1 Work Scope Deferrals - HAMTC Stop Work” was submitted to ORP.
August 2016, A copy of the draft BCR was provided during the ORP Performance Review. BCR was implemented in September 2016.
May 2017, agreement was made with HAMTC and WRPS regarding the IH Control and Monitoring Plan for the upcoming 242-A Evaporator Campaigns EC-06 and EC-07. Efforts are under

way to implement the agreed upon actions and brief employees.

June 2017, a corridor was installed for Enhanced IH Controls and Monitoring during EC-06 to support HAMTC concerns. Zero budget CACNs were opened to capture the costs for future REA
consideration. The corridor was removed after completion of EC-06.
July 2017, due to the change in execution strategy for EC-06 and EC-07, back-to-back campaigns will no longer be achievable. BCR RPP-17-150 was implemented drawing down MR for the

Pre-Requisit activities required for EC-07. This activity was initially returned to MR in BCR RPP-17-026 when the execution strategy change to support back-to-back campaigns.

September 2017, an REA was submitted to ORP addressing the HAMTC Stop Work and Court Order impacts. (CP-16-023)
Contract Negotiations are pending.

222-SL Non-Rad Facility Construction – ORP Direction Pending

October Status:

2 - Construction Bids were received
11/7/17 – Sent an e-mail to WRPS Contracts to set up a meeting with ORP to discuss path forward
11/13/17 – A meeting was held with ORP, Contracts, and Project Controls to discuss the following items:

 Receive ORP agreement on the path forward  Discuss ORPs requirements as the Project value exceeds $10M (GPP)  Receive an NTE to award the Construction Contract and initiate site mobilization and construction activities for FY18  Submit the Final Proposal Package for the full scope (FY18 – FY19) to ORP.  Negotiate Proposal and implement into the baseline

The meeting adjourned with two actions:

 ORP Contracts was going to discuss the $10M issue with ORP Project Controls and get back to WRPS Contracts as to the correct path forward.  WRPS Contracts is going to move forward on submitting the Proposal, which will be based on the average of the two Construction Bids received. November Status:

Letter of Direction from ORP along with an NTE is Pending.
Received action from ORP to scale down the Facility to keep it within $10M. Review of options are underway.
Update Proposal planned to be submitted to ORP in December 2017. Proposal on Hold.

December Status:

The 222-S Laboratory Team and Project Management held a meeting with ORP and RL to outline the guidelines of GPP. A flowchart was provided to help WRPS and ORP determine what

constitutes as Other Project Cost (not included in the $10M GPP). WRPS Engineering and Project Management are reviewing the RFP and Design to determine the path forward.

SLIDE 133

133

Production Operations Proposed Issues/Challenges/Opportunities

December 2017

Note: Narrative in Blue denotes change from Prior Month.

ISSUES:

ETF Emergent Scope – ORP Direction Pending

August 2017, a list of emergent scope was identified for the ETF and submitted to WRPS Contract to provide contract determination as “New Scope” or “Risk Realized (MR)”.
September 2017, the list of emergent scope was briefed with ORP during the Monthly Performance Review for August Reporting.
October 2017, A meeting was held with ORP to brief them on the Emergent Scope and WRPS Contract determination; an e-mail was submitted to ORP Contracts requesting NTEs and Letter
f Direction to proceed.
November 2017, pending ORP Direction; a meeting was held with ORP discussing CP-18-005 and the need to receive an NTE and Letter of Direction on 11/27/17 and answer any questions

they may have or need in order to make a determination.

FY 2018 Scope:

 ETF Air Compressor Design, Fabrication, Installation ($700k)  ETF HVAC Chiller Upgrade – Design Only ($200k)  ETF Major Component Life Extension Replacement Evaluation ($200k)

FY 2019 Scope (to be submitted during the FY 2019 Proposal):

 ETF HVAC Chiller Upgrade – Procurement  ETF Reverse Osmosis Valve Replacements  ETF Dilute Caustic Tank Replacement  ETF Air Relief Valves and SALDS Caissons  ETF Rest Room Trailer

SLIDE 134

Maintenance December 2017

PBI-40.0.01 – Completed 2750E Switchgear Replacement

SLIDE 135

135

Maintenance Lots Happening

December 2017

M0-173 Facility Reconfiguration 2750E Rain Gutter and Heat Trace Installation 2750E Elevator Repair 2750E Tree Trimming

SLIDE 136

136

Maintenance Services

December 2017

Maintenance Program Scope

Craft Support to Production Operations, Tank

Farm Projects, and Retrieval Closure

Preventive Maintenance
Corrective Maintenance
Work Planning and Control
Work Package Planning
EAM System & Processes
Facilities and Property Management
Facility Services ie: Electrical/Roofs
PMs, Repairs & Upgrades
Rental Equipment Management
Material Asset Management
Spare Parts –Receipt & Disbursements
Tool Cribs Inventory & Issuance
Warehousing & Tracking
Maintenance Programs
Maintenance Performance Indicators
Procedures, Training Support, etc.
Crane and Rigging
Corrective Actions / PERs

Maintenance Current Month FTEs (December) – 380.7

Performing Organization Responsible Program Reg OT Reg OT Reg OT Reg OT Reg OT Reg OT DIRECT 2B - ESH&Q 0.4 0.4

2C - Project Integration
2F - SST Retrievals

11.8 28.0 1.7 0.2 0.2 40.0 1.9 2K - Engineering 0.0 0.0

2L - Production Operations

33.9 0.3 122.5 9.9 0.7 0.4 156.8 10.9 2M - Tank Farm Projects 7.2 0.2 25.0 3.6 0.1 0.0 32.2 3.9 2P - One System 0.4 0.4

2Q - Organization Perf Improvement

0.0 0.0

2R - LAWPS

0.0 0.0

2T - Chief Technology Office/Closure

0.2 (0.4) 0.2 (0.4) 2U - Maintenance 2.2

7.0
33.9

1.6 16.0 0.4 6.3 0.6 65.3 2.5 INDIRECT XA - Workforce Resources

XB - ESH&Q
XC - Project Integration

0.3 0.3

XD - Business Operations
XH - External Affairs

0.0 0.0

XJ - General Counsel
XU - Maintenance

0.3 0.1 27.7 3.5 28.9 0.2 1.1 57.9 3.7 XY - Labor Relations 0.6 0.6

NOT ASSIGNED

4.2 0.2 4.2 0.2 Grand Total FTEs 2.2

60.2

0.6 243.1 20.1 44.9 1.4 8.0 0.6 358.3 22.4

NOTE: OT is 6.0%

2U000 - Maintenance 2UA00 - Work Control 2UB00 - WRPS Craft Suppt 2UC00 - Maint Programs Total Maint FTEs 2UD00 - Maint Cont Assur

SLIDE 137

137

Maintenance Performance Overview – CM & FYTD

December 2017

CM Schedule Variance: within threshold CM Cost Variance: $-335K

The unfavorable CM cost variance is primarily (-$154K) due to increased subcontracted support. MSAs Crane & Riggings (LOE) work

activities associated with HIHTL removal in C Farm as well as removal of pump and jumpers in DST AW103 have increased with complexity and weather impacts. Additionally, AUW and Capital projects (segregated, not in this cost account) where construction forces are utilized, have basic crane standby costs billed against this cost account. This is due to cranes being held in the tank farms rather than being removed as an efficiency improvement, reducing transportation costs.

Additionally, the ETF/LERF/TEDF Spare Parts cost account unfavorable variance (-$97K) is due to increased material usage. Additional filters

for ETF facility operation were procured and costed as a precursor for the next operational campaign.

Values WBSL5 Title CM BCWS CM BCWP CM ACWP CM SV CM CV FYTD BCWS FYTD BCWP FYTD ACWP FYTD SV FYTD CV FYTD SPI FYTD CPI 5.01.01.01.03 - Work Planning & Control 245 245 208 37 1,012 691 496

321

195 0.68 1.39 5.01.01.13.02 - Tank Farms Spare Parts Program 148 148 202

53

442 442 619

177

1.00 0.71 5.01.01.10.01 - TOC Direct Facilities Support 599 512 570

87
58

1,776 2,666 2,415 890 251 1.50 1.10 5.01.05.06.04 - Facility and Property Management

5.01.02.06.06 - ETF/LERF/TEDF Spare Parts Program
5.01.01.16.01 - Maintenance Program Management & Oversight FY15
5.01.01.13.12 - TOC Tool Crib Support Services

135 135 106

29

403 403 301

102

1.00 1.34 5.01.02.03.02 - 242-A Evaporator Spare Parts 15 15

3
18

44 44 21

23

1.00 2.13 5.01.03.01.02 - 222-S Laboratory Spare Parts 14 14

20
34

42 42 13

29

1.00 3.22 5.01.01.17.01 - MSA J.3 UBS Services Crane and Rigging 361 361 515

154

1,076 1,076 1,550

474

1.00 0.69 5.01.01.16.02 - Maintenance Program Management & Oversight 253 253 275

22

754 754 774

20

1.00 0.97 5.01.01.10.06 - Fall Protection Program

1

1 1

1.11

5.01.01.10.05 - Maintenance Support to Production Operations 305 305 274

31

908 908 745

163

1.00 1.22 5.01.01.17.02 - MSA J.3 UBS Services, Fleet 172 172 196

24

514 514 430

84

1.00 1.20 5.01.02.06.09 - ETF/LERF/TEDF Spare Parts Program 13 13 110

97

40 40 269

229

1.00 0.15 5.01.02.06.11 - ETF/LERF/TEDF Spare Parts Program - DO NOT USE

5.01.01.10.07 - TOC Equip. Rental & Property Excess & Disposal

178 178 255

78

529 529 542

13

1.00 0.98 Total 2,439 2,353 2,688

86
335

7,540 8,111 8,175 570

65

1.08 0.99

SLIDE 138

138

Maintenance Performance Overview – CTD and Spend Forecast

December 2017

CTD Cost Variance: $3,171K

$888K TOC Direct Facilities Support, labor resource utilization, delays in hiring in FY15 and results from FY17 CR.
$652K Tank Farm Spare Parts Program, impacted w/ reduced spending effecting essential restocking which results in a program credit. Min to Max levels evaluated for changes and

restocking needs.

$685K Work Planning & Control The favorable CTD cost variance is primarily due lower labor hours than planned for Work Package scope. In addition the project planned for higher

subcontract effort in the final months of the year to support software system (TFMSS to EAM) upgrades, resulting in a under run for this level of effort account.

$573K Crane & Rigging, reduced usage of subcontracted MSA services crane and rigging services in TOC base program support. Crane & Rigging services have increased in support
f Capital and Authorized Un-priced Work (AUW) scope, reducing base service costs.

Current Month FY Spend Forecast, $-13k, -0.09% PDN Target Delta, -$119K

Increased Material dollars to support TOC Spares

WBSL5 Title CTD BCWS CTD BCWP CTD ACWP CTD SV CTD CV CTD SPI CTD CPI BAC TCPI CTD 5.01.01.01.03 - Work Planning & Control 14,477 14,372 13,687

105

685 0.99 1.05 16,547 1.00 5.01.01.13.02 - Tank Farms Spare Parts Program 6,318 6,318 5,666

652

1.00 1.12 7,788 1.07 5.01.01.10.01 - TOC Direct Facilities Support 26,882 26,876 25,988

6

888 1.00 1.03 32,718 0.91 5.01.05.06.04 - Facility and Property Management 35,244 35,244 35,232

12

1.00 1.00 35,244

5.01.02.06.06 - ETF/LERF/TEDF Spare Parts Program

1,517 1,517 885

633

1.00 1.71 1,517

5.01.01.16.01 - Maintenance Program Management & Oversight FY15

520 520 498

22

1.00 1.04 520

5.01.01.13.12 - TOC Tool Crib Support Services

4,048 4,048 3,529

519

1.00 1.15 5,389 0.97 5.01.02.03.02 - 242-A Evaporator Spare Parts 176 176 184

8

1.00 0.95 323 1.12 5.01.03.01.02 - 222-S Laboratory Spare Parts 624 624 257

367

1.00 2.42 766 0.75 5.01.01.17.01 - MSA J.3 UBS Services Crane and Rigging 13,641 13,641 13,068

573

1.00 1.04 17,223 1.20 5.01.01.16.02 - Maintenance Program Management & Oversight 5,151 5,151 5,886

735

1.00 0.88 7,662 0.96 5.01.01.10.06 - Fall Protection Program

1

1 1

1.11

273 1.03 5.01.01.10.05 - Maintenance Support to Production Operations 5,318 5,318 4,932

386

1.00 1.08 8,340 1.10 5.01.01.17.02 - MSA J.3 UBS Services, Fleet 2,476 2,476 2,713

237

1.00 0.91 4,186 0.97 5.01.02.06.09 - ETF/LERF/TEDF Spare Parts Program 313 313 291

22

1.00 1.08 445 (1.32) 5.01.02.06.11 - ETF/LERF/TEDF Spare Parts Program - DO NOT USE

5.01.01.10.07 - TOC Equip. Rental & Property Excess & Disposal

1,613 1,613 2,221

607

1.00 0.73 3,375 1.00 Total 118,320 118,209 115,038

110

3,171 1.00 1.03 142,316 1.01

Values in $K ACWP/ETC Oct-17 (4W) Nov-17 (5W) Dec-17 (4W) Jan-18 (4W) Feb-18 (4W) Mar-18 (5W) Apr-18 (4W) May-18 (5W) Jun-18 (4W) Jul-18 (4W) Aug-18 (5W) Sep-18 (5W) FY Spend Forecast PDN Target Delta Aug-17 2,284 3,478 2,261 1,899 2,323 2,735 2,323 3,138 2,244 2,210 2,820 2,611 30,326 Sep-17 1,658 3,183 2,460 3,363 2,202 2,697 2,594 3,016 2,573 2,473 2,892 2,583 31,696 Oct-17 1,819 4,376 2,921 2,136 2,007 2,647 2,642 3,098 2,367 2,398 2,687 3,051 32,148 Nov-17 1,819 3,668 2,751 2,153 2,537 2,667 2,640 3,181 2,710 2,377 2,654 2,633 31,790 Dec-17 1,819 3,668 2,688 2,355 2,433 2,943 2,404 2,989 2,500 2,201 2,659 3,119 31,777 31,658

119

Delta

63

202

104

277

236
192
210
177

5 486

13

Percentage

2.3%

9.4%

4.1%

10.4%

9.0%
6.0%
7.8%
7.4%

0.2% 18.5%

0.0%

SLIDE 139

139

Maintenance Estimate-at-Completion

December 2017

Level 5 WBS Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 ETC Total FY Spend Forecast BAC FY18 PDN ETC/PDN Delta 5.1.1.1.3 - Work Planning & Control 104 184 208 141 287 254 183 239 272 243 273 265 2,156 2,652 3,082 2,810 158 5.1.1.10.1 - TOC Direct Facilities Support 270 1575 570 517 803 751 607 632 668 731 757 954 6,420 8,835 7,613 8,336 (499) 5.1.1.10.5 - Maintenance Support to Production Operations 154 317 274 214 282 343 301 355 285 281 354 338 2,753 3,498 3,931 3,857 359 5.1.1.10.6 - Fall Protection Program

1
1

35 35 28 28 28 28 54 27 265 266 273 268 2 5.1.1.10.7 - TOC Equip. Rental & Property Excess & Disposal 135 152 255 189 222 198 188 198 168 170 187 181 1,701 2,243 2,291 2,249 6 5.1.1.13.12 - TOC Tool Crib Support Services 312 105 202 319

57

284 14 107 299 53 157 186 1,363 1,981 1,744 1,880 (102) 5.1.1.13.2 - Tank Farms Spare Parts Program 102 92 106 132 142 154 155 159 149 150 159 175 1,376 1,677 1,912 1,708 31 5.1.1.16.2 - Maintenance Program Management & Oversight 212 287 275 180 265 318 284 357 281 261 333 315 2,594 3,368 3,265 3,275 (93) 5.1.1.17.1 - MSA J.3 UBS Services Crane and Rigging 399 636 515 399 317 399 473 620 113 116 131 438 3,005 4,556 4,657 4,564 9 5.1.1.17.2 - MSA J.3 UBS Services, Fleet 98 136 196 194 175 175 175 226 175 175 226 226 1,749 2,179 2,223 2,179

5.1.2.3.2 - 242-A Evaporator Spare Parts

17 7

3

11

33

13 23 5 18 16 14 132 152 191 187 35 5.1.2.6.9 - ETF/LERF/TEDF Spare Parts Program 1 158 110 17

44
13
24

2 2

36
3
1

(99) 169 171 168 (2) 5.1.3.1.2 - 222-S Laboratory Spare Parts 16 17

20

39 6 13 8 42 54 11 14 1 188 201 184 180 (21) Total Spend Forecast 1819 3668 2,688 2,355 2,433 2,943 2,404 2,989 2,500 2,201 2,659 3,119 23,602 31,777 31,538 31,658 (119) Direct ETC ACWP

SLIDE 140

140

Maintenance Portfolio Management

December 2017

Implemented BCRs for December FY18 None

FY18 BUDGET

With C/O

(BAC) FY18 EAC (Act + Fcst)

Updated 10/16/17

BCRs PROCESSE D or PENDING (BAC) FY18 ADJ BUDGET with c/o (BAC) FY18 EAC (Act + Fcst) FY18 PDN, R2 (Funds) PDN - FY EAC Delta EAC CHANGE FROM PRIOR MO

2U Maintenance

272

5.1.1.1.3 - Work Planning & Control c/o 2,867 2,675 2,867 2,652 2,810 158 (23)

273

5.1.1.10.1 - TOC Direct Facilities Support c/o 8,509 8,510 8,509 8,835 8,336 (499) 325

274

5.1.1.10.5 - Maintenance Support to Production Operations 3,931 3,860 3,931 3,498 3,857 359 (361)

275

5.1.1.10.6 - Fall Protection Program 273 268 273 266 268 2 (2)

276

5.1.1.10.7 - TOC Direct Equipment Rentals 2,291 2,302 2,291 2,243 2,249 6 (59)

277

5.1.1.13.2 - Tank Farms Spare Parts Program 1,912 1,992 1,912 1,981 1,880 (102) (10)

278

5.1.1.13.12 - TOC Tool Crib Support Services 1,744 1,683 1,744 1,677 1,708 31 (6)

279

5.1.1.16.2 - Maintenance Program Management & Oversight 3,265 3,222 3,265 3,368 3,275 (93) 146

280

5.1.1.17.1 - MSA J.3 UBS Services Crane and Rigging 4,657 4,564 4,657 4,556 4,564 9 (8)

281

5.1.1.17.2 - MSA J.3 UBS Services, Fleet 2,223 2,178 2,223 2,179 2,179

282

5.1.2.3.2 - 242-A Evaporator Spare Parts 191 159 191 152 187 35 (6)

283

5.1.2.6.9 - ETF/LERF/TEDF Spare Parts Program 171 179 171 169 168 (2) (9)

284

5.1.3.1.2 - 222-S Laboratory Spare Parts 184 200 184 201 180 (21) 1

285

Total Maintenance 32,218 31,790 32,218 31,777 31,658 (119) (13)

Line No.

EXPENSE

Fiscal Year 2018 Cost Estimate

As of Nov 2017 Month-end CONTROL ACCT SUMMARY (WBS LEVEL 5) by Responsible Org Group

c/o - carryover

As of December 2017 Month-end

December - Prelim

1/15/2018

SLIDE 141

141

Maintenance Monthly Tracking – Delinquent PMs & CMs

December 2017

PM Goal: 50% reduction from FY17 (Sept) of 22 PMs Goal of 11 or less by end of FY18 CM Goal: Maintenance to establish technical basis for CM steady state - TBD

Team Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept

AN 2 AZ 8 5 1 FACILITIES 4 7 8 ETF 9 23 7 EV 26 23 17 LABS 10 2 5 Projects WS R&C 1 ST 2 3 2

Totals 59 66 40 Team Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept

AN 6 4 3 AZ 7 8 9 FACILITIES 4 5 6 ETF 20 21 21 EV 7 5 1 LABS 19 19 21 Projects 2 2 1 WS R&C 3 3 3 ST 5 5 7 Transfer

Totals 73 72 72

Delinquent PMs - FY2018 CM Backlog - FY2018

SLIDE 142

142

Maintenance Monthly Tracking – Completed PMs & CMs

December 2017

Total FY CMs: 115 Total FY PMs: 1,690

Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Field Work Complete - CMs 40 43 32 Field Work Complete - PMs 589 628 473

SLIDE 143

143

Maintenance Monthly Performance

December 2017

WRPS Spares – December Performance

Material Transactions Cost Performance

Total material issued $43,289 Total material received $185,551

Month Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep FYTD Total Matl Issued $250,376 $309,144 $43,289 $602,809 Matl Receipt $536,900 $517,794 $185,551 $1,240,245 Difference ($286,524) ($208,650) ($142,262) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ($637,436) Fiscal Year 2018 Month Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep FYTD Total Issued 88 129 79 296 Receipt 98 69 21 188 TOTAL 186 198 100 484 Fiscal Year 2018

Total Spare Material Issued $43,289.06 (highlighted yellow) Total Spare Material Received $185,551.50 Spare material issued over $1,000.00 Circuit, manual reset, quantity 24 Detector, pancake, Mica, Alpha, Beta, Gamma w/housing, quantity 2 Pump, ¾ hp, 115/230 vac, quantity 2 Compressor, rotary maintenance kit, quantity 2 Cartridge, quantum, tex polishing, quantity 3 Light, UV, quantity 2 Light, A10 UV photo-oxidization, quantity 2 Rack, 19 in, 5 slot, terminal block, quantity 1 Power supply, module, 12 VDC, quantity 1 Spare material received over $1,000.00 Fittings, SS Pipe, ¾ in, quantity 12 Circuit, Manual reset power, quantity 24 Spare material issued over $2,000.00 Transmitter, Differential pressure, quantity 1 Spare material received over $2,000.00 Light, UV, Millipore, quantity 6 Filter, pneumatic, ¾ in, quantity 9 Spare material issued over $3,000.00 HEPA Filters, Radial, quantity 16 Spare material issued over $5,000.00 Controller, mass flow, quantity 2 Spare material issued over $6,000.00 Controller, mass flow, quantity 2 Spare material received over $6,000.00 Switch, electronic, 1-1.5IPS/4.20MA, quantity 4 Spare material issued over $8,000.00 Drum, W/27 meters platinum-iridium wire, quantity 2 Spare material received over $9,000.00 Module, Input, analog, ABB type, quantity 5

SLIDE 144

144

Maintenance GSA & Commercial Leased Vehicles

December 2017

FY17 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Commercial Leases 140 140 140 130 GSA Leases 306 306 306 316

10 Commercial vehicles were replaced wit h10 GSA vehicles, cost transitional improvement

SLIDE 145

145

Maintenance Accomplishments / Look Ahead

December 2017

Accomplishments FYTD

M0-280 Fire Riser Leak Repair
2101HV HVAC Ducting and Replacement
2713S Fire alarm battery box upgrade
Purchased 9 leased trailers
2750E D Wing Switchgear Replacement (PBI-40.0.01)
2750E Elevator Repair
M0-173 Facility Reconfiguration

Look Ahead

Complete 2750E Tree Trimming
Complete M0-280 Facility Upgrades
Complete 2704HV Roof Repair SOW
Complete 2750E B103 Conference Room upgrade
Complete 2750E Rain Gutter and Heat Trace Installation
Complete Tool Crib & Fleet EAM Module Implementation

SLIDE 146

146

Maintenance Challenges/Issues/Opportunities

December 2017

Challenges Reductions in Delinquent Preventive Maintenance & Corrective Maintenance Backlog

Emphasis and teamwork approach will be the focus for the PM backlog, continued farm team attention and

priority.

New and/or upgraded facilities are needed, new maintenance shop is needed (Carpenter & Paint shop highest

priority)

Additional hiring will need infrastructure support (i.e. Facilities, vehicles, maintenance).
Aging Facilities, attain a proactive risk approach to facility maintenance.

1. 2704HV Roof Replacement 2. 2750E Water Lines Issues

None at this time

Opportunities Equipment and Vehicle Tracking

GPS tracking of WRPS rental equipment.
Vehicle utilization improvements related to vehicle usage, types, and routes continues to be worked.
Material excessing continues.
Additional WRPS staging center for controlled material issuance.

Charging Station

Installing electric vehicle charging stations at 2750E and 2704HV should be evaluated in FY18.

SLIDE 147

147

Maintenance FY18 Planning – FY18 PEMP

December 2017

PBI-40.0 CLIN 2 East Area Facility Maintenance Performance Fee value is established at $500,000 the FY 2018 fee pool

1. Complete replacement of the 2750E Switchgear by June 30, 2018. The Contractor shall earn $250,000 upon completion.

Work scope/completion criteria: This is an electrical upgrade to replace the aging infrastructure at 2750E located in the 200 East

Area. The switchgear is original to the building and beyond its service life, replacement parts are no longer available, the installation

does not meet the requirements of the National Electrical Code and the arc flash incident energy exceeds the amount allowable for maintenance to perform preventative maintenance (PM) on the equipment. The main 13.8 kV service and switchgear equipment needs to be removed and a new larger transformer (500k VA and 225kVA) and new switchgear installed. The new larger capacity equipment will allow maintenance to perform PMs and support future expansion of the building and increased occupancy. B-wing switchgear is currently scheduled to be complete in FY 2017 with the replacement to D-wing switchgear to be completed in FY 2018. Installation of a new service entrance rated enclosed circuit breaker in B-wing will serve the new power panel in D-Wing. Completion document: Letter transmitting the performance expectation completion notice and copy of the work order signature page(s) approved through Field Work Supervisor.

2. Complete repair of the 2704-HV roof by September 30, 2018. The Contractor shall earn $250,000 upon completion.

Work scope/completion criteria: This is a roof repair to the aging infrastructure at 2704-HV. The building is 24 years old and part of

ur aging infrastructure. 2704-HV is the largest administrative building for WRPS, housing many different groups. Maintaining this

building is vital for WRPS moving forward. The roof is the original to the building and beyond its service life. The roofing material is ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM) and will be replaced with a similar product. Completion document: Letter transmitting the performance expectation completion notice and copy of the work order signature page approved through Field Work Supervisor