[PPT] - Project Managers Assessment Safety and Health Through January 31, PowerPoint Presentation

SLIDE 1

SLIDE 2

Safety and Health Through January 31, 2018, WRPS Tank Operations Contract had worked 4,998,475 hours (358 days) without a Lost Time Workday Injury, and 1,104,044 hours (76 days) since the last Recordable case. The Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 cumulative performance indicators for Recordable cases (0.11) and DART cases (0.00) surpassed the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management (DOE-EM) goals of 1.10 and 0.60, respectively. Additionally, the 12-month rolling average safety rates remained low, with a rate of 0.16 for Recordable cases and 0.04 for DART cases. Project Manager’s Assessment Overall performance for the Tank Operations Contract (TOC) is favorable with a cumulative-to-date cost performance index (CPI) of 1.01 and schedule performance index (SPI) of 0.99. The FY 2018 CPI is 0.99 with the FY SPI at 0.93. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of River Protection (ORP) notified the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) that the double-shell tank (DST) AY-102 will be permanently closed. ORP was required by Ecology to empty enough waste from the tank to determine the cause of the leak by spring 2017. After emptying as much radioactive waste as possible and inspecting one area of the bottom of the inner shell, Hanford officials suspected that it has widespread

damage. Due to the extent of damage, it is unlikely that the tank can be repaired and returned to service.

Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System General: In the first quarter of FY 2018, on October 23, 2017, the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an optimized LAWPS facility that would deviate significantly from the previous LAWPS design. As a result, a Stop Work Order was issued to the Architect Engineer (A/E) directing them to cease work on all previous design approximately two months ago. This process required significant time to ensure it was communicated effectively, thus the associated costs continued until the official notice was delivered and have been discussed in the detailed variance analysis reports. During this period, January 2018, WRPS continued to work with the Subject Matter Experts and the A/E on optimizing the design strategy scope, schedule and

estimates. This work is on-going into February 2018 when the optimized detail plan is expected to be issued.

Design: Design changes are currently being planned and a detailed plan is expected to be issued in February 2018. Permitting: Significant changes discussed above in the “General” section will impact future permitting efforts however WRPS and ORP have been working with WDOE to formulate an integrated phased approach that considers LAWPS, TSCR and Tank Farm Upgrades. Integrated Testing: Significant changes discussed above in the “General” section impact the overall testing strategy and changes are being planned. New testing requirements will be determined when the system specification/design is more mature. The last test for the Integrated Scale Test was completed in December while the associated report is currently under development. WRPS is de-scoping the Cross Flow Filter (CFF) Foulant Testing. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) continued working on completing the remaining carryover testing scope from FY 2017, which consists of writing the reports. Procurement (Long Lead Equipment): With the change in design strategy, WRPS is currently suspending design of the LLE and, as needed, will issue a formal change

f direction to the various subcontractors when the system specification/design is more mature. The Bridge Crane 90% design package was received last period in
December. Procurement was cancelled and updated the POP to this period in January to ensure no additional charges. Xomox valves are planned to be suspended

then turned on later with a new release for the new design. ASME Tanks are planned to be de-scoped (i.e. contract terminated for convenience). AECOM design of the CFF and IX has stopped, the current plan is to issue a formal stop work notice and open new releases when needed. January 2018 2

Project Manager’s Assessment

SLIDE 3

3

Project Manager’s Assessment (cont.)

Construction: The LAWPS quantities based on the revised site layout are being aligned to the revised schedule that is being developed. The revised quantities and revise schedule will support the future proposals. WRPS continues to work on drafting Request For Proposals (RFPs) for the waste site removal scope. The revised Site Preparation RFP will be a future effort. Key Upcoming Activities: WRPS’s main focus is working with the A/E to detail plan the design change schedule. The detail plan from the A/E will supplement the WRPS cost and schedule proposal to DOE as part of the CP-18-007 submittal in March 2018. The site geotechnical subcontract is expected to be awarded next period in February. SST Retrieval C-105 Retrieval: The engineering Retrieval Completion Report (RCR) was completed January 23, 2018. The C-105 in-tank Camera/CAD Modeling System video activity was completed February 2, 2018. The videos will be used to calculate the certified residual waste volume and support development of the post-retrieval Tank Sampling and Analysis Plan. During the work-planning package review it was determined that planners needed to remove the caustic sampling leg out of Riser

2. The work package will include instructions to modify the existing Riser 2 work platform in readiness of post-retrieval sampling.

C Farm Lay-up: Crews disconnected power, signal and control wiring to non-C-105 hydraulic power units (HPUs). Next, workers will begin disconnecting hydraulic hoses from the hydraulic power units and prepare the units to be removed from the farm. The HPUs will be staged in a radioactive material area outside the farm for crews to drain the hydraulic fluids and prepared for disposal. Hose-in-Hose Transfer Line (HIHTL) Removals: Crews began working on the HIHTL removal shield plates and hose barns covering eight hoses between the POR104 valve box and Tank C-105. AY-102 Recovery: The AY-102 Project received verbal direction to submit a baseline change request to replace scope for pumping the annulus liquid waste to another DST with a rinse of the residual waste. The new scope will include the addition of 20,000-30,000 gallons of raw water and recirculation of liquid waste in the annulus to the primary tank during rinsing operations, followed by a transfer of the rinse liquid to Tank AP-102. Rinse operations will conclude with a caustic addition and transfer of the residual primary tank liquid to AP-102. The AY-102 Project developed draft descriptions for execution of additional scope to execute remaining project commitments. The additional scope summarized below includes removal of soluble radionuclides and chemical constituents by application of a tank rinse, and preliminary research for potential placement of a temporary controlled low strength material fill to address interim waste stabilization requirements pending closure actions to be determined at a later date.

The project requested approval to execute a raw water rinse of the tank waste using the extended reach sluicer system, followed by a caustic addition to the

primary tank and annulus. Rinse water and caustic added to the primary tank, will be mixed with annulus liquid waste by operation of the annulus pumping

system. The additional liquid waste created by waste rinse operations and caustic addition will be transferred to AP-102 using the AY-102 waste retrieval system.
The project will develop scope for interim actions required to stabilize the waste remaining in AY-102 following completion of the tank waste rinse, caustic

addition, and transfer of rinse liquid waste to AP-102. Low strength cementitious structural material (CLSM) fill that is routinely used in nuclear facilities to decrease personnel exposure to radiation and to address a range of chemical and radio-nuclide stabilization requirement, is being considered for waste stabilization in the tank. CLSM will be used as a temporary fill material that allows for excavation and removal at a later date. AX Farm Equipment Removal: Crews continued cleanout activities at AX-103 Pit B. Mobilization continued for cleanout activities at AX-101 pit D and for equipment removal of AX-104 riser 5A sluicer and AX-102 riser 1C pump. January 2018

SLIDE 4

4

Project Manager’s Assessment (cont.)

A-Farm Ventilation: Preparations began for placement of the A-Farm exhauster pad, including soliciting subcontractors to perform the work. The engineering design for A-Farm equipment removal and waste retrieval system installation was in progress. Fabrication of a proof-of-concept for duct isolation of A-Farm ventilation was completed. Retrieval Technology Development:

Volume Measure Tool - Five expressions of interest from potential vendors were received. Four of the five have potential to provide a laser in-tank volume

measurement system that should meet the critical requirements. Engineering began developing a Design Specification for development of a working measuring tool that can be used in 4” risers. It is planned that the specification and statement of work (SOW) will be completed and submitted to Procurement no later than March 5, 2018.

Rotary Core Drilling Technology - Procurement actions for a subcontract change to complete the remaining tasks were completed. The analyses required to core

drill one 6-foot diameter hole in an SST tank dome was completed. The development continued on the specification and SOW to design and build a tank dome coring system. The specification was completed on February 8, 2018, and the SOW was scheduled to complete by March 1, 2018.

Mechanical Waste Gathering Tools - WRPS engineering completed the final drafts of the SOW, specification and the mod traveler in mid-December 2017. The

Request for Proposal is now anticipated to be issued by March 12, 2018.

Develop a Hard Heel Sampling Tool(s) for A/AX Tanks - The SOW and specification for a vendor to modify existing tools (the “Auger” and “Clamshell”) was being

developed by engineering.

Mobile Gamma Scanner - Engineering identified a commercially available instrument that can withstand at or above 130o F. The vendor is still required to verify

the scanner functions within required parameters with 120 feet of cable attached prior to final procurement actions. Tank Farm Projects SX Interim Barrier Construction: The SX Farm evapotranspiration basin liner was completed in late December. The anchor trench was backfilled and compacted. Excavation for the drainage lines revealed numerous legacy utility lines which were being evaluated for removal or capping by WRPS Engineering. The storm water collection system distribution piping was installed in the basin. The excavation for the southeast and southwest stormwater collection vaults has been completed. Excavation began for the north stormwater vault. The Bay separator, a long lead procurement, was received and the subcontractor excavated the area for placement of the vertical catch basin which separates solids from water. Backfill of the basin continues, utilizing 36 inches of native sandy loam soil for filtration. The subcontractor is awaiting final engineering resolution for removal and/or rerouting of the legacy utility lines uncovered during drain pipe trench and storm water vault excavation. The bids were received for Phase II Interim Barrier Asphalt Cap for the north and south sections of the SX Farm and awarded in early February. Single Shell Tank Integrity Visual Inspections: The SST visual inspections were completed at tanks SX-103 and SX-113 in late December, and at U-103 in early

January. This brings the total of SST visual inspections to 9 out of the 12 scheduled for fiscal year 2018. It is anticipated the remaining three inspections will be

completed well ahead of the baseline schedule during January and February 2018. Results of any findings will be included in the report by farm at the conclusion of visual inspections this spring. DNFSB Recommendation 2012 - SS Flow Instrumentation: The electrical installation has been completed at all six pits to support the safety significant flow instrumentation in AW Farm. The subcontractor crew completed construction acceptance testing during early February. Following the CAT in AW Farm the mechanical installation of safety significant flow instrumentation will commence in AY/AZ Farms (early February). January 2018

SLIDE 5

5

Project Manager’s Assessment (cont.)

DST Transfer Pump Replacements: The Tank Farms field crew lifted the AW-103 pump partially out of the pit in order to perform an exploratory flush. The pump and column flushed cleanly with no apparent blockages evident. Laser scan measurements will be taken with the pump back in place to assure proper fit of the newly fabricated jumper. One of the previously purchased spare pumps in storage will be used as a replacement with the newly fabricated jumper. The SS transfer system components purchased during FY17 and FY18 will be utilized for completing the jumper fabrication and installation. Tank Farm Automation Upgrades Part II: The Tank Farm Automation subcontractor completed the fabrication of new freeze protection panels. The panels have been factory tested at the vendor and will be shipped in February. The new antennas were received from the fabricator and will replace the deficient ones in the field. 242-A Reboiler: Fabrication of the new spare re-boiler for the 242-A Evaporator continued with tube bundle assembly and completion of nozzle welds. Shell body fabrication continued at the vendor with completion of the fit/welding of vapor belt, impingement plate and circumference seams 1 and 2. Head Space & Stack Sampling: Farm setup of test jig was completed for BY Farm comparison head space sampling. Sampling will be used to validate the future use

f the cartridge sampling unit to carry out future head space samples. Validating the cartridge unit for future use will greatly facilitate future sampling, driving both

schedule and cost efficiencies. Comparison sampling in BY Farm will be executed in February, followed by a powered air purifying respirator cartridge test in BY Farm. Comprehensive Vapors Action Plan Workers who participated in field trials noted that the use of an air-line breathing system has many benefits, including increased mobility and lighter equipment to

load. The field evaluations found a few obstacles to the equipment such as managing the hose, the hose length limiting users in certain areas and possible safety

issues with hoses on the ground while multiple workers are moving throughout an area. Overall, the selective use (stationary activities within farms, wire terminations, select riser pit activities, etc.) of air-line breathing systems would be beneficial and improve overall task efficiencies. The AZ Farm Exhauster passed the declaration of readiness for both POR-126 and POR-127, and is now in full-time operation. Nucon Thermal Oxidation Vapor Abatement Unit: The development of the engineering-scale testing was on-going, to include preparing the technology maturation plan, transferring the Ultra-Violet Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and procuring documentation to repair and modify the unit to operate at 180ºC. Closure and Interim Measures The design of the SX Expansion Barrier was nearing completion. Review of the 90% design was completed. Ecology unofficially approved the design for construction, based on their review of the 60% and 90% design packages. Ecology approval will be documented through an agreement by Ecology and ORP Project Managers. Production Operations The stack monitors functional requirements document was completed and submitted for formal check and review. This will provide basis for vapors monitoring for discharges from DST farms. The Electronic Routing Board design was completed. The Electronic Routing Board is an electronic version of the paper routing board display in the Central Shift Office. The P&CS EV Team completed the replacement of a vacuum sample pump in AW primary B-Train Exhauster. January 2018

SLIDE 6

6

Project Manager’s Assessment (cont.)

Tank Farm Automation: MSA and Process and Control System Engineering (P&CS) Engineers replaced Meru wireless access point with a Prosoft access point at AN Farm and configured Prosoft radios in preparation for MSA upgrade activities, which are to be performed in the near future. This infrastructure change to support the Tank Farm Automation project has shown improved reliability and systems performance over the older access points. The order for equipment to replace the remaining farm access points was placed. Engineering Process and Control System (P&CS) engineers:

Supported FAT at the vendor’s facility for the six temperature monitoring/freeze protection panels to be installed at AW Farm. This was following a modification

to add local indicators to panels, and to ensure proper operation using Tank Farm Safety Programmable System development controller. Field installation is scheduled before

Identified functional requirements needed in order to provide electronic rounds/surveillance support for normal system monitoring tasks performed. The

proposed plan would be to utilize the electronic rounds application to document performed surveillances. One System & Chief Technology Office A deep dive review of the Tank Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) Demonstration Project was conducted with representatives from DOE-HQ and ORP senior management to discuss technical, permitting, and safety analysis requirements. The review resulted in a number of positive recommendations regarding permitting and safety documentation strategies. A Joint Management Review Session was also conducted to review the status and integration of the Low Activity Waste (LAW) Vitrification Facility Project and the WRPS TSCR, Tank Farm Upgrades, and LAWPS. Additional January 2018 Items of Note

Hanford contractor CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company announced an expanded work control zone around the Plutonium Finishing Plant due to specks of

low-level contamination being detected outside the original access control boundary. WRPS is currently evaluating the potential impacts of the expanded work control zone on scheduled WRPS activities and work.

WRPS Contracts submitted a change proposal to ORP for the Technology Demonstration of the TSCR. The TSCR system will be first of its kind on the Hanford site

for an at-tank cesium treatment of tank supernatant. The resulting treated tank waste will then be used as LAW feed to the Waste Treatment Plan in support of LAW Vitrification Facility hot commissioning and early operations. This proposal is the first of three integrated waste feed delivery change proposals directed by ORP due to the change in direction driven by the external review panel. January 2018

SLIDE 7

7

Safety Statistics

Through January 2018, WRPS Tank Operations Contract had worked 4,998,475 hours (358 days) without a Lost Time Workday Injury, and 1,104,044 hours (76 days) since the last Recordable case. There were no Recordable/Lost Time Workday cases in January.

Total Recordable FY 2018 Cumulative Summary

Integrated Safety Management System The Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 cumulative performance indicators for Recordable cases (0.11) and DART cases (0.00) surpassed the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management (DOE-EM) goals of 1.10 and 0.60, respectively. Additionally, the 12-month rolling average safety rates remained low, with a rate of 0.16 for Recordable cases and 0.04 for DART cases.

* Score Based on FY 2018 Cumulative Case Rate

* *

Days Away, Restricted Workdays or Transferred (DART) FY 2018 Cumulative Summary January 2018

SLIDE 8

8

Safety Statistics (cont.)

Total Recordable 12 Month Rolling Average Summary Days Away, Restricted Workdays or Transferred (DART) 12 Month Rolling Average Summary First Aid Case Rate - 12 Month Rolling Average Summary Eight First Aid cases in January:

While wearing SCBA employee felt tightness and pain in back.
Employee was getting out of truck, slipped on ice and fell causing abrasions

to right hand and finger.

While reading procedures employee received paper cut.
Employee was lifting bottles and felt pain in back.
While donning SCBA debris flew into employee’s eye causing irritation.
Employee moved tumbleweed away from vehicle, tripped over the parking

bumper and fell causing contusion to knee.

While donning SCBA employee experienced irritation to eye.
While wearing SCBA mask in the farm employee experienced irritation to

eyes.

January 2018

SLIDE 9

$261.6 $430.4 $471.0 $362.0 $366.6 $409.9 $523.7 $621.6 $634.9 $97.6 $60.6 $86.7 $612.0

$17.9 $28.0 $32.9 $23.5 $19.0 $21.6 $28.3 $38.0 $48.2 $54.4

$- $100.0 $200.0 $300.0 $400.0 $500.0 $600.0 $700.0 $800.0 $900.0 $1,000.0

$ Millions

FY 2009-2017 Actuals Carryover from FY 2017 LAWPS Carryover LAWPS Capital Projected FY 2018 Expense PMB Fee

Projected Expense PMB funding for FY 2018 is $612.0M. The projected funding for LAWPS in FY 2018 is $86.7M. The fee pool for FY 2018 is $54.4M. The FY 2017 Carryover is $97.6M. There is $60.6M in LAWPS Carryover, for a total of $914.2M

9

PMB Funds Analysis by Year

January 2018

SLIDE 10

10

FY 2017 Performance Based Incentive Profile

January 2018

Top 10 PBI Milestones by Value

All PBIs have Terminal Dates of 9/30/18.
All have positive calendar float
7 have a negative CSLM
PBIs 43.0 and 46.0 removed from these charts;

placed on hold with Con Mod 464 and expected to be removed/changed with Feb BCR #RPP-18-084.

PBI Milestone by Calendar Float

Three PBI Milestones have negative float, based on

calendar days.

Four PBIs reported negative, or zero float,

beginning this period

17 Milestones have between 0 and 10 days of float.

Baseline Change Requests

January 2018

BCR # BCR Title NCC AUW CBB DB UB PMB MR TAB $4,805,940 $243,827 $5,049,766 $4,775,205 $260,434 $5,035,638 $14,128 $5,049,766

Expense RPP-18-048 DOE 205.1B– Scoping Stage (Phase1) $100

$100

RPP-18-050 New AX Farm Road $611 $65 $675

$611

$65 RPP-18-051 Emergency Annulus Pumping Design & Fabrication

$1,398 $1,398

$1,334 $1,334 $1,334 RPP-18-052 222-S Lab Design and 2704 HV Installation

$1,847 $1,847

$1,041 $805 $1,847 $1,847 RPP-18-054 AW Stack Extension Field Work and incorporate Errata items

$5,655 $5,655

$2,152 $3,503 $5,655 $5,655 RPP-18-055 RTD Scope Deletions

$384

$384 RPP-18-056 AY-102 Continual Maintenance

$485 $485

$552

$67

$485 $485 RPP-18-057 Removal of D-00B-01 from Performance Measurement Baseline RPP-18-058 WTP Transition Support - Distribute Budget

$4,743 $4,743

$356 $4,387 $4,743 $4,743 LAWPS RPP-18-060 Consolidation of CP-17-008 and CP-17-031 with CP-18-007 Administrative RPP-18-059 Administrative Changes for - January FY18

Monthly BCR Impacts $0 $14,129 $14,129 $5,762 $8,977 $14,739.28

$611

$14,129 CBB/TAB Ending Point (In Thousands) $4,805,940 $257,955 $5,063,895 $4,780,967 $269,411 $5,050,377 $13,517 $5,063,895 CBB/TAB Starting Point (In Thousands)

SLIDE 21

21

Risk Management Assessment

Management of TOC risks continued in January 2018. TOC key risks cross cutting the various programs and projects are identified below along with their associated ongoing/planned handling actions, status of the handling actions, any emergent quality issues, staffing, alternative courses of action or other problems that may impact the baseline scope. During the month of January WRPS maintained 34+ active risk registers

SLIDE 30

30

Tank Farm Projects Safety

January 2018

12 month rolling wave

As of January 31, 2018 Tank Farm Projects has worked 1,430,728 hours or 1,407 days without a Lost Time Workday Injury, and has worked 615 days since a Recordable case. Work Related Injuries during January One first aid case:

61033: 200E/AX- TFP: TFP Field Crew, TFP Field Crew

Ops- While wearing SCBA employee felt tightness and pain in back. Employee was transported to HPMC and released with restrictions that do not impact normal job duties. 12 Month Rolling Wave

SLIDE 31

31

Tank Farm Projects Key Deliverables Status

January 2018

FY2018 Key Deliverables

Target Forecast 242-A Integrity Assessment- Leak Test and IQRPE Assessment Report for DOE-ORP (WAC 173-303 Recommendation) Report submitted SEP17 DEC17A Complete 90% design for AP-105 DFLAW upgrades On schedule for review mid-January DEC17 FEB18 Complete 242-A Process Condensate Station Work package planning complete; awaiting LOTO to begin field installation mid-January. DEC17 FEB18 Continuous Air Monitor Upgrades - Issue Report Incorporating comments from first WRPS review FEB18 FEB18 AP801 Water Service Upgrade - Complete field installation of new equipment Existing equipment removed; final mechanical measurements taken for fabrications FEB18 FEB18 Complete twelve SST Integrity visual inspections SX and TX Farm visual inspections completed to date. December January FEB18 FEB18 Complete field work supporting ETF Integrity Assessment Schedule field testing per facility availability MAR18 MAR18 DST Improvement Plan - Procure robotic crawlers (2) Received from Adaptive Energy December; Kurion completed fabrication; testing during February FEB18 FEB18 242-A Reboiler - complete fabrication and deliver Fabrication ongoing; IQRPE witnessed welding girth seams MAR18 APR18 Complete field work supporting 219-S Integrity Assessment Work package planning for leak testing MAY18 MAY18 Simulant Valve Testing - completion of 1,500 cycle & Leak Testing all valves McCanna valves testing complete; revise valve assembly procedure/obtain vendor approval MAY18 JUN18 Complete permanent power installation to 6241-V in support of Crossite Transfer line Reactivation Temporary power ECN completed, breakers and generator received JUN18 JUN18 Complete nine DST Annulus visual inspections Work package planning completed AW Farm; ready to commence after completion of SST videos. JUN18 JUN18 Perform NACE and/or encasement pressure checks at three pits. Testing valve on Supernate Transfer Line - SNL-5350 before Encasement pressure check round 2 JUL18 AUG18 Leak Detector Relay Replacement Installation complete Developing design media for wireless transmitter installation ECN AUG18 AUG18

SLIDE 32

32

Tank Farm Projects DNFSB/TPA/Consent Decree Milestones

January 2018 ORP Letter (E-stars 2017-1291) to Chairman Sullivan requests change of Action 3-1 milestone to 30-Sep-18. WRPS Baseline Change Request approved for next reporting period.

SLIDE 33

33

Tank Farm Projects FY18 PBI Milestones

January 2018

PBI #

PBI Title Terminal Dates Analyst POC % of Fee Total Available Fee B a s e l Fieldwork Completion 02/05/18 TFP Field Float (to 8/31/18) Change 1 wk (FES) PBI Completion 02/12/18 Total Float per Terminal Date % Probability

f

completion by 09/30/18

PBI-37.0.2.1

Complete Grab Sample #1 in support of Tank Operations Contract (TOC) mission - AP-107 large sample 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Stoner, Ryan 1.1% $75,000 23-Oct-17A 213 1 31-Oct-17A 228 100%

PBI-37.0.2.2

Complete Grab Sample #2 in support of Tank Operations Contract (TOC) mission - AP-107 chemistry grab 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Stoner, Ryan 1.1% $75,000 13-Nov-17 A 208 30-Nov-17 A 208 100%

PBI-37.0.2.3

Complete Grab Sample #3 in support of Tank Operations Contract (TOC) mission 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Stoner, Ryan 1.1% $75,000 29-Nov-17A 152 20-Dec-17A 190 100%

PBI-37.0.2.4

Complete Grab Sample #4 in support of Tank Operations Contract (TOC) mission 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Stoner, Ryan 1.1% $75,000 16-Dec-17a 178 20-Dec-17A 178 100%

PBI-37.0.2.5

Complete Grab Sample #5 in support of Tank Operations Contract (TOC) mission 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Stoner, Ryan 1.1% $75,000 23-Mar-18 113 2-Apr-18 125 80%

PBI-37.0.2.6

Complete Grab Sample #6 in support of Tank Operations Contract (TOC) mission 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Stoner, Ryan 1.1% $75,000 30-Mar-18 108 9-Apr-18 120 80%

PBI-37.0.2.7

Complete Grab Sample #7 in support of Tank Operations Contract (TOC) mission 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Stoner, Ryan 1.1% $75,000 11-May-18 78 21-May-18 90 80%

PBI-37.0.2.8

Complete Grab Sample #8 in support of Tank Operations Contract (TOC) mission 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Stoner, Ryan 1.1% $75,000 25-Jun-18 48 3-Jul-18 60 80%

PBI-37.0.4

Complete robot crawler demonstration through field deployment in one DST 30-Sep-18 Spinato,Nick Castleberry, Jim 1.5% $100,000 23-Jul-18 23 12 30-Jul-18 34 80%

PBI-37.0.5.1

Perform Ultrasonic testing examination of DST AY-101 30-Sep-18 Spinato,Nick Castleberry, Jim 1.5% $100,000 30-Apr-18 69 8 8-May-18 79 80%

PBI-37.0.5.2

Perform Ultrasonic testing examination of DST AZ-101 30-Sep-18 Spinato,Nick Castleberry, Jim 1.5% $100,000 18-Jul-18 25 12 26-Jul-18 35 80%

PBI-37.0.5.3

Perform Ultrasonic testing examination of DST AP-107 30-Sep-18 Spinato,Nick Castleberry, Jim 1.5% $100,000 11-Sep-18

5

14 19-Sep-18 5 80%

PBI-37.0.6

Complete design, fabrication, and testing of an annulus pumping system capable of deployment in anyone of the 27 double-shell tanks 30-Sep-18 Powers, Katie May, Dustin 4.5% $300,000 20-Aug-18 7 28-Aug-18 17 80%

PBI-38.0.1.1

Complete HVAC Control room upgrade (Complete the removal and replacement of the 242‑A Evaporator Control Room HVAC system) 30-Sep-18 Wright, Bryan Stoner, Tyler 4.2% $275,000 5-Mar-18 101

6

12-Mar-18 112 80%

PBI-38.0.1.2

Complete 242-A Evaporator Fire alarm panel upgrade 30-Sep-18 Powers, Katie Stoner, Tyler 4.2% $275,000 19-Jun-18 52 26-Jun-18 52 80%

PBI-38.0.4.1

Complete installation of in-pit heaters in ten (10) pits 30-Sep-18 Powers, Katie Nelson, Bobby 4.4% $292,000 20-Aug-18

25
5

23-Aug-18 18 80%

PBI-38.0.4.2

Complete AZ-102 pump replacement 30-Sep-18 Spinato,Nick May, Dustin 4.4% $292,000 23-May-18 100

2

27-May-18 126 80%

PBI-38.0.4.3

Complete AW-103 pump replacement 30-Sep-18 Spinato,Nick May, Dustin 4.4% $292,000 25-Sep-18

25
12

29-Sep-18 1 80%

PBI-38.0.4.4

Complete wireless instrumentation installation in nine (9) pits 30-Sep-18 Powers, Katie Larsen, Doug 4.4% $292,000 1-Aug-18 26

4

13-Aug-18 26 80%

PBI-38.0.4.5

Complete electrical upgrades to AW-103 and AW-104 to support 242-A Evaporator campaigns and transfers from 241-AW-3 and 241-AW-4 30-Sep-18 Earhart, Amy Stoner, Tyler 4.4% $292,000 2-Jul-18 34

11

10-Jul-18 45 80%

PBI-38.0.4.6

Complete electrical installation to one permanent safety shower and electrical racks to three existing showers. 30-Sep-18 Powers, Katie Jansen, Jeff 4.4% $292,000 1-May-18 68

2

9-May-18 78 80%

PBI-38.0.5

Complete one (1) basin cover replacement at ETF 30-Sep-18 Wright, Bryan Stoner, Ryan 12.9% $850,000 27-Jun-18 36 5-Jul-18 47 80%

PBI-38.0.6.1

Complete AW Farm safety significant (SS) flow upgrades 30-Sep-18 Powers, Katie Larsen, Doug 4.9% $325,000 5-Feb-18A NA 22-Feb-18 121 90%

PBI-38.0.6.2

Complete AZ Farm safety significant (SS) flow upgrades 30-Sep-18 Powers, Katie Larsen, Doug 4.9% $325,000 2-Apr-18 79

2

9-Apr-18 96 80%

PBI-41.0.2

In support of completion of TPA M-045-92, Complete Evapotranspiration Basin at SX Farm 30-Sep-18 Powers, Katie Jansen, Jeff 7.6% $500,000 29-Mar-18 86 1 5-Apr-18 97 80%

PBI-41.0.3

In support of completion of TPA M-045-92, Complete North Barrier as designed at SX Farm 30-Sep-18 Powers, Katie Jansen, Jeff 7.6% $500,000 18-Sep-18

9
44

25-Sep-18 2 80%

PBI-41.0.4

In support of completion of TPA M-045-92, Complete South Barrier as designed at SX Farm 30-Sep-18 Powers, Katie Jansen, Jeff 7.6% $500,000 5-Jul-18 32 17 12-Jul-18 43 80% $6,602,000

SLIDE 34

34

Tank Farm Projects Performance CM and FYTD

January 2018

WBS BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV SPI CPI BAC FCST P FY Spend FCSTSV FCSTCV TCPI FCST P 5.01.01.03.08 - Core & Grab Sampling incl. ORSS & Equip

2
2
38

54 38

16
0.71
341

378 341

36

0.94 5.01.01.03.09 - Tank Waste Sampling Program FY18 176 176 192

17

805 805 775

30

1.00 1.04 2,725 2,725 2,573

152 1.07 5.01.01.03.10 - Grab Sampling 9 9 36

27

219 624 601 404 22 2.84 1.04 1,680 1,680 1,889

209

0.82 5.01.01.05.11 - 242-A Integrity Assessment 6

24
6
24

103 146 219 43

73

1.42 0.67 103 172 276 69

104

0.45 5.01.01.05.16 - Waste Transf Sys FFU Encasemnt Testing (FY16)

89

32 89 57

2.76
89

32 89 57

5.01.01.05.20 - DST Integrity Improvement Plan

5 313 307 308 6 96 551 493 455 58 5.77 1.12 1,383 1,773 1,743 389 30 0.98 5.01.01.05.23 - CHEM-D-42 Leak Assessment 17 10 23

8
14

77 114 114 37

1.47 1.00 238 297 302 59

5

0.98 5.01.01.05.26 - Tank Integrity Chemistry & Corrosion (FY17&18) 23 23

23

105 105 3

102

1.00 30.50 357 357 255 101 1.00 5.01.01.05.27 - DST Integrity Ultrasonic Testing FY17

97

176 97

79
498

724 498

225
0.69
1,689

1,481 1,689 208 1.57 5.01.01.05.28 - SST Integrity Visual Inspection

15

7 15 8 167 324 463 157

139

1.94 0.70 167 362 469 195

108

5.61 5.01.01.05.29 - Waste Transf Sys FFU Encasement Testing FY17

12

17 12

5
115

214 115

99
0.54
128

209 128

81

(2.80) 5.01.01.05.30 - DST Enhanced Annulus Visual Inspection FY17

1

7 1

6
22

50 22

29
0.43
26

57 26

31

0.60 5.01.01.05.31 - Tank Chemistry Control FY17

49

32 49 18

251

219 251 32

1.14
406

349 406 57 1.19 5.01.01.05.33 - FFS-Simulant Valve Testing 69 14 85

56
72

373 64 286

309
223

0.17 0.22 708 606 1,038

102
432

0.72 5.01.01.05.35 - SST Integrity Assessment 73 21 59

52
38

269 284 157 14 126 1.05 1.80 991 989 806

2

183 1.09 5.01.01.05.36 - DST Structural AOR to Support Tank Lvl Increase

56

104 56

48

411 255 321

156
66

0.62 0.79 411 812 965 401

153

0.87 5.01.01.05.38 - Integrity Project Mgt & Oversight FY18 171 171 105

66

781 781 443

338

1.00 1.76 2,643 2,643 1,975 669 1.22 5.01.01.05.40 - DST Integrity Ultrasonic Testing FY18 10

31
10
31

47 18 52

29
34

0.38 0.35 1,401 1,380 1,490

21
111

0.95 5.01.01.05.41 - SST Integrity Visual Inspection FY18

159

180 159

21
749

500 749 248

1.50

1,601 1,601 1,362 239 0.99 5.01.01.05.42 - Waste Transf Sys FFU Encasemnt Testing FY18

18

81 18

64
106

154 106

48
0.69

429 429 524

95

0.87 5.01.01.05.43 - DST Enhanced Annulus Visual Inspection FY18 164 40 35

123

5 215 75 51

140

24 0.35 1.47 809 809 634 175 1.26 5.01.01.05.44 - Tank Chemistry Control FY18 69 31 81

39
50

239 115 117

124
2

0.48 0.98 2,516 2,465 2,340

51

125 1.06 5.01.01.05.45 - ETF Integrity Assessment 25 8 36

17
28

280 221 163

59

58 0.79 1.36 497 732 497 235 235 1.53 5.01.01.05.47 - 219-S Integrity Assessment 100 9 39

91
31

305 48 96

257
48

0.16 0.50 1,562 1,562 1,073

489 1.55 5.01.02.06.13 - Replace ETF Basin Covers 148 1 2

147
1

148 15 79

133
64

0.10 0.19 3,591 3,605 4,758 14

1,153

0.77 5.01.04.01.16 - TF Automation Upgrades (DNFSB Action 3-1)

37
37
8

140 8

133
0.06
72

392 72

320

0.26 5.01.04.01.18 - DST In-Pit Heating 168 51 82

117
31

254 239 367

15
127

0.94 0.65 1,840 2,656 2,572 816 84 1.10 5.01.04.01.20 - LOW Van Software/Hardware upgrades

24

4 24 20

39

53 39

14
0.73
39

53 39

14
5.01.04.01.22 - Replacement of AW-106 Pump and Jumpers
10
1

10 12

(8.29)
10
1

10 12

5.01.04.01.30 - Cross-Site Transfer Line Activation

43 37 60

7
23

160 104 177

56
73

0.65 0.59 376 408 531 32

123

0.86 5.01.04.01.44 - AP-801 Water Service Upgrade 188 66 134

121
68

591 480 538

111
58

0.81 0.89 739 860 750 122 111 1.80 5.01.04.01.48 - DNFSB Recommendation 2012-2 Act 2-2 thru 2-4 311 741 545 430 196 1,597 1,451 1,431

147

20 0.91 1.01 4,155 4,311 4,407 156

96

0.96 5.01.04.01.50 - 242-A Process Condensate Sampling Station

206

136 206 71

229

182 229 46

1.25
384

380 384 4 0.79 5.01.04.01.51 - Tank Farm Projects Prog Oversight - Opt P2 910 910 886

24

4,168 4,168 4,088

80

1.00 1.02 14,103 14,103 12,800

1,303 1.14 5.01.04.01.54 - Continuous Air Monitor Upgrades Evaluation 11 76 4 64 72 130 209 40 79 169 1.61 5.22 130 233 83 103 150 0.55 5.01.04.01.60 - SY Exhauster Upgrades

1,032
143

1,032

143
1,032
143

1,032

143
5.01.04.01.64 - DST Transfer Pump Replacements (FY17&18)

108 369 433 261

64

460 962 930 502 33 2.09 1.04 6,099 7,253 6,441 1,154 812 1.14 5.01.04.01.69 - Leak Detector Relay Replacement 70 80 16 10 64 393 224 238

169
14

0.57 0.94 1,122 1,227 1,073 105 155 1.20 5.01.04.01.77 - TF Automation Upgrades (FY17&18) 62 158 97 96 61 294 493 373 199 120 1.68 1.32 2,773 3,077 3,077 303

1

0.96 5.01.04.01.79 - AW-103 and AW-104 Electrical Upgrades 61 20 12

41

8 188 113 35

75

78 0.60 3.26 516 626 743 109

118

0.72 5.01.04.01.80 - DNFSB-2012-2 Streamlined Approach to SS Vent. 92

92
92
92
667

667 623 44 1.07 5.01.04.01.81 - AP-106 Transfer Pump Replacement

25

2 25 23 79 1,055 799 977 256 13.41 1.32 79 1,076 803 998 274 6.26 5.01.04.01.85 - 242-A Spare Reboiler

2

20 2

18
16

61 16

45
0.27
515

667 515

152

0.82 5.01.04.01.87 - DST TAPD and ISP Revision (FY17 & 18) 58 1

58
1

119 1

118

0.00 1.23 392 392 324 68 1.21 5.01.04.01.88 - Safety Shower Upgrades 25 32 174 7

142

344 89 264

255
175

0.26 0.34 787 759 837

27
78

1.17 5.01.04.01.89 - Critical Transfer System Components

11

54 11

44
55

546 55

491
0.10
107

693 107

585

0.36 5.01.04.01.90 - 241-BY Farm Encapsulate Asbestos Insulation

2
17

2 19

(0.12)
2
17

2 19

5.01.04.01.91 - 242-A Evaporator Fire Alarm Panel Upgrades
6

20 6

14
9

44 9

35
0.20
781

795 781

14

1.03 5.01.04.01.92 - 242-A Control Room HVAC Upgrade 21 13 25

8
12

214 383 345 169 38 1.79 1.11 214 443 395 229 48 1.20 5.01.04.01.93 - Annulus Emergency Pumping Capability 55 205 123 150 82 180 356 308 176 48 1.97 1.15 1,603 1,637 1,540 34 97 1.04 5.01.04.01.94 - Fire Alarm System Upgrades - 2704HV & 222-S Lab 19 12 34

7
22

399 52 105

347
53

0.13 0.50 399 427 404 28 23 1.25 5.01.04.01.97 - 222-S Lab Fire Alarm System Upgrades

1,041

1,041 1,050

9

0.99 5.01.05.01.13 - Construction & Commissioning Mgmt - Opt P2 200 200 158

42

914 914 891

24

1.00 1.03 3,094 3,094 2,570

524 1.30 5.02.01.04.11 - Interim SX Barrier - Construction 177 96 554

81
459

805 877 2,345 72

1,468

1.09 0.37 5,526 5,889 9,485 363

3,596

0.70 5.02.01.04.12 - Interim SX Barrier - North Construction

13
13
2

26 2

24
0.08

4,459 4,459 5,501

1,043

0.81 5.03.02.06.08 - Project Management Upgrades support DFLAW 86 36 33

50

4 441 382 38

59

344 0.87 10.06 1,379 1,564 995 185 568 1.23 5.03.02.06.09 - AP-107 Tank Farm Upgrades to Support DFLAW 196 310 272 115 38 1,277 1,671 1,375 394 296 1.31 1.22 3,089 3,733 3,486 644 247 0.98 5.03.02.06.10 - AP-105 Tank Farm Upgrades to Support DFLAW

232

235 232

3

351 992 1,260 641

268

2.82 0.79 7,439 7,743 7,509 304 234 1.08 5.03.02.06.16 - Tank Farm Upgrade Project for WFD Support 53

10
53
10

53

10
53
10
424

424 421

2 1.03 5.03.02.06.17 - Tank-Side Cesium Removal Upgrades

3,601

3,601 3,594 7 1.00 Total 3,980 5,149 5,832 1,169

683

17,116 21,997 23,527 4,881

1,530

1.29 0.93 88,824 101,290 102,606 12,466

1,316

1.00 Current Month FYTD FY End

SLIDE 35

35

Tank Farm Projects Current Month Variances

January 2018

SLIDE 36

36

Tank Farm Projects Performance Cumulative to Date

January 2018

WBS BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV SPI CPI BAC TCPI 5.01.01.03.08 - Core & Grab Sampling incl. ORSS & Equip 1,866 1,563 1,684

303
121

0.84 0.93 1,866 0.94 5.01.01.03.09 - Tank Waste Sampling Program FY18 805 805 775

30

1.00 1.04 2,725 1.07 5.01.01.03.10 - Grab Sampling 219 624 601 404 22 2.84 1.04 1,680 0.82 5.01.01.05.11 - 242-A Integrity Assessment 1,765 1,740 1,865

26
125

0.99 0.93 1,765 0.45 5.01.01.05.16 - Waste Transf Sys FFU Encasemnt Testing (FY16) 1,128 1,128 725

403

1.00 1.56 1,128

5.01.01.05.20 - DST Integrity Improvement Plan

1,463 777 971

686
194

0.53 0.80 2,751 0.95 5.01.01.05.23 - CHEM-D-42 Leak Assessment 309 287 430

22
144

0.93 0.67 470 0.98 5.01.01.05.26 - Tank Integrity Chemistry & Corrosion (FY17&18) 327 327 91

236

1.00 3.60 578 1.00 5.01.01.05.27 - DST Integrity Ultrasonic Testing FY17 3,651 2,461 3,121

1,191
661

0.67 0.79 3,651 1.57 5.01.01.05.28 - SST Integrity Visual Inspection 1,475 1,438 2,033

37
595

0.97 0.71 1,475 5.61 5.01.01.05.29 - Waste Transf Sys FFU Encasement Testing FY17 289 275 302

14
27

0.95 0.91 289 (2.80) 5.01.01.05.30 - DST Enhanced Annulus Visual Inspection FY17 959 955 612

4

343 1.00 1.56 959 0.60 5.01.01.05.31 - Tank Chemistry Control FY17 2,190 2,035 2,181

155
146

0.93 0.93 2,190 1.19 5.01.01.05.33 - FFS-Simulant Valve Testing 1,166 767 1,149

399
382

0.66 0.67 1,500 0.86 5.01.01.05.35 - SST Integrity Assessment 319 336 323 17 13 1.05 1.04 1,041 1.09 5.01.01.05.36 - DST Structural AOR to Support Tank Lvl Increase 1,429 872 895

557
24

0.61 0.97 1,429 0.87 5.01.01.05.38 - Integrity Project Mgt & Oversight FY18 781 781 443

338

1.00 1.76 2,643 1.22 5.01.01.05.40 - DST Integrity Ultrasonic Testing FY18 47 18 52

29
34

0.38 0.35 1,401 0.95 5.01.01.05.41 - SST Integrity Visual Inspection FY18

749

500 749 248

1.50

1,601 0.99 5.01.01.05.42 - Waste Transf Sys FFU Encasemnt Testing FY18

106

154 106

48
0.69

429 0.87 5.01.01.05.43 - DST Enhanced Annulus Visual Inspection FY18 215 75 51

140

24 0.35 1.47 809 1.26 5.01.01.05.44 - Tank Chemistry Control FY18 239 115 117

124
2

0.48 0.98 2,516 1.06 5.01.01.05.45 - ETF Integrity Assessment 1,630 1,336 867

294

469 0.82 1.54 1,846 1.53 5.01.01.05.47 - 219-S Integrity Assessment 305 48 96

257
48

0.16 0.50 1,562 1.55 5.01.02.06.13 - Replace ETF Basin Covers 3,789 3,642 5,958

147
2,316

0.96 0.61 7,232 0.77 5.01.04.01.16 - TF Automation Upgrades (DNFSB Action 3-1) 8,557 8,493 10,060

64
1,567

0.99 0.84 8,557 0.26 5.01.04.01.18 - DST In-Pit Heating 3,628 2,796 4,579

831
1,783

0.77 0.61 5,213 1.10 5.01.04.01.20 - LOW Van Software/Hardware upgrades 1,327 1,327 1,697

370

1.00 0.78 1,327

5.01.04.01.22 - Replacement of AW-106 Pump and Jumpers

5,186 5,186 5,831

645

1.00 0.89 5,186

5.01.04.01.30 - Cross-Site Transfer Line Activation

238 150 218

88
68

0.63 0.69 454 0.86 5.01.04.01.44 - AP-801 Water Service Upgrade 1,051 818 818

233

1 0.78 1.00 1,199 1.80 5.01.04.01.48 - DNFSB Recommendation 2012-2 Act 2-2 thru 2-4 10,974 10,671 9,060

303

1,611 0.97 1.18 13,532 0.96 5.01.04.01.50 - 242-A Process Condensate Sampling Station 1,073 917 762

156

156 0.85 1.20 1,073 0.79 5.01.04.01.51 - Tank Farm Projects Prog Oversight - Opt P2 18,364 18,364 17,077

1,286

1.00 1.08 28,298 1.14 5.01.04.01.54 - Continuous Air Monitor Upgrades Evaluation 239 215 52

24

163 0.90 4.16 239 0.55 5.01.04.01.60 - SY Exhauster Upgrades 975 975 1,746

770

1.00 0.56 975

5.01.04.01.64 - DST Transfer Pump Replacements (FY17&18)

2,497 1,845 1,919

652
74

0.74 0.96 8,136 1.14 5.01.04.01.69 - Leak Detector Relay Replacement 732 458 772

273
314

0.63 0.59 1,461 1.20 5.01.04.01.77 - TF Automation Upgrades (FY17&18) 1,603 1,499 872

104

626 0.93 1.72 4,082 0.96 5.01.04.01.79 - AW-103 and AW-104 Electrical Upgrades 329 145 57

185

87 0.44 2.53 658 0.72 5.01.04.01.80 - DNFSB-2012-2 Streamlined Approach to SS Vent. 117 25 5

92

20 0.21 4.70 692 1.07 5.01.04.01.81 - AP-106 Transfer Pump Replacement 3,569 3,548 4,524

21
976

0.99 0.78 3,569 6.27 5.01.04.01.85 - 242-A Spare Reboiler 982 483 364

499

119 0.49 1.33 982 0.82 5.01.04.01.87 - DST TAPD and ISP Revision (FY17 & 18) 506 387 273

118

114 0.77 1.42 778 1.21 5.01.04.01.88 - Safety Shower Upgrades 1,360 1,133 1,403

228
270

0.83 0.81 1,803 1.17 5.01.04.01.89 - Critical Transfer System Components 284 232 901

52
669

0.82 0.26 284 0.36 5.01.04.01.90 - 241-BY Farm Encapsulate Asbestos Insulation 383 383 243

140

1.00 1.58 383

5.01.04.01.91 - 242-A Evaporator Fire Alarm Panel Upgrades

811 39 88

772
49

0.05 0.44 811 1.03 5.01.04.01.92 - 242-A Control Room HVAC Upgrade 660 600 597

60

2 0.91 1.00 660 1.20 5.01.04.01.93 - Annulus Emergency Pumping Capability 250 392 359 141 33 1.57 1.09 1,673 1.04 5.01.04.01.94 - Fire Alarm System Upgrades - 2704HV & 222-S Lab 456 80 112

375
32

0.18 0.72 456 1.25 5.01.04.01.97 - 222-S Lab Fire Alarm System Upgrades

1,041

0.99 5.01.05.01.13 - Construction & Commissioning Mgmt - Opt P2 4,020 4,020 3,444

576

1.00 1.17 6,200 1.30 5.02.01.04.11 - Interim SX Barrier - Construction 1,465 1,174 2,511

291
1,337

0.80 0.47 6,186 0.70 5.02.01.04.12 - Interim SX Barrier - North Construction

2

26 2

24
0.08

4,459 0.81 5.03.02.06.08 - Project Management Upgrades support DFLAW 630 387 42

243

345 0.61 9.24 1,568 1.23 5.03.02.06.09 - AP-107 Tank Farm Upgrades to Support DFLAW 4,724 4,474 4,722

250
248

0.95 0.95 6,536 0.98 5.03.02.06.10 - AP-105 Tank Farm Upgrades to Support DFLAW 2,446 2,783 2,791 337

8

1.14 1.00 9,533 1.08 5.03.02.06.16 - Tank Farm Upgrade Project for WFD Support 53

10
53
10
424

1.03 5.03.02.06.17 - Tank-Side Cesium Removal Upgrades

3,601

1.00 Total 447,582 438,983 444,979

8,600
5,996

0.98 0.99 519,290 1.00

SLIDE 37

37

Tank Farm Projects CTD Schedule Variances

January 2018

CTD SV January 2018 (-$8,600k)

5.1.1.3.8 Core & Grab Sampling (-$303k) Cause: Delay in obtaining the AY-102 grab sample (-$147k) and a delay in the procurement of sampling equipment (-$157k).The AY-102 sample is dependent upon a determination on SCBA or APR requirements to perform the work. Also higher priority sampling in support of C-105 retrieval in September contributed to the delay. The purchase of sampling equipment in September has been delayed due to engineering evaluation of functions and requirements for the equipment, as well as, examining currently available equipment for ease in procurement. Impact: This variance does not impact any other control accounts. Sampling schedule variance will continue until higher priority sampling has been completed and a determination on SCBA or APR requirements has been made. Equipment schedule variance will continue through second quarter of FY18 due to engineering evaluation and long lead time for procurement, however the project has sufficient equipment to execute current scope of work. Corrective Action: The schedule variance for AY-102 sample will be recovered in the coming months once higher priority sampling has been completed and a determination on SCBA or APR requirements has been made (Projected March). The sampling equipment variance will be recovered once equipment has been ordered and received (Projected March). 5.1.1.5.20 DST Integrity Improvement Plan (-$686k) Cause: 1) Delay in delivery, on site testing and training for the Robotic Crawler designed and fabricated by Kurion. 2) The contract for Flash Thermography contract was not placed. A feasibility study was done to ensure the final product could be utilized to meet the scopes intent. It was determined that the Flash Thermography technology could not properly be deployed in the field so pursuing a contract was no longer viable. With the scopes intent not able to be met and the project on hold. The Preliminary & Final Design, as well as Fabrication, Test & Delivery activities are now behind schedule. Flash thermography scope will no longer be performed and has been logged to go off contract. 3) Delay experienced awaiting the specification document from PNNL which delays procurement. Impact: 1) Robotic crawler deliver scheduled late February 2018; full recovery with performance demonstration July/August 2018. 2) Flash Thermography scope will be deleted in future BCR.3) Guided Wave field deployment and final report are projected as carryover for FY19. Corrective Action: 1) No corrective action. 2) Flash thermography scope balance has been logged as part of the scopes to go off contract. Upon receipt of formal deletion modification the baseline will be updated to reflect removal. 3) The Guided Wave deployment and final report have been logged for deferral to FY19. 5.1.1.5.27 DST Ultrasonic Testing FY17 (-$1,191k) Cause: Delayed start of Ultrasonic Testing (UT) at AZ-101, AY-101, and the SY Farm floor scans. The delay was originally caused by the lack of necessary support labor resources required to perform the UT Scans at AN-106. These labor resources were performing UT scans in the 242 Evaporator Room under WBS 5.1.1.5.11. After the AN-106 UT field work kicked off in December, additional delays were incurred due to poor weather conditions. The Hanford site was closed, delayed or released early a number of times in December & January. These weather related delays caused the unfavorable schedule variance to grow and subsequently delay the start of UT scans at AZ-101. UT field work at AZ-101 was again delayed due to the PUREX tunnel collapse that occurred on May 9th, 2017. Three working days were lost as crews weren’t allowed into the farm (May 9th-11th). On May 12th, the UT crew was allowed back into the farm to retrieve the two crawlers that had been left on the Double Shell Tank (DST) annulus wall since the take cover was initiated on May 9th. The extended period of time each crawler spent on the annulus wall, caused them to receive high doses of radiation. This caused some electrical components to fail and require 2 additional working days to repair (May 15th-16th). On May 18th, UT field work at AZ-101 was shut down due to the unexpected discovery of contamination in the tank annulus. This discovery resulted in a stop work at AZ- 101 as an event investigation was implemented to review what took place and develop any necessary corrective actions. During FY18 additional delays due to farm ventilation issues and SCBA mask issues, have continued to impede performance although AY-101 UT is currently underway. Impact: The delayed start, inclement weather, PUREX tunnel collapse, and contamination event have impacted the schedule to perform Ultrasonic Testing (UT) on six Double Shell Tanks (DST) in

FY17. The field work for AN-106 finished in March but had already slipped 47 days. The three SY floor scans finished 34 days behind schedule and the field work at AZ-101 & AY-101 is now being

performed during FY18 as carryover. The UT scope at AY-01 is forecast to complete in April 2018 and AZ-101 July 2018. Corrective Action: Continue to work with the Work Area Manager and Production Controls to ensure the necessary resources are available to complete the UT field work at AY-101 and AY-101. 5.1.1.5.33 Simulant Valve Testing (-$399k) Cause: Delays in testing the PBM metal seated valves and Flowserve Mach 1 valves ($98.1k). During assembly of the Flowserve Mach-1 valves, it was discovered that soft-component seals for the test valves were incompatible. In result, testing was delayed while WRPS and PNNL worked to identify the cause and appropriate replacement seals. During reassembly of the PBM metal seated valves, it was discovered that the vendor procedure did not adequately address reassembly of the valves in a configuration that is leak tight. To resolve the issue, WRPS and PNNL revised the vendor procedure to support a leak tight configuration and submitted to the vendor for concurrence. As a result testing was delayed while WRPS and PNNL worked to identify the correct configuration and revise the vendor procedure for reassembly. The delays in testing of the Flowserve Mach-1 and PBM metal seated valves have also delayed teardown, ($50.5k), and completion of the final test report, ($249.3k). Impact: The issues associated with the Flowserve Mach-1 and PBM metal seated valves have delayed the start of testing so that it is no longer being performed in parallel with the McCanna valves. This has also delayed completion of the contract to November FY19. Corrective Action: 1) Revise the vendor procedure to adequately address reassembly of the valves in a configuration that is leak tight (February2018). 2) Have vendor obtain new Tefzel seals that will be compatible with the valves for testing. The valves are expected to be delivered to PNNL no later than 2/5/18.

SLIDE 38

38

Tank Farm Projects CTD Schedule Variances

January 2018

CTD SV January 2018 (-$8,600k)

5.1.1.5.36 DST Structural AOR to Support Tank Level Rise (-$557k) Cause: 1) Delayed contract award and start, 2) resource availability issues, and 3) additional seismic modeling requirements being identified. 1) This scope is primarily based on a large contract with Pacific Northwest National Laboratories (PNNL). The placing of this contract was delayed as engineering resources weren't available to develop and review a technically accurate statement of work. This resulted in a two month delay in PNNL starting their support. 2) PNNL experienced resource availability issues related to a delay in placing their subcontract with Becht Nuclear Services to support performance of the Seismic modeling. The contract was delayed as Becht was no longer on PNNL's Evaluated Suppliers List (ESL) and needed to have their Quality Assurance (QA) program reevaluated. WRPS also experienced delays in having the Evaluation Criteria Document reviewed. The contracted expert reviewer was out of the country and unavailable. These resource related delays resulted in an additional two month slip. 3) Recommendations from the expert reviewer led to an additional seismic modeling approach being implemented into the overall Analysis of Record. This has delayed the completion of a final seismic modeling approach and resulted in an additional four month schedule slip .Impact: Overall, the project is projecting to finish 9 months behind schedule (September 2018). Corrective Action: No corrective actions have been identified at this time. The project is planning to finish nine months behind schedule (September 2018). 5.1.4.1.18 DST In-Pit Heating (-$831k) Cause: Field work activities have been delayed by the completion in final design. The delay resulted from reworking the installation design needed due to change in requirement to burying the conduit instead of running flex conduit under yellow jacket covering from the mini power zone to the cover block. Procurement of heaters needed for FY18 field installation have been delayed by 5 months due to the procurement resources working on higher company priority procurements. Originally the materials were planned to be delivered in August, the current delivery date is February 2018. Impact: Projects affected if DST In-Pit Heating is not completed are as follows: TF Automation Part 2 due to the need for the project to install the AN01A and AN06A temperature monitoring trees and update associated design media to account for the utilization of the upgrades trees from both projects and vapor controls by limiting the use of operators and redeploying these resources to other projects would not occur (projects such as DST transfers). Corrective Action: Project has worked with procurement to insure the material request is awarded and heater delivery is scheduled the second quarter of FY2018. 5.1.4.1.48 DNFSB Recommendation 2012 2-2 thru 2-4 (-$303k) Cause: Delay in completion of construction acceptance testing (CAT) in AW farm as well as the AY/AZ design work. The CAT was originally planned for completion during fiscal January 2018, however, a companywide mask stop work delayed the completion of the installation until the end of the fiscal month January 2018 which pushed the CAT testing out into fiscal month February 2018 Impact: The total of float for DNSFB 2012-2 Action 2-3 the total float 1 day. The total of float for DNSFB 2012-2 Action 2-2 gained by 11 days making the total float 11 days as a result of the AW Farm performance recovery during the period. Corrective Action: The project is planning to overtime to complete the CAT. 5.1.4.1.64 DST Transfer Pump Replacements (-$652k) Cause: WRPS reprioritization of the pump replacement projects. The AZ-102 pump replacement mobilization for pump removal is now the successor to the AW-103 demobilization activities. In November 2017, the AW-103 project realized a risk AW103-008-R, pump plugged during flushing. This realized risk prioritized and accelerated the schedule for AW-103 to mobilize and perform pump flush activities. In addition, as a result of this realignment, mobilization and field work activities associated with the AZ-102 pump replacement project have been further delayed. AZ-102 mobilization is scheduled for mid-February. Impact: Due to the acceleration of AW-103 pump replacement, AZ-102 field mobilization has been delayed until after demobilization activities have completed for AW-103. However, the bottle change location has started at AZ-102 to prepare for mobilization and along with schedule recovery noted above the project demonstrated positive recovery in the current month. Corrective Action: Full schedule recovery for the design activities is planned upon the release of the AZ-102 As-Built ECN in March 2018 and full schedule recovery is anticipated for the fiscal year as current projections are demonstrating plant forces availability to complete execution.

SLIDE 39

39

Tank Farm Projects CTD Schedule Variances

January 2018

CTD SV January 2018 (-$8,600k)

5.1.4.1.85 242-A Spare Re-boiler (-$499k) Cause: Delayed receipt of the spare 242-A re-boiler currently undergoing fabrication. The re-boiler was originally anticipated to be received in September FY17; however, during the design review it was determined that an additional Finite Element Analysis (FEA) was needed to address nozzle loads of the vessel. Impact: The additional analysis has delayed the receipt of the spare re-boiler until April FY18 and will incur a negative schedule variance that will persist until receipt. Corrective Action: The additional analysis is complete and has been approved to allow the vendor to proceed with fabrication. 5.1.4.1.91 242-A Evaporator Fire Alarm Panel Upgrades (-$772k) Cause: Delay of installation as a result of an issue with original engineering change notice (ECN) needed for the installation. The subcontractor is currently working on a new fire alarm system ECN and project completion date is now March 31st. Impact: Currently no impact to any evaporator campaign and field work will be executed within available facility windows. Corrective Action: Project is working with contractor on schedule recovery plan. 5.1.4.1.94 Fire Alarm System Upgrades – 2704-HV & 222-S (-$375k) Cause: Two month delay in award of design subcontract as result of bidders’ requests to extend proposal period to find specialized fire systems subcontractor for sub-tier. Impact: No impact to other projects or evaporator campaigns. Corrective Action: Subcontractor is on board and forecasts finish April 2018.

SLIDE 40

40

Tank Farm Projects Schedule Recovery

January 2018

2017 Carryover Recovery (January $1,518k)  $ 313k Robotic crawler acceptance (Adaptive Energy)  $ 211k DST Transfer Pump AW-103 flush  $ 206k 242-A Process Condensate Station  $ 135k DST UT – AY-101 scanning  $ 96k TF Automation II fabrication  $ 92k SX Barrier Evapotranspiration Basin  $ 66k AP-801 Water Service Upgrade fabrication  $ 56k DST Structural AOR  $ 54k AP-107 design for DFLAW Upgrades  $ 49k Tank Chemistry Control - National Labs February  $ 450k DNFSB SS Flow installation – AW Farm CAT, AY/AZ Farm planning/install  $ 258k DST In-Pit Heating  $ 213k DST UT AY-101  $ 188k SST Visual Inspections – 3 videos  $ 176k SX Barrier Transpiration Basin  $ 148k Grab Sampling  $ 129k DST Improvement plan completion Kurion robotic fabrication/testing  $ 129k TF Automation Upgrades Phase II AP Farm  $ 118k AP-105 Tank Farm upgrades design Offset by (-$986k) DST Transfer Pump set up bottle tent AZ- 102 and AW-103 waiting tool fabrication March  $ 616k ETF Basin Cover replacement #2  $ 399k TF Automation Upgrades installation  $ 327k AP-105 TF Upgrades  $ 214k DST UT AY-101  $ 127k DNFSB SS Flow installation AY/AZ Farm April  $1,331k DST Transfer Pump install AZ-102  $ 395k DST In-Pit Heating installation  $ 320k ETF Basin Cover Replacement  $ 305k SX Barrier- North Asphalt cover  $ 285k TF Automation Phase II installation AN Farm  $ 178k DST UT AY-101/AZ-101  $ 141k DNFSB SS Flow installation – CAT AY/AZ Farm January Forecast Deltas ($66k)  $ 302k Acceptance Adaptive Energy Robotic Crawler  $ 297k SS Flow installation completed AW Farm  (-$189k) AP-105 Upgrades for DFLAW design review  (-$ 95k) SX Evapotranspiration basin drainage interferences resolution  (-$ 87k) DST In-Pit Heating SCBA masks  (-$ 84k) DST Transfer Pump AW-103 delays SCBA masks/weather

SLIDE 41

41

Tank Farm Projects Schedule Recovery

January 2018

SLIDE 42

42

Tank Farm Projects Performance - FY17 Carryover Forecast Recovery

January 2018 Previous 13,511k FY18 Acceleration ( 31k) SY Deferral ( 1,032k) December 12,479k Recovery Through January 53% Projected Recovery by April 79%

Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17 Jan-18 Feb-18 Mar-18 Apr-18 May-18 Jun-18 Jul-18 Aug-18 Sep-18 Grand Total 5.1.1.3.8 - Core & Grab Sampling incl. ORSS & Equip 1,653 18,184 18,184 147,295 156,091 341,408 5.1.1.5.11 - 242-A Integrity Assessment 6,001 40,767 13,572 8,566 68,906 5.1.1.5.16 - Waste Transf Sys FFU Encasemnt Testing (FY16) 89,031 89,031 5.1.1.5.20 - DST Integrity Improvement Plan 234,501 312,759 138,708 106,350 3,750 4,688 3,750 28,095 300,575 8,018 1,141,196 5.1.1.5.23 - CHEM-D-42 Leak Assessment 41,988 11,793 3,848 378 120 505 279 58,911 5.1.1.5.27 - DST Integrity Ultrasonic Testing FY17 133,727 191,475 76,364 135,422 212,363 213,942 178,073 208,151 244,435 94,477 617 1,689,045 5.1.1.5.28 - SST Integrity Visual Inspection 213 75,148 66,694 38,198 14,327 194,580 5.1.1.5.29 - Waste Transf Sys FFU Encasement Testing FY17 411 1,568 100,465 12,289 13,725 128,458 5.1.1.5.30 - DST Enhanced Annulus Visual Inspection FY17 20,554 1,082 4,121 25,757 5.1.1.5.31 - Tank Chemistry Control FY17 57,135 93,854 50,565 49,191 63,878 63,320 12,644 4,128 3,302 3,302 4,128 538 405,984 5.1.1.5.33 - FFS-Simulant Valve Testing 235 2,301 26,020 13,742 15,595 20,490 11,148 89,531 5.1.1.5.36 - DST Structural AOR to Support Tank Lvl Increase 4,834 4,834 67,111 55,722 89,611 71,259 56,777 50,622 400,770 5.1.1.5.45 - ETF Integrity Assessment 62,987 63,776 19,563 5,445 71,410 11,113 753 235,049 5.1.2.6.13 - Replace ETF Basin Covers 7,910 2,821 3,183 13,914 5.1.4.1.16 - TF Automation Upgrades (DNFSB Action 3-1) 5,979 813 715 325 11,160 565 575 21,317 30,826 72,276 5.1.4.1.18 - DST In-Pit Heating 48,121 99,955 26,416 33,299 417,697 114,318 15,455 39,866 5,615 15,300 816,042 5.1.4.1.20 - LOW Van Software/Hardware upgrades 7,758 703 5,661 24,418 38,541 5.1.4.1.22 - Replacement of AW-106 Pump and Jumpers 10,337 10,337 5.1.4.1.30 - Cross-Site Transfer Line Activation 10,182 3,394 18,106 31,682 5.1.4.1.44 - AP-801 Water Service Upgrade 9,686 22,993 14,070 66,108 8,673 121,530 5.1.4.1.48 - DNFSB Recommendation 2012-2 Act 2-2 thru 2-4 38,765 3,241 107,492 6,861 156,359 5.1.4.1.50 - 242-A Process Condensate Sampling Station 6,856 8,752 6,507 206,401 35,859 119,907 384,283 5.1.4.1.54 - Continuous Air Monitor Upgrades Evaluation 36,478 45,966 20,315 102,759 5.1.4.1.64 - DST Transfer Pump Replacements (FY17&18) 38,116 108,841 27,631 211,106 153,778 16,109 69,969 405,267 100,112 23,174 1,154,104 5.1.4.1.69 - Leak Detector Relay Replacement 48,249 49,401 1,027 513 5,599 104,789 5.1.4.1.77 - TF Automation Upgrades (FY17&18) 48,990 59,905 95,571 98,876 303,342 5.1.4.1.79 - AW-103 and AW-104 Electrical Upgrades 43,316 9,498 7,469 12,662 11,597 23,749 918 109,209 5.1.4.1.81 - AP-106 Transfer Pump Replacement 930,427 13,683 7,220 25,059 21,245 997,634 5.1.4.1.85 - 242-A Spare Reboiler 8,195 5,962 368 1,835 5,508 11,198 482,384 515,450 5.1.4.1.89 - Critical Transfer System Components 2,364 42,161 24,965 37,981 107,470 5.1.4.1.90 - 241-BY Farm Encapsulate Asbestos Insulation 2,072 2,072 5.1.4.1.91 - 242-A Evaporator Fire Alarm Panel Upgrades 1,485 1,485 5,963 19,795 27,713 27,708 502,558 194,376 781,083 5.1.4.1.92 - 242-A Control Room HVAC Upgrade 197,927 12,605 18,949 229,481 5.1.4.1.93 - Annulus Emergency Pumping Capability 12,751 3,416 18,431 34,597 5.1.4.1.94 - Fire Alarm System Upgrades - 2704HV & 222-S Lab 14,082 14,082 28,165 5.2.1.4.11 - Interim SX Barrier - Construction 261,767 4,078 5,072 92,099 363,016 5.3.2.6.10 - AP-105 Tank Farm Upgrades to Support DFLAW 73,674 230,253 303,927 5.3.2.6.8 - Project Management Upgrades support DFLAW 95,551 13,294 54,429 9,466 9,466 2,423 184,629 5.3.2.6.9 - AP-107 Tank Farm Upgrades to Support DFLAW 285,307 83,252 191,210 44,849 35,367 4,002 643,987 MONTHLY 2,344,721 1,489,931 1,320,439 1,518,269 1,515,667 820,151 853,770 1,212,465 616,667 154,663 467,915 164,647 12,479,304 CUMULATIVE 2,344,721 3,834,651 5,155,090 6,673,359 8,189,026 9,009,177 9,862,947 11,075,412 11,692,079 11,846,742 12,314,657 12,479,304

SLIDE 43

43

Tank Farm Projects FY18 Spend Plan

January 2018 January delta: $1,065k, 22.3 %

$297k DST Improvement Plan - acceptance of robotic crawler #1
$212k DNFSB Recommendation 2012-2 SS Flow Install AW Farm
$142k AP-107 Tank Farm Upgrades- completed parking lot
$129k Tank Farm Projects Oversight
$127k Safety Showers
$ 85k 242-A Process Condensate Sampling Station
$ 75kSST Integrity Visual Inspections (one additional)

FY Spend Forecast Delta $4,105k, 4.2%

$1,443k SX Interim Barrier South Asphalt construction award
$1,064k SX Interim Barrier North Asphalt construction award
$1,075k Annulus Emergency Pumping - Implemented BCR
$1,050k 222-S Fire Alarm System Upgrade - Implemented BCR
$ 471k AP-105 Tank Upgrades updates to align with CCRs
$ (650k) DST Transfer Pumps AW-103 savings - no tools and unplugging
$ (361k) DST Integrity Improvement Plan - defer deployment guided wave

PDN Delta ( $4,203k)

($1,443k) SX Interim Barrier South Asphalt construction award
($1,064k) SX Interim Barrier North Asphalt construction award
($1,075k) Annulus Emergency Pumping - Implemented BCR
($1,050k) 222-S Fire Alarm System Upgrade - Implemented BCR

ACWP/ETC Oct-17 (4W) Nov-17 (5W) Dec-17 (4W) Jan-18 (4W) Feb-18 (4W) Mar-18 (5W) Apr-18 (4W) May-18 (5W) Jun-18 (4W) Jul-18 (4W) Aug-18 (5W) Sep-18 (5W) FY Spend Forecast PDN Target Delta Nov-17 3,939 6,442 7,442 7,050 7,807 9,799 11,526 10,295 10,662 8,678 9,467 14,325 107,431 Dec-17 3,939 6,442 7,315 4,767 8,407 10,475 10,611 12,457 9,846 8,465 9,892 5,886 98,501 Jan-18 3,939 6,442 7,315 5,832 7,076 10,554 8,635 14,766 11,045 10,239 10,740 6,024 102,606 98,403

4,203

Delta

1,927
1,547
127

1,065 4,105 Percentage

32.9%
19.4%
1.7%

22.3% 4.2%

SLIDE 44

44

Tank Farm Projects Risks, Opportunities and Emergent Scope

January 2018

Risk

Schedule coordination of infrastructure projects with the 242-A Evaporator campaigns.
Access to AW Farm by multiple crews on SCBA.
Potential impacts from PFP work zone.
Coordination of work in AP Farm.
SX Barrier SCBA bottle requirements

Emergent Work Scope Realization Date Forecast Finish Funding Source 222-S Potable Water Air Gap Nov-16 TBD

Prod. Ops.

2704HV & 222S Fire System Panel Replacement - design only Dec-16 FY18 TFP ETF Lead-lag compressor design/install - BBL (Project Manager) Mar-17 TBD

Prod. Ops.

SX Barrier Construction (Third section) Apr-17 TBD TFP Emergency Annulus Pumping Design/Fabrication (not on contract) May-17 FY18 TFP Cross Site Transfer Lines Qualification & Monitoring (not on contract) May-17 TBD TFP AP Farm Change Trailer and Parking Lot May-17 TBD TFP ETF Facility Stairs/Platforms (PM) Jun-17 FY18

Prod. Ops

RCE Equipment (e.g. Core Sample Truck disposal) (PM and crew) Jun-17 TBD

Prod. Ops.

219S Integrity Assessment - Field work Jul-17 FY18 TFP ETF 310/311 Integrity Assessment (Proposal) Jul-17 FY18 TFP Predictive Maintenance Pilot (PM) Oct-17 FY18

Prod. Ops.

AY-102 Sample to support Retrieval Closure Oct-17 FY18 Retrieval U-107 LOW Replacement Jan-18 TBD

Prod. Ops.

TSCR Infrastructure Upgrades ( ORP Letter of Direction) (Proposal) TBD TBD TFP C-301 Visual Inspection and Direct Push Characterization Planning and field resources) Nov-17 FY18 Closure Sentinel Implementation (PM only) Jan-18 TBD

Prod. Ops

Tank Farm Projects FY17 Emergent Scope Tracker

SLIDE 45

45

Tank Farm Projects Accomplishments and Look Ahead

January 2018

Accomplishments: January:

Completed AW Farm SS flow instrumentation installation and electrical tie-in
Completed factory fabrication of AN and AP Farm Wireless Infrastructure Equipment
Completed two SST visual inspections (SX-113 and U-103)
Flushed AW-103 pump to verify extent of condition and laser measured for new

jumper.

Initiated drain pipe layout and backfill in SX Farm Evapotranspiration Basin.
Excavated SX Farm storm water vault locations and pipe trenches.
Received bids for SX Farm asphalt barrier.
Completed fabrication of removal tools for AZ-102 pump removal/replacement
Continued fabrication and assembly of the 242-A Evaporator Spare Re-boiler.
Initiated DST Annulus video inspections at AW Farm.
Placed the concrete pad and set the electrical rack for new AW Farm safety shower
Accepted Fab/Assembly report Kurion visual robotic crawler
Completed AP-107 Upgrades –parking lot.

Look Ahead: February:

Initiate AY/AZ Mechanical installation SS flow
Complete AP-801 mechanical/electrical installation of new water flow controller
Issue subcontract release for placement of SX asphalt barrier
Receive in-pit heaters for remaining pits installations and begin AN pit installation

activities

Complete final three SST visual inspections for FY18
AW-103/AW-104 electrical upgrade site preparation & trenching
Perform CAT SS flow instrumentation installation in AW Farm
Complete Encasement test SNL-5350

March:

SX Barrier Monitoring System installation Phase I
SX Farm Evapotranspiration Basin – Hydro-seed and Install fencing
Perform grab sampling AW-106
Perform grab sampling AW-105
Receive Visual Robotic crawler from Kurion
Complete AY/AZ Farm SS flow instrumentation mechanical installation
Install AZ-102 pump removal equipment
Complete AW Farm Enhanced Annulus Visual inspections
TF automation wireless equipment installation AP Farm
Complete 242-A Facility HVAC Upgrade

April:

Complete AY-101 UT
Continue Simulant Valve Testing (Flowserve & PBM Valves)
Complete AP Farm Enhanced Annulus Visual inspections
Receive 242-A Spare Reboiler

SLIDE 46

46

Tank Farm Projects Approved Baseline Change Requests Log

January 2018

BCR Number BCR Title Reporting Month FY18 (MR / XFER) FY18 (NEW) FY18 Total FY17 Baseline Running Total NA FY18 Baseline - Start of Fiscal Year (As of 10/01/17) September $0 $0 $0 $91,632,380 $91,632,380 RPP-18-024 AW-103 Pump Flush & AZ-102 Removal/Installation Re-plan November $453,171 $0 $453,171 $92,085,551 $453,171 $0 $453,171 $92,085,551 RPP-18-032 Move Remaining SY Exhauster Scope to UB for Removal from Contract December

$9,661,415

$0

$9,661,415

$82,424,136 RPP-18-033 Tank-Side Cesium Removal Balance of Plant December $0 $4,024,492 $4,024,492 $86,448,628 RPP-18-034 TFP Internal Re-planning December $0 $0 $0 $86,448,628

$9,661,415

$4,024,492

$5,636,923

$86,448,628 RPP-18-052 CP-17-004 Fire Alarm Panel Replacements (222-S Design Scope Addition & NTE Increase) January $0 $1,041,450 $1,041,450 $87,490,078 RPP-18-051 CP-17-017 Annulus Emergency Pumping Capability Scope Addition & NTE Increase January $0 $1,333,950 $1,333,950 $88,824,028 January 2018 $0 $2,375,400 $2,375,400 $88,824,028 RPP-18-077 AW-103 Pump Replacement Tool Fabrication Budget Return to MR February

$289,970

$0

$289,970

$88,534,058 RPP-18-078 Tank Farm Upgrades for WFD Internal Replanning February $0

$1,367,263
$1,367,263

$87,166,794 RPP-18-085 SX Barrier Construction Internal Replanning February $0 $0 $0 $87,166,794 February 2018

$289,970
$1,367,263
$1,657,233

$87,166,794 RPP-18-XXX ETF Basin Cover Detail Planning March $0 $0 $0 $87,166,794 RPP-18-XXX Cross Site Transfer Lines Add Permanent Power to 6241V (CP-17-018) March $0 $0 $0 $87,166,794 March 2018 $0 $0 $0 $87,166,794 RPP-18-035 TFP PMR Scope Adjustments $0 $87,166,794 RPP-18-040 U-107 Liquid Observation Well (LOW) Replacement TBD $0 $87,166,794 RPP-18-XXX Remove Flash Thermography Scope to UB for Removal from Contract TBD $0 $87,166,794 RPP-18-XXX MUST Assessment Report from BBL TBD $0 $87,166,794 TBD

$9,498,214

$5,032,629

$4,465,585

$87,166,794 November 2017 Cumulative Fiscal Year to Date October 2017 December 2017

SLIDE 47

47

Tank Farm Projects Contract Changes

January 2018

Title Project Manager Status NTE ($K) Total Impact ($K)

Contract Change

10,500 TBD FY18 10,500 TBD CP-16-017 DST Feed Delivery Upgrades in Support of DFLAW Stoner, Ryan 2/12/18: February BCR in process to stop at 60% design. Evaluating AP-105 field work execution. NTE required early March to continue execution. 1/8/18: Continuing to review scope of work for FY18 execution. February BCR will be processed to align PMB with path forward for the balance of the year. NTE forecast to exceed February this has been identified on TOC critical needs list for ORP CO to provide further increase. 4,000 20,425 CP-17-011 200-E-310/311 PL Transfer Lines Wood, Rob 2/12/18: Negotiations imminent and path forward for any FY18 execution to follow. 12/11/17: Awaiting ORP review and subsequent provision of NTE prior to processing scope addition. 11/13/17: NTE will be requested following ORP proposal review, anticipate December request. 10/19/17: IQRPE of transfer line approved on buyback list for execution. 1,651 CP-17-004 Fire Protection Upgrades Jansen, Jeff 2/12/18: NTE required to commence 222-S lab design. 1/29/18: January BCR will processed to add 222-S lab design for execution, further NTE need date has been updated following this addition. 8/24/17: Request for Proposal with submittal date of 12/20/17. 8/14/17: Included in FY18 all-in assessment. 500 TBD CP-17-017 Annulus Emergency Pumping Capability Follett, Jordan 2/12/18: NTE increase will be required to complete FY18 scope currently authorized in the PMB. 1/29/18: January BCR processed for further design and fabrication initiation, further NTE need date has been updated following addition 12/11/17: January BCR will be processed for further design and fabrication initiation, further NTE need date will be assessed following addition. 500 TBD CP-17-018 Cross Site Transfer Lines Qualification & Monitoring System May, Dustin 2/12/18: March BCR will be processed to add permanent power to 6241V, further NTE need date will be assessed in parallel with the addition. 8/24/17: Request for Proposal with submittal date of 12/20/17. 8/14/17: Included in FY18 all-in assessment. 500 TBD CP-18-006 Waste Feed Delivery Tank Farm Upgrades Ryan Stoner 2/12/18: Proposal in final stages of development ahead of Red / Green Team Reviews week of 2/19/18. February BCR in process to layout FY18 scope for execution. Will continue to evaluate need to re-align with what is executable in March. 1/29/18: Working towards proposal delivery 3/1/18. BCR development in parallel to begin under NTE authorization. 1/8/18: Continuing to review scope of work for FY18 execution. February BCR will be processed to align PMB with 5,000 TBD

ORP Review / Approval is or will be Required Further Not To Exceed Authorization will be Required Need for Contract Direction from ORP Developing Proposal

SLIDE 48

48

Tank Farm Projects Risk Status

January 2018

SLIDE 49

Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan January 2018

BY Farm Jig Comparison Head Space Sampling

SLIDE 50

50

Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Project Key Deliverables

January 2018 FY2018 Key Deliverables Target Forecast PBI-44.0.1: Complete Installation of Stack Monitoring in AW, AX (2), AN, and 702-AZ SEP 2018 SEP 2018 PBI-44.0.2: Compete Field Installation and Functional Testing of PA System in B, BX, BY, S, SX, SY, T, TX, TY, and U farms. SEP 2018 AUG 2018 PBI-44.0.3: Complete SST Automation Upgrades at TY Farm SEP 2018 JUL 2018 PBI-44.0.4: Complete NUCON Bench Scale Test and Summary Report SEP 2018 SEP 2018 PBI-44.0.5.1: Complete Initial Factory Acceptance Testing of Strobic Unit MAR 2018 MAR 2018 PBI-44.0.5.2: Complete Second Phase of Off-site Strobic Demonstration and Prepare Results Summary SEP 2018 SEP 2018 PBI-44.0.6: Complete Field Installation and Turnover AW Stack Extension to Operation SEP 2018 SEP 2018 PBI-44.0.7: Complete Six (6) Cartridge Testing Iterations SEP 2018 JUN 2018 Issue Quantitative Risk Analyses (QRA) for six (6) tank farms SEP 2018 SEP 2018

SLIDE 51

51

Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Project Performance Current Month/Fiscal Year

January 2018 FYTD SV Forecast $4,104K :

FY17 Carryover Recovery
PA System: AP & C farm installation and testing
VMDS: AP farm equipment turnover
Head space: BY farm jig comparison testing
C2Sense Prototype development
Enhanced auto-sampler development
SST Stewardship: TY Automation design
702AZ, AN, AW, and AX Stack Monitors OAT & Turnover (-$209k)

FYTD CV Forecast -$1,202K :

Chemical Cartridge: National Lab increased support to aid in cartridge testing

reports and development of future sampling strategy document (-$506k)

New Vapor Technologies: Increased vendor support to complete development of

enhanced auto-sampler. (-$315k) and ongoing Fowler support (-$316k)

CVAP Management Commitment: Increased off-site sampling costs related to

CVAP scopes of work and increased national laboratory support in CVAP Studies and Abatement scopes (-$533k)

NUCON Vapor Abatement: Higher than planned costs for off-site testing support

(-$334k) Offset partially by:

VMDS:
VMDS Stack Monitor OAT & Turnover moved to FY19
AP Turnover team smaller than planned as resources are shared

between several different scopes of work ($892k)

WBS BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV SPI CPI BAC FCST P FY Spend FCSTSV FCSTCV TCPI FCST P 5.01.05.11.01 - 1-SC1 - Plan for Tank Head Space Sample

6
6

6

9

5 9 4 0.58 5.01.05.11.09 - 9-DR1 - Head Space & Stack Sampling

82

83 82

1
82

85 82

2
0.97
504

361 504 142 1.52 5.01.05.11.33 - 33-RM6 - New Vapor Detection Technology

4
4
219

92 68 311 24 (0.42) 1.36

219

92 64 311 28

5.01.05.11.48 - CVAP Management Commitment

263 263 304

42

1,204 1,204 1,400

196

1.00 0.86 4,061 4,061 4,594

533

0.89 5.01.05.11.49 - New Vapor Detection Technologies 204 317 418 114

101

1,408 1,222 2,285

187
1,063

0.87 0.53 3,640 4,180 4,824 540

644

1.16 5.01.05.11.51 - Head Space & Stack Sampling

3
3
2

5 2

3
0.35

214 395 391 181 4 1.02 5.01.05.11.52 - Chemical Cartridge Evaluations 141 257 365 117

107

645 659 876 15

216

1.02 0.75 3,165 3,165 3,671

506

0.90 5.01.05.11.53 - Tank Farms PA Systems for Event Notification 273 102 82

171

20 1,341 744 871

598
128

0.55 0.85 3,295 4,015 4,296 720

281

0.96 5.01.05.11.54 - Chemical Vapor Engineered Control Upgrades 115 139 65 24 74 404 654 455 250 199 1.62 1.44 3,035 3,203 3,128 167 74 0.95 5.01.05.11.55 - Strobic Air Upgrade 53 15 9

39

6 244 233 44

11

189 0.96 5.28 2,576 2,866 2,899 290

34

0.92 5.01.05.11.56 - Vapor Monitoring & Detection System Upgrades 276 180 1,211

96
1,030

2,899 1,528 2,621

1,371
1,093

0.53 0.58 8,353 8,851 7,959 499 892 1.37 5.01.05.11.57 - Industrial Hygiene Trailer 9 39 10 30 29 368 90 103

277
13

0.25 0.87 1,871 2,130 2,261 258

131

0.95 5.01.05.11.58 - SST Stewardship Program 92 38 111

53
73

515 193 321

322
129

0.37 0.60 2,089 2,476 2,464 387 11 1.07 5.01.05.11.59 - NUCON Vapor Abatement 138 260 292 122

32

851 626 653

225
27

0.74 0.96 2,032 2,109 2,443 77

334

0.83 5.01.05.11.60 - CVAP 222-S Laboratory Upgrades

11

5 11 7 546 108 21

437

88 0.20 5.28 546 707 604 162 104 1.03 Total 1,564 1,705 2,961 141

1,256

10,205 7,444 9,808

2,762
2,364

0.73 0.76 34,658 38,762 39,963 4,104

1,202

1.04 Current Month FYTD FY End

SLIDE 52

52

Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Current Month Predominant Cost and Schedule Variances

January 2018

Current Month Schedule ($141K) Current Month Cost (-$1,256K) 5.1.5.11.53 – Tank Farms PA System for Event Notification (-$171k) Cause: The current-month unfavorable schedule variance is due to delay in the expected installation of Reader boards. Reader boards purchase order has been completed with expected delivery of 2/20/18. Reader board location design has been completed and construction/installation is expected to begin in March. Corrective Action: No corrective action required, current month variance. 5.1.5.11.49 – New Vapor Detection Technologies(-$101k) Cause: The current-month unfavorable cost variance is predominantly driven by greater than anticipated duration and associated cost for technical subcontract support for vapor monitoring and detection system (VMDS) support at AP farm pilot operations. Technical support contracts have been extended through February FY18. The usage variance is a result of four additional months of support than originally planned. The project team is working to complete necessary turnover and procedural update tasks. Corrective Action: No corrective action required for current-month variance. 5.1.5.11.59 – NUCON Vapor Abatement ($122k) Cause: The favorable current month schedule variance is the result of schedule acceleration directly related to the decision to move to Phase 2 Diesel Testing. The overall delay was anticipated and addressed in BCR- 18-015 with the elimination of the 2nd NUCON bench scale test and the repurposing of the propane test to diesel testing. As a result, various diesel testing related activities such as the design of the Diesel unit and the modifications to the VAU to accept diesel have been accelerated in order to complete the repurposed propane to diesel bench scale testing activities which are behind schedule currently. Corrective Action: No corrective action necessary for the current month variance. 5.1.5.11.52 – Chemical Cartridge Evaluation (-$107k) Cause: The unfavorable current month cost variance is due to a miscommunication of labor charging direction between the head space sampling and cartridge testing projects. This has resulted in a 2 day window of labor charges impacting the account which are to be corrected by the next reporting period. Corrective Action: No corrective action required for current-month variance. 5.1.5.11.52 – Chemical Cartridge Evaluation ($117k) Cause: The favorable current month schedule variance is attributed to the late start and completion of cartridge testing reports and 3rd party reviews by a subcontractor. The reviews were originally scheduled to have been initiated back in October 2017. Report development and 3rd party review support is currently on schedule and the initial delays in reviewing will have no impact on project completion. Corrective Action: No corrective action necessary for the current month variance. 5.1.5.11.56 – VMDS Upgrades (-$1,030k) Cause: The current month unfavorable cost variance is the result of an inaccurate accrual accounting for progress payments to fabricate and deliver spectroscopy equipment. Progress payments were over accrued where no milestone was reached. Corrective Action: No corrective action required for current-month variance.

SLIDE 53

53

Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Project Performance Cumulative to Date

January 2018

WBS

BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV SPI CPI BAC TCPI

5.01.05.11.01 - 1-SC1 - Plan for Tank Head Space Sample

225 222 285

3
62

0.99 0.78 225 0.58

5.01.05.11.09 - 9-DR1 - Head Space & Stack Sampling

4,110 3,689 2,526

421

1,163 0.90 1.46 4,110 1.52

5.01.05.11.33 - 33-RM6 - New Vapor Detection Technology

17,613 17,613 16,771

842

1.00 1.05 17,613

5.01.05.11.48 - CVAP Management Commitment

5,914 5,914 6,421

507

1.00 0.92 8,771 0.89

5.01.05.11.49 - New Vapor Detection Technologies

8,907 8,181 10,401

726
2,220

0.92 0.79 11,139 1.16

5.01.05.11.51 - Head Space & Stack Sampling

190 11 17

179
6

0.06 0.65 404 1.02

5.01.05.11.52 - Chemical Cartridge Evaluations

5,770 5,785 5,480 15 305 1.00 1.06 8,290 0.90

5.01.05.11.53 - Tank Farms PA Systems for Event Notification

4,686 3,368 3,256

1,318

113 0.72 1.03 6,640 0.96

5.01.05.11.54 - Chemical Vapor Engineered Control Upgrades

1,511 1,594 2,037 83

443

1.05 0.78 4,143 0.95

5.01.05.11.55 - Strobic Air Upgrade

641 340 100

301

240 0.53 3.39 2,972 0.92

5.01.05.11.56 - Vapor Monitoring & Detection System Upgrades

4,648 2,570 4,610

2,078
2,040

0.55 0.56 10,102 1.31

5.01.05.11.57 - Industrial Hygiene Trailer

680 144 170

535
26

0.21 0.85 2,183 0.95

5.01.05.11.58 - SST Stewardship Program

976 267 358

709
91

0.27 0.75 2,550 1.07

5.01.05.11.59 - NUCON Vapor Abatement

1,367 1,065 1,076

302
12

0.78 0.99 2,548 0.83

5.01.05.11.60 - CVAP 222-S Laboratory Upgrades

730 131 31

599

100 0.18 4.26 730 1.03

Total

85,463 78,389 80,364

7,074
1,975

0.92 0.98 109,915 1.03 Cumulative to Date

SLIDE 54

54

Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Cumulative to Date Predominant Cost and Schedule Variances

January 2018

CTD Schedule (-$7,074K) CTD Cost (-$1,975K) 5.1.5.11.53 – Tank Farms PA System for Event Notification (-$1,318k) Cause: The contract-to-date unfavorable schedule variance is predominately driven by; 1) Delayed west area PA system procurements ($830k). The Material request for the remaining speaker poles, mounts, and batteries was completed on 12/5/17 and is expected to arrive on 2/15/18. 2)Delayed west area PA system reader boards ($133k). Reader boards have been ordered and are expected to arrive after a 12 week lead time on 3/5/18. 3) The delayed start of construction for the permanent public address system around the east area tank farms ($314k). The variance is caused by upfront design delays following a late contract award as upfront scoping agreements took longer than anticipated for east area farms. An Engineering change request was required for re-work of failed PA system batteries. Vendor has had insufficient resources to provide for field work activities. Work is on-going in AP & C farm and is expected to be completed by 1/30/18. Corrective Action: The Material request for the remaining speaker poles, mounts, and batteries was completed on 12/5/18 and is expected to arrive on 2/15/18. Reader boards have been ordered and are expected to arrive after a 12 week lead time on 3/5/18. 5.1.5.11.49 – New Vapor Detection Technologies (-$2,220k) Cause: The contract to date unfavorable cost variance is predominantly driven by greater than anticipated duration and associated cost for technical subcontract support for vapor monitoring and detection system support at AP pilot operations and over-arching technical support during design development of placement of VMDS equipment. Corrective Action: The project manager will continue to monitor need for technical subcontracts and work to scale back support as farms get closer to turnover to operations. 5.1.5.11.60 – CVAP 222-S Laboratory Upgrades (-$599k) Cause: The cumulative to date schedule variance is primarily due to the delayed procurement of the GC mass spectrometer. Subcontracting issues related to the procurement of the equipment have been resolved and the procurement contract has been issued with an anticipated receipt date of February. Installation and renovation activities will follow and are expected to begin in March. Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. Installation & renovation activities are expected to conclude in August 5.1.5.11.9 – Head Space & Stack Sampling ($1,163k) Cause: The favorable contract-to-date variance is due to usage efficiencies attributed to field labor support usage and diminished Crane & Rigging support to Head Space & Exhaust Stack Sampling in FY16. After carrying out initial samples, it was determined that 1) Less than anticipated NCO's, IHT's, HPT's, and plant engineers are required to complete samples, 2) samples can be completed with less than originally planned Crane & Rigging support because the riser caps being accessed to perform sampling can be removed manually rather than requiring Crane & Rigging support as was initially planned, and 3) exhaust stack samples are able to be completed in tandem with head space samples utilizing the same crew. Corrective Action: No corrective action required. Cost variance is favorable and project anticipates continued efficiencies carrying out future samples. Anticipated savings are reflected in the EAC.

SLIDE 55

55

Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Cumulative to Date Predominant Cost and Schedule Variances

January 2018

CTD Schedule (-$7,074K) CTD Cost (-$1,975K) 5.1.5.11.49 – New Vapor Detection Technologies (-$726k) Cause: The contract-to-date unfavorable variance is driven by: 1)Delays in technical subcontract support for vapor monitoring and detection system over arching technical support during design development of placement of VMDS equipment. The activity delays were a result from multiple revisions of design development due to unforeseen complications and issues regarding placement

f VMDS equipment.

2)Delays in developing the enhanced auto sampler unit. Final design and procurement of necessary materials to develop the auto sampler required UV-DOAS equipment specifications which were unavailable until early October FY18 after stack monitor designs for AN, AW, and AZ were completed. Corrective Action: 1) Final work packages are being executed and closed out to finalize VMDS pilot testing technical subcontract support. Completion of these activities is anticipated in January FY17. 2) UV-DOAS equipment specifications have been received by vendor and being incorporated into the design

f the enhanced auto sampler unit. WRPS engineering are working closely with vendor to ensure proper

design inputs and materials are ordered. Procurements will be done in parallel and several sub-components

f the enhanced auto sampler will be FAT tested on an interim basis prior to a final integrated FAT in hopes

to resolve any potential issues early on in the process. 5.1.5.11.56 – Vapor Monitoring Detection System Upgrades (-$2,040k) Cause: The cumulative to date unfavorable cost variance is a labor usage variance resulting from more than anticipated design labor support due to a change in project strategy in order to meet the project milestone to complete three farms' design packages by the end of September FY17, specifically for AW, AN, and AZ stacks. Corrective Action: There are no corrective actions planned at the current time. The unfavorable variance is not anticipated to be fully recovered for design effort. 5.1.5.11.56 – Vapor Monitoring & Detection System Upgrades (-$2,078k) Cause: The cumulative to date unfavorable variance is driven by 1)Delayed receipt of fence-line monitoring equipment. Upfront procurement process and contract award to vendor was delayed to allow further time to finalize specifications for the equipment. Progress payments are being throughout procurement process. ($524k) 2)Delays in turnover procedural development and final OAT & Test Report development for AP Farm

readiness. ($897k)

3)AW farm stack monitor work package planning & field installation delayed awaiting final equipment specifications, functional requirements, and vendor QA resolution. ($375k) Corrective Action: 1) Identify and revise necessary procedures to integrate VMDR system into farm operations. Project manager is currently coordinating this effort with procedures organization. 2) Work package closeout for Pilot Scale Testing required prior to turnover of equipment. Engineering staff has been assigned to monitor and status closeout of each ECN and work package. 3) Project representatives will be sent to vendor location to support ongoing development of their quality assurance program to meet tank farm's needs. Following QA development and sign-off procurements can proceed. 5.1.5.11.33 – 33-RM6 New Vapor Detection Technology ($842k) Cause: The cumulative to date favorable cost variance is attributed to the following: 1) result of conversion of planned field installation and testing resources from plant forces direct labor to construction forces subcontract and 2) the utilization of less than anticipated support for the amount of work accomplished in September and October 2016 as testing normalized and focus shifted to report production. The cumulative to date favorable cost variance was partially offset by greater than anticipated subcontractor usage cost from the following: 1) the construction subcontractor support due to initial training requirements and greater than anticipated material needed for installation, 2) unanticipated usage cost from the construction subcontractor and the national laboratory for additional support needed to troubleshoot, calibrate, and integrate the software of new detection technology equipment, 3) ongoing greater than anticipated national laboratory usage cost in delivery of bench scale test report. Extended duration as a result

f delays in original equipment receipt led to increased cost and prolonged installation timeline and 4) Final

construction contractor CAL settlement and invoicing. Corrective Action: No corrective action required as this is a favorable cumulative to date cost variance.

SLIDE 56

56

Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Project Schedule Recovery

January 2018

CM Schedule Forecast Variance: -$272k

Head Space Sampling Material

Procurements (-$107k)

PA System (-$88k)
Strobic Air Submittals (-$65k)

Recovery Discussion: $7,047k

PA System ($1,318k):
A complex turnover - February
Reader Board receipt and Install March – April
West Area equipment procurements – March
New Vapor Technology: Enhanced Auto-sampler

development ($370k) - June

VMDS AP farm testing and readiness/turnover ($983k)
June
VMDS fence-line monitors equipment receipt ($524k)

– May/June

SST Automation ($709k): TY Farm Design & Field Work
August
Head Space Sampling ($603k): Cartridge jig validation

testing & associated procurements - March

Strobic Air ($301k): Strobic test plan and Strobic Air

support - April

10-wide Trailer ($535k): 10-wide trailer procurement

and site design awaiting State review - June

CVAP 222-S Lab Upgrades ($599k): Room 4S

equipment upgrade planning, design, and equipment receipt - August EOY Schedule Forecast Variance: -$209k

FY19 completion of VMDS stack

monitors Operations Acceptance Testing and turnover

SLIDE 57

57

Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Project Schedule Recovery

January 2018

Recovery Discussion

Recovery SV: AP farm

equipment turnover in FM June

Fence-line monitor receipt in

May.

Stack Monitor installation June

through September

EOY Variance: Stack Monitors

OAT & Turnover Recovery Discussion

Receipt of equipment in

March FY18. Field work to initiate in Q3 of FY18. Recovery Discussion

Recovery SV: AP/C farm

completion in February

Receipt of West Area

procurements in March

SLIDE 58

58

Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Project Spend Plan

January 2018 January Delta: -$140K, -4.5%

Strobic Air Upgrade vendor submittals were not received as originally scheduled ($341k)
PA System AP & C farm turnover pushed into February ($183k)
Jig Comparison Sampling moved into February following stop work ($112k)
SST Stewardship savings on ENRAF procurements, late receipt of thermocouples, and delay starting MSA network development activities($151k)
Auto Sampler development costs less than forecasted due to delay in critical procurement and CCR to contract ($230k)
VMDS accrual error for fence-line monitoring equipment progress payments (-$997k)
Chemical Cartridge Evaluation labor mischarging, corrections underway (-$180k)

Spend Forecast: $2,625K, 7.0%

Implementation of BCR to add in AW Stack Extension fabrication and field installation activities.

PDN Delta: $2,528k

Implementation of BCR to add in AW Stack Extension fabrication and field installation activities.

ACWP/ETC Oct-17 (4W) Nov-17 (5W) Dec-17 (4W) Jan-18 (4W) Feb-18 (4W) Mar-18 (5W) Apr-18 (4W) May-18 (5W) Jun-18 (4W) Jul-18 (4W) Aug-18 (5W) Sep-18 (5W) FY Spend Forecast PDN Target Nov-17 1,617 2,771 2,546 3,366 3,633 4,683 3,624 4,063 4,016 2,857 2,330 2,064 37,570 Dec-17 1,617 2,771 2,458 3,102 3,999 4,771 3,147 4,526 4,080 3,008 2,053 1,807 37,338 Jan-18 1,617 2,771 2,458 2,961 1,889 4,927 4,355 6,431 3,944 3,534 2,828 2,248 39,963 37,435 Delta

140

2,625 Percentage

4.5%

7.0%

SLIDE 59

59

Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Project Accomplishments & Look Ahead

January 2018 Accomplishments January:

Completed AW Stack Extension final design
Drafted AN farm Basis of Design
Completed NUCON Vapor Abatement Unit Final Test Plan
Installed PA system in AP farm
Evaporator QRA/Basis of Design Approved

Look Ahead February:

Complete draft SST Stewardship Execution Strategy Document
Draft AX and AY/AZ Basis of Designs for QRA
Complete AX farm stack monitor 60% design
Jig validation comparison head space sampling in BY farm
PA System turnover to Operations in A-complex
Submit Final UV-DOAS Cerex Stack Monitor Design AN & AZ farms

March:

Award Contract - AW Stack Extension Fabrication/Construction
222S 4S Renovation Draft Design
10-wide IH Trailer 90% site design
PA System reader-boards receipt
CVAP 222-S Lab Upgrades receipt and field work kickoff
Strobic Factory Acceptance Testing
NUCON diesel unit shipment and testing setup
Draft AN farm QRA
BY-108 Cartridge Testing
PA System West Area equipment procurements
Release stack monitor F&RD
Award Stack Monitor Install construction contract - AN and 702-AZ

April:

Continued PAPR cartridge testing
PA System west area field work – S, SX, and SY farms
IH Trailer construction contract award
Release TY farm automation design
Approve and Release Strobic Mockup Test Plan
AW Stack Extension construction kickoff - Excavation and Foundation
Approve AY/AZ QRA
Ongoing NUCON testing

SLIDE 60

60

Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Project Baseline Change Log

January 2018

BCR Number BCR Title Reporting Month BCR Level FY18 Total FY18 Baseline Running Total RPP-17-134 Fiscal Year 2018 Planning September FY17 2 46,068 $ 46,068 $ RPP-18-016 Move Phase I Autosampler Scope to UB October FY18 2 (219) $ 45,849 $ RPP-18-015 NUCON Vapor Abatement Propane Test and PTR-MS Re- plan October FY18 3 352 $ 46,201 $ RPP-18-054 AW Stack Extension Field Work January FY18 3 2,152 $ 48,353 $ 48,353 $ FY18 Total

SLIDE 61

61

Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Project Contract Change Log

January 2018

Title Project Manager BCR Level Status Total Impact ($K) Contract Change 105,221 FY17/18 105,221 CP-17-009 Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Gagnon, Paul

NTE increase to $49.3M received 2/6/18.

105,221

SLIDE 62

62

Comprehensive Vapor Action Plan Top Risk Items

January 2018

Risk Id Title Org. Risk Owner Handling Actions Current Risk level Trend CVAPP-007-R

Excessive Work Stoppages

DOE- ORP/T OC

Gagnon, Paul A (1) Pre-plan for work stoppages based on historical data. (2) Additional Communication to workforce (3) POD vapors updates (4) Actively publishing/sharing of IH measurement data to reassure workforce (5) Move work offshift to minimize impacts from recovery actions (septic pumping, purex collapse). (6) Modify shift schedules to lower risk of AOP15s.

Medium

CVAPP-010-R

Lack of Critical Technical Expertise

TOC

Gagnon, Paul A (1) Identify key technical resources up front and secure availability. (2) Develop succession plan, critical resources retainment plan and development of necessary engineering resources. (3) Bring CEREX resource in house (4) Dedicated Job Title and Team for Vapors Engineering

Medium

CVAPP-023-R

Internal Reviews Take Longer Than Anticipated

TOC

Gagnon, Paul A (1) assign expediter to projec to speed process

Medium

CVAPP-026-R

3rd Party Evaluation and/or Subcontractor Testing Cause Delays

DOE- ORP/T OC

Gagnon, Paul A (1) Engage 3rd party and/or subcontractor leadership in communicating status. (2) Develop formal communication plan between senior leadership and 3rd party reviewers. (3) Scheduled site visit to finalize 3rd party report.

Medium

Specific Engineering resources are single point failures, lacking defense in depth. Risk increased to High (7-6-17) Risk of single point failure in critical technical expertise has been noted to be a threat to achieving PBIs in FY18. (12-19- 17) Risk lowered to medium due to internal reviews complete (1-30- 17) New sets of internal reviews have been delayed or late, increasing risk level to high. Some internal reviews are delayed due to technical resource limitations (7-6- 17) Additional delays to 3rd party reviews have resulted in prolonged use of SCBA, increasing the duration of inefficiency in field work. 7-6-17 Hazard assessments must go back through 3rd party reviews, risk impacted by CVAP-32, litigation pushing 3rd party into

Current Risk Level Description

HAMTC Stop work for all activities which cause or may potentially cause emission of chemical vapors including instrusive sluicing, retrieval, trasnfers, pumping, sampling, mixing, breaching, venting, vessel dump, air abatement, leaks, spills, airlift circulation, caustic additions,

SLIDE 63

LAWPS January 2018

SLIDE 64

64

LAWPS Overview

January 2018

FY End WBS BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV SPI CPI BAC EAC VAC TCPI FCST P BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV SPI CPI BAC TCPI 5.05.01.02.01 - E - LAWPS - Concept. Design - Project Management

1,030

1,030 970

60

1.00 1.06 1,030

5.05.01.02.02 - E - LAWPS - Concept. Design - Project Support
2,809

2,809 3,213

404

1.00 0.87 2,809

5.05.01.02.03 - E - LAWPS - Concept. Design - Permitting
160

160 57

103

1.00 2.82 160

5.05.01.02.04 - E - LAWPS - Concept. Design - Safety Analysis
7
7
7
7
689

689 648

41

1.00 1.06 689

5.05.01.02.05 - E - LAWPS - Concept. Design - Technology Matur.
816

816 495

321

1.00 1.65 816

5.05.01.02.06 - E - LAWPS - Concept. Design - Design
4,236

4,236 4,296

60

1.00 0.99 4,236

5.05.03.02.01 - P - LAWPS - Design Project Management (PM)

144 144 106

38

662 662 601

61

1.00 1.10 4,108 4,124

16

0.98 4,417 4,417 4,979

562

1.00 0.89 7,863 0.98 5.05.04.02.01 - P - LAWPS - Design - Project Support (PS) 503 372 282

132

90 2,211 1,726 1,705

485

20 0.78 1.01 3,633 3,644

12

0.84 13,407 12,898 15,577

509
2,679

0.96 0.83 14,829 1.00 5.05.05.01.01 - E - LAWPS - Permitting Dev., Prep & Reviews 16 11 23

5
12

72 49 114

22
65

0.69 0.43 111 175

64

0.79 1,335 1,304 946

32

357 0.98 1.38 1,375 1.17 5.05.06.02.01 - P - LAWPS - Design Safety Analysis 25 35 32 10 3 126 139 233 13

94

1.10 0.60 244 537

293

1.25 1,811 1,507 1,789

304
282

0.83 0.84 1,928 1.39 5.05.07.01.01 - P - LAWPS - Tech Maturation Program & Misc Tests 19 19 4

16

73 73 28

45

1.00 2.61 122 84 38 0.86 1,046 1,046 697

350

1.00 1.50 1,095 0.86 5.05.07.01.02 - P - LAWPS - Tech Mature. Integrated Scale Test 444 323 288

121

35 2,048 1,889 1,558

158

331 0.92 1.21 3,152 2,795 358 1.24 27,200 26,715 26,239

485

477 0.98 1.02 28,305 1.29 5.05.07.01.03 - P - LAWPS - Tech Maturation Full Scale Test 20

20
90
90
197

196 1 0.87 117

117
223

1.14 5.05.08.02.01 - P - LAWPS - Design System Integration 553

553
4,007

1,792 1,687

2,215

104 0.45 1.06 7,169 7,261

92

1.00 20,702 18,012 18,254

2,690
242

0.87 0.99 23,865 1.05 5.05.08.02.02 - P - LAWPS - Design Reagent Systems 30

30
203

61 100

142
38

0.30 0.62 471 600

129

1.00 1,183 951 834

232

117 0.80 1.14 1,452 1.00 5.05.08.02.03 - P - LAWPS - Design Primary Pretreat System 262

262
979

473 440

506

33 0.48 1.08 2,040 2,078

38

1.00 5,244 4,667 6,219

577
1,552

0.89 0.75 6,305 1.00 5.05.08.02.04 - P - LAWPS - Design HVAC System 31

31

297 257 142

40

115 0.87 1.81 775 808

32

1.00 2,073 1,886 2,101

187
215

0.91 0.90 2,552 1.00 5.05.08.02.05 - P - LAWPS - Design Solid Waste System 31

31
40

3

40
3

(0.00) (0.00) 85 86

2

1.00 329 291 102

39

189 0.88 2.86 374 1.00 5.05.08.02.06 - P - LAWPS - Design Balance of Plant System 311

2
311
2

1,364 313 570

1,051
257

0.23 0.55 3,409 4,001

592

1.00 7,172 5,786 7,425

1,386
1,639

0.81 0.78 9,217 1.00 5.05.08.02.07 - P - LAWPS - Design Facilities System 355

355

1,137 375 1,005

762
630

0.33 0.37 2,659 4,590

1,931

1.00 7,360 5,297 8,549

2,063
3,252

0.72 0.62 8,882 1.00 5.05.08.02.08 - P - LAWPS - Design Project Management & Support 1,206 589 658

617
69

3,852 2,421 2,880

1,431
459

0.63 0.84 8,751 9,324

572

0.98 18,549 17,084 17,446

1,465
362

0.92 0.98 23,449 0.99 5.05.08.02.09 - P - LAWPS - Build to Print

19

28 196 9

168

1.45 0.14 968 1,734

766

1.00 2,070 1,480 1,562

590
82

0.72 0.95 3,018 1.00 5.05.11.02.01 - P - LAWPS - Long Lead Procurements Design 625

4
625

4 2,773 2,342 2,434

431
92

0.84 0.96 3,840 4,463

623

0.91 7,344 6,346 6,200

998

146 0.86 1.02 8,411 1.02 Total 4,576 1,494 1,391

3,082

103 19,953 12,601 13,704

7,351
1,102

0.63 0.92 41,734 46,507

4,774

0.99 131,101 119,427 128,597

11,674
9,170

0.91 0.93 152,882 1.02 Current Month FYTD Cumulative to Date

SLIDE 65

65

LAWPS Schedule and Cost Forecast

January 2018

SLIDE 66

January 2018 66

LAWPS Current Month Variances

Schedule

5.5.4.2.1 P - LAWPS - Design - Project Support (PS) -$132k Cause: On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an

ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the previous LAWPS design. Following the External Expert Review, on November 16, 2017 WRPS received

Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the previous LAWPS

design. As a result, on November 29, 2017, WRPS terminated the subcontract previously established for Seismic Testing of the LAWPS Jumper Connectors. This

scope will reside in the project's PMB until a BCR is implemented to remove the associated remaining BCWS. Until then, unfavorable schedule variances will continue to be realized, -$129k. Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect. 5.5.7.1.2 P - LAWPS - Tech Mature. Integrated Scale Test -$121k Cause: On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an

ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the previous LAWPS design. Following the External Expert Review, on November 16, 2017 WRPS received

Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the previous LAWPS

design. As a result, AECOM CFF foulant testing activities have been placed on hold pending formal direction from DOE regarding the LAWPS re-scoping effort. This

scope will reside in the project's PMB until a BCR is implemented to remove the associated remaining BCWS. Until then, unfavorable schedule variances will continue to be realized, -$119k. Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect.

SLIDE 67

January 2018 67

LAWPS Current Month Variances

Schedule

5.5.8.2.1 P - LAWPS - Design System Integration -$533k Cause: On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an

ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the previous LAWPS design. Following the External Expert Review, on November 16, 2017 WRPS received

Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the previous LAWPS

design. As a result, on November 20, 2017, WRPS issued a Stop Work Order to the Architect Engineer (A/E), requesting that they cease further progress of the

previous design. The current delay being experienced in this account is a direct result of the stop work. Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect. 5.5.8.2.3 P - LAWPS - Design Primary Pretreat System -$262k Cause: On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an

ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the previous LAWPS design. Following the External Expert Review, on November 16, 2017 WRPS received

Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the previous LAWPS

design. As a result, on November 20, 2017, WRPS issued a Stop Work Order to the Architect Engineer (A/E), requesting that they cease further progress of the

previous design. The current delay being experienced in this account is a direct result of the stop work. Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect. 5.5.8.2.6 P - LAWPS - Design Balance of Plant System -$311k Cause: On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an

ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the previous LAWPS design. Following the External Expert Review, on November 16, 2017 WRPS received

Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the previous LAWPS

design. As a result, on November 20, 2017, WRPS issued a Stop Work Order to the Architect Engineer (A/E), requesting that they cease further progress of the

previous design. The current delay being experienced in this account is a direct result of the stop work. Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect.

SLIDE 68

January 2018 68

LAWPS Current Month Variances

Schedule

5.5.8.2.7 P - LAWPS - Design Facilities System -$355k Cause: On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an

ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the previous LAWPS design. Following the External Expert Review, on November 16, 2017 WRPS received

Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the previous LAWPS

design. As a result, on November 20, 2017, WRPS issued a Stop Work Order to the Architect Engineer (A/E), requesting that they cease further progress of the

previous design. The current delay being experienced in this account is a direct result of the stop work. Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect. 5.5.8.2.8 P - LAWPS - Design Project Management & Support -$617k Cause: On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an

ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the previous LAWPS design. Following the External Expert Review, on November 16, 2017 WRPS received

Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the previous LAWPS

design. As a result, on November 20, 2017, WRPS issued a Stop Work Order to the Architect Engineer (A/E), requesting that they cease further progress of the

previous design. The current delay being experienced in this account is a direct result of the stop work. Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect. 5.5.11.2.1 P - LAWPS - Long Lead Procurements Design -$625k Cause: On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an

ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the previous LAWPS design. Following the External Expert Review, on November 16, 2017 WRPS received

Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the previous LAWPS

design. As a result, the final design package for the ASME Tanks has been placed on hold pending an assessment of the tank requirements of the new system, -$456k.

The design work for the Filter-Feed Tank submersible pumps has also been placed on hold and the procurement of the design will not be awarded at this time, -$169k. This scope will reside in the project's PMB until a BCR is implemented to remove the associated remaining BCWS. Until then, unfavorable schedule variances will continue to be realized. Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect.

SLIDE 69

January 2018 69

LAWPS CTD Variances

Schedule

5.5.4.2.1 P - LAWPS - Design - Project Support (PS) -$509k Cause: On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an

ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the previous LAWPS design. Following the External Expert Review, on November 16, 2017 WRPS received

Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the previous LAWPS

design. As a result, on November 29, 2017, WRPS terminated the subcontract previously established for Seismic Testing of the LAWPS Jumper Connectors, -$345k.

This scope will reside in the project's PMB until a BCR is implemented to remove the associated remaining BCWS. Until then, unfavorable schedule variances will continue to be realized. In addition, the CD-3A design package review and approval activity and IQRPE planning work has also been placed on hold as part of the replan, -$163k. Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect. Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. 5.5.6.2.1 P - LAWPS - Design Safety Analysis -$304k Cause: The CTD SV is due to Flammable Gas Hazard Analysis of LAWPS Piping and Vessels. The Procurement process experienced a delay in the award of the subcontract due to clarifying scope with the subcontractor prior to award. In addition, the initial analysis was performed with assumed gas volumes and max postulated pressures which provided overly conservative results. WRPS then calculated actual pressures and gas volumes and requested a re-run of the analysis, -$255k. Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect. Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned.

SLIDE 70

January 2018 70

LAWPS CTD Variances

Schedule

5.5.7.1.2 P - LAWPS - Tech Mature. Integrated Scale Test -$485k Cause: The CTD SV is due to delays in Gas Retention and Release Testing and AECOM 1/9 Scale Testing (-$438k). Commencement of the revised Gas Retention and Release Testing was initially delayed due to availability of vendor (PNNL) resources. Although testing has now started, the vendor is experiencing longer than anticipated durations due to the late start and continuing resource limitations (-$114k). AECOM CFF foulant testing activities have been placed on hold pending formal direction from DOE regarding the LAWPS re-scoping effort. This activity will contribute to the negative SV in this account until this work scope is removed from the baseline (-$323k). Impact: The PNNL and AECOM testing schedules do not currently have any CTD schedule impacts as the LAWPS design is progressing with preliminary data received from test results. Corrective Action: WRPS management will meet with the A/E responsible for the Preliminary Design to assess testing impacts from the GRS/Vented IX Column and

ther design changes. Once the impacts are determined, the project team will determine whether it is necessary to accelerate / recover schedule for the testing.

5.5.8.2.1 P - LAWPS - Design System Integration -$2,690k Cause: On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an

ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the previous LAWPS design. Following the External Expert Review, on November 16, 2017 WRPS received

Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the previous LAWPS

design. As a result, on November 20, 2017, WRPS issued a Stop Work Order to the Architect Engineer (A/E), requesting that they cease further progress of the

previous design. The current delay being experienced in this account is a direct result of the stop work; however, prior to the issuance of the stop work order the following drivers had contributed to the previous cumulative schedule variance, which are described below:

Delayed Process Engineering's progress of the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), Control and Alarm Set Point List, Design Basis Document, and two over
ne evaluations. Completion of the FMEA and the Control & Alarm Set Point lists have been re-sequenced in the current schedule to allow for the completion of

supporting documents which include the early publish of revision 2 P&IDs and HAZOP completion. Additionally, delayed progress of the development of the two over

ne evaluations are a result of additional time required to resolve issues with the seismic criteria of the facility and equipment.
Update to the current execution strategy by Instrumentation and Controls Engineering re-sequences the development and completion of the input/output (I/O) Lists,

Instrument Lists, Set Point Calculations, Instrument Uncertainty Analysis, and Control Logic Narratives to occur subsequent to the final publish of the revision 2 P&IDs, which is currently scheduled for early fiscal December. While the re-sequencing contributes to the overall CTD SV, the revised logic avoids the potential for future rework caused by differences between the P&IDs and design documents.

The extended effort around the Pipe Engineering's development of the Hydraulic Transient Analysis, which is due to unforeseen additional effort related to scope

growth and coordination meetings. Preparation of the associated calculations was planned for completion in latter part of fiscal August, per the current schedule, these tasks will now complete in fiscal November. The additional effort has slowed the progress of the calculations and contributes to the CTD SV.

Delayed progress of the A/E review of the P&IDs and PFDs. This delay is a result of the A/E's upfront extended effort to perform a more rigorous than planned

review of the P&IDs, in order to optimize the approach to the upcoming Inter-Disciplinary Review (IDR) of the process calculations and P&IDs.

SLIDE 71

January 2018 71

LAWPS CTD Variances

Schedule

Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect. Corrective Action: The project team is developing a revised plan in support of an optimized LAWPS design. As the delays associated with the previous LAWPS design do not impact the execution of the optimized LAWPS, the project intends to re-baseline the LAWPS schedule, which will include setting all cumulative BCWS equal to cumulative BCWP and holistically re-planning the remaining activities. The target date for implementation of the revised plan is March 23, 2018, which will allow for the plan to be finalized in February and subsequently reviewed, approved, and implemented in fiscal March via a baseline change request (BCR). 5.5.8.2.3 P - LAWPS - Design Primary Pretreat System -$577k Cause: On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an

ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the previous LAWPS design. Following the External Expert Review, on November 16, 2017 WRPS received

Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the previous LAWPS

design. As a result, on November 20, 2017, WRPS issued a Stop Work Order to the Architect Engineer (A/E), requesting that they cease further progress of the

previous design. The current delay being experienced in this account is a direct result of the stop work. Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect. Corrective Action: The project team is developing a revised plan in support of an optimized LAWPS design. As the delays associated with the previous LAWPS design do not impact the execution of the optimized LAWPS, the project intends to re-baseline the LAWPS schedule, which will include setting all cumulative BCWS equal to cumulative BCWP and holistically re-planning the remaining activities. The target date for implementation of the revised plan is March 23, 2018, which will allow for the plan to be finalized in February and subsequently reviewed, approved, and implemented in fiscal March via a baseline change request (BCR).

SLIDE 72

January 2018 72

LAWPS CTD Variances

Schedule

5.5.8.2.6 P - LAWPS - Design Balance of Plant System -$1,386k Cause: On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an

ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the previous LAWPS design. Following the External Expert Review, on November 16, 2017 WRPS received

Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the previous LAWPS

design. As a result, on November 20, 2017, WRPS issued a Stop Work Order to the Architect Engineer (A/E), requesting that they cease further progress of the

previous design. The current delay being experienced in this account is a direct result of the stop work; however, prior to the issuance of the stop work order the following drivers had contributed to the previous cumulative schedule variance, which are described below:

In June of fiscal year 2017, an imminent change to the current design was recognized based on results of the project's integrated testing. The Integrated Project

Team made the decision that the current design related to the Gas Removal System (GRS) would be replaced with Vented Ion Exchange Columns (VIXC) and additionally incorporate other essential changes required for 90% design completion. Following this decision, the project team identified urgent tasks to be performed in support of the design changes and implemented the associated scope, schedule, and budget into the PMB via BCR RPP-17-159 - LAWPS Implementation of Stage 1 GRS to Vented IX Design. Amongst these urgent tasks was the effort to revise the Balance of Plant (BOP) 3D model, which allowed the A/E to commence work while the balance of the revised execution strategy was developed. As the execution strategy matured it was evident that revisions to the BOP 3D model would require additional effort. This revised strategy has now been fully implemented via BCR RPP-17-171 - LAWPS GRS to VIXC and Essential Changes for 90% (Phase 2) and the current schedule now reflects the appropriate durations and inputs required to complete the extended effort to revise the BOP 3D Model.

Delays to Electrical Engineering drawings as a result of the incorporation of changes from the revision 2a P&IDs. The P&IDs drive the Input/output (I/O) lists, which

are required to complete the wiring diagrams and schematics

The preparation of the Safety Integrity Level (SIL) Calculations, and Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) were re-sequenced in the current schedule to

incorporate impacts for revision 8 of specification 58553 and to include updates associated with the afore mention revised execution strategy Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect. Corrective Action: The project team is developing a revised plan in support of an optimized LAWPS design. As the delays associated with the previous LAWPS design do not impact the execution of the optimized LAWPS, the project intends to re-baseline the LAWPS schedule, which will include setting all cumulative BCWS equal to cumulative BCWP and holistically re-planning the remaining activities. The target date for implementation of the revised plan is March 23, 2018, which will allow for the plan to be finalized in February and subsequently reviewed, approved, and implemented in fiscal March via a baseline change request (BCR).

SLIDE 73

January 2018 73

LAWPS CTD Variances

Schedule

5.5.8.2.7 P - LAWPS - Design Facilities System -$2,063k Cause: On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an

ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the previous LAWPS design. Following the External Expert Review, on November 16, 2017 WRPS received

Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the previous LAWPS

design. As a result, on November 20, 2017, WRPS issued a Stop Work Order to the Architect Engineer (A/E), requesting that they cease further progress of the

previous design. The current delay being experienced in this account is a direct result of the stop work; however, prior to the issuance of the stop work order the following drivers had contributed to the previous cumulative schedule variance, which are described below:

Activities supporting the Earth Retaining System (ERS) were placed on hold as intermediate design changes are vetted to avoid unnecessary rework around the
ERS. In the interim, the associated delay contributes to the CTD SV.
Structural Engineering's effort to prepare calculations for Ventilation Stack, Backup Exhauster, De-ionized Water Foundations, and Reagent Tank Access Platform

has been extended. The extended duration of these tasks is attributed to waiting for building layout to be finalized, resource availability, and necessary design inputs. The extended duration has delayed the start of downstream checking and review activities as well as related drawings, which all contribute to the CTD SV.

In June of fiscal year 2017, an imminent change to the current design was recognized based on results of the project's integrated testing. The Integrated Project

Team made the decision that the current design related to the Gas Removal System (GRS) would be replaced with Vented Ion Exchange Columns (VIXC) and additionally incorporate other essential changes required for 90% design completion. Following this decision, the project team identified urgent tasks to be performed in support of the design changes and implemented the associated scope, schedule, and budget into the PMB via BCR RPP-17-159 - LAWPS Implementation of Stage 1 GRS to Vented IX Design. Amongst these urgent tasks was the effort to prepare the Facilities Balance of Plant (BOP) and Primary Pretreatment System (PPS) 3D model, which allowed the A/E to commence work while the balance of the revised execution strategy was developed. As the execution strategy matured it was evident that the effort to revise the BOP and PPS 3D model would require additional time. This revised strategy has now been fully implemented via BCR RPP- 17-171 - LAWPS GRS to VIXC and Essential Changes for 90% (Phase 2) and the current schedule now reflects the appropriate durations and inputs required to complete the extended effort to revise the BOP and PPS 3D Model.

Changes to the execution strategy of the weather enclosure, design vault, and miscellaneous steel activities are a result of the incorporation of the A/E's structural

subcontractor scope responsible for the Soil-Structure Interaction (SSI) initial model run and corresponding data extract. The receipt of the data was worked into the current schedule, which resulted in delays to downstream activities related to Weather Enclosure Calculations, Lag Storage Calculations/Drawings, and Design Vault Calculations. Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect. Corrective Action: The project team is developing a revised plan in support of an optimized LAWPS design. As the delays associated with the previous LAWPS design do not impact the execution of the optimized LAWPS, the project intends to re-baseline the LAWPS schedule, which will include setting all cumulative BCWS equal to cumulative BCWP and holistically re-planning the remaining activities. The target date for implementation of the revised plan is March 23, 2018, which will allow for the plan to be finalized in February and subsequently reviewed, approved, and implemented in fiscal March via a baseline change request (BCR).

SLIDE 74

January 2018 74

LAWPS CTD Variances

Schedule

5.5.8.2.8 P - LAWPS - Design Project Management & Support -$1,465k Cause: On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an

ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the previous LAWPS design. Following the External Expert Review, on November 16, 2017 WRPS received

Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the previous LAWPS

design. As a result, on November 20, 2017, WRPS issued a Stop Work Order to the Architect Engineer (A/E), requesting that they cease further progress of the

previous design. The current delay being experienced in this account is a direct result of the stop work. Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect. Corrective Action: The project team is developing a revised plan in support of an optimized LAWPS design. As the delays associated with the previous LAWPS design do not impact the execution of the optimized LAWPS, the project intends to re-baseline the LAWPS schedule, which will include setting all cumulative BCWS equal to cumulative BCWP and holistically re-planning the remaining activities. The target date for implementation of the revised plan is March 23, 2018, which will allow for the plan to be finalized in February and subsequently reviewed, approved, and implemented in fiscal March via a baseline change request (BCR). 5.5.8.2.9 P - LAWPS - Build to Print -$590k Cause: On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an

ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the previous LAWPS design. Following the External Expert Review, on November 16, 2017 WRPS received

Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the previous LAWPS

design. As a result, on November 20, 2017, WRPS issued a Stop Work Order to the Architect Engineer (A/E), requesting that they cease further progress of the

previous design. The current delay being experienced in this account is a direct result of the stop work; however, prior to the issuance of the stop work order the following driver had contributed to the previous cumulative schedule variance, which is described below:

The majority of Build to Print (BTP) work scope was put on hold while the re-plan associated with the change from the Gas Removal System (GRS) to the Vented Ion

Exchange (VIXC) was planned and implemented. The current BTP plan needed to be re-worked to allow for incorporation of the associated changes and other imminent design changes. As a result, progress was limited on the activities identified as being affected by the changes. Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect. Corrective Action: The project team is developing a revised plan in support of an optimized LAWPS design. As the delays associated with the previous LAWPS design do not impact the execution of the optimized LAWPS, the project intends to re-baseline the LAWPS schedule, which will include setting all cumulative BCWS equal to cumulative BCWP and holistically re-planning the remaining activities. The target date for implementation of the revised plan is March 23, 2018, which will allow for the plan to be finalized in February and subsequently reviewed, approved, and implemented in fiscal March via a baseline change request (BCR).

SLIDE 75

January 2018 75

LAWPS CTD Variances

Schedule

5.5.11.2.1 P - LAWPS - Long Lead Procurements Design -$998k Cause: On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an

ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the previous LAWPS design. Following the External Expert Review, on November 16, 2017 WRPS received

Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the previous LAWPS

design. As a result, the final design package for the ASME tanks has been placed on hold pending an assessment of the tank requirements of the new system, -$456k.

Similar to the ASME Tanks, the Xomox valve design final package will no longer be required and has been placed on hold, -$400k. The design work for the Filter-Feed Tank submersible pumps has also been placed on hold and the procurement for the design of the pumps will not be awarded at this time, -$169k. This scope will reside in the project's PMB until a BCR is implemented to remove the associated remaining BCWS. Until then, unfavorable schedule variances will continue to be realized. Impact: The project team is in the planning stages of an optimized LAWPS design. It is anticipated that the current remaining baseline activities will be replaced by a revised plan. In the interim, schedule variances will continue to be realized as the Stop Work remains in effect. Corrective Action: The project team is developing a revised plan in support of an optimized LAWPS design. As the delays associated with the previous LAWPS design do not impact the execution of the optimized LAWPS, the project intends to re-baseline the LAWPS schedule, which will include setting all cumulative BCWS equal to cumulative BCWP and holistically re-planning the remaining activities. The target date for implementation of the revised plan is March 23, 2018, which will allow for the plan to be finalized in February and subsequently reviewed, approved, and implemented in fiscal March via a baseline change request (BCR).

SLIDE 76

76

LAWPS CTD Variances

January 2018

Cost

5.5.3.2.1 P - LAWPS - Design Project Management (PM) -$562k Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to:

Labor rates. The actual average hourly rates experienced for all labor resources exceeds the hourly rate used for planning/estimating the work scope by

approximately $10/hr, -$461k.

Labor usage. The actual hours experienced to date are greater than the realized calendar hours used to plan/estimate the work. These resources have not taken

paid time off consistent with the planned allocation allowance used to calculate the annual realized hours (actual hours experienced are 674 hours greater than planned), -$64k. Impact: There is no impact to any other activities or accounts outside of this account. Corrective Action: No corrective action is planned at this time. 5.5.4.2.1 P - LAWPS - Design - Project Support (PS) -$2,679k Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to:

Labor usage. Additional resources have been retained to increase the quality and completeness of the preliminary design as the project progresses towards
construction. In addition, the personnel performing the work are senior level individuals and were assigned to the project based on their experience and knowledge.

These resources have not taken paid time off consistent with the planned allowance used to calculate the annual realized hours. The number of actual hours experienced is greater than the hours utilized for planning the work scope by approximately 13,853 hours, -$1,515k.

Labor rates. The actual average hourly rates experienced for all labor resources exceeds the hourly rate used for planning/estimating the work scope by

approximately $6/hr, -$654k. Impact: There is no impact to any other activities or accounts outside of this account. Corrective Action: No corrective action is planned at this time.

SLIDE 77

77

LAWPS CTD Variances

January 2018

Cost

5.5.5.1.1 E - LAWPS - Permitting Dev., Prep & Reviews $357k Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to utilizing fewer labor resources than planned. To date 12,131 hours have been earned in support of permitting activities and 7,137 actual hours have been charged, resulting in a positive CV of 4,994 hours. Preparation of draft permitting documentation has gone smoother than originally anticipated, and existing permitting staff have been able to perform the work scope in an efficient manner and avoiding the need to retain additional staffing resources

riginally projected to be needed, $307k.

Impact: There is no impact to any other activities or accounts outside of this account. Corrective Action: The variance is favorable and does not require any corrective actions at this time. 5.5.6.2.1 P - LAWPS - Design Safety Analysis -$282k Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to:

Flammable Gas Hazard Analysis of LAWPS Piping and Vessels. The Procurement process experienced a delay in the award of the subcontract due to clarifying

scope with the subcontractor prior to award. In addition, the initial analysis was performed with assumed gas volumes and max postulated pressures which provided

verly conservative results. WRPS then calculated actual pressures and gas volumes and requested a re-run of the analysis, -$153k.
Labor rates. The actual average hourly rates experienced for all labor resources exceeds the hourly rate used for planning/estimating the work scope by

approximately $15/hr, -$176k.

Labor usage. The CTD CV is partially offset by labor and Staff Aug resource usage to support performance of Safety Analysis activities. Initially, Staff Aug resources

were planned to perform a significant portion of the safety activities. However, it was subsequently determined that the direct safety labor resources, with historical knowledge and experience of the project, would perform these activities, $73k. Impact: There is no impact to any other activities or accounts outside of this account. Corrective Action: No corrective action is planned at this time.

SLIDE 78

78

LAWPS CTD Variances

January 2018

Cost

5.5.7.1.1 P - LAWPS - Tech Maturation Program & Misc Tests $350k Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to:

To date, the engineering support required to oversee performance of subcontracted national laboratory support has been less than planned. The national

laboratories (SRNL and PNNL) have extensive historical knowledge and experience with the subcontracted work scope and the WRPS Technology Maturation personnel, which allows them to perform the work scope efficiently with reduced oversight, $142k.

In comparison to the original plan for the sRF-3 testing and the final subcontract award, the engineering design was further developed and refined. This resulted in

some experienced efficiencies during the testing phase, $183k. There is no change to the variance drivers from the prior reporting period. Impact: There is no impact to any other activities or accounts outside of this account. Corrective Action: The variance is favorable and does not require any corrective actions at this time. 5.5.7.1.2 P - LAWPS - Tech Mature. Integrated Scale Test $477k Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to:

The account is experiencing labor price/usage efficiencies. Originally, staffing levels were assumed and planned at a higher level to provide oversight and support to

the Integrated Engineering-Scale test. Project Manager and Project Controls support were planned under this account. However, this support has been provided by resources already assigned to the project under the Project Management account. Also, the actual hourly rate experienced in this account for engineering support/oversight is less than the planning rate by approximately $16/Hr, $775k.

The actual cost for resin procurements was significantly less than planned. Originally, resin was planned to be procured in two batches. The quantity of required

resin required was reduced to 500 gallons based on the refined needs of the project, $490k.

National Laboratory Technology Maturation program testing and oversight has experienced a negative cost variance that was driven by revisions to the test plan.

The biggest impact was caused by a change in the design to eliminate the Hydrogen Diffusion Design Feature (HDDF) and provide a standby, on demand, vessel ventilation for flammable gas mitigation, -$923k. Impact: There is no impact to any other activities or accounts outside of this account. Corrective Action: The variance is favorable and does not require any corrective actions at this time.

SLIDE 79

79

LAWPS CTD Variances

January 2018

Cost

5.5.8.2.3 P - LAWPS - Design Primary Pretreat System -$1,552k Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to:

To date the modeling effort required more resources than planned. This is attributed to the extensive comment incorporation from the 30% design reviews as well as

the preparation of story boards and a model fly through, which was unplanned. The model was matured to higher level of detail than planned and prepared to be free from clashes, in support of the accelerated 60% design requirements. Additionally, options for above grade maintenance access for the lag storage tanks and pipe routing changes around the Lag Storage area were required to satisfy facility construction requirements.

Studies/Calculations variance is due to pipe stress and process engineering requiring more effort because of the inefficiencies associated with concurrent

development of P&IDs, mechanical design, and piping design. Further variance in pipe stress was caused by the effort required to develop pipe stress design basis criteria for safety related systems (including seismic requirements and PUREX nozzle qualifications including TFC-ENG-DESIGN-C-60 requirements). Additional hours were spent developing a rationale presentation to WRPS for design justification for backpressure requirements for the filtration calculations, which was not included in the original estimate. The lag storage calcs required additional effort beyond what was estimated due to specification changes that were made after completion of advanced conceptual design. Process equipment calculations for mechanical design and piping were inefficient due to multiple iterations required to complete the 30% Delta Design Review package.

The Ion Exchange (IX) and Cross-Flow Filter (CFF) packages required additional hours to advance beyond what was planned. Drawing activities were performed to

support the 30% delta review packages and the completion of the long lead procurement packages that are required to meet the September 2016 PBI milestone. Additional unplanned hours to perform these activities were incurred to ensure the milestone date would be met. In addition, a greater than planned effort was required to provide the drawings necessary to present the high level of detail that is going to be included in the 60% package (300+ mechanical drawings). Additional resources were required to ensure the 60% part A completion date was achieved and IDR comments had to be addressed as they were received rather than on complete closure of the IDR cycle. Impact: On November 16, 2017 WRPS received Letter 17-TF-0096 - CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 - Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, providing formal direction from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) to de-scope items associated with the current LAWPS design. As a result, on November 20, 2017, WRPS issued a Stop Work Order to the Architect Engineer (A/E), requesting that they cease further progress of the current design. This account will not be impacted by further charges. Corrective Action: The variance is not recoverable and is reflected in the EAC.

SLIDE 80

80

LAWPS CTD Variances

January 2018

Cost

5.5.8.2.6 P - LAWPS - Design Balance of Plant System -$1,639k Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to:

Electrical specification, drawing, and modeling efforts have been accelerated to support the project schedule. The effort for specification development has been

impacted by the iterative process required on the procurement and quality sections of the specifications. Additional unplanned effort to complete electrical drawings has been realized as a result of new design requirements and the need for more design drawings. Additionally, the Electrical Engineering effort for the Hazardous Area Classification required more effort than planned to address review comments and different base assumptions.

On October 23, 2017 the External Expert Review of the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) Project document was released, which endorsed an
ptimized LAWPS facility that would vary significantly from the current LAWPS design. As a result, progress on the current design was slowed and on November 20,

2017 a Stop Work Order was issued to the Architect Engineer directing them to cease work on all current design in accordance with Letter 17-TF-0096 – CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 – Direction to Suspend Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, received from U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) on November 16, 2017. The majority of the inefficiencies in the current period were due to the slowdown of design activity, and the A/E not being able to ramp down staff as quickly as the work slowed. This was due to both WRPS and the A/E knowing the stop work was forthcoming, but officially not received until later in the month. WRPS worked with ORP and the A/E to stop the work as quickly as possible, it was a detailed process and significant considerations needed to be worked through. This took some time to ensure it was communicated appropriately, thus the costs continued until the official notice was delivered.

The BOP Controls Specs, Control System Spec, Safety System Spec, and developing the CSI spec format and requirements have been impacted by the redefinition
f the quality requirements. This change in formatting has caused unplanned specification rework to meet the new format requirements.
Development of the SIL/FMEA calculations contributes to the unfavorable cost variance. Several activities have required effort beyond what was initially planned

because more complex analysis has been required. In addition, higher costs have been realized due to additional resource ramping up and increased effort to perform the work. The original estimate was for 6 Safety Integration Functions (SIFs), and through the development of the design, there are now 19 SIFs that are factored into the calculations requiring more time and effort to complete.

Control drawings have been revised multiple times and continue to be updated. Control cabinet and room layouts have been revised to address additional space

requirements for elevated I/O counts. Impact: No further impact is expected since the stop work order has been issued. Corrective Action: A Stop Work Order was issued to the A/E on November 20, 2017, stopping all further charges to this control account. The project team is now developing a revised plan in support of the optimized LAWPS design. Phases of the revised plan have been approved and implemented to allow for urgent work to progress under a new WBS structure (5.05.25). Subsequent BCRs will be used to implement the remaining scope, schedule, and budget and replace the existing remaining baseline activities. The majority of the revised plan is targeted for implementation by the end of fiscal March 2018.

SLIDE 81

81

LAWPS CTD Variances

January 2018

Cost

5.5.8.2.7 P - LAWPS - Design Facilities System -$3,252k Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to:

Weather Enclosure Structural calculations and seismic analysis (SSI) activities performed by subcontractor SGH, Vault Concrete calculations, Vault Steel

calculations, and Cell Cover calculations started late due to contract negotiations that resulted in cost and schedule impacts caused by the tightly compressed

schedule. The subcontract award to SGH was significantly higher than the A/E baseline estimate for the work scope. Additionally, vault steel, vault cover, and vault

concrete calculations all went through multiple iterations as equipment arrangements matured and ensure alignment with the concrete substructure.

Additional effort for Architectural drawings has been required due the significant coordination required with the other engineering disciplines and with SGH, as their

designs have matured and changes are needed to the architectural model and drawings.

Architectural specifications for the Weather Enclosure involved a larger number of specs than originally anticipated and the Change Facility experienced significant

changes due to requests made during the WRPS design reviews to accommodate operational and radiation protection needs.

3D modeling activities went through a number of iterations in order to synchronize the SGH model with the A/E structural vault model and the integrated A/E Smart

Plant model.

Additional effort for Structural drawings has been required due to the need to align the initial vault designs with the SGH design of the upper weather enclosure

structures and to perform the weather enclosure structure drawings. Impact: No further impact is expected since the stop work order has been issued. Corrective Action: A Stop Work Order was issued to the A/E on November 20, 2017, stopping all further charges to this control account. The project team is now developing a revised plan in support of the optimized LAWPS design. Phases of the revised plan have been approved and implemented to allow for urgent work to progress under a new WBS structure (5.05.25). Subsequent BCRs will be used to implement the remaining scope, schedule, and budget and replace the existing remaining baseline activities. The majority of the revised plan is targeted for implementation by the end of fiscal March 2018.

SLIDE 82

82

LAWPS CTD Variances

January 2018

Cost

5.5.8.2.8 P - LAWPS - Design Project Management & Support -$362k Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to the effort for the Architect Engineer (A/E) to deliver all completed and partially completed work products following the stop work

rder issued to the A/E on November 20, 2017. The stop work order followed Letter 17-TF-0096 – CONTRACT NUMBER DE-AC27-08RV14800 – Direction to Suspend

Selected Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System Design and Testing Activities, received from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP)

n November 16, 2017. The effort to deliver all completed and partially completed work products, is unbudgeted and therefore all associated cost contributes to the

current month’s unfavorable variance, -$820k. This variance is somewhat offset by a favorable variance achieved in the A/E's Project Management and Support of the previous LAWPS design where their management and project support functions were able to effectively engage their teams utilizing less resources than planned, $332k. The unfavorable variance is additionally offset by the more recent effort to support planning and setup associated with an optimized LAWPS design, $126k. This can be attributed to the A/E’s ability to support this effort with limited resources. Impact: The control account is forecasted to be overspent; however, costs associated with the effort to deliver all completed or partially completed work products is to be included in Contract Change Proposal 18-007 and the budgeted value of the control account will ultimately be increased by the value negotiated for this effort. Corrective Action: As part of the Letter 17-TF-0096, WRPS was requested to provide a contract change proposal. The effort to develop contract change proposal 18- 007 is underway and is currently due by March 02, 2018. The effort associated with the delivery of all completed or partially completed work products is to be captured in this proposal and later negotiated.

SLIDE 83

83

LAWPS Challenges/Issues/Opportunities

January 2018

Challenges

Integration of LAWPS with TSCR and AP Farm Upgrades work scope.

Issues

WDOE continues to desire that the HVAC system be included in the RCRA Permit and

tank vapor abatement be deployed which could lead to significant design changes. Opportunities

None at this time.

SLIDE 84

84

LAWPS Contract Changes / BCR Log

January 2018

Contract Changes Assigned Date Tech Lead Target Completion Estimated Impact ($M) Current Status

DOE-EM Review CP-17-033 18-Sep-17

C. Burke

Complete $0.2M

Proposal will be combined with CP-18-007 in February per e-

mail direction from ORP Contracting Officer. LAWPS RFP CP-18-007 11-Nov-17

C. Burke

TBD $19.0M

Actual costs and NTE value from CP-17-008 and CP-17-031

have been moved to this proposal per ORP.

RPP-18-030 implemented one month of budget to cover A/E

efforts for planning & project setup.

RPP-18-045 implemented another month of budget to cover

A/E efforts for planning & project setup.

RPP-18-061 will add WRPS PM/PS support, Tech Mat planning,

and Preliminary Design activities.

BCR#/Description Level CAM Target Completion Estimated Impact Current Status

RPP-18-061: Optimized LAWPS Project Re-planning (Phase 3) 2 Jeff Filip Tom Sackett January 2018 $7,421k BCR approved but won’t be implemented until February reporting. RPP-18-084: FY 2018 Performance Based Incentive Milestone Revision per Contract Mod 464 2 Jeff Filip Tom Sackett February 2018 $0k BCR to be processed and implemented for February reporting.

Contract Changes / NTE Status BCR Status

SLIDE 85

Chief Technology Office & Closure January 2018

Alternate Retrieval End Effector Fabrication Testing DFLAW Radioactive Waste Test Platform LAWPS Engineering-Scale Integrated Test Platform ILAW Glass Samples

SLIDE 86

86

Chief Technology Office & Closure Overview

January 2018

SLIDE 87

87

Chief Technology Office & Closure Schedule Recovery

January 2018

Cumulative to Date SV Forecast

SLIDE 88

88

Chief Technology Office & Closure Major Current Month Variances

January 2018

Cost

5.02.04.02.06 Integrated Disposal Facility Perf Assessment $168k

Cause: The CM CV is primarily due to planned subcontract support during the Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group (LFRG)
review. Four subcontractors were originally planned to provide Subject Matter Expert support during the LFRG review (Intera, PNNL, SRNL, and

SRR). However, over the course of the review, the majority of the questions pertained to work performed by Intera. Little to no support was required during the review by PNNL, SRNL, and SRR resulting in cost efficiencies for the planned support. The LFRG review completed in the current reporting period.

Impact: There is no impact to any other baseline activities outside of this account.

5.03.12.02.02 Technology Maturation & Analysis $131k

Cause: The CM CV is primarily due to resource usage efficiencies in the Technology Maturation and Analysis level of effort (LOE) account. Less

management oversight/support has been required than was originally planned. The efficiencies are a result of the following: 1) the senior project management position has been filled by a staff member already on-board, while the other project manager position has been supported in the interim by another staff member also already on-board. 2) The SRNL technical support resource is currently supporting the work scope under an Approved Funding Program (AFP). Under an AFP, the funding is transferred to SRNL via DOE. AFP costs are not processed through the TOC financial

systems. However, the performance for the associated work scope is reported, resulting in a favorable cost variance.
Impact: There is no impact as a result of the CM CV.

5.03.06.01.04 IDF Glass Testing $130k

Cause: The CM CV is primarily due to Stage III test instructions and Lysimeter modeling. The Stage III test instructions were completed by the

National Laboratory (PNNL) subcontractor with fewer resources than originally planned. PNNL performed the Stage I and II testing and extensive technical and historical knowledge for this particular scope. The pre-experimental Lysimeter modeling was not as complex as anticipated, and was completed early, resulting in fewer resources required to complete the modeling scope.

Impact: The control account is forecasted to be underspent upon completion of the work scope.

SLIDE 89

89

Chief Technology Office & Closure Major Current Month Variances

January 2018

Schedule

5.03.01.07.03 Waste Feed Delivery Technology -$363k

Cause: The CM SV is primarily due to the 1) Mechanical Waste Gathering system (MWGS): Atkins is performing in-house proof of principle testing on

the MWGS. The duration of this testing is longer than originally anticipated. The extended testing duration has resulted in a delay in the start of design activities. 2) Additionally, the NDE Functions and Requirements document was more complicated and took longer than planned. This resulted in delays to the start of the Sensor fabrication and instrument testing, and the awards of second-tier subcontracts to WSU, Guided Wave, and Innerspec for sensor maturation testing. 3) The start of the On-line Monitoring activities were delayed to perform an evaluation of ORP/WTP’s On-Line program to ensure there was not a duplication in testing.

Impact: No impact to any other activities outside this account.

5.03.12.02.04 Solid Secondary Waste Stream Tech Mat (DFLAW) -$133k

Cause: The CM SV is due to DFLAW Solid Secondary Waste Phase 3 testing. Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) was performing the

DFLAW Solid Secondary Waste testing. An agreement on the contracting method/procurement process for Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) could not be reached. This resulted in the delay of starting the Phase 3 testing. The work scope will be awarded to another National Laboratory.

Impact: No impact to critical path or other control accounts.

SLIDE 90

90

Chief Technology Office & Closure Major Contract to Date Variances

January 2018

Cost

5.03.12.02.01 Technology Development $3,177k  Cause: The CTD CV is due to the following: 1) Labor usage efficiencies in FY 14. At the beginning of FY 14, a significant portion of scope was not

authorized. As a result, labor resources were redirected to other project accounts. In Jun 14, the afore-mentioned scope was authorized and

implemented into the baseline. However, the reinstatement of staff to the project was slower than expected due to completion of reassigned work. 2) SRNL actual costs under Inter Entity Work Order (IEWO) contracts were not processed through TOC financial systems, which resulted in a favorable cost variance. 3) Labor usage efficiencies experienced in FY 15 in the LOE account for Technology Development and Program Management. 4) PNNL subcontract labor usage and price efficiencies under the Low Temperature Waste Form account were realized in FY 15. This is a result of their historic knowledge and expertise of the work scope.  Impact: No impact to the project. The SRNL IEWO contracts (IEWO = BCWS, BCWP without ACWP) will cause a final positive CTD variance.  Corrective Action: There is no corrective action planned. The favorable CTD CV is due to efficiencies realized in previous fiscal years. 5.02.04.02.03 RCRA Closure Plan Updates $2,186k  Cause: The CTD CV is due to labor & subcontractor resource efficiencies. Internal subject matter experts were used, instead of additional subcontractor support, to develop the TPA Closure Plans (Tier 1, 2, & 3), WIR, and DOE 435.1 Closure Plan. Realignment of internal resources supporting multiple activities within the organization resulted in labor utilization efficiencies. Also, comments received from ORP required fewer document revisions than planned.  Impact: Using internal subject matter expert support has resulted in an overall cost savings for the TPA Tier 1, 2, and 3 Closure Plans, WIR development, and DOE 435.1 Closure Plan development. Cost efficiencies have been accounted for in the EAC.  Corrective Action: No corrective action. Variance is favorable. 5.03.06.01.04 IDF Glass Testing $2,075k  Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to the following: 1) Subcontract resources provided by Pacific Northwest National Lab (PNNL) experienced usage efficiencies due to their historical knowledge and expertise of the IDF Glass Testing Program, FYs 14 - 16, and FY 17. 2) WRPS labor resource usage in FY 14 was less than the planned baseline for oversight/management of the IDF Glass Testing Program. This efficiency is attributed to the labor resources and confidence in subcontractor's historical knowledge and expertise of the work scope, which required less oversight/management.  Impact: There is no impact to any other activities outside of this account.  Corrective Action: There is no corrective action planned. CTD CV is favorable and a result of previous fiscal year efficiencies. 5.03.12.02.02 Technology Maturation & Analysis $2,074k  Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due the following: 1) Labor usage efficiencies have been realized in the Technology Maturation & Analysis LOE account, as there has been less management oversight/support required than what was originally planned. This is primarily due to a senior project manager being moved to another project in mid-Fiscal Year (FY) 16, the attrition of project manager in mid-FY 17, and the attrition of a senior engineer mid-year FY 16. The responsibilities for the senior project manager and the senior engineer have been filled by existing resources. The other project manager position has been supported in the interim by another staff member also already on-board. 2) Resource usage efficiencies related to the subcontract support for external reviews and technical support in the Technology Maturation & Analysis LOE account. To date, there has been less subcontract support required than originally planned.  Impact: There is no impact to any other activities outside of this account.  Corrective Action: There is no corrective action planned. 5.03.01.07.03 Waste Feed Delivery Technology $1,882k  Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to the following: 1) FY 17 cost efficiencies realized in the preparation for Hanford Waste End Effector (HWEE) Testing, and Under Double-Shell Tank (DST) Non-Visual Inspection Effectiveness Testing. The definition phase of both projects was performed with significantly less resources than originally planned as the project team has been able to leverage existing data to its advantage for the Simulant and End Effector design. Additionally, PNNL and WRPS were able to effectively engage their team and contributing counterparts in preparing for both

tests. 2) Subcontract technical support of emerging engineering studies, under WFD Technology Solutions. This is a level of effort activity and required

less support than planned in FY 14 and FY 15. 3) The subcontract work performed by EnergySolutions for the Small-Scale Solids Delivery Testing, which started in FY 2014 and completed in the 4th quarter of FY 15, experienced cost efficiencies due to its labor pricing and usage being less than

SLIDE 91

91

Chief Technology Office & Closure Major Contract to Date Variances

January 2018

Cost (cont.)

5.03.01.07.05 WFD System Performance $1,396k  Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to labor usage and price efficiencies in subcontract resources and labor. 1) The subcontract work for the Isolok Reference Sampler Testing, which began in FY 14 and completed in the third quarter of FY 15, experienced efficiencies due to subcontractor labor rates and actual usage being less than originally assumed in the baseline. Also, less subcontract oversight was required due to the experience of the subcontracted resources. 2) Fewer labor resources were used than what was planned in support of the Feed Delivery Technical Issue Resolution in FY 2014.  Impact: There is no impact to any other activities outside of this account.  Corrective Action: There is no corrective action planned. The favorable CTD CV is due to efficiencies realized in previous fiscal years. 5.03.10.03.02 Secondary Waste Form Development $1,290k  Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to resource usage and price efficiencies realized by the National Laboratories subcontracted to perform this

scope. 1) The work being performed by SRNL in support of the Waste Form Development of Fresh Properties has experienced resource usage

efficiencies in the work performed to date and the project expects that this trend will continue with their remaining work. The contract was awarded to SRNL for significantly less than what was originally estimated and to date, they have been able to execute the scope within the funds awarded and they do not expect to exceed this. 2) PNNL experienced resource usage and price efficiencies in FY 14. This is attributed to the fact that PNNL has worked extensively in the past on similar work scope and was able to engage efficiently to support this effort. 3) The National Labs (PNNL & SRNL) contracted to support Secondary Waste Form Development in FY 15 also experienced resource usage and price efficiencies, again due to the fact that the national labs have worked extensively in the past on similar work scope and were able to engage efficiently to support this effort.  Impact: There is no impact to any other activities outside of this account.  Corrective Action: There is no corrective action planned. The favorable CTD CV is due to efficiencies realized in previous fiscal years. 5.02.04.01.01 Closure Program Management $1,027k  Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to labor efficiencies. In prior fiscal years, this level of effort account experienced vacancies in technical personnel, both direct and staff aug positions. The scope outside of this account was designated as high priority. Resources planned under this account were diverted to support the higher priority work scope.  Impact: There are no impacts to baseline activities outside of this control account.  Corrective Action: No corrective actions. This is a favorable variance. 5.02.04.02.07 Waste Magt Area C Performance Assessments -$629k  Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to the FY16 additional direct and subcontract labor support required to complete an additional Exposure Scenario Document and three additional environmental model calculation files (EMCF) in preparation for the WMA C PA review by the Low Level Waste Federal Review Group (LFRG). Additionally, direct labor and subcontractor technical support was necessary to address review comments in updates to the WMA C PA documentation in FY16. The modeling estimates were based on the Savannah River Site modeling effort. The Hanford site modeling effort is proving to be much more difficult technically, requiring increased modeling and documentation to complete the scope.  Impact: The additional modeling documentation and review and comment resolution support for completion of WMA C PA related activities in FY16 continue to have impacts on CTD in FY17. The EAC has been updated and additional variances are being tracked for activities that were currently in progress.  Corrective Action: There are no corrective actions planned. The variance is not recoverable and is reflected in the EAC.

SLIDE 92

92

Chief Technology Office & Closure Major Contract to Date Variances

January 2018

Schedule

5.02.01.04.01 Vadose Zone Mgmt & Regulatory Docs -$1,207k  Cause: The CTD SV is primarily due to delays in receiving Ecology's comments on the RFI and CMS documents. The RFI and CMS documents were submitted to Ecology in DEC 16, and comments were expected the week of FEB 15, 17. However, Ecology has not returned comments on these two

documents. Ecology submitted a letter (17-NWP-058) to ORP on MAY 22, 17 requesting an extension for completing its review and final comments on

WMA C documents (RCRA Closure Analysis of WMA C, PA of WMA C, Analysis of Past Tank Waste Leaks and Losses, and BRA for WMA C) by JUL 16, 17. Ecology has requested several extensions (via letter transmittals) to complete its review. The latest letter received in DEC 17 anticipated a completed review by JAN 16, 18. However, comments were not received in January. Until Ecology completes its review and comments of these documents, it can't start its review and comments of the RFI/CMS. Ecology will address the RFI/CMS documents after completion of WMA C document reviews.  Impact: The SV is expected to continue until comments are received from Ecology on the RFI and CMS documents. Despite the delays, WRPS will still be able to respond to the comments and update the reports in order to meet the TPA milestone (M-045-62: Submit Phase 2 Corrective Measures Implementation Work Plan for WMA C) by its due date. However, work on the CMIP cannot proceed as planned and was re-planned. A modification to the baseline activities was implemented under BCR RPP-17-134, which better aligned the CMIP activities with the official proposed Milestone finish date of AUG 31, 28 (17-TF-0046).  Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. 5.02.04.02.07 Waste Mgt Area C Performance Assessments -$886k  Cause: The CTD SV is primarily due to (1) a delay in receiving comments from Ecology on WMA C documents - Past Leaks Analysis, Baseline Risk Assessment, RCRA Closure Analysis, and (2) a delay in initiating NRC review of the WMA C PA as planned/scheduled. This NRC review of the WMA C PA is linked to the NRC review of the WMA C WIR being done under WBS 5.2.4.2.3.2 (DOE 435.1 Closure Plans). The WIR was transmitted to DOE-HQ for review by the Office of General Council in JUL 17. The time required for review and approval by the Office of General Council at DOE- HQ to submit the WIR to NRC for review is expected to delay the start of the concurrent NRC review of the WMA C PA and WIR until the FEB to MAR 18 timeframe.  Impact: The delay in receiving comments back from Ecology on the following WMA C documents, Past Leaks Analysis, Baseline Risk Assessment, RCRA Closure Analysis, will delay completion of updates to these documents until sometime in FY18. The delay in the start of NRC review will push

ut completion of the concurrent PA review by the NRC into FY18 and will impact completion of updates to the WMA C PA in response to NRC review

comments until, at the earliest time, the end of the last quarter of FY18. The delay in the start of the NRC review of the WMA C PA will have a similar impact in the NRC review for the WMA C WIR and updates planned in response to NRC review comments on the WIR (See 5.2.4.2.3.2 DOE 435.1 Closure Plans).  Corrective Action: No corrective action. 5.03.12.02.04 Solid Secondary Waste Stream Tech Mat (DFLAW) -$660k  Cause: The CTD SV is due to DFLAW Solid Secondary Waste Phase 3 testing. Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) was performing the DFLAW Solid Secondary Waste testing. An agreement on the contracting method/procurement process for Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) could not be reached. Phase 3 testing activities were originally planned to start late FY 17 4th quarter. This resulted in the delay of starting the Phase 3 testing. The work scope will be awarded to another National Laboratory.  Impact: No impact to critical path or other control accounts.  Corrective Action: There is no corrective action for the CTD SV. The SV is expected to continue into the third quarter of fiscal year 2018.

SLIDE 93

93

Chief Technology Office & Closure Major Contract to Date Variances

January 2018

Schedule (cont.)

5.02.04.02.03 RCRA Closure Plan Updates -$651k  Cause: The CTD SV is primarily due to delayed receipt of comments from ORP and Ecology on the TPA Closure Plans, and from ORP and DOE-EM

n the WIR evaluation.

D. Parker

Jan-18 $100k NTE increase from $100k to $200k. Contract Change Proposal (CP-17-019) submitted to DOE in Nov 2017 awaiting negotiation. BCR RPP-18-025 processed and implemented in November for additional scope.

SLIDE 97

97

Chief Technology Office & Closure BCR Status

January 2018

BCR#/Description Level Assigned Date CAM Target Completion Estimated Impact Current Status

SLIDE 98

One System January 2018

SLIDE 99

99

One System Ov Over erview view

January 2018

SLIDE 100

100

One System Sc Sche hedu dule le Rec ecover ery

January 2018

Cumulative to Date SV Forecast

SLIDE 101

101

One System Major Major Cur Curren ent t Mont Month V h Var arianc iances es

January 2018

Cost

5.03.06.01.03 ILAW Transporters

Cause: The CM CV is due to: The early phase PSSD and ILAW Transporter Prototype Fabrication work scope accomplished during the current

reporting period required fewer resources than planned in the baseline. However, it is expected that as the projects progress, and increased resource ramp up occurs, costs will increase. These expected cost increases will offset the experienced early phase efficiencies.

Impact: There is no impact to any other baseline activities outside of this account.

SLIDE 102

102

One System Major Major Cur Curren ent t Mont Month V h Var arianc iances es

January 2018

Schedule

Nothing to report.

SLIDE 103

103

One System Major Major Con Contr trac act to t to Da Date te V Var arianc iances es

January 2018

Cost

5.01.05.04.04 One System Nuclear Safety & Engineering $3,004k  Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to efficiencies realized as a result of changes in the processes used for the development of Project Implementation Plans (PIPs). Specifically, a standardized PIP process was developed and implemented for the development and completion of multiple PIPs under the Engineering Program Integration account, which eliminated a significant duplication of effort. Additional efficiencies were realized in FY 2014, when PIP templates were development. Implementation of the standardized process and templates required less labor, staff augmentation, and subcontracted resources to perform the PIP work scope. The implementation of a process assigning PIPs with similar

bjectives/scope to subcontracted resources resulted in the realization of additional labor and subcontract efficiencies in the Nuclear Safety DSA

Program Development work package. This is a level-of-effort account that has planned labor resources that are vacant, one Manager and one

Engineer. Due to changes in the nature and volume of scope under this account, there are not any plans to retain resources for these vacancies. This

has resulted in more efficient performance of the work scope with the existing resources.  Impact: There is no impact to any other activities/accounts outside of this account.  Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance. 5.03.12.03.01 Alternative Engineering & Development $2,613k  Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to labor and subcontract efficiencies for:

The LERF/ETF Phased Engineering Study and Strategic Initiatives Analysis Plan (SIAP) is being performed by internal labor resource. This scope

was originally planned to be accomplished via subcontracted resources.

New data was obtained from the CH-TRU project, which resulted in a more efficient analysis of the RH-TRU project risks and issues.
The RH-TRU project risks and issues analysis provided sufficient technical data to eliminate the necessity of conducting the planned RH-TRU

engineering study, and was utilized to prepare a white paper in support of the SIAP.

The effort required for the development, scenario selection, and analysis/organization activities was less than planned due to the experience and

historical knowledge of the internal labor and subcontracted resources that performed the work scope.  Impact: There is no impact to any other activities/accounts outside of this account.  Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance. 5.03.07.05.01 WTP Interface Management $2,465k  Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to experienced labor and subcontract efficiencies in the Secondary Solid Waste Mgmt and Interface Control Program work packages during FY14 and FY15. Secondary Solid Waste Mgmt:

Fewer resources were required to accomplish the work scope due to the utilization of experienced personnel with extensive historical
knowledge. Specifically, the subcontracted WIR author had an excellent background in producing WIRs for other DOE sites, and was able to draft

document sections in less time than estimated. At the same time produced draft WIR section, with the WRPS WIR technical lead, at a quality level that resulted in minimal comments and re-work.

The initial IDF PA subcontractor completed its independent analyses and reviews ahead of schedule, allowing for early closeout of the
subcontract. A subsequent subcontract was awarded to a less costly independent resource where support consisted of simple phone calls for expert

analysis.

More efficient completion of inventory data package scope was experienced, allowing internal resources flexibility to support the WRPS IDF PA
rganization in its level-of-effort activities, which are outside the scope of this WBS.

Interface Control Program:

The accomplishment of work scope under this work package required fewer labor resources than planned as a result of technical lead reviews from

Operations/Engineering personnel, and minimal technical manager oversight of subcontracted resources.  Impact: There is no impact to any other activities/accounts outside of this account.  Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance.

SLIDE 104

104

One System Major Major Con Contr trac act to t to Da Date te V Var arianc iances es

January 2018

Cost (cont.)

5.03.07.08.01 WTP Integrated Readiness Preparation $2,326k  Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to labor efficiencies being realized in the Integrated Readiness Preparation and the Integrated Readiness Program Management work packages. The work scope performed to date has been accomplished by fewer resources than planned due to their experience and historical knowledge of the work scope. The CTD CV in the Integrated Readiness Preparation work package consists of historical labor under-runs in FY14-FY16 as well as additional labor under-runs in the current fiscal year. Additionally, the CTD CV in the Integrated Readiness Program Management work package consists of historical labor under-runs in FY14-FY16, as well as additional labor under-runs in the current fiscal year.  Impact: There is no impact to any other activities/accounts outside of this account.  Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance. 5.03.01.01.08 One System Support Program $2,042k  Cause: The CTD CV for this level-of-effort account is primarily due to:

Labor & Staff Aug: Under the One System Project Controls Management work package, a scheduler is planned to maintain the DFLAW Integration
schedule. The maintenance/update of this schedule has been performed by an existing One System Project Controls resource, and has not required

retention of an additional scheduler. Also, BTR support was planned at 0.8 FTE, with actual support experienced at 0.5 FTE. The number and size of the subcontract support realized to date is less than planned. As a result, a decreased level of BTR support has been required. Additionally, a senior- level communication specialist was planned. An existing staff aug resource was utilized to perform the planned communication specialist work scope through Jan 17. However, this was a shared resource and the actual level of support was less than originally planned. As of Feb 17, a subcontracted resource was retained to perform the communication specialist scope. The subcontracted resource is less experienced than originally planned, and the actual effective hourly rate is less than the planned hourly rate for this position. The level of ESH&Q support planned for level of effort Integrated Permitting Strategies and ESH&Q Program Support work packages has not been experienced. The level of support provided to other

rganizations/projects has been higher than anticipated, which has resulted in a lower level of support to the Integrated Permitting Strategies and

Program Support scope.

Subcontracts: The planned subcontract support for FY 16 and 17 was based on the actual experience for FY 15. One System was re-organized

during FY 15 and conducted independent/external assessments to determine/validate the effectiveness of the One System organizational

changes. Several technical specialists were also retained via subcontract to independent technical and integration support. However, as One System

has evolved and established a foundation since the FY 15 re-organization, it has not required the same level of independent/external subcontracted support and as that experienced in FY 15. Therefore, the actual number and value of subcontract support is less than originally planned.  Impact: There is no impact to any other activities/accounts outside of this account.  Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance. 5.03.01.02.06 Mission Analysis $1,783k  Cause: The CTD CV is due to experienced efficiencies for labor, material, and staff aug resources. Mission Analysis:

Labor: Work scope requested by the Department of Energy, Office of River Protection, did not require planned chemist support. During mid-Jul 15,

the planned Mission Analysis group manager, transitioned to an acting Level 2 manager position. A more junior resource was assigned as the Mission Analysis group manager. The actual hourly rate for the junior resource is less than the manager hourly rate utilized for planning.

Material: Due to the advanced capabilities and performance of site standard computer, the organization was able to utilize site standard computers,

instead of the planned higher cost non-standard high-end computers. Also, software maintenance agreements were not renewed due to lack of quality and service provided by the vendor.

SLIDE 105

105

One System Major Major Con Contr trac act to t to Da Date te V Var arianc iances es

January 2018

Cost (cont.)

5.03.01.02.06 Mission Analysis $1,783k (cont)  Cause: The CTD CV is due to experienced efficiencies for labor, material, and staff aug resources. (cont) Operations & WFD Planning:

Labor: Junior Chemical Engineers were utilized to accomplish the planned work scope, with an actual hourly rate that is less than the Chemical

Engineer hourly rate utilized for planning ($72/hr actual effective rate vs $77/hour planning rate). Also, historical costs were utilized to plan this work, however the effort required was not as substantial as planned. System Plan Rev. 8:

Subcontracts: Based on previous System Plan experience .5 FTE was budgeted to help recover system plan overruns if needed. This support was

not required.  Impact: There is no impact to any other activities/accounts outside of this account.  Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance. 5.03.01.07.01 Project Flowsheets $1,782k  Cause: The CTD CV is due to experienced efficiencies for labor and subcontract resources.

Labor: Fewer Chemical Engineer resources have been required by utilizing personnel with extensive experience and historical knowledge with the

work scope. The Project Flowsheet Manager position was vacant for 5 months (between Jul 16 and Dec 16). The resource retained to fill this position has an effective actual hourly rate that is less than the Manager hourly rate used for planning. This is offset by the Staff Aug modeling support, which is significantly greater than planned, due to both the number of planned resources (1 planned, 2 actual) and the level of support required.

Subcontracts: Due to a realignment of work scope priorities, the planned level of subcontract support has not been required. Internal labor resources

were utilized to perform the work scope.  Impact: There is no impact to any other activities/accounts outside of this account.  Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance. 5.03.01.01.03 WTP Support Program Development $1,352k  Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to labor usage efficiencies in OS Support Program Dev., Project Controls Prog. Mgmt., OS ESH&Q Technical support and OS Front-end Design & Def. Program Mgmt Level of Effort work packages. In FY 2014, delays in company staffing approvals were experienced in Project Controls Prog. Mgmt $521k, OS Front-end Design & Def Program Mgmt $154k, and OS ESH&Q Technical support $470k. In addition, OS Support Program Dev. utilized less subcontract support than planned $290. In FY 2015, labor usage efficiencies were experienced in One System ESH&Q Technical Support $334k and Project Controls Program Mgmt. $287k due to delays in company staffing approvals and vacant positions not being filled. This was partially offset by inefficiencies resulting from the high labor rate for senior-level managers and the unplanned deputy in OS Support Program Dev. -$322k.  Impact: There is no impact to any other activities/accounts outside of this account.  Corrective Action: No corrective actions planned. This is a favorable variance. 5.03.01.02.07 Software Maintenance and Support $1,249k  Cause: The CTD CV is primarily due to labor and subcontract resource efficiencies.

Labor: Junior Chemical Engineers were utilized to accomplish the planned work scope, with an actual hourly rate that is less than the Chemical

Engineer hourly rate utilized for planning ($72/hr actual effective rate vs $77/hour planning rate).

Subcontracts: Between Apr 15 and Jul 15, management assessments and dynamic model evaluations were performed. These activities were
riginally planned to be performed via subcontract. However, it was determined that internal resources had the knowledge and expertise to

Target Forecast Process Control Plan Q4 SEP 2018 Issue Multi-year Operating Plan Revision 6 Q2 JAN 2018 Submit the TSCR Flowsheet Revision 0 Q2 FEB 2018 Submit the RPP Integrated Flowsheet Maturation Plan Revision 3 Q4 AUG 2018 Submit the River Protection Project (RPP) System Plan 8 Addendum (Strategic Plan) – PBI-39.0.1 Q4 SEP 2018 Release Near-Term Operations Tool (NTO) to operational Status – PBI-39.0.7 Q2 APR 2018 Integration of Near-Term Operations Tool (NTO) with TOPSim – PBI-39.0.8 Q4 SEP 2018 Develop the Long-Term Operations (LTO) Tool prototype – PBI-39.0.9 Q4 SEP 2018 Accept delivery of the fabricated prototype Immobilized Low Activity Waste (ILAW) Transporter System – PBI-39.0.2 Q3 JUL 2018 Complete the Draft ILAW container Packaging Specific Safety Document (PSSD) and submit to ORP for comment – PBI-

39.0.4 Q4 SEP 2018 Submit Final Phase 2 ILAW Waste Incidental to Reprocessing (WIR) Technical Basis document to ORP – PBI-39.0.3 Q2 SEP 2018 Implement Tank Waste Treatment Secondary Solid Waste Matrix Q3 JUN 2018 Submit the revised Operational Readiness Support Plan (Revision 4) to ORP – PBI-39.0.5 Q4 SEP 2018 Issue the Direct Feed Low Activity Waste (DFLAW) Integrated Operational Research (OR) Model Results Report – PBI- 39.0.6 Q4 AUG 2018 Issue the CCW Liquid Effluent Disposition Evaluation Report Q3 MAY 2018 Submit the WTP transition support strategy to ORP Q1 NOV 2017

SLIDE 109

109

One System Con Contr trac act Chan t Change ges s

January 2018

Contract Changes Assigned Date Tech Lead Target Completion Estimated Impact ($M) Current Status Contract Mod 424 - NTE for PSSD 23-Feb-17

R. Tedeschi

Jan-18 $200k Contract Change Proposal (CP -17-006) submitted to DOE March 6, 2017. Revised ERRATA submitted to ORP November 1, 2017. ORP evaluation of proposal in progress. Contract Mod 450 - NTE for WTP Transition Support 12-Sep-17

A. Exley

Jan-18 $200k Contract Change Proposal (CP-17-023) submitted to ORP in November 2017. BCR 17-172 implemented in September 2017. Contract Mod 460 - NTE Increase for PSSD 16-Nov-17

R. Tedeschi

Nov-17 $150k Increase PSSD NTE from $200k to $350k. Refer to Current Status for Mod 424 for proposal status (CP-17- 006).

SLIDE 110

110

One System BCR BCR Sta Statu tus s

January 2018

BCR#/Description Level Assigned Date CAM Target Completion Estimated Impact Current Status RPP-18-058 WTP Transition Support 3 3-Jan-18

A. Exley

Jan-18 $350k BCR processed and implemented in January 2018.

SLIDE 111

Production Operations January 2018

SLIDE 112

112

Production Operations Safety Performance Summary

January 2018

As of December 31, 2017 Production Operations has worked 436,140 hours or 327 days without a Lost Time Workday Injury, and has worked 110 days since a Recordable case.

First Aid Case:

12 Month Rolling Average: 6.54

Two Cases in December

 Employee lost balance and struck leg on light plant causing strain to leg.  Employee slipped on ice that was covered in snow causing strain to hand.

Total Recordable Case:

12 Month Rolling Average: 0.48

No Cases in December

Days Away, Restricted or Transferred Case (DART):

12 Month Rolling Average: 0.24

No Cases in December

SLIDE 113

113

Production Operations CM Schedule Performance Overview

January 2018

WBS BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV SPI CPI BCWS BCWP ACWP SV CV SPI CPI TCPI CP VAC CP BAC 5.01.01.01 - Base Operations Project Mgmt 629 669 579 40 90 2,828 2,900 2,678 72 222 1.03 1.08 53,523 53,595 52,036 72 1,559 1.00 1.03 0.95 1,251 60,106 5.01.01.02 - TSR Surveillance & Maintenance

153,460

153,460 153,457

3

1.00 1.00

3

153,460 5.01.01.06 - Solid Waste Management 725 725 633

91

3,319 3,319 3,588

270

1.00 0.92 82,209 82,209 75,090

7,119

1.00 1.09 1.02 7,294 90,263 5.01.01.11 - Base Operations East Area Farms 1,923 1,923 1,851

72

8,808 8,808 9,153

345

1.00 0.96 189,230 189,230 180,087

9,143

1.00 1.05 1.00 9,196 210,220 5.01.01.12 - Base Operations West Area Farms 816 751 735

64

16 3,521 3,409 3,795

112
386

0.97 0.90 71,942 71,830 67,722

112

4,107 1.00 1.06 0.95 3,688 80,217 5.01.01.13 - Base Operations Support/Special Projects 1,675 1,675 2,086

411

7,632 7,632 8,579

946

1.00 0.89 126,336 126,336 146,525

20,189

1.00 0.86 0.92

21,765

145,200 5.01.02.02 - Tank Waste Volume Management 160 160 134

26

1,629 1,513 1,007

116

506 0.93 1.50 28,550 28,381 23,859

169

4,522 0.99 1.19 1.12 4,935 32,300 5.01.02.03 - 242-A Evaporator 627 627 770

143

2,973 2,973 3,470

498

1.00 0.86 77,742 77,742 80,759

3,017

1.00 0.96 0.99

3,068

85,763 5.01.02.06 - Effluent Treatment Facility 1,665 1,066 1,414

599
349

5,208 4,609 6,386

599
1,777

0.88 0.72 55,844 55,245 56,094

599
850

0.99 0.98 1.00

790

70,201 5.01.03.01 - 222-S Laboratory Facility

4

52 4

48
447

602 447

156
0.74

233,563 233,467 227,271

95

6,196 1.00 1.03 2.11 6,247 233,563 5.01.03.03 - 222-S Laboratory Facility Option Period 2 3,268 3,119 3,258

148
139

14,117 13,560 12,959

557

601 0.96 1.05 58,202 57,366 54,019

836

3,347 0.99 1.06 0.98 2,776 90,668 5.01.03.04 - 222-SA Facility Replacement

2
2

13 16 14 3 2 1.24 1.14 1,242 1,241 1,098

1

142 1.00 1.13 0.56 141 1,242 Total 11,487 10,720 11,516

767
795

50,048 49,186 52,232

862
3,046

0.98 0.94 1,131,841 1,130,101 1,118,017

1,740

12,084 1.00 1.01 0.98 9,907 1,253,202 Current Month FYTD Cumulative to Date

CM Schedule Variance -$767k

5.1.2.6 – Effluent Treatment Facility -$599k Cause: LERF Campaigns – Schedule delay due to multiple repairs and issues which kept the plant from processing the first and second 1 million gallons as originally scheduled. Impact: No Impact to critical path or other control accounts. Schedule has been delayed by four months . Schedule recovery of second 1 million gallons planned in May 2018. Corrective Action: No corrective actions required. 5.1.3.3 – 222-S Laboratory Facility Option Period 2 -$148k Cause: (1) Room Renovation – 4N, -$196k – schedule delayed by two months due to the late award of the Construction contract. Contract was awarded in mid-November and mobilization efforts began in December. (2) Ancillary Equipment Addition Design, -$115k – schedule delayed due to an additional iteration of programming and redesign at the 30% as a result of the 30% construction estimate exceeding the $10M minor construction threshold. (3) 222-S Analytical Equipment, $159k – schedule accelerated by four months due to the early receipt of the Inductively Coupled Plasma/Mass Spectrometer (ICP/MS). Impact: (1) No impact to critical path or other control accounts. Schedule has been delayed by two months. Schedule recovery planned in July 2018. (2) No impact to critical path or other control accounts. Schedule has been delayed by one month. Schedule recovery planned in May 2018. (3) No impact to critical path or other control accounts. Schedule acceleration by four months. Corrective Action: (1) No corrective actions required. (2) No corrective actions required. (3) No corrective actions required. 5.1.1.12 – Base Operations West Area Farms -$64k Cause: Delayed start of the Field Lysimeter Test Facility (FLTF) Repairs and Upgrades due to critical resources being dedicated to other WRPS priorities. Impact: No impact to critical path or other control accounts. Schedule recovery planned in June 2018. Corrective Action: No corrective actions required.

SLIDE 114

114

Production Operations CTD Schedule Performance Overview

January 2018

CTD Schedule Variance

$1,740k

5.1.3.3 – 222-S Laboratory Facility Option Period 2 -$836k Cause: (1) 222-S HVAC-Vent Supply & Exhaust Fan Replacement, -$409k – schedule delay associated with the Management Oversight of the project. Due to the four month delayed completion of the design, construction award was re-aligned to the new execution strategy to start in October 2017. Because the Management Oversight activity is a single activity that supports the design and construction, this activity was not re- aligned and will reflect an unfavorable schedule variance through the 2nd quarter FY 2018 as the construction activity progresses through completion. (2) 222-S Room Renovation – 4N, -$446k – schedule delayed by two calendar months due to the late award of the Construction contract. (3) Ancillary Equipment Addition Design, -$161k – schedule delayed by two months due to the late award of the Design Contract. Contract was awarded in mid-November and design efforts were initiated. An additional iteration of programming and redesign at the 30% was needed as the original 30% exceeded the $10M minor construction threshold. Impact: (1) No impact to critical path or other control accounts. Schedule has been delayed by two months. Schedule recovery planned by fiscal-year end. (2) No impact to critical path or other control accounts. Schedule has been delayed by two months. Schedule recovery planned in fiscal month August 2018. (3) No impact to critical path or other control accounts. Schedule has been delayed by one month. Schedule recovery planned in May 2018. Corrective Action: No corrective actions required. 5.1.2.2 – Tank Waste Volume Management -$169k Cause: (1) DST to DST Transfers, -$154k – schedule delay of DST Waste Transfer DT-02 planned from Tank AN-106 to Tank AP-102 in December 2017. This transfer was originally required to support C-105 Retrieval, however, due to efficiencies achieved and early completion of C-105 Retrieval, this transfer is no longer required. The Transfer schedule has been re-sequenced and schedule recovery for DT-02 is planned in February 2018 with the completion of DST Waste Transfer from Tank AP-106 to Tank AW-106. (2) External Transfer, -$15k – schedule delay of the 219-S Transfer tied to the predecessor activity under control account 5.1.3.1.31 “222-S Laboratory 219-S P-1 Pump Replacement”. Impact: (1) No impact to critical path or other control accounts. Schedule has been delayed by two months. Schedule recovery for DT-02 is planned in February 2018. However, due to the new execution strategy and re- sequencing of the transfer schedule, the planned completion of 11 Transfers in FY 2018 has been reduced to 9 Transfers in FY 2018 with two transfer projected to carryover into FY 2019. (2) No impact to critical path or other control accounts. Schedule delays of 23 months, scope originally planned to be completed in March 2016. Schedule recovery planned in February 2018. Corrective Action: No corrective actions required.

SLIDE 115

115

Production Operations CTD Schedule Performance Overview

January 2018

CTD Schedule Variance

$1,740k

5.1.3.1 – 222-S Laboratory Facility -$95k Cause: 219-S P-1 Pump Replacement – initial delays in planning the 219-S Pit Entry Investigative Survey Report (ISR) due to unsuccessfully receiving Joint Review Group (JRG) approvals. The ISR work package was required for completing the Radiological Work Permits (RWP) for inclusion into subsequent work packages. Additional delays realized in September 2016, as the investigative entry was placed on hold until higher priority FY 2016 PBI field work and work that was required to be completed to meet a Department of Ecology terminal date were complete. In October, during the initial entry to perform the ISR, it was identified that the P-2 pump is suspected to be leaking. In November, it was determined that the P-2 pump will be replaced at the same time as the P-1 pump. Therefore, the planning package is being re-planned as “High Risk” which includes the P-2 pump replacement. During December through February further delays were experienced due to the Facility Closure days. Additional two month delay in March due to a review meeting held on the Lockout/Tagout Authorization Form and the discovery of additional criterion required through the work control process. In August, an additional 2 month delay was realized as critical resources were reassigned to Tank Farm Projects and Retrieval to support higher priority scope. In November 2017, partial schedule recovery for the FY 2016 carryover scope 219-S P-1 Pump Replacement was realized, however, full schedule recovery was not achieved as planned due to the P-9 pump failure and troubleshooting activities that were required. The troubleshooting activities revealed the pump needed to be replaced. Planning package preparations are in the process to replace the pump with one that is currently in convenient storage and is planned to be completed in early-January 2018. Once the pump is replace, leak detection/testing activities will resume on the P-1, P-2, and P-9 pumps and turnover to Operations Impact: No impact to critical path. An additional two month schedule delay was realized in November 2017. Impacts to control account 5.1.2.2.16 “External Transfers FY16” successor activity “219-S Transfer” are being realized with the two month delay. Full schedule recovery planned in February 2018. Corrective Action: The planning package was re-planned as “High Risk” which includes the P-2 pump replacement and the detailed schedule with logic ties had been placed into the Field Execution Schedule (FES) in December 2016. In March, a revised JRG process was implemented and was submitted to the JRG for approval in June. In late-July, a follow-up JRG was held and approval to execute this scope was received. In August, due to the availability of critical resources, this scope was delayed an additional 2 months. In November 2017, with the failure of the P-9 pump, planning package preparation was initiated to include the replacement of the pump. 5.1.2.6 – Effluent Treatment Facility -$599k Cause: LERF Campaigns – Schedule delay due to multiple repairs and issues which kept the plant from processing the first and second 1 million gallons as originally scheduled. Impact: No Impact to critical path or other control accounts. Schedule has been delayed by four months . Schedule recovery of second 1 million gallons planned in May 2018. Corrective Action: No corrective actions required. 5.1.1.12 – Base Operations West Area Farms -$112k Cause: Delayed start of the Field Lysimeter Test Facility (FLTF) Repairs and Upgrades due to critical resources being dedicated to other WRPS priorities. Impact: No impact to critical path or other control accounts. Schedule recovery planned in June 2018. Corrective Action: No corrective actions required.

SLIDE 116

116

Production Operations CTD Schedule Projection

January 2018

CTD SV Primary Contributors: -$1,740k

FY 2016 Carryover: 219-S P-1 Pump Replacement -$95k; Schedule recovery in February 2018
FY 2016 Carryover: 219-S External Transfer -$15k; Schedule recovery in February 2018
FY 2018 LERF Campaigns -$599k; Schedule recovery planned in May 2018
FY 2018 222-S HVAC Upgrades -$409k; Schedule recovery in September 2018
FY 2018 222-S Room Renovation – 4N -$446k; Schedule recovery in August 2018
FY 2018 DST to DST Transfer -$154k; Schedule recovery in February 2018
FY 2018 Field Lysimeter Test Facility, -$112k, Schedule recovery in June 2018
FY 2018 222-S Ancillary Equipment Addition Design -$161k; Schedule recovery in June 2018

SLIDE 117

117

Production Operations CM Cost Performance Overview

January 2018

CM Cost Variance -$795k

5.1.2.6 – Effluent Treatment Facility -$349 Cause: Labor usage inefficiencies and material usage inefficiencies due to an increase in labor/overtime and material procurements associated with troubleshooting plant issues, facility repairs, and increasing corrective maintenance required to support re-start of Operations and LERF Campaigns. Impact: No impact to other control accounts. Unfavorable impact to the EAC was realized. Corrective Action: No corrective actions required. 5.1.1.13 – Base Operations Support/Special Projects -$411k Cause: Labor usage inefficiencies due to supporting the Mask Issue/Cleaning Station and additional Enhanced IH Monitoring supporting the HAMTC Stop Work and Court Order Injunction within the DST Farms in FY

2016. Continued labor usage inefficiencies as a DST to DST transfer was not performed in the CM.

Impact: No impact to other control accounts. Unfavorable impact to the EAC was realized. Corrective Action: A REA was submitted in September 2017 to ORP, addressing the HAMTC Stop Work and Court Order impacts. (CP-16-023) 5.1.2.3 – 242-A Evaporator -$143k Cause: Labor usage inefficiencies due to an increase in labor/overtime to support operations activities during the month to prepare for start-up of the 242-A Evaporator Campaign EC-08. Impact: No impact to other control accounts. Unfavorable impact to the EAC was realized. Corrective Action: No corrective actions required. 5.1.3.3 – 222-S Laboratory Facility Option Period 2 -$139k. Cause: Subcontractor usage inefficiencies due to 222-S HVAC major procurement items were invoiced sooner than scheduled. Impact: No impact to other control accounts. Unfavorable impact to the CM EAC was realized Corrective Action: No corrective actions required.

SLIDE 118

118

Production Operations CTD Cost Performance Overview

January 2018

CTD Cost Variance $12,084k

5.1.1.11 – Base Operations East Area Farms $9,143k (LOE Control Accounts) 5.1.3.1 – 222-S Laboratory Facility $6,196k (LOE Control Accounts) 5.1.1.12 – Base Operations West Area Farms $4,107k (LOE Control Accounts) 5.1.3.3 – 222-S Laboratory Facility Option Period 2 $3,347k (LOE Control Accounts) Cause: (1) FY 2014 $6,839k, Labor usage efficiencies in the various LOE control account impacted by Continuing Resolution and unfilled vacant positions (2) FY 2015 $1,507k, Year-End Labor and Overhead Allocations pass back. (3) FY 2016 $571k, Year-End Labor and Overhead Allocations pass back and efficiencies experienced in prior years were minimal in FY 2016 and did not continue. (4) FY 2017 $5,035k, primarily due to Labor usage efficiencies realized due to Facility Closure days “R” time in December (3-days), January (10-days), and February (5-days) for a total of 18 days, with the additional 2 days of “R” Time in May associated with the PUREX incident, vacancies and an increase in taking vacation during July. Additionally, labor rate variances are being realized within multiple disciplines within the LOE control accounts. This was partially off-set by an unfavorable fiscal year-end variance distribution of -$796k in September 2017. (5) FY 2018 -$286k, due to an increase in labor and overtime to support field activities in October -$274k, December -$640k and January -$99k with offsetting efficiencies in November within the 222-S Laboratory $727k. Impact: (1 – 3) No impact to other control accounts. The EACs were favorably impacted by Continuing Resolutions and vacancies in prior years. (4) No impact to other control accounts. The EAC was favorably impacted by the 20 days of “R” time realized and is not anticipated to continue. (5) No impact to other control accounts. The EAC was unfavorably impacted in October, December, January and favorably impacted in November. Monthly fluctuations will occur within these LOE accounts. Corrective Action: (1 – 3) Several vacant positions were filled in FY 2015 and FY 2016. The FY 2017 Budget was modified to reflect the anticipated support required for the year. (4) No corrective action required. The G&A under allocation due to the 18 days of “R” time was implemented in April via BCR RPP-17-102. (5) No corrective action required. The majority of this scope is LOE and will realize monthly fluctuations. 5.1.1.6 – Solid Waste Management $7,119k (LOE Control Accounts) Cause: (1) FY 2014 thru FY 2016, $6,246k – Prior year efficiencies due to this account being dependent upon the levels of waste generated and received from Operations, Projects, and Retrieval field activities. When waste is received by the treatment facilities, they have up-to 12 months to process, which causes monthly fluctuations in invoices received. Additionally, the full implementation of the Reusable Contaminated Equipment (RCE) Program was impacted due to CR in FY 2014. Further impacted in FY 2015 with the vacant planner, and re-assignment of 2 HPTs and 3 NCOs to support the Farm during the first half of the year. The BAC was modified for FY 2017 to reflect the planned field execution strategy. (2) FY 2017, $1,143k – Labor, Material, and Subcontractor usage efficiencies due to this account being dependent upon the levels of waste generated and received from Operations, Projects, and Retrieval field activities. Field work in the first four months of FY 2017 has been impacted by Continuing Resolution and Facility Closure days “R” time in December (3-days), January (10-days), and February (5-days) for a total of 18 days, with the additional 2 days of “R” Time in May associated with the PUREX incident. (3) FY 2018, -$270k – Labor usage inefficiencies in October -$80k and efficiencies in January $91k to support RCE field activities and an increase in shipments to offsite treatment and disposal facilities in November - $108k and December -$172k. Impact: (1) No impact to other control accounts. The EAC was favorably impacted in prior years and has been updated to reflect the expected waste shipments from the field, treatment and disposal schedules from the treatment facilities, and staffing needs for FY 2017. (2) No impact to other control accounts. The EAC was favorably impacted by the 20 days of “R” time realized and is not anticipated to continue. (3) No impact to other control accounts. The EAC was unfavorably impacted in the 1st Quarter of FY 2018 and is not anticipated to continue. Corrective Action: (1) No corrective action required. The FY 2016 Budget was modified to reflect the reduced RCE Program and planned waste shipments from the field and treatment and disposal costs. The FY 2017 BAC was also modified to reflect the planned field execution strategy. This will mitigate further growth to the CTD variance. (2) No corrective action required. The G&A under allocation due to the 18 days of “R” time was implemented in April via BCR RPP-17-102. (3) No corrective action required. This LOE control account will realize monthly fluctuations.

SLIDE 119

119

Production Operations CTD Cost Performance Overview

January 2018

CTD Cost Variance $12,084k (cont’d)

5.1.1.13 – Base Operations Support/Special Projects -$20,189k (LOE Control Accounts) Cause: (1) Production Operations Support Services, -$14,348k – labor and subcontractor usage inefficiencies due to:

a. TF-AOP-015 Response to Reported Odors or Unexpected Changes to Vapor Conditions in FY 2014. As a result, this control account has realized an increase in respiratory equipment procurements; consumables;

deployment of heat stress modules, Hanford Fire Department SCBA support, Crane and Rigging readiness-to-serve, NCO and IHT resources to man the Mask Issue Stations, and MSA Teamster support for transportation of the SCBA bottle to and from the Hanford Fire Department.

b. The HAMTC Stop Work and Court Order Injunction within the DST Farms in FY 2016, requiring additional staff for the use of SCBA when performing min-safe activities and an increase in SCBA bottle cleaning,

building SCBA bottle boxes and drying racks, and procurement of 100-30 minute SCBA bottles and 900 SCOTT AV3000 SCBA Masks. (2) Production Operations Central Shift Office, -$6,046k – labor usage inefficiencies due to:

a. Increased costs associated with round-the-clock valve pit temperature monitoring effective October 1, 2014 through March 31, 2015 set forth in procedure TO-040-790 Revision 8, Tank Farm Plant Operating

Procedure & Operations and training during Red Arrow in FY 2015 Q1.

b. Labor usage inefficiencies, NCOs within the Shift Operations Office due to delays associated with equipment failures and ability to perform Evaporator Campaigns and associated transfers. When NCOs are not

assigned to support discrete scope, they are assigned to support the manning and training for the Shift Relief Team and obtain their multi-certification requirements. Additionally, 12 NCOs were brought on board in January 2016 and charged their first three weeks of training to this account prior to being reassigned to the Farm Teams in February 2016. In addition, two IHTs are required per shift to support enhanced IH Monitoring as a result of the HAMTC Stop Work Order within the DST Farms.

c. HAMTC Stop Work Impacts within the DST Farms due to additional staff required for the use of SCBA when performing min-safe activities.

(3) HAMTC Standing Stop Work Impacts, -$417k – labor usage inefficiencies due to the HAMTC Stop Work Order and Court Order Injunctions impacting waste disturbing activities. Impact: No impact to other control accounts. The EAC has been unfavorably impacted with the increase in costs and has been updated to reflect the anticipated costs through FY 2018. Corrective Action: (1) a. Total FY 2015 Vapor cost impacts are unrecoverable as they were not adequately accounted for in Contract Modification 373 which definitized Vapor Impacts for FY 2015, as the FY 2015 Request for Equitable Adjustment (REA) negotiated FY 2015 Q3/Q4 costs using the Chemical Vapors impacts for FY 2015 Q1/Q2 proposal (CP-15-032) as a basis; vapor impacts were underrepresented during FY 2015 Q1/Q2 for this

account. FY 2016 cost impacts due to vapor issues addressed via Baseline Change Request RPP-16-179 which implemented Contract Modification 386 for FY 2016 Chemical Vapor Impacts.
b. A REA was submitted in September 2017 to ORP, addressing the HAMTC Stop Work and Court Order impacts. (CP-16-023)

(2) a. The FY 2016 and FY 2017 Budgets were modified to include the costs for the round-the-clock valve pit temperature monitoring from October – March.

b. No corrective action required. When discrete scope is performed, this account will realize a reduced utilization and will fluctuate monthly mitigating the cost variance.
c. A REA was submitted in September 2017 to ORP, addressing the HAMTC Stop Work and Court Order impacts. (CP-16-023)

(3) A REA was submitted in September 2017 to ORP, addressing the HAMTC Stop Work and Court Order impacts. (CP-16-023) This work package has been closed, no further actuals will be realized. 5.1.2.3 – 242-A Evaporator -$3,017k Cause: (1) FY 2014 -$2,105k – Labor and non-labor usage inefficiencies required to support emergent facility maintenance and enhancements. (2) FY 2015 $259k – Year-End Overhead Allocations pass back of $219k. (3) FY 2016 -$1,936k – Labor and non-labor usage inefficiencies required to support emergent facility maintenance and enhancements. (4) FY 2017 $1,262k – Labor usage efficiencies realized due to resources reassigned to Tank Farm Projects to support the 242-A Evaporator Integrity Assessment and Facility Closure days “R” time in December (3-days), January (10-days), and February (5-days) for a total of 18 days and with the additional 2 days of “R” Time in May associated with the PUREX incident. (5) FY 2018 -$498k – Labor usage inefficiencies due to an increase in labor/overtime to support completion of the Electrical Outage and maintenance activities prior to extreme winter conditions and prepare for start-up

f the 242-A Evaporator Campaign EC-08.

Impact: (1 – 3) No impact to other control accounts. The EAC was unfavorable impacted in prior years but did not continue in FY 2017. (4) No impact to other control accounts. The EAC was favorably impacted by the 20 days of “R” time realized and is not anticipated to continue. (5) No impact to other control accounts. The EAC was unfavorably impacted in the 1st Quarter FY 2018 and is not planned to continue. Corrective Action: (1 – 3) No corrective action required. The unfavorable cost variance is unrecoverable. (4) No corrective action required. The G&A under allocation due to the 18 days of “R” time was implemented in April via BCR RPP-17-102. (5) No corrective action required. This is primarily an LOE control account and will realize monthly fluctuations.

SLIDE 120

120

Production Operations FY 2018 Spend Forecast

January 2018

PRODUCTION OPERATIONS FY 2018 WBS Level 4 OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB ETC MAR ETC APR ETC MAY ETC JUN ETC JUL ETC AUG ETC SEP ETC Total 5.01.01.01 - Base Operations Project Mgmt 485,922 859,199 754,053 578,738 832,860 948,903 802,645 978,145 766,419 713,093 911,475 864,859 9,496,310 5.01.01.06 - Solid Waste Management 728,634 1,182,290 1,044,095 633,426 1,000,517 995,654 877,233 1,030,005 848,461 848,007 1,117,370 1,162,129 11,467,821 5.01.01.11 - Base Operations East Area Farms 1,833,656 2,821,724 2,646,974 1,850,759 2,550,544 2,893,557 2,388,445 2,914,638 2,272,815 2,233,740 2,916,233 2,767,137 30,090,223 5.01.01.12 - Base Operations West Area Farms 794,957 1,229,306 1,035,352 735,470 1,120,425 1,272,645 1,041,809 1,193,505 978,006 917,506 1,174,751 1,107,867 12,601,599 5.01.01.13 - Base Operations Support/Special Projects 1,759,059 2,406,725 2,326,747 2,086,195 2,331,725 2,463,325 2,500,461 3,587,462 1,975,574 2,152,047 2,692,552 2,736,939 29,018,810 5.01.02.02 - Tank Waste Volume Management 272,781 466,181 134,029 133,881 270,009 688,951 219,940 326,084 688,672 291,924 383,621 271,037 4,147,110 5.01.02.03 - 242-A Evaporator 694,927 1,085,124 920,207 770,066 944,641 1,147,532 972,771 1,169,209 950,287 889,185 1,008,420 990,027 11,542,395 5.01.02.06 - Effluent Treatment Facility 1,342,208 1,882,796 1,746,915 1,414,477 1,661,883 1,509,242 1,847,490 2,177,540 1,605,650 1,653,433 2,040,529 2,401,531 21,283,695 5.01.03.01 - 222-S Laboratory Facility 228,495 252,019 69,286 52,424 45,130

647,355

5.01.03.03 - 222-S Laboratory Facility Option Period 2 2,506,112 3,599,708 3,594,808 3,257,978 4,329,939 4,571,064 4,205,600 5,004,970 4,007,246 3,860,882 4,186,435 3,690,048 46,814,789 5.01.03.04 - 222-SA Facility Replacement 3,030 4,233 4,656 2,152 2,170 313

16,554

FY Spend Forecast 10,649,781 15,789,305 14,277,123 11,515,565 15,089,842 16,491,187 14,856,394 18,381,557 14,093,129 13,559,818 16,431,385 15,991,574 177,126,659

FY2018 Monthly Spend Forecast CM Delta: 2.1%, actuals came in $241k less than the ETC. Labor $245k; Material $206k; Subcontracts -$267k; Other $98k. FY Spend Forecast Delta: -$62k, decrease in spend forecast is a result of CM underrun. PDN Target Delta: -$1,234k, over target.

SLIDE 121

121

Production Operations Key Deliverables

January 2018

Note: Narrative in Blue denotes change from Prior Month.

FY 2018 Key Deliverables Baseline Forecast Improved Tank Farm Infrastructure

PBI-38.0.2.1 – Procure and Install the Analytical Instrument Thermal Desorption Unit (TDU) SEP 2018 JUN 2018 PBI-38.0.2.2 – Procure and Install the Analytical Instrument Gamma Energy Analyzer (GEA) SEP 2018 JUL 2018 PBI-38.0.2.3 – Procure and Install the Analytical Instrument Gas Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer (GC/MS) SEP 2018 MAY 2018 PBI-38.0.3.1 – Complete the 222-S Laboratory Facility Upgrade – HVAC SEP 2018 AUG 2018 PBI-38.0.3.2 – Complete the 222-S Laboratory Facility Upgrade – Site Preparation and Slab Foundation for the Non-Rad Laboratory SEP 2018 SEP 2018 PBI-38.0.3.3 – Complete the 222-S Laboratory Facility Upgrade – Room 4N SEP 2018 AUG 2018 PBI-38.0.7.1 – Complete the 222-S Laboratory Facility Upgrade Design for Ancillary Facility Addition SEP 2018 JUL 2018 PBI-38.0.7.2 – Complete the 222-S Laboratory Facility Upgrade Design for Ancillary Equipment Room Remodel SEP 2018 AUG 2018

Manage DST Space

PBI 37.0.1.1 – 242-A Evaporator Campaign 130,000 WVR (EC-08) SEP 2018 MAY 2018 PBI 37.0.1.2 – 242-A Evaporator Campaign 130,000 WVR (EC-09) SEP 2018 JUL 2018 PBI 37.0.3.1 – Reduce LERF Inventory by 1,000,000 Gallons SEP 2018 MAR 2018 PBI 37.0.3.2 – Reduce LERF Inventory by 1,000,000 Gallons SEP 2018 MAY 2018 PBI 37.0.3.3 – Reduce LERF Inventory by 1,000,000 Gallons SEP 2018 JUN 2018 PBI 37.0.3.4 – Reduce LERF Inventory by 1,000,000 Gallons SEP 2018 SEP 2018 Perform Eleven (11) DST to DST Transfers SEP 2018 OCT 2018 Perform Four (4) DST Recirculation MAY 2018 AUG 2018 Perform the AP Farm In-Process Leak Check/Level Rise of Tank AP-106 DEC 2017 NOV 2017

Maintenance

PBI 40.0.3 – Reusable Contaminated Equipment (RCE) – Disposition of Ten (10) items SEP 2018 AUG 2018

SLIDE 122

122

Production Operations Accomplishments

January 2018

Accomplishments:

Production Operations completed 439 preventive maintenance and 181 corrective maintenance activities, held 18 Emergency Preparedness Operations Drills, and

performed 1,050 hours of housekeeping around the Tank Farms.

The Waste Operations group shipped 7 containers of low level waste to PermaFix Northwest; 3 containers of low level waste and 2 containers of mixed waste to the

Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility (ERDF), 4 containers of samples to off-site laboratories and 6 containers of hazardous waste to Stericycle, for a total of 22 containers to be recycled, samples, treated, and/or disposed.

The 222-S Laboratories brokered 960 samples to off-site commercial laboratories.

Look Ahead:

Complete the testing and turnover of the 219-S P-1 Pump Replacement at the 222-S Laboratory to Operations. (FY 2016 Carryover) February
Complete the External Transfer from the 219-S to the SY-102 DST. (FY 2016 Carryover) February
DST to DST Waste Transfer from Tank AP-106 to Tank AW-106. February
Receive the Gas Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer (GC/MS) analytical equipment on Site supporting PBI-38.0.2.3. March
Complete the 1st LERF Campaign of FY 2018 reducing the LERF Inventory by 1,000,000 Gallons in support of PBI-37.0.3.1. March
Receive the Fourier Transform IR/Thermo Gravity Analyzer (FTIR/TGA) analytical equipment on Site. April

SLIDE 123

January 2018 123

Production Operations Proposed Baseline Change Requests

BCR # WBS L5 FY18 PMB $ Impact ($k) Type Month BCR RPP-18-059 Administrative Changes for January FY 2018  CAM Change from Hartley to Chapman 5.1.1.1.7 $0k Admin IMPLEMENTED BCR RPP-18-083 ETF Air Compressor Design & Procurements (MR)  NTE Requested on 10/19/17; received ORP Direction on 1/23/18 that this is not new scope and does not represent a change to the contract. WRPS position remains as new scope and will follow-up with an REA. 5.1.2.6.15 $370k Level 3 February

SLIDE 124

Improving Stable Worsening

124

Production Operations Key Realized Risks

January 2018

SLIDE 125

125

Production Operations NTE Tracking Report and Contract Change Proposal Log

January 2018

SLIDE 126

126

Production Operations Proposed Issues/Challenges/Opportunities

January 2018

Note: Narrative in Blue denotes change from Prior Month.

ISSUES:

Vapors Lawsuit/HAMTC Memorandum of Agreement (MOA)

Increased costs and schedule impacts.
FY 2016 Scope Deferrals have been identified. BCR RPP-16-192 “FY 2016 & FY 2017 Q1 Work Scope Deferrals - HAMTC Stop Work” was submitted to ORP.
August 2016, A copy of the draft BCR was provided during the ORP Performance Review. BCR was implemented in September 2016.
May 2017, agreement was made with HAMTC and WRPS regarding the IH Control and Monitoring Plan for the upcoming 242-A Evaporator Campaigns EC-06 and EC-07. Efforts are under

way to implement the agreed upon actions and brief employees.

June 2017, a corridor was installed for Enhanced IH Controls and Monitoring during EC-06 to support HAMTC concerns. Zero budget CACNs were opened to capture the costs for future REA
consideration. The corridor was removed after completion of EC-06.
July 2017, due to the change in execution strategy for EC-06 and EC-07, back-to-back campaigns will no longer be achievable. BCR RPP-17-150 was implemented drawing down MR for the

Pre-Requisit activities required for EC-07. This activity was initially returned to MR in BCR RPP-17-026 when the execution strategy change to support back-to-back campaigns.

September 2017, an REA was submitted to ORP addressing the HAMTC Stop Work and Court Order impacts. (CP-16-023)
Contract Negotiations are pending.

222-SL Non-Rad Facility Construction – ORP Direction Pending

October Status:

2 - Construction Bids were received
11/7/17 – Sent an e-mail to WRPS Contracts to set up a meeting with ORP to discuss path forward
11/13/17 – A meeting was held with ORP, Contracts, and Project Controls to discuss the following items:

 Receive ORP agreement on the path forward  Discuss ORPs requirements as the Project value exceeds $10M (GPP)  Receive an NTE to award the Construction Contract and initiate site mobilization and construction activities for FY18  Submit the Final Proposal Package for the full scope (FY18 – FY19) to ORP.  Negotiate Proposal and implement into the baseline

The meeting adjourned with two actions:

 ORP Contracts was going to discuss the $10M issue with ORP Project Controls and get back to WRPS Contracts as to the correct path forward.  WRPS Contracts is going to move forward on submitting the Proposal, which will be based on the average of the two Construction Bids received. November Status:

Letter of Direction from ORP along with an NTE is Pending.
Received action from ORP to scale down the Facility to keep it within $10M. Review of options are underway.
Update Proposal planned to be submitted to ORP in December 2017. Proposal on Hold.

December Status:

The 222-S Laboratory Team and Project Management held a meeting with ORP and RL to outline the guidelines of GPP. A flowchart was provided to help WRPS and ORP determine what

constitutes as Other Project Cost (not included in the $10M GPP). WRPS Engineering and Project Management are reviewing the RFP and Design to determine the path forward. January Status:

The 222-S Laboratory Team, Project Management, WRPS and ORP Contracts held a 2nd meeting to further define the guidelines of GPP. Pending ORP Direction and guidance.

SLIDE 127

127

Production Operations Proposed Issues/Challenges/Opportunities

January 2018

Note: Narrative in Blue denotes change from Prior Month.

ISSUES:

ETF Emergent Scope – ORP Direction Pending

August 2017, a list of emergent scope was identified for the ETF and submitted to WRPS Contract to provide contract determination as “New Scope” or “Risk Realized (MR)”.
September 2017, the list of emergent scope was briefed with ORP during the Monthly Performance Review for August Reporting.
October 2017, A meeting was held with ORP to brief them on the Emergent Scope and WRPS Contract determination; an e-mail was submitted to ORP Contracts requesting NTEs and Letter
f Direction to proceed.
November 2017, pending ORP Direction; a meeting was held with ORP discussing CP-18-005 and the need to receive an NTE and Letter of Direction on 11/27/17 and answer any questions

they may have or need in order to make a determination.

December 2017, pending ORP Direction.
FY 2018 Scope:

 ETF Air Compressor Design, Fabrication, Installation ($700k)  ETF HVAC Chiller Upgrade – Design Only ($200k)  ETF Major Component Life Extension Replacement Evaluation ($200k)

FY 2019 Scope (to be submitted during the FY 2019 Proposal):

 ETF HVAC Chiller Upgrade – Procurement  ETF Reverse Osmosis Valve Replacements  ETF Dilute Caustic Tank Replacement  ETF Air Relief Valves and SALDS Caissons  ETF Rest Room Trailer

January 2018; ORP Direction received on 1/23/18;

 “ORP technical, project controls, and contracting personnel have decided that the equipment upgrades do not represent a change to the contract. ORP does not consider there to be sufficient justification for a change or a Request for Equitable Adjustment regarding the upgrades which consist of: Chiller design, compressor installation, or life extension study. WRPS is directed to proceed with the engineering and work performance necessary to support compressor installation. The remainder of the work should be included in the life-cycle baseline to support FY 19 planning.”  A BCR will be submitted for February Implementation for the ETF Air Compressor Design and Procurements using Management Reserve.  WRPS Contracts will pursue a Request for Equitable Adjustment as this scope has been determined as new scope through the WRPS Contract Screening Process.

SLIDE 128

Maintenance January 2018

M0-280 Kitchen Remodel

SLIDE 129

129

Maintenance Lots Happening

January 2018

M0-280 New HVAC Units installed M0-280 Office Configuration & Furniture placement – doubled occupancy

M0-280 Upgrades:

Kitchen Upgrade
New carpet
New HVAC System
New sub-floor
*New furniture
New exterior

stairs/doors

(*existing furniture to be utilized in other facilities)

SLIDE 130

130

Maintenance Services

January 2018

Maintenance Program Scope

Craft Support to Production Operations, Tank

Farm Projects, and Retrieval Closure

Preventive Maintenance
Corrective Maintenance
Work Planning and Control
Work Package Planning
EAM System & Processes
Facilities and Property Management
Facility Services ie: Electrical/Roofs
PMs, Repairs & Upgrades
Rental Equipment Management
Material Asset Management
Spare Parts –Receipt & Disbursements
Tool Cribs Inventory & Issuance
Warehousing & Tracking
Maintenance Programs
Maintenance Performance Indicators
Procedures, Training Support, etc.
Crane and Rigging
Corrective Actions / PERs

Maintenance Current Month FTEs (January) – 352.4

Performing Organization Responsible Program Reg OT Reg OT Reg OT Reg OT Reg OT Reg OT DIRECT 2B - ESH&Q 2.6 0.2 2.6 0.2 2C - Project Integration

2F - SST Retrievals

16.6 0.1 24.3 0.2 0.1 41.0 0.3 2K - Engineering

2L - Production Operations

33.6 0.3 110.2 8.7 0.6 0.2 144.0 9.6 2M - Tank Farm Projects 8.5 23.1 0.7 31.6 0.7 2P - One System (0.5) (0.5)

2Q - Organization Perf Improvement
2R - LAWPS
2T - Chief Technology Office/Closure

0.1

0.1
NOT ASSIGNED

2.6 0.2 0.3 2U - Maintenance 1.9

6.8
30.6

0.7 13.6 0.2 4.8 0.6 57.7 1.5 INDIRECT X A - Workforce Resources

X

B - ESH&Q

X

C - Project Integration 2.4 2.4

X

D - Business Operations 0.1 0.1

X

H - External Affairs 0.1 0.1

X

J - General Counsel

X

U - Maintenance 4.7 24.9 1.2 28.7 0.2 58.5 1.2 X Y - Labor Relations 1.4 1.4

NOT ASSIGNED
Grand Total FTEs

1.9

70.3

0.4 221.8 11.7 42.6 1.0 5.3 0.6 338.9 13.5

NOTE: OT is .04%

2U000 - Maintenance 2UA00 - Work Control 2UB00 - WRPS Craft Suppt 2UC00 - Maint Programs Total Maint FTEs 2UD00 - Maint Cont Assur

SLIDE 131

131

Maintenance Performance Overview – CM & FYTD

January 2018

CM Schedule Variance: $-10K within threshold CM Cost Variance: $39K within threshold

Values WBSL5 Title CM BCWS CM BCWP CM ACWP CM SV CM CV FYTD BCWS FYTD BCWP FYTD ACWP FYTD SV FYTD CV FYTD SPI FYTD CPI 5.01.01.01.03 - Work Planning & Control 201 192 132

10

60 1,213 882 628

331

254 0.73 1.40 5.01.01.13.02 - Tank Farms Spare Parts Program 123 123 115

8

565 565 734

168

1.00 0.77 5.01.01.10.01 - TOC Direct Facilities Support 561 560 470

1

90 2,337 3,226 2,885 889 341 1.38 1.12 5.01.05.06.04 - Facility and Property Management

5.01.02.06.06 - ETF/LERF/TEDF Spare Parts Program
5.01.01.16.01 - Maintenance Program Management & Oversight FY15
5.01.01.13.12 - TOC Tool Crib Support Services

113 113 75

38

515 515 375

140

1.00 1.37 5.01.02.03.02 - 242-A Evaporator Spare Parts 12 12 1

11

56 56 22

35

1.00 2.62 5.01.03.01.02 - 222-S Laboratory Spare Parts 12 12 9

2

54 54 23

32

1.00 2.39 5.01.01.17.01 - MSA J.3 UBS Services Crane and Rigging 301 301 397

97

1,377 1,377 1,948

571

1.00 0.71 5.01.01.16.02 - Maintenance Program Management & Oversight 211 211 234

23

965 965 1,008

43

1.00 0.96 5.01.01.10.06 - Fall Protection Program

2

1 2

3

2 3

1.17

5.01.01.10.05 - Maintenance Support to Production Operations 254 254 178

76

1,162 1,162 923

239

1.00 1.26 5.01.01.17.02 - MSA J.3 UBS Services, Fleet 143 143 226

82

657 657 655

2

1.00 1.00 5.01.02.06.09 - ETF/LERF/TEDF Spare Parts Program 11 11

2
13

51 51 267

217

1.00 0.19 5.01.02.06.11 - ETF/LERF/TEDF Spare Parts Program - DO NOT USE

5.01.01.10.07 - TOC Equip. Rental & Property Excess & Disposal

148 148 205

57

677 677 747

70

1.00 0.91 Total 2,090 2,080 2,041

10

39 9,630 10,191 10,217 561

26

1.06 1.00

SLIDE 132

132

Maintenance Performance Overview – CTD and Spend Forecast

January 2018

CTD Cost Variance: $3,210K

$977K TOC Direct Facilities Support, labor resource utilization, delays in hiring in FY15 and results from FY17 CR.
$745K Work Planning & Control The favorable CTD cost variance is primarily due lower labor hours than planned for Work Package scope. In addition the project planned for higher

subcontract effort in the final months of the year to support software system (TFMSS to EAM) upgrades, resulting in a under run for this level of effort account.

$660K Tank Farm Spare Parts Program, impacted w/ reduced spending effecting essential restocking which results in a program credit. Min to Max levels evaluated for changes and

restocking needs.

$476K Crane & Rigging, reduced usage of subcontracted MSA services crane and rigging services in TOC base program support. Crane & Rigging services have increased in support
f Capital and Authorized Un-priced Work (AUW) scope, reducing base service costs.

CTD Schedule Variance: $-120K

$-115K Work Planning & Control – Schedule delays due to additional system requirements associated with the TFMSS to EAM implementation

Current Month FY Spend Forecast, $1,276K, 4.0%

Addition of ETF Critical Spares $157K
Increased 2704HV Roof ETC to align with Vendor Estimate $515K
Increased Work Control Training for new hires $200K
Increased Material to support TOC Spares $258K

PDN Target Delta, -$1,395K

Addition of ETF Critical Spares $157K
Increased 2704HV Roof ETC to align with Vendor Estimate $515K
Increased Work Control Training for new hires $200K
Increased Material to support TOC Spares $258K

WBSL5 Title CTD BCWS CTD BCWP CTD ACWP CTD SV CTD CV CTD SPI CTD CPI BAC TCPI CTD 5.01.01.01.03 - Work Planning & Control 14,678 14,563 13,819

115

745 0.99 1.05 16,547 0.93 5.01.01.13.02 - Tank Farms Spare Parts Program 6,441 6,441 5,781

660

1.00 1.11 7,788 0.89 5.01.01.10.01 - TOC Direct Facilities Support 27,443 27,436 26,458

7

977 1.00 1.04 32,718 0.82 5.01.05.06.04 - Facility and Property Management 35,244 35,244 35,232

12

1.00 1.00 35,244

5.01.02.06.06 - ETF/LERF/TEDF Spare Parts Program

1,517 1,517 885

633

1.00 1.71 1,517

5.01.01.16.01 - Maintenance Program Management & Oversight FY15

520 520 498

22

1.00 1.04 520

5.01.01.13.12 - TOC Tool Crib Support Services

4,161 4,161 3,604

557

1.00 1.15 5,389 1.21 5.01.02.03.02 - 242-A Evaporator Spare Parts 188 188 185

3

1.00 1.02 323 1.06 5.01.03.01.02 - 222-S Laboratory Spare Parts 636 636 267

369

1.00 2.38 766 0.80 5.01.01.17.01 - MSA J.3 UBS Services Crane and Rigging 13,942 13,942 13,466

476

1.00 1.04 17,223 1.13 5.01.01.16.02 - Maintenance Program Management & Oversight 5,362 5,362 6,120

758

1.00 0.88 7,662 0.94 5.01.01.10.06 - Fall Protection Program

3

2 3

1.17

273 1.03 5.01.01.10.05 - Maintenance Support to Production Operations 5,572 5,572 5,110

461

1.00 1.09 8,340 1.05 5.01.01.17.02 - MSA J.3 UBS Services, Fleet 2,620 2,620 2,939

319

1.00 0.89 4,186 1.01 5.01.02.06.09 - ETF/LERF/TEDF Spare Parts Program 324 324 290

35

1.00 1.12 445 1.08 5.01.02.06.11 - ETF/LERF/TEDF Spare Parts Program - DO NOT USE

5.01.01.10.07 - TOC Equip. Rental & Property Excess & Disposal

1,761 1,761 2,426

664

1.00 0.73 3,375 1.08 Total 120,410 120,290 117,080

120

3,210 1.00 1.03 142,316 0.96

Values in $K ACWP/ETC Oct-17 (4W) Nov-17 (5W) Dec-17 (4W) Jan-18 (4W) Feb-18 (4W) Mar-18 (5W) Apr-18 (4W) May-18 (5W) Jun-18 (4W) Jul-18 (4W) Aug-18 (5W) Sep-18 (5W) FY Spend Forecast PDN Target Delta Sep-17 1,658 3,183 2,460 3,363 2,202 2,697 2,594 3,016 2,573 2,473 2,892 2,583 31,696 Oct-17 1,819 4,376 2,921 2,136 2,007 2,647 2,642 3,098 2,367 2,398 2,687 3,051 32,148 Nov-17 1,819 3,668 2,751 2,153 2,537 2,667 2,640 3,181 2,710 2,377 2,654 2,633 31,790 Dec-17 1,819 3,668 2,688 2,355 2,433 2,943 2,404 2,989 2,500 2,201 2,659 3,119 31,777 Jan-18 1,819 3,668 2,688 2,041 2,530 3,159 2,820 3,139 2,589 2,687 2,947 2,964 33,053 31,658

1,395

Delta

313

97 216 417 151 90 487 288

155

1,276 Percentage

13.3%

4.0% 7.3% 17.3% 5.0% 3.6% 22.1% 10.8%

5.0%

4.0%

SLIDE 133

133

Maintenance Estimate-at-Completion

January 2018

Level 5 WBS Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 ETC Total FY Spend Forecast BAC FY18 PDN ETC/PDN Delta 5.01.01.01.03 - Work Planning & Control 104 184 208 132 216 291 248 283 234 294 291 282 2,663 2,767 3,082 2,810 43 5.01.01.10.01 - TOC Direct Facilities Support 270 1575 570 470 661 647 827 777 781 850 887 1038 9,084 9,354 7,613 8,336 (1,019) 5.01.01.10.05 - Maintenance Support to Production Operations 154 317 274 178 297 353 312 368 294 291 367 356 3,407 3,561 3,931 3,857 296 5.01.01.10.06 - Fall Protection Program 1 1 1 35 62 29 54 82 265 265 273 268 3 5.01.01.10.07 - TOC Equip. Rental & Property Excess & Disposal 135 152 255 205 190 212 189 200 169 169 187 182 2,111 2,246 2,291 2,249 3 5.01.01.13.02 - Tank Farms Spare Parts Program 312 105 202 115 114 295 121 154 253 148 246 181 1,933 2,245 1,744 1,880 (365) 5.01.01.13.12 - TOC Tool Crib Support Services 102 92 106 75 115 138 117 141 113 114 141 140 1,292 1,394 1,912 1,708 314 5.01.01.16.02 - Maintenance Program Management & Oversight 212 287 275 234 229 349 292 368 282 281 338 321 3,255 3,468 3,265 3,275 (193) 5.01.01.17.01 - MSA J.3 UBS Services Crane and Rigging 399 636 515 397 534 565 363 530 224 224 229 228 4,446 4,845 4,657 4,564 (281) 5.01.01.17.02 - MSA J.3 UBS Services, Fleet 98 136 196 226 194 211 169 211 169 169 211 211 2,101 2,198 2,223 2,179 (20) 5.01.02.03.02 - 242-A Evaporator Spare Parts 17 7

3

1 8 36 15 26

15

20 19 17 131 148 191 187 39 5.01.02.06.09 - ETF/LERF/TEDF Spare Parts Program 1 158 110

2
34

19 93 5 3 25 11

10

378 378 171 168 (211) 5.01.03.01.02 - 222-S Laboratory Spare Parts 16 17

20

9 6 10 12 47 28 20 20 18 168 184 184 180 (4) Total Spend Forecast 1,819 3,668 2,688 2,041 2,530 3,159 2,820 3,139 2,589 2,687 2,947 2,964 31,234 33,053 31,538 31,658 (1,395) Direct ACWP ETC

SLIDE 134

134

Maintenance Portfolio Management

January 2018

Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 Column 6 Column 7 Column 8 Column 9

FY18 BUDGET

With C/O

(BAC) FY18 EAC (Act + Fcst)

Updated 10/16/17

BCRs PROCESSE D or PENDING (BAC) FY18 ADJ BUDGET with c/o (BAC) FY18 EAC (Act + Fcst) FY18 PDN, R3 (Funds) PDN - FY EAC Delta EAC CHANGE FROM PRIOR MO

2U Maintenance

272

5.1.1.1.3 - Work Planning & Control c/o 2,867 2,652 2,867 2,767 2,810 43 115

273

5.1.1.10.1 - TOC Direct Facilities Support c/o 8,509 8,835 8,509 9,355 8,336 (1,019) 520

274

5.1.1.10.5 - Maintenance Support to Production Operations 3,931 3,498 3,931 3,561 3,857 296 63

275

5.1.1.10.6 - Fall Protection Program 273 266 273 265 268 3 (1)

276

5.1.1.10.7 - TOC Direct Equipment Rentals 2,291 2,243 2,291 2,246 2,249 3 3

277

5.1.1.13.2 - Tank Farms Spare Parts Program 1,912 1,981 1,912 2,245 1,880 (365) 264

278

5.1.1.13.12 - TOC Tool Crib Support Services 1,744 1,677 1,744 1,394 1,708 314 (283)

279

5.1.1.16.2 - Maintenance Program Management & Oversight 3,265 3,368 3,265 3,468 3,275 (193) 100

280

5.1.1.17.1 - MSA J.3 UBS Services Crane and Rigging 4,657 4,556 4,657 4,845 4,564 (281) 289

281

5.1.1.17.2 - MSA J.3 UBS Services, Fleet 2,223 2,179 2,223 2,198 2,179 (20) 20

282

5.1.2.3.2 - 242-A Evaporator Spare Parts 191 152 191 148 187 39 (4)

283

5.1.2.6.9 - ETF/LERF/TEDF Spare Parts Program 171 169 171 378 168 (211) 209

284

5.1.3.1.2 - 222-S Laboratory Spare Parts 184 201 184 184 180 (4) (17)

285

Total Maintenance 32,218 31,777 32,218 33,053 31,658 (1,395) 1,276

Column 1

CONTROL ACCT SUMMARY (WBS LEVEL 5) by Responsible Org Group

c/o - carryover

As of January 2018 Month-end

Line No.

EXPENSE

Fiscal Year 2018 Cost Estimate

As of Dec 2017 Month-end

January - Prelim

2/06/2018

EAC Change from Prior Month, $1,276K

Addition of ETF Critical Spares $157K
Increased 2704HV Roof ETC to align with Vendor Estimate $515K
Increased Work Control Training for new hires $200K
Increased Material to support TOC Spares $258K

SLIDE 135

135

Maintenance Baseline Change Requests

January 2018

BCR # Description WBS L5 FY18 PMB Impact ($K) Type Month RPP-18-076 2704HV Roof Replacement 5.1.1.10.1 $990K Level 3 February RPP-18-TBD Procurement of ETF UV/OX System Critical Spares (Ultraviolet Oxidation) 5.1.2.6.9.2 $177K Level 3 March

SLIDE 136

136

Maintenance Monthly Tracking – Delinquent PMs & CMs

January 2018

PM Goal: 50% reduction from FY17 (Sept) of 22 PM’s Goal of 11 or less by end of FY18 CM Goal: Maintenance to establish technical basis for CM steady state - TBD

Team Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept

AN 2 AZ 8 5 1 1 FACILITIES 4 7 8 6 ETF 9 23 7 7 EV 26 23 17 9 LABS 10 2 5 4 Projects WS R&C 1 ST 2 3 2

Totals 59 66 40 27 Team Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept

AN 6 4 3 5 AZ 7 8 9 9 FACILITIES 4 5 6 10 ETF 20 21 21 23 EV 7 5 1 2 LABS 19 19 21 23 Projects 2 2 1 1 WS R&C 3 3 3 4 ST 5 5 7 6 Transfer

Totals 73 72 72 83

Delinquent PMs - FY2018 CM Backlog - FY2018

SLIDE 137

137

Maintenance Monthly Tracking – Completed PMs & CMs

January 2018

Total FY CMs: 161 Total FY PMs: 2,244

Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Field Work Complete - CMs 40 43 32 46 Field Work Complete - PMs 589 628 473 554

Month CMs - FWC All Work CM - Backlog WOs >180 days PMs - FWC PM - Delinquent Exceeded Grace FY18 - 10 October, 2017 40 73 589 59 FY18 - 11 November, 2017 43 72 628 66 FY18 - 12 December, 2017 32 72 473 40 FY18 - 01 January, 2018 46 83 554 28

SLIDE 138

138

Maintenance Monthly Performance

January 2018

WRPS Spares – January Performance

Total material issued $313,522 Total material received $217,377

Month Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep FYTD Total Matl Issued $250,376 $309,144 $43,289 $313,522 $916,331 Matl Receipt $536,900 $517,794 $185,551 $217,377 $1,457,622 Difference ($286,524) ($208,650) ($142,262) $96,145 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ($541,291) Fiscal Year 2018 Month Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep FYTD Total Issued 88 129 79 192 488 Receipt 98 69 21 54 242 TOTAL 186 198 100 246 730 Fiscal Year 2018

Spare material issued over $1,000.00 Cartridge, Q Gard Filter, quantity 3 Filter, Gas Filtration System, quantity 2 Pump, ¾ hp, 115/230 V, quantity 2 Module, input, analog ABB Type, quantity 1 Spare material received over $1,000.00 Breaker, circuit DS-206, lower stud assembly, quantity 1 Manipulator, Anvil, quantity 6 Manifold, pressure differential, quantity 3 Pump, SS wetted parts 1 in inlet, quantity 1 Plug, rotameter, valve, quantity 4 Spare material issued over $2,000.00 Transmitter, differential pressure, quantity 1 Spare material received over $2,000.00 Cartridge, Q gard filter, quantity 5 Light, lamp, A10 UV replacement, quantity 3 Electrode, primary pH for L&N meter, quantity 8 Spare material received over $3,000.00 Kit, Rotary maintenance, quantity 5 Cartridge, quantum, tex polishing, quantity 6 Transmitter, 702 wireless discrete, quantity 1 Spare material issued over $4,000.00 Contactor, electrical heat, quantity 30 Pump, vacuum, 2567 series, quantity 4 Spare material received over $4,000.00 Board, printed circuit, SPU-2, quantity 2 Board, printed circuit SPU-2 alarm, revision 2.2, quantity 2 Bearing, sleeve, thin film dryer, quantity 1 Spare material issued over $5,000.00 Cable, take up assembly, quantity 6 Spare material received over $5,000.00 Breaker, circuit, DS-632, Lower stud assembly quantity 1 Contactor, electrical heat, quantity 40 Kit, Nikkiso, quantity 1

SLIDE 139

139

Maintenance GSA & Commercial Leased Vehicles

January 2018

FY17 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Commercial Leases 140 140 140 130 130 GSA Leases 306 306 306 316 316

SLIDE 140

140

Maintenance Accomplishments / Look Ahead

January 2018

Accomplishments FYTD

Completed M0-280 Fire Riser Leak Repair
Completed 2101HV HVAC Ducting and Replacement
Completed 2713S Fire alarm battery box upgrade
Completed purchase of 9 leased trailers
Completed 2750E D Wing Switchgear Replacement (PBI-40.0.01)
Completed 2750E Elevator Repair
Completed M0-173 Facility Reconfiguration
Completed 2750E Tree Trimming
Completed 2750E Rain Gutter and Heat Trace Installation
Completed 2704HV Roof Repair SOW

Look Ahead

Award 2704HV Roof Replacement contract (Feb 2018)
Complete 2750E B103 Conference Room upgrade (April 2018)
Complete M0-280 Facility Upgrades (May 2018)
Complete Tool Crib & Fleet EAM Module Implementation (June 2018)

SLIDE 141

141

Maintenance Challenges/Issues/Opportunities

January 2018

Challenges Reductions in Delinquent Preventive Maintenance & Corrective Maintenance Backlog

Emphasis and teamwork approach will be the focus for the PM backlog, continued farm team attention and

priority.

New and/or upgraded facilities are needed, new maintenance shop is needed (Carpenter & Paint shop highest

priority)

Additional hiring will need infrastructure support (i.e. Facilities, vehicles, maintenance).
Aging Facilities, attain a proactive risk approach to facility maintenance.

1. 2704HV Roof Replacement 2. 2750E Water Lines Issues

None at this time

Opportunities Equipment and Vehicle Tracking

GPS tracking of WRPS rental equipment.
Vehicle utilization improvements related to vehicle usage, types, and routes continues to be worked.
New Maintenance Shop
Feasibility analysis to be performed in FY18

Material Management

Material excessing continues.
Additional WRPS staging center for controlled material issuance.

Charging Station

Installing electric vehicle charging stations at 2750E and 2704HV should be evaluated in FY18.

SLIDE 142

142

Maintenance FY18 Planning – FY18 PEMP

January 2018

PBI-40.0 CLIN 2 East Area Facility Maintenance Performance Fee value is established at $500,000 the FY 2018 fee pool

1. Complete replacement of the 2750E Switchgear by June 30, 2018. The Contractor shall earn $250,000 upon completion.

Work scope/completion criteria: This is an electrical upgrade to replace the aging infrastructure at 2750E located in the 200 East

Area. The switchgear is original to the building and beyond its service life, replacement parts are no longer available, the installation

does not meet the requirements of the National Electrical Code and the arc flash incident energy exceeds the amount allowable for maintenance to perform preventative maintenance (PM) on the equipment. The main 13.8 kV service and switchgear equipment needs to be removed and a new larger transformer (500k VA and 225kVA) and new switchgear installed. The new larger capacity equipment will allow maintenance to perform PMs and support future expansion of the building and increased occupancy. B-wing switchgear is currently scheduled to be complete in FY 2017 with the replacement to D-wing switchgear to be completed in FY 2018. Installation of a new service entrance rated enclosed circuit breaker in B-wing will serve the new power panel in D-Wing. Completion document: Letter transmitting the performance expectation completion notice and copy of the work order signature page(s) approved through Field Work Supervisor.

2. Complete repair of the 2704-HV roof by September 30, 2018. The Contractor shall earn $250,000 upon completion.

Work scope/completion criteria: This is a roof repair to the aging infrastructure at 2704-HV. The building is 24 years old and part of

ur aging infrastructure. 2704-HV is the largest administrative building for WRPS, housing many different groups. Maintaining this

building is vital for WRPS moving forward. The roof is the original to the building and beyond its service life. The roofing material is ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM) and will be replaced with a similar product. Completion document: Letter transmitting the performance expectation completion notice and copy of the work order signature page approved through Field Work Supervisor