Product Product Innovation and Innovation and Access to Finance Access to Finance Access to Finance Access to Finance
Keith Jefferis Keith Jefferis Egyptian Banking Institute – 3rd Annual Banking Conference Cairo, November 22-23, 2009
Product Product Innovation and Innovation and Access to Finance - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Product Product Innovation and Innovation and Access to Finance Access to Finance Access to Finance Access to Finance Keith Jefferis Keith Jefferis Egyptian Banking Institute 3 rd Annual Banking Conference Cairo, November 22-23, 2009
Keith Jefferis Keith Jefferis Egyptian Banking Institute – 3rd Annual Banking Conference Cairo, November 22-23, 2009
Banking & access to finance
Challenges in “banking the unbanked”
New business models – – mobile phone & branchless mobile phone & branchless
New business models – – mobile phone & branchless mobile phone & branchless banking banking
Regulatory issues & implications
Supportive conditions for new products to reach the unbanked unbanked
Supports economic growth by boosting savings & investment investment
Improves overall economic efficiency, by making financial
Improves overall economic efficiency, by making financial intermediation more efficient intermediation more efficient
Promotes more inclusive growth, with lower poverty and inequality inequality
Enables the poor to better manage their money, accumulate savings from small sums, to borrow to finance investment, savings from small sums, to borrow to finance investment, and to insure against losses and to insure against losses
Rwanda '08
% of adults banked
Source: FinScope
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% South Africa '08 Botswana '09 Malawi '08 Kenya '06
Source: FinScope
Low income
Irregular / volatile income
Unemployed or irregular employment
Dependent upon social welfare grants and/or private remittances Low wealth/assets Low wealth/assets
Low wealth/assets
Save by accumulating small sums
Predominantly rural, although often mobile geographically
Low education
Limited capacity to pay fees/transaction costs for financial services
Branch-
based
Expensive infrastructure (IT, bricks & mortar)
Expensive staff
High fixed & operational costs
Focus on larger, more profitable transactions
Geared towards wealthier customers, regular employment & incomes
Not well suited to low value txns txns, poor clients, low density markets , poor clients, low density markets – – fixed fixed txn txn & overhead costs too high & overhead costs too high
Low fixed per-
customer & transaction costs
Shift towards variable costs/commissions
Technology-
based
Technology-
based
Distribution structure highly fragmented (“granular”), low volume per outlet, and low cost volume per outlet, and low cost
Convergence between financial services and telecomms telecomms
Shift towards branchless/agency banking
Experience in low-
cost high-
volume services
Prepaid airtime -
> stored value
Secure sim sim-
based front end can be extended to financial services
Back-
end tx tx processing systems can encompass financial services processing systems can encompass financial services -
&
Back-
end tx tx processing systems can encompass financial services processing systems can encompass financial services -
& cheaper than banking systems cheaper than banking systems
MNOs have widespread agency networks have widespread agency networks
Agents have KYC experience
Rapid technological change -
> falling costs
Build on MNO marketing/brands
Kenya Rwanda 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% South Africa Botswana Malawi Mobile penetration, % popn, 2008 % of adults banked
Money trans- fers P2P Money trans- fers P2P Bill pmt P2B Bill pmt P2B Wel- fare pmts/ pen- sions G2P Wel- fare pmts/ pen- sions G2P Mer- chant pmts B2B Mer- chant pmts B2B Loan rep & saving P2F Loan rep & saving P2F In- store pmts P2B In- store pmts P2B Cash deps/ with- drawal s Cash deps/ with- drawal s E- money issua- nce E- money issua- nce
MMT (P2P)
M-
Pesa (Kenya) (Kenya) – – 7 million customers 7 million customers
M-
Pesa Kenya Kenya-
UK
MTN mobile money (Uganda, Rwanda, Ghana)
P2P & P2B
Zain Zap (Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania) Zap (Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania)
Other
MMT services in Sierra Leone, Somalia, Senegal, Madagascar, Nigeria
Full mobile banking
Wizzit, MTN (South Africa) , MTN (South Africa)
Mobile phone-
based services services
Phone as terminal
Very widespread
Card/POS systems
Merchant-
based systems
More restricted outlets (POS terminals) (POS terminals)
Very widespread
PIN-
based security
Well-
suited to remote transactions transactions – – esp. MMT
Does not need bank partner except as service provider except as service provider (POS terminals) (POS terminals)
Well suited to agency/branchless banking agency/branchless banking
Security advantages (biometrics) (biometrics)
Requirements
Telecomms network network
SIM/Smartcards
Retail/agency network
Terminal devices
Innovations
Innovation being driven by MNOs MNOs and technology and technology companies companies
Banks only needed to provide support services provide support services
Terminal devices (phone/POS) (phone/POS)
Access to banking services & settlement system settlement system
Does not require developed banking infrastructure banking infrastructure
provide support services provide support services (trust accounts & access to (trust accounts & access to settlement system) settlement system)
Regulatory decisions crucial in determining business in determining business models models
Progress in challenging environments (Somalia, environments (Somalia, Sierra Leone, Afghanistan, Sierra Leone, Afghanistan, DRC) DRC)
MNO only
M-
Pesa
MNO/bank JV
Bank only
Internet banking
MNO/bank JV
Zain Zap Zap
Technology co/bank JV
Smartswitch (Botswana) (Botswana)
Wizzit (SA) (SA)
Requirements for branchless/mobile banking to be transformational: transformational:
Use existing infrastructure that already reaches unbanked people (e.g. mobile networks) people (e.g. mobile networks) people (e.g. mobile networks) people (e.g. mobile networks)
Driven by new players with different target markets to traditional banks (e.g. traditional banks (e.g. MNOs MNOs) )
Use new distribution networks for cash transactions (e.g. airtime sellers) airtime sellers)
Offer lower-
cost solutions than conventional banking (yes)
Issues:
Banking license required?
Payments service provider (PSP) or e e-
money license?
Balancing prudential regulation and consumer protection
Balancing prudential regulation and consumer protection
Balancing a supportive enabling environment with risk reduction reduction
Implementing AML regulations
Outcomes
Regulatory gaps – – innovation ahead of regulation innovation ahead of regulation
No consistent regulatory position
“hands-
“hands-
Full bank control (South Africa)
Main concerns are with consumer protection:
Trust account backing for card/phone balances
System integrity (safeguards against IT failure & fraud, audit trails, DRP, handset/card security) trails, DRP, handset/card security)
Agency network trust/reliability
Low financial penetration, high cellphone penetration high cellphone penetration
Balanced political influence of banks and banks and MNOs MNOs
Accommodating regulations
Simple & flexible regulatory structure structure
MMT not deposit-
taking – – regulate as PSP regulate as PSP
Important role for remittances
National ID system in place
Government supportive – – shifting payments to new shifting payments to new platforms platforms
regulate as PSP regulate as PSP
Regulate low value deposits as e e-
money
Focus on consumer protection
few systemic issues
Allow outsourcing of banking services (retail/agents) services (retail/agents)
Flexible AML/KYC