Probiotics and the Prevention of Necrotizing Enterocolitis , - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Probiotics and the Prevention of Necrotizing Enterocolitis , - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Probiotics and the Prevention of Necrotizing Enterocolitis , Death , and Sepsis S ave the dates Monday, March 11 at 12pmET Experiences of Centers Routinely Using Probiotics - University of Utah - Kaiser Permanente, Northern California
S ave the dates
Monday, March 11 at 12pmET
Experiences of Centers Routinely Using Probiotics
- University of Utah
- Kaiser Permanente, Northern California
- Kaiser Permanente, Southern California
Monday, May 6 at 12pmET
Practical Considerations and Consent
- Emory University
- UC Davis
- Patient-family perspective
Disclaimer
This an educational webinar series. The NEC Society and invited speakers are not marketing any probiotic products, which are not currently FDA approved for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis or
- ther neonatal diseases.
Jennifer Canvasser
with son, Micah
Founder, Director of
NEC Society
Vision: create a world
without NEC
Jennifer@
NECsociety.org
Today’s speakers
Jennifer Canvasser, MS W Founder, Director NEC S
- ciety
Mark Underwood, MD, MAS Professor of Pediatrics UC Davis, CA S cientific Advisor, NEC S
- ciety
Ravi Patel, MD, MS c Associate Professor of Pediatrics Emory University, Atlanta, GA S cientific Advisor, NEC S
- ciety
Overview of today’s webinar
History and mechanisms
Mark Underwood, MD, MAS
Review of clinical trials to date
Ravi Patel, MD, MS
c
Product choices and quality considerations
Mark Underwood, MD, MAS
Patient-family perspective
Jennifer Canvasser, MS
W
222 registrants from 15 countries
Probiotics
History and mechanisms of action
Mark Underwood MD UC Davis
Disclosures: Abbott (speakers bureau) Avexegen (advisory board) IBT (chair DSMB) Evolve (support for clinical trial) Probiotics are not approved by the FDA for the treatment, mitigation or prevention of any disease
History
1899 Henri Tissier: Y shaped bacteria dominate the
feces of healthy breast fed infants
1907 Elie Metchnikoff proposed consumption of
lactic acid producing bacteria to improve health
1917 Alfred Nissle isolated a dominant strain of E
coli from a healthy soldier and fed it to soldiers with dysentery
With the discovery of antibiotics, probiotics moved
to the fringes
History
1999 Angela Hoyos: first probiotic cohort
- study. 25 bed NICU in Bogota. Treatment
year (1994-1995): all patients received Infloran (250M B. inf ant is and 250M L. acidophilus) once daily from admit to
- discharge. N=1237 Comparison year
(1993-1994): no probiotic administration. N=1282
Hoyos AB, 1999 Int J Infect Dis
History
1999 Michael Caplan: first NEC animal study of
probiotics and NEC
Control Probiotic Caplan MS , Gastroenterology 1999
Mechanisms
Alter the composition of the gut microbiota Decrease pro-inflammatory response Decrease intestinal permeability and bacterial
translocation
Effects of bacterial metabolites
Gut Microbiota
922 samples from 58 preemies La Rosa, PNAS 2014 16,669 infants < 33 weeks Yee WH, Pediatrics 2012
Proteobacteria Firmicutes Bacteroidetes Control NEC Control NEC Control NEC Pammi M, Microbiome, 2017
Meta-analysis of 8 studies of fecal samples prior to NEC
- 106 infants with NEC
- 278 control infants
- 2944 samples
Mechanisms for changing the microbiota
Bacteriocins Competition for human milk oligosaccharides Anaerobic vs aerobic conditions Competition for iron?
Is it possible to change the fecal microbiota?
Underwood 2013 J Pediatrics
- B. breve M16V
Underwood, 2017 JPGN
Decrease pro-inflammatory response
TLR4 LPS NFKB TNF alpha, IL1beta, IL6, IL8, IL23
PMN recruitment Lymphocyte recruitment TOLLIP/SIGIRR B infantis B bifidum B breve B lactis L acidophilus L reuteri L rhamnosus
Decrease intestinal permeability
Barrier failure Prematurity: Increased apoptosis, decreased mucin production, absent Paneth cell function B infantis B bifidum B breve B lactis L acidophilus L reuteri L rhamnosus
Bacterial metabolites
Lactate and short chain fatty acids B vitamins S
econdary bile acids
Tri-methyl amine oxide
Probiotics: Review of clinical trials to date
Ravi Mangal Patel, MD, MS c Associate Professor of Pediatrics Emory University and Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta rmpatel@ emory.edu @ ravimpatelmd
#preventNEC Disclosure: Probiotics are not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the prevention of NEC or
- ther diseases in preterm
infants. This webinar is intended to be educational in nature only.
Deaths caused by NEC
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Percent of all deaths caused by NEC Postnatal age
Patel RM, et al. N Engl J Med. 2015
Causes of death for 6075 deaths among 22,248 live births at 22-28 weeks’ gestation at 25 US academic centers within the NICHD Neonatal Research Network
#preventNEC
Trends in NEC incidence
Horbar et al. JAMA Pediat r. 2017
~7% Under 5%
#preventNEC
Prevention of NEC
Prevent NEC
Dysbiosis
Prematurity
Abnormal intestinal oxygenation Inconsistent feeding Non-human milk feeding
Drivers Aim
#preventNEC
Prevention of NEC
Prevent NEC
Dysbiosis
Prematurity
Abnormal intestinal oxygenation Inconsistent feeding Non-human milk feeding
Drivers Aim
#preventNEC
Probiotic trials to date:
#preventNEC
46 RCTs enrolling 12,185 preterm infants Risk ratio of on NEC: 0.5 (95% CI 0.4 - 0.6) Risk difference: -0.03 (95% CI -0.03 to -0.02)
#preventNEC
Probiotic trials to date:
#preventNEC PiPs Trial ProPrems Trial
Probiotic trials to date:
#preventNEC
Jacobs S E et al. Pediat rics. 2013
ProPrems Trial
ProPrems Trial
#preventNEC
Jacobs S E et al. Pediat rics. 2013
*Secondary outcome of trial; primary outcome late-onset sepsis
PiPS Trial
#preventNEC
Costeloe et al. Lancet . 2016
- Phase 3, multicenter trial of infants born between 23 to
30 weeks gestation in 24 UK hospitals.
- Intervention started as soon as possible after
randomization, regardless of feeding.
#preventNEC
Costeloe et al. Lancet . 2016
PiPS Trial
#preventNEC
Costeloe et al. Lancet . 2016
Cumulative meta-analysis
Patel and Underwood. S em Ped S
- urg. 2018
#preventNEC
Summary of meta-analysis
Patel and Underwood. S em Ped S
- urg. 2018
#preventNEC
Summary of meta-analysis
Patel and Underwood. S em Ped S
- urg. 2018
#preventNEC
Current use of probiotics in US
#preventNEC
Based on a 2015 survey, 70 (14%) US NICUs were supplementing probiotics to very low birth weight infants
Viswanathan et al. J Perinat ol. 2016
Use of probiotics worldwide
#preventNEC US 14%
- f NICUs
Viswanathan et. al. J Perinatol. 2016
Canada 21%
- f infants
<29 weeks’ GA
Singh et. al.
- Pediatrics. 2019
UK 12%
- f NICUs
Duffield & Clarke. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018
Germany 68%
- f NICUs
Denkel et al. PLoS One. 2016
Differences by strain
#preventNEC
Alfaleh et al. Cochrane Dat abase. 2014
Effect on risk of NEC Stage II+ by strain:
- Lactobacillus:
RR 0.45 (0.27-0.75)
- Bifidobacterium:
RR 0.48 (0.16-1.47)
- Sacchromyces boulardii:
RR 0.72 (0.34-1.55)
- Combination (2 or more):
RR 0.37 (0.25-0.54) Test for subgroup differences: P=0.48
Conclusions
#preventNEC
- The cumulative evidence from meta-analyses of
randomized trials demonstrates probiotics effectively reduce the risks of NEC, sepsis and mortality in preterm infants.
- Subgroup analyses do not show consistent
differences between treatment effects of combination vs. single strain preparations.
- However, some individual trial data provide
conflicting results, potentially from differences in preparations used.
Probiotics
Product choices and quality considerations
Mark Underwood MD UC Davis
Disclosures: Abbott (speakers bureau) Avexegen (advisory board) IBT (chair DSMB) Evolve (support for clinical trial) Probiotics are not approved by the FDA for the treatment, mitigation or prevention of any disease
How to choose a probiotic
S
ingle organism vs combination?
Include a prebiotic glycan? Purity and viability?
Single strain or combination?
8 RCTs of a Bif idobact erium plus a Lact obacillus +/ - a
S t rept ococcus strain: RR 0.41 (0.25, 0.66)
5 RCTs of a Lact obacillus species alone: RR 0.63
(0.39, 1.03)
5 RCTs of a Bif idobact erium species alone: RR 0.53
(0.22, 1.26)
Comparisons of a multi-strain and a single-strain
probiotic would be valuable
Thomas JP , Acta Paediatr 2017
Prebiotics
Galacto-oligosaccharide Fructo-oligosaccharide Inulin Lactulose Human milk oligosaccharides S
tudies to date of prebiotics alone have not shown decrease in NEC or death
Many of the probiotic trials have shown better
NEC reduction with the combination of probiotic + human milk
Purity and viability
S
everal studies have shown significant concerns about both purity and viability
Only 1 product of 14 tested contained the exact species stated on the
- label. 7 of the probiotic combinations contained all of the
microorganisms that were specified on the label, but had additional microbial constituents as well. 5 of the products were missing 1 species claimed on the label. -Marcobal A, JPGN 2008
Only 1 of the 16 products tested exactly matched the bifidobacterial species claims on the label in every sample tested. S
- me products were
not internally consistent as both pill-to-pill and lot-to-lot variation were observed. -Lewis ZT , Pediatr Research 2016
Combination products: Infloran
Currently B. infant is plus L. acidophilus
RCTs
Lin 2005, 367 infants: Probiotic 1.1% Placebo 5.3%
Lin 2008, 434 infants: Probiotic 1.8% Placebo 6.5%
Cohort studies
Hoyos 1999, 2510 infants: Probiotic 2.7% Control 6.6%
Hartel 2014, 5351 infants: Probiotic 3.1% Control 4.9%
Repa 2015, 463 infants: Probiotic 7.0% Control 10.3%
Guthmann 2016, 1224 infants: Probiotic 1.4% Control 2.1%
Denkel 2016, 10,890 infants: Probiotic 1.7% Control 3.4%
S amuels 2016, 1961 infants: Probiotic 5.1% Control 7.8%
Raj put 2017, 252 infants: Probiotic 0% Control 1.6%
Escribano 2018, 516 infants: Probiotic 13.3% Control 5.9%
Combination products: Ultimate Flora Baby
Currently B. breve, B. bif idum, B. longum, B.
inf ant is and L. rhamnosus
Produced under good manufacturing practice
(GMP) in Canada
Cohort studies
Janvier 2014, 611 infants: Probiotic 5.4%Control 9.8% S
ingh 2019, 2956 infants: NEC [aOR 0.52 (0.31, 0.87)], mortality [aOR 0.34 (0.20, 0.56)], and composite outcome
- f NEC or mortality [aOR 0.34 (0.22, 0.52)]
Combination products: ABC Dophilus
Currently B. bif idum, B. inf ant is, and S
. t hermophilus
RCTs
Bin-Nun 2005, 144 infants: Probiotic 1.4% Placebo 13.9% Jacobs 2013, 1099 infants: Probiotic 2.0% Placebo 4.4%
This product was taken off the market
following a death from a fungal contaminant, but is now available again
S ingle organism probiotics: L reut eri
Produces a variety of bacteriocins
Decreases gut inflammation
Improves gut motility
Meta-analysis of 6 RCTs (1778 preterm infants): significant improvement in time to full feeds, length of NICU stay, and late-onset sepsis, trends towards decreased NEC and death
2 cohort studies (665 preterm infants): decreased NEC
Probiotics in the U.S . containing pure L. reut eri
Biogaia Protectis (meets GMP requirements in Canada) Gerber S
- othe
Infant Bacterial Therapeutics has completed a phase 2 multi- center trial of a strain of L. reut eri under IND oversight by the FDA (they are looking for sites for the phase 3 trial) Athalye-Jape G, 2016, JPEN
S ingle organism probiotics: L. rhamnosus GG
Large amount of research in adult diseases RCTs
Dani 2002, 585 infants: Probiotic 1.4% Placebo 2.8% Manzoni 2006, 80 infants: Probiotic 2.6% Placebo 7.3% Awad 2010, 90 infants: Probiotic 0% Placebo 16.7%
Cohort studies
Luoto 2010, 2318 infants: 4.5% Control 3.2% Dang 2015, 263 infants: Probiotic 1.6% Control 5.9% Kane 2018, 640 infants: Probiotic 16.8% Control 10.2%
S ingle organism probiotics: B. inf ant is
Consumes all structures of human milk
- ligosaccharides (best colonizer)
Decreases NEC in animal studies S
uppresses inflammation
Decreases gut permeability Probiotics in the U.S
. containing pure B. inf ant is
Natren Life S
tart
Evivo
No clinical trials or RCTs of B. infant is alone in
preemies
Found in many combination products
S ingle organism probiotics: B. inf ant is
RCT trial in term breast fed infants S tart S top Frese S A, 2017 mS phere
S ingle organism probiotics: B. breve
- B. breve M16V
RCTs
Wang 2007, 66 infants: Probiotic 0% Placebo 0% Patole 2014, 159 infants: Probiotic 0% Placebo 1.2%
Cohort studies
Y
amashiro 2010, 564 infants: Probiotic 0% Control 2.7%
Patole 2016, 1755 infants: Probiotic 1.3% Control 3.0%
- B. breve BBG-001
RCT
Costeloe 2015, 1310 infants: Probiotic 9.5% Placebo 10%
Conclusion
More studies of combination probiotics have shown benefit than single organism probiotics, head to head comparisons are needed
“ No intervention comes close to probiotics when it comes to significant reduction in death, NEC, LOS and feeding intolerance at a cost of less than a dollar a day irrespective of the setting and baseline incidence of NEC” -Athalye-Jape, 2019 Microb Biotechnol
Probiotics
and the Perspectives of
Parents
Variability in care
Lack of information Views, concerns, and questions
- ften disregarded
“Why didn’t probiotics even
come up in conversation? My friend’s baby at a different hospital received probiotics.”
“If they aren’t telling me
about probiotics, what else aren’t they telling me?”
Are probiotics safe?
Lack of FDA approval Lack of dosing/ usage
guidelines
Variable product quality “How do you know
probiotics won’t hurt my baby?”
Access to interventions
Inequitable S
tifling
Unacceptable “If this can help
protect my baby’s health, why aren’t we using it?”
“Parents need more information. More information prepares us for our journey ahead and enables us to better care for
- ur baby.”
Empower parents
More
information
Mentor
families
“I wanted to be part of my baby’s
care team, but I didn’t know how.”
Engagement strategies
Build trust and rapport Empathetic
communication
Multimedia
communication
Provide rationale More information as
early as possible
“I wanted to be part of the decision- making process. I knew I would live with the consequences of these decisions for a lifetime.”
NEC Society Resources
NEC Prevention Through Collaboration
NEC Society Resources
Probiotics & Human Milk
Questions & Discussion
Please use the chat box