Presentation to the Bail Blue Ribbon Commission August 16, 2018 A - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation to the bail blue ribbon commission august 16
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Presentation to the Bail Blue Ribbon Commission August 16, 2018 A - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Presentation to the Bail Blue Ribbon Commission August 16, 2018 A perspective from Denver and Weld County Pretrial Services Programs Denver /Weld Pretrial Services Overview Greg Mauro, Director Denver Community Corrections Doug Erler,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Presentation to the Bail Blue Ribbon Commission August 16, 2018

A perspective from Denver and Weld County Pretrial Services Programs

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Denver /Weld Pretrial Services Overview

Greg Mauro, Director Denver Community Corrections Doug Erler, Director Weld County Justice Services Department

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Denver implemented actuarial risk assessment and the use of a risk informed pretrial supervision model in 2012.

2012

Colorado Pretrial Assessment Tool (CPAT) Implemented Ontario Domestic Abuse Risk Assessment (ODARA) Implemented Risk Informed Supervision Matrix Established

2013

Revised Colorado Bail Statute

2014-2017

Denver Smart Pretrial Demonstration Initiative

slide-4
SLIDE 4

While the number

  • f case filings

continues to rise, distributions within CPAT risk categories have remained consistent over time.

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Cat 1 Cat 2 Cat 3 Cat 4 Denver 2012 (N=1,817) 12% 39% 27% 22% Denver 2013 (N=8,035) 11% 38% 28% 23% Denver 2014 (N= 8,170) 13% 39% 28% 20% Denver 2015 (N=8,418) 11% 39% 29% 21% Denver 2016 (N=10,376) 11% 37% 29% 23% Denver 2017 (N=11,129) 11% 36% 28% 25%

Denver CPAT Assessment Information 2012-2017

slide-5
SLIDE 5

While the number

  • f case filings

continues to rise, distributions within CPAT risk categories have remained consistent over time.

Cat 1 Cat 2 Cat 3 Cat 4 2015 (N=2,920) 23% 46% 24% 10% 2016 (N=3,052) 23% 40% 25% 12% 2017 (N=3,426) 22% 42% 23% 13% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%

Weld County CPAT Assessment Information 2015-2017

slide-6
SLIDE 6

With continued collaboration and education on pretrial justice issues, Denver’s non-monetary release types has steadily increased, reaching a high

  • f 58% in August
  • f 2017.

5% 7% 20% 20% 36% 48%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

*Beginning in 2015, PR rate includes in custody misdemeanor weekend advisement in courtroom 2300

Percentage of Felony PR Bonds Granted 2012-2017

Risk Assessment Implemented HB 13-1236 Smart Pretrial Improvements DA at First Advisement

slide-7
SLIDE 7

In Weld County, the percentage

  • f pretrial

releases on Personal Recognizance increased from 32% in 2014 to 39% in 2017.

32% 42% 37% 39%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 2014 2015 2016 2017

Percentage of Cases with PR Bonds Granted 2014-2017

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Denver Pretrial Services Investigation Unit completes a bond report on all assessed defendants, which includes a recommendation regarding pretrial

  • supervision. The

decision matrix was updated in 2016 and is part of the current Pretrial Judicial Order.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

As the emphasis

  • n money based

systems declines, the Denver pretrial supervised population has continued to increase.

9% 11% 50% 25% 5%

Ordered Supervision Levels 2017

No Supervision Administrative Enhanced Intensive with Monitoring Maximum

N=9139

953 1315 1715 1964 2364 2375 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Denver County Pretrial Services Program supervised Average Daily Population (ADP)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The Weld County pretrial supervision population has also continued to increase.

Weld County Pretrial Services Average Daily Population (ADP)

Supervision Levels (2017)

885 871 979 800 820 840 860 880 900 920 940 960 980 1000 2015 2016 2017 21% 43% 23% 13%

Monitored Basic Enhanced Intensive

N=2,871

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Denver Pretrial supervision program success rates continue to correlate to pretrial CPAT risk scores

Cat 1 Cat 2 Cat 3 Cat 4 2013 90% 81% 68% 58% 2014 90% 78% 68% 55% 2015 92% 77% 64% 48% 2016 88% 72% 56% 46% 2017 90% 72% 55% 45% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Denver Supervision Outcomes by CPAT Category 2013- 2017

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Weld County pretrial supervision success rates continue to correlate to pretrial CPAT risk scores.

Cat 1 Cat 2 Cat 3 Cat 4 2015 84% 69% 61% 45% 2016 88% 73% 56% 45% 2017 84% 70% 55% 47% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Weld County Supervision Outcomes by CPAT Category 2015-2017

2015 2016 2017

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Weld County performance

  • utcomes.

Court Appearance Rate by CPAT Category 2015-2017 Public Safety Rate by CPAT Category 2015-2017

Cat 1 Cat 2 Cat 3 Cat 4 2015 90% 83% 79% 77% 2016 92% 85% 79% 81% 2017 88% 81% 78% 78% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2015 2016 2017 Cat 1 Cat 2 Cat 3 Cat 4 2015 95% 86% 83% 68% 2016 86% 88% 76% 65% 2017 96% 90% 77% 69% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2015 2016 2017

slide-14
SLIDE 14

CPAT Validation Project

Collaboration between the University of Northern Colorado and seven (7) Pretrial Services programs in Colorado – Boulder, Denver, Garfield, Larimer, Mesa, Pueblo and Weld

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The CPAT Validation Project validated the CPAT in its current form.

 Project leads, Dr. Victoria Terranova and Dr. Kyle Ward’s research retroactively validated the current CPAT indicating the tool is working well; however, suggested that its predictive performance might be improved since its original inception.  In the project’s next phase, a modified CPAT will be piloted in the seven (7) participating counties.  The final phase will be implementing a revised CPAT, training and judicial education.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

What is working ?

 Increased movement towards and acceptance on the use of pretrial risk assessment  Data availability / informed stakeholder discussions  Pretrial Services program collaborations  Local innovations

slide-17
SLIDE 17

What could be improved?

 Preventive Detention  Pretrial Assessment and Supervision Services in rural areas  Training, Training, and more Training  Continued reliance on charge-based financial bail/bond schedules  Lack of consistency ($ amounts) of bail/bond schedules  Treatment for defendants

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Thank you.

Questions?

 Greg Mauro, greg.mauro@denvergov.org  Doug Erler, derler@co.weld.co.us