presentation overview
play

Presentation Overview Wha t is E duc a tio n L a w 3020-a Be fo - PDF document

Update on Education Law Sections 3020 a and 3020 b Discipline of Tenured Teachers and Administrators Pre se nte d b y: 1 Sha ron N. Be rlin, E sq. Howa rd M. Mille r, E sq. L a mb & Ba rno sky, L L P Bo nd, Sc ho e ne c k


  1. Update on Education Law Sections 3020 ‐ a and 3020 ‐ b Discipline of Tenured Teachers and Administrators Pre se nte d b y: 1 Sha ron N. Be rlin, E sq. Howa rd M. Mille r, E sq. L a mb & Ba rno sky, L L P Bo nd, Sc ho e ne c k & K ing , PL L C . 1 With Spe c ia l T ha nks to Na tha nie l J. Kuzima , E sq., Joe l C. Moore , E sq., Je ffre y D. Hone ywe ll, E sq. for allowing us to use and to update the ir mate r ials. Presentation Overview • Wha t is E duc a tio n L a w § 3020-a • Be fo re the Cha rg e s • Se ttle me nt Stra te g ie s • Cha rg e s • E a rly Stra te g ie s & I ssue s • He a ring • Odds & E nds • E duc a tio n L a w § 3020-b 1

  2. Basics of 3020 ‐ a E duc a tio n L a w Se c tio n pro viding te nure d te a c he rs a nd • a dministra to rs with the rig ht to a he a ring b e fo re b e ing disc ipline d. • Ne e d “just c a use ” • Gro unds fo r disc ipline inc lude : 1. Insub o rdina tio n, immo ra l c ha ra c te r o r c o nduc t unb e c o ming a te a c he r, 2. Ine ffic ie nc y, inc o mpe te nc y, physic a l o r me nta l disa b ility, o r ne g le c t o f duty, o r 3. F a ilure to ma inta in c e rtific a tio n • Be mindful o f F irst Ame ndme nt re ta lia tio n c la ims a nd disc rimina tio n c la ims. Build a Record – Evaluation Tools/Process • T he Counse ling L e tte r Test is whether a stranger (e.g., hearing officer) reading the letter a year or more later will know what happened, why it was wrong and what were the District’s expectations of the employee. • Counse ling Se ssion with E mploye e • APPR E valuations for T e ac he r s and Pr inc ipals • valuations (no n-APPR e mplo ye e s) – Pe r for manc e E sho uld b e c o nduc te d b y dire c t supe rviso rs a nd do c ume nte d. E mplo ye e s ma y ha ve the rig ht to re spo nd pursua nt to the CBA. 2

  3. Build a Record – Investigate Employee Misconduct • Rig ht to Unio n Re pre se nta tio n E mplo ye e must b e info rme d in writing prio r to the o me e ting tha t the inte rvie w ma y re sult in disc ipline Ma y a djo urn me e ting to a c c o mmo da te unio n o re pre se nta tio n Wha t if e mplo ye e re q ue sts a tto rne y re pre se nta tio n? o • Unde r E duc a tio n L a w § 3020-a , the e mplo ye e ha s a rig ht to re ma in sile nt. But, the re a re e xc e ptio ns. Build a Record – Witness Interviews • F ir st: Doc ume nt Complaint/ Obtain and Pr e se r ve any E vide nc e (inc luding ma ke sure c o mpla int is in writing , sc re e n sho t so c ia l me dia po sts, g a the r vide o , re c o rding s, e tc .) • Inte r vie w Witne sse s/ Complainant (E mploye e s) – o Ma ke no pro mise s re : a c tio n to b e ta ke n. o Co nduc t individua l no t g ro up inte rvie ws. o Ma ke no sta te me nts a b o ut a c c use d's c ha ra c te r, jo b pe rfo rma nc e , e tc . o De te rmine wha t c o mpla ina nt wa nts. o Wha t to do with a witne ss who re fuse s to c o o pe ra te . • vie w Stude nts – no t le g a lly re q uire d, b ut yo u ma y wa nt to Inte r o b ta in pa re nta l c o nse nt/ invo lve me nt. • Disc uss with Counse l whe the r to take Witne ss State me nts. • Ke e p in mind that all doc ume nts will be disc ove r able . 3

  4. Build a Record – Interview Subject of Investigation Rig ht to Unio n Re pre se nta tio n • Che c k CBA fo r Additio na l • Pro c e dure s Pursua nt to E duc a tio n L a w § 3020-a , • the e mplo ye e ha s a rig ht to re ma in sile nt (c o mmo nly re fe rre d to b y e mplo ye e s a s (“ Cade t rig hts ”). But, the re a re e xc e ptio ns. Settlement Strategies Co nside ra tio ns: • o I s the se ttle me nt pre -Cha rg e s o r po st-Cha rg e s? o Pe na lty a sse ssme nt fa c to rs: • Se rio usne ss o f o ffe nse • L e ng th o f se rvic e • Any prio r misc o nduc t • I f the e mplo ye e ha s a lre a dy b e e n disc ipline d fo r this sa me type o f misc o nduc t • Ho w simila r misc o nduc t ha s b e e n ha ndle d b y the Distric t in the pa st o I f c o nduc t invo lve s a c rime – sho uld the Distric t wa it fo r c rimina l c ha rg e s o r a Pa rt 83 he a ring ? 4

  5. Drafting Charges • Ne e d to b e spe c ific , b ut do n’ t “o ve rc ha rg e ” o r a lle g e fa c ts tha t yo u c a nno t pro ve . Be wa re o f va g ue c a te g o rie s (i.e ., • inc o mpe te nc e , misc o nduc t, e tc .) tha t do no t ha ve sta tuto ry e le me nts. • Cha rg e s must b e b ro ug ht within thre e ye a rs o f the o c c urre nc e , e xc e pt whe n the c ha rg e is misc o nduc t tha t c o nstitute d a c rime whe n c o mmitte d. De te rmine d b y ma jo rity vo te in e xe c utive • se ssio n, he ld during the e mplo ye e ’ s re g ula r wo rk ye a r. • Co nside r timing – diffic ult to g e t witne sse s o ve r the summe r. Early Strategies & Issues – Hearing Officers Ava ila b ility o f g o o d He a ring Offic e rs • • Pa ying He a ring Offic e rs • Ba c kg ro und/ c o lle a g ue s’ e xpe rie nc e s with c e rta in He a ring Offic e rs 5

  6. Early Strategies & Issues – Pre ‐ hearing Motions Disc o ve ry unde r the ne w rule s – g e tting mo re fro m • the e mplo ye e • Mo tio ns in L imine Co nfide ntiality c o nside ratio ns – ha ndling re q ue sts • fo r pe rso nne l a nd stude nt file s • Co nside r se ttle me nt be for e the he aring 3020 ‐ a Hearing • E mplo ye e ha s the rig ht to : o A re a so na b le o ppo rtunity to de fe nd him/ he rse lf o An o ppo rtunity to te stify o n his/ he r o wn b e ha lf o Re pre se nta tio n b y c o unse l o T o sub po e na a nd c ro ss-e xa mine witne sse s o Disc o ve ry issue s with stude nt witne sse s 6

  7. 3020 ‐ a Hearings – Some Things To Know Ne w pro c e dure : • T he he ar ing must be c omple te d and a de c ision r e nde r e d within 155 days (5 months) of the pr e fe r r al of the c har ge s. • Pub lic o r priva te he a ring – up to the e mplo ye e • T e stimo ny is unde r o a th Co mplia nc e with the te c hnic a l rule s o f e vide nc e is • no t re q uire d 3020 ‐ a Hearing – Recent Amendments Suspe nsions without pay – c a nno t inc lude “o the r • b e ne fits a nd g ua ra nte e s” a nd c a nno t la st lo ng e r tha n 120 da ys ings – 10 da ys rule • “Pr obable Cause ” he ar • – se t a t pre -he a ring Disc ove r y by the e mploye r c o nfe re nc e Child witne sse s – tho se le ss tha n 14 ye a rs o f a g e • ma y te stify via a live , two -wa y c lo se d-c irc uit T V • E xpe dite d he ar ings for alle gations of c hild abuse nme nts – g e ne ra lly c a nno t e xte nd the • Adjour he a ring b e yo nd 60 da ys 7

  8. Hearing – Standard Employee Defenses L a c k o f “c a use ” • • Pro c e dura l de fe nse s • L a c k o f “no tic e ” – “I didn’ t kno w I c o uldn’ t do tha t” • L a c k o f “he lp” • Pe rso na lity c o nflic t Se le c tive disc ipline de fe nse – “e ve ryo ne e lse • do e s this a nd it’ s o ka y” • F a ilure to fo llo w APPR o r the de fe nse o f g o o d e va lua tio ns Hearing – Progressive Discipline • T he He a ring Offic e r ma y c o nside r the e xte nt to whic h the Distric t ma de a n e ffo rt to c o rre c t the e mplo ye e ’ s b e ha vio r o Re me dia tio n o Pe e r I nte rve ntio n o E mplo ye e Assista nc e Pla n (E AP) Pe na ltie s inc lude : • o Writte n Re prima nd o F ine ($) o Suspe nsio n Witho ut Pa y o Dismissa l o Re me dia l a c tio n – e .g ., le a ve o f a b se nc e with o r witho ut pa y, c o ntinuing e duc a tio n/ study, c o unse ling , me dic a l tre a tme nt 8

  9. 3020 ‐ a Charges – District Success Rate I n a T e a c he r Disc ipline Surve y c o nduc te d b y • NYSSBA in 2016, it wa s re po rte d tha t with re g a rds to 3020-a pro c e e ding s initia te d sinc e Oc to b e r 1, 2014 - o 57.5% (23 c a se s) re sulte d in te r mination/ dismissal ; o 15% (6 c a se s) re sulte d in suspe nsion without pay ; o 20% (8 c a se s) re sulte d in a fine ; o 15% (6 c a se s) re sulte d in a wr imand . itte n r e pr o In only T WO (2) r e por te d c ase s for this time pe r iod we r e all c har ge s/ spe c ific ations dismisse d by the He ar ing Offic e r . (Altho ug h in 15% o f c a se s so me c ha rg e s/ spe c ific a tio ns we re dismisse d.) Post ‐ Decision Timeline Within 15 days o f re c e ipt o f the • He a ring Offic e r’ s de c isio n, the Bo a rd must imple me nt the de c isio n E mplo ye e ha s 10 days a fte r re c e ipt • o f the de c isio n to ma ke a n a pplic a tio n to a ppe a l Co urt’ s re vie w is limite d to : 1. F inding s o f c o rruptio n, fra ud o r misc o nduc t; 2. Pa rtia lity o f the He a ring Offic e r; 3. He a ring Offic e r e xc e e de d his/ he r po we r; 4. F a ilure to issue a fina l a nd de finite a wa rd. 9

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend