predicting central venous
play

Predicting Central Venous Central venous stenosis is a significant - PDF document

ASDIN 7th Annual Scientific Meeting Background Predicting Central Venous Central venous stenosis is a significant Re-stenosis problem in hemodialysis patients Incidence has been reported 25-40% Amy Dwyer, MD Associate Professor of


  1. ASDIN 7th Annual Scientific Meeting Background Predicting Central Venous • Central venous stenosis is a significant Re-stenosis problem in hemodialysis patients • Incidence has been reported 25-40% Amy Dwyer, MD Associate Professor of Medicine Director, Interventional Nephrology Kundu, Journal of Vascular Access , 2010 University of Louisville Oguzurt, Euro J Radiol , 2005 MacRae, ASAIO , 2005 Barrett, Nephrol Dial Transplant . 1988 Schwab, Kidney Int . 1988 Background Hypothesis • Central venous stenosis has poor long-term patency rates after balloon angioplasty • Demographic and intervention factors can be used to predict re-stenosis after balloon angioplasty for central vein stenosis angioplasty for central vein stenosis. Reference 1 month 6 months 6 months 12 months Lumsden, Cardiovas Surg, 1997 84% 17% 42% Haage, Radiology , 1999 84% 56% 28% Bakken, J Vasc Surg , 2007 76% 21% 45% Nael, J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2009 81% 46% 22% Methods Data Collected • Retrospective chart review • Demographic factors • Hemodialysis treatment data • Age • Race • Venous Pressure 3 mo prior to PTA • 38 ESRD patients identified who had • Sex • Arterial Pressure 6 mo after PTA • Kt/V received central vein angioplasty received central vein angioplasty • Patient history • Medications • PTA data • Co-morbidities • June 2005 through January 2009 • Severity of stenosis • Access type • Residual stenosis • Access age • Balloon size • Followed for 6 months after central vein PTA • # Prior access • Time to re-intervention • # Prior catheters 1

  2. ASDIN 7th Annual Scientific Meeting Patient Demographic Data Statistical Analysis Characteristic No Re-stenosis Re-stenosis N= 29, (%) N= 9, (%) Sex Male 10 (34.4) Male 6 (66.6) Age (years) 55.1 54.2 • Prediction of re-stenosis was evaluated by AA 25 (86.2) AA 7 (77.7) Race Caucasian 2 (6.9) Caucasian 2 (22.2) cox-proportional hazards analysis. Hispanic 1 (3.4) Hispanic 0 Arteriovenous fistula Arteriovenous fistula 26 (89 6) 26 (89.6) 5 (55.5) 5 (55 5) DM 11 (37.9) 6 (66.6) HTN 26 (89.6) 9 (100) Peripheral vascular disease 2 (6.9) 1 (11.1) Congestive heart failure 7 (24.1) 1 (11.1) Coronary artery disease 5 (17.2) 2 (22.2) Cerebral vascular event 1 (3.4) 1 (11.1) 7 (24.1) 3 (33.3) Aspirin Clopidogrel 1 (3.4) 0 Wafarin 3 (10.3) 2 (22.2) Results Results Table 2. Covariates used in analysis of re-stenosis rate Table 2. Covariates used in analysis of re-stenosis rate Variable No Re-stenosis Re-stenosis Variable No Re-stenosis Re-stenosis (N = 29) (N = 9) (N = 29) (N = 9) Hemoglobin (gm/dl) Hemoglobin (gm/dl) 11.0 12.1 11.0 12.1 3 months prior to PTA 3 months prior to PTA 11.5 12.2 11.5 12.2 6 months after PTA 6 months after PTA Venous Pressure (mm Hg) Venous Pressure (mm Hg) 216.0 216 0 247.9 247 9 216 0 216.0 247 9 247.9 3 months prior to PTA 3 th i t PTA 3 3 months prior to PTA th i t PTA 224.6 243.9 224.6 243.9 at time of PTA at time of PTA 234.6 226.3 234.6 226.3 6 months after PTA 6 months after PTA Arterial Pressure (mm Hg) Arterial Pressure (mm Hg) -173.3 -192.2 -173.3 -192.2 3 months prior to PTA 3 months prior to PTA -193.7 -203.1 -193.7 -203.1 at time of PTA at time of PTA -220.3 -189.7 -220.3 -189.7 6 months after PTA 6 months after PTA kt/v kt/v 1.57 1.61 1.57 1.61 3 months prior to PTA 3 months prior to PTA 1.64 1.60 1.64 1.60 at time of PTA at time of PTA 1.60 1.63 1.60 1.63 6 months after PTA 6 months after PTA Results • Average difference in venous pressure 3 months prior to the initial intervention • 216 mmHg in the no re-stenosis group 216 mmHg in the no re stenosis group • 248 mmHg in the re-stenosis group (p=0.041) Figure 1. Kaplan- Meier plot of venous pressure plotted as two groups divided at the mean pressure for all subject. Subjects with a mean venous pressure less than 223 mmHg 3 months prior to the initial intervention had a decreased rate of re-stenosis during the 6 month follow up period (p=0.041). 2

  3. ASDIN 7th Annual Scientific Meeting Results Conclusion • If Venous Pressure was < 186 mm Hg, no • We conclude that high venous pressure one developed re-stenosis. three months prior to central vein balloon angioplasty is predictive of re-stenosis • The risk of re-stenosis increased 17% for The risk of re stenosis increased 17% for within 6 months. every 10 mmHg increase in venous pressure. Acknowledgements • Robert Murithi, MD • Anand Patel, MD • George Aronoff, MD • Michael Brier, PhD 3

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend