Possible nuclear structure issues for nucleosynthesis Yang Sun - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

possible nuclear structure issues for nucleosynthesis
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Possible nuclear structure issues for nucleosynthesis Yang Sun - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Possible nuclear structure issues for nucleosynthesis Yang Sun Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China EMMI-JINA workshop, Oct. 10-12, 2011 Major scientific facilities in China HIRFL-CSR, Lanzhou LAMOST, Xinglong Observatory near Beijing Heavy Ion


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Possible nuclear structure issues for nucleosynthesis

Yang Sun

Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China

EMMI-JINA workshop, Oct. 10-12, 2011

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Major scientific facilities in China

HIRFL-CSR, Lanzhou Heavy Ion Res Facility + Cooling Storage Ring LAMOST, Xinglong Observatory near Beijing Multi-Object Fiber Spectroscopic Telescope SSRF, Shanghai Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility CSNS, Dongwan of Guangdong Province Chinese Spallation Neutron Source

slide-3
SLIDE 3

HIRFL-CSR: Beam facilities

slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • End of 2007: test run
  • End of 2008: 1st physics run
  • Fall of 2009: results

RIBLL2+CSRe Isochronous mass spectrometer

36Ar→RIB 78Kr→RIB

CSRe: Cooling storage ring

slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8

How much the tiny nuclear structure changes can influence the nucleosynthesis results?

slide-9
SLIDE 9

¢ Masses of these nuclei are

measured for the first time.

¢ Current HIRFL-CSR results

have similar error bars as CDE predictions.

¢ It confirms that CDE

method is reliable at least for 63Ge, 67Se.

¢ It shows some differences

for 65As and particularly for

71Kr.

Mass measurement results

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Difference in binding energy of mirror nuclei Binding energy of the proton-rich nucleus Binding energy of the neutron-rich nucleus D(A,T) calculated with Skyrme Hartreee-Fock method

Coulomb displacement energy (CDE)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

吸积盘

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Important factors for a nuclear structure model calculation

¢ Single particle states (mean field part)

l Reflect shell structure (spherical, deformed) l Adjust to experiment

¢ Two-body interactions (residual part)

l Mix configurations (do not have in mean field models) l Transition probabilities are sensitive test

¢ Model space (configurations)

l Large enough to cover important parts of physics l If not possible, introduce effective parameters

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Ongoing projects

¢ Two shell model studies

l Projected shell model (for well-deformed nuclei) l Large-scale spherical shell model (for near-spherical nuclei) ¢ Structures of neutron-rich nuclei l r-process interests ¢ Structures of proton-rich nuclei near the N=Z line l rp-process interests ¢ Structure of heavy, stable nuclei l s-process interests

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Energy spectrum for 55Fe: A projected shell model calculation

¢ Projected shell model calculation for 55Fe energy levels

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Spherical shell model with core- excitations

¢ Magic nature of 132Sn has recently been confirmed by Jones et al.

Nature 465 (2010) 454.

¢ Spectroscopy of valence nuclei with one particle in empty shells or

  • ne hole in completely filled shells provides direct information on

single-particle structure.

¢ Spectroscopy of nuclei with two particles or two holes provides

information on correlations between different kinds of pairs.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Shell model calculation considering particle-hole excitations show features supporting magnetic rotation bands.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

In some nuclei, different shapes are known to co- exist near ground state. Nuclear shape coexistence leads to shape isomeric states (excited states having relatively long lifetimes).

Question of shape effect

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Nuclear isomers

¢ Bethe (1956): “An excited nuclear state which endures

long enough to have a directly measurable lifetime is called an isomeric state.”

¢ Isomeric states occur because, to match the states to

which it decays, it is difficult for a nucleus

l to change its shape (shape isomer) l to change its spin (spin trap isomer) l to change its spin orientation relative to an axis of symmetry

(K-isomer)

¢ These states may behave like new nuclei in the

reaction network.

Walker and Dracoulis, Nature 399 (1999) 35

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Energies levels of 68Se and 72Kr

Bouchez et al, PRL (2003)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Isomer influence on abundances in X-ray burst

¢ It is possible that a flow towards higher mass through the

isomer branch can occur (calculations using multi-mass- zone x-ray burst model)

l Y. Sun, J. Fisker, M. Wiescher, et al., Nucl. Phys. A758 (2005) 765

Without any possible isomer contribution Full flow through isomers rather than g.s.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

β-decay & electron-capture in stars

¢ Stellar weak-interaction rates are

important for resolving astrophysical problems

l for nucleosynthesis calculations l for core collapse supernova modeling

¢ Calculation of transition matrix

element

l essentially a nuclear structure problem l necessary to connect thermally excited

parent states with many daughter states

l for both allowed and forbidden GT

transitions

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Stellar enhancement of decay rate

¢ A stellar enhancement can result from the thermal

population of excited states

¢ Examples in the s-process

( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

∑ ∑ ∑

− × + − × + = ⎟ ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ × =

m m m i i i i j ij i

kT E I kT E I p p / exp 1 2 / exp 1 2

β β

λ λ

  • F. Kaeppeler,
  • Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 43 (1999) 419
slide-23
SLIDE 23

B(GT) and logft in 164Ho à 164Dy

Z.-C. Gao, Y. Sun, Y.-S. Chen, PRC 74 (2006) 054303

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Nuclear matrix elements (future)

¢ To calculate quantities relevant to reactions, realistic

many-body wave functions are needed. ﹤ A+1,I’ | a+ | A,I﹥, ﹤ A+2,I’ | a+ a+ | A,I﹥

¢ Preferably the wave functions are eigenstates of angular

momentum and particle number, contain sufficient structure information in initial and final states.

¢ To perform shell model calculations and obtain the wave

functions, one needs good

l single-particle states l effective interactions l algorithms to construct shell model configurations

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Summary

¢ Tiny nuclear structure changes may influence

nucleosynthesis results

l Example in nuclear mass calculations l Example with nuclear shape isomer

¢ Reliable shell model calculations for decay and nucleon-

capture rates are needed

l Workable models for any size of nuclei, deformed or spherical

l Spectrum description is a crucial test for those models ¢ Particular nuclear structure changes may be more interesting l Deformation effect l Sudden changes in shell structure l Nuclear isomers