Port Lands Flood Protection Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting #3 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
port lands flood protection stakeholder advisory
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Port Lands Flood Protection Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting #3 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jun 03, 2023 48 likes •852 views

Port Lands Flood Protection Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting #3 August 21, 2018 What are we building? 4 Earthworks/Flood Protection 5 Bridges and Structures Roads and Municipal Services 7 Parks 8 Where are we now? Where are we now?

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Port Lands Flood Protection Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting #3 August 21, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

What are we building?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Earthworks/Flood Protection

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Bridges and Structures

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Roads and Municipal Services

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Parks

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Where are we now?

9

Where are we now?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Where are we now?

Feb 2018

Port Lands Flood Protection (PLFP) Community consultation #1

May 2018

Design river, parks, roads & bridges is 30% complete

July 2018

PLFP community consultation #2

Fall 2018

River excavation begins Design for parks & river is 50% complete Design complete on Cherry Street & Cherry Street Bridge North

Spring 2019

Design for parks & river is 60% complete

Fall 2019

Design for Commissioners Street is complete

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Key Design Milestones

May 2018

Design river, parks, roads & bridges is 30% complete

August 2018

Design for roads is 60% complete

Fall 2018

River excavation begins Design for parks & river is 50% complete Design complete on Cherry Street & Cherry Street Bridge North

Spring 2019

Design for parks is 60% complete Design for river is 90% complete

Fall 2019

Design for Commissioners Street is complete

slide-12
SLIDE 12

13

Construction Progress

slide-13
SLIDE 13

14

slide-14
SLIDE 14

15

slide-15
SLIDE 15

16

slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28
slide-29
SLIDE 29
slide-30
SLIDE 30
slide-31
SLIDE 31
slide-32
SLIDE 32
slide-33
SLIDE 33
slide-34
SLIDE 34
slide-35
SLIDE 35
slide-36
SLIDE 36
slide-37
SLIDE 37
slide-38
SLIDE 38
slide-39
SLIDE 39
slide-40
SLIDE 40
slide-41
SLIDE 41
slide-42
SLIDE 42
slide-43
SLIDE 43
slide-44
SLIDE 44
slide-45
SLIDE 45
slide-46
SLIDE 46
slide-47
SLIDE 47
slide-48
SLIDE 48
slide-49
SLIDE 49
slide-50
SLIDE 50
slide-51
SLIDE 51
slide-52
SLIDE 52
slide-53
SLIDE 53

Where are we now?

54

Port Lands Flood Protection and Enabling Infrastructure Roads and Municipal Infrastructure

SAC # 3 August 21, 2018 Prepared by WSP with files from DTAH

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Where are we now?

55

Network of Streets

slide-55
SLIDE 55
slide-56
SLIDE 56

Where are we now?

57

Design Vision

slide-57
SLIDE 57
slide-58
SLIDE 58

Where are we now?

59

Design Approval Schedule

slide-59
SLIDE 59
slide-60
SLIDE 60

Where are we now?

61

Cherry Street Cross Section

slide-61
SLIDE 61
slide-62
SLIDE 62
slide-63
SLIDE 63

Where are we now?

64

Public Realm

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Public Realm Concept for New Cherry Street

slide-65
SLIDE 65
slide-66
SLIDE 66

Where are we now?

67

Community Consultation #2 Feedback on Cycle Tracks

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Separation of cyclists from traffic

68

  • Physical barrier seen as most important
  • Higher barriers (e.g. planters) prioritized, followed by curbs/medians and lastly

elevation

  • People noted it's important that high planters don’t obstruct visibility

Separation of cyclists from pedestrians

  • Physical barrier preferred
  • Consider wheelchair access if using curbs or planters
  • People are open to alternatives in the event of space and cost constraints
  • Combination of visual cues (texture, colour, signage) preferred to account for

weather and different user needs

  • Pavement markers – would like both separating lines and markers
  • Consider maintenance/longevity
slide-68
SLIDE 68

Regulating speed within cycling zones

69

  • People recommend separating slow and fast cyclists

Transition zones

  • People noted that textured surfaces should be limited on cycling paths
  • People asked for cues that are consistent with treatments elsewhere in the city
  • Colour is preferred over texture, though many people note that neither is clear

enough in the precedent images shown

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Where are we now?

70

Cherry Street Design

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Cherry Street from Lake Shore to Keating Channel

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Cherry Street from Keating Channel to Commissioners Street

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Cherry Street from Commissioners to Polson Street

slide-73
SLIDE 73

Where are we now?

74

Intersection of Cherry and Commissioners Streets

slide-74
SLIDE 74

Intersection: Cherry Street and Commissioners Street

slide-75
SLIDE 75

Where are we now?

76

Cherry Street Rail Underpass

slide-76
SLIDE 76
slide-77
SLIDE 77

Where are we now?

78

Potential Innovations

slide-78
SLIDE 78
slide-79
SLIDE 79
slide-80
SLIDE 80

Questions for Consideration

81

#1 - Do you feel the proposed design preserves the important aspects of the heritage building or structures in the project area? What aspects do you feel are most important to preserve? #2 - Do you feel the current design for Cherry Street addresses your previous request to consider the clear delineation of space? Is there any user group (pedestrian, cyclist, transit rider, driver) you feel is not well served by the current design? Why?