Polysilicon MEMS sensors: sensitivity to sub-micron imperfections - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

polysilicon mems sensors sensitivity to sub micron
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Polysilicon MEMS sensors: sensitivity to sub-micron imperfections - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Polysilicon MEMS sensors: sensitivity to sub-micron imperfections Aldo Ghisi, Marco V. Geninazzi, Stefano Mariani aldo.ghisi@polimi.it 2 Engineering motivations o Polycrystalline silicon microstructures o d grain d structure scattering in


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Polysilicon MEMS sensors: sensitivity to sub-micron imperfections

Aldo Ghisi, Marco V. Geninazzi, Stefano Mariani aldo.ghisi@polimi.it

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • A. Ghisi et alii.

Polysilicon MEMS sensors: sensitivity to sub-micron imperfections

Engineering motivations

  • Polycrystalline silicon

microstructures

  • dgrain≈dstructure

scattering in the elastic properties

  • offset in operating devices
  • electronics compensation, causing

performance reduction

  • investigation on elastic behavior

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • A. Ghisi et alii.

Polysilicon MEMS sensors: sensitivity to sub-micron imperfections

Suspension spring stiffness: finite element simulations

  • Two‐dimensional problem
  • Si grains with their own lattice
  • rientation
  • Voronoi tessellation of the

domain, Boolean operations, poly‐Si structure (1 µm grain diameter)

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • A. Ghisi et alii.

Polysilicon MEMS sensors: sensitivity to sub-micron imperfections

Suspension spring stiffness: finite element simulations

  • Two‐dimensional problem
  • Si grains with their own lattice
  • rientation
  • Voronoi tessellation of the

domain, Boolean operations, poly‐Si structure (1 µm grain diameter)

  • Mesh elements size 125 nm

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • A. Ghisi et alii.

Polysilicon MEMS sensors: sensitivity to sub-micron imperfections

Spring geometries analyzed (Monte Carlo simulations)

(a)Folded spring (b) 1/3 spring (c) Cantilever Dimensions: length of 200 μm or 300 μm; width of 2 μm or 3 μm.

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • A. Ghisi et alii.

Polysilicon MEMS sensors: sensitivity to sub-micron imperfections

Monte Carlo results: cumulative probability distributions for spring stiffness

12

  • 6
  • 1

2 1 2 ln 2

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • A. Ghisi et alii.

Polysilicon MEMS sensors: sensitivity to sub-micron imperfections

Homogenization procedure on Statistical Volume Elements (SVEs)

  • simulations on SVEs featuring random

grain orientation and morphology

  • Two SVE sizes: 2×2 μm and 3×3 μm
  • Bilateral bounds on the elastic properties

(, and through either uniform stress

  • r

uniform strain boundary conditions

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • A. Ghisi et alii.

Polysilicon MEMS sensors: sensitivity to sub-micron imperfections

2×2 μm SVE 3×3 μm SVE

Homogenization results

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • A. Ghisi et alii.

Polysilicon MEMS sensors: sensitivity to sub-micron imperfections

Analytical method to estimate the spring stiffness on the basis of the results at the SVE level

Young’s modulus is randomly extracted from the lognormal distributions and assigned to each beam portion

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • A. Ghisi et alii.

Polysilicon MEMS sensors: sensitivity to sub-micron imperfections

Comparison between FE and analytical results

1.475 10 / 1.478 10/

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • A. Ghisi et alii.

Polysilicon MEMS sensors: sensitivity to sub-micron imperfections

Results check: 1\ comparison with bounds and representative solutions

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • A. Ghisi et alii.

Polysilicon MEMS sensors: sensitivity to sub-micron imperfections

Results check: 2\ comparison between the estimated deformation modes

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • A. Ghisi et alii.

Polysilicon MEMS sensors: sensitivity to sub-micron imperfections

Stochastic offset estimation

Different stiffness of springs plus residual stresses can lead to an offset

  • f the seismic mass under rest conditions.

Offset () and resultant of the

residual stresses () are linked through: 2

  • where and are the two stiffness values.

11

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • A. Ghisi et alii.

Polysilicon MEMS sensors: sensitivity to sub-micron imperfections

Offset estimation

  • Random value drawn from the stiffness probability distribution
  • Random value drawn from the residual stresses distribution

(assumed as a normal one with mean 10 MPa and standard deviation 1.67 MPa)

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • A. Ghisi et alii.

Polysilicon MEMS sensors: sensitivity to sub-micron imperfections

Offset estimation

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • A. Ghisi et alii.

Polysilicon MEMS sensors: sensitivity to sub-micron imperfections

Conclusions

  • stiffness of polycrystalline silicon springs investigated through FE analyses.
  • homogenization on SVE elastic properties to assess the statistical distribution

due to the random microstructure.

  • analytical method based on beam bending fed by the statistical distribution

devised to compute the stiffness of polysilicon suspension springs.

  • method applied for offset estimation in statically indeterminate structures.
  • Future

developments: comparison with experimental data; deeper investigation (and estimation) of residual stresses; accounting for the effects of

  • veretch defects.

16