Policy Pitches From evidence to policy Pitch #1 Manuela Samek - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
policy pitches
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Policy Pitches From evidence to policy Pitch #1 Manuela Samek - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nov 23, 2022 332 likes •1.12k views

Policy Pitches From evidence to policy Pitch #1 Manuela Samek Lodovici Istituto per la Ricerca Sociale Knowledge economy, high skilled labour mobility and territorial disparities Regions, KE and economic conditions Future CP should focus

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Policy Pitches

From evidence to policy

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Pitch #1

Manuela Samek Lodovici

Istituto per la Ricerca Sociale

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Knowledge economy, high skilled labour mobility and territorial disparities

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Regions, KE and economic conditions

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Future CP should focus on supporting development in lagging areas and territorial cohesion

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Valorise local assets, provide services & infrastructure of general interest, support capacity building

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Pitch #2

Bernd Schuh

Österreichisches Institut für Raumplanung

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Analysing distribution

and performance of SMEs

in European regions, and proposing territorial development strategies

slide-9
SLIDE 9

SMEs are the backbone of the European economy: to understand their performance, you need to take into account the territorial structures of the labor market and the different enterprise size-classes

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Regional SME Typology : Combination of SME performance and territorial context

Micro enterprises 1-9 employees SMEs 10-249 enterprises

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Tailor-made solutions for unique regions – policy interventions have to respect place and governance

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Encourage the Quadruple Helix approach – involve economy, academia, administration and people

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Target start-ups and scale- ups separately

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Think skills & competences rather than sector policies

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Julien Grunfelder

Nordregio

Pitch #3

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Non-European owned firms in Europe

  • n average:
  • employ 5 times as many people
  • produce 11 times as much
  • generate 9 times as much value added

as local firms

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Broader effects Ongoing attraction of FDI Signaling and branding Larger local markets Direct effects Indirect effects Induced effects Purchases from European subcontractors Wages spent in Europe Wages spent in Europe Productivity spillovers

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Productivity spillovers

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Analysis and recommendations based on data from

52,061 Extra-European FDI projects 102,500 non-European

  • wned firms in

Europe Key characteristics

  • f 1,7 m local

firms

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Clusters are among the most important regional drivers of FDI

Groups of related industries Existing strengths Inclusive clusters

International value chain positioning

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Special initiatives should support disadvantaged regions Cohesion policies can help attract FDI

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Pitch #4

Erik Gløersen

Spatial Foresight

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Fuzzy territorial cooperation = Communities of intent

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • Territorial cohesion 2.0
  • Functional areas revisited
  • Future of cohesion policy?
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Focus on capacity-building and facilitation

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Provide basic funding for stable, durable cooperation

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Reflect

  • n the roles
  • f public authorities

at different levels

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Pitch #5

Vanya Simeonova-van der Grift

Stichting Wageningen Research

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Spatial dynamics and strategic planning in metropolitan areas

slide-30
SLIDE 30

There is no one single definition of a metropolitan area …

...that matches both ongoing urbanization trends, current administrative borders or existing planning practices and perceptions of actors

slide-31
SLIDE 31

10 MAs

Brno Brussels Lille Lyon Oslo & Akershus Prague Terrassa Turin Vienna Zürich MDA method of delineation offers a tailor-made assessment of different spatial sales and key urban trends based on European and local data.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Key findings

  • 1. Effective metropolitan planning depends on a shared-governance

process that is closely linked with the administrative levels of statutory spatial planning, with clearly allocated competences between relevant governmental levels (vertically) and across policy sectors / departments / municipalities (horizontally).

  • 2. The formal status of the metropolitan areas is not a determining

factor for the effectiveness of the metropolitan planning and governance processes, though acceptance and recognition is essential

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Eight “action areas” for setting different foci in strategic, statutory and collaborative planning Metropolitan planning approach

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Redefining the metropolitan areas as clusters of administrative bodies within functional areas: understanding different delineating approaches at the EU scale

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Engaging political leaders and gaining support from all levels of governance: flexible planning systems and changing environment call for both strong leadership and broad involvement

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Pitch #6

Vincent Nadin

Technische Universität Delft

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Objective: to describe and explain changes in territorial governance and spatial planning systems since 2000

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Spatial planning is critical for more effective coordination and implementation of EU policies.

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Enormous variation 32 ESPON countries 7 additional countries Multiple systems in federal and regionalised countries

slide-40
SLIDE 40

More effective spatial planning and territorial governance for tackling unsustainable and uncoordinated development

Near Zagreb Croatia
slide-41
SLIDE 41

phase 1 structure processes phase 2

  • peration

performance evaluation research design conceptual equivalence Informal institutions diachronic approach – evolution expert opinion phase 3 case studies challenges, good practice desk study + expert focus groups/interviews

Quality control & validation

synthesis & policy

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Avoid spatial blindness - understand the relations between spatial planning and cohesion policy

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Avoid costs of non- coordination - direct cohesion policy interventions through the spatial planning system

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Monitor effectiveness - provide an interactive platform on the influence of EU policy on spatial planning

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Pitch #7

Joan Noguera

University of Valencia

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Develop strategies for inner peripheries to

  • vercome their

marginalising effects

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Perfect combination for IP: low economic potential, poor access to SGIs & weak “organised proximity”

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Inner Peripherality in Europe, 2017

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Connectivity & territorial capital to facilitate neo- endogenous development

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Shaping “intangible factors” to bring change and reverse “spiraling- down” processes

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Overcome limited views and realize the potential of IPs to serve as “laboratories”

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Pitch #8

Kevin Broughton

Coventry University

slide-53
SLIDE 53

We did research on how regional/local authorities are doing ‘EU2020’ economic development

slide-54
SLIDE 54

From ‘government’ To ‘governance (with government)’ From managerial planning To spatial planning From general vision spatial governance To instrumental solution territorial governance From few stakeholders To many, diverse stakeholders

Changes, challenges and opportunities in regional governance

From stability and funding for regionalisation To uncertainty, change, austerity and increased centralisation

slide-55
SLIDE 55
slide-56
SLIDE 56

Our advice is to broker / mediate ‘project relevant alliances’ – move from authority to facilitator.

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Our advice is to design strategies ‘flexible’ to implementation and funding realities.

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Our advice is to develop soft structures: trust- based relations in place

  • f statutory relations.
slide-59
SLIDE 59

Our advice is to navigate ‘sectorial v territorial’ challenges – e.g. by becoming a ‘living lab’.

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Pitch #9

Bernd Schuh

Österreichisches Institut für Raumplanung

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Regions´ transition to a low-carbon economy (LCE) – focus on energy

slide-62
SLIDE 62

This research shows regions' energy consumption, renewable and governance potentials

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Wind onshore, change in installed capacity in 2012-2002, MW/km2

Increase of wind energy generation took place in regions with high and very high potential Contrastingly, PV generation shows dynamic development mainly in less privileged solar regions, hardly any change in areas with high solar potential

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Key advice

  • Regions need appropriate governance powers in issues like

renewable energy, low-carbon transport and energy efficiency.

  • Local-regional cooperation is key for effective LCE transition.
  • Ensure broad involvement of public sector, private business,

academia and civil society in the transition process.

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Tailor EU + national level legal/aid frameworks to renewables and energy efficiency

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Increase the impact of Cohesion Policy: integration with relevant policy fields for low-carbon economy (such as in RTD and Energy)

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Pitch #10

Kai Böhme

Spatial Foresight

slide-68
SLIDE 68

What might the European territory look like in 2030?

slide-69
SLIDE 69

What if:

  • Circular economy
  • 100% renewable energy
  • Property markets collapse

Territorial Foresight actions:

  • Framing the topics
  • Fact finding
  • Participatory process
  • Exposures & sensitivities

Results:

  • Territorial foresight guide
  • Europe today & tomorrow
  • Foresight reports
slide-70
SLIDE 70

Our advice is to pay more attention to the territorial implications of (nice) policy objectives

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Place-based circular economy

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Our advice is to engage people in territorial foresight any admin. level & topic

slide-73
SLIDE 73

Our advice is to consider the territorial dimension beyond what is in the data

slide-74
SLIDE 74
slide-75
SLIDE 75

Vote on the policy recommendations to be adopted/implemented as a priority!

slide-76
SLIDE 76

Vote on the policy recommendation that would have the most significant impact in your region!

slide-77
SLIDE 77

Vote on the most inspirational pitch!

slide-78
SLIDE 78

Policy Pitches