Policies for a Rising Bay Project Economic Interests Meeting July 15, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

policies for a rising bay
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Policies for a Rising Bay Project Economic Interests Meeting July 15, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Policies for a Rising Bay Project Economic Interests Meeting July 15, 2015 Project Goal Collaboratively evaluate BCDCs fill policies in light of sea level rise and develop guidance for the Commission, sta ff and project proponents to


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The

Policies for a Rising Bay

Project

Economic Interests Meeting July 15, 2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Project Goal

Collaboratively evaluate BCDC’s fill policies in light

  • f sea level rise and develop guidance for the

Commission, staff and project proponents to promote shoreline resilience

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Jurisdiction

Bay 100-ft shoreline band* Salt ponds & managed wetlands Certain waterways

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Within shoreline band in priority use areas, proposed use must be consistent with the designation and be consistent with all applicable policies.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Authority in upland areas

the Commission may deny an application for a proposed project on the grounds that the project fails to provide maximum feasible public access, consistent with the proposed project, to the Bay and its shoreline.

(McAteer-Petris Act §66632.4)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Different policies apply depending

  • n jurisdiction and proposed project
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Commission’s approach to economic issues

  • “Develop the Bay and its shoreline to their highest

potential with a minimum of Bay filling.” Bay Plan Objective 2

  • Water-oriented uses in designated priority use areas,

e.g., ports, airports, water-related industry, wildlife refuges, and water-oriented recreation

  • Benefit-detriment analysis during permit review,

including consideration of whether a certain threshold of activity is necessary for viability of the project

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Example: AT&T Park

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Example: Brooklyn Basin

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Example: Dredging

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Policy Analysis

How does the minimum fill requirement affect applicant’s ability to protect existing and future infill development?

(McAteer-Petris Act 66605(c))

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Policy Analysis

How to encourage innovative sea level rise adaptation approaches?

(Bay Plan Climate Change Policy 5)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Policy Analysis

How to implement cost-effective adaptive management plans for adaptation actions?

(Bay Plan Climate Change Policy 3)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Policy Analysis

What is reasonable mitigation for flood protection projects? Would a plan-based regional approach to flood protection fill and mitigation be more economical?

(Bay Plan Mitigation Policy 1)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Policy Analysis

How should the Commission consider fill to elevate ground transportation serving as flood protection?

(Bay Plan Transportation Policy 1)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Additional questions, comments, and concerns?