Planning the Lean Effort Planning the Lean Effort Before Investing - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

planning the lean effort planning the lean effort before
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Planning the Lean Effort Planning the Lean Effort Before Investing - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Planning the Lean Effort Planning the Lean Effort Before Investing in Automation Before Investing in Automation and New Facilities and New Facilities John F. Chapman, Dr. P.H, DABCC, FACB Professor, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Planning the Lean Effort Planning the Lean Effort Before Investing in Automation Before Investing in Automation and New Facilities and New Facilities

John F. Chapman, Dr. P.H, DABCC, FACB Professor, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine Director, Core Laboratory, Clinical Chemistry and Point of Care Testing UNCH UNC Hospitals Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline for Presentation Outline for Presentation

  • Who we are
  • Why we chose Lean
  • The Lean process and progress
  • The Lean-automation connection
  • Afterthoughts
slide-3
SLIDE 3

UNC Health Care UNC Health Care

61,200 ED Visits 741,980 Outpatient Visits 22,347 Surgical Cases 31,296 Inpatient Visits 5,769 FTEs 680 Resident Physicians 1,188 Attending Physicians 708 Licensed Beds 100+ Specialties 4 Hospitals (soon to be 5)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

UNC Health Care Affiliated UNC Health Care Affiliated Enterprises Enterprises

Chatham Primary Care Chatham Crossing Pittsboro Family Medicine Durham Family Medicine Highgate Family Medical Center UNC Health Care North Carolina Lions Diabetic Eye Care Center UNC Family Practice Center Four County Primary Care UNC Specialty Women’s Center University Pediatric Surgeons Sanford Specialty Clinics University Pediatrics University Internal Medicine University Obstetrics and Gynecology Rex Hospital

slide-5
SLIDE 5

UNC Health Care UNC Health Care

slide-6
SLIDE 6

UNC Hospitals Core Lab Laboratory UNC Hospitals Core Lab Laboratory

Blood Gas Chemistry Coagulation Hematology TDM/Toxicology Urinalysis/Body Fluids

slide-7
SLIDE 7

UNC Hospitals Core Lab Laboratory UNC Hospitals Core Lab Laboratory

Vital Statistics: Vital Statistics:

4.9 Million tests reported (2006-2007) 15-20% STAT 5-6% average annual increase 60% Inpatient, 40% Outpatient $14.3M budget 78 FTE

By most measures an efficient, cost By most measures an efficient, cost-

  • effective laboratory

effective laboratory

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Pressures for Change Pressures for Change

Reduce FTEs

CORE LABORATORY

Increase Revenue Increase Capacity Enhance Quality Decrease Costs No additional Space Further Further Automation ?? Automation ?? Improve TAT

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Why Pressure to Automate? Why Pressure to Automate?

  • Vigorous marketing campaigns

– Vendor-sponsored demonstrations for hospital administrators

  • Attractive cost-benefit projections

– Bundling automation with IVD systems

  • One-time capital cost
  • Ongoing personnel cost savings
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Automation Realities

ADVANTAGES ADVANTAGES

  • Reduce need for manual

activities – Enhanced safety – Reduced mislabeling – Automatic storage and retrieval

  • Reduce FTEs

DISADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES

  • Throughput is often a

compromise – Rack and queue (most current Systems) – Reduced flexibility

  • High (often hidden)

maintenance and renovation costs

  • Objective determination of

best automation product / configuration is difficult

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Automation Realities Automation Realities

“Orderly processes, when operated in an environment of disorder, will still be subject to error .” – J.O. Westgard “Automation is like a hammer – you can do good or bad things with it .” – Mark Graban

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Reasons for Implementing Lean

  • Proven approach for planning facility

improvements and expansion

  • Most effective way to meet our needs to:

– Remove waste – Optimize processes – Improve patient care service – Improve financial performance

  • Create a Lean environment PRIOR to

expanding automation

  • Use Lean tools and data to evaluate the impact

and value of automation components

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Lean Project Implementation Lean Project Implementation

  • Established a “Lean” team to:

– Collect and analyze data – Suggest recommendations for improvement

  • Formed a Lean Steering Committee to:

– Provide Leadership Commitment – Gain Budget Approvals – Facilitate organizational and staff buy-in

  • Began 20-Week Project
slide-14
SLIDE 14

UNC Hospitals Lean Team UNC Hospitals Lean Team

  • Six-Member Lean Team

– Senior Technologist, Core Lab – Core Technical Specialist – 2 Core Technologists – Phlebotomy Supervisor – Microbiology Supervisor

  • Lean Steering Committee

– Core Laboratory Director – Core Laboratory Assistant Administrative Director – Director McLendon Clinical Laboratories – Administrative Director McLendon Clinical Laboratories – Facillity Support Supervisor – CQI Specialist

  • Lean Senior Consultant
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Lean Project Goals Lean Project Goals

  • Core Lab - Phlebotomy - Micro CPA

– Eliminate Waste – Improve Turnaround Times – Meet capacity demands without additional personnel – Determine most efficient laboratory layout and design – Define areas of opportunity for further enhancing productivity/safety/error reduction through automation

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Tools and Data to Shape the Future Tools and Data to Shape the Future State State

Lean Future State

Cellular Layout Performance Measures Standard Work (Job Guidance) Activity of the Product Group Technology Activity of the Operator

=

DATA DESIGN

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Analyze Product Process Flow Analyze Product Process Flow

  • Videotape the product moving through the

process from start to finish

  • Break down the activity of the product into

distance traveled and time spent in:

– Storage – Value added processing – Non-value added processing

  • Examples: Transportation, Inspection
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Activity of the Product Activity of the Product

Current Product Process Flow

TOTAL STORAGE TIME 52.3% TOTAL NON-VALUE ADDED TIME 2.4% TOTAL VALUE ADDED TIME 45.3%

CHEMISTRY

0:00:00 UA 0:00:00 Coag 0:00:00 Heme 0:19:19 Chem 0:30:12 SP 0:00:00 Phleb

Activity of the Product by Department / Area Description

Time Dept

0:00 0:07 0:14 0:21 0:28 0:36 0:43 0:50 0:57

Phleb SP Chem Heme Coag UA

Hour:min:sec Seconds 0:49:31 2971

1 WAIT IN TUBE STATION

4:20:30 4:24:15

B 0:03:45 225

2 MOVE TO BUCKET

4:24:21

T 0:00:06 6

3 WAIT IN BUCKET

4:29:18

B 0:04:57 297

4 MOVE TO PROCESSING BENCH

4:29:22

T 0:00:04 4

5 WAIT ON BENCH

4:29:43

B 0:00:21 21

6 RECEIVE IN LAB

4:29:50

VA 0:00:07 7

7 MOVE TO RACK

4:29:59

T 0:00:09 9

8 WAIT IN RACK

4:31:40

B 0:01:41 101

9 MOVE TO CF

4:31:48

T 0:00:08 8

10 WAIT IN CF

4:32:00

B 0:00:12 12

11 BE CENTRIFUGE

4:40:51

VA 0:08:51 531

12 MOVE TO FUSION RACK

4:41:16

T 0:00:25 25

13 WAIT IN FUSION RACK

4:50:42

B 0:09:26 566 STEP

DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY

  • Alt. Start

Time (optional)

TOTAL

Input Actual Time

(on camera)

FLOW CODE

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Product travel distances are excessive.

Activity of the Product Activity of the Product

Olympus Olympus

Distances between departments leads to batching

  • f specimens and therefore long storage times.
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Analyze Activity of the Operator Analyze Activity of the Operator

  • Videotape the tech moving through the process

from start to finish (minimum 5 cycles)

  • Break down the activity of the operator into

distance traveled and time that is:

– Value Added – Required Waste – Pure Waste

slide-21
SLIDE 21

254 DOCUMENT ON LABEL MAN 255 PUT DOWN PEN TL 256 DISCARD LABELS MAN 257 PICK UP REQ PAPER 258 OPEN ORDER SCREEN COMP 259 MOVE LABEL PAPER 260 ENTER INFORMATION INTO LIS COMP 261 TEAR OFF LABELS FROM PRINTER MAN 262 RECEIVE SAMPLES IN LAB COMP

16 2 2 2 8 1 58 1 4

351 MOVE TO RT 1 BENCH WK

10

Routine Processor

Activity of the Operator Activity of the Operator

Analysis of Operations Summary Of Current Work Required Waste: 94% Value Added: 1% Pure Waste: 5%

Analysis of Operations Summary of Current Required Waste Material Handling: 2.7% Inspect: 6.0% Walk: 2.8% Other: 6.5% Paper: 17.8% Cycle Machine: 0.3% Manual Operation: 18.7% Tools: 6.5% Parts: 10.3% Computer: 28.5%

slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Designing the Layout Designing the Layout

  • Design a layout giving prime location to highest

volume analyzers

  • Set up core structure that will contain >90% of

high volume tests and lower volume critical tests

  • Design layout in a cellular formation to achieve

efficient walk patterns and flexibility in number of operators

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Represents 97.94%

  • f the Test Volume

in the Core Lab! Represents the remaining 2.06%

  • f the Test

Volume in the Core Lab.

Designing the Layout Designing the Layout

Group Technology Data

slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Operator Walk Pattern: Future State Operator Walk Pattern: Future State

Fusion Fusion Fusion

ADVIA ADVIA

Elecsys Elecsys ECi ECi ECi

Olympus ACL Tops ACL Tops ACL Tops Olympus

CELL Specimen Processing

OE 1 OE 5 OE 4 OE 3 OE 2

slide-27
SLIDE 27

What Have We Done So Far? What Have We Done So Far?

Specimen Processing Specimen Processing

  • Design a layout

– to enhance FIFO sample flow and processor flexibility and create optimal walk patterns

  • Design Standard Work

– to eliminate wasted space and effort and enhance specimen throughput

  • Create new positions

– to interface specimen processing work cells activities and promote single piece flow

slide-28
SLIDE 28

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Minutes Chemistry Coagulation Hematology Urinalysis Pre-Lean Post Lean

Impact of Lean Impact of Lean

Mean Sample Wait Time in Processing Mean Sample Wait Time in Processing

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Collected to Received Interval

Collected to Received Time Interval by % Samples Collected to Received Time Interval by % Samples Collected to Received Time Interval by % Samples Collected to Received Time Interval by % Samples

0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00% 40.00% 45.00% K CBC APTT TRPT

PRE-LEAN POST-LEAN

5 10 15 20 25 >25 5 10 15 20 25 >25

Minutes Minutes

slide-30
SLIDE 30

% Routine Results Reported Within Each Time Period

0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00% 100.00%

60 min 120 min 180 min 240 min 60 min 120 min 180 min 240 min

PRE-LEAN POST-LEAN

K CBC APTT TRPT UA Cocaine

In-Lab Turnaround-Time

(Received to Reported)

slide-31
SLIDE 31

In-Lab Turnaround-Time

(Received to Reported)

% STAT Results Reported Within Each Time Period

0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00% 100.00% K CBC APTT TRPT UA Cocaine

PRE-LEAN POST-LEAN

30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min 30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Potential Staffing Efficiencies Potential Staffing Efficiencies Post Post-

  • Lean

Lean

Standard Work Practices Match Process Cycle Times to Reflect Workload Level Individual Workloads Redistribute Staffing Assignments to More Closely Match Workflow Patterns

1 PICK UP CARRIER AT TUBE STATION PT 2 2 0:00:02 2 OPEN CARRIER MAN 2 4 0:00:04 3 REMOVE SAMPLES FROM CARRIER PT 2 6 0:00:06 4 CLOSE CARRIER MAN 1 7 0:00:07 5 PUT CARRIER IN TUBE STATION MAN 2 9 0:00:09 6 SEND CARRIERS CYCLE 2 11 0:00:11 7 MOVE TO OE BENCH MH 5 16 0:00:16 8 DROP OFF SPECIMENS PT 2 18 0:00:18 9 WALK TO TUBE STATION WK 5 23 0:00:23 10 PICK UP CARRIER AT TUBE STATION PT 2 25 0:00:25

CODE ESTIMATE

Analysis Information (Process Type & Estimated Time)

DESCRIPTION OF JOB CONTENT JOB STEP

Cumulative Operator Time

Seconds Hr:Min:Sec

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Potential Staffing Efficiencies Potential Staffing Efficiencies Post Post-

  • Lean

Lean

Standard Work Practices Match Process Cycle Times to Reflect Workload Level Individual Workloads Redistribute Staffing Assignments to More Closely Match Workflow Patterns

Assessment of Hourly Specimen Workload

100 200 300 400 1 3 5 7 9 1 1 1 3 1 5 1 7 1 9 2 1 2 3 Time of Day

N u m b er o f S p ecim en s

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Potential Staffing Efficiencies Potential Staffing Efficiencies Post Post-

  • Lean

Lean

Standard Work Practices Match Process Cycle Times to Reflect Workload Level Individual Workloads Redistribute Staffing Assignments to More Closely Match Workflow Patterns Pre-Lean Configuration 2 stat processors 3 routine order entry 1 aliquoter 1 rover Post Lean Configuration 5 order entry 1 aliquoter 1 distributor

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Potential Staffing Efficiencies Potential Staffing Efficiencies Post Post-

  • Lean

Lean

Standard Work Practices Match Process Cycle Times to Reflect Workload Level Individual Workloads Redistribute Staffing Assignments to More Closely Match Workflow Patterns

Lean Staff Analysis-Specimen Processing

2 4 6 8 1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 Time Number of FTE's Pre-Lean Staff Post-Lean Staff

Assessment of Hourly Specimen Workload

100 200 300 400 1 3 5 7 9 1 1 1 3 1 5 1 7 1 9 2 1 2 3 Time of Day

N u m b er o f S p ecim en s

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Lean as a Path to Automation Lean as a Path to Automation

What Lean Provides:

  • Optimized workflow and standardized

processes

  • Performance metrics that enable

continuous monitoring of processes and compilation of performance data

  • Data, Tools and the Mindset to evaluate

future changes

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Using Lean Data and Tools to Evaluate Using Lean Data and Tools to Evaluate Future Changes Future Changes

Centrifuge Demand by Hour

50 100 150 200 250

: 1 : 2 : 3 : 4 : 5 : 6 : 7 : 8 : 9 : 1 : 1 1 : 1 2 : 1 3 : 1 4 : 1 5 : 1 6 : 1 7 : 1 8 : 1 9 : 2 : 2 1 : 2 2 : 2 3 :

Time of Day Number of Specimens

# Specimens

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Using Lean Data and Tools to Evaluate Future Using Lean Data and Tools to Evaluate Future Changes Changes

Centrifuge (CF) Data Manual / Standard CF capacity (# of tubes) 86 Time to Load CF (min) 0.5 Time to Balance CF (min) 0.5 CF Spin Time (include ramp up and down) (min) 5.5 Time to Unload CF (min) 0.5 Total Time (min) / CF Cycle 7 # of Cycles / HR / Centrifuge 8.571428571 # of Centrifuges 2 # of Cycles / HR / Total 17.14285714 # Tubes Required/ CF Cycle 12.8 Automation 100 3 1 5.5 3 12.5 4.8 1 4.8 45.7 Automation 100 3 1 5.5 3 12.5 4.8 2 9.6 22.8 Automation 100 3 1 5.5 3 12.5 4.8 3 14.4 15.2 Automation 100 3 1 5.5 3 12.5 4.8 4 19.2 11.4

slide-39
SLIDE 39

What What’ ’s next? s next?

  • Utilize Lean tools and data to

provide objective answers for the following questions:

– Are there processes that still do not meet our productivity, quality of service and financial goals? – How would potential automated enhancements compare with current Lean state?

–Efficiency, throughput? –Flexibility? –Cost?

slide-40
SLIDE 40

We believe that starting with a Lean-state Laboratory and using Lean evaluation tools is the best way to make objective, data-driven decisions about the need for, and impact of, future automation strategies

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Management Things We did Management Things We did Well Well

  • Communication
  • Protected Lean Team function
  • Real-time metrics
slide-42
SLIDE 42

Tools and Data to Shape the Future Tools and Data to Shape the Future State State

slide-43
SLIDE 43
  • Communication!

– Achieving buy-in from management of all areas affected

  • Selection of Steering Committee

– Maximize clout!

  • Planning for future transfer of Lean

expertise

Management Things We Could Management Things We Could Have Done Better Have Done Better

slide-44
SLIDE 44

and, the BIGGEST and, the BIGGEST CHALLENGE CHALLENGE… …

Keeping it Going!!