Planning Commission Work Session: December 7, 2016 2016-17 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

planning commission
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Planning Commission Work Session: December 7, 2016 2016-17 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Planning Commission Work Session: December 7, 2016 2016-17 OFFICIAL DOCKET OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENTS ITEM A-10: Personal Social Events Presenter: Kraig Chalem, Associate Planner The terms personal, social, or


slide-1
SLIDE 1

2016-17 OFFICIAL DOCKET OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENTS

ITEM A-10: “Personal Social Events”

Planning Commission

Work Session: December 7, 2016

Presenter: Kraig Chalem, Associate Planner

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The terms ‘personal’, ‘social’, or ‘event’ are not defined by the Thurston County Code (TCC); but, “personal social event” is described in the “Temporary Use” section, as: “Properties rented or used for personal social events, such as, wedding receptions, private parties, or similar activities”.

  • Several complaints involving parking, noise, and duration of “personal social

events” have been reported.

  • The standard is perceived as overly inclusive and inadequate to protect nearby

residences.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

TCC 20.54.070(41.5) TCC 21.66.020(G)(f) TCC 22.56.290(B)(6)

**Standards for Olympia’s UGA are not affected by this review.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Better define, “personal events” by requiring properties “rented” for social

  • ccasions to obtain a ‘Special Use Permit’.

Pros:

  • Intended to preserve private gatherings for “personal” use; and
  • Clearly states when property used for generating income should obtain a

permit; and Cons:

  • Difficult to enforce.
  • Would require visual inspection during irregular hours.
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Move all “personal social events…” from “exempt” to requiring a ‘Special Use Permit’. Pros:

  • Would enable the county to better track the impacts of events.

Cons:

  • Difficult to enforce, would require visual inspection during irregular hours.
  • Does not provide relief for properties adjacent to those who may frequently

host events.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Better control “personal”, “social”, and “events” by developing standards that affect: duration (hours/days of operation), definition (event=one day), and/or verbiage (Personal events not rented or advertised to the general public; or, properties used for personal events no more than…) Pros:

  • More regulation better defines activities potentially subject to code

enforcement actions. Cons:

  • Would take time to educate public of changes to the rules.
  • Some property owners may feel that they are being treated unfairly.
  • Difficult to enforce, would require visual inspection during irregular hours.
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Following this evenings work session the Planning Commissioners may:

  • A. Direct staff to schedule a public hearing to receive public testimony;
  • B. Request that staff provide additional information based of direction from

the Commission, and schedule another work session; or

  • C. Direct staff to make specific changes, and schedule either a public

hearing, or additional work session.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Staff recommends Option-A as the preferred option, and to set a public hearing for, January 4, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. (or soon thereafter) to receive public testimony on proposed amendments regulating ‘Temporary-Personal and Social Events’.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

QUESTIONS?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

 Visit the webpage at:

www.co.thurston.wa.us/planning/docket/docket_home.htm

 Sign-up for email notifications at:

www.thurstonplanning.org

 Contact Staff via email: chalemk@co.Thurston.wa.us ; or,

phone: 360.867.2087

 View all news releases at:

http://www.co.thurston.wa.us/news_releases/index.asp

Stay Informed and Participate

Thank You