Plan 1. Introduction 2. The neutron interaction with magnetism 3. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

plan 1 introduction 2 the neutron interaction with
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Plan 1. Introduction 2. The neutron interaction with magnetism 3. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Plan 1. Introduction 2. The neutron interaction with magnetism 3. The Born Approximation 4. Elastic scattering 5. Bragg scattering 6. Neutron polarization analysis 7. Diffuse scattering INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN Neutrons and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Plan

  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. The neutron interaction with magnetism
  • 3. The Born Approximation
  • 4. Elastic scattering
  • 5. Bragg scattering
  • 6. Neutron polarization analysis
  • 7. Diffuse scattering
slide-2
SLIDE 2

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN 10 September 2005 A.R.Wildes

Neutrons and Magnetism

  • I. Elastic scattering of neutrons

Andrew Wildes Institut Laue-Langevin, Grenoble, France

slide-3
SLIDE 3

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

No time to present:

  • Sources
  • Techniques and instrumentation
  • Resolution
  • Analysis methods
slide-4
SLIDE 4

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

What do neutrons measure? Magnetization and the size of the magnetic moment per atom

the spatial distribution of magnetization

Magnetic correlations in space and time

magnetic structures, from Å to µm the influence of impurities, frustration on magnetism magnetic phase transitions and critical exponents

Energy states associated with magnetic electrons and dynamics

eigenstates of Hamiltonians magnetic exchange integrals crystal field transitions

Coupling between magnetic and chemical/structural properties

superconductivity colossal- and giant magnetoresistance magnetostriction and INVAR effect

slide-5
SLIDE 5

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Limitations of neutrons FLUX!

Measurements are limited by statistics. Normally have to compromise on resolution. It is difficult to measure < 0.1 µB per atom.

Neutrons interact with all the magnetic fields in the sample,

it can be difficult to separate different components.

Neutrons don’t measure spatial dimensions directly,

they measure in Fourier space. Conclusions are often model-dependent This is both a plus and a minus!

slide-6
SLIDE 6

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

The ‘Family Tree’ of Magnetism

slide-7
SLIDE 7

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

The properties of the neutron

Neutrons are matter waves.

  • They have a de Broglie wavelength of λ

(λ ~ 1.8 Å is a ‘standard’ for ‘thermal’ neutrons, but experiments can use ~ 0.1 to 100 Å neutrons)

  • They have a momentum of p = h/λ = hk

and a kinetic energy of E= h2/2mλ2 = h 2k2/2m

  • They have a magnetic dipole moment given by

(where is the Pauli spin operator)

  • The kinetic energy of a thermal neutron is about the same as

the energy of a lattice or magnetic vibration

σ ˆ

N

γµ − σ ˆ

slide-8
SLIDE 8

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

We must solve the Wave equation for the neutron/sample ensemble. is the potential energy operator. For neutrons it is called the Fermi pseudo-potential.

( )

( )

[ ]

ψ ψ E V M = + ∇ − r ˆ 2

2 2

h

ˆ V (r)

ˆ V r

( )= Vn r ( )+ Vm r ( )

Vn r

( )= 2πh2

mn b + Bˆ I ⋅ ˆ σ

( )

δ r

( )

Vm r

( )= −γµN ˆ

σ ⋅ B r

( )

where

b is the nuclear scattering length BÎ is the nuclear spin B(r) is the magnetic induction

The neutron interaction with magnetism

slide-9
SLIDE 9

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

We must solve the Wave equation for the neutron/sample ensemble. is the potential energy operator. For neutrons it is called the Fermi pseudo-potential.

ˆ V (r)

where

b is the nuclear scattering length BÎ is the nuclear spin B(r) is the magnetic field

magnetic!

The neutron interaction with magnetism

( )

( )

[ ]

ψ ψ E V M = + ∇ − r ˆ 2

2 2

h ˆ V r

( )= Vn r ( )+ Vm r ( )

Vn r

( )= 2πh2

mn b + Bˆ I ⋅ ˆ σ

( )

δ r

( )

Vm r

( )= −γµN ˆ

σ ⋅ B r

( )

slide-10
SLIDE 10

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Most neutron magnetic experiments are scattering experiments.

Q Neutron scattering

Incident neutrons with wavelength λ, wave vector k, (|k|=2π/λ) spin s Interaction with target Scattered neutrons with wave vector k´, spin s´ Constructive and destructive interference leads to peaks in the intensity as a function of: 1) the momentum transfer: Q = k − k´ 2) the energy transfer: ∆E = (h2 ⁄ 2m)(|k|2 − |k´|2) 3) the change in the neutron spin orientation

slide-11
SLIDE 11

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

( )

( )

ζ ζ ζ ζ ζ

ω δ ζ ζ π σ

′ ′ ′

− + ′ ′ ′ ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ ′ = ⋅ Ω

∑ ∑

E E s V s p p m k k E

s s s n

h h

2 , , 2 2 2

, , ˆ , , 2 d d d k k r Most neutron experiments are scattering experiments.

The Born approximation

The target volume is initially in state ζ. A neutron enters with wave vector k and spin s It interacts with the target. The final neutron wave vector is k´ and spin s´. The final target state is ζ ´. If the neutron has a plane wave function, if the interaction is weak, then the wave equation can be solved using first order perturbation theory, i.e. Fermi’s Golden Rule This is known as the cross-section, and gives the probability that a neutron will scatter in to a certain solid angle with a certain change in energy The two assumptions form the first Born approximation

slide-12
SLIDE 12

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

The cross-section

d2σ dΩ⋅ dE = ′ k k mn 2πh2 ⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎞ ⎠ ⎟

2

pζ ps

ζ ,s

′ k , ′ s , ′ ζ ˆ V r

( )k,s,ζ

′ ζ , ′ s

2

δ hω + Eζ − E ′

ζ

( )

  • G. L. Squires, Introduction to the theory of thermal neutron scattering, Dover Publications, New York, 1978
  • W. Marshall and S. W. Lovesey, Theory of thermal neutron scattering, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1971
  • S. W. Lovesey, Theory of neutron scattering from condensed matter, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1986

Conservation of energy Probabilities of initial target state and neutron spin The matrix element, which contains all the physics. Appropriate averaging over the target energy states, the positions r, and the neutron spin directions is necessary to find the measured cross-section

slide-13
SLIDE 13

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Forget about the spins for the moment and integrate over all r: Momentum transfer Q = k – k´

Elastic scattering

( ) ( )

r r r

r Q

d e V V

i

⋅ = ′

ˆ ˆ k k The elastic cross-section is then directly proportional to the Fourier transform squared of the potential. Neutron scattering thus works in Fourier space, otherwise called reciprocal space. Elastic neutron scattering is also referred to as neutron diffraction If the incident neutron energy = the final neutron energy, the scattering is elastic. dσ dΩ = mn 2πh2 ⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎞ ⎠ ⎟

2

ps ′ k , ′ s ˆ V r

( )k,s

′ ζ , ′ s

2

slide-14
SLIDE 14

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Fourier Transforms F(Q) =

f (r)eiQ⋅r ⋅ dr

f(r) F(Q)

A A a 1/a a A 1/a A×a a 1/a

A Delta function A series of Delta functions Two Delta functions A Gaussian

slide-15
SLIDE 15

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Vm(r), B(r) and the magnetization

( ) ( )

) ( ˆ ˆ Q B ⋅ − ⋅ − = ⋅

⋅ ⋅

∫ ∫

σ σ

N i N i m

d e d e V γµ γµ = r r B r r

r Q r Q

B(Q) is related to the magnetization of the sample, M(r), through the equation:

( ) ( )

( )

( )

Q M r Q r M Q Q B

r Q ⊥ ⋅

= ⋅ × × = ∫ d ei ˆ ˆ Neutron scattering therefore probes the components of the sample magnetization that are perpendicular to the neutron’s momentum transfer,Q. and Neutron scattering measures the correlations in magnetization, i.e. the influence a magnetic moment has on its neighbours. It is capable of doing this over all length scales, limited only by wavelength.

( )

) ( ) ( ) (

*

Q Q Q

⊥ ⊥ ⋅

= Ω = ⋅

M M M r r

r Q

d d d e V

magnetic i m

σ

slide-16
SLIDE 16

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Elastic scattering

( )

r r r r

r Q r Q

d e z V V d e V s V s p m

i i s s n

⋅ ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ − + ⋅ ∝ ′ ′ ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ = Ω

⋅ ⋅ ′ ′

∫ ∫ ∑

) ( ˆ ˆ ˆ , ˆ , 2 d d

2 2 2 2 , 2 2 ζ

π σ k k h

The contribution from the average structure of the sample: Long-range order The contribution from deviations from the average structure: Short-range order

slide-17
SLIDE 17

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Magnetic structure determination 1. Long-range structure

dσ dΩ ∝ ˆ V

2

eiQ⋅r ⋅ dr

Crystalline structures f(r) F(Q) Recall the Fourier transform from a series of delta-functions Bragg’s Law: 2dsinθ=λ Leads to Magnetic Crystallography

a 1/a

slide-18
SLIDE 18

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

MgB2 is a superconductor below 39K, and expels all magnetic field lines (Meisner effect). Above a critical field, flux lines penetrate the sample.

A simple example of magnetic elastic scattering

The momentum transfer, Q, is roughly perpendicular to the flux lines, therefore all the magnetization is seen. (recall )

) ( ) (

*

Q Q

⊥ ⊥

= Ω M M d d

magnetic

σ

k k´ Q k´ Scattering geometry 2θ

slide-19
SLIDE 19

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

A simple example of magnetic elastic scattering ~2°

Cubitt et. al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 047002 (2003) Cubitt et. al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 157002 (2003)

Via Bragg’s Law 2dsinθ=λ λ = 10 Å d = 425Å

The reciprocal lattice has 60° rotational symmetry, therefore the flux line lattice is hexagonal MgB2 is a superconductor below 39K, and expels all magnetic field lines (Meisner effect). Above a critical field, flux lines penetrate the sample.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

  • C. G. Shull & J. S. Smart, Phys. Rev. 76 (1949) 1256

Antiferromagnetism in MnO

300K (paramagnetic) Bragg peaks from crystal structure

slide-21
SLIDE 21

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

  • C. G. Shull & J. S. Smart, Phys. Rev. 76 (1949) 1256

New Bragg peaks

Antiferromagnetism in MnO

80K (antiferromagnetic) 300K (paramagnetic) Bragg peaks from crystal structure

slide-22
SLIDE 22

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Antiferromagnetism in MnO

  • C. G. Shull & J. S. Smart, Phys. Rev. 76 (1949) 1256

New magnetic Bragg peaks Crystal structure

a

Mn atom

slide-23
SLIDE 23

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Antiferromagnetism in MnO

  • C. G. Shull et al., Phys. Rev. 83 (1951) 333
  • H. Shaked et al., Phys. Rev. B 38 (1988) 11901
  • C. G. Shull & J. S. Smart, Phys. Rev. 76 (1949) 1256

New magnetic Bragg peaks Magnetic structure

a

slide-24
SLIDE 24

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Antiferromagnetism in MnO

  • C. G. Shull et al., Phys. Rev. 83 (1951) 333
  • H. Shaked et al., Phys. Rev. B 38 (1988) 11901
  • C. G. Shull & J. S. Smart, Phys. Rev. 76 (1949) 1256

New magnetic Bragg peaks Magnetic structure Magnetic unit cell

a 2a

slide-25
SLIDE 25

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Antiferromagnetism in Chromium Reciprocal space Real space a Spin Density wave

E.Fawcett, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60 (1988) 209

Chromium is an example of an itinerant antiferromagnet

a 1/a

(Recall the Fourier Transform for two Delta functions)

f(r) F(Q)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Magnetic structure of Holmium

  • W. C. Koehler, in Magnetic Properties of Rare Earth Metals, ed. R. J. Elliot (Plenum Press, London, 1972) p. 81
  • R. A. Cowley and S. Bates, J. Phys. C 21 (1988) 4113
  • A. R. Mackintosh and J. Jensen, Physica B 180 & 181 (1992) 1

Scan along [00l], incommensurate peaks Real space structures l (rlu)

Nuclear peak

slide-27
SLIDE 27

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

  • O. Zaharko et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 217206

The magnetic structure of Cu2Te2O5X2 (X=Cl, Br) A map in reciprocal space…leads to the structure in real space (complicated!)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

  • A. S. Oja and O. V. Lounasmaa, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69 (1997) 1

Nuclear magnetic order The nuclear magnetic phase diagram as a function of field at 60 nK

slide-29
SLIDE 29

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Polarized neutrons Q

+ +

d dσ Ω

− −

d dσ Ω

− +

d dσ Ω

+ −

d dσ

Non-spin flip Spin flip

One spin state comes in Arbitrary spin orientation at sample The spin orientation may change

  • n scattering

Four possibilities:

slide-30
SLIDE 30

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Polarized neutrons

s B b s s V s U s

s

σ Μ σ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ⋅ − ⋅ + ′ = ′ =

⊥ ′

I

( ) ( )

y x y x z z

iM M U iM M U M b U M b U

⊥ ⊥ + − ⊥ ⊥ − + ⊥ − − ⊥ + +

− − = + − = + = − =

( )

2 , 2 2

, ˆ , 2 d d

′ ′

′ ′ ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ = Ω

s s n

s V s p m

ζ

π σ k k r h

  • R. M. Moon, T. Riste and W. K. Koehler, Phys. Rev. 181 (1969) 920

z Neutron polarization coordinates: z is parallel to P

Neglect nuclear spin for the moment REMEMBER: the only visible components of the magnetization are PERPENDICULAR to Q

slide-31
SLIDE 31

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Q,P y z x Elastic scattering, P || Q

( )

( )

( )

( )

( ) ( )

[ ]

( )

∫ ∫ ∫

⋅ × = ⋅ ± − = Ω ⋅ = Ω

− ⋅ ⊥ ⊥ ⋅ ⊥ ⊥ ± ⋅ ± ±

⊥ ⊥

r r r r r r r r r r

r r Q r Q r Q

d e M M z i M M d e iM M d e b

j i

i j i j i i y x i * * 2 2

ˆ ) ( ) ( d d ) ( d d m

m

σ σ

  • The non-spin flip cross-sections have only nuclear components
  • The spin-flip cross-sections have only the magnetic components
  • There is a complete separation of nuclear from magnetic scattering.
  • The cross term in the spin flip cross-sections usually cancels,

i.e.

( )

( )

( )

( ) ( )

j i j i

M M M M r r r r

* *

⊥ ⊥

× − = ×

⊥ ⊥

slide-32
SLIDE 32

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

A polarization analysis measurement of α-Fe2O3

α-Fe2O3 is antiferromagnetic. Powder diffraction gives Bragg peaks with mixed nuclear and magnetic intensities non- spin flip spin flip Nuclear Bragg peaks Magnetic Bragg peaks

  • R. M. Moon, T. Riste and W. K. Koehler, Phys. Rev. 181 (1969) 920
slide-33
SLIDE 33

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Q Elastic scattering, P ⊥ Q P

( )

2 2

) ( d d ) ( ) ( d d

∫ ∫

⋅ ⊥ ± ⋅ ⊥ ± ±

= Ω = Ω r r r r r

r Q r Q

d e M d e M b

i y i z m

m σ σ

z x y

  • The non-spin flip cross-sections probe the components of the magnetization parallel

to the neutron polarization

  • The spin-flip cross-sections probe the components of the magnetization that are

perpendicular to both the polarization and to Q

  • There is a difference between the two non-spin flip cross-sections, the difference is

called nuclear-magnetic interference.

  • The two spin-flip cross-sections are equivalent
slide-34
SLIDE 34

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Polarized neutrons and ferromagnets

Single domain collinear ferromagnets have a magnetization that is always parallel to P. If P⊥Q, M⊥y(r)=0 and

( )

d d ) ( ) ( d d

2

= Ω = Ω

± ⋅ ± ±

m

m σ σ r r r

r Q d

e M b

i

The difference between the two non-spin flip cross-sections will give information on the ferromagnetic moment. Plot M(Q) as a function of Q and a characteristic line shape will emerge: UPtAl This characteristic line shape is known as the form factor, f(Q)

  • P. Javorsky et al., Phys. Rev. B 67 (2003) 224429
slide-35
SLIDE 35

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Magnetic form factors

The form factor arises from the spatial distribution of unpaired electrons around a magnetic atom. For magnetic scattering due only to electron spin:

( )

R R = R R r r r M M

R Q R Q r Q r Q

d e S Q f d e S d e s d e

i i d i d i

d

⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ∝ ⋅ =

⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅

∫ ∫ ∫ ∫

) ( ) ( ) ( ) (Q R rd Atom at position R with a density

  • f unpaired (magnetic) electrons

For magnetic scattering due only to electron spin:

( )

( )

( )

⋅ ∝ = Ω

− ⋅ ⊥ ⊥ ⊥

R R R M M

R R Q

d e S S Q f d d

j i

i j i magnetic * 2 *

) ( ) ( ) ( Q Q σ

( )

d i d

d e s Q f

d

r

r Q

⋅ =

slide-36
SLIDE 36

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Magnetic electron density

UPtAl

  • P. Javorsky et al., Phys. Rev. B 67 (2003) 224429

From the form factors, the magnetic moment density in the unit cell can be derived crystal structure magnetic moment density

( )

d i d

d e s Q f

d

r

r Q

⋅ =

slide-37
SLIDE 37

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Elastic scattering The contribution from the average structure of the sample: Long-range order The contribution from deviations from the average structure: Short-range order

( )

r r r r

r Q r Q

d e z V V d e V s V s p m

i i s s n

⋅ ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ − + ⋅ ∝ ′ ′ ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ = Ω

⋅ ⋅ ′ ′

∫ ∫ ∑

) ( ˆ ˆ ˆ , ˆ , 2 d d

2 2 2 2 , 2 2 ζ

π σ k k h

slide-38
SLIDE 38

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

The physical meaning of z(r)

Given an atom at position r1, what’s the probability of finding a similar atom at position r2?

z(r), real space Z(Q), reciprocal space

A A

Zero probability?

a A 1/a A×a

Gaussian probability? Delta function Constant Gaussian Gaussian Any spherically symmetric function? e.g. a hollow sphere Delta function at r ≠ 0

r Q

sin(Qr)/Qr

slide-39
SLIDE 39

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Magnetic structure of Holmium superlattices

  • R. A. Cowley, Physica B 350 (2004) 1

Ho Y Ho Y Ho Measurement of Ho41/Y16

Substrate Ho Y

Rotation angle propagates through the non-magnetic yttrium

nuclear magnetic

slide-40
SLIDE 40

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Magnetic structure of Holmium superlattices Measurement of Ho20/Pr20

Substrate Ho Pr

  • R. A. Cowley, Physica B 350 (2004) 1

Ho Pr Ho Pr Ho

Q [00l]

Rotation angle does not propagate through the non- magnetic praseodymium

magnetic magnetic nuclear

slide-41
SLIDE 41

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Magnetic and nuclear short-range order are often coupled At the very least, the diffuse scattering is often a mixture of magnetic and nuclear contributions Neutron polarization analysis is usually essential for the measurement of magnetic short-range order

Diffuse scattering and polarization analysis

Recall: if P || Q, the non-spin flip scattering is all nuclear the spin flip scattering is all magnetic if P⊥Q, the non-spin flip scattering is due to nuclear and magnetic, the magnetic components are parallel to P. the spin flip scattering is all magnetic, the magnetic components are perpendicular to P and Q.

  • T. J. Hicks, Magnetism in Disorder, 1995, Clarendon Press, Oxford
slide-42
SLIDE 42

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

For a paramagnet, z(r) = δ(r), dσ ±m dΩ ∝ 2 3 f 2(Q)S S +1

( )

non-spin flip spin flip

  • R. M. Moon, T. Riste and W. K. Koehler, Phys. Rev. 181 (1969) 920

Diffuse scattering from a paramagnet, MnF2

slide-43
SLIDE 43

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Diffuse scattering from a spin-glass, Cu0.95Mn0.05

magnetic scattering nuclear scattering

  • A. P. Murani et al., Physica B 267-268 (1999) 131
  • T. J. Hicks, Magnetism in Disorder, 1995, Clarendon Press, Oxford
  • J. R. Stewart et al., J. Appl. Phys. 87 (2000) 5425
slide-44
SLIDE 44

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Diffuse scattering from a spin-glass, Cu0.95Mn0.05

magnetic scattering nuclear scattering

  • A. P. Murani et al., Physica B 267-268 (1999) 131
  • T. J. Hicks, Magnetism in Disorder, 1995, Clarendon Press, Oxford
  • J. R. Stewart et al., J. Appl. Phys. 87 (2000) 5425

Form-factor like background, frozen moments

slide-45
SLIDE 45

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Diffuse scattering from a spin-glass, Cu0.95Mn0.05

magnetic scattering nuclear scattering Anticlustering by Mn atoms

  • A. P. Murani et al., Physica B 267-268 (1999) 131
  • T. J. Hicks, Magnetism in Disorder, 1995, Clarendon Press, Oxford
  • J. R. Stewart et al., J. Appl. Phys. 87 (2000) 5425

(i.e., Mn atoms want to surround themselves with Cu) Form-factor like background, frozen moments

slide-46
SLIDE 46

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Diffuse scattering from a spin-glass, Cu0.95Mn0.05

magnetic scattering nuclear scattering Anticlustering by Mn atoms Anticlustering, ferromagnetic

  • A. P. Murani et al., Physica B 267-268 (1999) 131
  • T. J. Hicks, Magnetism in Disorder, 1995, Clarendon Press, Oxford
  • J. R. Stewart et al., J. Appl. Phys. 87 (2000) 5425

Form-factor like background, frozen moments

slide-47
SLIDE 47

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Diffuse scattering from a spin-glass, Cu0.95Mn0.05

magnetic scattering nuclear scattering Anticlustering by Mn atoms Anticlustering, ferromagnetic

  • A. P. Murani et al., Physica B 267-268 (1999) 131
  • T. J. Hicks, Magnetism in Disorder, 1995, Clarendon Press, Oxford
  • J. R. Stewart et al., J. Appl. Phys. 87 (2000) 5425

Form-factor like background, frozen moments Forward scattering, ferromagnetic

slide-48
SLIDE 48

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Diffuse scattering from a spin-glass, Cu0.95Mn0.05

magnetic scattering nuclear scattering Anticlustering by Mn atoms Anticlustering, ferromagnetic

  • A. P. Murani et al., Physica B 267-268 (1999) 131
  • T. J. Hicks, Magnetism in Disorder, 1995, Clarendon Press, Oxford
  • J. R. Stewart et al., J. Appl. Phys. 87 (2000) 5425

Form-factor like background, frozen moments Forward scattering, ferromagnetic Spin Density Wave?

slide-49
SLIDE 49

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Diffuse scattering from magnetic frustration, Gd2Ti2O7

magnetic scattering magnetic scattering at 46mK with fits Structure model 1 Structure model 2

  • J. R. Stewart et al., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16 (2004) L321

dσ ±m dΩ ∝ 2 3 f 2(Q) SoSr sin Qr

( )

Qr

slide-50
SLIDE 50

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

Diffuse scattering in metallic glasses, Fe80–xRuxB20

Metallic glasses have no long-ranged order, but each magnetic moment has a common axis. They are therefore ferromagnetic.

( )

2 2

) ( d d ) ( ) ( d d

∫ ∫

⋅ ⊥ ± ⋅ ⊥ ± ±

= Ω = Ω r r r r r

r Q r Q

d e M d e M b

i y i z m

m σ σ

  • A. R. Wildes and N. Cowlam, Recent research developments in magnetism and magnetic materials, 2003, Transworld Research Network, India

Collinear ferromagnetic. Non-collinear ferromagnetic, asperromagnetic

spin flip spin flip non-spin flip non-spin flip

Q (Å) Q (Å) barn/sterad.atom barn/sterad.atom

Fe62Ru18B20 Fe80B20

slide-51
SLIDE 51

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Non-spin flip

I00 I11

Q (Å−1)

barn . sterad−1 . atom−1

Fe Tb Ferrimagnetism Diffuse scattering in metallic glasses, Fe73Tb10B17

  • N. Cowlam et al., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 17 (2005) 3585

( )

2

) ( ) ( d d

⋅ ⊥ ± ±

= Ω r r r

r Q d

e M b

i z

m σ M(r) is directional - its sign can change as a function of r.

slide-52
SLIDE 52

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

The ‘Family Tree’ of Magnetism

slide-53
SLIDE 53

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN

After coffee... Inelastic scattering Reflectivity and dynamical scattering Neutron polarimetry