PhD Dissertation, Ingegneria Matematica e Simulazione Scienze e - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
phd dissertation ingegneria matematica e simulazione
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

PhD Dissertation, Ingegneria Matematica e Simulazione Scienze e - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jun 27, 2023 415 likes •2.38k views

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions PhD Dissertation, Ingegneria Matematica e Simulazione Scienze e Tecnologie per lIngegneria School Lorenzo Cioni 1 , 2 , 3 1 DIME (ex DIPTEM), University of Genova 2 Department of

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

PhD Dissertation, Ingegneria Matematica e Simulazione “Scienze e Tecnologie per l’Ingegneria” School Lorenzo Cioni1,2,3

1DIME (ex DIPTEM), University of Genova 2Department of Computer Science, University of Pisa 3Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa

DIME, University of Genova, April 12 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

The Thesis Main topics (Thesis) & main themes (Presentation)

2 THE PRELIMINARIES

Motivations and aims Background concepts Public policies

3 THE MAIN BODY

Top-down & Bottom-up The mesolevel and other complexities Some models The micro-macro conflict

4 CONCLUSIONS

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

The Thesis Main topics (Thesis) & main themes (Presentation)

2 THE PRELIMINARIES

Motivations and aims Background concepts Public policies

3 THE MAIN BODY

Top-down & Bottom-up The mesolevel and other complexities Some models The micro-macro conflict

4 CONCLUSIONS

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

The Thesis Main topics (Thesis) & main themes (Presentation)

2 THE PRELIMINARIES

Motivations and aims Background concepts Public policies

3 THE MAIN BODY

Top-down & Bottom-up The mesolevel and other complexities Some models The micro-macro conflict

4 CONCLUSIONS

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

The Thesis Main topics (Thesis) & main themes (Presentation)

2 THE PRELIMINARIES

Motivations and aims Background concepts Public policies

3 THE MAIN BODY

Top-down & Bottom-up The mesolevel and other complexities Some models The micro-macro conflict

4 CONCLUSIONS

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

INTRODUCTION

1 INTRODUCTION

The Thesis Main topics (Thesis) & main themes (Presentation)

2 THE PRELIMINARIES

Motivations and aims Background concepts Public policies

3 THE MAIN BODY

Top-down & Bottom-up The mesolevel and other complexities Some models The micro-macro conflict

4 CONCLUSIONS

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

ABOUT THE THESIS

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

ABOUT THE THESIS

⇒ Title: “Top-down and bottom-up interactions between individual and collective behaviors” ⇒ Tutor: Professor Agostino Bruzzone ⇒ Central topics: interactions between formal norms and social norms, micro-macro conflict

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

ABOUT THE THESIS

⇒ Title: “Top-down and bottom-up interactions between individual and collective behaviors” ⇒ Tutor: Professor Agostino Bruzzone ⇒ Central topics: interactions between formal norms and social norms, micro-macro conflict

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

ABOUT THE THESIS

⇒ Title: “Top-down and bottom-up interactions between individual and collective behaviors” ⇒ Tutor: Professor Agostino Bruzzone ⇒ Central topics: interactions between formal norms and social norms, micro-macro conflict

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

ABOUT THE THESIS

⇒ Title: “Top-down and bottom-up interactions between individual and collective behaviors” ⇒ Tutor: Professor Agostino Bruzzone ⇒ Central topics: interactions between formal norms and social norms, micro-macro conflict

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

ABOUT THE THESIS

⇒ Title: “Top-down and bottom-up interactions between individual and collective behaviors” ⇒ Tutor: Professor Agostino Bruzzone ⇒ Central topics: interactions between formal norms and social norms, micro-macro conflict

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

INTRODUCTION

1 INTRODUCTION

The Thesis Main topics (Thesis) & main themes (Presentation)

2 THE PRELIMINARIES

Motivations and aims Background concepts Public policies

3 THE MAIN BODY

Top-down & Bottom-up The mesolevel and other complexities Some models The micro-macro conflict

4 CONCLUSIONS

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MAIN TOPICS OF THE THESIS

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MAIN TOPICS OF THE THESIS

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MAIN TOPICS OF THE THESIS

The present Thesis: ⇒ defines and characterizes interactions among social planners and stakeholders; ⇒ from different perspectives; ⇒ at different levels of abstraction, granularity and complexity; ⇒ by using different (abstract) simulation models; ⇒ by using different (high level) mechanisms; ⇒ within a unifying perspective (the micro-macro conflict).

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MAIN TOPICS OF THE THESIS

The present Thesis: ⇒ defines and characterizes interactions among social planners and stakeholders; ⇒ from different perspectives; ⇒ at different levels of abstraction, granularity and complexity; ⇒ by using different (abstract) simulation models; ⇒ by using different (high level) mechanisms; ⇒ within a unifying perspective (the micro-macro conflict).

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MAIN TOPICS OF THE THESIS

The present Thesis: ⇒ defines and characterizes interactions among social planners and stakeholders; ⇒ from different perspectives; ⇒ at different levels of abstraction, granularity and complexity; ⇒ by using different (abstract) simulation models; ⇒ by using different (high level) mechanisms; ⇒ within a unifying perspective (the micro-macro conflict).

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MAIN TOPICS OF THE THESIS

The present Thesis: ⇒ defines and characterizes interactions among social planners and stakeholders; ⇒ from different perspectives; ⇒ at different levels of abstraction, granularity and complexity; ⇒ by using different (abstract) simulation models; ⇒ by using different (high level) mechanisms; ⇒ within a unifying perspective (the micro-macro conflict).

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MAIN TOPICS OF THE THESIS

The present Thesis: ⇒ defines and characterizes interactions among social planners and stakeholders; ⇒ from different perspectives; ⇒ at different levels of abstraction, granularity and complexity; ⇒ by using different (abstract) simulation models; ⇒ by using different (high level) mechanisms; ⇒ within a unifying perspective (the micro-macro conflict).

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MAIN TOPICS OF THE THESIS

The present Thesis: ⇒ defines and characterizes interactions among social planners and stakeholders; ⇒ from different perspectives; ⇒ at different levels of abstraction, granularity and complexity; ⇒ by using different (abstract) simulation models; ⇒ by using different (high level) mechanisms; ⇒ within a unifying perspective (the micro-macro conflict).

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MAIN TOPICS OF THE THESIS

The present Thesis: ⇒ defines and characterizes interactions among social planners and stakeholders; ⇒ from different perspectives; ⇒ at different levels of abstraction, granularity and complexity; ⇒ by using different (abstract) simulation models; ⇒ by using different (high level) mechanisms; ⇒ within a unifying perspective (the micro-macro conflict).

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MAIN TOPICS OF THE THESIS

The present Thesis: ⇒ defines and characterizes interactions among social planners and stakeholders; ⇒ from different perspectives; ⇒ at different levels of abstraction, granularity and complexity; ⇒ by using different (abstract) simulation models; ⇒ by using different (high level) mechanisms; ⇒ within a unifying perspective (the micro-macro conflict).

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MAIN THEMES OF THIS PRESENTATION

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MAIN THEMES OF THIS PRESENTATION

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MAIN THEMES OF THIS PRESENTATION

In this presentation we: ⇒ present the motivations and the aims of the thesis; ⇒ list some background concepts; ⇒ discuss of public policies, formal norms and social norms; ⇒ present the top-down approach; ⇒ present the bottom-up approach; ⇒ illustrate some simulation models; ⇒ analyze the micro-macro conflict.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MAIN THEMES OF THIS PRESENTATION

In this presentation we: ⇒ present the motivations and the aims of the thesis; ⇒ list some background concepts; ⇒ discuss of public policies, formal norms and social norms; ⇒ present the top-down approach; ⇒ present the bottom-up approach; ⇒ illustrate some simulation models; ⇒ analyze the micro-macro conflict.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MAIN THEMES OF THIS PRESENTATION

In this presentation we: ⇒ present the motivations and the aims of the thesis; ⇒ list some background concepts; ⇒ discuss of public policies, formal norms and social norms; ⇒ present the top-down approach; ⇒ present the bottom-up approach; ⇒ illustrate some simulation models; ⇒ analyze the micro-macro conflict.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MAIN THEMES OF THIS PRESENTATION

In this presentation we: ⇒ present the motivations and the aims of the thesis; ⇒ list some background concepts; ⇒ discuss of public policies, formal norms and social norms; ⇒ present the top-down approach; ⇒ present the bottom-up approach; ⇒ illustrate some simulation models; ⇒ analyze the micro-macro conflict.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MAIN THEMES OF THIS PRESENTATION

In this presentation we: ⇒ present the motivations and the aims of the thesis; ⇒ list some background concepts; ⇒ discuss of public policies, formal norms and social norms; ⇒ present the top-down approach; ⇒ present the bottom-up approach; ⇒ illustrate some simulation models; ⇒ analyze the micro-macro conflict.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MAIN THEMES OF THIS PRESENTATION

In this presentation we: ⇒ present the motivations and the aims of the thesis; ⇒ list some background concepts; ⇒ discuss of public policies, formal norms and social norms; ⇒ present the top-down approach; ⇒ present the bottom-up approach; ⇒ illustrate some simulation models; ⇒ analyze the micro-macro conflict.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MAIN THEMES OF THIS PRESENTATION

In this presentation we: ⇒ present the motivations and the aims of the thesis; ⇒ list some background concepts; ⇒ discuss of public policies, formal norms and social norms; ⇒ present the top-down approach; ⇒ present the bottom-up approach; ⇒ illustrate some simulation models; ⇒ analyze the micro-macro conflict.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MAIN THEMES OF THIS PRESENTATION

In this presentation we: ⇒ present the motivations and the aims of the thesis; ⇒ list some background concepts; ⇒ discuss of public policies, formal norms and social norms; ⇒ present the top-down approach; ⇒ present the bottom-up approach; ⇒ illustrate some simulation models; ⇒ analyze the micro-macro conflict.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MAIN THEMES OF THIS PRESENTATION

In this presentation we: ⇒ present the motivations and the aims of the thesis; ⇒ list some background concepts; ⇒ discuss of public policies, formal norms and social norms; ⇒ present the top-down approach; ⇒ present the bottom-up approach; ⇒ illustrate some simulation models; ⇒ analyze the micro-macro conflict.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

INTRODUCTION

1 INTRODUCTION

The Thesis Main topics (Thesis) & main themes (Presentation)

2 THE PRELIMINARIES

Motivations and aims Background concepts Public policies

3 THE MAIN BODY

Top-down & Bottom-up The mesolevel and other complexities Some models The micro-macro conflict

4 CONCLUSIONS

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MOTIVATIONS

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MOTIVATIONS

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MOTIVATIONS

The main motivations of the thesis are: (1) to try to understand the interactions between individual and collective behaviors; (2) to try to attune formal norms (social planners) with the social norms (stakeholders); (3) to try to minimize the need of coercive and punitive tools.

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MOTIVATIONS

The main motivations of the thesis are: (1) to try to understand the interactions between individual and collective behaviors; (2) to try to attune formal norms (social planners) with the social norms (stakeholders); (3) to try to minimize the need of coercive and punitive tools.

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MOTIVATIONS

The main motivations of the thesis are: (1) to try to understand the interactions between individual and collective behaviors; (2) to try to attune formal norms (social planners) with the social norms (stakeholders); (3) to try to minimize the need of coercive and punitive tools.

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MOTIVATIONS

The main motivations of the thesis are: (1) to try to understand the interactions between individual and collective behaviors; (2) to try to attune formal norms (social planners) with the social norms (stakeholders); (3) to try to minimize the need of coercive and punitive tools.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MOTIVATIONS

The main motivations of the thesis are: (1) to try to understand the interactions between individual and collective behaviors; (2) to try to attune formal norms (social planners) with the social norms (stakeholders); (3) to try to minimize the need of coercive and punitive tools.

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE AIMS

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE AIMS

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE AIMS

The main aims of the thesis are: (1) to characterize a descriptive approach; (2) to provide normative suggestions for a proper design of formal norms; (3) to make clear the feedback relations between the various levels.

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE AIMS

The main aims of the thesis are: (1) to characterize a descriptive approach; (2) to provide normative suggestions for a proper design of formal norms; (3) to make clear the feedback relations between the various levels.

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE AIMS

The main aims of the thesis are: (1) to characterize a descriptive approach; (2) to provide normative suggestions for a proper design of formal norms; (3) to make clear the feedback relations between the various levels.

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE AIMS

The main aims of the thesis are: (1) to characterize a descriptive approach; (2) to provide normative suggestions for a proper design of formal norms; (3) to make clear the feedback relations between the various levels.

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE AIMS

The main aims of the thesis are: (1) to characterize a descriptive approach; (2) to provide normative suggestions for a proper design of formal norms; (3) to make clear the feedback relations between the various levels.

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

INTRODUCTION

1 INTRODUCTION

The Thesis Main topics (Thesis) & main themes (Presentation)

2 THE PRELIMINARIES

Motivations and aims Background concepts Public policies

3 THE MAIN BODY

Top-down & Bottom-up The mesolevel and other complexities Some models The micro-macro conflict

4 CONCLUSIONS

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE APPROACHES

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE APPROACHES

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE APPROACHES

We adopted the following approaches: ⇒ descriptive, as a cognitive tool; ⇒ normative, as a framing tool; ⇒ prescriptive, as a more binding framing tool.

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE APPROACHES

We adopted the following approaches: ⇒ descriptive, as a cognitive tool; ⇒ normative, as a framing tool; ⇒ prescriptive, as a more binding framing tool.

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE APPROACHES

We adopted the following approaches: ⇒ descriptive, as a cognitive tool; ⇒ normative, as a framing tool; ⇒ prescriptive, as a more binding framing tool.

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE APPROACHES

We adopted the following approaches: ⇒ descriptive, as a cognitive tool; ⇒ normative, as a framing tool; ⇒ prescriptive, as a more binding framing tool.

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE APPROACHES

We adopted the following approaches: ⇒ descriptive, as a cognitive tool; ⇒ normative, as a framing tool; ⇒ prescriptive, as a more binding framing tool. From the social planners (as designers of formal norms) point

  • f view (more centralized, focused).
slide-58
SLIDE 58

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE APPROACHES

We adopted the following approaches: ⇒ descriptive, as a cognitive tool; ⇒ normative, as a framing tool; ⇒ prescriptive, as a more binding framing tool. From the social planners (as designers of formal norms) point

  • f view (more centralized, focused).

From the stakeholders (as organizers of social norms) perspective (more diffuse, distributed, fuzzy).

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE APPROACHES

We adopted the following approaches: ⇒ descriptive, as a cognitive tool; ⇒ normative, as a framing tool; ⇒ prescriptive, as a more binding framing tool. From the social planners (as designers of formal norms) point

  • f view (more centralized, focused).

From the stakeholders (as organizers of social norms) perspective (more diffuse, distributed, fuzzy).

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE LEVELS

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE LEVELS

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE LEVELS

We moved at the following levels: ⇒ microlevel where we have interacting individuals as singletons; ⇒ mesolevel where we consider the presence of groups and coalitions; ⇒ macrolevel where we consider a society as a whole.

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE LEVELS

We moved at the following levels: ⇒ microlevel where we have interacting individuals as singletons; ⇒ mesolevel where we consider the presence of groups and coalitions; ⇒ macrolevel where we consider a society as a whole.

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE LEVELS

We moved at the following levels: ⇒ microlevel where we have interacting individuals as singletons; ⇒ mesolevel where we consider the presence of groups and coalitions; ⇒ macrolevel where we consider a society as a whole.

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE LEVELS

We moved at the following levels: ⇒ microlevel where we have interacting individuals as singletons; ⇒ mesolevel where we consider the presence of groups and coalitions; ⇒ macrolevel where we consider a society as a whole.

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE LEVELS

We moved at the following levels: ⇒ microlevel where we have interacting individuals as singletons; ⇒ mesolevel where we consider the presence of groups and coalitions; ⇒ macrolevel where we consider a society as a whole. Feedback links between the levels. Three feedback loops.

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE LEVELS

We moved at the following levels: ⇒ microlevel where we have interacting individuals as singletons; ⇒ mesolevel where we consider the presence of groups and coalitions; ⇒ macrolevel where we consider a society as a whole. Feedback links between the levels. Three feedback loops. The levels are abstraction tools and do not belong to the fabric of the reality.

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE LEVELS

We moved at the following levels: ⇒ microlevel where we have interacting individuals as singletons; ⇒ mesolevel where we consider the presence of groups and coalitions; ⇒ macrolevel where we consider a society as a whole. Feedback links between the levels. Three feedback loops. The levels are abstraction tools and do not belong to the fabric of the reality.

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

SIMULATIONS

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

SIMULATIONS

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

SIMULATIONS

We used simulations ⇒ at the microlevel (extensively); ⇒ at the mesolevel (only planned, indirectly); ⇒ at the macrolevel (extensively). ⇒ “Correspondences” between models (indirectly between levels).

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

SIMULATIONS

We used simulations ⇒ at the microlevel (extensively); ⇒ at the mesolevel (only planned, indirectly); ⇒ at the macrolevel (extensively). ⇒ “Correspondences” between models (indirectly between levels).

slide-73
SLIDE 73

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

SIMULATIONS

We used simulations ⇒ at the microlevel (extensively); ⇒ at the mesolevel (only planned, indirectly); ⇒ at the macrolevel (extensively). ⇒ “Correspondences” between models (indirectly between levels).

slide-74
SLIDE 74

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

SIMULATIONS

We used simulations ⇒ at the microlevel (extensively); ⇒ at the mesolevel (only planned, indirectly); ⇒ at the macrolevel (extensively). ⇒ “Correspondences” between models (indirectly between levels).

slide-75
SLIDE 75

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

SIMULATIONS

We used simulations ⇒ at the microlevel (extensively); ⇒ at the mesolevel (only planned, indirectly); ⇒ at the macrolevel (extensively). ⇒ “Correspondences” between models (indirectly between levels).

slide-76
SLIDE 76

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

SIMULATIONS

We used simulations ⇒ at the microlevel (extensively); ⇒ at the mesolevel (only planned, indirectly); ⇒ at the macrolevel (extensively). ⇒ “Correspondences” between models (indirectly between levels). Simulation as a descriptive or cognitive tool with normative and prescriptive hints.

slide-77
SLIDE 77

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

SIMULATIONS

We used simulations ⇒ at the microlevel (extensively); ⇒ at the mesolevel (only planned, indirectly); ⇒ at the macrolevel (extensively). ⇒ “Correspondences” between models (indirectly between levels). Simulation as a descriptive or cognitive tool with normative and prescriptive hints.

slide-78
SLIDE 78

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

INTRODUCTION

1 INTRODUCTION

The Thesis Main topics (Thesis) & main themes (Presentation)

2 THE PRELIMINARIES

Motivations and aims Background concepts Public policies

3 THE MAIN BODY

Top-down & Bottom-up The mesolevel and other complexities Some models The micro-macro conflict

4 CONCLUSIONS

slide-79
SLIDE 79

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE PUBLIC POLICIES

slide-80
SLIDE 80

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE PUBLIC POLICIES

slide-81
SLIDE 81

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE PUBLIC POLICIES

A public policy: ⇒ is designed by the social planners; ⇒ defines formal norms; ⇒ may contrast with social norms; ⇒ may give rise to reactive social norms.

slide-82
SLIDE 82

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE PUBLIC POLICIES

A public policy: ⇒ is designed by the social planners; ⇒ defines formal norms; ⇒ may contrast with social norms; ⇒ may give rise to reactive social norms.

slide-83
SLIDE 83

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE PUBLIC POLICIES

A public policy: ⇒ is designed by the social planners; ⇒ defines formal norms; ⇒ may contrast with social norms; ⇒ may give rise to reactive social norms.

slide-84
SLIDE 84

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE PUBLIC POLICIES

A public policy: ⇒ is designed by the social planners; ⇒ defines formal norms; ⇒ may contrast with social norms; ⇒ may give rise to reactive social norms.

slide-85
SLIDE 85

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE PUBLIC POLICIES

A public policy: ⇒ is designed by the social planners; ⇒ defines formal norms; ⇒ may contrast with social norms; ⇒ may give rise to reactive social norms.

slide-86
SLIDE 86

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE PUBLIC POLICIES

A public policy: ⇒ is designed by the social planners; ⇒ defines formal norms; ⇒ may contrast with social norms; ⇒ may give rise to reactive social norms. Public policies may either succeed (accepted, no refusals nor boycotting) or fail (reacted, rejected, boycotted). Degrees of success/failure.

slide-87
SLIDE 87

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE PUBLIC POLICIES

A public policy: ⇒ is designed by the social planners; ⇒ defines formal norms; ⇒ may contrast with social norms; ⇒ may give rise to reactive social norms. Public policies may either succeed (accepted, no refusals nor boycotting) or fail (reacted, rejected, boycotted). Degrees of success/failure.

slide-88
SLIDE 88

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

A SUCCESSFUL PUBLIC POLICY

slide-89
SLIDE 89

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

A SUCCESSFUL PUBLIC POLICY

slide-90
SLIDE 90

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

A SUCCESSFUL PUBLIC POLICY

slide-91
SLIDE 91

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

A SUCCESSFUL PUBLIC POLICY

slide-92
SLIDE 92

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

AN UNSUCCESSFUL PUBLIC POLICY

slide-93
SLIDE 93

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

AN UNSUCCESSFUL PUBLIC POLICY

slide-94
SLIDE 94

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

AN UNSUCCESSFUL PUBLIC POLICY

slide-95
SLIDE 95

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

AN UNSUCCESSFUL PUBLIC POLICY

slide-96
SLIDE 96

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

INTRODUCTION

1 INTRODUCTION

The Thesis Main topics (Thesis) & main themes (Presentation)

2 THE PRELIMINARIES

Motivations and aims Background concepts Public policies

3 THE MAIN BODY

Top-down & Bottom-up The mesolevel and other complexities Some models The micro-macro conflict

4 CONCLUSIONS

slide-97
SLIDE 97

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

TOP-DOWN DESIGN (FROM THE FEW TO THE MANY)

slide-98
SLIDE 98

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

TOP-DOWN DESIGN (FROM THE FEW TO THE MANY)

⇒ Analysis/description tool. ⇒ Planning activities of the social planners: → end product formal norms within a normative context; → it requires a descriptive preliminary step; → “global” normative/prescriptive/proscriptive aims; → hints for success: flexibility, distributed control, economical/ethical incentives.

slide-99
SLIDE 99

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

TOP-DOWN DESIGN (FROM THE FEW TO THE MANY)

⇒ Analysis/description tool. ⇒ Planning activities of the social planners: → end product formal norms within a normative context; → it requires a descriptive preliminary step; → “global” normative/prescriptive/proscriptive aims; → hints for success: flexibility, distributed control, economical/ethical incentives.

slide-100
SLIDE 100

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

TOP-DOWN DESIGN (FROM THE FEW TO THE MANY)

⇒ Analysis/description tool. ⇒ Planning activities of the social planners: → end product formal norms within a normative context; → it requires a descriptive preliminary step; → “global” normative/prescriptive/proscriptive aims; → hints for success: flexibility, distributed control, economical/ethical incentives.

slide-101
SLIDE 101

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

TOP-DOWN DESIGN (FROM THE FEW TO THE MANY)

⇒ Analysis/description tool. ⇒ Planning activities of the social planners: → end product formal norms within a normative context; → it requires a descriptive preliminary step; → “global” normative/prescriptive/proscriptive aims; → hints for success: flexibility, distributed control, economical/ethical incentives.

slide-102
SLIDE 102

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

TOP-DOWN DESIGN (FROM THE FEW TO THE MANY)

⇒ Analysis/description tool. ⇒ Planning activities of the social planners: → end product formal norms within a normative context; → it requires a descriptive preliminary step; → “global” normative/prescriptive/proscriptive aims; → hints for success: flexibility, distributed control, economical/ethical incentives.

slide-103
SLIDE 103

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

TOP-DOWN DESIGN (FROM THE FEW TO THE MANY)

⇒ Analysis/description tool. ⇒ Planning activities of the social planners: → end product formal norms within a normative context; → it requires a descriptive preliminary step; → “global” normative/prescriptive/proscriptive aims; → hints for success: flexibility, distributed control, economical/ethical incentives.

slide-104
SLIDE 104

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

TOP-DOWN DESIGN (FROM THE FEW TO THE MANY)

⇒ Analysis/description tool. ⇒ Planning activities of the social planners: → end product formal norms within a normative context; → it requires a descriptive preliminary step; → “global” normative/prescriptive/proscriptive aims; → hints for success: flexibility, distributed control, economical/ethical incentives.

slide-105
SLIDE 105

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

TOP-DOWN DESIGN (FROM THE FEW TO THE MANY)

⇒ Analysis/description tool. ⇒ Planning activities of the social planners: → end product formal norms within a normative context; → it requires a descriptive preliminary step; → “global” normative/prescriptive/proscriptive aims; → hints for success: flexibility, distributed control, economical/ethical incentives.

slide-106
SLIDE 106

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

BOTTOM-UP (FROM THE MANY TO THE FEW)

slide-107
SLIDE 107

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

BOTTOM-UP (FROM THE MANY TO THE FEW)

slide-108
SLIDE 108

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

BOTTOM-UP (FROM THE MANY TO THE FEW)

⇒ Analysis/description tool.

slide-109
SLIDE 109

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

BOTTOM-UP (FROM THE MANY TO THE FEW)

⇒ Analysis/description tool. ⇒ Reactive/proactive activities of the stakeholders: → social norms as reactions (reactivity) or as local initiatives (proactivity); → “locally” normative/prescriptive purposes; → based on simple actions, no global plan; → give rise to complex emergent behaviors.

slide-110
SLIDE 110

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

BOTTOM-UP (FROM THE MANY TO THE FEW)

⇒ Analysis/description tool. ⇒ Reactive/proactive activities of the stakeholders: → social norms as reactions (reactivity) or as local initiatives (proactivity); → “locally” normative/prescriptive purposes; → based on simple actions, no global plan; → give rise to complex emergent behaviors.

slide-111
SLIDE 111

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

BOTTOM-UP (FROM THE MANY TO THE FEW)

⇒ Analysis/description tool. ⇒ Reactive/proactive activities of the stakeholders: → social norms as reactions (reactivity) or as local initiatives (proactivity); → “locally” normative/prescriptive purposes; → based on simple actions, no global plan; → give rise to complex emergent behaviors.

slide-112
SLIDE 112

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

BOTTOM-UP (FROM THE MANY TO THE FEW)

⇒ Analysis/description tool. ⇒ Reactive/proactive activities of the stakeholders: → social norms as reactions (reactivity) or as local initiatives (proactivity); → “locally” normative/prescriptive purposes; → based on simple actions, no global plan; → give rise to complex emergent behaviors.

slide-113
SLIDE 113

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

BOTTOM-UP (FROM THE MANY TO THE FEW)

⇒ Analysis/description tool. ⇒ Reactive/proactive activities of the stakeholders: → social norms as reactions (reactivity) or as local initiatives (proactivity); → “locally” normative/prescriptive purposes; → based on simple actions, no global plan; → give rise to complex emergent behaviors.

slide-114
SLIDE 114

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

BOTTOM-UP (FROM THE MANY TO THE FEW)

⇒ Analysis/description tool. ⇒ Reactive/proactive activities of the stakeholders: → social norms as reactions (reactivity) or as local initiatives (proactivity); → “locally” normative/prescriptive purposes; → based on simple actions, no global plan; → give rise to complex emergent behaviors.

slide-115
SLIDE 115

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

INTRODUCTION

1 INTRODUCTION

The Thesis Main topics (Thesis) & main themes (Presentation)

2 THE PRELIMINARIES

Motivations and aims Background concepts Public policies

3 THE MAIN BODY

Top-down & Bottom-up The mesolevel and other complexities Some models The micro-macro conflict

4 CONCLUSIONS

slide-116
SLIDE 116

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE PRESENCE OF THE MESOLEVEL

slide-117
SLIDE 117

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE PRESENCE OF THE MESOLEVEL

slide-118
SLIDE 118

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE PRESENCE OF THE MESOLEVEL

The mesolevel is an intermediate level between microlevel and macrolevel: ⇒ abstraction and analysis tool, two-ways action; ⇒ filter, mediation (Top-down); ⇒ organization, contrast (Bottom-up). ⇒ It contains either groups (covering) or coalitions (partitioning). ⇒ Individuals ⇒ roles ⇒ clones. Coalitions of clones as an unifying approach.

slide-119
SLIDE 119

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE PRESENCE OF THE MESOLEVEL

The mesolevel is an intermediate level between microlevel and macrolevel: ⇒ abstraction and analysis tool, two-ways action; ⇒ filter, mediation (Top-down); ⇒ organization, contrast (Bottom-up). ⇒ It contains either groups (covering) or coalitions (partitioning). ⇒ Individuals ⇒ roles ⇒ clones. Coalitions of clones as an unifying approach.

slide-120
SLIDE 120

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE PRESENCE OF THE MESOLEVEL

The mesolevel is an intermediate level between microlevel and macrolevel: ⇒ abstraction and analysis tool, two-ways action; ⇒ filter, mediation (Top-down); ⇒ organization, contrast (Bottom-up). ⇒ It contains either groups (covering) or coalitions (partitioning). ⇒ Individuals ⇒ roles ⇒ clones. Coalitions of clones as an unifying approach.

slide-121
SLIDE 121

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE PRESENCE OF THE MESOLEVEL

The mesolevel is an intermediate level between microlevel and macrolevel: ⇒ abstraction and analysis tool, two-ways action; ⇒ filter, mediation (Top-down); ⇒ organization, contrast (Bottom-up). ⇒ It contains either groups (covering) or coalitions (partitioning). ⇒ Individuals ⇒ roles ⇒ clones. Coalitions of clones as an unifying approach.

slide-122
SLIDE 122

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE PRESENCE OF THE MESOLEVEL

The mesolevel is an intermediate level between microlevel and macrolevel: ⇒ abstraction and analysis tool, two-ways action; ⇒ filter, mediation (Top-down); ⇒ organization, contrast (Bottom-up). ⇒ It contains either groups (covering) or coalitions (partitioning). ⇒ Individuals ⇒ roles ⇒ clones. Coalitions of clones as an unifying approach.

slide-123
SLIDE 123

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE PRESENCE OF THE MESOLEVEL

The mesolevel is an intermediate level between microlevel and macrolevel: ⇒ abstraction and analysis tool, two-ways action; ⇒ filter, mediation (Top-down); ⇒ organization, contrast (Bottom-up). ⇒ It contains either groups (covering) or coalitions (partitioning). ⇒ Individuals ⇒ roles ⇒ clones. Coalitions of clones as an unifying approach.

slide-124
SLIDE 124

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE PRESENCE OF THE MESOLEVEL

The mesolevel is an intermediate level between microlevel and macrolevel: ⇒ abstraction and analysis tool, two-ways action; ⇒ filter, mediation (Top-down); ⇒ organization, contrast (Bottom-up). ⇒ It contains either groups (covering) or coalitions (partitioning). ⇒ Individuals ⇒ roles ⇒ clones. Coalitions of clones as an unifying approach.

slide-125
SLIDE 125

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

SUMMING UP

slide-126
SLIDE 126

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

SUMMING UP

slide-127
SLIDE 127

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

SUMMING UP

slide-128
SLIDE 128

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

SUMMING UP

slide-129
SLIDE 129

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

STRUCTURING SOCIAL PLANNERS

slide-130
SLIDE 130

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

STRUCTURING SOCIAL PLANNERS

slide-131
SLIDE 131

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

STRUCTURING SOCIAL PLANNERS

In real cases the social planners are not peers in decision

  • processes. We have:

→ types of social planners; → hierarchies of social planners. ⇒ Interactions among types, hierarchies and both. ⇒ Interactions with the stakeholders “mediated” by/through the presence of types and hierarchies.

slide-132
SLIDE 132

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

STRUCTURING SOCIAL PLANNERS

In real cases the social planners are not peers in decision

  • processes. We have:

→ types of social planners; → hierarchies of social planners. ⇒ Interactions among types, hierarchies and both. ⇒ Interactions with the stakeholders “mediated” by/through the presence of types and hierarchies.

slide-133
SLIDE 133

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

STRUCTURING SOCIAL PLANNERS

In real cases the social planners are not peers in decision

  • processes. We have:

→ types of social planners; → hierarchies of social planners. ⇒ Interactions among types, hierarchies and both. ⇒ Interactions with the stakeholders “mediated” by/through the presence of types and hierarchies.

slide-134
SLIDE 134

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

STRUCTURING SOCIAL PLANNERS

In real cases the social planners are not peers in decision

  • processes. We have:

→ types of social planners; → hierarchies of social planners. ⇒ Interactions among types, hierarchies and both. ⇒ Interactions with the stakeholders “mediated” by/through the presence of types and hierarchies.

slide-135
SLIDE 135

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

STRUCTURING SOCIAL PLANNERS

In real cases the social planners are not peers in decision

  • processes. We have:

→ types of social planners; → hierarchies of social planners. ⇒ Interactions among types, hierarchies and both. ⇒ Interactions with the stakeholders “mediated” by/through the presence of types and hierarchies.

slide-136
SLIDE 136

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

STRUCTURING SOCIAL PLANNERS

In real cases the social planners are not peers in decision

  • processes. We have:

→ types of social planners; → hierarchies of social planners. ⇒ Interactions among types, hierarchies and both. ⇒ Interactions with the stakeholders “mediated” by/through the presence of types and hierarchies.

slide-137
SLIDE 137

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

INTRODUCTION

1 INTRODUCTION

The Thesis Main topics (Thesis) & main themes (Presentation)

2 THE PRELIMINARIES

Motivations and aims Background concepts Public policies

3 THE MAIN BODY

Top-down & Bottom-up The mesolevel and other complexities Some models The micro-macro conflict

4 CONCLUSIONS

slide-138
SLIDE 138

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

A MODEL AT THE MACROLEVEL

slide-139
SLIDE 139

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

A MODEL AT THE MACROLEVEL

slide-140
SLIDE 140

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

A MODEL AT THE MACROLEVEL

slide-141
SLIDE 141

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

A MODEL AT THE MACROLEVEL

slide-142
SLIDE 142

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

A CORRESPONDING MODEL AT THE MICROLEVEL (1)

slide-143
SLIDE 143

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

A CORRESPONDING MODEL AT THE MICROLEVEL (1)

slide-144
SLIDE 144

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

A CORRESPONDING MODEL AT THE MICROLEVEL (1)

slide-145
SLIDE 145

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

A CORRESPONDING MODEL AT THE MICROLEVEL (1)

slide-146
SLIDE 146

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

A CORRESPONDING MODEL AT THE MICROLEVEL (2)

slide-147
SLIDE 147

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

A CORRESPONDING MODEL AT THE MICROLEVEL (2)

slide-148
SLIDE 148

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

A CORRESPONDING MODEL AT THE MICROLEVEL (2)

slide-149
SLIDE 149

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

A CORRESPONDING MODEL AT THE MICROLEVEL (2)

slide-150
SLIDE 150

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

INTRODUCTION

1 INTRODUCTION

The Thesis Main topics (Thesis) & main themes (Presentation)

2 THE PRELIMINARIES

Motivations and aims Background concepts Public policies

3 THE MAIN BODY

Top-down & Bottom-up The mesolevel and other complexities Some models The micro-macro conflict

4 CONCLUSIONS

slide-151
SLIDE 151

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MICRO-MACRO CONFLICT (1)

slide-152
SLIDE 152

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MICRO-MACRO CONFLICT (1)

slide-153
SLIDE 153

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MICRO-MACRO CONFLICT (1)

The micro-macro conflict ingredients: ⇒ formal norms as the outcome of a [global] planning process (social planners); ⇒ social norms as the outcome of local interactions (stakeholders); ⇒ normative/prescriptive/proscriptive context (social planners); ⇒ emergent, self organized behaviors (stakeholders).

slide-154
SLIDE 154

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MICRO-MACRO CONFLICT (1)

The micro-macro conflict ingredients: ⇒ formal norms as the outcome of a [global] planning process (social planners); ⇒ social norms as the outcome of local interactions (stakeholders); ⇒ normative/prescriptive/proscriptive context (social planners); ⇒ emergent, self organized behaviors (stakeholders).

slide-155
SLIDE 155

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MICRO-MACRO CONFLICT (1)

The micro-macro conflict ingredients: ⇒ formal norms as the outcome of a [global] planning process (social planners); ⇒ social norms as the outcome of local interactions (stakeholders); ⇒ normative/prescriptive/proscriptive context (social planners); ⇒ emergent, self organized behaviors (stakeholders).

slide-156
SLIDE 156

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MICRO-MACRO CONFLICT (1)

The micro-macro conflict ingredients: ⇒ formal norms as the outcome of a [global] planning process (social planners); ⇒ social norms as the outcome of local interactions (stakeholders); ⇒ normative/prescriptive/proscriptive context (social planners); ⇒ emergent, self organized behaviors (stakeholders).

slide-157
SLIDE 157

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MICRO-MACRO CONFLICT (1)

The micro-macro conflict ingredients: ⇒ formal norms as the outcome of a [global] planning process (social planners); ⇒ social norms as the outcome of local interactions (stakeholders); ⇒ normative/prescriptive/proscriptive context (social planners); ⇒ emergent, self organized behaviors (stakeholders).

slide-158
SLIDE 158

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MICRO-MACRO CONFLICT (1)

The micro-macro conflict ingredients: ⇒ formal norms as the outcome of a [global] planning process (social planners); ⇒ social norms as the outcome of local interactions (stakeholders); ⇒ normative/prescriptive/proscriptive context (social planners); ⇒ emergent, self organized behaviors (stakeholders).

slide-159
SLIDE 159

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MICRO-MACRO CONFLICT (2)

slide-160
SLIDE 160

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MICRO-MACRO CONFLICT (2)

slide-161
SLIDE 161

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MICRO-MACRO CONFLICT (2)

The micro-macro conflict features: ⇒ globally normative/prescriptive/proscriptive intentions (social planners); ⇒ locally self-normative/self-prescriptive intentions (stakeholders); ⇒ clash of wills; ⇒ clash of perspectives, values, interests; ⇒ local versus global, individual versus collective.

slide-162
SLIDE 162

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MICRO-MACRO CONFLICT (2)

The micro-macro conflict features: ⇒ globally normative/prescriptive/proscriptive intentions (social planners); ⇒ locally self-normative/self-prescriptive intentions (stakeholders); ⇒ clash of wills; ⇒ clash of perspectives, values, interests; ⇒ local versus global, individual versus collective.

slide-163
SLIDE 163

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MICRO-MACRO CONFLICT (2)

The micro-macro conflict features: ⇒ globally normative/prescriptive/proscriptive intentions (social planners); ⇒ locally self-normative/self-prescriptive intentions (stakeholders); ⇒ clash of wills; ⇒ clash of perspectives, values, interests; ⇒ local versus global, individual versus collective.

slide-164
SLIDE 164

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MICRO-MACRO CONFLICT (2)

The micro-macro conflict features: ⇒ globally normative/prescriptive/proscriptive intentions (social planners); ⇒ locally self-normative/self-prescriptive intentions (stakeholders); ⇒ clash of wills; ⇒ clash of perspectives, values, interests; ⇒ local versus global, individual versus collective.

slide-165
SLIDE 165

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MICRO-MACRO CONFLICT (2)

The micro-macro conflict features: ⇒ globally normative/prescriptive/proscriptive intentions (social planners); ⇒ locally self-normative/self-prescriptive intentions (stakeholders); ⇒ clash of wills; ⇒ clash of perspectives, values, interests; ⇒ local versus global, individual versus collective.

slide-166
SLIDE 166

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MICRO-MACRO CONFLICT (2)

The micro-macro conflict features: ⇒ globally normative/prescriptive/proscriptive intentions (social planners); ⇒ locally self-normative/self-prescriptive intentions (stakeholders); ⇒ clash of wills; ⇒ clash of perspectives, values, interests; ⇒ local versus global, individual versus collective.

slide-167
SLIDE 167

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MICRO-MACRO CONFLICT (2)

The micro-macro conflict features: ⇒ globally normative/prescriptive/proscriptive intentions (social planners); ⇒ locally self-normative/self-prescriptive intentions (stakeholders); ⇒ clash of wills; ⇒ clash of perspectives, values, interests; ⇒ local versus global, individual versus collective.

slide-168
SLIDE 168

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MICRO-MACRO CONFLICT (3)

slide-169
SLIDE 169

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MICRO-MACRO CONFLICT (3)

slide-170
SLIDE 170

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MICRO-MACRO CONFLICT (3)

The micro-macro solutions (??) ⇒ We do not provide solutions, no general solution exists. ⇒ We tried to give some hints, soft suggestions. ⇒ Hints: correctly identify the policy variables and exert the right educational pressures. ⇒ Hints: ethics as a structuring tool of the interactions at all levels. ⇒ Hints: minimize coercive and punitive tools, use properly the right (material/immaterial) incentives.

slide-171
SLIDE 171

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MICRO-MACRO CONFLICT (3)

The micro-macro solutions (??) ⇒ We do not provide solutions, no general solution exists. ⇒ We tried to give some hints, soft suggestions. ⇒ Hints: correctly identify the policy variables and exert the right educational pressures. ⇒ Hints: ethics as a structuring tool of the interactions at all levels. ⇒ Hints: minimize coercive and punitive tools, use properly the right (material/immaterial) incentives.

slide-172
SLIDE 172

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MICRO-MACRO CONFLICT (3)

The micro-macro solutions (??) ⇒ We do not provide solutions, no general solution exists. ⇒ We tried to give some hints, soft suggestions. ⇒ Hints: correctly identify the policy variables and exert the right educational pressures. ⇒ Hints: ethics as a structuring tool of the interactions at all levels. ⇒ Hints: minimize coercive and punitive tools, use properly the right (material/immaterial) incentives.

slide-173
SLIDE 173

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MICRO-MACRO CONFLICT (3)

The micro-macro solutions (??) ⇒ We do not provide solutions, no general solution exists. ⇒ We tried to give some hints, soft suggestions. ⇒ Hints: correctly identify the policy variables and exert the right educational pressures. ⇒ Hints: ethics as a structuring tool of the interactions at all levels. ⇒ Hints: minimize coercive and punitive tools, use properly the right (material/immaterial) incentives.

slide-174
SLIDE 174

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MICRO-MACRO CONFLICT (3)

The micro-macro solutions (??) ⇒ We do not provide solutions, no general solution exists. ⇒ We tried to give some hints, soft suggestions. ⇒ Hints: correctly identify the policy variables and exert the right educational pressures. ⇒ Hints: ethics as a structuring tool of the interactions at all levels. ⇒ Hints: minimize coercive and punitive tools, use properly the right (material/immaterial) incentives.

slide-175
SLIDE 175

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MICRO-MACRO CONFLICT (3)

The micro-macro solutions (??) ⇒ We do not provide solutions, no general solution exists. ⇒ We tried to give some hints, soft suggestions. ⇒ Hints: correctly identify the policy variables and exert the right educational pressures. ⇒ Hints: ethics as a structuring tool of the interactions at all levels. ⇒ Hints: minimize coercive and punitive tools, use properly the right (material/immaterial) incentives.

slide-176
SLIDE 176

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

THE MICRO-MACRO CONFLICT (3)

The micro-macro solutions (??) ⇒ We do not provide solutions, no general solution exists. ⇒ We tried to give some hints, soft suggestions. ⇒ Hints: correctly identify the policy variables and exert the right educational pressures. ⇒ Hints: ethics as a structuring tool of the interactions at all levels. ⇒ Hints: minimize coercive and punitive tools, use properly the right (material/immaterial) incentives.

slide-177
SLIDE 177

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

CONCLUSIONS: THE BRIGHT SIDE

slide-178
SLIDE 178

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

CONCLUSIONS: THE BRIGHT SIDE

slide-179
SLIDE 179

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

CONCLUSIONS: THE BRIGHT SIDE

What this thesis is: ⇒ it represents an attempt to structure the micro-macro conflict (a central topic of sociological research); ⇒ it provides an hopefully new perspective in which to frame the micro-macro conflict; ⇒ it suggests the crucial reasons of the conflict; ⇒ it gives some hints on how to face and possibly solve them.

slide-180
SLIDE 180

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

CONCLUSIONS: THE BRIGHT SIDE

What this thesis is: ⇒ it represents an attempt to structure the micro-macro conflict (a central topic of sociological research); ⇒ it provides an hopefully new perspective in which to frame the micro-macro conflict; ⇒ it suggests the crucial reasons of the conflict; ⇒ it gives some hints on how to face and possibly solve them.

slide-181
SLIDE 181

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

CONCLUSIONS: THE BRIGHT SIDE

What this thesis is: ⇒ it represents an attempt to structure the micro-macro conflict (a central topic of sociological research); ⇒ it provides an hopefully new perspective in which to frame the micro-macro conflict; ⇒ it suggests the crucial reasons of the conflict; ⇒ it gives some hints on how to face and possibly solve them.

slide-182
SLIDE 182

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

CONCLUSIONS: THE BRIGHT SIDE

What this thesis is: ⇒ it represents an attempt to structure the micro-macro conflict (a central topic of sociological research); ⇒ it provides an hopefully new perspective in which to frame the micro-macro conflict; ⇒ it suggests the crucial reasons of the conflict; ⇒ it gives some hints on how to face and possibly solve them.

slide-183
SLIDE 183

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

CONCLUSIONS: THE BRIGHT SIDE

What this thesis is: ⇒ it represents an attempt to structure the micro-macro conflict (a central topic of sociological research); ⇒ it provides an hopefully new perspective in which to frame the micro-macro conflict; ⇒ it suggests the crucial reasons of the conflict; ⇒ it gives some hints on how to face and possibly solve them.

slide-184
SLIDE 184

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

CONCLUSIONS: THE BRIGHT SIDE

What this thesis is: ⇒ it represents an attempt to structure the micro-macro conflict (a central topic of sociological research); ⇒ it provides an hopefully new perspective in which to frame the micro-macro conflict; ⇒ it suggests the crucial reasons of the conflict; ⇒ it gives some hints on how to face and possibly solve them.

slide-185
SLIDE 185

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

CONCLUSIONS: THE DARK SIDE

slide-186
SLIDE 186

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

CONCLUSIONS: THE DARK SIDE

slide-187
SLIDE 187

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

CONCLUSIONS: THE DARK SIDE

[Some] negative features of the thesis: ⇒ no general solution to the micro-macro conflict (but nobody has ever proved either the existence or the unicity of a solution); ⇒ no general approach; ⇒ many open paths and dead ends; ⇒ many dangling references and false starts.

slide-188
SLIDE 188

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

CONCLUSIONS: THE DARK SIDE

[Some] negative features of the thesis: ⇒ no general solution to the micro-macro conflict (but nobody has ever proved either the existence or the unicity of a solution); ⇒ no general approach; ⇒ many open paths and dead ends; ⇒ many dangling references and false starts.

slide-189
SLIDE 189

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

CONCLUSIONS: THE DARK SIDE

[Some] negative features of the thesis: ⇒ no general solution to the micro-macro conflict (but nobody has ever proved either the existence or the unicity of a solution); ⇒ no general approach; ⇒ many open paths and dead ends; ⇒ many dangling references and false starts.

slide-190
SLIDE 190

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

CONCLUSIONS: THE DARK SIDE

[Some] negative features of the thesis: ⇒ no general solution to the micro-macro conflict (but nobody has ever proved either the existence or the unicity of a solution); ⇒ no general approach; ⇒ many open paths and dead ends; ⇒ many dangling references and false starts.

slide-191
SLIDE 191

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

CONCLUSIONS: THE DARK SIDE

[Some] negative features of the thesis: ⇒ no general solution to the micro-macro conflict (but nobody has ever proved either the existence or the unicity of a solution); ⇒ no general approach; ⇒ many open paths and dead ends; ⇒ many dangling references and false starts.

slide-192
SLIDE 192

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

CONCLUSIONS: THE DARK SIDE

[Some] negative features of the thesis: ⇒ no general solution to the micro-macro conflict (but nobody has ever proved either the existence or the unicity of a solution); ⇒ no general approach; ⇒ many open paths and dead ends; ⇒ many dangling references and false starts.

slide-193
SLIDE 193

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

AT THE END WE WERE BACK TO SEE AGAIN THE STARS...

slide-194
SLIDE 194

Introduction The preliminaries The main body Conclusions

AT THE END WE WERE BACK TO SEE AGAIN THE STARS...