Phase diagram andfrustration of decoherence inYshaped Josephson - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

phase diagram and frustration of decoherence in y shaped
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Phase diagram andfrustration of decoherence inYshaped Josephson - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Phase diagram andfrustration of decoherence inYshaped Josephson junction networks Firenze,October 2008


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Phase diagram andfrustration of decoherence inYshaped Josephson junction networks

Firenze,October 2008 Firenze,October 2008

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Main idea YShaped networkofJosephson junction chains (YJJN)with amagnetic frustration⇒ ⇒ ⇒ ⇒Finitecoupling fixed point (FFP)inthephase diagram; YJJNworkingnear theFFP⇒ ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ Frustration of decoherence intheemerging twolevel quantum system(2LQS); Application:engineering ofareduceddecoherence 2LQS. Technology:renormalization group+boundary conformal field theory.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Planofthetalk: 1.TheYJJNas ajunction ofcharged,onedimensional, bosonic systems; 2.Theparameters andthephase diagram oftheYJJN: weakly coupled andstrongly coupled fixed points; 3.Emergence ofaFFPinthephase diagram; 5.Spectral densityandfrustration ofdecoherence inthe YJJNworkingnear theFFP; 6.Conclusions,possibleapplications,perspectives. 4.Current’spatter intheYJJNnear thefixed points:the YJJNas a“quantumswitch”;

slide-4
SLIDE 4

1.TheYJJNandits fieldtheoretical description

ϕ2 ϕ3

EJ EJ EJ

Φ

1

ϕ

λ λ λ

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Central region Hamiltonian

[ ]

∑ ∑

= + − =

  • +

−       − ∂ ∂ − =

+

  • ϕ

φ φ

φ

EC>>EJ ⇒

⇒ ⇒ ⇒ Effective (3)spin Hamiltonian

  • +

+ =

− ∂ ∂ − =

  • φ
  • φ

=

+

{ }

∑ ∑

= − + + =

  • +

− − =

  • ϕ
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Lowenergy eigenstates (h>EJ)

↑↑↑

= ε

  • ↓↑↑

+ ↑↓↑ + ↑↑↓

  • ϕ

ε

− =

  • ↓↑↑

− ↑↓↑ − ↑↑↓

− π π

  • π

ϕ ε − − − =

  • ↓↑↑

− ↑↓↑ − ↑↑↓

− π π

  • π

ϕ ε + − − =

  • Only these states will be kept intheeffective theory
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Charge tunneling atthe“inner boundaries”

  • φ

φ λ∑

=

− − =

“Weak tunneling”limit:λ<<h,EJ ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ ⇒SchriefferWolff transformation ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ ⇒Boundary interactionterm

= −

+ − =

+

  • γ

φ φ

  • ϕ

ϕ λ + ≈

  • ϕ

γ =

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Effective field theory ofaJJchain

(L. I.Glazman andA.I.Larkin,PRL79,3736(1997), D.GiulianoandP.Sodano,NPB711,480(2005))

[ ]

∑ ∑ ∑ ∑

= + +

             − + − −         − ∂ ∂ − =

  • φ

φ φ

Mapping onto spin chain+JordanWigner fermions+Bosonization ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ ⇒Luttinger liquid (LL)effective Hamiltonian

∑ ∫

=

                          ∂ Φ ∂ +         ∂ Φ ∂ =

  • π

(N=n+1/2)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

LLparameters andboundary conditions Weak boundary coupling (EW/EJ <<1)⇒ ⇒ ⇒ ⇒Neumann boundary conditions attheinner boundary (∂Φ(k)(0)/∂x=0); Coupling to thebulksuperconductors ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ ⇒Dirichlet boundary conditions attheouter boundary Φ(k)(L)=√2(2πn(k)+φ(k));

  • +

+ − + =

+ =

  • =

= π

=

slide-10
SLIDE 10

“Normal”fields

=

Φ =

  • Φ

− Φ = χ

  • Φ

− Φ + Φ = χ

  • π

ϕ ϕ χ + − =

  • π

φ φ φ χ + − + =

Boundary Hamiltonian

  • +

+

=

=

γ χ α

       − − = − = =

  • α

α α

slide-11
SLIDE 11

(Dynamical)boundary conditions attheinner boundary

  • =

+

∂ ∂

γ χ α α χ π

  • Weakly coupled FP
  • =

∂ ∂

  • χ
  • Strongly coupled FP

Minimumof HBou

slide-12
SLIDE 12

2.Phase diagram oftheYJJN:weakly andstrongly coupled fixed points Weakly coupled fixed point

  • +

+ + + =

π

α π ξ χ

Modeexpansion for theplasmon fields

  • ϕ

ϕ ξ − =

  • φ

φ φ ξ − + =

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • τ

χ α τ χ α τ χ α

τ τ

O.P.E. between boundary vertices: Dimensionless boundary coupling G(L)=LEW(a/L)1/g

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Secondorder renormalization group equations

( )

γ γ γ

+ − =

  • γ

+ − =

  • γ

γ − =

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Phase diagram

γ g<1 1<g<9/4 G γ 9/4<g

2π/3 π/3 2π/3 π/3 π/3 2π/3

γ

*g<1:stable fixed point atG=γ=0;fixed lines atγ=0,π/3,2π/3.

*1<g<9/4:strongly coupled fixed point for γ≠π/3;finitecoupling fixed point for γ=π/3. *9/4<g:strongly coupled stable FP

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Strongly coupled fixed point G>∞ ⇒

⇒ ⇒ ⇒Dirichlet boundary conditions attheinner boundary,as well.(χ1(0), χ2(0))span atriangular lattice, depending onthevalue ofγ

sublattice A sublattice B sublattice C

For γ=π/3theminima lie onahoneycomb lattice(merging oftwo triangular sublattices)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Modeexpansion oftheplasmon fields attheSFP

      + + + =

  • π

α π π π θ ψ

  • Dual fields

      − − + =

  • π

α π π ξ χ

slide-18
SLIDE 18

For γ≠kπ+π /3theminimaspan only oneofthethree sublattices :inthis case,theleading boundary perturbation is given by acombination of“long”V instantons.

    

  • ±

= τ ψ ρ τ

=

+ − =

  • !
  • The“Vinstanton” operators have conformal dimension

hS(g)=4g/3:for ¾<g<1(andfor γ≠kπ+π/3)both the weakly coupled andthestrongly coupled fixed point is stable (repulsiveFFP).

− = − = = ρ ρ ρ

slide-19
SLIDE 19

3.Emergence ofastable finitecoupling fixed point For γ=kπ+π /3two triangular sublattices become degenerateinenergy:they merge to form ahoneycomb lattice.Inthis case,theleading boundary perturbation is given by acombination of“short”Winstanton.

    

  • ±

= τ ψ α τ

  • +

− =

= +

τ ς

τ+,τ areeffective isospin operators,connecting sites on inequivalent sublattices

slide-20
SLIDE 20

The“Winstanton” operators have conformal dimension hF(g)=4g/9:for 1<g<9/4neither theweakly coupled,

  • rthestrongly coupled fixed point is stable:theIR

behavior ofthesystemis driven by an attractive FFP Perturbative renormalization group equation for the running coupling strength

  • ζ

ζ ζ −       − =

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Lattice B Lattice C W−instanton Lattice A V−instanton

slide-22
SLIDE 22

4.Current patternnear the(WandS)fixed points

  • β

β β β β β β β ∂ ∂ − =       ∂ ∂ + ∂ ∂ − =       ∂ ∂ + ∂ ∂ =

  • "
  • "
  • "
  • ϕ

ϕ β − =

  • ϕ

ϕ ϕ β − + =

Current:logarithmic derivatives ofthepartition function Z

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Weakly coupled fixed point

Perturbative calculation:theresult is the“typical” sinusoidal behavior,as afunction oftheapplied phase differences

[ ] [ ] [ ]

  • γ

β α γ β α γ β α γ β α γ β α γ β α +

+

  • =

+

+

  • =

+

+

  • =
  • "
  • "
  • "
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Zeromode contribution to theenergy eigenvalues

                + + +       + + = + =

  • π

β ε π β π

  • #

$

= = =

  • %

ε ε ε

Strongly coupled fixed point

Onafinitesize systemthis breaks thedegeneracy between theminimaoftheboundary potential (labelled by then’s)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Themain contribution to thetotalcurrent comes from the zeromodeterm inthetotalenergy:this implies abrupt jumps (perturbatively rounded by Vinstantons)atthe degeneracy between two eigenvalues

      + + − =             + + +       + − =             + + +       + =

  • "
  • "
  • "

π β π β π β π β π β

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Tuning two eigenstates ofthezeromodeoperatornear by adegeneracy ⇒

⇒ ⇒ ⇒ effective twolevel quantumdevice For instance:setting

  • <

< − π β

δ π β + − =

       <<      

  • π

δ

Thefollowing two states define an effective 2LQD

↓> ↑> ≡ > >

  • %

%

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Operating thesystemas aquantumswitch

δ ∗

2 3 1

=| >

Strong coupling

a) b)

1

I =I =−2I

2 3

δ2 (δ =0)

1

2 3 1

=| >

δ2 measures thedetuning

  • ffthe

degeneracy: acting onthis parameter

  • nemakes

thesystem “switch” between the two states

slide-28
SLIDE 28

5.Thesystemworkingnear theFFP:current patternandfrustration ofdecoherence

Though it is possible to setupaselfconsistent formalism to formally derivethecurrent patternnear theFFP,a closedformula canbe given only for g=9/4ε,with ε<<1. Inthis case,onemay settheparameters as

π α

  • =

δ π δ β β + − = + ≈

  • ε

ζ ≈

Thecurrent patternnear theFFP

slide-29
SLIDE 29
  • β

β ζ β α α π δ π β ζ β α α π δ π

  • "
  • "
  • "

=         −         + + − − =         −         + + − =

Current across thethree arms

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Again,this is a smoothened sawtoothlike behavior but, now,it is associated to a stable FP

δ ∗ δ1 (δ =0)

2

1 2

I =−I

2 3 1

=| >

Finite coupling

a) b)

2 3 1

=| >

slide-31
SLIDE 31

We relate thedecoherence to theentanglement ofthe systemwith theplasmon bath ⇒

⇒ ⇒ ⇒ spectral densityof

states oftheeffective 2LQD,Χ”(\)/\

(E.Novais et al.,Phys.Rev. B72,014417(2005))

(Ω) (Ω) (Ω) (Ω)

+−

χ [ ]

RPA

(Ω)

+−

χ [ ]

RPA

  • =

+

[ ] χ +−

(0)

[ ] χ +− = [ ] χ +−

(0)

a) b) ζ ζ

slide-32
SLIDE 32

ε

ε ς β χ

  • +

> − − − Γ −

> = >

  • &%
  • ς

β β + =

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Using theRPAapproximation sketched above yields

(Ω)/Ω

χ ’’

NFP DFP FFP

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Near theSFP:noentanglement between the2LQDandthe bath,but noquantumtunneling between thestates either (noenergy renormalization); Near theWFP:fullentanglement between the2LQDand thebath (fulldecoherence); NeartheFFP:consistent(androbust)tunnelsplittingof thetwostates,withan accettable level of(frustrated) decoherence

slide-35
SLIDE 35

6.Conclusions

  • 1. AYshaped JJnetwork may exhibit aFFPinits phase

diagram;

  • 2. AttheFFPan effective 2levelquantumdevices

emerges,with enhanced quantumcoherence;

  • 3. Relevant issues for apractical realization:stabilizing

γ,applying theexternal phases,controlling other sources ofnoise…