Phase diagram andfrustration of decoherence inYshaped Josephson junction networks
Firenze,October 2008 Firenze,October 2008
Phase diagram andfrustration of decoherence inYshaped Josephson - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Phase diagram andfrustration of decoherence inYshaped Josephson junction networks Firenze,October 2008
Firenze,October 2008 Firenze,October 2008
Main idea YShaped networkofJosephson junction chains (YJJN)with amagnetic frustration⇒ ⇒ ⇒ ⇒Finitecoupling fixed point (FFP)inthephase diagram; YJJNworkingnear theFFP⇒ ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ Frustration of decoherence intheemerging twolevel quantum system(2LQS); Application:engineering ofareduceddecoherence 2LQS. Technology:renormalization group+boundary conformal field theory.
Planofthetalk: 1.TheYJJNas ajunction ofcharged,onedimensional, bosonic systems; 2.Theparameters andthephase diagram oftheYJJN: weakly coupled andstrongly coupled fixed points; 3.Emergence ofaFFPinthephase diagram; 5.Spectral densityandfrustration ofdecoherence inthe YJJNworkingnear theFFP; 6.Conclusions,possibleapplications,perspectives. 4.Current’spatter intheYJJNnear thefixed points:the YJJNas a“quantumswitch”;
1.TheYJJNandits fieldtheoretical description
ϕ2 ϕ3
EJ EJ EJ
Φ
1
ϕ
λ λ λ
Central region Hamiltonian
= + − =
− − ∂ ∂ − =
+
φ φ
φ
EC>>EJ ⇒
⇒ ⇒ ⇒ Effective (3)spin Hamiltonian
+ =
− ∂ ∂ − =
+
= − + + =
Lowenergy eigenstates (h>EJ)
↑↑↑
+ ↑↓↑ + ↑↑↓
ε
− =
− ↑↓↑ − ↑↑↓
− π π
ϕ ε − − − =
− ↑↓↑ − ↑↑↓
− π π
ϕ ε + − − =
Charge tunneling atthe“inner boundaries”
φ λ∑
=
− − =
“Weak tunneling”limit:λ<<h,EJ ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ ⇒SchriefferWolff transformation ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ ⇒Boundary interactionterm
= −
+ − =
+
φ φ
ϕ λ + ≈
γ =
Effective field theory ofaJJchain
(L. I.Glazman andA.I.Larkin,PRL79,3736(1997), D.GiulianoandP.Sodano,NPB711,480(2005))
[ ]
= + +
− + − − − ∂ ∂ − =
φ φ
Mapping onto spin chain+JordanWigner fermions+Bosonization ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ ⇒Luttinger liquid (LL)effective Hamiltonian
=
∂ Φ ∂ + ∂ Φ ∂ =
(N=n+1/2)
LLparameters andboundary conditions Weak boundary coupling (EW/EJ <<1)⇒ ⇒ ⇒ ⇒Neumann boundary conditions attheinner boundary (∂Φ(k)(0)/∂x=0); Coupling to thebulksuperconductors ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ ⇒Dirichlet boundary conditions attheouter boundary Φ(k)(L)=√2(2πn(k)+φ(k));
+ − + =
= π
=
“Normal”fields
=
Φ =
− Φ = χ
− Φ + Φ = χ
ϕ ϕ χ + − =
φ φ φ χ + − + =
Boundary Hamiltonian
=
− − = − = =
α α
(Dynamical)boundary conditions attheinner boundary
Minimumof HBou
2.Phase diagram oftheYJJN:weakly andstrongly coupled fixed points Weakly coupled fixed point
+ + + =
π
α π ξ χ
Modeexpansion for theplasmon fields
ϕ ξ − =
φ φ ξ − + =
χ α τ χ α τ χ α
−
O.P.E. between boundary vertices: Dimensionless boundary coupling G(L)=LEW(a/L)1/g
Secondorder renormalization group equations
γ γ γ
Phase diagram
γ g<1 1<g<9/4 G γ 9/4<g
2π/3 π/3 2π/3 π/3 π/3 2π/3
γ
*g<1:stable fixed point atG=γ=0;fixed lines atγ=0,π/3,2π/3.
*1<g<9/4:strongly coupled fixed point for γ≠π/3;finitecoupling fixed point for γ=π/3. *9/4<g:strongly coupled stable FP
Strongly coupled fixed point G>∞ ⇒
⇒ ⇒ ⇒Dirichlet boundary conditions attheinner boundary,as well.(χ1(0), χ2(0))span atriangular lattice, depending onthevalue ofγ
sublattice A sublattice B sublattice C
For γ=π/3theminima lie onahoneycomb lattice(merging oftwo triangular sublattices)
Modeexpansion oftheplasmon fields attheSFP
+ + + =
−
α π π π θ ψ
− − + =
α π π ξ χ
For γ≠kπ+π /3theminimaspan only oneofthethree sublattices :inthis case,theleading boundary perturbation is given by acombination of“long”V instantons.
= τ ψ ρ τ
=
hS(g)=4g/3:for ¾<g<1(andfor γ≠kπ+π/3)both the weakly coupled andthestrongly coupled fixed point is stable (repulsiveFFP).
− = − = = ρ ρ ρ
3.Emergence ofastable finitecoupling fixed point For γ=kπ+π /3two triangular sublattices become degenerateinenergy:they merge to form ahoneycomb lattice.Inthis case,theleading boundary perturbation is given by acombination of“short”Winstanton.
= τ ψ α τ
− =
= +
τ ς
τ+,τ areeffective isospin operators,connecting sites on inequivalent sublattices
The“Winstanton” operators have conformal dimension hF(g)=4g/9:for 1<g<9/4neither theweakly coupled,
behavior ofthesystemis driven by an attractive FFP Perturbative renormalization group equation for the running coupling strength
Lattice B Lattice C W−instanton Lattice A V−instanton
4.Current patternnear the(WandS)fixed points
β β β β β β β ∂ ∂ − = ∂ ∂ + ∂ ∂ − = ∂ ∂ + ∂ ∂ =
ϕ β − =
ϕ ϕ β − + =
Current:logarithmic derivatives ofthepartition function Z
Weakly coupled fixed point
Perturbative calculation:theresult is the“typical” sinusoidal behavior,as afunction oftheapplied phase differences
Zeromode contribution to theenergy eigenvalues
+ + + + + = + =
β ε π β π
$
Strongly coupled fixed point
Onafinitesize systemthis breaks thedegeneracy between theminimaoftheboundary potential (labelled by then’s)
Themain contribution to thetotalcurrent comes from the zeromodeterm inthetotalenergy:this implies abrupt jumps (perturbatively rounded by Vinstantons)atthe degeneracy between two eigenvalues
+ + − = + + + + − = + + + + =
π β π β π β π β π β
Tuning two eigenstates ofthezeromodeoperatornear by adegeneracy ⇒
⇒ ⇒ ⇒ effective twolevel quantumdevice For instance:setting
δ π β + − =
<<
δ
Thefollowing two states define an effective 2LQD
%
Operating thesystemas aquantumswitch
δ ∗
2 3 1
=| >
Strong coupling
a) b)
1
I =I =−2I
2 3
δ2 (δ =0)
1
2 3 1
=| >
δ2 measures thedetuning
degeneracy: acting onthis parameter
thesystem “switch” between the two states
5.Thesystemworkingnear theFFP:current patternandfrustration ofdecoherence
Though it is possible to setupaselfconsistent formalism to formally derivethecurrent patternnear theFFP,a closedformula canbe given only for g=9/4ε,with ε<<1. Inthis case,onemay settheparameters as
Thecurrent patternnear theFFP
β ζ β α α π δ π β ζ β α α π δ π
= − + + − − = − + + − =
Current across thethree arms
Again,this is a smoothened sawtoothlike behavior but, now,it is associated to a stable FP
δ ∗ δ1 (δ =0)
2
1 2
I =−I
2 3 1
=| >
Finite coupling
a) b)
2 3 1
=| >
We relate thedecoherence to theentanglement ofthe systemwith theplasmon bath ⇒
⇒ ⇒ ⇒ spectral densityof
states oftheeffective 2LQD,Χ”(\)/\
(E.Novais et al.,Phys.Rev. B72,014417(2005))
(Ω) (Ω) (Ω) (Ω)
+−
χ [ ]
RPA
(Ω)
+−
χ [ ]
RPA
+
[ ] χ +−
(0)
[ ] χ +− = [ ] χ +−
(0)
a) b) ζ ζ
ε
⊥
Using theRPAapproximation sketched above yields
(Ω)/Ω
χ ’’
NFP DFP FFP
Ω
Near theSFP:noentanglement between the2LQDandthe bath,but noquantumtunneling between thestates either (noenergy renormalization); Near theWFP:fullentanglement between the2LQDand thebath (fulldecoherence); NeartheFFP:consistent(androbust)tunnelsplittingof thetwostates,withan accettable level of(frustrated) decoherence
6.Conclusions
diagram;
emerges,with enhanced quantumcoherence;
γ,applying theexternal phases,controlling other sources ofnoise…