PESTICIDE PARTITIONING WITHIN A SURFACTANT-AIDED SOIL WASHING - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

pesticide partitioning within a surfactant aided soil
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

PESTICIDE PARTITIONING WITHIN A SURFACTANT-AIDED SOIL WASHING - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

PESTICIDE PARTITIONING WITHIN A SURFACTANT-AIDED SOIL WASHING SYSTEM Paloma Martina D. Cuartero Chemical Engineering Contra Costa Community College Lab Mentor: Peng Wang Faculty Advisor: Prof. Arturo Keller Funded by: US Department of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

PESTICIDE PARTITIONING WITHIN A SURFACTANT-AIDED SOIL WASHING SYSTEM

Paloma Martina D. Cuartero Chemical Engineering Contra Costa Community College Lab Mentor: Peng Wang Faculty Advisor: Prof. Arturo Keller Funded by: US Department of Interior

slide-2
SLIDE 2

BACKGROUND

Pesticide Contamination Surfactants

Surfactants in water/soil system is present as:

Monomers; Micelles, which are aggregates of the monomers and form

when the monomer concentration reaches the Critical Micelle Concentration (CMC) value;

Sorbed surfactants in the soil particles

Monomer Conc. = CMC

Monomer Micelle

slide-3
SLIDE 3

OBJECTIVE

To investigate pesticide partitioning behavior

within a surfactant-aided soil washing system. WHAT WE DID…

Study the sorption behaviors of pesticides and surfactants

  • nto soil particles;

Study the pesticide sorption in the presence of surfactants; Investigate the effect of surfactants on desorption of

pesticides.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

MATERIALS

Soil Samples

Agriculture (Ag)#1, Ag#2,

Ag#3

Clayey Sediment

Pesticides

Atrazine Diuron

  • Surfactants

Triton (Nonionic) Linear Alkyl Sulfate (LAS) Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate

(SDS) (Anionic)

Benzalkonium Chloride

(BC) (Cationic)

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Batch Equilibrium Technique was used to conduct all

sorption and desorption experiment. Procedure:

  • 1. Weigh 2grams of soil
  • 2. Add various amounts of pesticide and surfactant
  • 3. Mix for about 20 hours
  • 4. Centrifuge the samples
  • 5. Analyze the aqueous phase using High Performance

Liquid Chromatography

METHOD

High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

RESULTS

Diuron sorption in the absence of surfactant

20 40 60 5 10 15 20 25

Aqueous conc. (mg/l) Sorbed conc (mg/kg) Ag#1 Ag#2 Ag#3 Clayey Sediment

Triton sorption

0.E+00 2.E+04 3.E+04 5.E+04 5 10 15 20 25

Triton aqueous conc (g/l) Triton sorbed conc. (mg/kg) Ag#1 Ag#2 Ag#3 Clayey Sediment

  • Soil organic matter (SOM)

and the soil clay content are the dominant parameters in terms of pesticide sorption.

  • The triton sorption shows

an increase then starts to level off.

  • BC, LAS, and SDS shows

the same sorption pattern but to a different extent.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Diuron sorption in the presence of Triton (Diuron: 15.95ppm)

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 5 10 15 20 25 Triton aqueous conc. (g/l) Diuron aqueous conc. (mg/l)

Ag#1 Ag#2 Ag#3 Clayey Sediment

  • In presence of low concentration surfactants, the concentration of

pesticide in the sorbed phase increases.

sorbed phase aqueous phase

slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Diuron sorption in the presence of BC (Diuron conc.: 15.95ppm)

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 5 10 15 20 25

BC aqueous equilbrium conc. (g/l) Diuron aqueous conc. (mg/l) Ag#1 Ag#2 Ag#3 Clayey Sediment

BC, being a cationic surfactant, sorbs more into the soil particles which explains the much lower Diuron aqueous concentration at the first stage.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Diuron desorption in the presence of Triton (2.0267 g/l)

20 40 60 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Diuron aqueous conc. (mg/l) Diuron sorbed conc. (mg/kg) Ag#1 Ag#2 Ag#3 Clayey Sediment Ag#1 (water)

Comparing Ag#1 and Ag#1(water), the enhanced desorption happened after cycle #2.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

CONCLUSION

  • The presence of surfactant has a significant effect in the

pesticide partitioning within the soil washing system

  • Different surfactants have different potential to enhance

pesticide desorption. This enhancement is surfactant and soil dependent.

  • The enhanced desorption happens only if the surfactant

concentration is higher than a certain value which is also surfactant and soil dependent.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

FUTURE PLANS

  • Statistical Analysis on the experimental data to determine

which parameters are dominant in terms of surfactant sorption.

  • Conduct Batch Experiments to investigate the effect of

surfactant on dispersion of soil particles especially of soil colloidal particles (<2µm).

slide-13
SLIDE 13

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Peng Wang

  • Prof. Arturo Keller

Samantha Freeman, Liu-Yen Kramer

  • Dr. Nick Arnold, Andrew Morill, & Evelyn Hu

Internships in NanoScience, Engineering and Technology (INSET) California NanoSystems Institute (CNSI) Center for Science Excellence (CSE) University of Santa Barbara (UCSB) Contra Costa College

slide-14
SLIDE 14

QUESTIONS?

slide-15
SLIDE 15

sorbed phase aqueous phase

soil particle Sorbed surfactant pesticide

slide-16
SLIDE 16

chemicals silica particulate hydrophobic less hydrophobic

slide-17
SLIDE 17

SOIL PROPERTIES

56.8% 28.2% 15.0% Clayey 83.9% 58.4% 57.8% 75.5% Sand 13.0% 3.1% Sediment 16.4% 25.5% Ag#3 23.4% 18.8% Ag#2 13.5% 11.0% Ag#1 Silt Clay