peridynamics analysis of the wear process of thin films
play

Peridynamics Analysis of the Wear Process of Thin Films of Hard Disk - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CML 26 th Annual Sponsors Meeting January 27 th , 2014 Peridynamics Analysis of the Wear Process of Thin Films of Hard Disk Drives Sayna Ebrahimi Advisors: Professors K. Komvopoulos and D. Steigmann Outline Motivation Introduction


  1. CML 26 th Annual Sponsors’ Meeting January 27 th , 2014 Peridynamics Analysis of the Wear Process of Thin Films of Hard ‐ Disk Drives Sayna Ebrahimi Advisors: Professors K. Komvopoulos and D. Steigmann

  2. Outline • Motivation • Introduction • Peridynamics Theory • Asperity Sliding Contact Simulations • Conclusions

  3. Motivation • Why wear analysis of thin films ? The key role of the thin ‐ film overcoat is to:  protect the magnetic medium from wear and corrosion  reduce frictional interaction between surface asperities • Why contact of asperities matters?  It controls the longevity of the thin ‐ film overcoat  It may cause surface damage/wear and, in turn, data loss  It affects the operation efficiency and lifetime of the hard drive

  4. Computational Methods Continuum Mechanics: Molecular Dynamics: o Cannot apply PDEs directly in the presence of a structural discontinuity (e.g., defect). o Its accuracy depends on the assumed o Significant discretization refinement is potential function necessary at large strain ‐ gradient locations(e.g., contact region and film interface). o Time consuming o A pre ‐ existing defect or specified crack path must be assumed to model material removal o Size (scale) and boundary condition restrictions o Breaks down at the nanoscale Why Peridynamics?  No potential function dependency  No assumption of a pre ‐ existing defect; damage occurs when the material is energetically favorable to fail  No mathematical difficulty caused by solving PDEs  Ideal for cyclic deformation/fatigue analysis

  5. What is Peridynamics? Peridynamics is a continuum version of Molecular Dynamics � �� � , �� � � � � � � � � , � � � � � �� � � � � ��� � , �� �  Each particle x interacts with a finite number of Horizon particles ( family of x ) in the body within a certain distance, referred to as the “ horizon ”  Replaces PDEs with integral equations and utilizes same set of equations everywhere � �  When bonds stretch beyond a critical distance, they break, simulating material separation  Force function contains the constitutive model z � �  For particles more than the horizon radius apart � � � (similar to the cutoff radius in MD) x y

  6. Bond ‐ based & State ‐ based Peridynamics (PD) Elastic, Elastic ‐ Plastic, and Plastic Materials • Bond ‐ based PD : The interaction between each pair of particles is independent of all the others. • State ‐ based PD: It incorporates features of the material response, including damage evolution, that involve the collective behavior of all the points with which a given point � interacts. • High ‐ accuracy description of irreversible permanent deformation. A “State of order � ” is a function T . ∶ � → � � � � denotes the set of all tensors of order � State ‐ based

  7. Peridynamics Fundamentals � � � � � � � Relative position vector: � � ��� � , �� � ��� � , �� Relative displacement vector: � : Original bond length in reference configuration � � � : Bond length in current configuration � �, �, � � � � � � � Bond stretch: � Peridynamic Horizon

  8. Bond ‐ based Peridynamics � �� � �� � , �� � � � � � � � � , � � � � � �� � � � � ��� � , �� ��� �� � � �, � � � � �, �, � Pair ‐ wise force function: �� � �� � � � � �, �, � � Bond Stretch: � �: represents linear or ��� � � Micro ‐ modulus function: K: bulk modulus �� � nonlinear bond stretching (elastic stiffness ) Critical Bond Stretch: � � �, �, � � � �� � �� ��� � , �, � � �� and � are material ‐ � ��� � � ��� � � , �, � in � dependent properties. Brittle material Ductile material

  9. State ‐ based Peridynamics � �� � �� � , �� � � � � � , � �� � � � � � � � � � , � �� � � � � � �� � � � � ��� � , �� ��� � � � � �� � �� � � � � � 0 Deformed direction vector state: ���� = � 0 ��������� � � 3�� � � �� � � � � Scalar state field: � � � � � ������� ������ Weighted volume: � � � � �, � ��� � � � � � � Extension scalar state: 3 Dilation: � �, � � � � � � ������� ������ � � � � � 15� �

  10. Peridynamics Discretization Theory lends itself to a mesh ‐ free numerical method  No elements  Changing connectivity  Bond breakage occurs irreversibly when a bond exceeds its prescribed critical stretch Velocity ‐ Verlet Algorithm to track particles: � � � ∆� � � � � � � . ∆� � 1 2 � � . ∆� � � � � ∆�/2 � � � � 1 2 � � . ∆� � � � 1 � � � ��� � �� � �, � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ���

  11. Computational Tools for PD • LAMMPS (Large ‐ scale Atomic/Molecular Massively Parallel Simulator)  open ‐ source (http://lammps.sandia.gov)  Provides (nonlocal) continuum mechanics simulation capability within an MD code  Fast parallel implementation capability  Capable of modeling prototype microelastic brittle (PMB), Linear peridynamic solid (LPS) models and viscoplastic model  General boundary conditions  Material inhomogeneity • Costume ‐ made codes: Can be easily parallelized through different processors: reduces computational expenses drastically. A personal observation… Time from starting implementation of LAMMPS But other numerical methods?! to run first numerical experiment with PD: two weeks

  12. PD Simulations of Asperity Sliding Contact Moving layer and asperity • Asperity deformation due to sliding contact • Asperities have the same � and  • Periodic boundary conditions in x ‐ y plane • Lattice constant: � � �. � �� • Asperity Radius = ��� • Radius of neighborhood: � � �� • Critical Bond stretch = �� Fixed layer and asperity • Time step : �. ���� ��

  13. Sliding Speed Effect on Asperity Deformation ⁄ � � � �� � ���. �� �� � � ��� ��. �� �� ��. �� �� ���. �� �� ⁄ � � � �� �

  14. Sliding Speed Effect on Asperity Deformation (Animated File) � � � ��/� � � � ��/�

  15. Asperities Mass Reduction After Each Sliding Pass

  16. Asperity Radius Effect � � �� t = �. ���� �� t = �. ���� �� t = �. ���� �� ⁄ � � � �� � t = � � � ���

  17. Asperity Interference Effect (Animated Files)

  18. Conclusions Advantages of Peridynamics • Continuum mechanics cannot model nanoscale damage phenomena (e.g., wear) • Damage is self guided! • No material separation (crack) path is needed; local material separation occurs whenever it is energetically favorable • No mesh, no elements! • Can model heterogeneous materials exhibiting high complexity • Can model complex-fracture systems without the need to keep track of each crack • Can be easily implemented in LAMMPS or custom-made codes and be parrallelized to minimize computational cost

  19. Future Work • Simulate asperity contact to study the effect of local surface interference at the head ‐ disk interface (HDI) on the resulting deformation and atomic ‐ scale wear using Peridynamics , a continuum version of Molecular Dynamics (MD). • Simulate the wear process of thin ‐ film media at the HDI. • Develop a criterion of atomic ‐ scale material removal including statistical parameters, such as average asperity size, interference distance, and media nanomechanical properties.

  20. Thank You!

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend