Performance Review April 2018 Safety Overview As of April 30, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

performance review
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Performance Review April 2018 Safety Overview As of April 30, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Performance Review April 2018 Safety Overview As of April 30, 2018, WRPS Tank Operations Contract had worked 6,313,668 hours (447 days) There were no Recordable without a Lost Time Workday Injury, and cases in April 2018. 2,419,237 hours


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Performance Review April 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Safety Overview

There were seven First Aid cases in April:

  • Employee tripped while

ascending stairs and hit head

  • n wall causing pain to head.
  • While walking to stairs

employee slipped on mat causing pain in ankle.

  • While collecting papers

employee received a paper cut.

  • While opening door employee

strained back and shoulder.

  • Employee pulled starter cord
  • n pressure washer causing

back strain.

  • Employee picked up

instrument bag causing strain to back.

  • While opening steam valve

with helper tool, bar swung around hitting employee in the forehead causing contusion.

  • Employee felt pain in back

while reaching for mask in back seat of truck.

As of April 30, 2018, WRPS Tank Operations Contract had worked 6,313,668 hours (447 days) without a Lost Time Workday Injury, and 2,419,237 hours (165 days) since the last Recordable case.

Total Recordable FY 2018 Cumulative Summary

October 1, 2017 through September 30, 2018

Days Away, Restricted Workdays or Transferred (DART) FY 2018 Cumulative Summary

October 1, 2017 through September 30, 2018

0.07

12-month rolling rate – 0.08

DOE/EM Goal – 1.10

0.00

12-month rolling rate – 0.00

DOE/EM Goal – 0.60

There were no Recordable cases in April 2018. April 2018

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Highlights of the Month

3 April 2018

Core drilling cover block for heater installation; six inch long cover block core AN-Farm Egress/Bottle Handling Tent Cut and Cap abandoned utilities outside SX Farm

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Key Takeaways

4

  • Schedule Recovery Focus

– Transition to Air Purifying Resp. (APRs) in Ventilated Tank Farms – Vendor Support, Capabilities and Priorities through Sep-18

  • Progress on reducing change proposal backlog in

anticipation of contract extension efforts

  • FY19/20 Plan currently on track for May 31st

submittal

  • Renegotiation of PEMP currently ongoing
  • Evolution and Transition of Waste Feed Delivery

April 2018

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Current Month Change Control

5 April 2018

Apr-18 May-18 Jun-18 Jul-18 Aug-18 Sep-18 Total DB Impacts

  • $40

$2,380 $2,260 $2,518 $3,420 $2,847 $13,385

Apr 18 BCR Baseline Impacts *

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Corrective Action Log

6 April 2018

Cross-Cutting Risk New CA Closed CA Remaining CA WRPS-001 - Funding / Contract Direction Not Received When Required 1 2 WRPS-002 - Resources Not Available When Required 1 2 7 WRPS-003 - Tank Vapors Controls Impact Project Execution 1 2 WRPS-008 - Requirements Changes/ Interpretation of Requirements 8 WRPS-009 - Aging Tank Farm Facilities & Infrastructure 1 1 1 WRPS-010 - Complex Integration of Field Work 2 WRPS-011 - Unexpected Field Conditions Encountered 3 4 7 N/A - Not Assigned 1 14 15 Grand Total : 6 23 44 Current Month Corrective Action Log Impacts

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Performance Overview Current Month / Fiscal Year

7 April 2018

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Performance Overview Cumulative / At Complete

8 April 2018

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Schedule and Cost Performance Forecast

9

Forecast Apr BCWP vs. Actual Apr BCWP Missed by -$5,763k

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

AX-102/AX-104 Equipment Removal -$790k TOC Direct Facilities Support -$630k AX-101/AX-103 Equipment Removal -$574k DNFSB Recommendation 2012-2 -$532k

Current Month SV of -$4,161k

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

Vapor Monitoring & Detection Upgrades -$1,271k Interim SX Barrier South Construction -$1,254k A-Farm Infrastructure Ventilation -$794k AX-101/AX-103 Equipment Removal -$789k AX-101/AX-103 Retrieval Procurement -$761k CV declines by -$8,325k by FY End (from CM CTD)

____________________________________________________________________________________________________,______________________________________

A/AX Infrastructure Installation -$3,328k Vapor Monitoring & Detection Upgrades -$2,542k Interim SX Barrier South Construction -$1,303k Waste Feed Delivery Technology -$1,035k

SV improves $28,374k by FY End (from CM CTD)

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Vapor Monitoring & Detection Upgrades $2,798k ETF/LERF/TEDF Operations & Maintenance $1,878k TF PA Systems for Event Notification $1,710k Industrial Hygiene Trailer $1,619k DST Transfer Pump Replacements $1,572k AX-102/AX-104 Equip Removal $1,550k

April 2018

OFR1M

(Optimistic Forecast Rate, 1 month)

30%

Discrete work only

slide-10
SLIDE 10

April 2018

Performance Based Incentive Schedule

10

**PBI-39.0.3 terminal date extended to 09/30/18 per ORP letter 18-WSC-0011, dated 02/15/18. The BCR to change terminal date to be implemented after receiving next PEMP contract modification.

Top 10 PBI Milestones by Value

Of the 10 PBIs listed:

  • Two have negative calendar float
  • Six have negative CSLM
  • Ten have Terminal Dates of 9/30/18.

PBI Milestone by Calendar Float

  • Nine PBI Milestones have negative float, an

increase of two since Mar ME.

  • #3 and #7-9 are new to the list for April ME.

 20 of all remaining PBI Milestones (not all listed) have <10 days of float.

4 Completed this Calendar Month

  • PBI-37.0.2.7 - Complete Grab Sample #7 in support of

Tank Operations Contract (TOC) mission

  • PBI-37.0.3.1 - Reduce LERF inventory by 1,000,000 gallons
  • PBI-37.0.5.1 - Perform Ultrasonic Testing Examination of
  • ne Double Shell Tank (DST)
  • PBI-38.0.1.1 - Complete one (1) 242-A Facility Upgrade

**

slide-11
SLIDE 11

ID Title Description Org. Ownership Handling Actions Risk Level Real Time Status Status

WRPS-003 Tank Vapor's Controls Impact Project Execution Throughout the history of tank farm

  • perations the concern over tank

vapor releases and the hazards to the work force have been of

  • concern. In early 2014 workers

began reporting smelling and having symptoms associated with tank

  • vapors. The WRPS baseline did not

include additional controls or worker PPE in the project estimates and

  • schedules. The impact of wearing

SCBA during waste disturbing activities has now been factored into baseline, but a risk exists that tank vapors continue to result in unexpected work stoppages and worker safety as well as project performance are negatively impacted. ORP (majority) /WRPS Cantwell

  • 1. Manage mask/cartridge/bottle needs across TOC.

(ongoing)

  • 2. Establish interfaces with vendors for support and backup
  • capabilities. (complete)
  • 3. Procure additional PPE based on forecasted needs.

(ongoing)

  • 4. Engage w/workforce to identify PPE issues and

communicate resolution. (ongoing)

  • 5. Developing/Implement Comprehensive Vapors Action
  • Plan. (ongoing)

High 2/13/18 - AP farm moved back to using SCBA. Many bottles are nearing the expiration date. Some of the bottles have cracks/wearing out and there is a concern of availability of bottles with the increase in field work for FY18. No change WRPS-005 Tank Integrity in East is Compromised Adequate DST space is needed to support tank retrieval, evaporator campaigns and ensures tanks space is available for emergencies (space). A risk exists that insufficient space will be available due to compromised containment barriers. ORP/ WRPS N.Davis

  • 1. Perform DST Integrity Program and risk evaluation ( RPP-

ASMT-61284) and implement recommendations;

  • Continue UT inspections of primary tank walls and annulus

floors (nominal 3 per year) (ongoing)

  • Consider additional annulus floor UT inspections as

resources allow (ongoing)

  • Continue tank sampling and chemistry program to ensure

waste chemistry prohibits corrosion (ongoing)

  • Continue development of technology to inspect

underneath the tank primary liner (ongoing)

  • Continue development of technology to inspect primary

liner floor (not accessible for UT) (ongoing)

  • Continue development of a system to pump annulus waste

to the primary tank (ongoing) Medium 02/13/18 - All Risk handling strategies are in progress UT scans of the AY-101 primary tank wall indicate a new site of wall thinning with up to 26% loss; evaluation and extent of condition is in progress. WRPS is waiting on evaluation/extent of conditions report to determine the current risk

  • level. The evaluation will determine additional

handling actions. WRPS may need to prepare a plan in advance to empty AY-101. No change WRPS-009 Aging TOC Facilities & Infrastructure Many facilities maintained and

  • perated by WRPS along with the

supporting infrastructure provided by other Hanford contractors is over 50 years old. A risk exists that aging infrastructure fails more often than anticipated and requires more upkeep and maintenance than expected. ORP/ WRPS Geary, K.Smith, Greenwell

  • 1. Identify and prioritize infrastructure upgrades. (ongoing)
  • 2. Execute top ISP projects
  • 3. Do a risk analysis of facilities and infrastructure (example

PUREX Tunnel)

  • 4. System health program at ETF (Started)

High 4/18/17 - Examples of realized risk:

  • Multiple failed fire systems and panels
  • LERF cover basin integrity.
  • Transfer Pump.

2/13/18 - ETF will implement a System Health program in April similar to 222-S Lab. No change

WRPS Cross ss-Cutting Program Ri Risk

11 April 2018

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Indirect Pools – April 2018

April 2018

(Over)/Under Summary: $4.0M Under April / $7.0M Under March

Current Impacts:

  • Reduced G&A FY18 EACs
  • Base increased to reflect deferred scope pulled back into to FY18
  • Medical Insurance COS / COP Rate Adjustment ($5.0m)
  • Lower LAWPS Base / Lower G&A Pool

FY18 (Over)/Under Forecast Fringe Rate (ABS & COS) ($4.2M) Over ABS (applied to Labor) ($0.2M) Under COS (applied to Labor) ($4M) Over COP Rate (applied to Labor) $0.8M Under G&A Rate (applied to Labor/Non-Labor) $7.3M Under

Total Net Debit to PMB $4.0M Under

(Over) = Credit to the Direct Field Work / Under = Cost Charge/Allocation to the Direct Field Work

16

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Critical Needs List

13 April 2018

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • $7,225
  • $40,832

$3,296

  • $2,081

0.96 0.88 0.95 0.99 0.86 0.79

April 2018

SST Retrie ievals ls Performance Review

Schedule Cost

14 Dollars Represented in Thousands

FY TCPI FYTD CPI CTD SPI CTD CPI FYTD SPI CM SPI

CTD Schedule Variance Total: -$5,377 C-Farm Retrievals

  • $910

A/AX Retrievals

  • $3,901

AY-102 Retrieval

  • $429

Cost Variance FYTD: -$2,893 CTD: -$33,607 C-Farm Retrievals $3,521

  • $7,634

A/AX Retrievals

  • $7,205
  • $32,701

AY-102 Retrieval $775 $6,712

EOY Forecast SV

Delta From Today

EOY Forecast CV

Delta From Today

Key Points

  • Received A/AX Control Trailers POR-471 & POR-498
  • Received POR-496 Caustic Splitter Manifold
  • Received A-Farm Exhausters POR-518 & POR-519
  • Commenced Rerouting A-Farm Road around Exhausters
  • Completed HIHTL Plate Removal for POR-138 to AN-101
  • Completed AN Change Tent Installation
  • EOY Forecast CV
  • A/AX Infrastructure Installation -$3.3m
  • Op Training & Quals / Common Upgrades -$1.8m
  • A-Farm Infrastructure - Ventilation -$0.8m
  • AX-102/AX-104 Equipment Removal -$0.8m
  • AX-101/AX-103 Equipment Removal -$0.6m

Biggest Threats/Risk Key to Success

Schedule impacts due to several factors have resulted in retrieval legal milestones being in jeopardy: CD D-16B-2 (Complete 9 tanks by 31 March 2024) and TPA M-045-15 (Complete A-103 by 30 Sept. 2022)  DOE notified the State of Washington that CD D-16B-2 is in jeopardy due to vapor impacts  Funding priority placed on A/AX construction  Retaining core operations team proficiency for AX retrieval readiness  Implementation of APR use in AX farm will significantly improve efficiency/schedule performance Washington Department of Ecology’s recent interpretation on tank ventilation air permitting requirements cannot be met with the current generation of tank exhauster systems  Request to revise the AX Farm air permit needed to support retrieval was submitted to ECY February 23, 2016  ECY’s position is closely associated with the tank vapor litigation  Work closely with WRPS and DOE legal to negotiate solution Costs of A/AX retrieval system construction have increased due to several factors  Implementation of APR use in AX farm will significantly improve efficiency/cost performance  Redesign of waste retrieval systems to simplify construction and reduce costs  Complete a cost growth drivers analysis There is a shortage of key field labor (NCOs, HPTs, IHTs, construction crafts) due to attrition, site-wide bump-and-roll, regional competition for skilled labor  Coordination with CHPRC to pick up labor from any future RIF  Early forecasting of construction labor needs to support contractor recruiting efforts  Expedited worker training for field deployment Deployment of new retrieval technologies to improve efficiency and strengthen DOE support for retrieval  Coordination with CTO  Tech transfer from SRR (crawlers, sampling systems, mixer pumps)  Tech transfer from heavy construction/mining industry (dome coring, mechanical waste gathering)

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • $263

$9,820

$3,057

  • $216

1.00 1.01 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.01

April 2018

Production Operations Performance Review

Schedule Cost

15 Dollars Represented in Thousands

FY TCPI FYTD CPI CTD SPI CTD CPI FYTD SPI CM SPI

CTD Schedule Variance Total: -$3,273 Effluent Treatment Facility

  • $1,929

222-S Laboratory Facility Option Period 2

  • $1,502

Base Operations Support/Special Projects $569 Cost Variance FYTD: -$5,047 CTD: $10,083 Base Operations Support/Special Projects

  • $1,525
  • $20,768

Base Operations East Area Farms

  • $641

$8,848 Solid Waste Management

  • $655

$6,734

EOY Forecast SV

Delta From Today

EOY Forecast CV

Delta From Today

Key Points

Biggest Threats / Risks Keys to Success

Aging Equipment: ETF Systems, 242-A Systems, Transfer Pumps Adequate Spares, PMs, and Planned Upgrades PM/CM Backlog Reduction Adequate resource availability Adequate PMs, Spare Parts Inventory Critical Resource Review FY19/20 Planning Integration & prioritization for allocation of key resources Assess Skill Mix to FY19/FY20 Scope HAMTC MOA - Downgrade Respiratory Equip Requirement Field implementation of cartridges following 3rd Party Review PFP D&D boundary controls impact TOC execution Close coordination with CHPRC/DOE on response actions at PFP to minimize impacts 222-S and ETF Readiness to support DFLAW FY19/FY20 Proposal

  • Maintenance costs continue to increase due to failed equipment and the need for overtime to provide troubleshooting and repairs. This is anticipated

to stabilize once the LERF and 242-A Evaporator Campaigns are initiated.

  • April Significant Accomplishments:

 Presented the “222-S Laboratory Readiness to Support DFLAW” to the DOE-ORP Manager and executive management team.  Completed the 1st LERF Campaign of FY 2018 reducing the LERF Inventory by 1,000,000 Gallons. PBI-37.0.3.1  Completed the DST to DST Waste Transfer from Tank AP-103 to Tank AP-108 in support of the 242-A Evaporator Campaign (EC-08) ;and initiated Operations of the Campaign.  Received the Fourier Transform Infrared/Thermo Gravity Analyzer (FTIR/TGA) analytical equipment on Site.  Completed the DST Recirculation of Tank AY-101 in supporting tank waste characterization and integrity.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

$2,731

  • $7,358

$8,754

  • $1,411

1.05 0.98 0.88 0.98 1.09 0.88

April 2018

TFP FP Performance Revie iew

Schedule Cost

16 Dollars Represented in Thousands

FY TCPI FYTD CPI CTD SPI CTD CPI FYTD SPI CM SPI

CTD Schedule Variance Total: -$10,165 Tank Chemistry and Integrity

  • $3,138

Tank Farm Projects

  • $5,463

Vadose Zone/Interim Measures (SX Barrier)

  • $1,458

Cost Variance FYTD: -$5,623 CTD: -$10,089 Tank Farm Projects

  • $2,064
  • $7,100

Vadose Zone/Interim Measures

  • $4,047
  • $3,915

DST Feed Delivery Upgrades $588 $228

EOY Forecast SV

Delta From Today

EOY Forecast CV

Delta From Today

Key Points

ISSUES

  • Execution of SX Barrier placement on SCBA
  • Engineering resource availability
  • Coordination of 242-A Evaporator facility upgrades with transfer and campaign

schedule.

  • AW Farm multiple project teams on SCBA
  • PFP Work Zone contamination

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

  • Performed grab sampling AZ-102 (Pre-Recirc)
  • Completed AY-101 UT
  • Continued Simulant Valve Testing (Flowserve & PBM Valves)
  • Installed AZ-102 pump removal equipment and removed pump
  • Completed 242-A Facility HVAC Upgrade
  • Completed 242-A Process Condensate Upgrade
  • Completed Safety Shower Upgrades SY and AY Farms

Biggest Threats / Risks Keys to Success

Impact of change in mission to include Tank Side Cesium Removal and location change for LAWPS Integration and prioritization for allocation of key resources Early and clear identification of revisions to DFLAW upgrades scope to support TSCR Integration with 242-A Evaporator campaigns Schedule Projects during available periods around evaporator campaign schedule Opportunity; Downgrade respiratory equipment requirements Field implementation of cartridges following 3rd Party review Construction forces resource availability Working with subcontractors to provide labor needs in advance and providing block training at Hammer

slide-17
SLIDE 17

CVAP Performance Revie iew

(WBS BS 5.1.5.2.11 & 5.1.5.11)

Schedule Cost

17 Dollars Represented in Thousands

FY TCPI FYTD CPI CTD SPI CTD CPI FYTD SPI CM SPI

CTD Schedule Variance Total: -$7,914 Vapor Monitoring & Detection System Upgrades

  • $3,504

Tank Farms PA Systems for Event Notification

  • $1,710

Industrial Hygiene Trailer

  • $1,619

Cost Variance FYTD: -$1,730 CTD: -$1,341 New Vapor Detection Technologies

  • $704
  • $1,861

Vapor Monitoring & Detection System Upgrades

  • $553
  • $1,500

NUCON Vapor Abatement

  • $592
  • $577

EOY Forecast SV

Delta From Today

EOY Forecast CV

Delta From Today

Key Points

  • Completed reviews of Strobic mockup test plan
  • Ongoing NUCON testing
  • Awarded Stack Monitor Install construction contract – AN,

702-AZ, and AW

  • Submitted Final UV-DOAS Cerex Stack Monitor Design AN &

AZ farms

  • Completed Draft AN farm QRA
  • Initiated TX farm automation design

Biggest Threats / Risks Keys to Success

Outcomes from third-party review

  • f Chemical Cartridge Evaluation

Reports Field implementation of cartridges following third-party reviews Critical Resource Availability (Plant & Construction Forces) Integration & prioritization for allocation of key resources Results of QRA may change boundaries Vapor Monitoring & Detection System equipment turnover to

  • perations

Consistent vendor support for vapor abatement unit procurements Timely delivery of Stack Monitors procurement AW Stack Permitting Ecology Approval for Authorization

April 2018

  • $1,924
  • $3,265

$7,208

  • $706

0.90 0.91 0.98 0.92 0.81 0.55

slide-18
SLIDE 18

CVAP Da Dashboard

18 April 2018

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • $291
  • $7,384

$395

  • $22

0.95 0.93 0.99 1.00 1.24 0.93

April 2018

LA LAWPS Performance Revie iew

(WBS 5. 5.5)

Schedule Cost

19 Dollars Represented in Thousands

FY TCPI FYTD CPI CTD SPI CTD CPI FYTD SPI CM SPI

CTD Schedule Variance Total: -$417 P - LAWPS-S - Design Project Support

  • $226

P - LAWPS-S - Technology Maturation

  • $200

P - LAWPS-S South - Design $61 Cost Variance FYTD: -$146 CTD: -$7,093 P - LAWPS - Design

  • $984
  • $6,720

P - LAWPS - Design Project Support $330

  • $2,370

P - LAWPS - Technology Maturation $673 $1,122

EOY Forecast SV

Delta From Today

EOY Forecast CV

Delta From Today

Key Points

Biggest Threats/Risks Keys to Success

WDOE Desire to include HVAC System in RCRA Permit. Continue to support ORP in discussions/negotiations. Spent IX Column interim storage package requirements. Continue evaluation of requirements and alternatives. Permitting strategy for interim storage pad. Continue evaluation of requirements and alternatives.

  • Progressed towards conducting 45% Over-the-Shoulder design review (first

session mid-May)

  • Incorporated ORP comments on Safety Design Strategy (SDS)
  • Continued review and approval of 1/9 scale and bench scale test reports
  • April BCR implemented majority of FY18 Optimized LAWPS scope from CP-18-007
slide-20
SLIDE 20

$4,968

April 2018

$12,833

  • $2,947

CT CTO/Closure an and In Interim Meas asures Performance Revie iew

Schedule Cost

20 Dollars Represented in Thousands

FY TCPI FYTD CPI CTD SPI CTD CPI FYTD SPI CM SPI

CTD Schedule Variance Total: -$7,915 Vadose Zone / Interim Measures

  • $2,306

Regulatory Documentation

  • $1,830

WFD Engineering

  • $1,213

Cost Variance FYTD: $1,165 CTD: $14,557 Technology Development $1,144 $5,850 WFD Engineering

  • $12

$2,945 Dispose ILAW

  • $123

$1,872

EOY Forecast SV

Delta From Today

EOY Forecast CV

Delta From Today -$1,724

Key Points Schedule Recovery

  • Draft Technology & Innovation Roadmap issues for review by WRPS, ORP, and National Laboratories.
  • Completed test plan development for the Phase II Mechanical Waste Gathering System testing and

developed simulants for testing.

  • Complete real waste melter runs for AP-105 waste; completed real waste ion exchange testing with CST
  • n AP-107 waste with Radioactive Waste Test Platform.
  • Design of the first of three panels for the TX Farm interim surface barrier is proceeding.
  • Visual inspections of C-301 Catch Tank completed.
  • Work is proceeding on Grout Testing and other WMA C closure activities.
  • Supporting ORP and HQ in development of the Enhanced Stabilization Approach for WMA C.
  • DOE O 435.1 WMA C WIR and PA Public meeting and start of public/NRC review are scheduled for June.
  • Regulatory Documentation schedule variance is due to Ecology comments that are

past due. Have started receiving and dispositioning the comments. Due to the significant number of comments, recovery is not expected this FY.

  • ILAW Glass Testing is expected to recover a portion of lost schedule in the current

fiscal year, the remaining scope (Seeded PCTs and Lysimeter studies) is expected to carryover to Q3 and Q4 of FY 2018.

0.79 1.03 1.08 0.92 1.07 0.96

Biggest Threats / Risks Keys to Success

Path forward for Ecology review and finalization of WMA C closure documents is needed. A mutually acceptable regulatory approach must be developed among Ecology, DOE, and WRPS to move forward with incremental closure of WMA C. Working with DOE and Ecology to develop acceptable path forward. Executing late contracts with PNNL and or SRNL. An AFP transfer was completed to SRNL for reachback and project support on select scope and RFPs were sent to other laboratories for remaining testing

  • activities. Diligent follow-up to execute
  • work. Recovery plan developed for work

scope impacted by SRNL contract award delays. Interim Barrier milestone revision is not approved. ORP and Ecology are working on a TPA Change Package to revise the TPA Milestone due dates.