Perceiving Urban Soundscapes: Marc Ciufo Green Human and Machine - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

perceiving urban soundscapes
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Perceiving Urban Soundscapes: Marc Ciufo Green Human and Machine - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Audio Lab - Department of Electronic Engineering Perceiving Urban Soundscapes: Marc Ciufo Green Human and Machine Perspectives Key Points What is a soundscape? Human impact on the soundscapes of our lives How to measure and quantify


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Audio Lab - Department of Electronic Engineering

Perceiving Urban Soundscapes:

Human and Machine Perspectives

Marc Ciufo Green

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Key Points

❖ What is a soundscape? ❖ Human impact on the soundscapes of our lives ❖ How to measure and quantify environmental sound ❖ Human reactions to soundscapes ❖ My project - spatial soundscape analysis

slide-3
SLIDE 3

“The acoustic environment of a place, as perceived by people, whose character is the result of the action and interaction of natural and/or human factors.”

Soundscape

slide-4
SLIDE 4

“The age of humans”

Anthropocene

[2]

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Industrialisation of the Soundscape

❖ Immediate health effects: ❖ Hearing damage ❖ Lack of sleep ❖ Physical and emotional

wellbeing

❖ More difficult to quantify ❖ Limited historical surveys

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7d/Building_site_-_panoramio.jpg

slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7

[3]

1912 - 88 dB(A) 2017 - 115 dB(A)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Measuring Environmental Noise

LAeq

Sound Pressure Level A-weighted Equivalent

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Measuring Environmental Noise

❖ Simple to measure and understand. ❖ Aggregates all sound into one figure. ❖ Content of the soundscape is discarded. ❖ Soundscape content is key to human

perception and reaction.

LAeq

slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Approaches to Environmental Sound

Environmental Noise Approach Soundscape Approach Sound managed as a waste Sound perceived as a resource Focus is on sounds of discomfort Focus is on sounds of preference Measured using LAeq Requires differentiation between sound sources and human judgement Managed by reducing levels Works towards wanted sounds not being masked by unwanted sounds

[5]

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Soundscape Taxonomies

❖ Schafer’s Features of the Soundscape ❖ Soundecology Categories ❖ Brown’s Acoustic Environment Schema

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Features of the Soundscape

Keynotes Signals Soundmarks Archetypal Sounds

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Features of the Soundscape

Keynotes Signals Soundmarks Archetypal Sounds

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Soundecology Categories

Anthrophony Biophony Geophony

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Normalised Difference Soundscape Index

❖ NDSI - metric to measure biophony/anthrophony ratio ❖ Recently applied to urban sound by Devos

  • 1

Anthrophony

+1

Biophony

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Normalised Difference Soundscape Index

  • 1

Anthrophony

+1

Biophony

‘Computational model of auditory attention’ could improve results

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Acoustic Environment Schema

❖ Anthro/Bio/Geophony given equal weight in

soundecology work

❖ Urban soundscapes dominated by Anthrophony ❖ ‘Insufficient resolution’ in urban sound

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Acoustic Environment Schema

Sounds generated by human activity/facility Sounds not generated by human activity Voice & instrument Social/communal voice Non-amplified Amplified4 Motorised transport air traffic rail traffic roadway traffic marine traffic Electro- mechanical:

  • stationary
  • mobile

footsteps electrical installation non-motorized Human movement construction ventilation agriculture domestic recreation Other human6 wildlife earth/ice movement thunder water wind music speech singing laughter Nature3 Domesticated animals3 industry bells clock chimes fireworks azan alarms

Anthrophonic

Geophonic

}

Biophonic

[7]

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Indoor Acoustic Environment The Acoustic Environment Outdoor Acoustic Environment

ditto Wilderness2 Acoustic Environment Urban1 Acoustic Environment Rural1 Acoustic Environment Underwater Acoustic Environment ditto ditto5 ditto Sounds generated by human activity/facility Sounds not generated by human activity Voice & instrument Social/communal voice Non-amplified Amplified4 Motorised transport air traffic rail traffic roadway traffic marine traffic Electro- mechanical:

  • stationary
  • mobile

footsteps electrical installation non-motorized Human movement construction ventilation agriculture domestic recreation Other human6 wildlife earth/ice movement thunder water wind music speech singing laughter Nature3 Domesticated animals3 industry bells clock chimes fireworks azan alarms

Anthrophonic

Geophonic

}

Biophonic

Acoustic Environment Schema

❖ Decouple sounds from human

‘value judgements’

❖ Objectivity in analysis - the

machine perspective

slide-22
SLIDE 22

EigenScape Database

❖ Spatial soundscape recordings ❖ mh Acoustics EigenMike ❖ Samsung Gear 360 Camera ❖ 8 x 8 location categories ❖ 64 ten-minute recordings

slide-23
SLIDE 23

References

[1] International Panel on Climate Change, “Climate Change 2013 - Summary for Policymakers” 2013. [Online]. Available: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ ar5/wg1/WG1AR5_SPM_FINAL.pdf [Accessed: 6th June 2017] [2] C. N. Waters et al., “The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene,” Science, vol. 351, no. 6269, p. aad2622, Jan 2016. [3] R.M. Schafer, The Soundscape: Our Sonic Environment and the Tuning of the World. Rochester, Vermont: Inner Traditions / Bear & Co, 1993. [4] S. Harriet and D. Murphy, “Auralisation of an urban soundscape,” Acta Acustica united with Acustica, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 798-810, Jul 2015. [5] A. L. Brown, “Soundscapes and environmental noise management,” Noise Control Engineering Journal, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 493 - 500, 2010. [6] J. Kang and B. Schulte-Fortkamp, Soundscapes and the Built Environment. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2016. [7] A. Brown, J. Kang and T. Gjestland, “Towards standardisation in soundscape preference assessment,” Applied Acoustics, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 387-392, May 2011. [8] Ö. Axelsson, M. E. Nilsson and B. Berglung, “A principle components model of soundscape perception,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 128, no. 5, pp. 2836-2846, Nov 2010.