PCR assay of the molecular mutation at cinnabar and vestigial genes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
PCR assay of the molecular mutation at cinnabar and vestigial genes of Drosophila melanogaster germ cells after -rays action Aleksievich Olga, BSU Igor D. Alexandrov, Ph. D., Furs Olga, BSU Dr. Sci. (Biology), chief.
PCR assay of the molecular mutation at cinnabar and vestigial genes of Drosophila melanogaster germ cells after γ -rays action • Aleksievich Olga, BSU • Igor D. Alexandrov, Ph. D., • Furs Olga, BSU Dr. Sci. (Biology), chief. • Sivak Tatiana, BSU Sci.res. • Margarita V. Alexandrova, Sharash Irina, BSU • Ph. D., senior sci. res.
Project aim Project aim TO STUDY THE MOLECULAR GENETIC ACTION OF GAMMA-RAYS ON THE CINNABAR AND VESTIGIAL GENES IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER GERM CELLS
Drosophila melanogaster , species is commonly known as the common fruit fly or vinegar fly. One of the best model organism in genetics and radiobiology because: § Well studied example, gene structure known § Has common principal DNA structure with humans § Short life cycle (~10 days) § Permits the study of heritable gene mutation § Low cost
Wild phenotype of Drosophila melanogaster γ -rays γ -rays Phenotype of vestigial gene Phenotype of cinnabar gene mutants mutants
Main steps Main steps
DNA isolation DNA isolation - cell lysis - DNA sorbtion with Silica Solution - DNA purification using washing buffer - DNA extraction using Extra Gene
P olymerase C hain R eaction - PCR - to amplify specific fragment of DNA - method based on in vitro replication of DNA using: Taq polymerase primers dNTP reaction buffer
Electrophoresis ! !
Visualization - using ethidium bromide - dye intercalates beetween bases red- -orange orange red UV UV UV UV EM Max AB Max
Schem e of ves t i gi al gene
Ex 5 Ex 3 Ex 6-8 Ex 4 Ex 1 Ex 2
in 1 in 2-2 in 3 in 2-3 in 2-4
V es t i gi al m ut ant s w i t h g é not ype Phr № ex6-8 Mutation code Dose ex1 (983b) ex2 (777b) ex3 (471b) ex4 (381b) ex5 (670b) (768b) 1 + + + + + + Phr14 2 + + + + + + Phr16 γ , 40 3 + + + + + + vg89e19 4 γ , 40 + + + + + + vg89e20 5 γ , 40 + + + + + + vg89e23 6 γ , 40 + + + + + + vg89e47 7 γ , 40 + + + + + + vg89e64a 8 γ , 40 + + + + + + vg89e88 9 γ , 40 + + + + + + vg89e104b
In2-2 In2-3 In2-4 in1 (983b) in3 (768b) (471b) (381b) (670b) Mutation code Dose № 1 8 10 15 16 1 Phr14 + + + + + 2 + + + + + Phr16 3 γ , 40 + + + + + vg89e19 4 γ , 40 + + + + + vg89e20 5 γ , 40 + + + + + vg89e23 6 γ , 40 + + + + insertion vg89e47 γ , 40 7 + + + + + vg89e64a 8 γ , 40 + + + + + vg89e88 9 γ , 40 + + + + + vg89e104b
Res ul t s § 2 control lines and 7 mutants ( γ -irradiated) were examined § 8 exones and 3 intrones of vestigial gene were analyzed § 1 insertion was detected in 3 d introne of 1 vestigial gene mutant § More than 60 polymerase chain reactions were carried out
Concl us i ons § Such a little quantity of PCR-detected deletions could be caused by specific action of γ -rays. Because the type of radiation mentioned above induce point damage (as a rule) that cannot be detected by PCR § Mutant phenotype can be caused by changes in exones and intrones of the gene
St r uct ur e of t he ci nnabar gene
Vi s ual i z at i on of El e ct r ophore s i s Us i ng UV Li ght Fragment 1 Fragment 2 Fragment 3
PCR r es ul t s of t he 1 s t , 2 nd and 3 t h f r agm ent s of t he ci nnabar gene Fragments № № of fond № of mutations Dose Genotype 1st 2hd 3th 40 Gy γ Cn[74 b 2]vg/ Cy 2004 1 Cn3 D-18 + + + 40 Gy γ 2 Cn4 Cn[74 b 3]/Cy0 D-18 + + + 40 Gy γ Cn[74 b 4] /Cy 204 3 Cn5 D-32 + + + 40 Gy γ Cn[78 k 1]/Cy 204 4 Cn36 D-32 + + + 40 Gy γ Cn[81 l 4] /Cy 2004 5 Cn78 D-32 + + + 40 Gy γ Cn[83 b 27] /Cy 204 6 Cn-n83+In D-32 + + + 20Gy γ Cn[87 l 80]vg/ Cy 2004 7 Cn114 D-32 + + + 10Gy γ Cn[87 f 149]/ Cy 204 8 Cn122 D-32 + + + 60Gy γ 9 Cn140 Cn[88 d 7]/CyO D-32 + + + 2,5 Gy, 12 C Cn[10d3-4]/Cy 204 10 Cn198 D-18 + - +
Concl us i ons Gamma-rays induce point damage (as a rule) that cannot be detected by PCR Only 1 PCR-detected deletion was observed. It can be caused by high-dense irradiation of the mutant
G ener al Concl us i ons § We have studied the molecular alterations induced by ionizing radiation at 2 Drosophila genes with different sizes, structure and position on the chromosomes. § Two different genes-targets react in the same way on the action of radiation. It is suggested that different position of 2 genes on the chromosome and difference in sizes don’t influence on their radiomutability. § Mutations can be caused by changes in intrones and exones
Thanks f or your at t ent i on!
Recommend
More recommend
Explore More Topics
Stay informed with curated content and fresh updates.