patellofemoral arthroplasty align the patella
play

Patellofemoral Arthroplasty .align the patella!!!! Phil Davidson, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Patellofemoral Arthroplasty .align the patella!!!! Phil Davidson, MD Davidson Orthopaedics Park City, Utah Ortho Summit, Las Vegas Dec 7, 2017 Disclosures none Outline Morphology Geometry Bio vs Prosthetic


  1. Patellofemoral Arthroplasty ….align the patella!!!! Phil Davidson, MD Davidson Orthopaedics Park City, Utah Ortho Summit, Las Vegas Dec 7, 2017

  2. Disclosures none

  3. Outline • Morphology • Geometry • Bio vs Prosthetic • Prosthetics/Implants • Realign Procedures • Combo Procedures – Realignment – Arthroplasty

  4. The majority of PF DJD in isolation or in “younger patients” are associated with: 1. Abnormal Morphology 2. Abnormal Geometry Rotation Height Version 28 year old female

  5. Morphology • Both patellar and trochlear morphology need to be identified in considering Wiberg Classification treatment options • Abnormal morphology can create stresses on repairs • May not make sense to do inlay resurfacing on abnormal morphologic topography Dejour Classification

  6. Geometry • Geometric alignment needs to be considered in 3-D – Patellar position M-L • Valgus knee – Patellar “tilt” • Femoral version – Patellar height • Correction targeted at specific malalignment/rotation • NEVER do Lateral Release alone

  7. Limb Rotation – femur and tibia • Both Femoral Version AND Tibial Torsion bear on PF forces • Femoral Anteversion – NL female 13 • External Tibial Torsion – NL female 27

  8. Radiography Merchant Xray- need dedicated > 145 board/ jig considered “shallow”

  9. Radiography- Patellar Height • Caton-Deschamps (CD) Ratio (X/Y) • NL appx 0.6-1.3 • Very handy to use digital measuring tools • Patellar Alta and Baja – Can be addressed with TTO – Alta possible MPFL

  10. Radiography- TT-TG or TT-PCL Relative Patellar Translation • TT-TG, useful if distinct FTG sulcus – NL <appx 18mm • TT-PCL, may be more accurate, needed for abnormal FTG morphology – NL appx <24

  11. Extensor Realignment • Medial Plication • Lateral Release • Need “normal” tissue to plicate – i.e. not markedly lax • Easily incorporated into PFA “Selective” lateral release, preserving underlying synovial layer– part of realignm ent, not alone!

  12. MPFL combo with PFA • This is indicated when DJD coexists with recurrent instability and/or laxity • Need to protect patellar implant • Avoid patellar bone tunnel techniques

  13. TTO with PFA • Medialization can correct for increased TT-TG or TT-PCL • Move proximal to address patellar baja • Distalize to address patellar alta

  14. Biologic or Prosthetic Resurfacing ???? Key decision making point • Multifactoral decision – Lesion: focal or diffuse – Patient Factors – Comorbidities – Osteophytes – Bipolar – Resources Available Inverted patella of 19 yr old male

  15. Radiographic Guide to Bio vs. Prosthetic Kellgren-Lawrence Grading Scale Generally Biological Resurfacing…… Grade 0 = Normal Grade 1 = Doubtful narrowing of the joint space and possible osteophytic lipping Grade 2 = Definite osteophytes, definite narrowing of the joint space KL 1 Generally Prosthetic Resurfacing….. Grade 3 = Moderate multiple osteophytes, definite narrowing of joints space, some sclerosis and possible deformity of bone contour Grade 4 = large osteophytes, marked narrowing of joint space, severe sclerosis and definite deformity of bone contour. KL 4

  16. Biological Options • Scaffolds • Cell Therapy • Osteochondral Grafts – Autogenous • Limited use – Allograft • Fresh stored • Cryopreserved • Cartilage Grafts – Minced, ground, lamellar – Cryopreserved – Non-viable (scaffold)

  17. Inlay vs Onlay Patella – Biologic

  18. What if biologics will not or cannot work? …Transitioning the algorithm from biologics to prosthetics Prosthetics - Joint Resurfacing

  19. Onlay vs Inlay Joint Resurfacing - Patella • Inlay useful for focal defects and for “normal” morphology • Onlay needed for diffuse chondral disease or “abnormal” morphology • I use Onlay MUCH more frequently

  20. Onlay vs Inlay Joint Resurfacing for FTG • Onlay device replaces anatomy, but may add unwanted volume Onlay • Inlay device based on ambient anatomy • Inlay device allows for concurrent realignment • Inlay device inherently stable • Inlay typically more anatomic I nlay

  21. PFA “legacy onlay implants” very negative history • Non-anatomical • Overstuffed the joint • Encroach on TF joint • Very mixed, negative results with high revision rates • Did not allow for concurrent alignment!!

  22. Patellar-Trochlea alignment Key step- Patella directly over FTG

  23. Summary • Must establish alignment • Want to accommodate potential revision to TKA • Cannot have plastic on cartilage (no poly patella alone) • Resurfacing must be done in context of anatomy/deformities • No Overstuffing

  24. Thank You phildavidsonmd@gmail.com

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend