Pandemic Impacts on Executive Compensation Ashleigh Newlin Lynn - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

pandemic impacts on executive compensation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Pandemic Impacts on Executive Compensation Ashleigh Newlin Lynn - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Pandemic Impacts on Executive Compensation Ashleigh Newlin Lynn DuBois Matt Keene Vice President Partner Managing Director Chartwell ESOP Law Group Chartwell Agenda Quarantine Impact / Introduction Revisiting 2008: Lessons Learned


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Pandemic Impacts on Executive Compensation

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Lynn DuBois Partner ESOP Law Group Matt Keene Managing Director Chartwell Ashleigh Newlin Vice President Chartwell

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Agenda

  • Quarantine Impact / Introduction
  • Revisiting 2008: Lessons Learned
  • Base
  • Bonus
  • Long Term Incentive Plans (“LTIP”)
  • Additional LTIP Considerations
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Quarantine Impact

  • Half of small businesses can’t afford to pay employees for a full month of

quarantine

  • 1 in 5 American workers say they will be unable to meet basic financial

needs (e.g., rent, groceries, bills) in one week or less

  • 58% say they will be unable to meet basic financial needs in one month or

less

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Change in Financial Assets Since End of Recession

  • As of December 2019, households in the bottom 20% of incomes had

seen their financial assets fall by 34% since the recession ended in 2009

Bottom 20% 40% to 60% 20% to 40% 60% to 80% 80% to 99% Top 1%

1Financial assets include cash, bank accounts, financial investments and retirement savings. Adjusted for inflation.

Source: Federal Reserve via the Wall Street Journal, April 15, 2020

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The Case for Long-Term Compensation Planning

2020 EMPLOYEE OWNERSHIP CONFERENCE

▪ WILL CASH COMPENSATION ALLOW LEADERS TO BUY DESIRED SHARES? ▪ DOES THE LTIP HELP SECURE THE NEXT GENERATION OF LEADERS? ▪ IS THE OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE OPTIMAL FOR THE COMPANY & LTIP? ▪ CAN THE COMPANY AFFORD REPURCHASE OBLIGATIONS OF ESOP & LTIP? ▪ DOES THE COMPENSATION PROGRAM SUPPORT & DRIVE THE STRATEGY?

Compensation Philosophy Ownership Philosophy 10-Year Strategic Plan

PERFORM DEEP FINANCIAL MODELING TO INTEGRATE STRATEGIC PLAN AND PHILOSOPHIES REFINE AS NECESSARY

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Revisiting 2008: Lessons Learned

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Balanced Compensation

  • Long-term incentive plan (“LTIP”): Any compensation earned or paid over

a period of longer than one year

  • Examples: deferred cash compensation, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”),

phantom stock, stock options, etc.

Base LTIP Bonus

slide-9
SLIDE 9

2008: Base Pay Impacts

  • Some companies had cuts to base pay
  • Clearly communicate your plan for reductions, and for restorations

Base LTIP Bonus

slide-10
SLIDE 10

2008: Bonus Impacts

  • Most bonuses were reduced or eliminated
  • Some bonuses had been viewed as entitlement

Base LTIP Bonus

slide-11
SLIDE 11

2008: Bonus Impacts

  • Note the shift towards measures centered on sustainability and liquidity

Bonus Metrics 2005 Survey 2010 Survey Cash Flow 19% 26% Cost/expense reduction

  • 17%

Working Capital

  • 4%

EBITDA 19% 25% Net income 24% 24% Source: Towers Watson 2010 Annual Incentive Plan Survey

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Bonus Implications

  • Discretion will be required at end of year
  • To the extent possible, develop a framework now for applying that

discretion (e.g., track virus impacts and financial results of associated responses)

  • Balance shareholder outcomes with rewarding outcomes within employees’

control at a time when commitment is highest

  • Where possible, recalibrate goals and reinvigorate employees
  • Perhaps consider additional quarterly awards tied to virus response or

critical business preservation goals

slide-13
SLIDE 13

2008: LTIP Impacts

  • Appreciation based LTIPs (e.g., SARs) were upside down
  • Evaluate the status of the overall package

Base LTIP Bonus LTIP

slide-14
SLIDE 14

LTIP Implications

  • Multiple pay components promote balance

Company A Company B

slide-15
SLIDE 15

LTIP Grant Implications

  • If you use multi-year goals:
  • Consider delaying the prospective grant
  • If already granted, adjust goals once clarity returns
  • If you use annual goals:
  • Consider a staggered grant (e.g., a smaller portion now for certainty, and

additional grant when clarity returns)

  • If already granted, adjust goals once clarity returns
slide-16
SLIDE 16

LTIP Payout Implications

Example: Assume company stock price at 03/31/2020 is less than at 12/31/2019. What value is used for LTIP payouts?

  • LTIP value is contractual: What does plan document say?
  • If document says to use the ESOP value as of preceding 12/31, an

interim value does not help

  • If document says to use the most recent ESOP value, an interim value

could help

slide-17
SLIDE 17

LTIP Payout Implications (cont.)

Example: Assume company stock price has likely decreased since the 12/31/2019 valuation. Can LTIP distributions be delayed?

  • Many LTIP arrangements are subject to Code Section 409A
  • Section 409A generally does not allow for changes in distribution timing
  • Distributions can be delayed if making distribution jeopardizes going concern

potential (note this is a higher standard than loan covenant breach)

  • Separately, participants can request an accelerated distribution due to an

unforeseeable emergency but this is a high bar (e.g., liquidating other resources)

  • Consult with your attorney on all changes to LTIP valuation and timing
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Section 409(p) Concern

The lower the stock price, the higher the number of shares of synthetic equity that will be attributed to a deferred compensation cash award EXAMPLE:

  • ESOP participant has cash pay LTIP award worth $50,000 at the

12/31/19 valuation of $10 per share

  • Equals 5,000 shares of company stock ($50,000 divided by $10 = 5,000 shares)
  • Interim valuation performed as of July 31, 2020 shows per share value is

$8 per share

  • Equals 6,250 shares of company stock ($50,000 divided by $8 = 6,250 shares)
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Section 409(p) Concern

Must prevent, not correct, any violation of Section 409(p) – if correcting, penalties will apply One option:

  • Cut back SYNTHETIC EQUITY (i.e., by cancelling or distributing some or

all of it – there is some relief under Code Section 409A regulations on this topic) before any interim valuation determination

  • Amount paid may not exceed 125% of the minimum amount of payment necessary to

avoid the occurrence of a nonallocation year

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Thank You

Ashleigh Newlin, Lynn DuBois and Matt Keene ashleigh.newlin@chartwellfa.com ldubois@esoplawgroup.com matt.keene@chartwellfa.com