pain management in primary care
play

Pain Management in Primary Care Pain was primary reason for 40% of - PDF document

Pain in Primary Care Pain Management in Primary Care Pain was primary reason for 40% of doctor visits in a Finnish study from 2001 Most common reason for visiting doctor Robert M. Taylor, MD Not enough pain specialists to treat all


  1. Pain in Primary Care Pain Management in Primary Care • Pain was primary reason for 40% of doctor visits in a Finnish study from 2001 � Most common reason for visiting doctor Robert M. Taylor, MD • Not enough pain specialists to treat all the patients with chronic pain Associate Professor of Neurology Medical Director • Primary care doctors will end up managing most pain problems Pain and Palliative Medicine Program The Ohio State University • Easier if some basic principles in mind Pain Definition Pain Mechanisms • Traditional pain categories: � Nociceptive • Pain is an unpleasant sensory and • Somatic emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage or • Visceral described in terms of such damage � Neuropathic � Complex Regional Pain Syndrome • Pain is always subjective (CRPS) • Formerly Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD) 1

  2. Chronic Malignant Pain vs. Acute vs. Chronic Pain Chronic Non-malignant Pain • Acute pain • Pathophysiology is similar � Well-defined, temporal pattern of onset • Difference in longevity may be important � Associated with subjective and • Malignant pain associated with diminishing function due to disease progression objective physical signs and with hyperactivity of the autonomic nervous • Risks of long-term opiate therapy may be system more significant in benign pain � Usually self-limited � Emphasize non-pharmacological treatments � Responds to analgesic treatment and/or treatment of underlying disease � Emphasize enhancing function & QOL Chronic Non- Acute vs. Chronic Pain malignant Pain • Chronic pain � Pain that lasts for longer than 3-6 months • Evaluate pain etiology carefully • Or longer than normal healing process • Use non-pharmacolgical modalities � Nervous system dysregulation results in • Assess risk factors for addiction & abuse hypersensitivity to pain � Use non-opioids if possible • Spontaneous generation & perpetuation of pain • Emphasize improved function & QOL as • Adaptation of the autonomic nervous system primary goal of therapy, NOT pain relief • Lack of objective signs and symptoms � Consider using available tools to assess � Pain becomes a problem in itself � Involve family, work, etc. to monitor � Changes in personality, lifestyle, & function 2

  3. Chronic Non- Understanding Addiction malignant Pain • Physical dependence • Use formal pain agreement for informed consent prior to prescribing opioids � Normal and expected phenomenon � Include consent for UDS � Due to decrease in endogenous • Initiate opioids as a therapeutic trial analogues � Discontinue (taper or detox) if ineffective or significant aberrant behaviors noted � Characteristic withdrawal syndrome � Consider referral for addiction evaluation & treatment � Usually not a serious problem • Monitor function & QOL as primary goal • If symptoms improve, drug can be weaned • Monitor UDS & OARRS reports Aberrant Drug-taking Behaviors Understanding Addiction Steven D. Passik, PhD • Probably more predictive • Probably less predictive • Addiction � � Selling prescription drugs Aggressive complaining about need for higher � Prescription forgery doses � Psychological/behavioral phenomenon � Stealing or borrowing � Drug hoarding during another patient’s drugs periods of reduced � Compulsive use causing physical, � Injecting oral formulation symptoms � � psychological, or social harm to the Obtaining prescription Requesting specific drugs drugs from non-medical � patient Acquisition of similar sources drugs from other medical � Concurrent abuse of sources � Continued use despite such harm related illicit drugs � Unsanctioned dose � Multiple unsanctioned escalation 1-2 times � Compulsive actions to acquire the drug dose escalations � Unapproved use of the � Recurrent prescription drug to treat another � Rare in terminally ill patients losses symptom � Reporting psychic effects • Often note increased level of functioning not intended by the clinician 3

  4. Pain Assessment Understanding Addiction Mnemonic • “Pseudo-addiction” • P – provoking, palliating factors � Prevalence uncertain & controversial • Q – quality of pain � Occurs in patients • R – radiation (from where to where) • Whose symptoms are under-treated • Who fear medication will be arbitrarily • S – severity withheld � May exhibit aberrant behaviors • T – temporal course • Hoarding, hostility, manipulation, lying, etc. � Long term, including onset & short term Intensity of Pain • Pain is not measurable, hence we must rely of patients subjective descriptions Pain Assessment • Several rating scales of intensity are available, utilizing numbers, colors, faces � Mild, moderate, severe, excruciating • Can suggest objective standard 4

  5. WHO Pain Ladder Summary 3 Severe • Evaluation of the patient with pain should include: Morphine � Determination of the clinical characteristics of Hydromorphone 2 Moderate the pain by careful history and exam Methadone • Define etiology if possible Fentanyl Acetaminophen + � Determination of the mechanism of the pain Codeine Oxycodone 1 Mild • Nociceptive, neuropathic, or CRPS Acetaminophen + ± Acetaminophen Oxycodone � Classification as either acute or chronic pain ± NSAIDs Acetaminophen ± NSAIDs • Malignant vs. non-malignant chronic pain ± Adjuvants NSAIDs ± Adjuvants ± Adjuvants WHO Ladder Concepts • By the mouth Pharmacologic • By the clock • By the ladder Treatment of Pain • For the individual • Attention to detail Note: Adjuvants may 1) enhance analgesia, 2) treat concurrent symptoms, or 3) provide independent analgesia for specific types of pain 5

  6. Clearance Sensitivity to Opioids Considerations • 90-95% of opioids cleared in urine • Type of Pain Opioid Responsiveness • Dehydration, renal failure, severe hepatic failure may cause decreased clearance Nociceptive • Morphine has an active metabolite (M-6-G) that - Somatic + + + may accumulate in patients with renal - Visceral + + insufficiency Neuropathic + � Consider an alternate opioid in patients with renal failure, (e.g. oxycodone, hydromorphone, fentanyl) Opioid Pharmacology Opioid Adverse Effects • Conjugated in liver Uncommon • Excreted via kidney (90%–95%) Common Bad dreams / hallucinations • First-order kinetics **Constipation** Dysphoria / delirium • Cmax after Dry mouth Myoclonus / seizures � po ≈ 1 h Nausea / vomiting Pruritus / urticaria � SC, IM ≈ 30 min Sedation Respiratory depression � IV ≈ 10-15 min Sweats Urinary retention • Half-life at steady state Opioid-induced neurotoxicity � po / pr / SC / IM / IV ≈ 3-4 h 6

  7. Opioid-Induced Opioid Constipation Neurotoxicity (OIN) • Common to all opioids • Neuropsychiatric syndrome � Effects on CNS, spinal cord, myenteric plexus • Cognitive dysfunction � Easier to prevent than treat • Delirium � Diet usually insufficient • Hallucinations � Bulk forming agents not recommended • Myoclonus/seizures • Hyperalgesia/allodynia - generalized OIN: Treatment Opioid Constipation • Opioid rotation • Stimulant laxative � Senna, bisacodyl, glycerine, casanthranol, etc � Reduce opioid dose (?) • Combine with a stool softener • Hydration � Senna + docusate sodium • Benzodiazepines • Osmotic laxative for refractory cases • Ketamine, psychostimulants � MOM, lactulose, sorbitol, Miralax • Non-opioid therapy 7

  8. Opioid Naïve Patients Equianalgesic Dosing PO/SL Name IV/SQ/IM • Start at a low dose & titrate to pain relief 30 Morphine 10 30 Oxycodone N/A • Opioid doses can be titrated up by 30%- 30 Hydrocodone N/A 100% or more each day for severe pain 7 Hydromorphone 1.5 N/A Fentanyl 0.1 • Until an effective baseline dose can be 300 Meperidine * 100 established, it is best to avoid sustained release or transdermal systems since they cannot be rapidly and accurately titrated. Fentanyl Patch 100 μ g/hr roughly equals Morphine 200 mg po/24hr *DO NOT USE Routine Oral Dosing Routine Oral Dosing Immediate Release Extended Release Formulations Formulations • For adults >60kg, in moderate to severe pain, start with oral morphine 5 mg • Improves compliance, adherence equivalent • May want to start lower for elderly, • Dose q 8, 12, or 24 h (product specific) e. g. 2.5 mg oral equivalent � Don’t crush or chew tablets • Hydrocodone, morphine, hydromorphone, oxycodone oral dosing • May adjust dose every 2–4 days � Dose q 3 to 4 h � Once steady state reached � Adjust dose daily for severe pain 8

  9. Alternate Routes Breakthrough dosing • Use immediate-release opioids • Transmucosal � 5%–15% of 24 hour dose • Feeding tubes � Maximum time interval based on half-life � Minimum time interval based on C max • Rectal ≈ q 1 h • po / pr • Transdermal ≈ q 30 min • SC, IM • Parenteral ≈ q 10–15 min • IV • Intraspinal • Do NOT use extended-release opioids Treating Pain – Ideal Changing Opioids • Use equianalgesic tables, do not guess ! Over Medication � Analogous to changing from IV to oral antibiotics - be precise! Ideal Breakthrough Medication Around- the-Clock • Incomplete cross-tolerance Medication � Start with 50%–75% of published equianalgesic dose • More if uncontrolled pain, less if Persistent Pain adverse effects � Provide adequate breakthrough dosing e m T i 9

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend