OVERVIEW OF SOLAR ENERGY OVERVIEW OF SOLAR ENERGY RENEWABLE ENERGY - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
OVERVIEW OF SOLAR ENERGY OVERVIEW OF SOLAR ENERGY RENEWABLE ENERGY IN THE ILLINOIS PUBLIC SECTOR RENEWABLE ENERGY IN THE ILLINOIS PUBLIC SECTOR MARCH 2, 2010 MARCH 2, 2010 Jason Westrope , Development Manager Development Management Associates,
RENEWABLE ENERGY IN THE ILLINOIS PUBLIC SECTOR RENEWABLE ENERGY IN THE ILLINOIS PUBLIC SECTOR
MARCH 2, 2010 MARCH 2, 2010
Jason Westrope, Development Manager Development Management Associates, LLC Development Management Associates, LLC Pete Kadens, President SoCore Energy Jeremy Jones, Chief T echnology Officer SoCore Energy
Bachelor of Science Mechanical Engineering Virginia Tech 1991 Master of Architecture University of South Florida 1997 Current co-chair of the USGBC Chicago Chapter Research and Education Committee LEED Accredited Professional USGBC 2003 Certified Development Professional ICSC 2008 Member of the HACIA Sustainability Committee Past lectures in Design and Jason has worked directly in the design and implementation of over 6,000,000 square feet of retail and mixed- use development nationwide and numerous acres of planning and urban design projects
Past lectures in Design and Sustainability:
Development Manager | Development Management Associates
Centers
C il
id C t f C it D i + R h Council
Conference
Commissioners Cl B h Ch b f
jason@dmassociates.com
Commerce
Development Management Associates, LLC (DMA) works on behalf of real estate owners to develop and improve high-profile properties, achieving the highest levels of quality and financial performance. We provide development, project management, tenant coordination, and project accounting services for a variety of significant development and redevelopment projects, including:
development consulting project accounting
project management energy projects
Our clients are real estate investors, entrepreneurs, corporations, and investment trusts. They choose DMA for a unique set of strengths that enhance the visibility, credibility, and profitability of every project:
green buildings
Our advanced technology and reporting capabilities support project success and client satisfaction.
www.dmassociates.com
DMA is a national member of USGBC
TO OPTIMIZE THE PERFORMANCE OF REAL ESTATE ASSETS BY PROVIDING TO OPTIMIZE THE PERFORMANCE OF REAL ESTATE ASSETS BY PROVIDING PERSONALIZED INNOVATIVE AND COMPREHENSIVE LEADERSHIP IN DEVELOPMENT AND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
www.dmassociates.com
Green Roofs Energy Efficiency Green Buildings Solar Projects www.dmassociates.com
CLIENT: JMB Realty SOLAR INTEGRATOR: SPG Solar, Inc. 431 3 kW rated photovoltaic 431.3 kW rated photovoltaic (PV) installation Over 1,400 Schott panels
48,500 sf of upper levels of the Constellation Place parking deck Los Angeles, California W ll h Will generate enough energy to offset over 12% of annual energy use and reduce daytime demand by up to 30% through the connected meter Over 10 million pounds of carbon dioxide emissions will be avoided through the Generation
renewable energy gy
CLIENT: JMB Realty SOLAR INTEGRATOR: SPG Solar, Inc. 495 16 kW rated photovoltaic 495.16 kW rated photovoltaic (PV) installation Over 2,180 Sharp 216 Watt high-efficiency modules at 5 and 10 degree tilt g Recent lighting improvements at the Century Park West structure had reduced the facility’s energy consumption b 22% by 22%. Each year, the new PV system will produce up to 642,741 kWh
savings for the property and offset 315 tons property and offset 315 tons
At peak periods the new PV system will offset up to 80%
demand.
buildings and other structures bu gs a
b i d th di t ib t d li ti businesses and other distributed applications
megawatts (MW)
scale power stations of 50+ MW
world (354 MW)
8
layer of phosphorus-doped (N-type) silicon on top of a thicker layer of boron- doped (P-type) silicon
materials are in contact, called the P-N junction
momentum and direction to light-stimulated electrons, resulting in a flow of current when the solar cell is connected to an electrical load
9
distribute, and store the energy produced by the array
the specific components required may include major components such as a DC-AC power inverter, battery bank, system and battery controller, auxiliary energy sources and sometimes the specified electrical load (appliances) (appliances)
10
radiation varies continuously from sunup to sundown and depends
cloud cover, sun position, etc.
maximum “irradiance”
h id i i i as the midpoint in time between sunrise and sunset
solar power striking a given area and is a measure of the intensity of the sunshine intensity of the sunshine
11
Myth #1: Solar (PV) can power my entire facility. Unfortunately, this is rarely the case. Most of the time, roof space doesn't allow for enough power density as it relates to the conversion efficiency
nighttime use than their daytime use and since the sun only shines during the day it makes more sense to buy from your utility at night the day, it makes more sense to buy from your utility at night. A typical solar installation can displace 10-40% of a facility's reliance on the grid.
12
Myth #2: Solar doesn’t work in Illinois because of the terrible weather Myth #2: Solar doesn t work in Illinois because of the terrible weather here.
produced in Germany than anywhere else in the world. Did you know that we have almost as much sun in Chicago as they have in Miami, Florida? Solar can succeed anywhere with the right cost structure and the appropriate incentives.
13
Myth #3:The Obama administration will pay for my entire solar array.
the form of a cash grant. States vary in how much they will pay. In Indiana you get GOOSE EGG. In Massachusetts, depending on the size of the system, you could have 40% of the system paid for. If you want to know about solar incentives in any state the best resource is the DSIRE site: www.dsireusa.org/solar
14
15
S l T ki Si l M lti l A i
16
At d f 2008 U S h d 8 800 MW f i t ll d l
and Japan is third
17
Less Air Pollution no on site air pollution associated with fossil fuel energy generation, which increases health care costs and harms the environment
reduces greenhouse gas emissions as much as removing one car from the road
hour generated than even the most efficient natural gas generation
18
User Value User Benefits Notes
Timely Financial Incentives
ICECF/DCEO
Educational/
CleanTech
Instructional Value
Curriculum
Stabilized Energy Costs for a portion of your bill
10-40% of building’s load
y Help State Meet Solar Mandates
6% solar carve out in Illinois
Monitoring Portal Monitoring Portal and High Visibility
Lobby Kiosk
Attract More Constituents and Donors
19
Donors
Facility Attributes Details Roof Footprint 25 000 Sq Ft + Roof Footprint 25,000 Sq Ft + Remaining Roof Life 15+Years Facility Structure Structure should have at least Facility Structure 8-10 PSF excess capacity Facility Load Profile Facility should have relatively high peak use LEED Facilities with LEED certification more likely to receive incentives Budget Budget dollars should be allocated for building upgrades
20
in Illinois to obtain at least 10% of power from renewable energy sources by 2015 2015
by 2015
Illinois Power Agency (IPA) Illinois Power Agency (IPA)
21
RPS (30+ States & District of Columbia)
22
20+ industrialized countries use “feed in tariffs” California Solar Initiative – 5 year production incentive Gainesville Vermont Sacramento Ontario Gainesville, Vermont, Sacramento, Ontario
Illinois Clean Energy Community Foundation (ICECF) Illinois Clean Energy Community Foundation (ICECF)
23
City of Naperville
Chicago
Museum
Installation Location: University of Illinois-Chicago, Lincoln Hall Production: 57,500 kilowatt hours per year Production: 57,500 kilowatt hours per year Percentage Of Building’s Power Provided By Solar: Approximately 14% Number of Solar Panels: 224 Solar Panels Used: SolarWorld 230W at a 10 degree tilt Proprietary T echnology Used: SoCore’s modular SunLockTM mounting
24
Proprietary and Confidential Proprietary T echnology Used: SoCores modular SunLockTM mounting solution Interesting Facts: One of the largest higher education solar installations in the Midwest
A Chicago solar PV installation with 25 year A Chicago solar PV installation with 25-year manufacturer’s warranty and the first ever truly portable rooftop installation Enphase micro-inverter attached to each solar panel allows for system portability, modularity, panel allows for system portability, modularity, and panel level monitoring SunLockTM portable aluminum mounting solution comes fully assembled to the roof
15
g q
M h i l i t l k li it ft ti & b ll t
26
27
Local Chicago PV Installation Project Budget i l
Type Line Item Total Costs h f System Design and Warranty $10,395 Structural Engineering $3,915 Purchase of Services g g $ , Installation and Delivery $57,372 System Monitoring and Maintenance $6,906 d l $ Equipment & Materials PV modules $66,972 Inverters $22,904 Mounting Equipment $19,104 Balance of System alance of System Equipment $7,404 TOTAL $194,972
28
C h/S i A l M t i C System Size Upfront Cost Cost After Rebates Simple Payback Annual Energy Generated Cash/Savings Generated Over Warranted Lifetime Annual SREC Generat- ion Metric Tons of CO2 Offset Acres of Forest Replenished Cars removed from road 25 kW $162,602 $162,602 Year 33 30,084 $93,354 30 23 0.8 4 25 kW $162,602 $162,602 Year 33 30,084 $93,354 30 23 0.8 4 50 kW $292,963 $292,963 Year 31 60,168 $186,708 60 46 1.5 8 75 kW $422,360 $422,360 Year 31 89,976 $279,205 90 69 2.3 11 100 kW $538 725 $538 725 Year 30 120 060 $372 559 120 92 3 1 15 100 kW $538,725 $538,725 Year 30 120,060 $372,559 120 92 3.1 15 200 kW $1,048,504 $1,048,504 Year 29 240,120 $745,119 240 184 6.1 31 300 kW $1,559,676 $1,559,676 Year 29 359,904 $1,116,822 360 275 9.2 46 400 kW $2,065,169 $2,065,169 Year 29 479,964 $1,489,381 480 367 12.2 61 29 500 kW $2,578,697 $2,578,697 Year 29 600,024 $1,861,941 600 459 15.3 77
Cash/Savings System Size Upfront Cost Cost After Rebates Simple Payback Annual Energy Generated g Generated Over Warranted Lifetime Annual SREC Generation Metric Tons of CO2 Offset Acres of Forest Replenished Cars removed from road 25 kW $162,602 $65,041 Year 18 30,084 $93,354 30 23 0.8 4 50 kW $292,963 $117,185 Year 16 60,168 $186,708 60 46 1.5 8 75 kW $422 360 $168 944 Y 16 89 976 $279 205 90 69 2 3 11 75 kW $422,360 $168,944 Year 16 89,976 $279,205 90 69 2.3 11 100 kW $538,725 $215,490 Year 15 120,060 $372,559 120 92 3.1 15 200 kW $1,048,504 $419,402 Year 15 240,120 $745,119 240 184 6.1 31 , , , , , 300 kW $1,559,676 $623,870 Year 15 359,904 $1,116,822 360 275 9.2 46 400 kW $2,065,169 $1,065,169 Year 18 479,964 $1,489,381 480 367 12.2 61
30
500 kW $2,578,697 $1,578,697 Year 21 600,024 $1,861,941 600 459 15.3 77
1. Decide if the numbers are within criteria for consideration by your non-profit 2. Identify ideal facilities for rooftop solutions 2. Identify ideal facilities for rooftop solutions 3. Forward on information relative to those buildings to a solar provider (address, last two utility bills, 15 minute interval data) 4. Solar provider to prepare specific proposal for project p p p p p p p j 5. Finalize ICECF/DECO grant paperwork, with solar provider’s help, and submit by deadlines 6. Installation 3-5 months after receipt of funds
31
32
MCCORMICK PLACE EAST 3,650 kW installation 15,876 solar panels 3,900,000 kWh produced annually 120 Temporary Green jobs created 120 Temporary Green jobs created 15 Permanent Green jobs created
THE LARGEST ROOFTOP PV INSTALLATION IN THE US
33