Overview of IMRT in head and neck cancer
Jean Bourhis, MD PhD
- IGR, Villejuif & ESTRO -
Overview of IMRT in head and neck cancer Jean Bourhis, MD PhD - - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Overview of IMRT in head and neck cancer Jean Bourhis, MD PhD - IGR, Villejuif & ESTRO - How to improve the therapeutic index of radiotherapy ? Balsitics (PTV, GTV) Biomodulation (CTV/ GTV) Imaging Multimodal / Motion Functional Very
Multimodal / Motion Functional
Cost / sophistication Very high precision RT 2D IMRT IGRT RT 3D,
conformational
Stereo radiotherapy Cyberknife Tomotherapy Carbon 12 Protons
Vero
(EBM Level 1)
Mell LK, Cancer 2005;104:1296-303
Interesting since :
Mendenhall W. JCO 2006
(ex : Lee et al 2002)
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 N= 87 Median FU=30 months
Length of Follow Up
Percent
Lee et al (UCSF), IJROBP, 53:1:12-21
5-Y nodal control: 97% 5-Y primary tumor control: 94%
Mendenhall W. JCO 2006
Lee N. IJROBP 2006
0,25 0,5 0,75 1 6 12 18 24 30 36 42
Contrôle loco-régional Survie globale
(RTOG-EORTC)
0,00 0,20 0,40 0,60 0,80 1,00 3 mois 6 mois 12 mois 18 mois grade 0-1 grade 2-3
(Pow et al, IJROBP 2006, Hong Kong)
RTE conv IMRT p Symptoms Score pain Score deglutition Score eating in public Score teeths Score mouth opening Score dry mouth Score sticky saliva 33,5 [28,5] 35,1 [26,2] 38,2 [31,8] 34,9 [40,0] 48,3 [37,7] 83,1 [25,5] 76,6 [30,1] 21,5 [25,0] 23,0 [25,6] 26,9 [30,3] 19,5 [30,6] 28,8 [31,9] 57,2 [33,2] 47,1 [34,7] 0,01 0,01 0,03 0,02 0,001 <0,0001 <0,0001
RTE conv IMRT Odds ratio adjusted p Q31: mouth pain Q32: pain other Q37: deglutition Q40: mouth aperture Q41: dry mouth Q42: sticky saliva Q49: difficulties to eat 35,8 36,4 56,1 45,5 83,6 80,3 43,3 19,4 16,7 34,8 21,2 56,7 47,5 23,9 3,58 3,35 2,76 2,60 3,17 3,16 2,68 0,02 0,04 0,02 0,02 0,04 0,02 0,03
(GORTEC 2004-01)
Hypothesis = IMRT 75 Gy more efficient & less toxic ? N = 67 pts
Primary Tumor Neck Node Harari 2004
Harari 2004
(Dany Rishin, Lester Peters et al ASCO 2008)
20 40 60 80 100 Estimated percentage locoregional failure-free 1 2 3 4 Years following end of radiotherapy compliant plan by TMC no adv impact adv impact 2P < 0.0001
QA
de chacun des faisceaux d’intensité modulée du patient sur fantôme parallélépipède au Clinac et exploitation des résultats (mesure de la dose absolue par chambre d ’ionisation et de la dose relative par film).
QA
de la distribution de dose cumulée pour l’ensemble des faisceaux d’intensité modulée du patient sur fantôme cylindrique et/ou anthropomorphe au Clinac et exploitation des résultats
Calculation on TPS Measure on film
Portal verifications at each session : isocentre and comparison to DRR Ant- post ; right / left ; head / foot directions
Significant Deviation > 5-6 mm needing correction = 20% of cases if portal every day with correction : Margin CTV to PTV = 3 mm If portal less frequent (any) : Margin CTV to PTV = 6 mm
Elapsed Days
Barker et al. IJROBP 59:960-970, 2004 (MDACC); Lei Dong et al. (MDACC)
Patient I mmobilized with Acquaplast Mask
IGRT DGRT CT (or Multimodality) MVCB, kVCB,or CT
Avantages Source in rotation – no jonction IMRT highly conformal Controle of postionin of soft tissues Simplicity Inconvenients : Duration (>=30 mn) preparation/optimisation Diffuse low dose irradiation
Lee, Schoder, Nehmeh, Humm et al. MSKCC