OUTCOME-BASED EDUCATION
- Assoc. Prof. Ir. Dr. Hayati Abdullah
PEng CEng CMarEng ASEAN Eng REEM M. AFEO FIMarEST FIEM MIEEE
UTMLead
OUTCOME-BASED EDUCATION Assoc. Prof. Ir. Dr. Hayati Abdullah PEng - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
OUTCOME-BASED EDUCATION Assoc. Prof. Ir. Dr. Hayati Abdullah PEng CEng CMarEng ASEAN Eng REEM M. AFEO FIMarEST FIEM MIEEE UTMLead The Outcome At the end of this module, participants are expected to be able to: Explain correctly the concept
PEng CEng CMarEng ASEAN Eng REEM M. AFEO FIMarEST FIEM MIEEE
UTMLead
a holistic and balanced human being. The main purpose
education is to develop the potential of intellectual, physical, emotional and spiritual level of mankind towards perfectionist [Insan Kamil)
Ghazali: Include aspects
physical training and intellectual development of a noble character, brave and respect.
COGNITIVE PSYCHOMOTO R AFFECTIVE
Rounded, holistic and balanced human being
GENERIC / SOFT SKILSS
EXPLICIT TANGIBLE OBSERVABLE COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE PSYCHOMOTOR
WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING IS AN OUTC OUTCOME OME ?
attitudes
➢ Clarity of Focus
➢ Designing Back
➢ High Expectation
➢ Expanded Opportunity
3 S 3 Sta tages of ges of B Bac ackw kwar ard Desi d Design gn Are the desired results, assessments, and learning activities ALIGNED?
WHA WHAT ARE L T ARE LEAR EARNING NING OUT OUTCOMES COMES?
a learning activity
attitudes
Vision & Mission of Faculty Vision & Mission of Department Programme Educational Objectives Programme Learning Outcomes Course Learning Outcomes
DIFFERE DIFFERENT LEV NT LEVELS O ELS OF F LEARNING LEARNING OUT OUTCOMES COMES
Programme Educational Objectives (PEO) Few years after Graduation – 3 to 5 years WHA WHAT S T STUDENT TUDENTS S AR ARE E AB ABLE T LE TO DO O DO LEVELS LEVELS OF OUT OF OUTCOM COMES ES Programme Learning Outcomes (PLOs) Upon graduation Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs) Upon course completion
STAKEHOLDERS PRORGRAME EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES
Management support and commitment
PEO- 1 Regulatory /Professional Bodies
RELA RELATI TIONSHI ONSHIPS PS BETWE BETWEEN EN PE PEOs Os CL CLOs Os PLOs Os AND AND COM COMPLI PLIANC ANCE T E TO THE O THE ST STAKEHOLDERS AKEHOLDERS
Quality Assurance JPT IHL requirements Industrires Parents ….. etc PEO- 2 PEO- 3 PEO- 4 PEO- 5 ….. etc PLO- 1 PLO- 2 PLO- 3 PLO- 4 PLO- 5 ….. etc
PROGRAMME LEARNING OUTCOMES CLO-1
….. etc
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES CLO-3 CLO-4 CLO-5 CLO-2
TDA’s, KJ’s, KP’s, KK’s, JKA and JKKS TDA’s, KJ’s, KP’s, KK’s, JKA and JKKS Course coordinator, Academic Staff Programme Specs Programme Specs Course Outlines
Have programme objectives, programme outcomes, course
Programme outcomes address Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes to be attained by students. Centered around the needs of the students. Stated outcomes can be assessed and evaluated. Aligned delivery of teaching and learning and assessment with the intended learning outcomes (Constructive Alignment)
EAC MQF Quality Assurance of Higher Education
Code of Practice for Programme Accreditation (COPPA) Code of Practice for Programme Institutional Audit (COPIA) Washington Accord EAC Manual
The Washington Accord, signed in 1989, is an international agreement among bodies responsible for accrediting engineering degree programs. It recognizes the substantial equivalency of programs accredited by those bodies and recommends that graduates of programs accredited by any of the signatory bodies be recognized by the other bodies as having met the academic requirements for entry to the practice of engineering.
18th June 2009 The Board of Engineers Malaysia (BEM) was accepted as the 13th signatory of the Washington Accord
REGISTRATION OF ENGINEERS ACT 1967 (Revised 2015)
before taking up employment as an engineer
projects, analyze case studies, give case presentations, show their abilities to think, question, research, and make decisions based on the findings.
community or in entrepreneurial service teams to propose solutions to problems and market their solutions
⚫ From Grade-Oriented to Outcome-Oriented ⚫ From Content-Based to Ability-Based ⚫ From Lecturer-Centred to Student-Centred
OBE OBE RE REQUIRE QUIRES S THE THE FOLL FOLLOWING WING PAR ARAD ADIGM IGM SHI SHIFT FT
Content Based Learning Outcomes Based Approach Passive students Active learners Assessment process – exam & grade driven Continuous assessment Rote learning Critical thinking, reasoning, reflection & action Content based/broken into subjects Integration knowledge, learning relevant/ connected real life situations Textbook/worksheet focused & teacher centred Learner centred & educator/ facilitator use group/ teamwork See syllabus as rigid & non negotiable Learning programmes seen as guides that allow educators to be innovative & creative in designing programmes/ activities Teachers/trainers responsible for learning - motivated by personality of teacher Learners take responsibility for their learning, learners motivated by constant feedback/ affirmation of worth Emphasis what teacher hopes to achieve Emphasis outcomes – what learner becomes & understands Content placed in rigid time frames Flexible time frames - learners work at own pace Stay in single learning institution until complete Learners can gather credits different institutions until achieve Qualification Previous knowledge & experience in learning field ignored – Each time attends whole course Recognition of prior learning: after pre-assessment, learners credited outcomes demonstrated or transfer credits elsewhere
◼
What do you want the students to have or able to do?
◼
How can you best help students achieve it?
◼
How will you know what they have achieved it?
◼
How do you close the loop ?
◼
Knowledge, Skill, Attitude
◼
Continuous Quality Improvements
◼
Student Centred Delivery
◼
Assessment
Program Outcomes (PLO) Program Objectives (PEO)
Missions Visions Stakeholders
Course Outcomes (CLO)
Advisory committee
Alumni Assessment Assessment Assessment CQI CQI CQI
Analysis Analysis Analysis
https://goo.gl/images/Re7kuY
Special thank you to Prof. Dr. Zaki Bin Kamsah, Dr. Adibah Binti Abdul Latif and Dr. Rohaya Binti Talib for providing the slides and for sharing their wisdom.