Our Goals Our Goals Further Expand our Role in Improve our Product - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

our goals our goals
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Our Goals Our Goals Further Expand our Role in Improve our Product - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Our Goals Our Goals Further Expand our Role in Improve our Product by the Community Collective Design Design a Structure to Fit 21st Build on our Commitment to Model of Education that Adapts Project-Based Learning, to the Needs


slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Our Goals

slide-3
SLIDE 3

▸ Further Expand our Role in

the Community

▸ Build on our Commitment to

Project-Based Learning, Differentiation and Collaboration

▸ Invest in the Future with

Public-Private Partnerships

▸ Reduce Overall Footprint of

District

▸ Improve our Product by

Collective Design

▸ Design a Structure to Fit 21st

Model of Education that Adapts to the Needs of our Families

▸ Further Expand Academic

Opportunities

▸ Continue Improvements to

Safety & Security Across District

▸ Maintenance of Year-Round

Option in K-8

Our Goals

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Our Process

slide-5
SLIDE 5

▸Revisited 5-Year Strategic Plan from 2012 ▸Year-Long Internal Deliberation and Board-

Level Discussions Regarding Potential Strategic Planning Initiatives for the Future

▸ Focus Panels (Seven Meetings - 15-20 people each) ▸ Focus Groups (Two Meetings - 50 people each) ▸ Video Presentations to Focus Group Members ▸ Request for and Assessment of Feedback

▸Community Engagements

▸ Numerous Meetings with civic organizations, parent/

student/staff groups, individual community members, etc.

▸Consultation with Banach & Banach

▸ Community Survey re: District Performance ▸ Meetings with District Officials ▸ Board Presentation

Engaged 600+ Stakeholders During Strategic Planning Process

Strategic Planning Since 2017

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Initial

Grades E5-K - 2 and Kids & Company @ Rolland- Warner Campus Grades 3-5 @ Zemmer Campus Year-Round Elementary@ Turrill Middle School Campus (6-8) @ East Site High School Campus (9-12) @ West Site + Community Center

Option #1 Option #2 Option #3

Early Childhood Center @ Schickler (E-5, K, ECSE) Early Childhood Center @ Schickler (E-5, K, ECSE) Early Childhood Center @ Schickler (E-5, K, ECSE) Lower Elementary Campus (Grades 1-2) @ Zemmer Lower Elementary Campus (Grades 1-2-3 split) @ Zemmer Lower Elementary Campus (Grades 1-2) @ RW Upper Elementary Campus (Grades 3-4-5) @ R-W Upper Elementary Campus (Grades 3 split-4-5) @ R-W Upper Elementary Campus (Grades 3–4) @ Zemmer Middle School Campus (6-8) @ East Site Middle School Campus (6-8) @ East Site Middle School Campus (5-8) @ East Site High School Campus (9-12) @ West Site High School Campus (9-12) @ West Site High School Campus (9-12) @ West Site

Post

E5-K @ Turrill Elementary Grades 1-4 @ East Campus Grades 5-6 Intermediate School @ Rolland-Warner Grades 7-8 Middle School @ Zemmer High School Campus (9-12) @ West Campus

Prior to Community Engagements Options Vetted by Focus Groups* Concept from Final Focus Group**

**Solicited feedback from parent/student/staff groups as well as Focus Group members

Proposal Evolution

*The site location of Central Office, Alternative Education and Virtual Learning varied throughout the process

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Our Plan

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Site Turrill East Campus R-w Zemmer West Campus Schickler Grades E5-K 1-4 5-6 7-8 9-12 9-12 + Virtual School Early Childhood Center Lapeer Elementary Intermediate School Middle School Lapeer High School Community HS/Virtual Student population 400-500 1200-1400 600-800 600-800 1300-1500 100-200 Renovation requirements Minor Moderate Minor Minor Substantial Minor

PROPOSED DISTRICT STRUCTURE

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Bond Proposal and Project Costs

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Priority Change Cost 1 NA $97.7 Million 1A

  • $7.9

Million $89.8 Million 2 + $2.3 Million $100.0 Million 3 +$2.5 Million $102.5 Million

Bond Proposal Cost Options

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Bond Proposal Ranges

$89 Million $103 Million

Original Barton Malow Estimate: $126 million

$75 Million $125 Million

Original Range Estimate Current Proposal Range

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Building Total Project Costs Major Items

Turrill $866,405 Technology, Paving, roof repair East CAmpus $8,162,440 Major Renovation RW Campus $765,097 Geothermal Repair, technology Zemmer Campus $827,451 Geothermal Repair, technology West Campus $77,231,170 Full-scale renovation Schickler $561,030 Technology, minor renovation Central Office $753,295 Technology Bus Garage $6,834,137 Parking Lot , new buses, facility Upgrades Maple Grove $335,242 New Roof Lynch $447,856 Security, Structural Viability Costs Mayfield $480,788 Security, Structural Viability Costs Murphy $387,595 Security, Structural Viability Costs

Priority 1 Cost by Building

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Potential Priority 1 Cost Deductions

▸ Roof at East Campus - $2.7 Million ▸ Reduction of 20 New Bus Purchases - $2.0 Million ▸ 50% Reduction of Elementary Viability Costs

(Mayfield, Murphy and Lynch) - $700,000

▸ Reduction of District Technology Purchases -

$500,000

▸ Schickler Complete Restroom Renovations -

$270,000

▸ New Roof at Maple Grove - $335,000

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Potential Priority 1 Reduction Savings Board/Admin Input

Roof at East Campus $2.7 Million Universal support to maintain as priority 1 20 new bus purchases $2.0 Million No support for decrease more than 10 buses 50% Reduction of elementary viability costs $500,000 Maintain 100 % of priority 1 recommendation Schickler Restroom renovation $270,000 Universal support to deduct from Priority 1 New roof at maple grove $335,000 Universal support to deduct from Priority 1 Reduction of district technology $500,000 Support to maintain as priority 1

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Proposed Project Additions

▸ Furniture and Furnishings (District-Wide) ▸ District Technology Improvements ▸ Bleachers and Restrooms at Athletic Complex

Priority 3

▸ HVAC Control Panel Upgrade ▸ Auditorium/Theater Lighting Upgrades at East Campus

Priority 2

▸ Improvements to Facilities/Infrastructure at Skinner Lake

Priority 1

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Priority List for Re-Insertion of Bond Projects

Rank Item Cost

1 Roof @ East Site $2.7 Million 2 Busses $2.0 Million 3A Elementary structural viability costs $700,000 3B Technology $500,000

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Amount bond term Increase in Debt Levy Overall Levy Increase for average homeowner $89 Million 24 years, 3.5 months 1.85 4.60 $11.44 $95 millon 24 years, 3.5 months 1.96 4.71 $12.11 $100 million 24 years, 3.5 months 2.14 4.89 $13.21 $103 million 24 years, 3.5 months 2.22 4.97 $13.71

Figures are based on most recent taxable value data and are subject to change

Example Bond Costs

slide-18
SLIDE 18

District Bond Year(s) Total Amount Raised Total Levy in mills

Brandon 1996, 2006 $114.2 Million 12.2 Clarkston 1997, 2003, 2016 $217.3 million 7.0 Davison 1996, 2013 $25.8 million 2.3 Fenton 1998, 2006, 2014 $77.1 million 6.5 Grand Blanc 2004, 2015 $126.6 million 6.3 Lake Orion 1996, 1998, 2000, 2002, 2018 $292.1 million 7.5 Lapeer 2007 $56.8 Million 2.8 Oxford 2001, 2009, 2017 $122.7 million 7.9 Rochester 1997, 2000, 2004, 2015 $457.3 Million 7.5

Financial Investments in Peer Districts

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Date(s) February 20 Presentation of Recommendation to Board of Education March 6 Board vote on Strategic Plan/call for Bond Election March 7 Bond Campaign Begins November 5 Election Day* November 6 Transition planning for 2022-23 school year begins* August 2022 Transition complete - New Configuration in Place *

Timeline

* Contingent on Bond Passage