or Crazy? ... or just gluttons for punishment? David St. John - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

or
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

or Crazy? ... or just gluttons for punishment? David St. John - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Normative Flow Analysis: An Ecosystem-Based Approach in a Local Government Setting or Crazy? ... or just gluttons for punishment? David St. John Project Manager King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks Presented to AWRA Fall


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Normative Flow Analysis: An Ecosystem-Based Approach in a Local Government Setting

  • r

Crazy? ... or just gluttons for punishment?

David St. John Project Manager King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks Presented to AWRA Fall Conference November 14, 2002

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Applying Normative Approach - AWRA Fall Conference - 11/14/02 2

We Aren’t That Crazy … “…whenever possible, the natural river system should be allowed to repair itself. This approach is likely to be the most successful and least expensive way to restore and maintain the ecological integrity

  • f flow-altered rivers.

Although the most effective mix of human-aided and natural recovery methods will vary with the river… existing knowledge makes a strong case that restoring natural flows should be a cornerstone of our management approach to river ecosystems.”

LeRoy Poff et al., 1997, from Bioscience article The Natural Flow Regime

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Applying Normative Approach - AWRA Fall Conference - 11/14/02 3

What are We Trying to Accomplish?

  • Increase the effectiveness of King County’s flow-related authorities

and responsibilities for protecting or restoring habitat conditions for native species - including salmon

  • Support a scientific and policy dialogue with interested parties that

improves our understanding of our management opportunities related to flow

  • Develop analytical and decision-making tools that better connect
  • ur knowledge of hydrology and ecology to our decisions

See “Return of the Kings” at www.metrokc.gov/exec/esa/king_county.htm

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Applying Normative Approach - AWRA Fall Conference - 11/14/02 4

What are Our Drivers?

  • Regulations: ESA, GMA and CWA, e.g. stormwater, land use

decisions

  • Regulators: NMFS, USFWS, etc.
  • Science: The Independent Science Panel, the Instream Flow

Council

  • Processes: DOE flow setting in critical basins, WRIA planning
  • Tribal Interests: Treaty Rights
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Applying Normative Approach - AWRA Fall Conference - 11/14/02 5

How Did We Get Here?

  • 1999 - Return of the Kings published
  • 2000 - WRIA 9 Limiting Factors report: Index of Hydrologic

Alteration (IHA) analysis complete

  • 2000 - 2001 - WRIA 8 Managed Water analysis
  • Fall 2001 - we conclude that our goals, the regulatory and

conservation context, and the experience of others make a Normative Flow Analysis approach a logical, but not risk- free, choice

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Applying Normative Approach - AWRA Fall Conference - 11/14/02 6

What Does “Normative” Flow Mean to Us?

  • A flow regime that resembles the natural flow regime sufficiently

to sustain all life stages of a diverse suite of native species, including salmonid populations

  • Timing, duration, magnitude, frequency and rate of change are all

important and should be reflected in flow management programs - setting minimums isn’t enough

  • It does not dictate that the ultimate outcome of the project must be

recreating pre-settlement conditions

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Applying Normative Approach - AWRA Fall Conference - 11/14/02 7

What Relevant Analysis Examples Can We Find?

  • Roanoke (VA),

Apalachicola (FL), San Pedro (AZ)

  • IHA / RVA Approach

“…bridge a chasm between applied river management and current theories of aquatic ecology…"

  • Colorado - Glen

Canyon Dam (AZ), Kissimmee (FL)

  • Provide flood flows to

rejuvenate downstream habitat

  • Pecos (NM)
  • Provide spring freshets

as spawning cue

  • Trinity (CA)
  • Provide flows for
  • utmigration and to

rejuvenate gravel habitat

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Applying Normative Approach - AWRA Fall Conference - 11/14/02 8

Project Assumptions

  • We can’t recreate pre-settlement hydrology.
  • History gives us clues. The better the future flow regime mimics

key parameters of the less altered flow regime the better off listed salmon and other native species will be because they evolved successfully within that flow regime

  • King County can contribute to solutions. King County can

implement/adapt our programs and policies at meaningful time and space scales in response to the ecosystem effects of our management actions

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Applying Normative Approach - AWRA Fall Conference - 11/14/02 9

HYPOTHETICAL

Time Discharge

Current Flow Regime Pre-settlement Flow Regime

Hydrographically Speaking

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Applying Normative Approach - AWRA Fall Conference - 11/14/02 10

HYPOTHETICAL

Time Discharge

Current Flow Regime Pre-settlement Flow Regime

Dislocation in timing could mean delayed arrival at spawning grounds… or emergence

  • f macroinvertebrates

Hydrographically Speaking

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Applying Normative Approach - AWRA Fall Conference - 11/14/02 11

HYPOTHETICAL

Time Discharge

Current Flow Regime Pre-settlement Flow Regime

Reduced peaks could mean reduced access to side-channel spawning or rearing areas

Hydrographically Speaking

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Applying Normative Approach - AWRA Fall Conference - 11/14/02 12

HYPOTHETICAL

Time Discharge

Current Flow Regime Pre-settlement Flow Regime

Dramatically reduced peaks mean habitat- forming hydraulic processes are minimized

Hydrographically Speaking

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Applying Normative Approach - AWRA Fall Conference - 11/14/02 13

HYPOTHETICAL

Time Discharge

Normative Flow Regime Current Flow Regime Pre-settlement Flow Regime

Hydrographically Speaking

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Applying Normative Approach - AWRA Fall Conference - 11/14/02 14

Analysis to Action King County has several ways to contribute hydrologically…

  • Development and use of reclaimed water resources
  • Regulation of and planning for land use in floodplains and in upland

areas

  • Implementation of stormwater management requirements
  • Operation and maintenance of a regional wastewater management

system

  • Coordination with others in watershed that have hydrologic effects
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Applying Normative Approach - AWRA Fall Conference - 11/14/02 15

Analysis to Action King County has several ways to contribute hydraulically (tricky in highly altered systems)…

  • Implementation of aquatic/riparian habitat restoration projects
  • Maintenance, restoration and/or removal of flood management

facilities (e.g., setback levees, flood control structures)

  • Acquisition of floodprone properties
  • Regulation of clearing and grading in riparian areas
  • Coordination with others in watershed that have hydrologic effects
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Applying Normative Approach - AWRA Fall Conference - 11/14/02 16

Hydrologic Actions Hydraulic Actions

Analysis to Action: Relationships and Tools

Quantity Habitat Structure & Function Salmon:

  • Productivity
  • Spatial

Structure

  • Abundance
  • Diversity

HSPF [SWAMP] [PRISM] [WQA] Others? IFIM EDT Others? PHABSIM Others?

?

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Applying Normative Approach - AWRA Fall Conference - 11/14/02 17

Normative Flow Parameters of Interest Hydrologic Characterization

  • Magnitude and Frequency - How much water and how often?
  • Duration - How long do flow conditions persist?
  • Timing - When do flow events occur?
  • Rate of Change - Is the flow regime flashy or stable?

That’s only a piece of the puzzle...

Hydrology

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Applying Normative Approach - AWRA Fall Conference - 11/14/02 18

Normative Flow Parameters of Interest Ecological/Biological Response

  • River productivity
  • Substrate size distributions
  • Channel and floodplain morphology and connectivity
  • Benthic macroinvertebrate distribution, diversity, and productivity
  • Floodplain vegetation communities
  • Aquatic species interactions (trophic interactions, competition)
  • Species life history and habitat use
  • Other(s)?

Ecology/ Biology Hydrology

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Applying Normative Approach - AWRA Fall Conference - 11/14/02 19

Examples of Key Study Questions

  • Which flow parameters “matter most” to the conservation and

recovery of current and potential future ESA-listed species?

  • How should stream order affect the application of natural flow

regime analysis and normative flow management?

  • Are there existing ecosystem models that can be used to

incorporate normative flow concepts?

  • What do natural flow analysis and normative concepts offer for

highly modified systems or rivers with highly altered channel and floodplain morphology?

  • Are there flow regime scaling

factors to maintain ecological function in rivers with flood control levees and dams?

Ecology/ Biology Hydrology

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Applying Normative Approach - AWRA Fall Conference - 11/14/02 20 October 2002 January 2003 April 2003 July 2003 Develop Conceptual Framework Build hydrological/biological/ecological analysis framework and tools Choose Method Testing Sites for Narrative Method Run test on Method Testing Sites/ evaluate results Develop hydro/eco indicators and relationships Modify/ augment analysis tools IHA/RVA analyses(?) Apply Narrative Method to Management Application Sites Develop management scenarios Choose preliminary Management Application Sites Identify management questions to address through tool development and application

When?

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Applying Normative Approach - AWRA Fall Conference - 11/14/02 21

What is a “Narrative Method”?

  • A non-mathematical expression of flow-ecology relationships
  • Non-mathematical hypotheses
  • A first step toward developing a mathematical method
  • May take the form of “if-then” statements
  • May be quantitative but use thresholds or categories
  • A prudent response to realities of data, time, and dollar limitations
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Applying Normative Approach - AWRA Fall Conference - 11/14/02 22

Project Organization

Project Management (KC DNRP/KC Exec’s Office) Science Review Team Technical Team Policy Linkages Group for KC Actions WRIAs External Mgmt Advisory Group

  • IFC, TPU, ACOE, ?
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Applying Normative Approach - AWRA Fall Conference - 11/14/02 23

Some Challenges (aka “Punishment”)

  • Ecological info unevenness… or unavailability
  • King County doesn’t control all aspects of flow or actions that affect

flow

  • Timescale of hydrological and ecological response to actions is

variable, and can be l...o….n……...g

  • Pessimism about anyone’s ability to do anything about flow

problems (reversibility?)

  • Inertia around commonly used analytical approaches - reductionism
  • Regulation endpoint still is minimum flow
  • Integration with water quality analysis and actions
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Applying Normative Approach - AWRA Fall Conference - 11/14/02 24

Find project info at this King County web site: www.metrokc.gov/wlr/BASINS/flows/index.htm

  • r send an e-mail to:

david.stjohn@metrokc.gov Thank You!